Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2004 EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT OF IMMATURE STAGES OF ELACHERTUS SCUTELLATUS (HYMENOPTERA: EULOPHIDAE) IN FLORIDA: THE FIRST NORTH AMERICAN RECORD
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The first North American record for Elachertus scutellatus, a parasitoid of Calpodes ethlius Stoll, occurred August 1999, in Florida. A simple rearing protocol was established to allow the morphology and development of this wasp to be examined. The egg and larval morphology and development of E. scutellatus resemble other Elachertus species. The freshly-ecdysed pupa, on the other hand, is rare among parasitoids in that it secretes a fluid from its anus which, when dry, fastens the pupa to its substrate. The death of the colony after eight months has many possible explanations including a laboratory-induced castration, inappropriate food source(s), and pathogenic infection.

The names Elachertus scutellatus and Ardalus scutellatus, were used by Howard (1897) and Ashmead (1900) to describe what is now considered to be a single species of eulophid wasp (Boucek 1988). Elachertus scutellatus Howard, within the tribus Elachertini, is the name now used by convention (Boucek 1988). Boucek (1988) has provided a complete key to the genus Elachertus.

Although the genus Elachertus is cosmopolitan, it is especially well represented and diverse in Central America (Hanson & Gauld 1995). E. scutellatus has been recorded in the Caribbean (Howard 1897; Ashmead 1900). It was collected in southern Florida, the first North American record for this species, by the first author in August 1999 (identification confirmed by Dr. Michael Schauff, USDA, ARS, at the National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C.). With the exception of a few studies on the taxonomy of E. scutellatus and its distribution (Howard 1897; Ashmead 1900; Urlich 1932; Bennett & Hughes 1959; Boucek 1977; Cock 1985; Boucek 1988), very little is known of the biology of this wasp.

Elachertus scutellatus is an ectoparasitoid of the caterpillar of the Brazilian skipper, Calpodes ethlius Stoll (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) (Urlich 1932; Clausen 1978; Boucek 1977; Cock 1985). There are no recorded alternate hosts for Elachertus scutellatus. The Brazilian skipper is a serious pest of Canna species (Cannaceae) (Scudder 1889; Moore 1928; Young 1982; Reinert et al. 1983; Smith et al. 1994) and arrowroot, Maranta arundinacea (Marantaceae) (Cock 1985) in tropical and subtropical regions. Arrowroot is grown for the starch obtained from its rhizomes and is native to northern South America and the Lesser Antilles (Cock 1985). St. Vincent is the principal world producer, although it also has been grown in Barbados, Bermuda, Dominica, Jamaica, and St. Lucia (Cock 1985). The Brazilian skipper has been recorded in Bermuda since 1910 (Bennett & Hughes 1959; Cock 1985). Because of the severe damage caused to Canna by this caterpillar, ornamental Canna species are not planted extensively (Bennett & Hughes 1959; Cock 1985). In Florida, for instance, which is the northern-most permanent range of this skipper, the Miami Parks Authority discontinued the use of ornamental Canna plants because of the voracious feeding of skipper larvae (Smith et al. 1994).

Attempts have been made to introduce E. scutellatus into several Caribbean islands as a biocontrol agent of C. ethlius caterpillars feeding on arrowroot. In 1951, E. scutellatus wasps were introduced from Trinidad to St. Vincent to control C. ethlius on commercial arrowroot crops (in Cock 1985). The Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute (1982) made additional releases of E. scutellatus into St. Vincent and initiated introductions into Barbados. Biocontrol attempts in Bermuda began in 1953, when twenty adult E. scutellatus wasps were imported from Trinidad (Bennett & Hughes 1959). In 1960, more wasps were imported into Bermuda from Jamaica (Cock 1985).

In 1960 and 1962 the United States Department of Agriculture introduced E. scutellatus wasps (under the name E. meridionalis) into Bermuda in an attempt to control C. ethlius feeding on canna (Clausen 1978; Cock 1985). A successful rearing protocol was developed, but not published (F. D. Bennett, pers. comm.). Although an initial establishment of the parasitoid was confirmed, surveys in 1963 indicated that E. scutellatus was not maintained in Bermuda, likely due to the lower winter temperature and seasonal depletion of hosts, conditions not present at the collection sites (F. D. Bennett, pers. comm.). The Brazilian skipper is still a severe pest of canna and arrowroot plants in tropical areas (Cock 1985).

This paper provides a detailed description of the external morphology and development of Elachertus scutellatus with accompanying photographs.

Materials and Methods

A colony of E. scutellatus was established from parasitized C. ethlius caterpillars collected in residential gardens in southern Florida, where Canna is common as a perennial ornamental plant. Three main sites in the Fort Lauderdale and Pompano Beach area with persistent E. scutellatus wasp populations were identified between May 8 and June 30, 2000.

Elachertus scutellatus was reared in an incubator at 25°C (77°F), the average annual temperature for Fort Lauderdale, Florida as recorded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (1998), and high RH under a L:D 14:10 regime.

Host C. ethlius caterpillars were reared in a greenhouse at 22°C, high RH and under long-day conditions. This caterpillar is a near-monophagous leaf-rolling species and was fed ad libitum on leaves of the Canna lily. Caterpillars were exposed to adult wasps early in the third larval stadium (MacDonald & Caveney 2004).

Pre-adult E. scutellatus Rearing

After exposure to wasps, the caterpillars were placed under a dissecting microscope to examine whether eggs had been laid on their integument. Parasitized caterpillars were placed individually in 100-mm diameter Petri dishes together with a damp piece of filter paper and a fresh piece of Canna leaf as food. Fresh leaf material was given daily as long as the hosts continued to feed. As a check for parasitism, apparently non-parasitized caterpillars were placed in 100-mm diameter Petri dishes with a damp filter paper and leaf material. These caterpillars were fed and observed until they completed the molt to the next instar. As molting confirmed the caterpillars were not parasitized, they were discarded.

Each Petri dish was sterilized daily with 70% ethanol, rinsed with distilled water and a new piece of damp filter paper was placed in the bottom. The host leafroll was kept folded to conserve moisture for parasitoid larvae and only opened briefly for observation each day. Upon pupation of the parasitoid, the leafroll was opened and stapled to filter paper to prevent curling of the leaf as it dried, and to allow easy observation. Observations of the immature wasp stages were made each day and the development of the parasitoid on the host was described.

Adult E. scutellatus Rearing

Adult wasp broods were held in Nalgene® transparent styrene-acrylonitrile utility boxes (7 × 6 × 12 cm). The wasps were provided with pure Billybee® clover honey brushed onto small yellow “Post-it”® notes (3.7 × 5 cm) stuck to the inside of the box (Hagley & Barber 1992; Pitcairn & Gutierrez 1992; Zaviezo & Mills 1999). Humidity was kept high in the container by placing moist filter paper in the bottom of the dishes. Moisture was not allowed to collect into droplets on the container walls, as the adults drowned easily within them. The wasps were removed daily with a mouth aspirator and the container was sterilized with 70% ethanol and rinsed with distilled water. The adults were sexed, mortality recorded and the healthy wasps then returned to the container with fresh honey.

One early third instar host caterpillar was provided per one or two adult female wasps. Host caterpillars were removed from the colony and exposed to adult wasps in the breeding population several times a week for an average of 24 h, although oviposition occasionally was completed within a few h.

Results

External Morphology and Development of E. scutellatus

Egg: The egg of E. scutellatus is a large, yolk-rich anhydropic structure with a thick, tough chorion (Fig. 1a). A simple anchor on the egg, possibly an extension of the chorion (Clausen 1940; Kasparyan 1981), penetrates the host cuticle and secures the egg to the host integument. The egg has the shortest developmental duration of the immature stages. Embryogenesis is completed in about two days (2.1 ± 0.2, n = 39).

Larva: E. scutellatus larvae are hymenopteriform, 13-segmented (Gauld & Bolton 1988) and lack any tubercles or spines (Fig. 1b). The number of instars was not determined. Following parasitoid hatching, the host caterpillar ceases to feed but continues to expel fecal pellets. The parasitoid larvae feed externally on the caterpillar for six days (6.0 ± 0.6, n = 13). During this time, the host turns from green to a dull yellow color, presumably due to the absence of gut contents and hemolymph normally visible through its translucent cuticle. Initially, the gut contents of the wasp larvae appear white, but as feeding ensues the gut turns yellow or brown. The host caterpillar dies several days after the parasitoids begin feeding and is often entirely consumed before the wasps pupate. Frequently the hosts died prematurely, usually within two days of wasp feeding, from what appeared to be a pathogenic infection. This caused the death of the associated parasitoid larvae.

Pupa: When feeding is complete, approximately one day prior to pupation, E. scutellatus larvae leave the host carcass but remain within the leafroll (Fig. 1c). They then expel their gut contents and pupate. E. scutellatus does not spin a cocoon for pupation (Fig. 1d) but instead, as seen in most chalcidoid wasps, the pupa is obtect (appendages are held against the body by a secretion produced at the last larval molt and the exposed surfaces of the appendages are heavily cuticularized) (Richards & Davies 1964) and adecticous (has reduced mandibles not used in adult eclosion) (Richards & Davies 1964). The pupae actively pump a clear fluid from their anus (Fig. 2) prior to tanning and hardening of their exterior. When dry, this fluid becomes fibrous and attaches the pupae to the inner surface of their host’s leafroll.

One to two days prior to eclosion in the female wasp, a dark ovipositor becomes visible through the pupal casing as it stands out against her yellow abdomen. Adult wasps emerge within one week of pupal ecdysis (6.5 ± 0.5, n = 10).

Adult: The adult wasp is black, approximately 1.5 mm long, with reddish eyes and ocelli (Howard 1897). The anterior portion of the ventral side of the adult male abdomen is translucent (Fig. 1e). The anterior portion of the ventral side of the female abdomen is honey-yellow (Howard 1897). The clearly visible ovipositor is positioned on the ventral midline of the female abdomen, but does not extend past its tip (Fig. 1f). Females were typically larger than males within a brood, although between broods the size range of the sexes overlaps considerably.

Discussion

As seen in many ectoparasitoids, E. scutellatus wasps lay anhydropic eggs that have a large enough quantity of yolk that the embryo can complete its development to the larval stage without the need to sequester protein and nutrients from the host (Quicke 1997). The yolk of anhydropic eggs is rich in protein, of which vitellin is the major component, and has numerous lipid droplets (Quicke 1997). A large amount of egg protein is associated with the consumption of host fluids by female wasps (Flanders 1950; Le Ralec 1995). The eggs of most parasitoids are roughly oval and many ectoparasitoid eggs have stalks or pedicels to anchor the egg to the host (Quicke 1997). The morphology of E. scutellatus eggs is much like the eggs of the ichneumonid subfamily Tryphoninae, another group of ectoparasitic koinobiont wasps (Mason 1967; Kasparyan 1981).

The egg of E. scutellatus is unusual in that it is very large with a tough chorion. This presumably protects against both desiccation (Mason 1967) and physical damage that may occur when the host is allowed to remain active and mobile after attack by a parasitoid wasp (Mason 1967). To protect against the dehydration of eggs, female wasps often will attack only hosts living in humid or partially concealed situations (Mason 1967). To protect the eggs from the active host, female E. scutellatus wasps most often place the eggs between the host prolegs where they are difficult for the host to detect and destroy. These constraints are claimed to account for the rarity of ectoparasitic koinobionts (Gauld 1988; Godfray 1994; Mayhew & Blackburn 1999).

The larval morphology of E. scutellatus resembles that of other eulophids (Gauld & Bolton 1988). The white appearance of first instars of the wasp probably is due to the prenatal yolk resorbed during embryogenesis (Anderson 1973) and as feeding ensues, the larvae take on the color of the consumed host fluids, which can be seen through the translucent cuticle. Although the number of instars for E. scutellatus was not determined, Hanson & Gauld (1995) determined that in other eulophids there are three to five instars.

Parasitoid larvae are capable of altering the physiology of their active hosts, increasing or arresting developmental rates (Harvey et al. 1998; Doury et al. 1995; Hemerik & Harvey 1999) and changing host feeding habits (Shaw 1981; Powell 1989). Oral secretions from larval E. scutellatus may be the cause of the observed cessation in caterpillar feeding (Godfray 1994; Morales-Ramos et al. 1995; Richards & Edwards 1999) as well as the lack of a host phenoloxidase reaction at larval feeding sites (Richards & Edwards 1999). Interestingly, the larvae of pimpline ichneumonids that parasitize lepidopteran pupae are capable of producing toxic anal secretions from modified Malpighian tubules that inhibit host phenoloxidase activity (Godfray 1994). Although the presence and targets of larval secretions have not been closely studied, it seems parasitoid larvae possess specific adaptations that may alter host physiology and result in an increase in their own chance of survival.

The Eulophidae are exceptional within the Chalcidoidea in that silk cocoon formation is rare (Quicke 1997). Elachertus scutellatus do not produce a cocoon but instead harden and tan their cuticle (Richards & Davies 1964) and fasten the pupa to the substrate with a clear fluid that becomes fibrous when dry. Fidgen and Eveleigh (1998) state that Elachertus cacoeciae pupae attach themselves by their meconium [“waste material excreted by an insect upon eclosion as an adult (a few parasitic wasps) or, in the case of the majority of parasitic wasps, just prior to pupation” (Quicke 1997)]. It seems unlikely that the fluid is simply a waste product in E. scutellatus, as the prepupae expel their gut contents far in advance of the active production of the clear fluid they use for attachment. It has been reported that many chalcidoids produce a cocoon-like structure from a liquid secreted by the anal end (and occasionally also the oral end) of the final instar (Flanders 1938; Quicke 1997). In several endoparasitoids, the fluid flows over the larvae under the pressure of the host hemolymph, then dries and hardens into an amorphous sheath often associated with host tracheae (Flanders 1938; Colazza & Bin 1992; Ceresa-Gastaldo & Chiappini 1994). In the Chalcididae, the origin of the liquid is the iliac glands, structures homologous to the specially modified Malpighian tubules found in many ichneumonoid larvae (Quicke 1997). Freshly-ecdysed E. scutellatus pupae may not need to produce a protective cocoon with this liquid (as they are ectoparasitic) and instead make use of the host shelter. In E. scutellatus the excreted fluid is restricted to the anal area and is used to fasten the pupa to its substrate. This behavior seems to be intermediate between the formation of endoparasitic or silk cocoon produced anally and a lack of anal silk excretion in most parasitoids. The hindgut of chalcid larvae is very muscular and adapted to active expulsion of cocoon-forming secretions (Flanders 1938).

Generally, adult male wasps emerge before females (Harvey et al. 1998; Hanson & Gauld 1995; Jyothi et al. 1999; Zaviezo & Mills 1999). This was also seen in E. scutellatus, and is likely an advantage to the male in securing a female for mating immediately upon her emergence. The observed size differences between broods is likely due to differences in available resources and competition for food as the size of parasitoids is often related positively to host size (Wen et al. 1995; Fidgen et al. 2000;) and negatively to brood size (Hardy et al. 1992; Harvey et al. 1998).

Population Mortality

The rearing of E. scutellatus in the laboratory ended eight months after the colony was first established. Despite close care, the size of the population declined slowly without an obvious cause until the entire population died out. The highest mortality of E. scutellatus occurred in the larval stage. In a closely related species, Euplectrus plathypenae (Eulophidae), a similar pattern of mortality was observed (Parkman et al. 1981).

The demise of the colony may have been a result of adult female behavior or physiology. According to Schneider (1941), ovarial regression (ovarialkrise) “is a tendency toward ecological castration and may so decrease the readiness to oviposit that under laboratory conditions egg deposition does not continue” (in Flanders 1950). Ovarialkrise is considered characteristic of tropical wasps (in Flanders 1950). Similarly, phasic castration (atrophy of ovaries resulting in sterility) was frequently observed in laboratory mating studies of Chrysocharis laricinellae (Eulophidae) (Quednau 1967).

Most laboratory-reared wasp populations are sustainable when the females are provided with a source of honey and hosts for host-feeding, and the males are provided with honey water (Hagley & Barber 1992; Pitcairn & Gutierrez 1992; Zaviezo & Mills 1999). The brand of honey routinely used to rear E. scutellatus was replaced for a short duration of time with another brand, whereupon oviposition decreased. When the original brand of honey was restored, oviposition increased but failed to recover fully. It is possible the colony did not recuperate from the decline in female egg laying, but it seems unlikely that this was the cause of the death of the population. Synovigenic wasps such as E. scutellatus are capable of resorbing mature eggs (oösorption) should a food source become limited (Jervis & Kidd 1986).

Prior to the complete extirpation of the wasp colony, host caterpillars often turned black or bright red with yellow patches and sometimes developed a sweet odor, like that of citronella. Death of the host consequently resulted in the early death of the parasitoids. Several studies have concluded that the act of parasitoid oviposition can increase the host’s susceptibility to viral infections resulting in the death of the host and associated parasitoids (Irabagon & Brooks 1974; Levin et al. 1981; Eller et al. 1988). Ectoparasitic larvae also have been shown to compromise host immune systems (Richards & Edwards 1999). The larvae of an ectoparasitic koinobiont eulophid wasp, Eulophus pennicornis, are known to produce factors that decrease the number of host hemocytes in order to reduce the host immune response (Richards & Edwards 1999). A reduction in host defences could result in pathogenic infection and death of both the host and the larval parasitoids. Although no direct evidence of infection was obtained, this is a possible explanation for the death of the parasitoid colony.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Sincere gratitude is extended to Heather McAuslane (University of Florida), Tom Weissling (University of Florida), Robin Giblin-Davis (University of Florida), Ted Center (USDA/ARS) and Frank Bilz (USDA/ARS) for advice and expertise.

References Cited

  1. D. T. Anderson 1973. Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods. Pergamon Press, New York. 495 pp. Google Scholar

  2. W. H. Ashmead 1900. Report upon the aculeate Hymenoptera of St.Vincent and Grenada, with additions to the parasitic Hymenoptera and a list of the described Hymenoptera of the West Indies. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. London Part II-July::207–367. Google Scholar

  3. F. D. Bennett and I. W. Hughes . 1959. Biological control of insect pests in Bermuda. Bull. Entomol. Res 50::423–436. Google Scholar

  4. Z. Boucek 1977. Descriptions of two new species of Neotropical Eulophidae (Hymenoptera) of economic interest, with taxonomic notes on related species and genera. Bull. Entomol. Res 67::1–15. Google Scholar

  5. Z. Boucek 1988. Australasian Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera): A Biosystematic Revision of Genera of Fourteen Families, with a Reclassification of Species. C.A.B. International, Oxon, UK. 832 pp. Google Scholar

  6. Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute 1982. Integrated pest control programme in Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean, Progress Report October 1981-September 1982. Barbados; Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute. 13 pp. Google Scholar

  7. L. Ceresa-Gastaldo and E. Chiappini . 1994. Observations on the cocoon of Oligosita krygeri Girault (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) oophagous parasitoid of Cicadella viridis (L.) (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Norwegian J. Agr. Sci 16::131–140. Google Scholar

  8. C. P. Clausen 1940. Entomophagous Insects. McGraw-Hill Book Co. 688 pp. Google Scholar

  9. C. P. Clausen 1978. Hesperiidae. p. 192. In C. P. Clausen [ed.], Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook #480, Washington, D.C.  Google Scholar

  10. M. J W. Cock 1985. A Review of Biological Control of Pests in the Commonwealth Caribbean and Bermuda up to 1982. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 218 pp. Google Scholar

  11. S. Colazza and F. Bin . 1992. Introduction of the oophage Edovum puttleri Griss. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Italy for the biological control of Colorado Potato Beetle. Redia 75::203–225. Google Scholar

  12. G. Doury, D. Rojas-Rousse, and G. Periquet . 1995. Ability of Eupelmus orientalis ectoparasitoid larvae to develop on an unparalysed host in the absence of female stinging behaviour. J. Insect Physiol. 41::287–296. Google Scholar

  13. F. J. Eller, D. G. Boucias, and J. H. Tumlinson . 1988. Interactions between Microplitis croceipes(Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and a nuclear polyhedrosis virus of Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ. Entomol 17::977–982. Google Scholar

  14. J. G. Fidgen and E. S. Eveleigh . 1998. Life history characteristics of Elachertus cacoeciae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), an ectoparasitoid of spruce budworm larvae, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Entomol 130::215–229. Google Scholar

  15. J. G. Fidgen, E. S. Eveleigh, and D. T. Quiring . 2000. Influence of host size on oviposition behaviour and fitness of Elachertus cacoeciae attacking a low-density population of spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana larvae. Ecol. Entomol 25::156–164. Google Scholar

  16. S. E. Flanders 1938. Cocoon formation in endoparasitic chalcidoids. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer 31::167–180. Google Scholar

  17. S. E. Flanders 1950. Regulation of ovulation and egg disposal in the parasitic Hymenoptera. Can. Entomol 82::134–140. Google Scholar

  18. I. D. Gauld 1988. Evolutionary patterns of host utilization by ichneumonoid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae and Braconidae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc 35::351–377. Google Scholar

  19. I. D. Gauld and B. Bolton . 1988. The Hymenoptera, British Museum (Natural History). Oxford University Press, London. 332 pp. Google Scholar

  20. H. C J. Godfray 1994. Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press, NJ. 473 pp. Google Scholar

  21. E. A. Hagley and D. R. Barber . 1992. Effect of food sources on the longevity and fecundity of Pholetesor ornigis (Weed) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Can. Entomol 124::341–345. Google Scholar

  22. P. E. Hanson and I. Gauld . 1995. The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica. Oxford University Press, London. 893 pp. Google Scholar

  23. I. C W. Hardy, N. T. Griffiths, and H. C J. Godfray . 1992. Clutch size in a parasitoid wasp: a manipulation experiment. J. Animal Ecol 61::121–129. Google Scholar

  24. J. A. Harvey, L. E M. Vet, N. Jiang, and R. Gols . 1998. Nutritional ecology of the interaction between larvae of the gregarious ectoparasitoid, Muscidifurax raptorellus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), and their pupal host, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Physiol. Entomol 23::113–120. Google Scholar

  25. L. Hemerik and J. A. Harvey . 1999. Flexible larval development and the timing of destructive feeding by a solitary endoparasitoid: an optimal foraging problem in evolutionary perspective. Ecol. Entomol 24::308–315. Google Scholar

  26. L. O. Howard 1897. On the Chalcididae of the island of Grenada, B.W.I. J. Linnean Soc 26::129–178. Google Scholar

  27. T. A. Irabagon and W. M. Brooks . 1974. Interaction of Campoletis sonorensis and a nuclear polyhedrosis virus in larvae of Heliothis virescens. J. Econ. Entomol 67::229–231. Google Scholar

  28. M. A. Jervis and N. A C. Kidd . 1986. Host-feeding strategies in Hymenopteran parasitoids. Biol. Rev 61::395–434. Google Scholar

  29. H. K. Jyothi, G. Veeranna, and G. Bali . 1999. Biology and life table studies of Dirhinus anthracia Walker (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) a parasitoid of Exorista bombycis Louis (Diptera: Tachinidae) at various constant temperatures. J. Biol. Control 12::93–100. Google Scholar

  30. D. R. Kasparyan 1981. Ichneumonidae (Subfamily Tryphoninae) tribe Tryphonini. Fauna of the USSR 106::1–414. [English translation of Russian original published 1973, in Leningrad]. Google Scholar

  31. D. B. Levin, J. E. Laing, and R. P. Jacques . 1981. Interactions Between Apanteles glomeratus (L.) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and granulosis virus in Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Environ. Entomol 10::65–68. Google Scholar

  32. A. Le Ralec 1995. Egg contents in relation to host-feeding in some parasitic Hymenoptera. Entomophaga 40:187–93. Google Scholar

  33. K. E. MacDonald and S. Caveney . 2004. Unusual life history characteristics of Elachertus scutellatus Howard (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a koinobionic ectoparasitoid. Environ. Entomol 33:2227–233. Google Scholar

  34. W. R M. Mason 1967. Specialization in the egg structure of Exenterus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in relation to distribution and abundance. Can. Entomol 99::375–384. Google Scholar

  35. P. J. Mayhew and T. M. Blackburn . 1999. Does development mode organize life-history traits in the parasitoid Hymenoptera? J. Animal Ecol 68::906–916. Google Scholar

  36. M. B. Moore 1928. A study of the life history and habits under Florida conditions of the canna butterfly (Brazilian Skipper) Calpodes ethlius (Cramer): An insect pest of the canna. M.S. Thesis, University of Florida. Google Scholar

  37. J. A. Morales-Ramos, M. G. Rojas, and E. G. King . 1995. Venom of Catolaccus grandis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and its role in parasitoid development and host regulation. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer 88::800–808. Google Scholar

  38. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1998. Climatological Data Annual Summary: Florida. 102(13). Google Scholar

  39. P. Parkman, M. Shepard, and J. Powell . 1981. Oviposition biology and population dynamics of Euplectrus plathypenae Howard (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). J. Georgia Entomol. Soc 16::336–341. Google Scholar

  40. M. J. Pitcairn and A. P. Gutierrez . 1992. Influence of adult size and age on the fecundity and longevity of Tetrastichus incertus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer 85:153–57. Google Scholar

  41. J. E. Powell 1989. Food consumption by tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae reduced after parasitization by Microplitis demolitor or M. croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Econ. Entomol 82::408–411. Google Scholar

  42. F. W. Quednau 1967. Notes on mating behavior and oviposition of Chrysocharis laricinellae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a parasite of the larch casebearer (Coleophoralaricella). Can. Entomol 99::326–331. Google Scholar

  43. D. L J. Quicke 1997. Parasitic Wasps. Chapman & Hall, London. 470 pp. Google Scholar

  44. J. A. Reinert, T. K. Broschat, and H. M. Donselman . 1983. Resistance of Canna spp. to the Skipper Butterfly, Calpodes ethlius (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Environ. Entomol 12::1829–1832. Google Scholar

  45. E. H. Richards and J. P. Edwards . 1999. Parasitization of Lacanobia oleracea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) by the ectoparasitic wasp, Eulophus pennicornisEffects of parasitization, venom and starvation on host haemocytes. J. Insect Physiol 45::1073–1083. Google Scholar

  46. O. W. Richards and R. G. Davies . 1964. A General Textbook of Entomology Including the Anatomy, Physiology, Development and Classification of Insects. Butler & Tanner Ltd., London. 886 pp. Google Scholar

  47. F. Schneider 1941. Eientwicklung und Eiresorption in den ovarien des puppenparasiten Brachymeria euploeae West. (Chalcididae). Z. Angewandte Entomol 28::211–228. Google Scholar

  48. S. H. Scudder 1889. The Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada with Special Reference to New England. S. H. Scudder, Cambridge, MA. 1757 pp. Google Scholar

  49. M. R. Shaw 1981. Delayed inhibition of host development by the nonparalysing venoms of parasitic wasps. J. Invert. Path 37::215–221. Google Scholar

  50. D. S. Smith, L. D. Miller, and J. Y. Miller . 1994. Butterflies of the West Indies and South Florida. Oxford University Press. 264 pp. Google Scholar

  51. F. W. Urlich 1932. The arrowroot leaf roller (Calpodes ethlius). Trop. Agric 9:10299–300. Google Scholar

  52. B. Wen, D. K. Weaver, and J. H. Brower . 1995. Size preference and sex ratio for Ptermalus cerealellae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) parasitizing Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in stored corn. Environ. Entomol 24::1160–1166. Google Scholar

  53. A. M. Young 1982. Notes on the interaction of the skipper butterfly Calpodes ethlius (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) with its larval host plant Canna edulis (Cannaceae) in Mazatlan, State of Sinaloa, Mexico. New York Entomol. Soc 40::99–114. Google Scholar

  54. T. Zaviezo and N. Mills . 1999. Biological control aspects of the biology of Hyssopus pallidus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a parasitoid of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Environ. Entomol 28::748–754. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Developmental stages of Elachertus scutellatus: a) large, proteinaceous, anhydropic egg with a portion of the egg stalk intact (magnification × 200); b) 4-day-old larvae feeding on dead, necrotic host (magnification × 20); c) 5-day-old larvae have completed feeding and wandered from host prior to pupation. They will expel their gut contents and pupate within 24 h (magnification × 10); d) 4-day-old pupae after hardening and tanning their cuticle (magnification × 30); e) adult male wasp (magnification × 20) f) adult female wasp (magnification × 20)

i0015-4040-87-4-559-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

Video images of a freshly-ecdysed E. scutellatus pupa secreting fluid from the anus. When dry, this fluid will form a fibrous attachment, fastening the pupa to the inside of the host leafroll: a) abdomen of pupa is relaxed, some fluid has been expelled from the anus (indicated by arrow); b) abdomen of pupa is contracted, actively expelling fluid from anus (magnification × 20)

i0015-4040-87-4-559-f02.gif
Kimberley E. MacDonald and Stanley Caveney "EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT OF IMMATURE STAGES OF ELACHERTUS SCUTELLATUS (HYMENOPTERA: EULOPHIDAE) IN FLORIDA: THE FIRST NORTH AMERICAN RECORD," Florida Entomologist 87(4), (1 December 2004). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2004)087[0559:EMADOI]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 December 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top