Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2005 NECTAR SOURCES FOR LARRA BICOLOR (HYMENOPTERA: SPHECIDAE), A PARASITOID OF SCAPTERISCUS MOLE CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLOTALPIDAE), IN NORTHERN FLORIDA
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Larra bicolor (F.) (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) is an introduced biological control agent of pest Scapteriscus mole crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) in northern Florida. The pests are of southern South American origin. Larra bicolor is widespread in South America; the imported stock is from Bolivia. Its adults seem to require nectar sources. In South America, Puerto Rico (where it was also introduced from Brazil), and southern Florida (a separate introduction from Puerto Rico), the neotropical wildflower Spermacoce verticillata L. (Rubiaceae) has been observed to be a favored nectar source. In northern Florida (29°N) this wildflower is uncommon, freezes to the ground at first winter frost, and does not flower again until April-May. Nevertheless, where it has been planted in northern Florida, the wasps feed on it throughout the warmer months. Wasps were observed to feed at nectaries of 10 other plant species in northern Florida. Four of these other plants were compared experimentally with S. verticillata, but all received fewer visits from the wasps. Known disadvantages to the use of S. verticillata to augment L. bicolor are that it is not native to Florida, and that it grows vigorously in full sun when its roots are not immersed in water. It has been reported as a minor weed in southern Florida. However, it is the best alternative to attract L. bicolor to places where mole cricket control is needed.

Larra bicolor (F.) is a koinobiont ectoparasitoid of Scapteriscus spp. mole crickets in its native range in South America (Menke 1992). In 1936-1938 stock was imported from Belém, Pará, Brazil, to Puerto Rico, and established as a classical biological control agent of S. didactylus (Latreille) (Wolcott 1938, 1941a). In 1981, stock was imported from Puerto Rico by J. A. Reinert and established at Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, as a classical biological control agent of S. abbreviatus Scudder, S. borellii Giglio-Tos, and S. vicinus Scudder, all pests of South American origin (Sailer 1985). Stock of the same species was imported in 1988-89 from Santa Cruz, Bolivia, released and became established in and near Gainesville in northern Florida (Frank et al. 1995). The population established at the first Ft. Lauderdale site spread no more than 3 km, and attempts to redistribute it failed (Castner 1988). The stock established at Gainesville spread naturally, and has now been recorded in many counties in northern Florida, to a distance of >220 km NW and S (J. H. Frank, unpublished). It was assumed simply that stock obtained from Bolivia was a more cold-hardy biotype of L. bicolor (Frank et al. 1995) because Menke (1992) could not distinguish them at the species level from the Belém/ Puerto Rico stock by morphological methods. The possibility of cryptic species has not yet been investigated. However, Menke (1992) observed and illustrated what he believed to be intraspecific variation in punctation of the head capsule of the adults of L. bicolor from Belém/Puerto Rico and those from Bolivia. The L. bicolor established in northern Florida has the punctation of the latter stock (Frank et al. 1995).

Because of its assumed cold-hardiness, it seems likely that the Bolivian stock will spread far more widely in northern Florida. Knowledge of the nectar sources of L. bicolor is needed to devise methods of improving the rate of spread both state-wide and locally. Encouraging the establishment of plants that serve as nectar sources (wasp-gardening) could be used to enhance wasp populations, as has been done to manage other biological control agents (Jervis 1988; Jervis & Kidd 1996).

Wolcott (1941a) collected L. bicolor adults from flowers of Spermacoce verticillata L. (Rubiaceae) in Belém, and imported them into Puerto Rico, where this plant also grows (Liogier 1980). Wolcott (1941b) considered S. spermacoce essential to the survival of L. bicolor in Puerto Rico. In Florida, all sites where L. bicolor was released were prepared in advance with plantings of S. verticillata, which was already widespread in southern Florida, but very sparse farther north, reported only in Alachua and St. Johns counties (Wunderlin 1979, 1998). Wolcott (1941b) also mentioned Hyptis atrorubens Poit. (Lamiaceae) as a nectar source for L. bicolor in Brazil and Puerto Rico. This plant is not established in Florida (Wunderlin 1998). In southern Florida, Castner (1988) observed that S. verticillata outperformed various native and ornamental plants in attracting adult L. bicolor of the Belém/Puerto Rico stock.

This paper reports research to explore several questions regarding nectar sources of L. bicolor in northern Florida. Does this plant have weedy characteristics? What other plant species provide useful nectar sources for L. bicolor and might these further its range expansion throughout Florida? What other plant species may be used to encourage local buildup of L. bicolor populations? How does L. bicolor access nectar from S. verticillata, and can it do the same from other plant species?

Wunderlin (1998) states that S. verticillata is not native to Florida, but is native to the Neotropical region, including Cuba, Haiti, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, and the Bahamas. It was not detected as established in Florida until the 1960s (B. F. Hansen, pers. comm.).

In southern Florida S. verticillata flowers all year (Bryan Steinberg, pers. comm.). However, in northern Florida it does not flower all year; in Gainesville (29°N) it freezes to the ground at the first frost (typically in early December), and does not flower again until late April or early May of the following year (JHF, observations). This limits its availability as a nectar source in northern Florida. The limitation is of little consequence for Larra bicolor, whose pupae diapause underground in winter, and whose adults have been observed to be killed by frost (Cabrera-Mireles 2000).

Spermacoce verticillata contains a low level (0.2%) of alkaloids which would be toxic if present in higher concentrations, but it serves as a non-preferred forage plant for cattle (Francis 2002 and references therein).

Materials and Methods

Movement of Plants and Seeds (Weediness)

In 1990, one of us (JHF) planted a plot of S. verticillata plants (obtained from roadside waste land in Miami) in the grounds of the Entomology & Nematology Department, University of Florida and, in 1997-1998 planted five other plots (progeny of the first plot) on University of Florida property in the Gainesville area. These five were all planted by the same method; each had 25-26 plants installed in a single line, on 60 cm centers through a 2.6 × 16 m sheet of black polyethylene, 0.15 mm thick. Plantings were variously destroyed by prolonged flooding, maintenance crews, or a construction crew, so not all were constantly available. In 2000, a seventh was planted without mulch and in several rows by USDA collaborators at the USDA, Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology (CMAVE) garden. The seven plots were installed to allow study of the seasonality of the plant and the wasp in northern Florida, as well as to harvest wasps for distribution to distant localities. Collaborators were recruited to monitor for presence of wasps in distant counties in 2002 and 2003, and we supplied them with some of the plants. We know of no easier way of observing and collecting the wasps than their attraction to S. verticillata flowers, although they can be collected at traps baited with phenylacetaldehyde (Meagher & Frank 1998).

What other plant species provide useful nectar sources for L. bicolor and might these further its range expansion throughout Florida?

Three of the Spermacoce verticillata plots installed in 1997-1998 in the Gainesville, FL area were used for this 2001 study. They were at the Beef Cattle Research Unit, the Horse Teaching Unit, and the Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Department. A fourth, at the USDA-CMAVE garden had many more plants, in several rows, without plastic mulch. The plots constantly (during the warmer daylight hours) had feeding adult L. bicolor in September-November 2001.

Once every two weeks in September-November 2001, one of us (HAA) walked transects in the four cardinal and four secondary compass directions away from those four plots, until he was impeded by structures (buildings, fences, roads) or water bodies. Plants on which adult L. bicolor were seen feeding were identified and recorded. No attempt was made to analyze frequency of wasp-feeding observations because the observations were not random. The sole purpose was to compile a list of the plant species other than S. verticillata on which one or more L. bicolor adults were observed feeding in areas where S. verticillata maintained a wasp population.

What plant species may be used to encourage local buildup of L. bicolor populations?

Sites used were the Beef Cattle Research Unit, the G. C. Horn Turfgrass Research Laboratory, the Plant Sciences Unit at Citra, and the USDA-CMAVE garden. Four of the plant species identified as providing nectar to L. bicolor (Conoclinium coelestinum (L.) DC, Elephantopus elatus Bertol., Passiflora coccinea Aubl., and Solidago fistulosa Mill., see below) were available from local nurseries, and 32 of each were purchased in pots. Plants of S. verticillata were already in culture. All were planted in a completely randomized block design with four blocks. Each block was adjacent to one of the existing plots of S. verticillata to ensure that L. bicolor adults were present. The plants were removed from pots, planted through cuts made through a sheet of black polyethylene in the required block design, and watered daily for 5 days. Each plant was again watered once each 15 d with about 0.4 L of a 0.4% N10-P52-K10 fertilizer solution/suspension to promote flowering. Each of the blocks had five treatments (plant species), with eight plants per treatment, with each treatment in two lines of four. The separation between plants was 0.6 m within each treatment, and between treatments was 2.4 m, giving a block size of 92.8 m2. Observations were made weekly between late July and early November 2002. Repetitions were at 10, 11, and 12 AM (GMT-5). Data recorded were the total number of adult L. bicolor observed, when about 20 s were spent examining each plant. The routine used was for one observer (HAA) to move left to right and clockwise among the treatments, beginning with the plant in the southwest corner of the treatment and of the block. This was a repeated measures experiment with a completely randomized block design. Analysis was made by a χ2 pairwise comparison with the least square means (LSM) procedure with one degree of freedom. The data were adjusted to a Poisson distribution for analysis in the SAS (2000) program.

This experimental design was discussed with several researchers before it was put into operation. All recognized that each plant species has a different floral size and architecture, that the number of flowers produced by each plant varies in time, and perhaps nectar production varies within each plant. However, it was the time spent by L. bicolor at each plant that was to be compared, so it was not appropriate to try to control for interplant species differences that were inherent in the comparison--they are not flaws in the design. Our methods are described so that readers may accept the results or reject them, or repeat them.

How does L. bicolor access nectar from S. verticillata and other plants?

Adult L. bicolor were observed feeding at nectaries in the field. For 40 flowers of each of the four species (C. coelestinum, E. elatus, S. fistulosa, and S. verticillata) having floral nectaries, the distance from the rim of the corolla to the nectaries was measured in the laboratory under a dissecting microscope, as was the length of the glossa of 20 adult male and 20 female wasps.

Results

Movement of Seeds and Plants (Weediness)

An unrestrained plot of S. verticillata, planted in 1990 on the grounds of the Entomology/Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida by the end of 2003 had produced infrequent seedlings in adjacent, occasionally-mowed Bahiagrass turf, <1 m to the east, 2 m to the north, 2 m to the south, and ≈ 25 m to the southwest. Mowing of adjacent turf was by rotary mower, which, we suspect (1) prevented nearby seedlings from flowering and (2) dispersed seeds around a corner of a building only in a southwesterly direction and to a much greater distance. In other words, a plot of the plant produced seedlings to a distance of up to 2 m in 13 years, but use of a rotary mower discharged a few seeds up to ≈ 25 m in one direction, which was presumably due to the track of the mowing crew. Later plots were established in 1997-1998 through ≈ 2.6 × 16 m sheets of black polyethylene, whose original purpose was to allow establishment of the wildflower without competition from other plants. At the Beef Cattle Research Unit, after almost six years (fall 2003), there was only one seedling plant outside (by 5 cm) the confines of the original plot (outside the edge of the now-damaged plastic mulch). Mowing was done by a tractor-drawn reel mower, which may not have dispersed seeds. At the Horse Teaching Unit (after six years), there was spread by about 1 m to the south in places, but this probably was due to partial redistribution of the plot by a bulldozer moving it from its original line and destroying the plastic mulch. Evidently S. verticillata is not highly ‘invasive.’ Seedlings it produces in adjacent turf may be controlled by occasional mowing. These are appropriate characteristics for a nectar-source plant for a beneficial insect: it may spread, and, once established, it does not demand constant care for its survival. Furthermore, S. verticillata plants installed in 2000 at Tifton, Georgia, were killed outright, by inadvertent application of glyphosate (Roundup®) (W. G. Hudson, pers. comm.), suggesting that the plant is easily controlled by application of this chemical herbicide. In many places, its vigorous growth is desirable.

What other plant species provide useful nectar sources for L. bicolor and might these further its range expansion throughout Florida?

Larra adults were observed feeding at nectaries of 10 species of plants in addition to S. verticillata (Table 1). The number of Florida counties shown by Wunderlin & Hansen (2003) to be occupied by the plant in question is also shown in Table 1.

What other plant species may be used to encourage local buildup of L. bicolor populations?

Results of the experiment are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1. It is clear that L. bicolor adults spent much more time at S. verticillata plants than at any of the other four tested. We here assume this was due to its superiority as a nectar source. There were significant differences in all pairwise comparisons between plant species except between P. coccinea and S. fistulosa (where P = 0.7232).

How does L. bicolor access nectar from S. verticillata and other plants?

The length of the glossa in relation to the floral depth is shown in Fig. 2. There was no difference between length of the glossa of males and females (F = 0.20; df = 1,19; P = 0.6631). For two of the plant species, S. fistulosa (F = 80.54; df = 1,39; P < 0.001), C. coelestinum (F = 81.86; df = 1,39; P < 0.0001), the floral depth is less than the length of the glossa. In P. coccinea, the principal nectaries are extrafloral, and the measurement is irrelevant. The floral depth of S. verticillata matches the length of the glossa (F = 1.46; df = 1, 39; P = 0.2341). The floral depth of E. elatus seems too great to allow access by the wasp to nectaries (F = 498.02; df = 1,39; P < 0.0001). However, wasps were observed to extend mandibles, push the head into the flower, move the head from side to side, and thus access nectaries with the glossa. The petals are loosened from the corolla and typically fall as the wasp removes its head or leaves the flower.

Conclusion and Discussion

Although S. verticillata is not native to Florida, it is now widely distributed in the south of the peninsula (Table 1). Its floral nectaries are highly attractive to adult Larra bicolor wasps. It flowers, and presumably provides nectar, throughout the year in southern Florida, and for at least seven months of the year near Gainesville (29°N) in northern Florida. No other plant has yet been shown to rival it in Florida or Puerto Rico as an attractant for these wasps. It has potential for use in wasp-gardening, in which it is planted in plots intended to enhance local populations of Larra bicolor wasps to help control pest mole crickets. Its planting in areas not yet occupied by the wasp will pave the way for arrival, establishment, and beneficial effects of the wasp. Areas not yet occupied by the wasp are most likely (a) most of southern Florida, in part of which S. verticillata already is widespread, and (b) most of the Florida panhandle. Beneficial effects of this wasp may also be experienced in southern Georgia.

Vernacular names assigned to S. verticillata include ‘whitehead broom’ (Murphy et al. 1998, said to have been assigned by the Weed Science Society of America) and ‘shrubby false buttonweed’ assigned by Wunderlin (1998). The Puerto Rican common name botón blanco (= white button) was used by Francis (2002). The native Spermacoce assurgens Ruiz and Pavon (‘bushy buttonweed’) and non-native S. verticillata (‘whitehead broom’) are reported as weeds in turfgrass in the southern USA (Murphy et al. 1998). No golf course superintendent, extension agent, or rancher with whom we spoke recognized either of these two names (nor did they recognize the name shrubby false buttonweed). However, that publication alerts us to the ‘weediness’, somewhere, of S. verticillata.

We tried to find a native plant in northern Florida as attractive as S. verticillata to the wasp. This was done by searching the vicinity of established plots of S. verticillata for evidence of feeding on other plants, and then by experimental evaluation of relative attractiveness. We did not test the plants (mostly non-native) on which the native wasp Larra analis (F.) was reported by Smith (1935) to feed in Louisiana. That wasp attacks only the native mole cricket Neocurtilla hexadactyla (Perty). Further tests should be made of a wider range of plants, including those on which L. analis has been observed to feed, others on which L. bicolor has been observed to feed (Table 1), and native Florida species of Spermacoce.

Butterfly-gardeners routinely promote some non-native weedy plants such as Buddleia and Lantana species as nectar sources for butterflies, as well as others (Asclepias, Aristolochia, etc.) for host plants to draw interesting butterfly species. The crops protected are Cynodon dactylon (L.). Pers. and hybrids with C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davey (Bermudagrass, the major turfgrass in southern Florida), Paspalum notatum Fluegge (Bahiagrass, the major pasturegrass in Florida, and also used widely as a turfgrass), and numerous kinds of vegetable seedlings, none of which is native to Florida. We suggest that using a small percentage of the area of these crop plants to grow S. verticillata, another non-native plant, is much more sensible than using broad-spectrum chemical pesticides as the sole means of control of non-native pest mole crickets.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yongsung Joo (Department of Statistics, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Univ. Florida) for statistical advice, B. F. Hansen (Univ. South Florida) for interpreting conflicting botanical statements on the nativity of S. verticillata, Bryan Steinberg (Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center) for comments on the flowering period of S. verticillata in southern Florida, and W. G. Hudson (Univ. Georgia, Tifton) for information on the effect of glyphosate on S. verticillata. The U.S. Golf Association Green Section provided partial funding. We thank F. Slansky, Jr. and R. McSorley (Gainesville), and two anonymous reviewers for reviews of draft manuscripts. This is University of Florida, Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. R-10205.

References Cited

1.

H. Cabrera-Mireles 2002. Relationship between temperature and development of the ectoparasitoid Larra bicolor (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) and the endoparasitoid Ormia depleta (Diptera: Tachinidae). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida. Google Scholar

2.

J. L. Castner 1988. Evaluation of Larra bicolor as a biological control agent of mole crickets. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida. Google Scholar

3.

J. K. Francis 2002. Spermacoce verticillata. In J. K. Francis [ed.], Wildland Shrubs of the United States and its Territories: Thermic descriptions. General Technical Report IITF-WB-1. US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service. Also available online at < http://www.fs.fed.us/global/iitf/pdf/shrubs/Spermacoce verticillata.pdf>. Google Scholar

4.

J. H. Frank 1990. Mole crickets and other arthropod pests of turf and pastures. pp. 131-139 In D. H. Habeck, F. D. Bennett, and J. H. Frank [eds.], Classical Biological Control in the Southern United States. Southern Co-op. Ser. Bull. 355. Google Scholar

5.

J. H. Frank and J. P. Parkman . 1999. Integrated pest management of pest mole crickets with emphasis on the southern USA. Integr. Pest Manage. Rev 4:39–52. Google Scholar

6.

J. H. Frank, J. P. Parkman, and F. D. Bennett . 1995. Larra bicolor (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae), a biological control agent of Scapteriscus mole crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), established in northern Florida. Florida Entomol 78:619–623. Google Scholar

7.

M. A. Jervis 1988. Functional and evolutionary aspects of mouthpart structures in parasitoid wasps. Biol. J. Linn. Soc 63:462–493. Google Scholar

8.

M. A. Jervis and N. A C. Kidd . 1996. Phytophagy. pp. 375-394 In M. A. Jervis and N. A. C. Kidd [eds.], Insect Natural Enemies. Chapman and Hall, London. Google Scholar

9.

A. H. Liogier 1982. Flora of Puerto Rico and Adjacent Islands. A Systematic Synopsis. Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico; Rio Piedras, PR. Google Scholar

10.

R. Meagher and J. H. Frank . 1998. Larra bicolor (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Larrinae) collected in pheromone- and phenylacetaldehyde-baited traps. Florida Entomol 81:555–556. Google Scholar

11.

A. S. Menke 1992. Mole cricket hunters of the genus Larra in the New World (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Larrinae). J. Hymenoptera Res 1:175–234. [Larra americana Saussure is a synonym of L. bicolor (F.), so we use the latter name exclusively no matter what name was used by other authors cited]. Google Scholar

12.

T. R. Murphy, D. L. Colvin, R. Dickens, J. W. Everest, D. Hall, and L. B. McCarty . 1998. Weeds of Southern Turfgrasses. University of Florida. Google Scholar

13.

D. A. Nickle 1992. Scapteriscus borellii Giglio-Tos. The correct species name for the southern mole cricket in southeastern United States. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 94:524–526. [S. acletus Rehn & Hebard, cited by earlier authors in the USA, is a synonym of S. borellii, so we use the name S. borellii in this paper regardless of the name used by authors cited]. Google Scholar

14.

D. A. Nickle and J. L. Castner . 1984. Introduced species of mole crickets in the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands (Orthoptera; Gryllotalpidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 79:450–465. [Scapteriscus vicinus of Wolcott (1938, 1941a,b) and other 20th century Puerto Rican authors is, in fact, S. didactylus, so we use the latter name exclusively.]. Google Scholar

15.

R. I. Sailer 1985. Biological control of mole crickets. Natural enemies. pp. 23-32 In T. J. Walker [ed.], Mole Crickets in Florida. Agric. Exp. Stns, Univ. Florida, Bull. 846 (‘1984’). Google Scholar

16.

SAS Institute 2000. SAS/STAT user’s guide release 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar

17.

C. E. Smith 1935. Larra analis Fabricius, a parasite of the mole cricket Gryllotalpa hexadactyla Perty. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 37:65–87. [Gryllotalpa hexadactyla is now known as Neocurtilla hexadactyla.]. Google Scholar

18.

T. J. Walker and D. A. Nickle . 1981. Introduction and spread of pest mole crickets: Scapteriscus vicinus and S. acletus reexamined. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 74:158–163. [According to Nickle (1992), S. acletus Rehn & Hebard is a synonym of S. borellii, so we use the latter name regardless of the name used by authors cited.]. Google Scholar

19.

F. X. Williams 1928. Studies in tropical wasps--their hosts and associates (with descriptions of new species). Hawaiian Sug. Plrs’ Assoc. Exp. Stn. Entomol. Ser. Bull 19:1–179. Google Scholar

20.

G. N. Wolcott 1938. The introduction into Puerto Rico of Larra americana Saussure, a specific parasite of the “changa” or Puerto Rican mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus Scudder. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 22:193–218. [L. americana is a synonym of L. bicolor (Menke 1992), and the mole cricket was misidentified and is in fact S. didactylus (Nickle & Castner 1984).]. Google Scholar

21.

G. N. Wolcott 1941a. The establishment in Puerto Rico of Larra americana Saussure. J. Econ. Entomol 34:53–56.[This name is a synonym of L. bicolor (Menke 1992)].  Google Scholar

22.

G. N. Wolcott 1941b. The dispersion of Larra americana Saussure in Puerto Rico. Rev. Agric. Ind. Com. Puerto Rico 33:607–609. [This name is a synonym of L. bicolor (Menke 1992).]. Google Scholar

23.

D. Wunderlin 1979. Notes on Spermacoce and Mitocarpus (Rubiaceae) in southeastern United States. Phytologia 41:313–316. [Borreria verticillata is a synonym of Spermacoce verticillata, which occurs in Tropical America, Florida, Texas, and West Africa, so we use the name S. verticillata exclusively, regardless of the name used by authors cited above.]. Google Scholar

24.

R. P. Wunderlin 1998. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Google Scholar

25.

R. P. Wunderlin and B. F. Hansen . 2003. Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants. Available online at  http://www.plantatlas.usf.edu. Institute for Systematic Botany. University South Florida, Tampa [seen December 2003]. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Mean comparison for plant selection test made by Larra bicolor in the field. Data represent the average number of wasps per treatment per sampling ± SE. Bars with different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.005) according to chi-square pairwise comparisons under Poisson distribution.

i0015-4040-88-2-146-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

Mean comparisons of floral depth (distance to the nectaries) and the length of L. bicolor’;s glossa. Data with the same letter do not differ (α = 0.05) according to Duncan’s test. Nectaries of P. coccinea are extra-floral.

i0015-4040-88-2-146-f02.gif

Table 1. List of plants on which Larra bicolor adults were observed feeding in the Gainesville, Florida, area in 2001.

i0015-4040-88-2-146-t01.gif

Table 2.

Results of pairwise comparisons with the χ2 test to show frequency of feeding by adult L. bicolor at nectaries of the five plant species.

i0015-4040-88-2-146-t02.gif
H. A. Arévalo and J. H. Frank "NECTAR SOURCES FOR LARRA BICOLOR (HYMENOPTERA: SPHECIDAE), A PARASITOID OF SCAPTERISCUS MOLE CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLOTALPIDAE), IN NORTHERN FLORIDA," Florida Entomologist 88(2), 146-151, (1 June 2005). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2005)088[0146:NSFLBH]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2005
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top