Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2005 PATHOGENICITY OF METARHIZIUM ANISOPLIAE VAR. ACRIDUM TO THE FALSE SPIDER MITE BREVIPALPUS PHOENICIS (ACARI: TENUIPALPIDAE)
Bonifácio P. Magalhães, José C. V. Rodrigues, Drion G. Boucias, Carl C. Childers
Author Affiliations +

The flat mite, Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijkes), is a polyphagous pest found in many subtropical and tropical regions of the world (Childers et al. 2003). Brevipalpus phoenicis is recognized as the most economically harmful virus vector species in citrus areas where Citrus leprosis Virus (CiLV) has been reported. So far, chemical sprays have been the main approach adopted to control the mite in citrus (Rodrigues & Machado 2003). Otherwise, fungal pathogens are frequently found causing diseases and epizootics in mite populations (Alves 1998; Van Der Geest et al. 2000). Recently, the potential to control Brevipalpus populations by spraying with the fungus Hirsutella thompsonii Fisher was suggested (Rosas-Acevedo & Sampedro 2000; Rossi 2002). However, the development of H. thompsonii as a bio-acaricide has been hampered by difficulties in mass producing aerial conidia. In contrast, the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum Driver & Milner is easily produced in large scale and has been developed as a mycoinsecticide in several countries (Magalhães et al. 2000; Lomer et al. 2001). This fungus is tolerant of high temperatures, an important characteristic for pathogens developed for tropical agroecosystems. We studied the pathogenicity of M. anisopliae var. acridum against B. phoenicis to evaluate its potential use as an acaricide.

Mites used in this study were 5-15 days old adult females derived from clonal lineage established from a single female isolated from a mite colony collected from citrus in Plant City, Florida (Rodrigues et al. 2004). The fungus assayed was the isolate CG423 of M. anisopliae var. acridum, produced on SDAY medium, harvested, and dried according to Magalhães & Boucias (2004). The viability of the conidia used in the bioassays was determined by plate assay to be >95%. The bioassay unit was a 90-mm diameter Petri dish containing a 60-mm diameter plate glued to the bottom. A 1.5-cm diameter circular leaf arena clipped from Ligustrum lucidum Aiton was placed over a layer of cotton wool which was saturated with water. Twenty mites were transferred to the leaf arena. Two h later the pathogen was applied at a concentration of 108 conidia/ml in a 200-μl suspension applied by air flow with a pressure of 150 psi with the aid of a spray tower (Pereira 1991). Mite survival was monitored daily and infection confirmed by examining the specimens with an epifluorescence microscope. Dead mites were stained with Calcofluor White (Sigma) (1 mg/ml) for 30 min and washed three times. To prevent rapid fading, the stained material was immersed in a mounting medium containing DABCO (Sigma) (100 mg), glycerine (30 ml) and Hepes (10 ml) for microscopic examination.

In preliminary experiments, the mites were sprayed with fungus + 0.5% Tween 20 (v/v) (polyoxyethylenesorbitan monolaurate, P-1379 (Sigma)) in deionized water, water + 0.5% Tween 20, and control (no treatment). Each treatment was repeated five times. Observations showed very low survival rates (<23%) 24 h after treating the mites with the fungus + Tween 20 but also with the Tween 20 alone. Otherwise, the mortality rates in the controls (water treatment) were insignificant, indicating acaricidal activity by the wetting agent. Therefore, we tested the direct mortality to B. phoenicis with 0.5, 0.05, 0.005, 0.0005, and 0.00005% of Tween 20 to determine a safe concentration for subsequent studies. The results from a linear regression confirmed that mite survival was dependent on the Tween 20 concentration (P < 0.001) (Zar 1998). When Tween 20 was applied at a concentration 0.5%, survival at 24 h after inoculation was lower than 35%. In a separate experiment, similar mortality was observed when the leaf substrates were treated with Tween 20 prior to transferring the test mites (data not shown).

Survival of adult female mites treated with 0.00005% Tween 20 was not significantly different from the control and was therefore used in the fungal assays. The fungus was able to germinate and penetrate the treated adult female mites (Fig. 1). The SEM observations confirmed these findings. At 8 days post-treatment, the fungus caused 90% mortality (Fig. 2), where infection levels were confirmed by fluorescence microscopy.

Fungal infection also reduced the production of eggs by B. phoenicis females in comparison to treatments that received only Tween 20 or water (Table 1). These results are important and support the possibility of exploiting M. anisopliae var. acridum as a biological acaricide against B. phoenicis. Additional research is needed to determine the acaricidal effects of Tween 20 and similar products for false spider mite control.

This research was supported by the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station and EMBRAPA. The manuscript was approved for publication as Journal Series No. R-10508. We thank J. L. Capinera and J. Stimac, University of Florida for providing facilities and laboratory space. Thanks to J. L. Capinera and P. Inglis for reviews of this manuscript.

Summary

Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum Driver & Milner isolate CG423 was demonstrated to be pathogenic to the false spider mite Brevipalpus phoenicis Geijskes (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Effects on mite survival and egg production were assessed. The fungus was able to infect treated adult mites at least 4 days after inoculation and reached 90% mortality by the 8th day. We also demonstrated that Tween 20 shows acaricidal activity at low concentrations to B. phoenicis.

References Cited

1.

S. B. Alves 1998. Fungos entomopatogênicos. pp. 289-382 In S. B. Alves [ed.], Controle Microbiano de Insetos. 2 ed. Piracicaba-SP: Fealq, V.1. Google Scholar

2.

C. C. Childers, J. C V. Rodrigues, and W. C. Welbourn . 2003. Host plants of Brevipalpus californicus, B. obovatus, and B. phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) and their potential involvement in the spread of one or more viral diseases vectored by these mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol 30:29–105. Google Scholar

3.

C. J. Lomer, R. P. Bateman, J. L. Johnson, J. Langewald, and M. Thomas . 2001. Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers. Annu. Rev. Entomol 46:667–702. Google Scholar

4.

B. P. Magalhães and D. Boucias . 2004. The effects of drying on the survival of Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum conidiospores. J. Orthoptera Res 13:1155–159. Google Scholar

5.

B. P. Magalhães, M. Lecoq, M. R. Faria, F. G V. Schmidt, and W. D. Guerra . 2000. Field trial with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum against bands of the grasshopper Rhammatocerus schistocercoides in Brazil. Biocontrol Sci. Technol 10:427–441. Google Scholar

6.

R. M. Pereira 1991. Evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungus Beaveria bassiana on the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Florida. 135 pp. Google Scholar

7.

L. S. Rossi 2002. Seleção de fungos entomopatogênicos e infecção de Hirsutella sp. em Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes, 1939). M.S. Dissertation. University of São Paulo (ESALQ/USP). 92 pp. Google Scholar

8.

J. C V. Rodrigues and M. A. Machado . 2003. Virus-Brevipalpus-plant relationships on citrus leprosis pathosystems. pp. 768-770 In J. L. Albrigo [ed.], Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture Congr. 2000, Orlando, FL, Dec. 3-7. Vol. II. Google Scholar

9.

J. C V. Rodrigues, M. Gallo-Meagher, R. Ochoa, C. C. Childers, and B. J. Adams . 2004. Mitochondrial DNA and RAPD polymorphisms in the haploid mite Brevipalpus phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. (in press). Google Scholar

10.

J. L. Rosas Acevedo and L. Sampedro . 2000. Control biológico de Brevipalpus spp. en Citrus aurantifolia en Guerrero, México. Man. Int. de Plagas (Costa Rica) 55:56–59. Google Scholar

11.

L. P S. Van Der Geest, S. L. Elliot, J. A J. Breeuwer, and E. A M. Beerling . 2000. Diseases of mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol 24:497–560. Google Scholar

12.

J. H. Zar 1998. Biostatistical Analysis (4 ed). Prentice Hall. 929 pp. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

(A) Microphotograph of Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum infecting Brevipalpus phoenicis 3 days after inoculation by fluorescence microscopy. (B, C, and D) SEM of infection and colonization process. E) Control sprayed with water. (Cn = Conidium, Ap = Appressorium, Hf = Hypha).

i0015-4040-88-2-195-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

Survival curves of Brevipalpus phoenicis females treated with Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum suspended in Tween 20 and water. The fungus suspension was sprayed at concentration of 108 conidia/ml and 0.00005% Tween 20. Vertical bars = Standard Error.

i0015-4040-88-2-195-f02.gif

Table 1.

Egg production of Brevipalpus phoenicis females by the 4th day after inoculation with Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum. Average of five replicates.

i0015-4040-88-2-195-t01.gif
Bonifácio P. Magalhães, José C. V. Rodrigues, Drion G. Boucias, and Carl C. Childers "PATHOGENICITY OF METARHIZIUM ANISOPLIAE VAR. ACRIDUM TO THE FALSE SPIDER MITE BREVIPALPUS PHOENICIS (ACARI: TENUIPALPIDAE)," Florida Entomologist 88(2), 195-198, (1 June 2005). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2005)088[0195:POMAVA]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2005
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


Share
SHARE
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top