Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2007 PRESENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL DIET: EFFECTS OF COMPOSITION AND SIZE OF PREY AND DIET DOMES ON EGG PRODUCTION BY ORIUS INSIDIOSUS (HETEROPTERA: ANTHOCORIDAE)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The size of prey is critical to the feeding success of any given predator, but the effects of diet packet size have not been studied. We examined the effects of size of packets (Parafilm® domes) of artificial diet and the size of prey eggs on oviposition and mortality rates of Orius insidiosus (Say). Artificial diet was presented to adult female O. insidiosus in 10-, 25- and 50-μL domes for 6 d and rate of oviposition was measured for 24 h. Oviposition was highest after feeding on the 10-μL domes, decreased slightly on the 25-μL domes, and was significantly reduced on the 50-μL domes. The effect of capsule size was negated on the 25-μL and 50-μL diet domes when the diet was supplemented with E. kuehniella egg protein. Predators were also fed eggs of 4 species of Lepidoptera, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner), Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), and Heliothis virescens (Fabricius), ranging in volume from 19 ± 1.7 nL (mean ± SD) for P. interpunctella to 108 ± 21.3 nL for H. virescens eggs. Oviposition was highest and comparable on the E. kuehniella, P. interpunctella and H. virescens eggs and significantly less on S. frugiperda and H. virescens eggs. Oviposition positively correlated and mortality negatively correlated with weight-specific protein contents of the eggs, but neither correlated with egg volume. When all species of eggs were extracted and combined with diet in domes of constant size and constant protein content, only extracts of E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella eggs were more active than diet alone.

Artificial diets for predators have been presented in several forms without any regard for the size of the packaged diet. Semi- or fully liquid diets have been presented within paraffin wax capsules (1-2 mm diameter) (Hagen & Hassan 1965; Martin et al. 1978) or encapsulated in Parafilm® (Cohen & Smith 1998) for the green lacewing, Chrysoperla rufilabris (Stephens). Other diets for C. carnea have been presented on cellulose sponge (Vanderzant 1969; Hoosegow et al. 1989), and as uncovered capsules containing petroleum jelly and paraffin (Venkatesan et al. 2000). Four methods for presentation of liquid artificial diet for C. rufilabris (Burmeister) employed capillary tubes, cellulose sponge cubes, agarose-based jelly on coverslips, or artificial eggs (paraffin/petrolatum droplets on microscope slides) (Greenberg et al. 1994). The artificial eggs and agarose-based jelly showed the most promise. Diets for predaceous coccinellids were presented in gelled cubes (Atallah & Newsom 1966), as a powder, or as dry pellets (Smirnoff 1958; Niijima et al. 1977; Matsuka et al. 1982). Cohen (1985, 1992) and Cohen & Smith (1998) used Parafilm® to seal a semi-solid diet in the form of a sachet containing 50 mg of diet for C. rufilabris, and Grenier et al. (1989) used Parafilm® to seal foam cubes soaked with diet for the polyphagous predator Macrolophus caliginosus (Wagner). Arijs & De Clercq (2004) prepared a meat-based diet in cylindrical Parafilm® packets (1 cm long, 0.3 cm dia.).

In other studies, the form and materials used in diet presentation to predators were comparable, while size varied. With Parafilm® encapsulation, diet dome-size ranged from 50 μL/diet-dome for Orius insidious (Say) (Ferkovich & Shapiro 2004) to 40-500 μL/dome for Podisus maculiventrus (Say) (Shapiro et al. 2002; Wittmeyer & Coudron 2001). However, none of these studies specifically controlled for the effect of capsule size. We therefore varied the size of Parafilm® diet domes to test its effect.

In nature, prey size has been reported to impact the efficiency of predators (Evans 1976; Meiracker & Sabelis 1999; Anderson et al. 2001; De Clercq et al. 2002; Obrycki et al. 2005; Roger et al. 2000). Because O. insidiosus preys on the egg stage of numerous Lepidoptera, we examined the effect of the size of several species of prey-egg on oviposition (and presumptive feeding). In addition, because nutritional or phagostimulatory value of prey eggs may vary and differentially affect feeding and fecundity, we determined the effect of extracts of those eggs by adding them to artificial diet contained in domes of constant controlled size.

Materials and Methods

Insect Rearing

Insects for rearing and experiments were held in a growth chamber at 25.5 ± 1°C, 75 ± 5% RH, and a photoperiod of 15:9 (L:D). A Florida strain of O. insidious was reared on eggs of E. kuehniella (Beneficial Insectary, Redding, CA). The eggs were received frozen and held at -80°C until used. Insects were held in 1 pint-canning jars covered with ripstop nylon. The insects were provided water every other day as 1.2 mL of Hydrocapsules® (Analytical Research Systems, Gainesville, FL), 0.6 mL (3 mg) of E. kuehniella eggs, and 1 fresh green bean for oviposition. Green beans with eggs were removed every other day and placed in new jars with water beads, E. kuehniella eggs and 2 grains of bee pollen (purchased locally) for first-instars. Crumpled strips of wax paper were used as substrates. Following adult eclosion, the green bean was replaced and all green beans were checked for eggs every other day. Eggs in the beans were counted under a stereomicroscope, and beans with fewer than 400 eggs were added to each new jar to reduce cannibalism. A camel hair brush was used to remove the nymphs from the old green beans and to transfer the adults.

Prey Eggs

Eggs of E. kuehniella Zeller were purchased from Beneficial Insectary, Redding, CA and shipped on dry ice. Eggs of Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) were obtained from a laboratory colony of P. interpunctella reared as described by Silhacek & Miller (1972). Eggs of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), Spodoptera frugiperida (J. E. Smith), and Heliothis virescens (Fabricius) were reared as described by Burton (1969).

Artificial Diet

Diet was prepared under aseptic conditions in a clean room and encapsulated in stretched Parafilm® with a diet encapsulation apparatus (Analytical Research Systems, Gainesville, FL) as described by Ferkovich & Shapiro (2004). We refer to resulting capsules as domes, because they are hemispherical in shape. The original diet was prepared as described by Weiru & Ren (1989) for rearing Orius sauteri (Poppius) and consisted of 397 mg brewers yeast, 39.7 mg sucrose, 208 mg soy protein acid hydrolysate, 5.0 mg of 99% palmitic acid (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 49.5 mg chicken egg yolk, and 99.2 mg honey brought to 1.2 mL with distilled water. Palmitic acid was mixed with the egg yolk component before adding it to the diet. The resulting diet contained 273 mg protein/ml of diet as calculated from protein composition of the components (Souci et al. 1989).

Preparation of Egg Protein Extract

Soluble proteins were isolated from eggs of the 4 species of insects as described by Ferkovich & Shapiro (2004). Briefly, the eggs were homogenized in ammonium acetate buffer (pH 7.5), centrifuged at 20,200g, and the soluble fraction between the upper lipid layer and pelleted debris was collected. This fraction was then run through a centrifugal desalting column to remove compounds <5,000 MW, freeze-dried, and stored at -80°C. The freeze-dried desalted powder was then added to distilled water and analyzed for the quantity of soluble protein by the Lowry procedure (Protein Assay Kit, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) before mixing it into diet.

Bioassay of Diets

Adults that had eclosed within 24 h were selected from the colony for use in the bioassay. Each replicate consisted of 6 females and 4 males in a 100-mL plant tissue culture jar (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), with 4 replicates per treatment. In the first experiment, each jar contained 0.6 mL of Hydrocapsules®, either 3 mg of E. kuehniella eggs or two domes each containing 10, 25, or 50 μL of artificial diet or diet plus E. kuehniella egg extract (36 mg protein/ml), and 3 crumpled strips of wax paper (5 mm × 80 mm) as substrates. E. kuehniella eggs, Hydrocapsules, and treatment diets (artificial or insect eggs) were replaced daily and mortality was recorded. At the end of 6 d, one 7-cm section of green bean pod was placed in each jar for 24 h as an oviposition substrate. The number of females alive at the end of the oviposition period was recorded, eggs deposited in the green beans were counted under a stereomicroscope, and the number of eggs oviposited per 5 females was calculated. In the second experiment, the setup was the same, except that the treatment diets were made up of 3 mg of eggs of each species of prey, E. kuehniella, P. interpunctella, H. zea, S. frugiperda, and H. virescens added to each of the jars. The setup for the third experiment was identical except that each treatment diet consisted of protein (18 or 36 mg protein/mL of diet) extracted from one of 5 species of prey eggs and added to artificial diet in two 25-μL domes per jar.

Egg Measurements

Measurements of the eggs were made with a stereomicroscope with a 10× ocular micrometer calibrated with a 1-mm stage micrometer. The volumes of the eggs of H. zea, S. frugiperida, and H. virescens were calculated by the formula for a sphere, 4/3 π r3. Egg volumes for P. interpunctella and E. kuehniella were calculated by the formula for a prolate spheroid, 4/3 πab2 where a = the semi-major axis length and b = the semi-minor axis length.

Results

Oviposition was affected by feeding females on increasing sizes of diet domes, with or without added Ephestia egg protein (Fig. 1). Oviposition was highest in females fed on the 10-μL domes, 24% lower on the 25-μL domes (N.S.), and 85% lower on the 50-μL domes (P < 0.05). When domes were supplemented with E. kuehniella egg protein, there was no decrease in oviposition between 10- and 25-μL domes, and a 47% decrease on 50-μL domes (P < 0.05). Female mortalities following the 7-d bioassay on the 10-, 25- and 50-μL diet domes containing artificial diet were 29.1%, 33.3%, and 83.3%, respectively. On 10-, 25- and 50-μL diet domes with egg protein added to the diet, mortalities were 20.8%, 49.9%, and 70.8%, respectively. Female mortality on whole E. kuehniella eggs was 12.5%.

Fig. 2 shows the relative volumes of 5 species of prey eggs, protein content of prey eggs per mg of fresh weight, and resultant oviposition by O. insidiosus females feeding on the eggs. Plodia interpunctella and E. kuehniella eggs were the smallest, 19 ± 1.7 nL (mean ± SD) and 26.9 ± 3.4 nL, respectively; S. frugiperda eggs were of intermediate size, 61.3 ± 10.0 nL; and H. zea and H. virescens were the largest, 102.5 ± 10.6 nL and 107.6 ± 21.3 nL, respectively. The concentrations (μg/mg fresh wt) of protein in the eggs in were: E. kuehniella, 162; P. interpunctella, 122; H. virescens, 119; H. zea, 89; and S. frugiperda, 69. Oviposition was highest and comparable on the E. kuehniella, P. interpunctella, and H. virescens eggs and significantly less on H. zea and S. frugiperda eggs. Female mortality on the prey eggs was as follows: E. kuehniella, 8.3%; P. interpunctella, 8.3%; H. virescens, 8.3%; H. zea, 21%; and S. frugiperda, 29%. If protein extracted from E. kuehniella eggs was added to diet, oviposition of females fed on the 25- and 50-μL domes significantly increased over those without additional protein. However, oviposition was still reduced in those fed on 50-μL domes relative to 10- or 25-μL domes.

When the mean oviposition and mortality were regressed against prey-egg volume and protein content of eggs, neither oviposition nor mortality correlated with egg volumes (Fig. 3A), while both strongly correlated (mortality was inversely correlated) with protein content of eggs (Fig. 3B).

Only protein extracts from the E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella eggs significantly enhanced egg production when added to artificial diet (Fig. 4). The E. kuehniella extract improved egg production at both protein levels tested, whereas the P. interpunctella extract was only effective at the higher level. Female mortality on the diets supplemented with the egg protein from each species was as follows: E. kuehniella whole eggs, 12.5%; artificial diet, 37%; E. kuehniella extract (18 mg protein), 25%; E. kuehniella extract (36 mg), 21%; P. interpunctella extract (18 mg), 37%; P. interpunctella extract (36 mg), 33.3%; H. virescens extract (18 mg), 46%; H. virescens extract (36 mg), 37%; H. zea extract (18 mg protein), 46%; H. virescens extract (36 mg), 33%; and S. frugiperda extract (36 mg), 46%.

Discussion

The mode of presentation of an artificial diet is important in determining its acceptance by a predator (Cohen & Staten 1993; Grenier et al. 1994; Cohen 2004). Important issues in diet presentation include phagostimulants, texture, liquid or semi-solid state of the ingredients, and methods of containment. Cohen and Staten (1993) found that Geocoris punctipes fed longer when the diet format was changed from cylindrical artificial “larvae” to flattened packets made from stretched Parafilm®. Carpenter & Greany (1998) designed the encapsulation unit used in the present study, which is capable of forming diet domes of varied volumes from Parafilm®. De Clercq et al. (1998) evaluated 2 methods to present a meat-based diet to Podisus maculiventris (Say), and found that containing the diet in stretched Parafilm® sheets to form cylindrically shaped artificial larvae yielded better results than the gelled open form of the diet. They concluded that inferior results from the gelled form of the diet may be related to acceptability problems. Methods of diet containment have focused mainly on mechanized means of producing diet packets for mass production of predators such as Chrysoperla rufilabris (Cohen 2004), and little consideration has been given to the size and shape of the diet capsules.

Diet dome size clearly affected oviposition. Females that fed on 50-μL domes produced fewer eggs than those fed on 10- or 25-μL domes. One possible reason for this is that the digestive enzymes that the feeding predators injected into the prey eggs during feeding were diluted significantly in the larger domes. Cohen (1989) observed that G. punctipes varied their probing of artificial larvae while feeding, in a manner similar to probing different parts of their natural larval prey. During this feeding behavior they injected saliva containing digestive enzymes, initiating a process that he called extra oral digestion. Cohen and Smith (1998) attributed the success of their solid artificial diet to its accommodation of the extra oral digestive nature of predator feeding.

The addition of protein extract from E. kuehniella eggs, notably in females fed on the 50-μL diet domes, reduced the effect of the large dome size (Fig. 1). One possibility for the reduced effect is that phagostimulants may be present in prey-egg extracts. Chemoreception is an important means by which the insect detects food resources and oviposition sites (Nation 2002; Mowery et al. 2004). De Clercq et al. (1998) stated that a lack of feeding stimulants may be more important than a lack or poor balance of nutrients in a predator's diet. There are numerous reports in the literature on chemoreception by phytophagous insects (Chapman 2002); however, little information is available on predators and prey-associated phagostimulants. Cohen & Staten (1993) found that G. punctipes were attracted to green beans and induced the predators to aggregate and feed and drink for extended periods. Relatedly, chemical cues derived from larval prey of Spodoptera litura were found to elicit prey-locating behavior by the predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata (Yasuda 1997).

In analogy to the experiment on the effect of dome size on oviposition, we examined the effect of prey-egg size on oviposition. There was no correlation between prey-egg size and oviposition (Fig. 3A); however, weight-specific protein contents of prey eggs correlated directly with oviposition and inversely with mortality (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that the protein contents of eggs played critical roles in stimulating egg development and oviposition and in aiding survival. To further examine the effect of the egg protein, a constant amount from each species of egg was added to diet in domes of equal volume (Fig. 4). Only E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella egg extracts induced oviposition at a significantly higher rate than the control diet, suggesting that something nutritionally active in those eggs was lacking in other species. This relates to earlier studies in which we reported oviposition-stimulating activity in whole egg extracts of E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella (Ferkovich & Shapiro 2004a, 2005a), in embryonic cell lines from the two species (Ferkovich & Shapiro 2004b, 2005b; Ferkovich & Lynn 2005), in specific fractions from extracts of E. kuehniella (Ferkovich & Shapiro 2005a), and fractions from a P. interpunctella cell line (Ferkovich & Shapiro 2007).

Because we observed that O. insidious produced the most eggs on the smallest diet domes, we surmised that the predator would exhibit a preference for smaller prey eggs. Egg production was not only highest on the 2 smallest eggs (E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella) but also on the larger eggs of H. virescens. It appeared that the H. virescens eggs were either more attractive to the predators or better met the nutritional needs for yolk production than the other 2 species of large eggs, H. zea and S. frugiperda. Based on these results, we hypothesized that proteins extracted from H. virescens eggs would have activity similar to the E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella egg protein extracts when bioassayed (Ferkovich & Shapiro 2004, 2005). Bioassaying the 5 egg protein extracts at similar protein concentrations, however, revealed that the H. virescens protein extract did not have significant activity in the large diet domes (25 μL) as did the E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella extracts. This indicated that either nutrients other than proteins or some other factor(s) was responsible for the increase in oviposition rate we observed with whole H. virescens eggs. Numerous reports indicate that feeding different prey to predators can affect their fecundity and other biological characters of predators because of differences in the nutritional values of the prey (Chyzik et al. 1995; Thompson & Hagen 1999; De Clercq et al. 1998; Roger et al. 2000; Torres et al. 2004; Venzon et al. 2001; Specty et al. 2003).

In conclusion, O. insidious oviposited at a higher rate when control diet was presented to them in small domes rather than larger domes, suggesting higher consumption rates. This effect could be overridden by adding a protein extract from either E. kuehniella or P. interpunctella eggs, likely because the extract made the diet more attractive to the predators. Alternatively, the extract may have contained enzymes that aided digestion of the diet. Although females fed intact eggs from H. virescens had oviposition rates similar to those fed eggs from E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella, females fed diet with extracts from H. virescens eggs did not show significantly higher oviposition rates. We cannot explain this discrepancy. Identification of the active substance in the E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella extracts should provide a better understanding of why these extracts are active. Once the active components are identified they may prove to be useful in improving artificial diets for Orius species.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Terry Arbogast for helpful review of an earlier draft. We thank Dr. Patrick Greany for his review and valuable insight into interpretation of some of the data. We appreciate the excellent technical assistance of Delaine Miller in this study.

References Cited

1.

Y. Arijs and P. De Clercq . 2004. Liver-based artificial diets for the production of Orius laevigatus. Biocontrol 49:505–516. Google Scholar

2.

Y. H. Atallah and L. D. Newsom . 1966. Ecological and nutritional studies on Coleomegilla maculata De Geer (Coleo. Coccinellidae). I. The development of an artificial diet and a laboratory rearing technique. J. Econ. Entomol 59:1175–1179. Google Scholar

3.

N. H. Anderson 1961. Life-histories of some British Anthocoris (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) with special references to food requirements and feeding habits. Ph.D. Dissertation, London Univ. Google Scholar

4.

R. L. Burton 1969. Mass-rearing of the corn earworm in the laboratory. U.S. Depart. Agric. ARS (Report) Series. 33-134. Google Scholar

5.

J. E. Carpenter and P. D. Greany . 1998. Comparative development and performance of artificially reared versus host-reared Diapetimorpha introita (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) wasps. Biol. Control:11:203–208. Google Scholar

6.

R. F. Chapman 2003. Contact chemoreception in feeding by phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol 48:455–484. Google Scholar

7.

R. Chyzik, M. Klein, and Y. Ben Dov . 1995. Reproduction and survival of the predatory bug Orius albidipennis on various arthropod prey. Entomol. Exp. Appl 75:27–31. Google Scholar

8.

A. C. Cohen 1985. Simple method for rearing the insect predator Geocoris punctipes (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) on a meat diet. J. Econ. Entomol 78:1173–1175. Google Scholar

9.

A. C. Cohen 1989. Ingestion efficiency and protein consumption by a heteropteran predator. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 82:495–499. Google Scholar

10.

A. C. Cohen 1992. Using a systematic approach to develop artificial diets for predators. pp. 77-92 In T. E. Anderson and N. C. Leppla [eds.], Advances in Insect Rearing for Research and Pest Management. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. Google Scholar

11.

A. C. Cohen 2004. Insect Diets Science and Technology. CRC Press, New York. 324 pp. Google Scholar

12.

A. C. Cohen and L. K. Smith . 1998. A new concept in artificial diets for Chrysoperla rufilabris: The efficacy of solid diets. Biol. Control 13:49–54. Google Scholar

13.

A. C. Cohen and R. T. Staten . 1993. Long-term culturing and quality assessment of predatory big-eyed bugs, Geocoris punctipes. pp. 122-132 In S. K. Narang, A. C. Bartlett, and R. M. Faust [eds.], Applications of Genetics to Arthropods of Biological Control Significance. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar

14.

P. De Clercq, F. Merlevede, and L. Tirry . 1998. Unnatural prey and artificial diets for rearing Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Biol. Control 12:137–142. Google Scholar

15.

P. De Clercq, K. Wyckhuys, H. N. De Oliveira, and J. Klapwijk . 2002. Predation by Podisus maculiventris on different life stages of Nezara viridula. Florida Entomol 85:197–202. Google Scholar

16.

A. F G. Dixon and J. L. Hemptinne . 2000. Body size distribution in predatory ladybird beetles reflects that of their prey. Ecol 82:1847–1856. Google Scholar

17.

H. F. Evans 1976. The role of predator-prey size ratio in determining the efficiency of capture by Anthocoris nemorum and the escape reactions of its prey, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Ecol. Entomol 1:85–90. Google Scholar

18.

S. M. Ferkovich and D. E. Lynn . 2005. Enhanced egg laying in adult predators fed artificial diet supplemented with an embryonic cell line derived from eggs of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Florida Entomol 88:329–331. Google Scholar

19.

S. M. Ferkovich and J. P. Shapiro . 2004a. Comparison of prey-derived and non-insect supplements on egg-laying of Orius insidious maintained on artificial diet as adults. Biol. Control 31:57–64. Google Scholar

20.

S. M. Ferkovich and J. P. Shapiro . 2004b. Increased egg-laying in Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) fed artificial diet supplemented with an embryonic cell line. Biol. Control 31:11–15. Google Scholar

21.

S. M. Ferkovich and J. P. Shapiro . 2005a. Enhanced oviposition in the insidious flower bug, Orius insidious (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) with a partially purified nutritional factor from prey eggs. Florida Entomol 88:253–257. Google Scholar

22.

S. M. Ferkovich and J. P. Shapiro . 2005b. Erratum to “Increased egg-laying in Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) fed artificial diet supplemented with an embryonic cell line”. in Biol. Control 31: 11-15. Biol. Control 32:181. Google Scholar

23.

S. M. Ferkovich and J. P. Shapiro . 2005c. Erratum to “Comparison of prey-derived and non-insect supplements on egg-laying of Orius insidiosus maintained on artificial diet as adults”. in Biol. Control 31: 57-64. Biol. Control 32:180. Google Scholar

24.

S. M. Ferkovich and J. P. Shapiro . 2007. Improved fecundity in the predator Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) with a partially purified nutritional factor from an insect cell line. Florida Entomol 90:321–326. Google Scholar

25.

S. M. Greenberg, D. A. Nordland, and E. G. King . 1994. Influence of different larval feeding regimes and diet presentation methods on Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) development. J. Entomol. Sci 29:513–522. Google Scholar

26.

S. Grenier, P. D. Greany, and A. C. Cohen . 1994. Potential for mass release of insect parasitoids and predators through development of artificial culture techniques. pp. 181-206 In D. Rosen, F. D. Bennett, and J. L. Capinera [eds.], Pest Management in the Subtropics: Biological Control--A Florida Perspective. Intercept. Andover, Hants, UK. Google Scholar

27.

S. B. Grenier, B. Guillaud, B. Delible, and G. Bonnet . 1989. Nutrition et élevage du prédateur polyphage Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera, Miridae) sur milieeux artificiels. Entomophaga 34:77–86. Google Scholar

28.

K. S. Hagen and R. L. Hassan . 1965. A method of providing artificial diets to Chrysopa larvae. J. Econ. Entomol 58:999–1000. Google Scholar

29.

M. Hoosegow, K. Niijima, and M. Matsuka . 1989. Rearing Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on chemically defined diets. Appl. Entomol. Zool 24:96–102. Google Scholar

30.

P. B. Martin, R. L. Ridgeway, and C. E. Schuetze . 1978. Physical and Biological evaluations of an encapsulated diet for rearing Chrysopa carnea. Florida Entomol 61:145–152. Google Scholar

31.

M. Matsuka, M. Wantanabe, and K. Niijima . 1982. Longevity and oviposition of vedalia beetles on artificial diets. Environ. Entomol 11:816–819. Google Scholar

32.

R. A Fvan den Meiracker and M. W. Sabelis . 1999. Do functional responses of predatory arthropods reach a plateau? A case study of Orius insidious with western flower thrips as prey. Entomol. Exp. Appl 90:323–329. Google Scholar

33.

S. V. Mowery, J. F. Cambell, M. A. Mullen, and A. B. Broce . 2004. Response of Oryzaephilus surinamensis (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) to food odor emanating through consumer packaging films. Environ. Entomol 33:75–80. Google Scholar

34.

J. L. Nation 2002. Insect Physiology and Biochemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 485 pp. Google Scholar

35.

K. Niijima, R. Nishimura, and M. Matsuka . 1977. Nutritional studies of an aphidophagous coccinellid, Harmonia axyridis. 3. Rearing of larvae using a chemically defined diet and fractions of drone honey-bee powder. Bull Fac. Agric. Tamagawa Univ 17:45–51. Google Scholar

36.

J. J. Obrycki, M. J. Tauber, C. A. Tauber, and J. R. Ruberson . 1995. Prey specialization in insect predators. Univ. Minnesota,  http://ipmworld.umn.edu/chapters/obrycki.htmGoogle Scholar

37.

C. Roger, D. Coderre, and G. Boivin . 2000. Differential prey utilization by the generalist predator Colemegilla maculata lengi according to prey size and species. Entomol. Exp. Appl 94:3–13. Google Scholar

38.

J. P. Shapiro, H. A. Wasserman, P. D. Greany, and J. L. Nation . 2000. Vitellin and vitellogenin in the soldier bug, Podisus maculiventris: Identification with monoclonal antibodies and reproductive response to diet. Arch. Insect Biochem.Physiol 44:130–135. Google Scholar

39.

J. P. Shapiro and S. M. Ferkovich . 2002. Yolk protein immunoassays (YP-ELISA) to assess diet and reproductive quality of mass-reared Orius insidious (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). J. Econ. Entomol 95:927–935. Google Scholar

40.

D. L. Silhacek and S. G. Miller . 1972. Growth and development of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella, under laboratory mass rearing conditions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 65:1084–1087. Google Scholar

41.

W. A. Smirnoff 1958. An artificial diet for rearing coccinellid beetles. Canadian Entomol 90:563–565. Google Scholar

42.

S. W. Souci, W. Fachmann, and H. Kraut . 1989. Food Composition and Nutrition Tables. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar

43.

O. Specty, G. Febvay, S. Grenier, B. Delible, C. Piotte, J. Pageaux, A. Ferran, and J. Guillaud . 2003. Nutritional plasticity of the predatory ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): comparison between natural and substitution prey. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 52:81–91. Google Scholar

44.

S. N. Thompson and K. S. Hagen . 1999. Nutrition of entomophagous insects and other arthropod. pp. 594-652 In T. S. Bellows, T. W. Fisher [eds.] Handbook of Biological Control Principles and Applications of Biological Control. Academic Press, New York.  Google Scholar

45.

J. B. Torres, C. S A. Silva-Torres, and J. R. Robertson . 2004. Effect of two prey types on life-history characteristics and predation rate of Geocoris floridanus (Heteroptera: Geocoridae). Biol. Cont 33:964–974. Google Scholar

46.

E. S. Vanderzant 1969. An artificial diet and a rearing method for Chrysopa carnea larvae and adults. J. Econ. Entomol 62:256–257. Google Scholar

47.

T. Venkatesan, S. P. Singh, and S. K. Jalali . 2000. Rearing of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on semi-synthetic diet and its predatory efficiency against cotton pests. Entomon 25 81–89. Google Scholar

48.

M. Venzon, A. Janssen, and M. W. Sabelis . 2002. Prey preference and reproductive success of the generalist predator Orius laevigatus. Oikos 97:116–124. Google Scholar

49.

Z. Weiru and W. Ren . 1989. Rearing of Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthrocoridae) with natural and artificial diets. Chinese J. Biol. Control 5:9–12. Google Scholar

50.

J. L. Wittmeyer and T. A. Coudron . 2001. Life table parameters, reproductive rate, intrinsic rate of increase, and estimated cost of rearing Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on artificial diet. J. Econ. Entomol 94:61344–1352. Google Scholar

51.

T. Yasuda 1997. Chemical cues form Spodoptera litura larvae elicit prey-locating behavior by the predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcella. Entomol. Exp. Appl 82:349–354. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Effect of size of diet domes on rate of oviposition (mean ± SEM, n = 4) by predators fed artificial diet with and without E. kuehniella egg protein extract (29 mg protein/mL diet). Percentages indicated on bars represent mortalities. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different by ANOVA and multiple range test (Newman-Keuls method, P > 0.05)

i0015-4040-90-3-502-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

Oviposition rate of O. insidious females fed whole prey eggs (mean ± SEM; n = 4), in relation to volumes (mean ± SEM; n = 5) and weight-specific protein content of prey eggs (μg/mg fresh weight). Prey species: E. kuehniella (Ek), P. interpunctella (Pi), H. zea (Hz), S. frugiperida (Sf), and H. virescens (Hv). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (Newman-Keuls method, P > 0.05)

i0015-4040-90-3-502-f02.gif

Fig. 3.

Regressions on the means of oviposition and mortality vs. (A) prey-egg volume; and (B) weight-specific protein content

i0015-4040-90-3-502-f03.gif

Fig. 4.

Effect of supplementing diet with protein extracts from 4 species of prey eggs on oviposition rates (mean ± SEM, n = 4). Only the higher concentration of Sf was run. Dunnett's test was used to compare the amended treatment diets against the Diet (control); asterisk indicates that the treatment means were significantly different from Diet (control) (P < 0.05)

i0015-4040-90-3-502-f04.gif
Stephen M. Ferkovich, Thiruvengadam Venkatesan, Jeffrey P. Shapiro, and James E. Carpenter "PRESENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL DIET: EFFECTS OF COMPOSITION AND SIZE OF PREY AND DIET DOMES ON EGG PRODUCTION BY ORIUS INSIDIOSUS (HETEROPTERA: ANTHOCORIDAE)," Florida Entomologist 90(3), 502-508, (1 September 2007). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2007)90[502:POADEO]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 September 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top