Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2007 Exposure to the Ripe Fruit of Tropical Almond Enhances the Mating Success of Male Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Todd E. Shelly, James Edu
Author Affiliations +

Males of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), are strongly attracted to methyl eugenol (Howlett 1915), a phenylpropanoid compound found in over 200 plant species representing 32 families (Tan & Nishida 1996). After ingesting the compound, B. dorsalis males sequester break-down products of methyl eugenol in the rectal gland and use these metabolites to synthesize a sex pheromone attractive to females (Nishida et al. 1988). Subsequent studies (Shelly & Dewire 1994; Tan & Nishida 1996) confirmed that males fed methyl eugenol produce a more attractive pheromonal signal and enjoy a higher mating success than control males denied access to the chemical. Importantly, other studies showed that feeding by B. dorsalis males on natural sources of methyl eugenol likewise conferred a mating advantage (Nishida et al. 1997--Fagraea berteroana A. Gray, pua kenikeni, Loganiaceae; Shelly 2000--Cassia fistula L., golden shower tree, Fabaceae; Shelly 2002--Carica papaya L., papaya, Caricaceae). The purpose of this study was to determine whether exposure to the fruits and leaves of the methyl eugenol-bearing (Siderhurst & Jang 2006a, 2006b) plant Terminalia catappa L. (tropical or Indian almond, Combretaceae) similarly confers a mating advantage to B. dorsalis males.

The flies used in this study were from a laboratory colony started with 600-800 adults reared from field-collected guava fruits (Psidium guajava L., common guava, Myrtaceae). The colony was housed in a screen cage with superabundant food (a mixture of sugar and yeast hydrolysate, 3:1 w/w) and water; ripe papayas were provided for oviposition. Adults were separated by sex within 24 h of emergence, placed in holding buckets (5 L volume, 100-125 flies per bucket), and provided the sugar-yeast diet and water. The flies were held at 22-26°C and 55-85% RH. Flies used in this study were four generations removed from the wild.

Three separate treatments were conducted in which males exposed to ripe (yellow) fruits, unripe (green) fruits, or leaves, respectively, competed against non-exposed males for females in field-cage trials. Siderhurst and Jang (2006b) reported that methyl eugenol was present at 1.3 μg/mL of pressed juice from ripe fruits and at a trace amount too low for measurement in the leaves. For exposure, we transferred 90-100 mature males (20-25 d old) to a screen cage (30 cm cube) and introduced 10 fruits ((∼5 cm long) or 2 leaves (∼25 cm long, 15 cm wide), all of which were collected from the same tree at the University of Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Waimanalo, within 1 h of use. Exposure commenced between 1000-1030 h and lasted 2 h. At that time, the fruits or leaves (and the paper towel upon which they were placed) were removed, food and water were introduced, and the males were left in the cage until testing 2 d later.

Trials were conducted in nylon-screen field-cages (2.5 m height, 3 m diameter) at the USDA-ARS laboratory, Honolulu. Each field-cage contained 2 artificial trees (2 m tall) used to eliminate potentially confounding effects of plant chemistry on fly behavior. Within a given field-cage, we introduced 75 exposed males, 75 non-exposed males, and 75 females (all flies were 22-28 d when tested). Non-exposed males were marked one day before testing by chilling them in a refrigerator and then applying enamel paint to the thorax. Males recovered quickly from handling, and no adverse effects were apparent. Flies were released into the field-cages 3-4 h before dusk (the period of sexual activity), and mating pairs were collected over a 90-min period starting 60 min before sunset. For each treatment, we conducted 2 trials per day over 4 d for a total of 8 replicates. The numbers of matings achieved by exposed and non-exposed males were compared by a t-test as parametric assumptions were met for all 3 treatments.

Males exposed to ripe fruit obtained significantly more matings than non-exposed males, while males exposed to unripe fruits or leaves did not display significantly higher mating success than non-exposed males (Fig. 1). On average, males exposed to ripe fruits obtained 68% of the total matings per replicate, whereas males exposed to unripe fruits or leaves obtained only slightly more than 50% of the total matings (56% and 53%, respectively).

The present study identifies the fourth methyl eugenol-bearing plant species that enhances the mating success of B. dorsalis males. Other studies on B. dorsalis (Tan et al. 2006) or closely related species in the dorsalis complex (Tan et al. 2002; Nishida et al. 2004) showed sequestration of pheromone precursors following feeding on methyl eugenol-containing orchids (genus Bulbophyllum, Orchidaceae), but follow-up mating tests were not conducted. While these results suggest that methyl eugenol-bearing plants uniformly (i.e., independently of taxonomic affiliation) boost the mating ability of B. dorsalis males, evaluating the validity of this generalization requires additional data. Further studies on B. dorsalis will also sharpen comparisons with other methyl eugenol-responding Bactrocera species, in which the influence of methyl eugenol on male mating success is apparently less pronounced (e.g., B. cacuminata (Hering), Raghu & Clarke 2003).

We thank Eric Jang for reviewing the paper.

Summary

Mating trials conducted in field tents showed that males of B. dorsalis exposed to ripe fruits of the tree T. catappa obtained significantly more matings than non-exposed males. Exposure to unripe fruits or leaves did not similarly enhance male mating success.

References Cited

1.

F. M. Howlett 1915. Chemical reactions of fruit flies. Bull. Entomol. Res 6:297–305. Google Scholar

2.

R. Nishida, K. H. Tan, M. Serit, N. L. Lajis, A. M. Sukari, S. Takahashi, and H. Fukami . 1988. Accumulation of phenylpropanoids in the rectal glands of males of the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis. Experientia 44:534–536. Google Scholar

3.

R. Nishida, T. E. Shelly, and K. Y. Kaneshiro . 1997. Acquistion of female attractive fragrance by males of the oriental fruit fly from a Hawaiian lei flower, Fagraea berteriana. J. Chem. Ecol 23:2275–2285. Google Scholar

4.

R. Nishida, K. H. Tan, S. L. Wee, A. K W. Hee, and Y. C. Toong . 2004. Phenylpropanoids in the fragrance of the fruit fly orchid, Bulbophyllum cheiri, and their relationship to the pollinator, Bactrocera papayae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol 32:245–252. Google Scholar

5.

S. Raghu and A. R. Clarke . 2003. Sexual selection in a tropical fruit fly: role of a plant derived chemical in mate choice. Entomol. Exp. Appl 108:53–58. Google Scholar

6.

T. E. Shelly 2000. Flower-feeding affects mating performance in male oriental fruit flies, Bactrocera dorsalis. Ecol. Entomol 25:109–114. Google Scholar

7.

T. E. Shelly 2002. Feeding on papaya flowers enhances mating competitiveness of male oriental fruit flies Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc 35:41–47. Google Scholar

8.

T. E. Shelly and A. M. Dewire . 1994. Chemically mediated mating success in male Oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 87:375–382. Google Scholar

9.

M. S. Siderhurst and E. B. Jang . 2006a. Female-based attraction of Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), to a blend of host fruit volatiles from Terminalia catappa L. J. Chem. Ecol 32:2513–2524. Google Scholar

10.

M. S. Siderhurst and E. B. Jang . 2006b. Attraction of female oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, to Terminalia catappa fruit in wind tunnel and olfactometer tests. Formosan Entomol. 26:45–55. Google Scholar

11.

K. H. Tan and R. Nishida . 1996. Sex pheromone and mating competition after methyl eugenol consumption in the Bactrocera dorsalis complex. pp. 147-153 In B. A. McPheron and G. J. Steck [eds.], Fruit Fly Pests: A World Assessment of Their Biology and Management. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL. Google Scholar

12.

K. H. Tan, R. Nishida, and Y. C. Toong . 2002. Floral synomone of a wild orchid, Bulbophyllum cheiri, lures Bactrocera fruit flies for pollination. J. Chem. Ecol 28:1161–1172. Google Scholar

13.

K. H. Tan, L. T. Tan, and R. Nishida . 2006. Floral phenylpropanoid cocktail and architecture of Bulbophyllum vinaceum orchid in attracting fruit flies for pollination. J. Chem. Ecol 32:2429–2441. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Number of matings obtained by Bactrocera dorsalis males exposed to ripe fruits, unripe fruits, or leaves of the tropical almond Terminalia catappa or not exposed to any part of this plant. Bar height represents the average number of matings per replicate; error bar represents ± 1 SE. Eight replicates were performed for all 3 treatments. Results of t-test comparing exposed and non-exposed males are presented, where *** represents P < 0.001 and NS represents P > 0.05.

i0015-4040-90-4-757-f01.gif
Todd E. Shelly and James Edu "Exposure to the Ripe Fruit of Tropical Almond Enhances the Mating Success of Male Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)," Florida Entomologist 90(4), 757-758, (1 December 2007). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2007)90[757:ETTRFO]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 December 2007
Back to Top