Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2008 Performance of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on Healthy and Cotton Leaf Curl Virus Infected Cotton
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) is a group of whitefly-transmitted Geminiviruses that cause extensive damage to cotton in India and Pakistan. Begomoviruses have a complex association with their whitefly vector. To further understand these relationships, fecundity and life history parameters of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) were compared on 5, 20, 35 d post inoculated (DPI), CLCuV infected and healthy cotton plants to determine the effect of virus on its vector. Cotton leaf curl virus infection increased percent egg viability of B. tabaci. Whiteflies deposited significantly fewer eggs on virus infected plants compared to healthy plants. The development time of whiteflies from egg to adulthood was significantly reduced on CLCuV infected plants with shorter nymphal and pupal duration. Male and female whiteflies had shorter longevity on CLCuV infected plants compared with healthy plants. The egg duration was similar on CLCuV infected and healthy plants regardless of DPI of plants.

Plant pathogen-vector systems are characterized by complex direct and indirect interactions (Byrne & Bellows 1991a; Blair et al. 1995). The interactions between plant-pathogenic viruses and their insect vectors range from the insect functioning as a casual carrier to intimate molecular interactions (Nault 1997). The Geminiviruses are a large and diverse family of viruses that infect a wide range of important crop species. This family is divided into 3 genera: Mastrevirus, Curtovirus and Begomovirus. Begomoviruses are transmitted by the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius).

Earlier studies suggest that viruses can have positive, neutral or negative effects on their vectors (Costa et al. 1993; Colvin et al. 2006; Jiu et al. 2007). Virus-infected plants undergo changes that affect the biology of insect vectors. Insect vectors feeding on infected plants have been reported to differ in growth rates, longevity, and fecundity compared with those vectors feeding on uninfected plants (Kennedy 1951; Baker 1960). Some vectors preferentially colonize infected plants (Castle et al. 1993). Barley yellow dwarf virus RPV-NY (BYDV-RPV-NY) infection increased the rate of population growth of Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), relative to that on healthy oats. The proportion of Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus) developing to alatae on BYDV-infected oats was significantly greater than on healthy oats (Montllor & Gildow 1986). Virus infection can increase plant suitability for insect vector survival and reproduction by improving the nutritional quality of the plant (Kennedy 1951; Baker 1960). However, increased survival may lead to virus proliferation in the field (McElhany et al. 1995).

In the past decade, Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) has become a major threat to the cotton industry in Pakistan (Briddon & Markham 2000) and more recently has spread to India (Briddon et al. 2006). Characteristic symptoms of the disease include upward and downward leaf curling, vein thickening, and occasionally enation formation on the underside of leaves (Khalid et al. 1999). Cotton leaf curl disease has a complex etiology but is believed to be caused by Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) (Mansoor et al. 2003; Varma & Malathi 2003). Cotton leaf curl virus is transmitted by B. tabaci in a circulative, persistent manner, and can be retained from a few d to the entire life period of the whitefly (Liu et al. 1998; Mansoor et al. 2003; Mann & Singh 2004a). Khan and Ahmad (2005) detected CLCuV DNA in host plants within 17 d of inoculation and in B. tabaci within 4 h of feeding on infected host plants. The acquisition and transmission of CLCuV by B. tabaci as well as effects of the virus on host plants have been studied in detail (Nateshan et al. 1996; Khan & Ahmad 2005; Mann & Singh 2004b, 2004c). However, the interactions between this geminivirus and B. tabaci are still poorly understood. In the present studies, we compared the performance of B. tabaci on CLCuV infected and healthy cotton plants to determine the effect of CLCuV on its vector.

Materials and Methods

Maintenance of Whiteflies, Virus Source, and Experimental Plants

Whiteflies

Viruliferous and non-viruliferous whiteflies were maintained on American cotton, Gossypium hirsutum. Whiteflies were obtained by collecting adults from untreated Desi cotton, Gossypium arboreum, which is resistant to CLCuV (Nateshan et al. 1996; Briddon et al. 2001; Rahman et al. 2002). The adults were released on cotton plants in insect rearing cages for oviposition. The adults were removed and killed manually after 3 d to retain eggs only. Newly emerged whitefly adults from these eggs were released and maintained on new cotton plants for breeding. Whitefly adults also were obtained from leaves bearing puparia of G. arboreum collected from the field. These adults were released on healthy plants for verification of virus infection. Adults from plants with no symptoms in 40 d were considered non-viruliferous. These adults were reared on G. hirsutum plants in separate insect rearing cages for further studies.

Virus Source

Cotton plants, G. hirsutum CV F846 (CLCuV susceptible) exhibiting typical symptoms of CLCuD described by Kapur et al. (1994) and Kang et al. (2003a) were obtained from the field and transplanted in earthen pots containing a mixture of loamy soil and farm yard manure in a 1:1 ratio. New plants were raised and infected with CLCuV through whitefly mediated transmission. Whiteflies were given an acquisition access period of 24 h on virus source and were confined on new healthy plants for 8 h (inoculation access period). The new plants were raised and maintained in 1.2 × 1.2 × 1.2-m cages and used as virus source after the appearance of typical CLCuD symptoms.

Experimental Plants

The experimental cotton plants, G. hirsutum CV F846, were planted in earthen pots (30 × 23 cm) with 3 to 4 seeds per pot. The plants were raised and maintained in separate cages following the standard procedures for growing cotton crop. Plants were made CLCuV infected by inoculating healthy plants through whitefly mediated transmission. Inoculations were made on 20-d-old plants, and the experiments were conducted at 5, 20, and 35-d Post Inoculation (DPI) on these groups of plants with different virus infection status. These groups were defined as CLCuV infected with no symptoms, initiation of CLCuD symptoms, and with well defined CLCuD symptoms. The greenhouse experiments comprised 3 replications with 15 test plants in each replication with 2 clip cages on each plant.

Performance of B. tabaci on Virus Infected and Healthy Cotton Under Greenhouse Conditions

Egg, Nymphal, Pupal Stage Duration and Adult Longevity

Performance of B. tabaci was compared on CLCuV infected and healthy cotton plants of same age from Aug to Oct 2005. Four pairs of male and female adult whiteflies were confined on the underside of leaves with clip cages for egg laying. The adults were removed after their first oviposition. Number of eggs laid under each clip cage was observed with the help of a binocular microscope. Twenty eggs per clip cage were retained, and the remaining were removed carefully with a moist cotton swab. The clip cages were monitored twice daily to observe offspring development with regard to duration of egg, nymphal, and pupal stages. Nymphal duration was defined as completion of the 3rd instar, when the nymph is elliptical in shape and the eyes are not completely divided (Sharaf & Batta 1985; Brar et al. 2005). The 4th instar was defined as the pupa, as many authors consider 4th instar and pupal stages to be morphologically distinct but difficult to delineate (Hussain 1931; Gill 1990; Byrne & Bellows 1991b; Salas & Mendoza 1995).

Adult Longevity

Ten newly emerged male and female non-viruliferous whiteflies were separately confined on the underside of cotton leaves. Insects were transferred to new leaves every week to avoid emergence of new adults on the same leaves. Insect mortality was recorded daily until all the insects died.

Fecundity

Two pairs of newly emerged male and female whiteflies were confined on the underside of leaves of test plants with clip cages for oviposition. Female whiteflies were serially transferred daily to new test plants after their first oviposition until all insects died. Number of eggs laid and hatched on each plant was recorded.

Field Studies

Colonization of B. tabaci on CLCuV Infected and Healthy Cotton Plants

Colonization of B. tabaci on CLCuV infected and healthy cotton plants were studied under natural field conditions. Cotton plants, G. hirsutum CV F846, were raised on a sandy loam soil following the protocol of Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India. Each plot consisted of six 6 m long rows with 8 plants in each row. The plants were allowed to grow under natural conditions until maturity. Total number of whitefly adults per leaf on CLCuV infected and healthy plants were recorded. Whitefly populations were sampled on 3 leaves of 15 plants upon initiation, and 15 d after appearance of CLCuD symptoms. Plants not showing CLCuD symptoms after 20 d were considered healthy. Double the number of plants were sampled in the case of healthy plants. Experimental design was a Randomized Complete Block with 4 replications of each treatment.

Data Analysis

A two-factor ANOVA was conducted with CLCuV infection and post inoculation period as factors. When the factors or their interactions were significant at ά = 0.05, the means were separated with LSD by SAS, Version 9.1 (SAS Institute 2003).

Results

Egg, Nymphal, Pupal Stage Duration and Adult Longevity

Egg

There were no significant differences in the duration of egg stage at 5, 20 and 35 DPI between CLCuV infected and healthy cotton plants (Table 1). Egg duration increased as post inoculation period increased from 5 to 35 d (25- and 55-d-old). Egg duration did not change with severity of symptoms at 20 and 35 DPI (40- and 55-d-old). Egg duration increased with plant age in 20- and 55-d-old healthy plants. The overall mean duration of egg stage varied from 3 to 6 d to 4 to 7 d on CLCuV infected and healthy plants, respectively.

Nymph

The overall nymphal duration was significantly reduced on CLCuV infected plants when compared with healthy plants at all stages of infection (Table 2). The nymphal duration did not change significantly with the severity of symptoms on CLCuV infected plants. The nymphal duration did not change with age of healthy plants. The overall nymphal duration ranged from 11 to 21 d on CLCuV infected plants compared to 11 to 18 d on healthy plants.

Pupa

The pupal duration was significantly lower on 20 and 35 DPI plants (Table 3). There were no significant differences at 5 DPI. The pupal duration did not change significantly with symptom severity on virus infected plants. The pupal duration did not change with age of healthy plants. Overall the pupal duration varied from 3 to 7 d on CLCuV infected plants and 5 to 8 d on healthy plants.

Adult Longevity

Life expectancy of male and female adults of B. tabaci developing on CLCuV infected plants was significantly reduced compared to adults developing on healthy plants. Both male and female whiteflies survived longer on 35 DPI plants (55-d-old) compared to 5 and 20 DPI plants. Both male and female whiteflies survived longer on 55-d-old plants than 25- and 40-d-old healthy plants (Table 4). Females survived longer than males on healthy as well as virus infected plants. Overall, male and female longevity ranged from 6 to 10 and 8 to12 d, respectively, on CLCuV infected plants compared to 7 to 12 and 8 to 14 d, respectively, on healthy plants.

Fecundity

Cotton leaf curl virus infection had a significant effect on fecundity of B. tabaci. Total number of eggs laid on 35 DPI plants was significantly lower than on healthy plants of the same age (Table 5). There was no significant effect of symptom severity on whitefly fecundity on CLCuV infected plants. There was no effect of plant age on whitefly fecundity on healthy plants. Egg viability was significantly higher on 20 and 35 DPI virus infected plants compared to healthy plants of same age. Egg viability was not influenced by the symptom severity on CLCuV infected plants or the age of healthy plants.

Colonization of B. tabaci on CLCuV Infected and Healthy Cotton Plants

The mean number of adults colonizing per leaf on CLCuV infected and healthy plants was not significantly different under field conditions at initiation or complete development of symptoms (data not shown).

Discussion

The effects of CLCuV on its vector appear to be mixed and complex with both positive and negative affects on life history parameters. Mean nymphal duration was significantly reduced on virus-infected plants of all ages. However, reduction in pupal duration and adult longevity was observed on 20 and 35 DPI plants only. Assuming that shorter developmental period indicate good host suitability (Muniz 2000), CLCuV showed positive effects on the development of immature stages.

Improved whitefly performance on CLCuV infected plants appears to be the result of altered nutritional status of host plants, and the suppression of plant defense against the vector (Belliure et al. 2005; Stout et al. 2006). Virus infection in cotton plants has been shown to increase peroxidase activity, catechol, phenols, carotenoids, proteins, total sugars, chlorophyll, oil content, lipase enzyme contents (Kaur et al. 1998; Ashraf et al. 2004; Kang et al. 2003b) and reduced Ca++ and K+ content (Nadeem et al. 2006). Increased total sugar and reduced K+ content of cotton leaves has been shown to attract higher number of whiteflies (Dominick & Sundaram 1992; Abdullah & Singh 2004), while chlorophyll, phenols, carotenoid and peroxidase are associated with decreased whitefly populations (Ilyas 1991; Butter et al. 1992; Ravi et al. 2006).

Virus infection had no effect on egg duration but reduced that of the nymph in 5 DPI plants. As symptom severity increased egg, nymphal, and pupal duration, as well as adult longevity, remained unaffected. This further strengthens the supposition that changes in insect development are not due to altered plant morphology, but to the improved nutritional suitability of cotton plants. The effect of virus in the absence of symptoms on pupal duration could not be determined as symptoms appeared before pupation occurred on 5 DPI plants.

The differences observed in egg duration, longevity, fecundity, and viability within virus infected plants appears to be related to plant age, as similar differences were observed in healthy plants of the same age. In general, the duration of egg, nymph, pupa, and adult longevity tended to increase with plant age. This general trend may be due to decreases in temperature from Sep to Oct in Punjab state. Abdullah & Singh (2004) demonstrated longer whitefly adult longevity with decreased temperature under Punjab conditions.

Reduction in longevity, and fecundity may be due to the direct negative effect of progressive tissue invasion by the virus as suggested by Pesic-Van Esbroeck et al. (1995) in Squash leaf curl virus (SqLCV) infected whiteflies, and Rubinstein & Czosnek (1997) in TYLCV infected whiteflies. Pesic-Van Esbroeck et al. (1995) reported that invasion SqLCV into whitefly tissues and organs resulted in gross and ultra structural abnormalities of the reproductive, digestive and excretory systems. Rubinstein and Czosnek (1997) demonstrated 40 to 50 percent reduction in mean number of eggs laid by viruliferous whiteflies infected with TYLCV compared to healthy whiteflies. However, Stansly & McKenzie (2007) in preliminary studies attributed the reduced fecundity of B. tabaci on TYLCV infected plants to reduced host suitability.

Differences were not significant in mean number of adults colonizing CLCuV infected and healthy plants under field conditions. Thompson (2002) reported similar results for total number of B. tabaci nymphs and pupal cases on East African Cassava mosaic virus (EACMV) infected plants. However, Colvin et al. (1999) positively correlated the symptom severity of EACMV and UgV to whitefly density.

In general, our results extend previous findings of mixed effects of viruses on their insect vectors. The patterns of virus effects on their insect vector appear to be unique depending upon the type of plant-virus-vector relationship. The virus appears to have direct negative effects on its vector, but benefits the vector indirectly by improving nutritional suitability of plant.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jimmy Pitzer and Kirandeep Mann for editing this manuscript.

References Cited

1.

N. M. M. Abdullah and J. Singh . 2004. Biology of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) on cotton under Punjab conditions. Pest Mgt. Econ. Zool. 12:1–6. Google Scholar

2.

M. Y. Ashraf, S. Mahmood, G. Sarwar, M. Ashraf, M Naeem, and S. Zafar . 2004. Physiological and biochemical changes in resistant and susceptible to Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) cotton varieties at germination and early seedling stages: changes in lipase, oil content, protein and soluble sugars. Int. J. of Biol. Biotechnol 1:217–222. Google Scholar

3.

P. F. Baker 1960. Aphid behavior on healthy and on yellows virus infected sugar beet. Ann. Appl. Biol 48:384–391. Google Scholar

4.

B. Belliure, AJanssen, P. C. Maris, D. Peters, and M. W. Sabelis . 2005. Herbivore arthropods benefit from vectoring plant viruses. Ecol. Lett 8:70–79. Google Scholar

5.

M. W. Blair, M. J. Basset, A. M. Abouzid, E. Hieber, J. E. Polston, R. T. McMillan, J. R. W. Graves, and M. Lamberts . 1995. Occurrences of bean golden mosaic virus in Florida. Pl. Dis 79:539–533. Google Scholar

6.

D. S. Brar, A. K. Aneja, J. Singh, and M. S. Mahal . 2005. Biology of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) on American cotton, Gossypium hirsutum Linnaeus. J. Insect Sci 18:48–59. Google Scholar

7.

R. W. Briddon, S. Mansoor, I. D. Bedford, S. S. Pinner, K. Saunders, J. Stanley, Y. Zafar, K. A. Malik, and P. G. Markham . 2001. Identification for DNA components required for induction of Cotton leaf curl disease. Virology 285:234–243. Google Scholar

8.

R. W. Briddon, S. E. Bull, and I. D. Bedford . 2006. Occurrence of Sweet potato leaf curl virus in Sicily. Plant Path 55:286. Google Scholar

9.

R. W. Briddon and P. G. Markham . 2000. Cotton leaf curl virus disease. Virus Res 71:151–159. Google Scholar

10.

N. S. Butter, B. K. Vir, G. Kaur, T. H. Singh, and R. K. Raheja . 1992. Biochemical basis of resistance to whitefly Bemisia tabaci Genn. (Aleyrodidae: Hemiptera) in cotton. Trop. Agr 69:119–122. Google Scholar

11.

D. N. Byrne and T. S. Bellows . 1991a. Whiteflies biology. Annu. Rev. Entomol 36:431–457. Google Scholar

12.

D. Byrne and T. S. Bellows . 1991b. Life history traits of the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on six virus infected or healthy plant species. Environ. Entomol 20:1102–1107. Google Scholar

13.

S. J. Castle and P. H. Berger . 1993. Rates of growth and increase of Myzus persicae on virus-infected potatoes according to type of virus-vector relationship. Entomol. Exp. Appl 69:51–60. Google Scholar

14.

S. Cohen, J. E. Duffus, and M. J. Berlinger . 1987. Epidemiological Studies on Whitefly Transmitted Viruses in California and Israel. BARD Report Project No. 1: 583. Google Scholar

15.

J. Colvin, C. A. Omongo, M. R. Govindappa, P. C. Stevenson, and M. N. Maruthi . 2006. Host plant viral infection effects on arthropod-vector population growth, development and behavior: management and epidemiological implications. Adv. Virol. Res 67:419–452. Google Scholar

16.

H. S. Costa, J. K. Brown, S. Sivasupramaniam, and J. Bird . 1993. Regional distribution, insecticide resistance, and reciprocal crosses between the A and B biotypes of Bemisia tabaci. Insect Sci. Appl 14:255–266. Google Scholar

17.

J. S. Dominick and M. M. Sundaram . 1992. Effect of insecticides on the biological nature of the host plant and its relation to resurgence of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci on cotton. Pestology 16:7–10. Google Scholar

18.

R. J. Gill 1990. The morphology of whiteflies. pp. 13-46 In D. Gerling [ed.], Whitelies: their bionomics, pest status and management. Intercept, Andover, UK. Google Scholar

19.

M. A. Hussain 1931. A Preliminary note on the whitefly of cottons in the Punjab. Agric. J. India 25:508–526. Google Scholar

20.

M. Ilyas, S. N. Puri, and N. B. Rote . 1991. Effects of some morphophysiological characters of leaf on incidence of cotton whitefly. J. Maha. Agric. Univ 16:386–388. Google Scholar

21.

M. Jiu, X. P. Zhou, L. Tong, X. Yang, F. H. Wan, and S. S. Liu . 2007. Vector-virus mutualism accelerates population increase of an invasive whitefly. PloS ONE 2:1–8. Google Scholar

22.

S. S. Kang, M. Athar, S. S. Cheema, V. G. Malathi, and G. Radhakrishnan . 2003a. Quick detection of Cotton leaf curl virus. Indian Pytopath 57:245–246. Google Scholar

23.

S. S. Kang, M. Athar, and S. S. Cheema . 2003b. Physiological changes in cotton infected with Cotton leaf curl virus. Pl. Dis. Res 9:193–195. Google Scholar

24.

S. P. Kapur, J. Singh, B. L. Chopra, A. S. Sohi, H. S. Rewal, and D. D. Narang . 1994. Cotton leaf curl in Punjab. Pl. Dis. Res 9:86. Google Scholar

25.

G. Kaur, B. S. Sohal, J. Singh, and K. L. Bajaj . 1998. Influence of cotton leaf curl virus on the polyphenol metabolism of resistant and susceptible cotton leaves. Pl. Dis. Res. 13:23–27. Google Scholar

26.

J. S. Kennedy 1951. Benefits to aphids from feeding on galled and virus-infected leaves. Nature 168:825–826. Google Scholar

27.

S. Khalid, H. Shah, and M. A. Massod . 1999. Relationship of Cotton leaf curl virus Symptoms with Virus Concentration and Epitope Profile. Pak. J. Biol. Sci 2:1387–1389. Google Scholar

28.

J. A. Khan and J. Ahmad . 2005. Diagnosis, monitoring and transmission characteristics of Cotton leaf curl virus. Curr. Sci 88:1803–1809. Google Scholar

29.

D. H. Liu, D. J. Robinson, and B. D. Harrison . 1998. Nuclear location of the 16K non-structural protein of tobacco rattle virus. J. Gen. Virol 72:1811–1817. Google Scholar

30.

P. McElhany, L. A. Real, and A. G. Power . 1995. Vector preference and disease dynamics: A study of barley yellow dwarf virus. Ecology 76:444–457. Google Scholar

31.

R. S. Mann and L. Singh . 2004a. Retention of Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) in its vector whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Ind. J. Entomol 66:96–98. Google Scholar

32.

R. S. Mann and L. Singh . 2004b. Studies on interaction of Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) with its vector, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). J. Cotton Res. Dev 18:96–98. Google Scholar

33.

R. S. Mann and L. Singh . 2004c. Studies on the relationship of Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) with its vector, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Ind. J. Plant. Prot 32:140–141. Google Scholar

34.

S. W. Mansoor, R. W. Briddon, S. E. Bull, I. D. Bedford, A. Bashir, M. Hussain, M. Saeed, Y. Zafar, K. A. Malik, A. C. Fauquet, and P. G. Markham . 2000. Cotton leaf curl disease is associated with multiple monopartite begomoviruses supported by single DNA beta. Arch. Virol 148:1969–1986. Google Scholar

35.

C. B. Montllor and F. E. Gildow . 1986. Feeding responses of two grain aphids to barley and Yellow dwarf virus-infected oats. Entomol. Exp. Appl 42:63–69. Google Scholar

36.

M. Muniz 2000. Host suitability of two biotypes of Bemisia tabaci on some common weeds. Entomol. Exp. Appl 95:63–70. Google Scholar

37.

I. Nadeem, M. Y. Ashraf, J. Farrukh, M. Ashraf, and H. Sohail . 2006. Cotton leaf curl virus: ionic status of leaves and symptoms development. J. Integrative Plant Biology 48:558–562. Google Scholar

38.

L. R. Nault 1997. Arthropod transmission of plant viruses: A new synthesis. Ann Entomol. Soc. Am 90:521–541. Google Scholar

39.

H. M. Nateshan, V. Muniyappa, M. M. Swanson, and B. D. Harrison . 1996. Host range, vector relations and serological relationships of Cotton leaf curl virus from southern India. Ann. Appl. Biol 128:233–244. Google Scholar

40.

Z. Pesic-Van Esbrock, K. F. Harris, and J. E. Duffus . 1995. Immunocyto- chemical localization of Squash leaf curl virus (SqLCV) in squash and the sweet potato whitefly. Phytopath 85:1180. Google Scholar

41.

M. Ravi, N. Dhandapani, N. Sathiah, and M. Murugan . 2006. Influence of organic manures and fertilizers on the incidence of sucking pests of sunflower, Helianthus annus L. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci 14:41–44. Google Scholar

42.

M. Rahman, D. Hussain, and Y. Zafar . 2002. Estimation of genetic diversity among elite cotton cultivars, genotypes by DNA fingerprinting technology. Crop Sci 42:2137–2144. Google Scholar

43.

G. Rubinstein and H. Czosnek . 1997. Long term association of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus with its whitefly vector Bemisia tabaci: effect on the insect transmission capacity, longevity and fecundity. J. Gen. Virol 78:2683–2689. Google Scholar

44.

J. Salas and O. Mendoza . 1995. Biology of the sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on tomato. Florida Entomol 78:154–160. Google Scholar

45.

Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) Institute 2003. Statistical Analysis software program version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar

46.

N. Sharaf and Y. Batta . 1985. Effect of some factors on the relationship between the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Genn. (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and the parasitoid Eretmocerus mundus Mercet (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie 99:267–276. Google Scholar

47.

P. A. Stansly and L. McKenzie . 2007. Fourth International Bemisia Workshop and International Whitefly Genomics Workshop. J. Insect Sci 8:39. Google Scholar

48.

M. J. Stout, J. S. Thaler, and B. P. H. J. Thomma . 2006. Plant-mediated interactions between pathogenic microorganisms and herbivorous arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol 51:663–689. Google Scholar

49.

W. M. O. Thompson 2002. Comparison of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) development on uninfected cassava plants and cassava plants infected with East African Cassava Mosaic Virus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 95:387–394. Google Scholar

50.

A. Varma and V. G. Malathi . 2003. Emerging geminivirus problems: a serious threat to crop production. Ann. Appl. Biol 142:145–164. Google Scholar

Appendices

Table 1.

Egg duration of B. tabaci on clcuv infected versus healthy cotton plants (G. hirsutum cv f846).

i0015-4040-91-2-249-t01.gif

Table 2.

Nymphal duration of B. tabaci on clcuv infected versus healthy cotton plants (G. hirsutum cv f846).

i0015-4040-91-2-249-t02.gif

Table 3.

PUPAL duration of B. tabaci on clcuv infected versus healthy cotton plants (G. hirsutum cv f846).

i0015-4040-91-2-249-t03.gif

Table 4.

Longevity of B. tabaci adults on clcuv infected versus healthy cotton plants (G. hirsutum cv f846).

i0015-4040-91-2-249-t04.gif

Table 5.

Fecundity and egg viability of B. tabaci on clcuv infected versus healthy pants of cotton (G. hirsutum cv f846).

i0015-4040-91-2-249-t05.gif
R. S. Mann, J. S. Sidhu, N. S. Butter, A. S. Sohi, and P. S. Sekhon "Performance of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on Healthy and Cotton Leaf Curl Virus Infected Cotton," Florida Entomologist 91(2), 249-255, (1 June 2008). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2008)91[249:POBTHA]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top