Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2008 Identification of Mature Larvae of Hydaticus cinctipennis and H. Bimarginatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) Based on Morphology and Breeding Seasons
E. H. Barman, B. P. White, R. Jackson, G. W. Wolfe
Author Affiliations +

The cosmopolitan genus Hydaticus is represented in the southeastern United States by only 2 species, H. (Hydaticus) cinctipennis Aubé and H. (Guignotites) bimarginatus (Say). Southeastern records for H. (H.) cinctipennis are from Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, and Tennessee. The U.S.A. range of H. (G.) bimarginatus includes the states of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains with additional records from Arkansas (Roughley & Pengelly 1981). Young (1954) tentatively included H. rimosus in the Florida fauna based on 3 specimens taken in Broward County; however, Roughley & Pengelly (1981) concluded that the range of this species does not extend into Florida and that its distribution is the Caribbean Islands, the Bahamas, and Mexico.

Larvae of Hydaticus are superficially similar to those of Dytiscus. The taxa are distinguished by the (1) smaller size of specimens of Hydaticus and (2) presence of 2 or 3 lobes on the distal margin of the prementum (labium) of Hydaticus (Fig. 1). These lobes are not present on the smooth and convex premental margin of Dytiscus (e.g., Merritt & Cummins 1996; Epler 1996). Dettner (1984) described the prementum of second and third instars of Guignotites as trilobite and that of Hydaticus s. str. as bilobed. Although the prementum of an immature larva of a South American species of Guignotites is bilobed (Michat and Torres 2006), Jackson et al. (2008) confirmed the presence of 3 lobes on the prementum of the mature larva H. (G.) bimarginatus. Because distribution records (Roughley & Pengelly 1981; Turnbow & Smith 1983) indicate that there are only 2 species of Hydaticus, H. (H.) cinctipennis and H. (G.) bimarginatus, in Georgia and the presence of 2 premental lobes, second and third instars collected from a lower Piedmont marsh habitat in Talboton County, Georgia, U.S.A., were identified as H. (H.) cinctipennis.

Jackson et al. (2007) noted that the median lobe of H. (G.) bimarginatus was often small and difficult to observe on some specimens, requiring removal of the prementum and a careful examination of its dorsal surface in order to confirm the presence (or absence) of a third lobe. Consequently, if the number of lobes is used as an exclusive diagnostic character, larvae of H. (G.) bimarginatus may be misidentified as H. (H.) cinctipennis. A comparison of labial anatomy of both species indicated that a more obvious, convenient, and reliable character is available for identification of at least mature larvae of the 2 species in the southeast. The proximal labial palpomere of H. cinctipennis had a mean length of 0.29 mm (n = 4) that is less than the distance between outside width ( = 0.43 mm, n = 4) of the prementum at the origins of the palpomeres (Fig. 1A; line a). In contrast, the proximal palpomeres of H. bimarginatus are longer ( = 0.51 mm; Jackson et al. 2007) than the width ( = 0.41 mm, n = 9) of the prementum at the same location (Fig. 1B). An examination of second instars of H. bimarginatus (n = 4) and H. cinctipennis (n = 2 exuviae) indicated that this character may be used to identify these larvae as well. Thus, if an examination of dytiscinine third or second instars reveals the presence of lobes on or near the anterior margin of the labial prementum, an analysis of the length of the proximal palpomere relative to the width of the prementum at the origin of the palpomeres will permit identification of mature Hydaticus larvae as either H. cinctipennis (shorter palpomere) or H. bimarginatus (longer palpomere). First instars of H. cinctipennis were not available for examination.

Differences in the breeding seasons also may aide in the identification of H. bimarginatus and H. cinctipennis. Second and third instars of H. cinctipennis were collected 19 and 23 III 1997 from a lower Piedmont marsh in Talboton County, Georgia (USA), indicating that adult dispersal to and oviposition in this habitat occurred before early Mar. Average temperatures for this County in Feb and Mar 1997 were 9.5 and 13.6°C, respectively (Anonymous 2007). Jackson et al. (2007) concluded that oviposition for the population of H. bimarginatus occurred as early as Jun in 2004 when the average monthly temperature was 26.1°C (Anonymous 2007). These data are consistent with and supportive of a zoogeographic hypothesis by Roughley & Pengelly (1981) that H. cinctipennis entered northern North America from western Eurasia and that H. bimarginatus represents a northern extension of a Neotropical fauna. Given this zoogeographic history, it would be expected that H. bimarginatus would be less tolerant of even the relatively mild winter and spring temperatures of the Georgia lower Piedmont than H. cinctipennis and would breed later in the year.


Relative lengths of the basal segments of the labial palmomeres may be used to identify the third and second instars of the 2 southeastern species of Hydaticus. These segments are longer on H. bimarginatus than on H. cinctipennis. In Georgia, H. cinctipennis breeds in late Apr and early Mar with oviposition for H. bimarginatus beginning in late Jun and continuing into the Fall.

References Cited


Anonymous 2007. NOWData--NOAA Online Weather Data. www at Scholar


K. Dettner 1984. Description of the larvae of Hydaticus leander Rossi (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) with a key to European species of the genus Hydaticus. Entomol. Basiliensia 9:108–115. Google Scholar


J. H. Epler 1996. Identification Manual for the Water Beetles of Florida (Coleoptera: Dryopidae, Dytiscidae, Elmidae, Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Hydraenidae, Hydrophilidae, Noteridae, Psephenidae, Ptilodactylidae, Scirtidae). Florida Dept. Environ. Protection, Tallahassee. 257 pp. Google Scholar


R. Jackson, E. H. Barman, B. P. White, and G. W. Wolfe . 2007. A description of the third instar of Hydaticus bimarginatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Georgia J. Sci 65:182–193. Google Scholar


M. C. Michat and P. L M. Torres . 2006. Hydaticus tuyuensis Trémouilles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): larval morphology and phylogenetic relationships within Dytiscinae. Hydrobiologia 563:479–492. Google Scholar


R. E. Roughley and D. H. Pengelly . 1981. Classification, phylogeny, and zoogeography of Hydaticus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of North America. Quaest. Ent 17:249–309. Google Scholar


R. H. Turnbow and C. L. Smith . 1983. An annotated checklist of the Hydradephaga (Coleoptera) of Georgia. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc 18:429–443. Google Scholar


D. S. White and W. U. Brigham . 1996. Aquatic Coleoptera. pp. 399-473 In R. W. Merritt and K. W. Cummins [eds.], An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 3rd ed. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa. 862 pp. Google Scholar


F. N. Young 1954. The Water Beetles of Florida. University of Florida Press, Gainesville. 238 pp. Google Scholar


Fig. 1.

Labia of third instar of Hydaticus cinctipennis (A) and H. bimarginatus (B). Premental width, a and proximal palpomere, pp.

E. H. Barman, B. P. White, R. Jackson, and G. W. Wolfe "Identification of Mature Larvae of Hydaticus cinctipennis and H. Bimarginatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) Based on Morphology and Breeding Seasons," Florida Entomologist 91(2), 315-316, (1 June 2008).[315:IOMLOH]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2008
Back to Top