Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2008 Monitoring for Exotic Spodoptera Species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Florida
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Trapping studies were conducted in 2 Florida locations to determine if 3 Old World Spodoptera Guenée species were present. Commercially-produced lures for S. exempta (Walker), S. littoralis (Boisduval), and S. litura (F.), plus a S. litura lure made by the USDA-APHIS-CPHST laboratory at Otis ANGB in Massachusetts, were used with plastic Unitraps and placed near 2 orchid nurseries in Lake and Miami-Dade counties. One S. litura male moth was identified from collections made in Apr 2007; no other exotic species were found in either location. However, thousands of resident species were collected, including S. albula (Walker) (= S. sunia Guenée), S. dolichos (F.), S. eridania (Stoll), S. exigua (Hübner), (J. E. Smith), and S. pulchella (Herrich-Schäffer). This study exposed the amount of labor and level of technical knowledge needed for scientists involved in finding exotic Spodoptera species.

The armyworm genus Spodoptera Guenée (Noctuidae: Amphipyrinae) contains 30 species that inhabit 6 continents (Pogue 2002). Species in temperate North America include several agricultural pests such as S. eridania (Stoll) (southern armyworm, Liburd et al. 2000), S. exigua (Hübner) (beet armyworm, Chen et al. 2008), S. frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (fall armyworm, Nagoshi & Meagher 2004), S. latifascia (Walker) (Vergara & Pitre 2001), S. ornithogalli (Guenée) (yellowstriped armyworm, Liburd et al. 2000), and S. praefica (Grote) (western yellowstriped armyworm, Summers 1989). These species feed on a wide range of grain, row, forage, vegetable, and ornamental crops. Four other species, S. albula (Walker) (= S. sunia Guenée), S. androgea (Stoll), S. dolichos (F.), and S. pulchella (Herrich-Schäffer) are present in the USA and in Neotropical regions of the Western Hemisphere (Pogue 2002). The beet armyworm is the only cosmopolitan species in the genus (Pogue 2002), and is probably Palaearctic in origin. The western yellow-striped armyworm is restricted to the western United States in distribution (Pogue 2002).

The Eastern Hemisphere contains 3 species that are serious agricultural pests. Spodoptera exempta (Walker), the nutgrass armyworm or African armyworm, is a migratory pest of cereal and pasture grasses (Cheke & Tucker 1995) that inhabits southern Europe, the Ethiopian Region, the Australasian Region, and various South Pacific islands including Hawaii (Pogue 2002). Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval), the Egyptian cotton leafworm, is a pest of cotton (Amin & Gergis 2006) and other agricultural crops. It ranges from southern Europe and Africa through the Middle East and western Asia and several islands in the Indian Ocean. Spodoptera litura (F.) (tobacco cutworm, cluster caterpillar, and rice cutworm, among other common names) attacks a wide range of crops including cotton, peanuts (groundnuts), rice, soybeans, vegetables, and ornamental plants (EPPO/CABI 1997). This species also has a wide geographical range, inhabiting western Asia eastward through eastern Asia and southward to the Australasian Region (Pogue 2002). It is also found throughout the Pacific including Hawaii.

Florida is second in the USA in the value of nursery and greenhouse crops, reaching $1.63 billion in 2004 (Jerardo 2005). Orchids are the second leading potted flowering plant produced in Florida. Much of the production in Florida involves importing small plants, growing them in shade houses for 6-12 mo. and then shipping them to markets in the USA and Canada. Many of the hundreds of thousands of small plants are imported from locations in Asia (Thailand, Taiwan, and China) where S. litura is known as a pest.

Pheromone-baited traps provide a technique to monitor relatively large areas for the presence of moth species. Pheromone components or blends have been identified for many of the species currently in the USA, including S. albula (Bestmann et al. 1988-published as S. sunia Guenée), S. dolichos (Lalanne-Cassou et al. 1994), S. eridania (Mitchell & Tumlinson 1994; Teal et al. 1985), S. exigua (Deng et al. 2004; Jung et al. 2003; Mitchell & Tumlinson 1994), S. frugiperda (Tumlinson et al. 1986; Batista-Pereira et al. 2006), S. latifascia (Monti et al. 1995) and S. praefica (Landolt et al. 2003). Pheromone blends have been synthesized and are commercially available for S. eridania, S. exigua, S. frugiperda, and S. praefica.

Pheromone components and blends have been identified and are commercially-available for 3 of the agriculturally-important exotic Spodoptera species, S. exempta (Cork et al. 1989), S. littoralis (Dunkelblum et al. 1987; Malo et al. 2000), and S. litura (Sun et al. 2003; Wei et al. 2004). Many of the components that make up the blends are similar across species (Table 1), but are released in different ratios. Our objective for this research was to monitor for exotic Spodoptera species with pheromone-baited traps placed near orchid nurseries. A secondary objective was to determine which native species would be attracted to these lures so that identification of moths could be made.

Materials and Methods

Groveland

The field site was located outside of Groveland, FL (Lake County) and was composed of shade houses (52,000 m2) surrounded by mixed natural vegetation and small home sites. The shade houses contained over 2 million plants, including Cymbidium, Dendrobium, and Phalenopsis orchids. The orchids are imported from Asia as young plants and grown for 6-12 months. They are then shipped to retail stores across the U.S. and Canada.

Pheromone-baited standard Universal Moth Traps, “Unitraps” (Great Lakes IPM, Vestaburg, MI) were used to capture attracted male moths. These traps are constructed of a white bucket, a yellow cone on top of the bucket, and a dark green cover above the cone. Scenturion® pheromone lures (Suterra LLC, Bend, OR) for each species (S. eridania, S. exempta, S. exigua, S. frugiperda, S. littoralis, S. litura, and S. praefica) were attached to corks (#11) with a pin, and the cork was placed in the middle of the green cover. An additional lure for S. litura was provided by the USDA-APHIS CPHST laboratory at Otis ANGB, Cape Cod, MA. A 2.5 × 2.5 cm piece of Vaportape (Hercon Environmental, Emigsville, PA) releasing the pesticide dichlorvos was stapled to a string and hung inside the bucket to kill captured moths. Two rows of traps were placed outside of the shade houses on 1.5-m metal poles at least 30 m apart, and species order was randomized at each sample date. Traps were placed 25 Jan 2006 and samples were collected either biweekly or monthly until 2 Oct 2006. Pheromone lures and vaportape were replaced when traps were serviced. It was soon noticed that large numbers of honey bees were collected in the traps due to a small apiary less than 1 km east of the site. Therefore, green buckets were used on one row of traps closest to the apiary.

Homestead

This site was located southwest of Homestead, FL (Miami-Dade County) in a mixed agricultural and urban environment, and contained 26,000 m2 of greenhouse space holding Dendrobium, and Phalenopsis orchids. One row of pheromone-baited traps for the same species as Groveland were placed on the south side of the complex on 24 Jan 2007 and removed 31 Oct 2007. Traps were serviced every 2 weeks and lures and vaportape were replaced monthly.

Moth Species Identification

Spodoptera species moths were identified with the keys and descriptions of Pogue (2002). The abdomen of all specimens was softened and cleared with hot 10% KOH. Genitalia were extracted with fine tweezers and various characters were examined under a dissecting microscope. The primary characters used for species identification were, not in order of importance, (1) number of coremata lobes and the shape of (2) clavus, (3) sacculus, (4) costal process, (5) basal sclerite of clasper, and (6) juxta.

Results

Groveland

Pheromone lures for the 3 native species caught relatively few moths. The S. exigua-baited traps only attracted one beet armyworm moth, the S. eridania-baited traps attracted 13 southern armyworm moths and 1 S. dolichos moth, and the S. frugiperda-baited traps attracted 6 fall armyworm moths. The S. praefica-baited traps did not attract any Spodoptera species but did attract 2 Plusiinae moths, soybean looper Chrysodeixis includens (Walker) (10) and sharp-stigma looper Ctenoplusia oxygramma (Geyer) (6).

The lures for the exotic species were much more active in attracting moths. The S. exempta-baited traps attracted large numbers of S. albula (183) and S. latifascia (863), and both species were present throughout the trapping duration (Fig. 1). The 2 S. litura-baited traps caught much fewer moths. The Suterra blend only attracted 1 beet armyworm; the Otis ANGB blend only attracted 3 S. dolichos. Surprisingly, the S. littoralis-baited traps did not attract any moths for the entire season.

Homestead

Many more moths were collected at the Homestead location. The beet armyworm and fall armyworm lures attracted almost exclusively the target species, with 257 and 682 moths captured, respectively (Fig. 2). The southern armyworm lure attracted the target species (165), but attracted more nontarget Spodoptera species including S. dolichos (237) and S. pulchella (12) (Fig. 3). As at Groveland, the S. praefica lures did not attract any Spodoptera species but did attract soybean loopers (194).

Collections of moths on Apr 20 revealed 1 S. litura moth in the Suterra blend of the S. litura pheromone. This was the only exotic moth collected for either location. Otherwise, these traps only attracted 9 S. dolichos and 2 S. pulchella. The Otis-ANGB blend attracted 149 S. dolichos and 5 S. pulchella (Fig. 4). The S. exempta baited-traps attracted thousands of native Spodoptera moths, including S. albula (1896), S. latifascia (1729) and S. pulchella (28). During May and Jun, over 15 S. albula moths per night were collected, whereas the final sampling date resulted in 30 S. latifascia moths per night (Fig. 5). As at Groveland, the S. littoralis-baited traps captured no Spodoptera species.

Discussion

The main objective of this work was to determine if any of the 3 exotic Spodoptera species were present. Although 1 S. litura male was found, subsequent intensive surveys with both pheromone lures have failed to collect moths (J. B., unpublished data). Tests are currently being conducted in India to determine the attractiveness of both blends in areas of natural S. litura populations. The 2 blends attracted different numbers of the native species S. dolichos. This apparently common species has (Z)9,(E)12-14:Ac and (Z)9-14:Ac as pheromone components (Lalanne-Cassou et al. 1994) and appears to be attracted to the 2 double-bonded acetate component that is in the Otis-ANGB blend.

It was somewhat surprising that the S. littoralis lures did not attract any Spodoptera moths, although the major component of the blend, (Z)9,(E)11-14:Ac (Dunkelblum et al. 1987; Malo et al. 2000), is not a major component for any of the native Spodoptera species. Previous tests in the Madeira Islands, Portugal, showed that these lures were effective in attracting S. littoralis moths (R. Pereira and J. B., unpublished data).

On the other hand, the large number of S. albula and S. latifascia moths attracted to the S. exempta lures agrees with the published reports of the pheromone blends for these species. The major component is (Z)9-14:Ac, with lesser amounts of (Z)9,(E)12-14:Ac and (Z)11-16:Ac (Bestmann et al. 1988; Cork et al. 1989; Monti et al. 1995). Commercial lures for S. albula and S. latifascia are not available, but it appears the lure for S. exempta could be used for these species.

Lures for the 3 Florida pest species, S. eridania, S. exigua, and S. frugiperda attracted the target moths. The S. eridania lures, however, attracted higher numbers of S. dolichos than the target species. Both species have (Z)9-14:Ac and (Z)9,(E)12-14:Ac as part of their pheromone blends (Lalanne-Cassou et al. 1994;Mitchell & Tumlinson 1994; Teal et al. 1985). The component (Z)9,(E)12-14:Ac is known to attract S. dolichos males (Mitchell & Tumlinson 1973). Cross attraction between S. eridania and S. exigua, which has been documented in other studies (Mitchell & Doolittle 1976; Mitchell & Tumlinson 1994), was rarely found in our study.

Because several native species were attracted to the blends designed for the 3 exotic species, moth identification will be critical to determining whether S. exempta, S. littoralis, or S. litura is intercepted or becomes established in Florida. Unless moths are retrieved quickly, noctuids captured in bucket traps over a period of several nights can be worn and difficult to identify based on forewing characters. Therefore, time-consuming identification with characters of the genitalia will need to be made. It is hoped that more entomologists can learn these characters and techniques to help identify this important group of pests.

Acknowledgments

We thank W. Montgomery (USDA-ARS-SHRS, Miami, FL) for moth collections and trap maintenance at the Homestead site. We thank M. G. Pogue (USDA-ARS-SEL, Washington, D.C.) for verification of the S. litura specimen. We thank John Adamczyk (Weslaco, TX) and Rod Nagoshi (Gainesville, FL) for critical review of an early manuscript. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the United States Department of Agriculture or the Agricultural Research Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

References Cited

1.

A. A. Amin and M. F. Gergis . 2006. Integrated management strategies for control of cotton key pests in middle Egypt. Agron. Res 4:121–128. Google Scholar

2.

L. G. Batista-Pereira, K. Stein, A. F. De Paula, J. A. Moreira, I. Cruz, M. D L. C. Figueiredo, J. Perri Jr., and A. G. Corréa . 2006. Isolation, identification, synthesis, and field evaluation of the sex pheromone of the Brazilian population of Spodoptera frugiperda. J. Chem. Ecol 32:1085–1099. Google Scholar

3.

H. J. Bestmann, A. B. Attygalle, J. Schwarz, O. Vostrowsky, and W. Knauf . 1988. Identification of sex pheromone components of Spodoptera sunia Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Chem. Ecol 14:683–690. Google Scholar

4.

R. A. Cheke and M. R. Tucker . 1995. An evaluation of potential economic returns from the strategic control approach to the management of African armyworm Spodoptera exempta (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) populations in eastern Africa. Crop Prot 14:91–103. Google Scholar

5.

Y. G. Chen, J. R. Ruberson, and D. M. Olson . 2008. Nitrogen fertilization rate affects feeding, larval performance, and oviposition preference of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, on cotton. Entomol. Exp. Appl 126:244–255. Google Scholar

6.

A. Cork, J. Murlis, and T. Megenasa . 1989. Identification and field testing of additional components of female sex pheromone of African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Chem. Ecol 15:1349–1364. Google Scholar

7.

J. Y. Deng, H. Y. Wei, Y. P. Huang, and J. W. Du . 2004. Enhancement of attraction to sex pheromones of Spodoptera exigua by volatile compounds produced by host plants. J. Chem. Ecol 30:2037–2045. Google Scholar

8.

E. Dunkelblum, M. Kehat, M. Harel, and D. Gordon . 1987. Sexual behaviour and pheromone titre of the Spodoptera littoralis female moth. Entomol. Exp. Appl 44:241–247. Google Scholar

9.

EPPO/CABI 1997. Quarantine Pests for Europe. 2nd edition. Edited by I. M. Smith, D. G. McNamara, P. R. Scott, and M. Holderness, CABI International, Wallingford, UK, 1425 pp. Google Scholar

10.

A. Jerardo 2005. Floriculture and nursery crops situation and outlook yearbook. USDA Econ. Res. Serv. FLO-2005. Google Scholar

11.

C. R. Jung, Y. J. Park, and K. S. Boo . 2003. Optimal sex pheromone composition for monitoring Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Korea. J. Asia-Pacific Entomol 6:175–182. Google Scholar

12.

B. Lalanne-Cassou, J. F. Sivain, L. Monti, and C. Malosse . 1994. Description d’une nouvelle espèce de Spodoptera de Guyane française: S. descoinsi (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Amphipyrinae), découverte grace à des attractifs sexuels. Am. Soc. Entomol. Fr 20:25–32. Google Scholar

13.

P. J. Landolt, C. Smithhisier, T. Adams, and R. SZack . 2003. An improved multi-component sex attractant for trapping male western yellowstriped armyworm, Spodoptera praefica (Grote) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Agric. Forest Entomol 5:333–339. Google Scholar

14.

O. E. Liburd, J. E. Funderburk, and S. M. Olson . 2000. Effect of biological and chemical insecticides on Spodoptera species (Lep., Noctuidae) and marketable yields of tomatoes. J. Agric. Entomol 124:19–25. Google Scholar

15.

E. A. Malo, M. Renou, and A. Guerrero . 2000. Analytical studies of Spodoptera littoralis sex pheromone components by electroantennography and gas chromatography-electroantennographic detection. Talanta 52:525–532. Google Scholar

16.

E. R. Mitchell and R. E. Doolittle . 1976. Sex pheromones of Spodoptera exigua, S. eridania, and S. frugiperda: bioassay for field activity. J. Econ. Entomol 69:324–326. Google Scholar

17.

E. R. Mitchell and J. H. Tumlinson . 1973. An attractant for males of Spodoptera dolichos (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 66:917–918. Google Scholar

18.

E. R. Mitchell and J. H. Tumlinson . 1994. Response of Spodoptera exigua and S. eridania (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) males to synthetic pheromone and S. exigua females. Florida Entomol 77:237–247. Google Scholar

19.

L. Monti, B. Lalanne-Cassou, P. Lucas, C. Malosse, and J-F. Silvan . 1995. Differences in sex pheromone communication systems of closely related species: Spodoptera latifascia (Walker) and S. descoinsi Lalanne-Cassou & Silvain (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Chem. Ecol 21:641–660. Google Scholar

20.

R. N. Nagoshi and R. L. Meagher . 2004. Behavior and distribution of the two fall armyworm host strains in Florida. Florida Entomol 87:440–449. Google Scholar

21.

M. G. Pogue 2002. A world revision of the genus Spodoptera Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Mem. American Entomol Soc. 43:1–202. Google Scholar

22.

C. G. Summers 1989. Effect of selected pests and multiple pest complexes on alfalfa productivity and stand persistence. J. Econ. Entomol 82:1782–1791. Google Scholar

23.

F. Sun, J. W. Du, and T. H. Chen . 2003. The behavioral responses of S. litura (F.) males to the female sex pheromone in wind tunnel and field trapping tests. Acta Entomol. Sinica 46:126. 130. Google Scholar

24.

P. E A. Teal, E. R. Mitchell, J. H. Tumlinson, R. R. Heath, and H. Sugie . 1985. Identification of volatile sex pheromone components released by the southern armyworm, Spodoptera eridania (Cramer). J. Chem. Ecol 11:717–725. Google Scholar

25.

J. H. Tumlinson, E. R. Mitchell, and H. S. Yu . 1990. Analysis and field evaluation of volatile blend emitted by calling virgin females of beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner). J. Chem. Ecol 16:3411–3423. Google Scholar

26.

J. H. Tumlinson, E. RMitchell, P. E A. Teal, R. R. Heath, and L. J. Mengelkoch . 1986. Sex pheromone of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) identification of components critical to attraction in the field. J. Chem. Ecol 12:1909–1926. Google Scholar

27.

O. R. Vergara and H. N. Pitre . 2001. Planting date, weed management, and insecticide application for control of lepidopterous pests in intercropped sorghum and maize in southern Honduras. Tropical Agric 78:182–189. Google Scholar

28.

H. Wei, Y. Huang, and J. Du . 2004. Sex pheromones and reproduction behavior of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) moths reared from larvae treated with four insecticides. J. Chem. Ecol 30:1457–1466. Google Scholar

Fig. 1.

Numbers of Spodoptera albula (Walker) and S. latifascia (Walker) adult males collected per night in Unitraps baited with a lure comprised of the sex pheromone blend of S. exempta (Walker), Groveland, FL, 2006.

i0015-4040-91-4-517-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

Numbers of Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) and S. frugiperda (J. E. Smith) adult males collected per night in Unitraps baited with lures comprised of the sex pheromone blends for each species, respectively, Homestead, FL, 2007.

i0015-4040-91-4-517-f02.gif

Fig. 3.

Numbers of Spodoptera eridania (Stoll), S. dolichos (F.), and S. pulchella (Herrich-Schäffer) adult males collected per night in Unitraps baited with a lure comprised of the sex pheromone blend of S. eridania, Homestead, FL, 2007.

i0015-4040-91-4-517-f03.gif

Fig. 4.

Numbers of Spodoptera dolichos (F.) and S. pulchella (Herrich-Schäffer) adult males collected per night in Unitraps baited with a lure comprised of the sex pheromone blend of S. litura (F.) (Otis ANGB septa), Homestead, FL, 2007.

i0015-4040-91-4-517-f04.gif

Fig. 5.

Numbers of Spodoptera albula (Walker), S. latifascia (Walker), and S. pulchella (Herrich-Schäffer) adult males collected per night in Unitraps baited with a lure comprised of the sex pheromone blend of S. exempta (Walker), Homestead, FL, 2007.

i0015-4040-91-4-517-f05.gif

Table 1.

Pheromone components for selected Spodoptera species.

i0015-4040-91-4-517-t01.gif
Robert L. Meagher, Julieta Brambila, and Edward Hung "Monitoring for Exotic Spodoptera Species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Florida," Florida Entomologist 91(4), 517-522, (1 December 2008). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040-91.4.517
Published: 1 December 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top