Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2008 Does Secondary Plant Metabolism Provide a Mechanism for Plant Defenses in the Tropical Soda Apple Solanum Viarum (Solanales: Solanaceae) against Spodoptera exigua and S. eridania (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)?
R. L. Hix, M. T. Kairo, S. Reitz
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Survival assays were conducted with beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) and southern armyworm S. eridania (Stoll) with tropical soda apple Solanum viarum Dunal, a relative of tomato. In addition, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzyme assays were conducted to determine if plant defense compounds are being produced by tropical soda apple in response to herbivory. Both S. exigua and S. eridania induced plant defenses in tropical soda apple. Significantly more S. exigua and S. eridania neonate larvae survived to 2nd instar on non-induced plants and artificial diet when compared with plants with induced defenses. Tropical soda apple plants fed on by S. exigua and S. eridania had significantly increased PPO activity.

The tropical soda apple (TSA) Solanum viarum Dunal is a nightshade classified by the State of Florida (FLEPPC 2007) and the USDA as a noxious weed. Tropical soda apple is native to Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay (Gandolfo et al. 2007) and was first reported in Florida in 1988 (Mullahey et al. 1993). It has invaded thousands of acres of pasture thereby reducing carrying capacity, and has invaded natural areas displacing native plant species (Mullahey & Colvin 1993; Medal & Cuda 1999). Tropical soda apple serves as a reservoir for several viruses including the tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) vectored by thrips including Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), the western flower thrips.

Insect herbivory can have effects on both the plant and the herbivore. For example, tomato plants respond to herbivory by producing proteinase inhibitors that reduce the palatability and nutritional quality of the plant. These plant defense compounds are directed by the octadecanoid pathway (Karban & Baldwin 1997; Thaler 1999a, Thaler 1999b). Herbivore feeding has been found to induce peroxidase, lipoxygenase, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and proteinase inhibitor (PI) activities (Stout et al. 1998) but not necessarily all at the same time by a given insect. This induced resistance (IR) system directed by the octadecanoid pathway is triggered by jasmonates such as jasmonic acid by the feeding of a broad range of insects (Broadway & Duffey 1986; Karban & Baldwin 1997). These induced defense proteins can reduce insect fitness, host preference, and nutritional value as well as increase mortality and work independently of constitutive defenses. Plants produce more than 1000 different volatiles by various plant species which may attract parasitoids and predators that attack the herbivore. These include the “green-leaf” 6-carbon aldehydes, alcohols and derivatives as well as alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, ethers, esters, and carboxylic acids just to name a few. Many of them are not species specific while others are very specific in which species they attract (D’Allessandro & Turlings 2005).

The beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) was chosen because it is a generalist herbivore known to induce secondary plant defenses in tomato, a closely related species in the genus Solanum (Felton et al. 1992; Alborn et al. 1997; Alborn et al. 2000). The southern armyworm Spodoptera eridania (Stoll) was chosen for this study due to its range overlap with TSA in Florida (R.L.H. unpublished data). The objectives of this study were to determine if feeding by the generalist herbivores S. exigua and S. eridania (Stoll) induced secondary plant defenses in TSA.

Materials and Methods

Spodoptera exigua colonies were established from eggs obtained from Bio-Serv (Frenchtown, NJ) and S. eridania colonies were established from wild caterpillars collected feeding on tomato. Colonies were maintained on S. exigua artificial diet (Bio-Serv, Frenchtown, NJ). Prior to assays, caterpillars were allowed to feed on tomato for 24 h.

Tropical soda apple plants were grown from seed collected from wild plants in Leon Co., Florida. Plants were planted in pots (12.7 cm × 12.5 cm) with Metro Growing Mix 220 (Sierra Grace Hort Products, Milpita, CA) (Mullahey & Cornell 1994) and fertilized with Peters® 20-20-20 (N) solution and maintained in an environmental chamber with photoperiod of 16:8 (L:D) or an outdoor shade tent.

Five 4th instars of S. exigua were allowed to feed on 5 TSA plants (i.e., 5 larvae per plant) for a period of 3 d. These plants were 45 d old. After this “induction” period, 100 neonate S. exigua larvae were placed on each of 5 induced plants, 5 control plants, and an external control consisting of S. exigua artificial diet (BioServ, Frenchtown, NJ). Those molting to the second instar were quantified. Plants were in individual cages to prevent caterpillars from moving from plant to plant.

This experiment was conducted in the same way substituting S. eridania in place of S. exigua. This experiment was repeated twice for S. exigua and S. eridania. Means and standard errors were calculated and subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD where appropriate (α = 0.05). Statistical analyses were done with JMP IN (SAS Institute 1996).

Polyphenol Oxidase Assay

Five 4th instars of S. exigua were placed on each of eight 45-d-old TSA plants, and five 4th instars of S. eridania larvae were placed on each of eight 45-d-old plants. The control consisted of eight 45-d-old plants that had never been exposed to herbivores. After 2 d of feeding, a leaf from each plant was excised at the petiole with a razor blade (n = 8). PPO activity was quantified by the methods of Felton et al. (1989). The rate of reaction was determined with a spectrophotometer (BioTek) to measure absorbance at 470 nm every 10 s over 3 min. This reaction rate was then divided by the mass of the leaf cutting to determine the rate for that cutting (n = 8). The arcsine-square root transformation was used on the mean rates and subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05).

Results

Significantly more neonate S. exigua larvae survived to 2nd instar on the non-induced tropical soda apple and artificial diet than on induced TSA (F = 12.8, df = 2, 14; P = 0.001). The mean number surviving on the artificial diet was 91.0 (± 7.3 SEM), on non-induced plants 74.6 (± 12.3 SEM), and on induced plants 27.3 (± 9.75 SEM) (Fig. 1A). This experiment was repeated with similar results (F = 12.6, df = 2, 14; P = 0.001) (Fig. 1B). The mean survival on the artificial diet was 95.4 (± 6.2 SEM), on non-induced plants 69.1 (± 11.9 SEM), and on induced plants 30.2 (± 8.8 SEM).

Significantly more neonate S. eridania larvae survived to the 2nd instar on the non-induced TSA and artificial diet than did on induced plants (F = 11.0, df = 2, 14; P = 0.002). The mean survival on the non-induced plants was 67.16 (± 8.1 SEM), on artificial diet 93.3 (± 5.9 SEM), and on induced plants 34.0 (± 10.3 SEM) (Fig.2A). This experiment was repeated with similar results (F = 7.4, df = 2, 14; P = 0.008) (Fig. 2B). The mean survival on the artificial diet was 89.0 (± 8.1 SEM), on non-induced plants 80.0 (±10.9 SEM) and on induced plants 29.0 (± 15.5 SEM).

Polyphenol Oxidase Assay

The PPO activity for both S. exigua and S. eridania induced plants was statistically different than the non-induced plants (P < 0.008 and P < 0.003, respectively), but means were not different from each other (P < 0.868). ANOVA was performed on transformed data (F = 8.9, df = 2, 23; P = 0.002). The data in Fig. 3 are the untransformed data.

Discussion

Before this study, nothing was known about secondary plant defenses in tropical soda apple. We hypothesized that feeding by generalist and/or specialist herbivores will induce secondary plant defenses in TSA. Survival assays were conducted with beet armyworm and southern armyworm because these generalist herbivores are known to induce secondary plant defenses in tomato, a relative of TSA. In addition, polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzyme assays were conducted to determine if secondary plant defense compounds are being produced in response to herbivory. This oxidative enzyme is produced by solanaceous plants including tobacco and tomato (Stout et al. 1996; Thaler et al. 1996; Stout et al. 1998; Thaler 1999a). PPO reacts with substrates in the herbivore gut making essential amino acids unavailable (Duffey & Felton 1989; Felton et al. 1992; Halitschke et al. 2001). Based on our results, TSA plants fed on by S. exigua and S. eridania had significantly increased PPO activity. Both S. exigua and S. eridania appears to induce secondary plant defenses in TSA.

The tortoise beetle Gratiana boliviana Spaeth (Coleoptera: Chrysomellidae) was released in Florida in 2003 as a classical biological control agent of TSA (Medal et al. 2003). G. boliviana and other biological control agents in quarantine are specialists that only feed on this species. These species-specific agents may provide negative effects on F. occidentalis feeding, egg laying performance or vector competency. Tropical soda apple is known to be a host of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV). Generalist herbivores like F. occidentalis may demonstrate lower feeding preference for plants with induced plant defenses (Karban & Baldwin 1997; Gouinguene et al. 2003). We are currently studying tropical soda apple induced responses in context of G. boliviana, S. exigua, and F. occidentalis.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by the USDA-ARS and Florida A & M University. We thank Mr. George Benn Marshal for technical assistance.

References Cited

1.

H. T. Alborn, T. C J. Turlings, T. H. Jones, G. S. Stenhagen, J. H. Loughrin, and J. H. Tumlinson . 1997. An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 276:945–949. Google Scholar

2.

H. T. Alborn, T. H. Jones, G. S. Stenhagen, and J. H. Tumlinson . 2000. Identification and synthesis of volicitin and related components from beet armyworm oral secretions. J. Chem. Ecol 26:203–220. Google Scholar

3.

R. M. Broadway and S. S. Duffey . 1986. Plant proteinase inhibitors: mechanism of action and effect on the growth and digestive physiology of larval Heliothis zea and Spodoptera exigua. J. Insect Physiol 32:827–833. Google Scholar

4.

M. D’alessandro and T. C J. Turlings . 2005. In situ modification of herbivore-induced plant odors: a novel approach to study the attractiveness of volatile organic compounds to parasitic wasps. Chem. Senses 30:739–753. Google Scholar

5.

S. S. Duffey and G. W. Felton . 1989. Plant enzymes in resistance to insects,. pp. 289-313 In J. R. Whitaker and P. E. Sonnet [eds], Biocatalysis in Agricultural Biotechnology. Am. Chem. Soc.  Google Scholar

6.

G. W. Felton, K. Donato, R. J. Del Vecchio, and S. S. Duffey . 1989. Activation of plant foliar oxidases by insect feeding reduces nutritive quality of foliage for noctuid herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:2667–2694. Google Scholar

7.

G. W. Felton, K. K. Donato, R. M. Broadway, and S. S. Duffey . 1992. Impact of oxidized plant phenolics on the nutritional quality of dietary protein to a noctuid herbivore, Spodoptera exigua. J. Insect Physiol 38:277–285. Google Scholar

8.

FLEPPC 2007. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s 2005 List of invasive species.  www.fleppc.orgGoogle Scholar

9.

D. Gandolfo, F. McKay, J. C. Medal, and J. P. Cuda . 2007. Open-field host specificity test of Gratiana boliviana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of tropical soda apple (Solanaceae) in the United States. Florida Entomol 90:223–228. Google Scholar

10.

S. Gouinguené, H. Alborn, and T. C J. Turlings . 2003. Induction of volatile emissions in maize by different larval instars of Spodoptera littoralis. J. Chem Ecol 29:145–162. Google Scholar

11.

R. Halitschke, U. Schittko, G. Pohnert, W. Boland, and I. T. Baldwin . 2001. Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. III. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore-specific plant responses. Plant Physiol 125:711–717. Google Scholar

12.

R. Karban and I. T. Baldwin . 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.  Google Scholar

13.

J. C. Medal and J. P. Cuda . 1999. Biological control of invasive weeds in Florida and the Caribbean region. In Proc. Caribbean Basin Administrative Group Workshop on Approaches to Mitigating the Effects of Exotic Pests on Trade and Agriculture in the Caribbean Region, 16-18 June 1999, Homestead, FL. University of Florida-Tropical Research Education Center, Homestead. Google Scholar

14.

J. C. Medal, D. Gandolfo, and J. P. Cuda . 2003. Biology of Gratiana boliviana, the First Biocontrol Agent Released to Control Tropical Soda Apple in the USA. University of Florida-IFAS Extension Circular ENY-826. 3pp.  Google Scholar

15.

J. J. Mullahey and D. L. Colvin . 1993. Tropical Soda Apple: A New Noxious Weed in Florida. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service Fact Sheet WRS-7.  Google Scholar

16.

J. J. Mullahey and J. Cornell . 1994. Biology of tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum) an introduced weed in Florida. Weed Technol 8:465–469. Google Scholar

17.

J. J. Mullahey, M. Nee, R. P. Wunderlin, and K. R. Delaney . 1993. Tropical soda apple: a new weed threat in subtropical regions. Weed Technol 7:783–786. Google Scholar

18.

SAS Institute 1996. JMP IN version 3. Cary, NC. Google Scholar

19.

M. J. Stout, K. V. Workman, and S. S. Duffey . 1996. Identity, spatial distribution, and variability of induced chemical responses in tomato plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl 79:255–271. Google Scholar

20.

M. J. Stout, K. V. Workman, R. M. Bostock, and S. S. Duffey . 1998. Stimulation and attenuation of induced resistance by elicitors and inhibitors of chemical induction in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) foliage. Entomol. Exp. Appl 86:267–279. Google Scholar

21.

J. S. Thaler 1999a. Induced resistance in agricultural crops: effect of jasmonic acid on herbivory and yield in tomato plants. Environ. Entomol 28:30–37. Google Scholar

22.

J. S. Thaler 1999b. Jasmonate-inducible plant defenses cause increased parasitism of herbivores. Nature 399:686–688. Google Scholar

23.

J. S. Thaler, M. J. Stout, R. Karban, and S. S. Duffey . 1996. Exogenous jasmonates simulate insect wounding in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in the laboratory and field. J. Chem Ecol 22:1767–1781. Google Scholar

Fig. 1.

A. Mean number (± SEM) of neonate Spodoptera exigua surviving to 2nd instar on non-induced TSA were significantly higher than on induced TSA plants (P < 0.038). Tukey’s HSD n = 5, α = 0.05. B. The mean number of neonate larvae surviving to 2nd instar was significantly higher on non-induced plants than induced plants (P < 0.029). Tukey’s HSD n = 5, α = 0.05. The artificial diet means and non-induced plant means were not statistically different in either experiment (P > 0.106 and P > 0.153 for A and B, respectively). Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different.

i0015-4040-91-4-566-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

A. Mean number (± SEM) of neonate Spodoptera eridania surviving to 2nd instar on non induced TSA were significantly higher than on induced TSA plants (P < 0.015). Tukey’s HSD n = 5, α = 0.05. B. Mean number of neonate larvae surviving to 2nd instar was significantly higher on non-induced plants than induced plants (P < 0.026). Tukey’s HSD n = 5, α = 0.05. The artificial diet means and non-induced plant means were not statistically different in either experiment (P > 0.498 and P > 0.856 for A and B, respectively). Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different.

i0015-4040-91-4-566-f02.gif

Fig. 3.

The mean PPO level of Spodoptera exigua induced and S. eridania induced tropical soda apple leaves were significantly higher than the non-induced plants (P < 0.008 and P < 0.003, respectively). Tukey’s HSD n = 8, α = 0.05.

i0015-4040-91-4-566-f03.gif
R. L. Hix, M. T. Kairo, and S. Reitz "Does Secondary Plant Metabolism Provide a Mechanism for Plant Defenses in the Tropical Soda Apple Solanum Viarum (Solanales: Solanaceae) against Spodoptera exigua and S. eridania (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)?," Florida Entomologist 91(4), 566-569, (1 December 2008). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040-91.4.566
Published: 1 December 2008
KEYWORDS
biological control
induced resistance
night shade
secondary plant defenses
Back to Top