Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2008 Modified Agar-based Diet for Small Scale Laboratory Rearing of Olive Fruit Fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Genc Hanife
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Five larval diets for laboratory rearing of Bactrocera oleae Gmelin were tested. These diets were based on soy hydrolysate, yeast, sugar, casein, wheat germ, microcellulose and agar. The quality of diets was evaluated by measuring larval and pupal survival, larval and pupal weights, and development times. The best results were obtained with an agar-based diet that was modified from the currently used cellulose-based diet for rearing olive fruit fly in mass rearing facilities. Under these conditions, 77% of the larvae reared on the new agar-based diet completed development and achieved higher pupal weight than larvae reared on the currently available cellulose diet. The average life cycle was completed in 25.2 ± 0.4 d on the agar diet, and other biological parameters were also very close to those on the cellulose diet. Olive fruit fly larvae were reared continuously and successfully for 4 generations on the new diet. The preparation of the new agar-based diet is simple, the cost is low, and it is useful for small-scale laboratory tests and rearing.

The olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae Gmelin, is the most important and widespread pest in olive growing countries in the Mediterranean basin (Economopoulos 2002). Control of this pest has been based on organophosphate insecticides for many decades, but their intensive use has lead to development of enzyme (acetylcholinesterase (AChE)) resistance due to the selection of 2 resistance mutations (I199V and G488S) (Vontas et al. 2002). The sterile insect technique (SIT) is one of the most promising control approaches for the future of fruit fly integrated management (Enkerlin & Mumford 1997; Hendrichs et al. 2002). A primary requirement for success of SIT of olive fruit flies is mass rearing of the flies on a larval diet of high efficiency and low cost.

Olive fruit flies cannot be reared on a completely defined synthetic diet because detailed nutritional information is lacking, but several artificial diets have been developed for rearing the flies. The first artificial diet developed by Hagen et al. (1963) for the olive fruit fly was based on dehydrated carrot powder and brewer’s yeast. This diet was used successfully for rearing more than 3 generations. Later, several artificial diets were reported as satisfactory for continuous rearing of the olive fly (Tzanakakis et al. 1966; Tzanakakis & Economopoulos 1967; Rey 1969; Tzanakakis et al. 1970; Mittler & Tsitsipis 1973; Tsitsipis 1975; Tsitisipis & Kontos 1983).

Rate of larval development, diet consistency, distribution of nutrients in the diet, microclimate conditions during larval feeding, availability of diet ingredients, and amount of consumed diet each play an important role in evaluating a satisfactory larval diet (Pašková 2007). The diet should be dense enough for larval movement and feeding but not be too wet or larvae may drown. Olive fruit fly larvae, like other tephritid larvae, typically crawl out of the rearing containers to pupariate (Pašková 2007).

Various nutritive and bulking components used in larval diets include agar, cellulose, ground corn cobs, Eucalyptus pulp, soy hydrolysate, yeast hydrolysate, roasted peanuts, chickpea seedlings, and sucrose (Tzanakakis 1989). Nutritive and bulking components can be costly and sometimes difficult to obtain in some countries, and diet components often have to be imported into some countries where rearing of olive fruit flies is desirable. Replacement of imported components by local products would be advantageous.

The objective of the present work was to develop a suitable and economic artificial diet based on alternative sources of protein and bulking agent for laboratory rearing of olive fruit flies in Turkey.

Materials and Methods

Olive Fruit Fly Colony

Olive flies were collected from infested olive fruits in 2006 in Canakkale province, Turkey. The diet developed by Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983), based on soy hydrolysate as the protein source, was used to maintain a laboratory colony. A detailed description of the rearing conditions can be found in Tzanakakis (1989). Green olive fruits for a natural diet were obtained from the local market. Colony flies were kept at 26 ± 1°C with 18:6 (L: D) photoperiod and 65% RH. Adult flies (100♀ : 70♂) were maintained (20 × 20 × 20 cm in dimension) on a diet of yeast hydrolysate: sucrose (1:3). Paraffin domes (6 cm in length and 3.5 cm in width), used as oviposition devices, were placed in the rearing cages for 2 h to obtain eggs. Eggs were washed off domes with 0.05% propionic acid solution and transferred to sterile black filter paper previously moistened with water. Eggs were incubated at 27°C until hatching.

Test and Control Diets

Five artificial diet formulations were experimentally tested. Two control diets, one developed by Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983), and the natural larval host of fresh green olives were included in all tests. The composition of the Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983) diet and experimental diets is shown in Table 1. Experimental and control diets were freshly prepared before each experiment, and fresh green olives were obtained from local markets in Canakkale, Turkey. The diet mixture was formulated by weighing all ingredients and mixing them in a 500-mL beaker with 206.3 mL of distilled water. Stirring continued until the diet ingredients appeared to be homogeneously mixed. The pH of all diets was adjusted to 3.8-4.0 with 2N HCl. Fifteen grams of diets were added to 6-cm disposable Petri dishes, with 5 Petri dishes used for each test diet and control, including 5 dishes with green olives. The 5 dishes of each diet were considered as 5 replicates. Olive fruit fly eggs were collected from several cages of colony flies, incubated at 27°C until hatching, and newly hatched larvae were collected with a camel-hair brush, and 100 larvae were transferred to each experimental and control diet within 2 h of hatching. Larval development was monitored daily under an Olympus SZX9 stereozoom microscope. When larvae began crawling out of a diet, the uncovered Petri dishes were transferred to sterile sand for pupation. Pupae were sifted from the sand after 5 d. For each Petri dish of diet, the following biological parameters were reported: percentage of mature larvae (total number of larvae produced from the number of 100 neonates), percentage of pupal recovery (total number of pupae produced from the number of original larvae), percentage of adult emergence, larval weight, pupal weight (at day 5 after pupariation), larval development time (from hatching until first larvae started to crawl out of diet to pupariate), pupal development time (from the onset of pupariation of the mature larvae until the emergence of the first adults), adult fecundity and longevity. Fecundity was based on daily egg collection from 10 pairs of flies held after a preoviposition period of 4 d. Diets were evaluated against the control diet (Tsitsipis and Kontos, 1983) and the natural diet of olives.

When an effective diet (diet C in Table 1) was identified from among the 5 experimental formulations tested, diet C, the Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983) control, and green olives were used to continuously rear 4 successive generations of olive fruit flies, with 5 replicates of diet in each generation. All experiments were conducted at 26 ± 1°C with 18:6 (L: D) photoperiod and 65% RH.

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics as mean values ± standard error (SE) were calculated. The differences among the diets quality control parameters were determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA).The LSD test at P = 0.05 level of significance was used to determine separation and significance of means (SAS 1999).

Results

Diet components, their quantity in a diet mixture, cost per kg, and cost of one batch of mixed diet (391 mL) are shown in Table 1. Diet evaluations based upon mature larvae reared (%), pupal recovery (%), adult emergence (%), weight of mature larvae and pupae, duration in larval and pupal stages, generation time, adult fecundity, and adult longevity are given in Table 2. Table 2 also includes data from rearing of flies on their natural diet of fresh olives. The natural diet of fresh olives is clearly the best diet in the tests, but the diet of Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983) is nearly as good as the olive diet, with only minor, but significant, variations in evaluated parameters. A significant problem with use of fresh olives is that they are available in Turkey and many other countries only from Sep through Jan. All measured parameters for the experimental diets A, B, C, D, and E were significantly different from each other for each of the 5 diets. Diets A, B, D, and E are not acceptable diets based on one or more measured parameters. Measured parameters for experimental diet C are comparable to the Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983) diet, with only minor, but statistically significant, differences in duration of pupal stage, and total generation time. Percent mature larvae reared, percent pupal recovery, percent adult emergence, larval and pupal weights, duration of larval stages, adult fecundity and longevity for flies on diet C were not different from values for the Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983) diet. Both diet C and the Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983) diet have a consistency that allows olive fruit fly larvae to move and feed easily, and to crawl out of the diet prior to pupariation. The fresh olive diet allowed slightly greater pupal recovery than diet C or the diet of Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983). There is no significant difference in pupal weight for the three diets. Except for the second generation, the percent adult emergence was not different for the 3 diets.

Data for pupal recovery, pupal weight, and adult emergence for each of 4 generations reared on diet C, the Tsitsipis & Kontos (1983) control, and green olives are shown in Table 3.

Discussion

Good survival and growth, mating behavior, ability to fly, and egg production are important criteria for insects reared on artificial diets (Chang et al. 2004; Chaudhury & Skoda 2007). The olive fruit fly has been mass reared for SIT programs for many years. Results of this study show that the new agar-based diet (diet C) has the potential for use as an olive fruit fly larval diet. Diet formula C was approximately equal to the cellulose control diet currently in use. Diet formulas D and E produced significantly smaller larvae, possibly indicating that insufficient nutrients for normal larval weight gain or imbalanced nutrients reduced larval growth. Diets A and B produced larvae that were just about as large as larvae produced by diet C, suggesting that these diets provided adequate nutrients, although development time was greater on diets A and B. The nutritional content of a diet can considerably affect development time, growth and survival of fruit fly larvae (Krainacker et al. 1987, Vargas et al. 1994).

Diet C components were easier to mix to homogeneous consistency than the control diet with its large amount of cellulose as a bulking agent. Although agar is more expensive (US $93.45/kg) than cellulose (US $34/kg), the amount of agar used in diet C is very low (2.52 g) and costs only $0.24 while the cellulose used in the control diet costs $3.92. Thus, the new formulation of diet C with agar reduces the cost of a batch of mixed diet to less than half that of the cellulose-based control diet (Table 1). Diet C is suitable for use in additional laboratory tests and evaluation as a rearing medium for olive fruit flies.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr. James L. Nation for comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was financially supported by the Turkish Government Planning Agency (DPT), the Section of Scientific Research Project (Projects Grant No: 2002 K120170-10) and The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, TUBITAK, (Projects Grant No: 105 O 558).

Reference Cited

1.

M. F. Chaudhury and S. R. Skoda . 2007. A cellulose fiber-based diet for screwworm (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larvae. J. Econ. Entomol 100:241–245. Google Scholar

2.

C. L. Chang, C. Caceres, and E. B. Jang . 2004. A novel liquid diet and its rearing system for melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 97(3):524–528. Google Scholar

3.

W. Enkerlin and J. Mumford . 1997. Economic evaluation of three alternative methods for control of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera:Tephritidae) in Israel, Palestinian territories, and Jordan. J. Econ. Entomol 90:1066–1072. Google Scholar

4.

S. Ekesi, P. W. Nderitu, and C. L. Chang . 2007. Adaptation to and small scale rearing of Invasive fruit fly Bactrocera invadens (Diptera:Tephritidae) on artificial diet. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 100(4):562–567. Google Scholar

5.

A. P. Economopoulos 2002. The Olive Fruit Fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) oleae (Gmelin) (Diptera: Tephritidae): Its Importance and Control; Revise SIT Research and Pilot Testing. Report to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, 44. Google Scholar

6.

A. P. Economopoulos, A. V. Voyadjoglou, and A. Giannakakis . 1976. Reproductive behavior and physiology of Dacus olea: fecundity as affected by mating, adult diet and artificial rearing. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 69:725–729. Google Scholar

7.

K. S. Hagen, L. Santas, and A. Tsecouras . 1963. A technique of culturing the olive fruit fly, Dacus oleae Gmel. on synthetic media under xenic conditions. pp. 333-356 In Radiation and Radioisotopes Applied to Insects of Agricultural Importance. Proceedings Symposium, Athens 22-26 April 1963, International Atomic Agency, Vienna, STI/PUB/74, 333-356. Google Scholar

8.

J. Hendrichs, A. S. Robinson, J. P. Cayol, and W. Enkerlin . 2002. Medfly area-wide sterile insect technique programmes for prevention, suppression or eradication: the importance of mating behavior studies. Florida Entomol 85:1–13. Google Scholar

9.

T. E. Mittler and A. Tsitsipis . 1973. Economical rearing of larvae of the olive fruit fly, Dacus oleae, on a liquid diet offered on cotton toweling. Entomol. Exp. Appl 16:292–293. Google Scholar

10.

I. Moore 1959. A method for artificially culturing the olive fly (Dacus oleae Gmelin.) under aseptic conditions. Ktavim 9:295–296. Google Scholar

11.

D. A. Krainacker, J. R. Carey, and R. J. Vargas . 1987. Effect of larval host on life history traits of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Oecologia 73:583–590. Google Scholar

12.

M. Pašková 2007. New larval agar-based diet for laboratory rearing of Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biologia, Bratislava 62(4):477–481. Google Scholar

13.

J. M. Rey 1969. Development of a larval diet for the rearing of Dacus oleae Gmel. 8th FAO ad hoc Conference on the Control of Olive pests and Diseases. Athens, 8-12 May. Google Scholar

14.

SAS Institute 1999. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 8.0. Vol.3. SAS Inst., Cary. NC.  Google Scholar

15.

J. A. Tsitsipis 1975. An improved method for the mass rearing of the olive fruit fly, Dacus oleae (Gmel.) (Diptera, Tephritidae). Z. Angrew. Entomol 83:419–426. Google Scholar

16.

J. A. Tsitsipis and A. Kontos . 1983. Improved solid adult diet for the olive fruit fly Dacus oleae. Entomol. Hellenica 1:24–29. Google Scholar

17.

M. E. Tzanakakis 1971. Rearing methods for the olive fruit fly Dacus oleae (Gmelin). Ann. School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Thessaloniki 14:293–326. Google Scholar

18.

M. E. Tzanakakis 1989. Small Scale Rearing. pp. 105-118 In A. S. Robinson and G. Hooper [eds.], Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 3B. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 105-118. Google Scholar

19.

M. E. Tzanakakis and A. P. Economopoulos . 1967. Two efficient larval diets for continuous rearing of the olive fruit fly. J. Econ. Entomol 60:660–663. Google Scholar

20.

M. E. Tzanakakis, A. P. Economopoulos, and J. A. Tsitsipis . 1966. Improved artificial food media for larvae Dacus oleae (Gmelin) (Diptera:Tephritidae). Z. Angrew. Entomol 59:127–130. Google Scholar

21.

M. E. Tzanakakis, A. P. Economopoulos, and J. A. Tsitsipis . 1970. Rearing and nutrition of the olive fruit fly. 1. Improved larval diet and simple containers. J. Econ. Entomol 63:317–318. Google Scholar

22.

R. I. Vargas, S. Mitchell, C. L. Hsu, and W. A. Walsh . 1994. Laboratory evaluation of diets of processed corncob, torula yeast, and wheat germ on four developmental stages of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol 87:91–95. Google Scholar

23.

J. G. Vontas, J. Hejazi, N. Hawkes, N. Cosmidis, M. Loukas, and J. Hemingway . 2002. Resistance-associated point mutations of organophosphate insensitive acetylcholinesterase in the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae. Insect Mol. Biol 11:329–336. Google Scholar

Table 1.

Composition of artificial diets used to rear Bactrocera oleae larvae in this study.

i0015-4040-91-4-651-t01.gif

Table 2.

Biological parameters (Mean ± SE) of olive fruit flies reared on artificial diets and natural diet of fresh olives.

i0015-4040-91-4-651-t02.gif

Table 3.

Comparison of percent Pupal recovery, pupal weight and percent adult emergence (Mean ± SE) of olive fruit fly reared on 2 artificial diets (Tsitsipis & Kontos 1983 and Diet C) and on olive fruits.

i0015-4040-91-4-651-t03.gif
Genc Hanife "Modified Agar-based Diet for Small Scale Laboratory Rearing of Olive Fruit Fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae)," Florida Entomologist 91(4), 651-656, (1 December 2008). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040-91.4.651
Published: 1 December 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top