Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2009 Biology of Stethoconus praefectus (Distant) (Heteroptera: Miridae), A Newly Established Predator of the Avocado Lace Bug, Pseudacysta perseae (Heteroptera: Tingidae), in Florida
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Asian plant bug Stethoconus praefectus (Distant) (Heteroptera: Miridae) was recently discovered in Florida preying on the avocado lace bug, Pseudacysta perseae (Heidemann) (Heteroptera: Tingidae). Its life cycle and effectiveness as a predator of P. perseae were investigated at 26 ±I°C, 60 ± 5 RH, and 12: 12 (L: D) under laboratory conditions. Stethoconus praefectus developed from egg to adult in 16.5 ± 0.2 d. On average, the first 4 instars consumed 2 to 4 prey per day, whereas the last 2 instars consumed 2 to 7 lace bugs per day. Stethoconus praefectus was observed in the field from Aug through Dec 2007.

The avocado lace bug, Pseudacysta perseae (Heteroptera: Tingidae), is a secondary pest of avocado and other Lauraceae in Florida, and other states within the continental United States (Peña et al. 1998; Wysoki et al. 2002; Hoddle et al. 2005), and in the Caribbean and northern South America (Streito & Morival 2005; Etienne & Streito 2008). Due to a resurgence of P. perseae densities in the 1990s, a survey for natural enemies was conducted in 1997 (Peña et al. 1998). During this survey, Chrysoperla rufilabris (Burmeister) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Paracarniella cubana (Bruner) (erroneously identified then as Hyaliodes vitripennis (Say)) (Heteroptera: Miridae) were observed as the most common predators of P. perseae in south Florida (Peña et al. 1998). In 2006, two additional predators were discovered, a new lestodiplosine midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), Tingidoletes praelonga (Gagné et al. 2008), and an adventive Asian plant bug, Stethoconus praefectus (Distant) (Heteroptera: Miridae) (Henry et al. in press), the latter of which is treated in this paper.

Species of Stethoconus are considered obligate lace bug predators (Mathen & Kurian 1972; Henry et al. 1986; Neal et al. 1991; Wheeler 2001). For example, S. japonicus Schumacher preys on the lace bug Stephanitis pyriodes (Scott) (Neal et al. 1991), S. pyri (Mella) (as S. cryptopeltis Flor) preys on Tingis pyri Fabricius (Gautier 1927), and S. praefectus has been recorded preying on the coconut lace bug, Stephanitis typicus, in India (Mathen & Kurian 1972). The life history of S. praefectus feeding on S. typicus was studied by Mathen & Kurian (1972). The potential importance of S. praefectus in Florida prompted us to investigate its life cycle and efficacy as a predator of P. perseae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A laboratory colony of S. praefectus was established with adults collected from avocado plants in a greenhouse located at the University of Florida, Tropical Research and Education Center (TREC), Homestead, FL (25E30′ N, 80E30′, 1 m altitude). The conditions of the rearing and laboratory experiments were 26 ± I°C ± 5 RH, and 12:12 (L:D). Adults and nymphs of P. perseae and nymphs of S. praefectus were transferred into clear Plexiglass® cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) with avocado leaves held in a vial of water as a food source and as an oviposition substrate. Every other day, sections of leaves containing newly deposited S. prafectus eggs were removed and placed in large petri dishes (5 × 1.5 cm) lined with a disk of paper filter and an avocado leaf. Newly emerged nymphs of S. praefectus were transferred to individual petri dishes, containing sections of an avocado leaf. Approximately 10 each of P. perseae nymphs and adults were introduced on the petri dish as food. Every 2 d, leaves and dead lace bugs were removed and replaced until S. praefectus adults emerged.

Development Time of S. praefectus and Efficacy of Nymphs as Predators

Stethoconus praefectus adults (females and males) that were 1 d old were confined in clear Plexiglass cages and provided with avocado lace bugs as described above. After 24 h, S. praefectus adults were removed and 32 eggs were chosen randomly and labeled. Avocado leaf sections containing S. praefectus eggs were placed in petri dishes (3 × 1 cm) layered with a filter paper and observed until eclosion. Once eggs hatched, newly emerged nymphs were placed in small, individual petri dishes (3 × 1 cm), with a layer of agar (1.2 g of agar in 100 mL of water) covering the bottom, topped with a circular section of an avocado leaf, and sealed with punctured Clingwrap®. A total of 10 adults and nymphs of the avocado lace bug were provided daily as food. The petri dish was turned upside down to simulate the natural P. perseae feeding conditions on the abaxial leaf side. Dead P. perseae were counted and removed daily and the development of S. praefectus was recorded. Fresh sections of avocado leaves were renewed every 2–3 d following the same procedure as described above. Developmental time from egg to adult, sex ratio, and avocado lace bugs eaten per instar were recorded. The experiment was replicated 32 times. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA for unequal replication by the Student-Newman-Keuls Test (SAS Institute 1999). Data are expressed as mean ± standard error.

Predator Efficacy of S. praefectus Adults

Newly emerged S. praefectus adults were isolated for 24 h on avocado leaves with lace bugs in a clear Plexiglass cage. After sex determination, males and females were placed in petri dishes with a disk of filter paper covering the bottom and topped with a section of an avocado leaf as described above. Mixed instars of avocado lace bugs (n = 15) were provided as food. Every other day, dead lace bugs were counted and removed until all S. praefectus adults died. The results were analyzed by a t-test for 2 groups with Proc. TTEST (SAS Institute 1999). Data are expressed as mean ± standard error.

Densities of S. praefectus in Florida

Twenty avocado leaves with symptoms of P. perseae feeding were collected monthly (May-Dec 2007) from the avocado orchard of the USDA, ARS, Subtropical Horticulture Research Station, Miami, Florida (25E38′40.69″N, 80E17′50.47″). Leaves were placed in a cooler and brought to the laboratory and inspected for the presence of P. persea, as well as eggs, nymphs, or adults of any predators. Egg predators were placed in 5-mL sealed vials as described above. Nymphs were identified to species.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Developmental Time

Eggs of S. praefectus are inserted individually on the mid and lateral veins on the adaxial surface of avocado leaves (Henry et al. 2009). Eggs hatched within 7.2 ± 0.1 d. There were from 5 to 6 instars for both sexes. The development time for S. praefectus from egg to adult for the 5-instar group was 14.3 to 15.8 d for females and males, respectively, and 17.6 to 19.4 d for the 6-instar group (Table 1).

The duration of the life cycle when S. praefectus fed on P. perseae was similar to that of this lace bug when it fed on Stephanitis typicus (Mathen & Kurian 1972). The only major difference between the two studies is that we observed 5 to 6 instars, whereas Mathen & Kurian (1972) observed only 5. Variation in number of instars in Heteroptera has been found for other predacious mirids (Liquide & Nishida 1985), as well as for phytophagous species (Slansky & Rodriguez 1987).

Predator Efficacy of S. praefectus Nymphs

Predation by S. praefectus nymphs increased from the first to the last instar. Last instars (either fifth or sixth) killed significantly more P. perseae nymphs and adults than any preceding instar (F = 12.70; df 5, 291, P = 0.05). On average, the first 4 instars consumed 2 to 4 prey per d, whereas the last 2 instars consumed 2 to 7 lace bugs per d (Table 2). These results differ from those of Mathen & Kurian (1972), who found that fewer prey were consumed by the fifth instar.

Table 1

Development time (mean ± SE) for S. praefectus (days).

t01_54.gif

Table 2

Daily consumption by each instar of S. praefectus and natural mortality (mean ± SE).

t02_54.gif

Longevity and Predator Efficacy of S. praefectus Adults

Adult females of S. praefectus lived longer and consumed more prey than adult males (Table 3). According to Neal et al. (1991) and Mathen & Kurian (1972), the total number of prey killed by adults of the genus Stethoconus is higher because adulthood lasts longer than immature stages.

Densities of S. praefectus Under Field Conditions

The number of P. perseae increased from Jul through Sep and decreased during the fall of 2007 (Fig. 1). Stethoconus praefectus was not observed until Aug and the population peaked in Oct (Fig. 1). Our results indicate that S. praefectus is an important predator of P. perseae and, together with other predators, could cause significant cumulative mortality. For instance the chrysopid C. rufilabris causes a cumulative mortality of 75% of P. perseae, preferring nymphs over eggs and adults (Peña et al. 1998); the plant bug Paracarniella cubana feeds on eggs and nymphs, causing a 30% reduction of P. perseae during a 4-day observation period (Pena, unpublished data). No data are available on the effectiveness of the other newly discovered predator, the cecidomyiid Tingidoletes praelonga (Gagné et al. 2008), but it likely contributes to the overall mortality of P. perseae. As a consequence, S. praefectus, together with other predators present in the area, might be responsible for keeping densities of P. perseae at low levels in Florida compared with other localities, such as Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic (Etienne & Streito 2008) where the apparent lack of natural enemies makes P. perseae a serious problem.

Table 3

Longevity (days) and predator efficacy of S. praefectus males and females, and natural mortality of P. persea in the absence of S. praefectus (mean ± SE).

t03_54.gif

Fig 1.

Pseudacysta perseae and predators found per avocado leaf at the USDA, Miami, Florida (mean ± SE) (May-Dec 2007).

f01_54.eps

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Nancy Epsky (USDA, ARS, Miami), Josep Jacas (Univerisa Jaume I, Castell, Spain), Michael G. Pogue (Systematic Entomology Laboratory [SEL], USDA, ARS, Washington, DC), F. Christian Thompson (SEL), and Alfred G. Wheeler, Jr. (Clemson University, Clemson, SC) for critically reviewing this manuscript, and David Long (University of Florida, Homestead) for help with fieldwork and laboratory rearing. This research was partially supported by a grant from the California Department of Agriculture to JEP.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

J. Etienne , and J. C. Streito 2008. Premier signalaement en Guadeloupe et en Martinique de Pseudacysta perseae (Heidemann, 1908), un ravageur de l’ avocatier (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Bull. Soc. Entomol. France 113: 121–122. Google Scholar

2.

R. J. Gagné , J. E. Peña , and F. Acevedo 2008. A new lestodiplisine (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) preying on the avocado lace bug, Pseudacysta perseae (Heteroptera: Tingidae) in southern Florida. Florida Entomol. 91: 43–47. Google Scholar

3.

C. Gautier . 1927. A propos de Stethoconus cyrtopeltis Flor. [Hem. Capsidae] ennemi de Tingis pyri Fab. [Hem. Tingitidae]. Bull. Soc. Entomol. France 2: 26–27. Google Scholar

4.

T. J. Henry , J. W. Neal Jr. , and K. M. Gott 1986. Stethoconus japonicus (Heteroptera: Miridae): A predator of Stephanitis lace bugs newly discovered in the United States, promising in the biocontrol of azalea lace bug (Heteroptera: Tingidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 88: 722–730. Google Scholar

5.

T. J. Henry, J. E. Peña, D. Long, and F. Acevedo 2009. Stethoconus praefectus (Hemiptera: Miridae): First North American records of an Old World predatory plant bug preying on avocado lace bug, Pseudacysta perseae (Hemiptera: Tingidae), in Florida. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington (in press). Google Scholar

6.

M. S. Hoddle , J. Morse , R. Stoouthamer , E. Humeres , G. Jeong W. Rotsch , G. S. Bender , P. Phillips , Kellum , D. Robert , and W. Witney 2005. Avocado lace bug in California. California Avocado Society Yearbook 88: 67–79. Google Scholar

7.

N. Liquido , and T. Nishida 1985. Variation in number of instars, longevity, and fecundity of Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 78: 459–463. Google Scholar

8.

K. Mathen and C. Kurian 1972. Description, life-history and habits of Stethoconus praefectus (Distant) (Heteroptera: Miridae) predacious on Stephanitis typicus (Distant) (Heteroptera: Tingidae), a pest of coconut palm. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 42: 255–262. Google Scholar

9.

J. W. Neal , R. H. Haldemann , and T. J. Henry 1991. Biological control potential of a Japanese plant bug Stethoconus japonicus (Heteroptera: Miridae), an adventive predator of the azalea lace bug (Heteroptera: Tingidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 84(3): 287–293. Google Scholar

10.

J. E. Peña , S. Sundhari , A. Hunsberger , and R. Duncan 1998. Monitoring, damage, natural enemies and control of avocado lace bug, Pseudacysta perseae (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Proc. Florida St. Hort. Soc. 111: 330–334. Google Scholar

11.

SAS Institute. 1999. SAS version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar

12.

F. Lansky , and J. G. Rodriguez 1987. Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders and Related Invertebrates. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1016 pp. Google Scholar

13.

J. C. Streito , and Y. Morival 2005. Première capture en Guyane française de Pseudacysta perseae (Heidemann, 1908) un ravageur de l'avocatier (Heteroptera: Tingidae). Nouv. Rev. Entomol. 22: 191–192. Google Scholar

14.

A. G. Wheeler Jr. 2001. Biology of the Plant Bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae). Pests, Predators, Opportunists. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York. 507 pp. Google Scholar

15.

M. Wysoki, M. A. Van De Berg, G. Ish-Am, G. Gazit, J. E. Peña, and G. K. G. waite 2002. Pests and pollinators of avocado, pp. 223–293 In J. E. Peña , J. L. Sharp, and M. Wysoki [eds.], Tropical Fruit Pests and Pollinators: Biology, Economic Importance, Natural Enemies and Control. CABI Publ., Wallingford, UK. 430 pp. Google Scholar
C. M. Holguin, J. E. Peña, T. J. Henry, and F. Acevedo "Biology of Stethoconus praefectus (Distant) (Heteroptera: Miridae), A Newly Established Predator of the Avocado Lace Bug, Pseudacysta perseae (Heteroptera: Tingidae), in Florida," Florida Entomologist 92(1), 54-57, (1 March 2009). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.092.0109
Published: 1 March 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top