Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2009 Biological Control of Fenusa pusilla (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) in the Northeastern United States: A Thirty-Four Year Perspective on Efficacy
R. Casagrande, R. G. Van Driesche, M. Mayer, R. Fuester, D. Gilrein, L. Tewksbury, H. Faubert
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Parasitoid releases against the birch leafminer Fenusa pusilla (Lepeletier) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) in eastern North America began in 1974, with releases in eastern Canada, followed by others in the Middle Atlantic States and New England. Of 4 parasitoids released, only 1, the ichneumonid Lathrolestes nigricollis (Thompson), established and spread widely. Studies of its preliminary impacts were made in several locations in the 1980s and 1990s, but full impact of the parasitoid on host density was not yet achieved in that period. Here we report results of surveys in 7 states (MA, CT, RI, NY, PA, NJ, DE) in 2007 documenting the current birch leaf miner levels (as % of leaves mined in spring) and parasitism. Survey results show that the pest has declined dramatically to barely detectable levels in 5 states (MA, CT, RI, NY, PA) but that in southern NJ, the pest remains abundant (ca 50% leaves mined) despite significant parasitism levels. Survey results, in context with previous evaluations made when populations were still declining, show that the project has been completely successful in much of the northeastern USA, but that there is a southern limit to efficacy in mid-New Jersey. Possible reasons for lack of control in this area, in contrast to high levels of control elsewhere, are discussed.

Birch leafminer (Fenusa pusilla [Lepeletier]) (= pumila Klug) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), an invasive Palearctic leaf mining sawfly attacking several species of Betula, has been present in North America for at least 85 years, and was first recorded in Connecticut (Friend 1933). When high proportions of tree leaves are mined, browning makes ornamental birches unsightly, although damage does not normally cause tree death. Investigations on natural sources of mortality associated with the pest in Connecticut (Friend 1933) and Quebec (Cheng & LeRoux 1965, 1969, 1970) showed that parasitism of larvae was insignificant (<5%) compared to the situation in the its native range in central Europe, where parasitism was much higher (38–47%) (Eichhorn & Pschorn-Walcher 1973). This difference prompted the initiation of classical biological control programs in both Canada and the USA, leading to the release of 4 parasitoids: the ichneumonids Lathrolestes nigricollis (Thompson) and Grypocentrus albipes Ruthe, the braconid Phanomeris sp., and the eulophid Chrysocharis nitetis (Walker). The ichneumonids were released in Canada (Quebec and Newfoundland) from 1974–75 (Raske & Jones 1975; Guèvremont & Quednau 1977), and all 4 species were released in NJ, DE, MD, and PA between 1976 and 1982 (Fuester et al. 1984). Later, releases of just the 2 ichneumonids were made in MA (1979–1980), in MA and RI (1989–1991) (Van Driesche et al. 1997), and western Canada in the 1990s (Langor et al. 2000).

Here we present information on the efficacy of these releases in the northeastern United States. A preliminary evaluation (Van Driesche et al. 1997) of the status of the pest in MA and RI conducted from 1990–1995, showed that the pest had declined locally around the principal MA release site in Amherst from 54% of leaves mined in spring to just 3%. Furthermore, by 1995 a difference had developed between Amherst, MA (at various non-release sites within 4 km of the 1980 release site) versus a similar town (Northampton) located 15–20 km from the release point. In the Northampton area, where the parasitoid would have arrived later, 33% of spring birch leaves were still being mined and only 14% of the larvae were parasitized by L. nigricollis. In contrast, in Amherst, closer to the original release site, only 6% of spring leaves were mined and 28% of the larvae were parasitized (Van Driesche et al. 1997). This suggests that at that point in time, there was a zone, centered on the original release area, where the pest was controlled, while further away control was still developing.

Preliminary data published previously, while suggesting the existence by the 1990s of local areas of pest suppression, do not reflect the full extent of area-wide pest control caused by this classical biological control project. Here, we present results of a set of state-level surveys carried out in spring of 2007 by the authors to determine the current abundance of F. pusilla mines on birch species in the northeast USA. Surveys were run in RI and CT (Casagrande), Massachusetts (Van Driesche), New Jersey (Mayer), Pennsylvania and Delaware (Fuester) and Long Island, New York (Gilrein).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling in Rhode Island (1990–2008)

Beginning in 1990, the second year of releases of L. nigricollis in RI, Casagrande and colleagues sampled for parasitism at a release site in Ryan Park in North Kingstown. Samples consisted of 100 leaves, haphazardly selected from a stand of small (ca. 2–4 m) grey birch, Betula populifolia Marshall, on the edge of large block of deciduous forest. Individual leaves were plucked (without looking at them) from branches distributed throughout the site from leaves accessible from the ground and were then returned to the laboratory where larvae were removed and dissected. Samples were timed to closely precede larval drop from the leaves for pupation. We did not measure leaf damage until 1996, as until then it appeared that all leaves in the stand were damaged. Beginning in 1996, we noted whether there was any birch leafminer damage to the leaves collected for parasitism measurements. The site was sampled from 1990 to 2008 except for 1992–93 and 2001–03. Leaf damage for 1990 was determined by examining photographs of the sample site taken in late May of that year.

State Surveys in 2007

Surveys were done in 7 states (MA, RI, CT, NY [Long Island only], PA, NJ, DE) (Fig. 1) in May and Jun of 2007 (Table 1). The survey was conducted along roadsides in urban, suburban, or rural residential areas where grey or white (Betula papyrifera Marshall) birch trees were present in landscapes or naturally occurring along roadsides. Following haphazard routes in such areas, birch trees were examined when encountered. From each tree, 100 leaves were plucked without looking at them and then examined to determine the number of leaves bearing distinctive F. pusilla mines. Leaves with leafminer larvae (from these samples and supplemental samples) were taken to the laboratory and dissected to detect eggs or larvae of L. nigricollis. State summaries were computed as the percentage of leaves with F. pusilla mines (summed over all sites) and the percentage of birch leafminer larvae parasitized (summed over all larvae from all sites). One exception to this process was that data from NJ were kept separate by location because strong differences occurred between sites in northern versus southern NJ. For comparison, the state was split into northern (40°NL or above) and southern (below 40°NL) parts.

Fig. 1.

Areas (ellipses) surveyed for birch leafminer (Fenusa pusilla) and its parasitoid Lathrolestes nigricollis in 2007.

f01_243.eps

TABLE 1.

PERCENTAGE OF GREY OR PAPER BIRCH LEAVES MINED BY FENUSA PUSILLA AND PERCENTAGE OF LEAF MINER LARVAE PARASITIZED BY THE ICHNEUMONID LATHROLESTES NIGRICOLLIS IN SEVEN NORTHEASTERN STATES IN 2007.

t01_243.gif

RESULTS

Birch leafminer populations have come under complete biological control in all areas surveyed above 40°NL (mid-New Jersey). Mined leaves were extremely difficult to find in MA, CT, RI, PA, and NY (Long Island) (Table 1). In these areas, birch leafminer larvae could not be recovered in large enough numbers to estimate rates of parasitism. In New Jersey, density of the pest has been suppressed at most sites north of 40°NL, but south of this latitude, pest densities remain high (Fig. 2). Parasitism in sites above 40°NL (57.9%, 114/197) was approximately double the 27.5% (25/91) rate found in southern NJ. Infestations of birch leafminer at Newark, DE, were highly variable, with the incidence of mined leaves ranging from 0 to 57% on different trees and averaging 10.4%, intermediate between New Jersey and the other states. Parasitism was low (1.2%), but samples were taken when most of the mines were small. Because Lathrolestes nigricollis females prefer to attack semi-mature and mature larvae (Eichhorn & Pschorn-Walcher 1993), sample timing may have caused parasitism to be underestimated.

Some insight into the development of control over several decades is available from the repeated sampling of one site in RI, where annual samples were taken in most years from 1990 to 2008 (Fig. 3), and at this location, it is clear that the percentage of leaves mined fell from about 87% (avg. for 1990, 1996, 1997, 1998) to about 2.6% (average for 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008). During this same period, the rate of larval parasitism by L. nigricollis rose steadily from an average of 5.5% (1990, 1991, 1992, 1995, and 1996) to a high of 38% in 2004. Thereafter, too few mines were present to obtain larvae to examine for parasitism.

Fig. 2.

Percentage of birch leaves mined in 2007 by birch leafminer versus latitude in New Jersey, showing lack of control in southern New Jersey (left) versus much greater pest suppression in northern New Jersey (right).

f02_243.eps

DISCUSSION

Fenusa pusilla, which remained a high-density pest in the northeastern United States throughout the 20th century, has now come under complete biological control in MA, CT, RI, NY (Long Island), PA, and northern NJ due to the introduced parasitoid L. nigricollis. In southern NJ, the pest remains abundant despite relatively high levels of parasitism. In DE, populations of the pest are variable but lower than in southern NJ. However parasitism rates observed in our DE samples were also low. Why the pest has not been suppressed in southern NJ or DE is unknown. In terms of time, these areas have been colonized for a longer period than the more northerly regions where the pest has declined, so it seems unlikely to be merely a transitional phase moving toward control. Poor control by the parasitoid in southern NJ may relate to poor photoperiodic match between the region from which the parasitoid was originally collected (Austria, at 47–48°NL) and our sample areas in southern NJ (<40°NL), or may be due to southern NJ's higher summer temperatures. Mismatch of photoperiod can limit parasitoid impact if adult emergence is not well timed to the availability of the correct host stage, or if the percentages of the parasitoid population that enter diapause in the first and second generations differ from the diapause rates of the pest in the corresponding generations (Nealis 1985; Van Driesche et al. 1997). In DE, scarcity of suitable birch species also may be important. Only 2 species of birch (Betula lenta L. and Betula nigra L.) occur naturally in Delaware (Taber 1995) and of these, B. nigra is not a preferred host for F. pusilla. Preferred species such as gray birch or European species exist only as planted landscaping trees, and these are often in stressed condition due to climate. Further research is needed in NJ and DE to clarify the importance of these factors.

Fig. 3.

Percentage of grey birch leaves mined by first generation Fenusa pusilla and percentage of larvae parasitized by Lathrolestes nigricollis at Ryan Park in North Kingston, RI, between 1990 and 2008. (Years with no bars prior to 2004 are missing data. After 2005, larvae, and hence parasitism, were undetectable).

f03_243.eps

The results of our surveys illustrate the importance of continued monitoring of a classical biological control project for a very extended period, here 34 years since the first releases. Evaluations on short time scales (3–6 years), typical of many research projects, may be premature and underestimate ultimate impacts of new biocontrol agents.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Cooperative State Research Extension, Education Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Agricultural Experiment Stations of participating states with coordination through the regional biological control project NE1032.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

H. H. Cheng , and E. J. Leroux 1965. Preliminary life tables and notes on mortality factors of the birch leaf miner, Fenusa pusilla (Lepeletier) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), on blue birch, Betula caerulea grandis Blanchard, in Quebec. Annal. Soc. Entomol. du Québec 11: 81–104. Google Scholar

2.

H. H. Cheng , and E. J. Leroux 1969. Parasites and predators of the birch leafminer, Fenusa pusilla (Hymenoptera: Tentrhedinidae) in Quebec. Canadian Entomol. 101: 839–846. Google Scholar

3.

H. H. Cheng , and E. J. Leroux 1970. Major factors in survival of the immature stages of Fenusa pusilla in southwestern Quebec. Canadian Entomol. 102: 995–1002. Google Scholar

4.

O. Eichhorn , and H. Pschorn-Walcher 1973. The parasites of the birch leaf mining sawfly (Fenusa pusilla [Lep.]) (Hym.: Tenthredinidiae) in central Europe. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Tech. Bull. 16: 79–104. Google Scholar

5.

R. B. Friend 1933. The birch leaf mining sawfly, Fenusa pumila Klug. Bull Conn. Agric. Station (New Haven) 348: 291–364. Google Scholar

6.

R. W. Fuester , P. B. Taylor , W. H. Day , R. M. Hendrickson , and E. M. Blumenthal 1984. Introduction of exotic parasitoids for biological control of the birch leafminer (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) in the middle Atlantic states. J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 1565–1570. Google Scholar

7.

H. C. Guèvremont , and F. W. Quednau 1977. Introducion de parasites ichneumonides pour la lutte biologique contre Fenusa pusilla (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) au Québec. Canadian Entomol. 109: 1545–1548. Google Scholar

8.

D. W. Langor , S. C. Digweed , D. J. M. Williams , J. R. Spence , and C. Saunders 2000. Establishment and spread of two introduced parasitoids (Ichneumonidae) of the birch leafminer, Fenusa pusilla (Tenthredinidae). BioControl 45: 415–423. Google Scholar

9.

V. Nealis 1985. Diapause and the seasonal ecology of the introduced parasite Cotesia (Apanteles) rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Canadian Entomol.117: 33–342. Google Scholar

10.

A. G. Raske , and J. M. Jones 1975. Introduction of parasitoids of the birch leafminer into Newfoundland. Bi-Monthly Res. Notes 31(3): 20–21. Google Scholar

11.

W. S. Taber. 1995. Delaware Trees, 3rd ed., Delaware Department of Agriculture Forestry Service, Dover, Delaware, 284 pp. Google Scholar

12.

R. G. Van Driesche , R. Childs , R. A. Casagrande , and L. Tewksbury 1997. Establishment, distribution, and impact in southern New England of Lathrolestes nigricollis (Thompson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), an introduced parasitoid of the birch leafminer, Fenusa pusilla (Lepeletier) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Canadian Entomol. 129: 601–611. Google Scholar
R. Casagrande, R. G. Van Driesche, M. Mayer, R. Fuester, D. Gilrein, L. Tewksbury, and H. Faubert "Biological Control of Fenusa pusilla (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) in the Northeastern United States: A Thirty-Four Year Perspective on Efficacy," Florida Entomologist 92(2), 243-247, (1 June 2009). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.092.0207
Published: 1 June 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top