Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2009 Occurrence of Camponotus pennsylvanicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Trees Previously Infested with Enaphalodes rufulus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Black carpenter ants, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (DeGeer), are nearly ubiquitous in North American forests. These ants are documented as predators of red oak borer, Enaphalodes rufulus (Haldeman), a native longhorn beetle that experienced an unprecedented population increase synonymous with an oak decline event in the oak hickory forests of the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas from the late 1990s until 2005. We examined previous red oak borer emergence holes, tree crown conditions, and site aspects in 13 pre-established vegetation monitoring plots and correlated these forest and tree attributes with the presence or absence of black carpenter ants. At each site, all red oaks >10 cm diameter at breast height were baited for black carpenter ants with a mixture of tuna and honey. Black carpenter ants were more frequently found on trees with low levels of previous red oak borer infestation versus those trees with previously high infestations. These data suggest a potential role for black carpenter ants in the dynamics of red oak borer populations. Distribution of black carpenter ants in red oaks prior to and during the outbreak is unknown. Future investigations should be directed at efforts to understand whether black carpenter ants simply prefer different tree and site attributes than red oak borer or if, via predation, these ants are acting as agents of red oak borer control.

Red oak borer, Enaphalodes rufulus (Haldeman) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), is a native wood-boring beetle that has been implicated as a significant agent of tree mortality in a large-scale red oak decline event (>300,000 hectares) that occurred throughout the Ozark and Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas and Missouri (Stephen et al. 2001; Heitzman 2003; Fierke et al. 2005a). This red oak borer outbreak occurred from 1999–2005 and was unprecedented in scale (Riggins 2008). During the outbreak, over 5000 larval attacks were found on a single tree and an average of 77 living larvae were found in felled trees (Fierke et al. 2005b). Previous studies of red oak borer in the northeastern United States document the insect at low densities and do not report tree mortality associated with infestations (e.g., Hay 1974).

Cannibalism, woodpeckers, carpenterworms (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) (Hay 1972; Donley and Acciavatti 1980; Galford 1985; Ware and Stephen 2006) and ants were cited as agents of red oak borer egg and larval mortality, and ants may be responsible for 13–29% of red oak borer predation at endemic levels (Galford 1985). Evidence from multiple studies confirms that carpenter ants are predators of a variety of forest pests (Parmelee 1941; Allen et al. 1970; Smirnoff 1959; Youngs and Campbell 1984; Feicht and Acciavatti 1985; Galford 1985). Muilenberg et al. (2008) reported that 2 species of ants, black carpenter ants, Camponotus pennsylvanicus DeGeer (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and Aphaenogaster tennessensis Mayr removed 70% of artificially planted red oak borer eggs from tree surfaces in 1 h. Red oak borer DNA was detected in the guts of field-collected black carpenter ants, further confirming their role as predators of red oak borer (Muilenberg et al. 2008). Red oak borers laid an average of 119 eggs per female, with a mean egg viability of 99% (Donley 1978), suggesting that without significant egg predation, rates of tree colonization may be very high.

The relationship between black carpenter ant and red oak borer distribution may provide insight into factors influencing the recent red oak borer population explosion and decline in the Ozark Mountains. The objective of this study was to correlate the presence of black carpenter ants on previously infested red oaks to previous numbers of red oak borer emergence holes, site aspects and tree conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three geographic locations, Fly Gap, White Rock, and Oark (UTM Zone 15-N NAD83: Fly Gap: 431660, 3954978; White Rock: 412668, 3949429; Oark: 450792, 3952369), within the Ozark National Forest were chosen for this study. These 3 locations are in areas previously identified as experiencing high red oak mortality and have been monitored for red oak borer since 2001 (Fierke et al. 2007). Stands at these locations were 70–100 years old and on shallow rocky limestone and sandstone soils (USDA Forest Service 1993; Starkey et al. 2000). Plots at each location, when originally established, had an average of 493 trees per ha (Fierke et al. 2007).

Each of these locations had a single pre-established 30 × 100 meter fixed-area rectangular vegetation plot on each of north, south, east, and west benches and ridges in which all northern red oaks had been annually monitored since 2001 for red oak borer attack holes, emergence holes, tree crown conditions, and red oak mortality (Fierke et al. 2005b). Although 15 plots were available for use, only 13 of the plots were used. The ridge plot at White Rock had been highly impacted by tree removal and the west bench plot at Fly Gap had been treated with prescribed fire, so they were deemed unsuitable and excluded.

In each plot, all red oaks larger than 10 cm diameter at breast height (1.3 m above the ground, hereafter DBH) were identified and marked. Trees were baited with 5 mL of 1:1 mixture of clover honey and tuna in oil (Cannon 1998). Baits were placed in 10-mL paper cups and a single bait cup was affixed to each tree at breast height with aluminum nails. The bait was left undisturbed in the plot for 1 h, because previous studies report that 70% of red oak borer eggs are removed from the tree within the first hour of observation (Muilenberg et al. 2008). Ants within the bait cup or conspicuously visible on the bole of the tree were collected and returned to the laboratory for identification. All trees were evaluated on a presence/absence basis, because the number of ants present on a tree gives little indication of the number of colonies or individuals per unit area (Kilpelainen et al. 2005). All trees were sampled once during 06:00–11:00 h from 20 May 2007–9 Jun 2007 because carpenter ants typically do not forage in extreme afternoon heat (Nuss et al. 2005). In a related study in the Ozark Mountains, 95% of trees sampled a second time by the methodology described above reported the same presence (or absence) of ants. Therefore, a single sample per tree was taken as it allowed for a greater number of independent samples, which is of more statistical value than repeated measures on fewer samples (Verble & Stephen 2009).

Tree classes were developed during the red oak borer outbreak to rapidly assess large numbers of trees for decline and damage. Tree classes reflect the recent history of red oak borer colonization on individual trees and utilize the number of red oak borer emergence holes in the basal 2 m of a tree and the percent dieback in the tree crown to group trees into 3 classes: I, II and III. Class I trees have the fewest red oak borer emergence holes and healthiest crown, and Class III trees have the most red oak borer emergence holes and the least healthy crown, while Class II is an intermediate to Classes I and III; this method is explained in detail in Fierke et al. 2005b. Records of these tree classes were compared with current presence of black carpenter ants for all trees within study plots.

Numbers of red oak borer emergence holes visible in 2005 (the last year of the outbreak) were categorized as “high” (>5 visible red oak borer emergence holes on the basal 2 m of the tree) or “low” (0–5 visible red oak borer emergence holes on the basal 2 m of the tree). These categories were compared to current presence of black carpenter ants for all trees within the study plots.

Data were summarized as percentages of trees of a given attribute (e.g., aspect) with black carpenter ants present and normalized with arc-sine transformation. The presence of ants was analyzed in relation to aspect, DBH, geographic location, tree class, and red oak borer emergence hole classes. All relationships were tested with a oneway ANOVA and Tukey pairwise comparison tests. Data were analyzed with JMP 7.0 (SAS Institute 2007). Voucher specimens of ants were deposited in the Insect Museum at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.

RESULTS

A total of 328 red oaks were surveyed for ants in this study. Stand characteristics are reported in Table 1. An overall mean of 77.1% of red oaks had ants present (SE = 2%). Aspect was not significantly correlated to black carpenter ant presence (P = 0.43). Geographic location within the Ozark National Forest did not significantly influence black carpenter ant presence (P = 0.21).

Tree class was significantly correlated to black carpenter ant presence (P = 0.003) (Fig. 1). Ant presence on Class I and Class II trees was not significantly different; however, ants were present significantly less frequently on Class III trees than on either Class I or Class II trees.

Black carpenter ants were present on a significantly higher percent of trees with low numbers (0–5) of red oak borer emergence holes than trees with high numbers (>5) red oak borer emergence holes (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Ants were present on 29% of trees with high numbers of red oak borer emergence holes, whereas ants were present on 81% of trees with low numbers of red oak borer emergence holes.

TABLE 1.

STAND CHARACTERISTICS FOR ALL PLOTS SURVEYED (INCLUDING ASPECT), INCLUDING NUMBER OF RED OAKS, MEAN AND STANDARD ERROR OF DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH) (CM) AND DBH RANGE. SUMMARY STATISTICS, IN ITALICS, ARE PRESENTED FOR EACH GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION AND ALL PLOTS.

t01_304.gif

Black carpenter ant presence was significantly affected by tree DBH (P<0.001). Ants are more likely to be present on large diameter trees than on small ones. This was an anticipated result and is detailed in Verble and Stephen (2009). However, tree DBH does not influence the number of red oak borer emergence holes (P = 0.21). If only the “medium” DBH trees (mean DBH = 34.5 cm, “medium”= 32–41 cm, n = 119) are analyzed, which comprise approximately one third of all trees surveyed, the effect of DBH on black carpenter ant presence is removed (P = 0.19) and black carpenter ants are still present on a significantly higher percent of trees with low numbers of red oak borer emergence holes (P = 0.004), confirming that this trend does not result from ant preference for tree sizes.

DISCUSSION

The discovery that red oak borer is less likely to be found in trees where black carpenter ants are present supports our research hypothesis. Black carpenter ants are more abundant in apparently healthy Class I and even Class II trees than apparently unhealthy Class III trees. There are several reasons why this trend may exist. Class I trees, having a more full crown, may provide more nutrients, moisture or a cooler foraging environment to the ants. However, the presence of black carpenter ants, no matter the reason for this association, may result in greater red oak borer egg predation.

Ito & Higashi (1991) found that oaks on which Formica ants tended aphids had higher fecundity than those on which ants were not present; they suggest that an indirect mutualism exists between ants and oaks via aphids. While black carpenter ants do not tend specific “herds” of aphids, they may depend on oaks for another vital resource—a nest site. While the relationship between oaks and carpenter ants remains largely unexamined, black carpenter ants are often reported to be found in the apparently “healthiest and largest” trees in the forest (pers. obs.).

Fig. 1.

Relationship between REP tree class and black carpenter ant presence. Mean percentages for classes followed by the same letter are not significantly different (F = 8.25, P = 0.0003). Data shown are not statistically transformed.

f01_304.eps

Though there is a body of literature suggesting that black carpenter ants are important predators of forest insect pests (Parmelee 1941; Allen et al. 1970; Smirnoff 1959; Youngs & Campbell 1984; Feicht & Acciavatti 1985; Galford 1985), we know of no direct tests of this hypothesis. This study was conducted after area-wide red oak borer populations had declined, and we have no knowledge of carpenter ant abundance and distribution previous to or during the red oak borer outbreak. As our data are correlative in nature, since direct assessments were impossible after the outbreak, it is impossible to draw firm conclusions about the role of black carpenter ants in population dynamics of red oak borer. Future studies should be aimed at understanding the general ecology of temperate ant species, their roles in pest insect predation and regulation and the factors which govern both ant and pest insect colonization of trees.

Fig. 2.

Relationship between black carpenter ant presence and within-tree red oak borer populations. Means classes with the same letter are not significantly different (F = 32.82, P < 0.001). Data shown are not statistically transformed.

f02_304.eps

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank T. J. Kring, L. C. Thompson and 2 anonymous reviewers for suggestions and improvements to the manuscript. We thank T. CarlLee, L. D. Galligan and M. McCall for assistance in field studies. This project was funded in part by the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, and by grants from the USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station and USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Special Technology Development, and Forest Health Monitoring Programs.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

D. C. Allen , F. B. Knight , and J. L. Foltz 1970. Invertebrate predators of the jack-pine budworm, Choristoneura pinus, in Michigan. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 63: 59–64. Google Scholar

2.

C. A. Cannon 1998. Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus (DeGeer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption [Dissertation]. Blacksburg, Virginia. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Google Scholar

3.

D. E. Donley 1978. Oviposition by the red oak borer, Enaphalodes rufulus Coleoptera: Cerambycidae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 71: 496–498. Google Scholar

4.

D. E. Donley , and R. E. Acciavatti 1980. Red Oak Borer. USDA Forest Service. Forest Insect and Disease Leaflet 163. 5 p. Google Scholar

5.

D. L. Feicht , and R. E. Acciavatti 1985. Pilot test of red oak borer silvicultural control in commercial forest stands, pp. 279–284 In Fifth Central Hardwood Forest Conference. Urbana, IL. Google Scholar

6.

M. K. Fierke , D. L. Kinney , V. B. Salisbury , D. J. Crook , and F. M. Stephen 2005a. A rapid estimation procedure for within-tree populations of red oak borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Forest Ecol. and Management 215: 163–168. Google Scholar

7.

M. K. Fierke , D. L. Kinney , V. B. Salisbury , D. J. Crook , and F. M. Stephen 2005b. Development and comparison of intensive and extensive sampling methods and preliminary within-tree population estimates of red oak borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas. Environ. Entomol. 34: 185–192. Google Scholar

8.

M. K. Fierke , M. B. Kelley , and F. M. Stephen 2007. Site and stand variables influencing red oak borer, Enaphalodes rufulus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), population densities and tree mortality. Forest Ecol. and Management 247: 227–236. Google Scholar

9.

J. R. Galford 1985. Role of Predators on an Artificially Planted Red Oak Borer Population. USDA Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. Research Note NE-331. 2 pp. Google Scholar

10.

C. J. Hay 1972. Woodpecker predation on red oak borer in black, scarlet, and northern red oak. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 65: 1421–1423. Google Scholar

11.

C. J. Hay 1974. Survival and mortality of red oak borer larvae on black, scarlet, and northern red oak in eastern Kentucky. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 67: 981–986. Google Scholar

12.

E. Heitzman 2003. Effects of oak decline on species composition in a northern Arkansas forest. Southern J. Applied Forestry 27: 264–268. Google Scholar

13.

F. Ito , and S. Higashi 1991. An indirect mutualism between oaks and wood ants via aphids. J. Animal Ecol. 60: 463–470. Google Scholar

14.

J. Kilpelainen , P. Punttila , L. Sundstrom , P. Niemela , and L. Finer 2005. Forest stand structure, site type and distribution of ant mounds in boreal forests in Finland in the 1950s. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42: 243–258. Google Scholar

15.

V. L. Muilenberg , F. L. Goggin , S. L. Hebert , L. Jia , and F. M. Stephen 2008. Ant predation on red oak borer confirmed by field observation and molecular gut-content analysis. Agric. and Forest Entomol. 10: 1–9. Google Scholar

16.

A. B. Nuss , D. R. Suiter , and G. W. Bennett 2005. Continuous monitoring of the black carpenter ant, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), trail behavior. Sociobiol. 45: 597–618. Google Scholar

17.

F. T. Parmelee 1941. Longhorned and flatheaded borers attacking fire-killed coniferous timber in Michigan. J. Econ. Entomol. 34: 377–380. Google Scholar

18.

J. J. Riggins 2008. Remote Sensing of Forest Decline and Enaphalodes rufulus Outbreak in the Arkansas Ozarks, U.S.A. PhD Dissertation. University of Arkansas. Fayetteville, Arkansas. 123 pp. Google Scholar

19.

SAS INSTITUTE. 2007. JMP Software: Version 7.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar

20.

W. A. Smirnoff 1959. Predators of Neodiprion swainei Midd. (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) larval vectors of virus diseases. Canadian Entomol. 91: 246–248. Google Scholar

21.

D. Starkey , S. Magini , F. Oliveria , S. Clarke , B. Bruce , R. Kertz , and R. Menard 2000. Forest Health evaluation of Oak Mortality and Decline on the Ozark National Forest, 1999. Forest Health Protection Report 2000-02-02. 31 pp. Google Scholar

22.

F. M. Stephen , V. B. Salisbury , and F. L. Oliveria 2001. Red oak borer, Enaphalodes rufulus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas, U.S.A.: An unexpected and remarkable forest disturbance. Integrated Pest Management Rev. 6: 247–252. Google Scholar

23.

USDA FOREST SERVICE. 1993. The Database Component of the Silvicultural Examination and Prescription Process as Documented in the Silvicultural Examination and Prescription Handbook. FSH 2409.26d, R8 Amendment 2409.26d-93-1. Appendix B. Continuous Inventory of Stand Conditions, CISC. 4 p. Google Scholar

24.

R. M. Verble , and F. M. Stephen 2009. Occurrence of carpenter ants in Ozark forests in relation to prescribed fire and stand variables. Southern J. Applied Forestry. In press.  Google Scholar

25.

V. L. Ware , and F. M. Stephen 2006. Facultative intraguild predation of red oak borer larvae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environ. Entomol. 35: 443–447. Google Scholar

26.

L. C. Youngs , and R. W. Campbell 1984. Ants preying on pupae of the western spruce budworm Choristoneura occidentalis (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in eastern Oregon and western Montana. Canadian Entomol. 116: 1665–1669. Google Scholar
R. M. Verble and F. M. Stephen "Occurrence of Camponotus pennsylvanicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Trees Previously Infested with Enaphalodes rufulus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas," Florida Entomologist 92(2), 304-308, (1 June 2009). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.092.0214
Published: 1 June 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top