Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2009 The Impact of Temperature on Biological Aspects and Life Table of Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Fed with Signal Grass
A. M. Auad, S. O. Alves, C. A. Carvalho, D. M. Silva, T. T. Resende, B. A. Veríssimo
Author Affiliations +

The impact of temperature was evaluated on Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Nymphs, 12-h-old, were placed individually in cylindrical plastic dishes (2.5 × 2.5 cm), with a layer of 1% agar in which leaf disks of signal grass had been placed. The nymphs were reared at 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32°C ± 1°C, RH of 70 ± 10% and 12-h photophase. We evaluated number of instars, duration of each instar and the nymphal period, survival of instars, duration of the reproductive period, daily and total production of nymphs, and longevity of the nymphal and adult phases. To construct the life expectancy table and fecundity, daily observations were made of 70 nymphs at each temperature, from birth to death. Development of R. padi was faster with increased temperature, but they did not complete the last nymphal instar at 32°C. The same pattern occurred for the pre-reproductive, reproductive, and post-reproductive periods. The highest fecundity rates were between 16°C and 24°C. The highest fertility (4 nymphs/female/day) was recorded at 12°C and 20°C. The highest net reproduction rates were at 24°C and 28°C, and the time interval between each generation (T) and the population doubling time (DT) diminished as temperature increased. The finite rate of increase (λ = 1.9 nymphs/female/day) and the intrinsic rate of increase (rm = 0.64) were greatest at 24°C and 28°C, respectively. There was a negative impact on the biology and life table of R. padi at 32°C, but the range of 12°C to 28°C, despite some fluctuations, was favorable for survival and reproduction.

Translation by the authors.

The quality of forage plants is one of the most important factors for reducing milk production costs. Signal grass (Brachiaria sp.), a perennial with large production of leaf mass, is widely grown in pastures in Brazil (Botrel et al. 1987). Various aphids in Brazil, including Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) vector viruses to grasses (Hutchinson & Bale 1994), and although R. padi is considered only an occasional pests on signal grass, at high population levels its can considerably reduce the quantity and quality of forage. Aphids in the genus Rhopalosiphum Koch, are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions (Blackman & Eastop 2000) and affect various crops of economic importance, such as sorghum, corn, sugarcane, oats, rye and barley (Robison 1992; Jauset et al. 1998). Hence, strategies to manage R. padi should be defined.

The effect of temperature on the biological aspects of R. padi on various host plants has been studied by Leather & Dixon (1984), Elliott & Kieckhefer (1989), De Barro et al. (1992), Hutchinson & Bale (1994), and Asin & Pons (2001), but there are no published studies of R. padi on signal grass. Knowledge in this respect will make it possible to predict the intensity of occurrence, to serve as a base for developing control strategies, and consequent improvement in management programs. In the present study we examined the effect of temperature on biology and development of R. padi and constructed a life table for R. padi fed with signal grass.


Biological Aspects of R. padi on Signal Grass

Adults of R. padi were collected on signal grass, Brachiaria ruziziensis (Germain & Everard), grown in greenhouses at the Embrapa Dairy Cattle Research Center in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The aphids were multiplied in the laboratory in Petri dishes kept in climate controlled chambers at a temperature of 24 ± 1°C, RH of 70 ± 10% and 12-h photophase. Nymphs up to 12-h age were collected with tweezers and placed individually in cylindrical plastic dishes (2.5 cm diameter and 2.5 cm height). Each dish was first filled with a solution of 1% agar in water to a height of 1.0 cm, in which leaf disks of signal grass were placed in order to keep the leaves turgid. The dishes were covered with fabric and secured with rubber bands.

The aphids were reared at temperatures of 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32°C ± 1°C, RH of 70 ± 10% and photophase of 12 h. Each treatment contained 150 nymphs in a fully randomized setup. The following parameters were evaluated: number of instars; duration of each instar and nymphal period; survival of the different instars; duration of the reproductive period; daily and total capacity to produce nymphs; and longevity of the nymphal and adult phases.

The data were submitted to variance analysis and the means were compared by the Scott Knott (1974) test at 5% significance. Data were submitted to regression analysis and the lower threshold temperatures (LTT) and development time in de-gree-days (DD) were estimated based on a hyperbolic relation, according to the method proposed by Bean (1961).

Life Table of R. padi on B. ruziziensis

Newly emerged R. padi nymphs were maintained individually in plastic dishes containing a layer of agar solution and leaf disk of signal grass, as described above. Nymphs were kept at temperatures of 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32°C, with 70 insects at each temperature. The insects were observed daily from birth to death to record the viability throughout their life cycle and to enable calculating the life tables at each temperature.

The life expectancy tables were based on the number of survivors at the start of age × (lx), number of individuals that died during interval × (dx), age structure (Ex), corresponding to the number of live individuals between one day and the next, life expectancy for individuals of age × (ex) and probability of death at age × (100qx), which indicates the probability of dying before the time established in ex. The following equations were used, as proposed by Silveira Neto et al. (1976): Ex=[Lx+(Lx+1)]/ 2; ex=Tx/Lx and 100 qx=(dx/lx).100.

For the fertility tables, the reproduction rates (Ro), time interval between generations (T), intrinsic rate of increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ), time necessary for the population to double (DT), means of the age interval (x), specific fertility (mx) and probability of survival (lx) were calculated, according to the following equations: Ro = Σ(mxlx); T = Σ(mx.lx.x)/ Σ(mxlx); rm= loge Ro/T = In Ro/T; λ = erm and DT = In(2)/rm.


Temperature influenced the duration of the instars and the nymphal cycle of R. padi, with increased rate of development as the temperature increased (Table 1, Fig. 1). These results agree with those reported by Elliott & Kieckhefer (1989) and Asin & Pons (2001) for the same aphid species. The last 2 instars at the highest temperature, 32°C, did not survive (Table 1). Asin & Pons (2001) found average survival of 55% of immatures of R. padi fed on corn at 30°C. According to Campbell et al. (1974), higher temperatures lead to greater mortality due to the denaturing of proteins or metabolic disturbances from the accumulation of toxic products, and these harmful effects mainly occur if the temperature is held constant.

The period in which R. padi remained in the immature phase was shortest at 28°C. This agrees with the findings of Asin & Pons (2001). However, Elliot & Kieckhefer (1989) and Dean (1974), using barley as food for R. padi, found that the maximum development rate occurred at 25°C. At 16 and 2°C, the insects remained in the nymphal stage longer than found by Segonca et al. (1994) at the same temperatures. Elliott & Kieckhefer (1989) also found a shorter nymphal cycle at similar temperatures to those studied here. These results suggest that the type of host plant offered as well as the geographic origin of the aphid can affect its development, even when kept under similar heat conditions. This is in line with the observations of Smith (1922).




Fig. 1.

Fitted regression curves for the duration of the first (A), second (B), third (C), fourth (D) instars, nymphal (E), and adult (F) phases of Rhopalosiphum padi, as a function of temperature.


The nymphal period of R. padi was on average 3 times longer at the lowest temperature (12°C) compared with the upper limit for survival (28°C). The effects of low temperature on the duration of R. padi were described by Hutchinson & Bale (1994), showing that sublethal stress affects the development process and longevity, which can exercise a dominant influence on the aphid's population dynamic. Asin & Pons (2001) also found that development increased with rising temperature. They reported complete development of the immature phase at 30°C, with a period significantly equal to that of the insects maintained at 27.5°C. These results also agree with the findings of Campbell & Mackauer (1975) that the average development time of aphids declines as temperature increases.

The lower threshold temperatures (LTT) for nymphs of R. padi are shown in Table 2. The insects were tolerant up to the limit of 28°C and the LTT increased as the insects reached the adult phase. Higher values were found by Elliott & Kieckhefer (1989) for the different instars (5.73 to 6.10 d) and nymphal phase (5.76 d), except for the fourth instar, when the temperature was the same as that found here. The numbers of degree-days (DD) required for the development of the different instars and the nymphal cycle were higher than those reported by Elliott & Kieckhefer (1989) for R. padi kept at temperatures from 11 to 29°C. With 3.38 as the lower temperature limit for development of the nymphal phase, 149.2 degreedays are required for this aphid species to reach the adult phase. These results are important to predict the number of annual generations of this insect.




The longest pre-reproductive and post-reproductive periods for R. padi maintained on B. ruziziensis were at the lowest temperature (12°C) and no significant differences were found in the range from 20°C to 28°C (Table 1). In this interval the adults began laying nymphs more quickly than at the other temperatures (Table 1 and Fig. 2). Elliott and Kieckhefer (1989) reported a shorter pre-reproductive period in the range from 15 to 26°C in relation to the extreme conditions of 11 and 29°C. Segonca et al. (1994) did not find any significant differences in the pre-reproductive period of R. padi in the range from 4 to 20°C. The values found by these authors were lower than those found in the present study.

The aphid's reproductive period was longest at 16°C, and there was no reduction in this biological parameter with increasing temperature (Table 1). Likewise, Segonca et al. (1994) did not find significant reductions in the duration of the reproductive period of R. padi submitted to temperatures from 8 to 20°C.

The highest fecundity rates occurred at 16 and 24°C, with 21.2 and 20.0 nymphs/female, respectively. Higher rates were found by Asin & Pons (2001) in the range from 18 to 27.5°C, varying from 35.2 to 45.0 nymphs/female, and a similar number of nymphs/female was found by Dean (1974) at 25°C. At 16 and 20°C, the average number of nymphs produced was 21.2 and 12.9, respectively. In contrast, Segonca et al. (1994) found twice as many nymphs produced when the aphids were reared at the same temperatures, indicating that the same aphid species, under the same climate conditions, can have different reproductive potentials, which are possibly influenced by other biotic or abiotic factors.

Hesler et al. (2005a) found production of 7.5 to 11.4 R. padi nymphs in a 24-h period when 3 winged females were reared at temperature of 20°C on transgenic wheat plants. The effect of the host plant on nymph production was also reported by Hesler (2005b), in which the same aphid species, during 7 d of observation, produced between 23.6 and 43.3 nymphs/female, according to the type of host grass. Nutritional factors are also responsible for variation in fecundity, as mentioned in the study by Adams (2007), in which an increase in nitrogen content was responsible for higher fecundity of R. padi.

The daily and total nymph production was lower at the extreme temperatures (12 and 28°C), as shown in Table 1. Asin & Pons (2001) also found a low reproductive capacity of R. padi when the females were reared at 30°C. According to Tang et al. (1999), aphids respond in different ways to adapt to different geographic regions and climate conditions. Nava-Camberos et al. (2001) added that besides temperature, the host plant also influences the aphid's physiological response. Therefore, the number of nymphs found in other studies possibly was higher than our findings because the R. padi aphids originated from other populations and were provided with host plants that permitted better development. However, Loeck et al. (2006) did not find significant differences in the reproduction of R. padi when testing different oat cultivars.

The survival of the various instars was above 70%, from 12 to 28°C, except at 20°C for the fourth instar (51%), indicating that in this temperature range the nymphs reach the adult phase. Third and fourth instars did not survive at the highest temperature (32°C), corroborating the results of Dean (1974), according to which 30°C was lethal to R. padi nymphs. However, Asin & Pons (2001) reported survival of 55% of this aphid species at this temperature. Tolerance of this aphid species to high temperatures was reported by De Barro et al. (1992), who mentioned that the initial mortality of this aphid was 32°C, and that above 39°C mortality was greater than 90%.

Fig. 2.

Fitted regression curves for the duration of pre-reproductive (A), reproductive (B), post-reproductive (C), and daily (D) and total (E) fertility of Rhopalosiphum padi, as a function of temperature.


Table of Life Expectancy and Fecundity of R. padi on Signal Grass

The survival (lx) started to diminish after the first day at a temperature of 12°C, as of 3.5 d at 16°C and from 1.5 d at the other temperatures (Fig. 3). These figures to not agree with those reported in the literature for other aphid species, probably because the insect's life expectancy is associated with the particular species (Tamaki et al. 1982) or host plant (Wale et al. 2000) being studied.

The highest life expectancies (ex) were 14.9, 14.3, 9.7, 10.3, 7.5 and 2.5 d in the nymph phase at 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32°C, respectively. In the adult phase, the longest life expectancies were 6.7, 10.8, 5.2, 6.2, and 4.7 days at 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28°C, respectively. At the highest temperature (32°C), life expectancy of nymphs was lowest, and the individuals died before reaching the adult phase.

Fig. 3.

Survivorship (Lx) and life expectancy (ex) of Rhopalosiphum padi as a function of temperature.


The probability of death before the period established (100 qx) occurred during the entire nymph and adult phase, with the majority of nil values for this parameter occurring at 16°C. The highest mortality rates (dx) were 10, 19, 9, 14, 13, and 23 dead individuals, and the probability of death (100qx) on these occasions was 71.4, 29.7, 45.0, 28.6, 18.6, and 40.4% at 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32°C, respectively.

The highest specific fecundity (mx = 4 nymphs/female/day) was recorded at 12 and 20°C. The aphids did not reach the adult phase at 32°C, which prevented calculating the fecundity table figures at this temperature. Likewise, Asin & Pons (2001) found a significant decline in the reproductive capacity of R. padi maintained at 30°C. The highest net reproduction rates (Ro) occurred at 24 and 28°C (Table 3). At 16 and 20°C, the Ro values were 9.92 and 9.85, respectively. Segonca et al. (1994), studying the same temperature conditions, found respective values of 46.6 and 38.0, indicating that the number of times R. padi increases in population from 1 generation to the next was nearly 5 times higher.




The time interval between each generation (T) diminished with increasing temperature (Table 3). A significant reduction in this interval was also found by Segonca et al. (1994) studying R. padi kept at 8 to 20°C.

The intrinsic rate of increase (rm) was higher at 28°C (0.64), indicating that at this temperature the population increases faster, while aphids kept at 12°C had a lower rm (0.09). These results corroborate those of Asin & Pons (2001) for R. padi, according to which the highest rate occurred at 27°C, considered to be the most suitable temperature for the species to develop. Segonca et al. (1994) found a gradual increase in rm from 8 to 20°C, and when compared to the results of the present study (16 and 20°C), the authors observed higher rm values. The same results occurred when R. padi individuals were exposed to temperatures fluctuating between 12.8 to 26.6°C or 20 to 33.4°C.

We found that rm was 4 times higher when the temperature increased from 16 to 28°C. Asin & Pons (2001) found that in the range of 18 to 27°C, rm of this aphid doubled at the highest temperature, suggesting the ability of this species to adapt to higher temperatures. The finite rate of increase was higher at 28°C, at 1.9 nymphs/female/day. The population doubling times (DT) were 8.06 and 1.08 days at 12 and 28°C, respectively.

The results show that with higher temperatures, up to a limit of 28°C, although the life expectancy of R. padi fed with signal grass is lower, the aphid's fecundity is higher when compared to lower temperatures, explaining population spikes at certain times of the year. These findings can assist in planning control measures. In conclusion, in the range of 12 to 28 °C, nymphs reached the adult phase, and 16 to 24°C was the most favorable temperature range for reproduction of R. padi on B. ruziziensis. The life expectancy of R. padi decreased with increasing temperature, but fecundity was best at 28°C.



V. T. Adams 2007. Fecundity of the Aphid Rhopalosiphum padi on Selected Oregon Grasses. 19f. Thesis (Baccalaureate)—Oregon State University, USA. Google Scholar


L. Asin , and X. Pons 2001. Effect of high temperature on the growth and reproduction of corn aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) and implications for their population dynamics on the Northeastern Iberian Peninsula. Environ. Entomol. 30: 1127–1134. Google Scholar


J. L. Bean 1961. Predicting emergence of second-instar spruce budworm larvae from hibernation under field conditions in Minnesota. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 54: 175–177. Google Scholar


R. L Blackman , and V. F. Eastop 2000. Aphids on the Worlds Crops: An Identification and Information Guide, 2nd ed. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 466p. Google Scholar


M. A Botrel , M. J. E. Alvim , and O. L. Mozzer 1987. Avaliação agronômica de gramíneas forrageiras sob pastejo. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 22: 1019–1025. Google Scholar


A. Campbell , B. D. Frazer , N. Gilbert , A. P. Gutierrez , and M. MacKauer 1974. Temperature requirements of some aphids and their parasites. J. App. Ecol. 11: 431–438. Google Scholar


A. Campbell , and M. MacKauer 1975. Thermal constants for development of the pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its parasites. Can. Entomol. 107: 4119–423. Google Scholar


P. J. De Barro , D. A. Maelzer , and H. Wallwork 1992. The role of refuge areas in the phenology of Rhopalosiphum padi in the low rainfall wheat belt of South Australia. Ann. App. Biol. 21: 521–535. Google Scholar


G. J. Dean 1974. Effect of temperature on the cereal aphids Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker), Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) and Macrosiphum avenue (F.) (Hem., Aphididae). Bul. Entomol. Res. 63: 401–409. Google Scholar


N. C. Elliott , and R. W. Kieckhefer 1989. Effects of constant and fluctuating temperatures on immature development and age-specific life tables of Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. Entomol. 21: 131–140. Google Scholar


L. S. Hesler 2005b. Resistance to Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) in three triticale accession. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 603–610. Google Scholar


L. S. Hesler , T. M. Cheesbrough , and W. E. Riedell 2005a. Nymphiposition and population growth of Rhopalosiphum padi L. (Homoptera: Aphididae) on conventional wheat cultivars and transgenic wheat isolines. J. Entomol. Sci. 40: 186–196. Google Scholar


L. A. Hutchinson , and J. S. Bale 1994. Effects of sublethal cold stress on the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. J. App. Ecol. 31: 102–108. Google Scholar


A. M. Jauset , M. P. Munoz , and X. Pons 1998. Karyotypes of Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) in the Lleida Basin. Integrated Control in Cereal Crops. 21: 15–20. Google Scholar


S. R. Leather , and A. F. G. Dixon 1984. Aphid growth and reproductive rates. Entomol. Exper. Applic. 35: 137–140. Google Scholar


A. E. Loeck , F. P. Giolo , C. G. Manzoni , R. S. Borba , R. Azevedo , and E. D. Centenaro 2006. Reprodução dos pulgães Rhopalosiphum paid (Linnaeus, 1758) e Schizaphis graminum (Rondani, 1852) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) em cultivares de aveia branca. Rev. Brasil. Agrociência. 12: 237–240. Google Scholar


U. Nava-Camberos , D. G. Riley , and M. K. Harris 2001. Temperature and host plant effects on development, survival and fecundity of Bemisia argenti-folii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environ. Entomol. 30: 55–63. Google Scholar


J. Robinson 1992. Modes of resistance in barley seedlings to six aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) species. J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 2510–2515. Google Scholar


A. J. Scott , and M. A. Knott 1974. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics. 30: 507–512, 1974. Google Scholar


V. C. Segonca , A. Hoffmann , and B. Kleinhenz 1994. Investigations on development, survival and fertility of the cereal aphids Sitobion auenae (F.) and Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Homoptera: Aphididae) at different low temperatures. J. App. Entomol. 117: 224–233. Google Scholar


S. Silveira Neto , O. Nakano , D. Barbin , and N. Villa Nova 1976. Manual de ecologia dos insetos, 419p. São Paulo: Agronômica Ceres. Google Scholar


R. C. Smith 1922. A study of the biology of the Chrysopidae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 14: 27–35. Google Scholar


G. Tamaki , B. Annis , L. Fox , R. K. Gupta , and A. Meszleny 1982. Comparison of yellow holocyclic and green anholocyclic strains of Myzus persicae (Sulzer): low temperature adaptability. Environ. Entomol. 11: 231–233. Google Scholar


Y. Q. Tang , S. L. Lapointe , L. G. Brown , and W. B. Hunter 1999. Effects of host plant and temperature on the biology of Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 28: 895– 900. Google Scholar


M. Wale , J. Bekele , and S. Emiru 2000. Biology of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on cool-season legumes. J. Insect Sci. and Its Application 20: 171–180. Google Scholar
A. M. Auad, S. O. Alves, C. A. Carvalho, D. M. Silva, T. T. Resende, and B. A. Veríssimo "The Impact of Temperature on Biological Aspects and Life Table of Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Fed with Signal Grass," Florida Entomologist 92(4), 569-577, (1 December 2009).
Published: 1 December 2009
signal grass
Back to Top