Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2010 Diversity and Abundance of Hymenopterous Parasitoids Associated with Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Native and Exotic Host Plants in Misiones, Northeastern Argentina
Pablo Schliserman, Sergio M. Ovruski, Olga R. de Coll, Robert Wharton
Author Affiliations +

Some Major host species used by the tephritid fruit flies Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), including Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret, Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg, Psidium guajava L., Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl., Citrus reticulata Blanco var. Murcott, C. aurantium L., C. paradisi Macfadyen var. Dalan Dan, and C. paradisi var. Sudashi, were sampled for fruit fly larvae between Feb and Dec 2000 in the northernmost section of the Paranaense forest, in the Province of Misiones, NE Argentina. Both A. fraterculus and C. capitata were obtained from these host plant species, with A. fraterculus accounting for 93% of all tephritid puparia identified. Ten species of larval-pupal parasitoids were recovered from A. fraterculus: Doryctobracon areolatus (Szépligeti), D. brasiliensis (Szépligeti), Utetes anastrephae (Viereck), Opius bellus (Gahan), Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Opiinae, Braconidae), Odontosema anastrephae Borgmeier, Lopheucoila anastrephae (Rohwer), Aganaspis pelleranoi (Brèthes) (Eucoilinae, Figitidae), Asobara anastrephae (Muessebeck) (Alyssinae, Braconidae), and Aceratoneuromyia indica (Silvestri) (Tetrastichinae, Eulophidae). All these parasitoids, with the exception of D. longicaudata and A. indica, are native to the Neotropical region. No parasitoids were recovered from C. capitata puparia. Asobara anastrephae and O. anastrephae are newly recorded in Argentina, whereas D. brasiliensis, U. anastrephae, and L. anastrephae are newly reported in Misiones. The eucoiline A. pelleranoi was the most abundant parasitoid species. Acca sellowiana and P. guajava harbored the highest parasitoid abundance and diversity.

There are 2 tephritid fly species in Argentina that have a major economic impact: the native Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (South American fruit fly) and the exotic Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Mediterranean fruit fly). These pests represent an obstacle for fruit crop expansion and for diversification plans in the northeastern Argentinean provinces of Misiones, Corrientes and Entre Ríos (Guillén & Sánchez 2007). In this Argentinean region there are important Citrus-growing areas and patches of native forest locally known as the “Selva Paranaense” (Cabrera 1976), where A. fraterculus and C. capitata infest both wild and cultivated native and exotic fruit species (Turica & Mallo 1961; Putruelle 1996; Segura et al. 2006).

Ogloblin (1937) and Turica & Mallo (1961) are the only previous studies of the native parasitoid fauna of A. fraterculus in the northernmost extension of the Argentinean Paranaense forest. Since then, the exotic fruit fly parasitoids, Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) and Aceratoneuromyia indica (Silvestri), were recovered from A. fraterculus pupae in Misiones (Schliserman et al. 2003; Ovruski et al. 2006). Both D. longicaudata and A. indica, natives of Southeast Asia, were introduced during the 1960s and released in limited numbers in several fruit-growing areas of Argentina, including Misiones (Ovruski et al. 2000), and these are the only exotic parasitoids currently established in Argentina.

The aim of the present study is to survey wild and cultivated fruit species commonly infested by A. fraterculus and C. capitata with the purpose of providing more detailed information on the diversity, abundance, and distribution ranges of hymenopterous parasitoid species associated with both tephritid species in Misiones, northeastern Argentina, as well as to record the degree of infestation and parasitism in each fruit species.





Fruit collections were made weekly between Feb and Dec 2000 in Caraguatay (26°66′S, 54°75′W, elevation 193 m), Laharrague (26°50′S, 54°77′W, 159 m), and Montecarlo city (26°57′S, 54°45′W, 161 m) localities of the Misiones province, NE Argentina. The region has a temperatewarm humid climate with a summer average temperature of 25°C, and a winter average temperature of 16°C. It rains periodically all year long, and the annual rainfall varies from 1,500 to 2,500 mm (Anonymous 1992). The original native vegetation is the subtropical rainforest locally known as the “Selva Paranaense”, which has been intensely modified into agricultural and managed forest areas (Cabrera 1976).

The fruit samples consisted of fallen ripe fruit (40–50%) and ripe fruit still on the tree (50–60%). Table 1 contains fruit tree species surveyed, with information on mean individual weight of fruit, status (exotic or native and wild or cultivated), common name, and plant family. Fruit were mainly collected in forest patches adjacent to citrus groves covered with wild native vegetation, and orchards located at the experimental station “Campo Experimental Laharrague”, an agricultural area maintained by the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, INTA). No insecticides were applied in any of the collection sites.

Fruit samples were processed in the laboratory of the Montecarlo Experimental Agricultural Station (Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Montecarlo, EEAM)—INTA located in Montecarlo city. Fruits collected from tree and from the ground were kept separate. All fruits in the sample were weighed and rinsed with a 20% solution of sodium benzoate. Each sample was placed in a plastic tray (55 × 40 × 20 cm) with sand in the bottorn as pupation medium for larvae. All trays were kept inside a room at 26 ± 2°C and 65 ± 10% relative humidity for 4 weeks. Afterwards, fruits were dissected to find larvae or puparia in the pulp. Live larvae were allowed to pupate and were then added to the other pupae collected from the same sample. The sand inside trays was sifted 2 times each week to collect tephritid pupae, which then were transferred to glass vials (11 cm high and 6 cm of diameter) containing sterilized humid sand at the bottom. Puparia of C. capitata and Anastrepha Schiner were separated based on pupal characters (White & Elson-Harris 1992).

Parasitoid specimens were identified to species by the authors P. S, S. O., and R. W. Fruit flies were identified by S. O. using Zucchi's (2000) taxonomic key. The nomenclature corresponds to Wharton (1997) for the Opiinae and Wharton et al. (1998) for the Eucoilinae. Parasitoid and fly specimens were placed in the entomological collections of the Miguel Lillo Foundation (Fundación Miguel Lillo, FML) (Tucumán, Argentina), EEAM (Misiones, Argentina), and Texas A&M University (Texas, USA). All plant species were identified by author O. De Coll.

The rate of parasitism was calculated by dividing the total number of adult parasitoids emerging from pupae obtained from a fruit sample by the total number of pupae recovered from that 1 fruit sample and multiplying it by 100 (Aluja et al. 2003). Fruit infestation levels were obtained by dividing the total number of pupae obtained from a fruit sample by the total weight of the sample (Aluja et al. 2003).


A total of 261.35 kg of fruit was processed during this study (Table 2). Only A. fraterculus was recovered from P. guajava, A. sellowiana, E. japonica, and C. xanthocarpa, whereas both A. fraterculus and C. capitata were recovered from the remaining fruit species. Ceratitis capitata constituted 93, 38, 15, 20, and 25% of the total recovered fly puparia from C. aurantium, C. reticulata, C. paradisi var. Dalan Dan, C. paradisi var Sudashi, and P. persica (Table 2).

The highest infestation rates by A. fraterculus were found in P. guajava and A. sellowiana, and the lowest levels in the Citrus species (Table 2). Infestation patterns by C. capitata were low and ranged from 0 to 14 pupae per kg of sampled fruit (Table 2).

Five species of opiine Braconidae, 3 species of eucoiline Figitidae, 1 species of alysiine Braconidae, and 1 species of tetrastichine Eulophidae, all larval-pupal parasitoids, were recovered from A. fraterculus pupae. The parasitoids comprised Doryctobracon areolatus (Szépligeti), D. brasiliensis (Szépligeti), Utetes anastrephae (Viereck), Opius bellus Gahan, Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Opiinae, Braconidae), Odontosema anastrephae Borgmeier, Lopheucoila anastrephae (Rohwer), Aganaspis pelleranoi (Brèthes) (Eucoilinae, Figitidae), Asobara anastrephae (Muessebeck) (Alyssinae, Braconidae), and Aceratoneuromyia indica (Silvestri) (Tetrastichinae, Eulophidae). All these parasitoid species, with the exception of D. longicaudata and A. indica, are native to the Neotropical region. No parasitoids were recovered from C. capitata puparia.

Nine parasitoid species were found attacking A. fraterculus larvae in A. sellowiana, which had the most diverse assemblage of parasitoids (Table 3). In 3 of the fruit species, only a single parasitoid species was associated with A. fraterculus larvae (Table 3). Nearly 80% of the figitid parasitoids were recovered from fruit gathered from the ground. On the contrary, approximately 60% of the braconid parasitoids were obtained from fruit collected from the tree canopy (Table 3). Percent parasitism was variable and ranged from 0 to 15% in the different fruit species found to be hosts of A. fraterculus in the study area (Fig. 1).


Six findings are noteworthy: (1) a higher proportion of A. fraterculus than C. capitata were found in 90% of the host plants surveyed, (2) the diversity of native A. fraterculus parasitoids was high in the northernmost section of the subtropical Paranaense forest, (3) the new data extended the known distribution of A. fraterculus parasitoids, (4) the permanent establishment of A. indica in the Paranaense biogeographical region was confirmed, (5) the eucoiline A. pelleranoi was relatively abundant and had an uncharacteristically wide host plant breadth, and (6) the importance of host plants of the Myrtaceae family, such as the A. sellowiana and P. guajava, harbored unusually high levels of parasitoid diversity and abundance.

Although the number and size of fruit samples surveyed during this study were relatively small, the data suggest that A. fraterculus appears to be more abundant than C. capitata in wild native, “feral” exotic, and cultivated exotic fruit species, with the sole exception of C. aurantium, in the northernmost portion of NE Argentina. Both A. sellowiana and P. guajava wild fruit species were principal reservoirs from which A. fraterculus could spread to Ciirus-growing areas. Similar observations have been made by Ovruski et al. (2004, 2005) in NW Argentina. As noted by Norrbom (2000), fruits in the family Myrtaceae are the principal hosts of A. fraterculus.

The alysiine A. anastrephae and the eucoiline O. anastrephae are 2 new native A. fraterculus parasitoid species recorded for Argentina. Before this study, 11 neotropical parasitoid species associated with A. fraterculus on native and exotic host fruit species had been found in Argentina (5 Braconidae, 4 Figitidae, and 2 Diapriidae) (Ovruski et al. 2005). In decades old studies, D. areolatus, O. bellus, and A. pelleranoi were the only native parasitoid species recovered from A. fraterculus in Misiones (Ogloblin 1937, Turica & Mallo 1961).







Fig. 1.

Mean (± SD) parasitism percentage recorded in 7 host fruit species of A. fraterculus collected in Misiones, NE Argentina.


The present detection of Asobara anastrephae represents the southernmost collection of this species. It was previously reported in association with Anastrepha spp. in Panama, Colombia, and Brazil (São Paulo, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Norte, Goiás, and Amazonas states) (Ovruski et al. 2000; Canal & Zucchi 2000; Souza Filho et al. 2009). Previous to this study, Odontosema anastrephae had only been recorded from Anastrepha spp. in Brazil, Costa Rica, and México (Guimarães et al. 2003). Possibly, O. anastrephae is widespread throughout the Neotropical Region (Wharton et al. 1998).

This study also corroborates the permanent establishment of the exotic parasitoid species A. indica on A. fraterculus in northeastern Argentina. Previously, A. indica had only been recorded from A. fraterculus pupae obtained from guava fruits approximately 38 years after its first release in Misiones (Ovruski et al. 2006). The specimens of D. longicaudata recorded in this study had been previously cited by Schliserman et al. (2003) and their collection marks a new southern limit for their distribution (26°50′S, 54°77′W). This exotic opiine species also had been found at 23°06′S latitude and 64°24′W longitude in the NW Argentina (Orono & Ovruski 2007).

Of all larval-pupal/prepupal parasitoids collected, A. pelleranoi and D. areolatus were the most abundant. This pattern has also been reported in similar surveys carried out in NW Argentina (Ovruski et al. 2004, 2005) and in the southern portion of NE Argentina (Ovruski & Schliserman 2003; Ovruski et al. 2007). In all those studies D. areolatus represented between 48 and 61% of the total number of specimens identified, while the A. pelleranoi ranged between 14 and 28%. By contrast, in the present study 48% of 605 parasitoids recovered were A. pelleranoi.

Both D. areolatus and A. pelleranoi frequently have been recovered from several wild, exotic, and native fruit species in Latin America (Aluja 1999; Sivinski et al. 2000; Ovruski et al. 2000; Souza-Filho et al. 2009). In the present study the only parasitoid species found in association with large-sized, introduced fruit species, such as Citrus paradisi and C. reticulata, was A. pelleranoi. This information is consistent with data published by Schliserman & Ovruski (2004) who collected 2,820 C. aurantium fruits in NW Argentina but recovered A. pelleranoi as the only parasitoid. Previous studies by Sivinski et al. (1997) in Mexico and Ovruski et al. (2004) in Argentina showed that A. pelleranoi mostly parasitized Anastrepha larvae in fallen fruit by entering through fissures in the fruit. Large fruits with a thick pericarp allows A. pelleranoi to exploit a larval resource that is unavailable to species such as D. areolatus, which forages at canopy level (García-Medel et al. 2007) and always oviposits by drilling through the pericarp from the outside of the fruit (Sivinski & Aluja 2003). Data reported in Table 3 corroborated the differences in the foraging patterns between the figitid A. pelleranoi and the opiines D. areolatus and D. brasiliensis. In the cases of the other parasitoid species identified in this study, the total number of adults recovered were quite low (Table 3), and no definitive conclusions can be achieved. However, previous reports by Sivinski et al. (1997), López et al. (1999), and GarcíaMedel et al. (2007) indicated that O. anastrephae preferentially attacks larvae in fallen fruit upon the ground, U. anastrephae forages at canopy level, and D. longicaudata can parasitized larvae at ground level, and also in the canopy.

Two members of the family Myrtaceae, A. sellowiana and P. guajava, generated 87% of all parasitoid specimens recovered from A. fraterculus pupae, and showed the highest diversity values. Similar studies conducted in tropical and subtropical forests of México (López et al. 1999; Sivinski et al. 2000), Brazil (Aguiar Menezes et al. 2001; Souza-Filho et al. 2009), NW Argentina (Ovruski et al. 2004, 2005) and Bolivia (Ovruski et al. 2009) highlighted the importance of wild or “feral” Psidium species and other native Myrtaceae species as reservoirs for native Anastrepha parasitoids. In general, Myrtaceae fruits have several characteristics, such as thin pericarp, soft endocarp, volatiles, color, and size that may favor parasitoid success, either by increasing attractiveness to wasps or by establishing easier host larva detection (Sivinski et al. 1997; Ovruski et al. 2000). Our samples of C. xanthocarpa, however, suggest that not all myrtaceans are equally attractive. Our data point to the need for more thorough monitoring of fruit fly host plants over several years to assess seasonal and annual variation in impact of parasitoids upon natural populations of C. capitata and A. fraterculus in NE Argentina.


We express our gratitude to German E. Tietjen (INTA-EEA Montecarlo, Argentina) for valuable technical support. P. S. and S. O thank Martin Aluja (INECOL, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México) for sharing with us his vast experience on ecology, biology, and ethology of fruit fly parasitoids. We thank 2 anonymous reviewers for helping us produce a better manuscript. Financial support was provided by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina (CONICET) (Grant PIP Nos. 5129/05 and 112-200801-01353/2008) and Institute Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria—Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Montecarlo, Misiones, Argentina.



E. L. Aguiar-Menezes , E. B. Menezes , P. S. Silva , A. C. Bittar , and P. C. R. Cassino 2001. Native Hymenoptera parasitoids associated with Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Seropedica city, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Florida Entomol. 84(84): 706– 711. Google Scholar


M. Aluja 1999. Fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) research in Latin America: myths, realities and dreams. Anais Soc. Entomol. Brasil 28: 565–594. Google Scholar


M. Aluja , J. Rull , J. Sivinski , A. L. Norrbom , R. Wharton , R. Macías-Ordoñez , F. Díaz-Fleischer , and M. López 2003. Fruit flies of the genus Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) and associated native parasitoids (Hymenoptera) in the tropical rainforest biosphere reserve of Montes Azules, Chiapas, México. Environ. Entomol. 32: 1377–1385. Google Scholar


ANONYMOUS. 1992. Atlas de la República Argentina. Editorial El Ateneo, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Google Scholar


A. Cabrera 1976. Regiones fitogeográficas argentines. Enciclopedia Agriculture y Jardinería. Ediciones ACME, SACI, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 135 pp. Google Scholar


N. A. Canal , and R. A. Zucchi 2000. Parasitóides— Braconidae, pp. 119–126 In A. Malavasi and R. A. Zucchi [eds.], Moscas-das-frutas de Importância Econômica no Brasil. Conhecimento Básico e Aplicado. Holos Editera, Riberão Prete, Brasil. Google Scholar


D. García-Medel , J. Sivinski , F. Diaz-Fleischer , R. Ramirez-Romero , and M. Aluja 2007. Foraging behavior by six fruit fly parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) released as single- or multiple-species cohorts in field cages: influence of fruit location and host density. Biol. Control 43: 12–22. Google Scholar


D Guillén , and R. Sánchez 2007. Expansion of the national fruit fly control programme in Argentina, pp. 653–660 In M. J. B. Vreysen , A. S. Robinson and J. Hendrichs [eds.], Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests: From Research To Field Implementation. Springer, The Netherlands. Google Scholar


J. A. Guimarães , F. E. Gallardo , N. B. Diaz , and R. A. Zucchi 2003. Eucoilinae species (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae) parasitoids of fruit-infesting dipterous larvae in Brazil: identity, geographical distribution and host associations. Zootaxa 278: 1–23. Google Scholar


M. López , M. Aluja , and J. Sivinski 1999. Hymenopterous larval-pupal and pupal parasitoids of Anastrepha flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico. Biol. Control 15: 119–129. Google Scholar


P. Montoya , P. Liedo , B. Benrey , J. Cancino , J. F. Barrera , J. Sivinski , and M. Aluja 2000. Biological Control of Anastrepha spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) in mango orchards through augmentative releases of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biol. Control 18: 216–224. Google Scholar


A. L. Norrbom 2004. Host plant database for Anastrepha and Toxotrypana (Diptera: Tephritidae: Toxotrypani). Diptera Data Dissemination Disk 2, USDA-APHIS. Google Scholar


A. Ogloblin 1937. La protectión de los enemigos naturales de la mosca de la fruta (Anastrepha fraterculus). Almanaque Min. Agric. 3: 177–179. Google Scholar


L. E. Oroño , and S. M. Ovruski 2007. Presence of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in a guiad of parasitoids attacking Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in northwestern Argentina. Florida Entomol. 90(2): 410–412. Google Scholar


S. M. Ovruski , and P. Schliserman 2003. Opiine and eucoiline parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Figitidae) of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the citrus orchard areas in Corrientes, northeastern Argentina. Canadian Entomol. 135(6): 863–865. Google Scholar


S. M. Ovruski , P. Schliserman , and M. Aluja 2004. Indigenous parasitoids (Hymenoptera) attacking Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in native and exotic host plants in Northwestern Argentina. Biol. Control 29: 43–57. Google Scholar


S. M. Ovruski , M. Aluja , J. Sivinski , and R. A. Wharton 2000. Hymenopteran parasitoids on fruit—infesting tephritidae (Diptera) in Latin America and the southern United States: diversity, distribution, taxonomic status and their use in fruit fly biological control. Int. Pest Management Reviews 5: 81–107. Google Scholar


S. M. Ovruski , R. A. Wharton , P. Schliserman , and M. Aluja 2005. Abundance of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) and its associated native parasitoids (Hymenoptera) in “feral” guavas growing in the endangered northernmost Yungas forests of Argentina with an update on the taxonomic status of Opiine parasitoids previously reported in this country. Environ. Entomol. 34(4): 807–818. Google Scholar


S. M. Ovruski , P. Schliserman , O. R. Decoll , C. Peñaloza , L. Oroño , and C. Colin 2006. The establishment of Aceratoneuromyia indica (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in three biogeographical regions of Argentina. Florida Entomol. 89(2): 270–273. Google Scholar


S. M. Ovruski , P. Schliserman , L. E. Oroño , S. R. Núñez-Campero , P. Albornoz-Medina , L. P. Bezdjian , and G. A. Van Nieuwenhove 2008. Natural occurrence of hymenopterous parasitoids associated with Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Myrtaceae species in Entre Rios, Northeastern Argentina. Florida Entomol. 91(2): 220–227. Google Scholar


S. M. Ovruski , P. Schliserman , S. R. Nuñéz-Campero , L. E. Oroño , L. P. Bezdjian , P. Albornoz-Medina , and G. A. Van Nieuwenhove 2009. A survey of hymenopterous larval-pupal parasitoids associated with Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting wild guava (Psidium guajava) and peach (Prunus persica) in the southernmost section of the bolivian Yungas forest. Florida Entomol. 92 (2): 269–275. Google Scholar


M. T. G. Putruele 1996. Hosts for Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus in the Northeastern province of Entre Ríos, Argentina, pp. 343–345 In B. A. McPheron and G. J. Steck , [eds.], Fruit Fly Pests: A World Assessment of Their Biology and Management. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida. Google Scholar


P. Schliserman , S. M. Ovruski , and O. R. Decoll 2003. The recovery and permanent establishment of Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Misiones, northeastern Argentina. Florida Entomol. 86(4): 491–492. Google Scholar


P. Schliserman , and S. M. Ovruski 2004. Incidencia de moscas de la fruta de importancia económica sobre Citrus aurantium (Rutaceae) en Tucumán, Argentina. Rev. Manejo Integr. Piagas y Agroecología (Costa Rica) 72: 52–61. Google Scholar


D. F. Segura , M. T. Vera , C. L. Cagnotti , N. Vaccaro , O. R. Decoll , S. M. Ovruski , and J. L. Cladera 2006. Relative abundance of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in diverse host species and localities of Argentina. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 99(1): 70–83. Google Scholar


J. Sivinski , and M. Aluja . 2003. The evolution of ovipositor length in the parasitic Hymenoptera and the search for predictability in biological control. Florida Emtomol. 86(2): 143–150. Google Scholar


J. Sivinski , M. Aluja , and M. López 1997. The spatial and temporal distributions of parasitoids of Mexican Anastrepha species (Diptera: Tephritidae) within the canopies of fruit trees. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 90: 604–618. Google Scholar


J. Sivinski , J. Pinero , and M. Aluja 2000. The distributions of parasitoids (Hymenoptera) of Anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) along an altitudinal gradient in Veracruz, Mexico. Biol. Control 18: 258– 269. Google Scholar


M. F. Souza-Filho , A. Raga , J. A. Azevedo-Filho , P. C. Strikis , J. A. Guimarães , and R. A. Zucchi 2009. Diversity and seasonality of fruit flies (Díptera: Tephritidae and Lonchaeidae) and their parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae and Figitidae) in orchards of guava, loquat and peach. Brazilian J. Biol. 69(1): 31–40. Google Scholar


A. Turica , and R. G. Mallo 1961. Observaciones sobre la población de las “Tephritidae” y sus endoparásitos en algunas regiones citrícolas argentinas. Rev. IDIA (Argentina), Supl. 6: 145–161. Google Scholar


R. A. Wharton 1997. Generic relationships of opiine braconidae (Hymenoptera) parasitic on fruit-infesting Tephritidae (Diptera). Contributions American Entomol. Institute 30: 1–53. Google Scholar


R. A. Wharton , S. M. Ovruski , and F. E. Gilstrap 1998. Neotropical Eucoilidae (Cynipoidea) associated with fruit infesting Tephritidae, with new records from Argentina, Bolivia and Costa Rica. J. Hym. Res. 7: 102–115. Google Scholar


I. M. White , and M. M. Elson-Harris 1992. Fruit Flies Of Economic Significance: Their Identification and Bionomics. CAB international, ACIAR, Redwood Press Ltd., Melksham, UK, 601 pp. Google Scholar


R. A. Zucchi 2000. Taxonomía. pp. 13–24 In A. Malavasi and R. A. Zucchi [eds.], Moscas-das-frutas de Importância Econâmica no Brasil: Conhecimento Básico e Aplicado. Holos Editora, Riberão Preto, Brasil. Google Scholar
Pablo Schliserman, Sergio M. Ovruski, Olga R. de Coll, and Robert Wharton "Diversity and Abundance of Hymenopterous Parasitoids Associated with Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Native and Exotic Host Plants in Misiones, Northeastern Argentina," Florida Entomologist 93(2), 175-182, (1 June 2010).
Published: 1 June 2010
fruit flies
host plants
Back to Top