Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2011 Distribution of Pseudacteon curvatus and Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera: Phoridae) in Arkansas
Jake M. Farnum, Kelly M. Loftin
Author Affiliations +

From 1995 to 2009, four Pseudacteon species were released in the U.S. with 3 species, P. curvatus, P. tricuspis, and P. obtusus released in Arkansas. To determine Pseudacteon establishment and expansion, sticky traps were used to monitor phorid fly species at and near 10 release sites, in counties bordering neighboring states, and along regional transects. Pseudacteon flies were captured in 16 Arkansas counties: Ashley, Chicot, Clark, Desha, Drew, Hempstead, Howard, Little River, Montgomery, Nevada, Perry, Phillips, Pike, Polk, Sevier, and Union. Pseudacteon curvatus was found in areas far from release sites, suggesting dispersal from neighboring states. The range of P. tricuspis evidently also expanded from its initial release sites in southern Arkansas.

Pseudacteon phorid flies parasitize and kill their fire ant host (Solenopsis invicta Buren, S. richteri Forel and their hybrid). Due to their high host specificity (Folgarait et al. 2002; Gilbert & Morrison 1997; Morrison & Gilbert 1999; Porter 1998a, 2000; Porter & Alonso 1999; Porter & Gilbert 2004; Vazquez et al. 2004), several Pseudacteon spp. have been introduced from South America as classical biological control agents against imported fire ants. While internal development of the fly larvae eventually decapitates and kills individual ants (Porter et al. 1995a; Consoli et al. 2001), perhaps the most important effect is the disruption of the foraging behavior of the ants (Feener & Brown 1992; Orr et al. 1995; Porter et al. 1995b; Mehdiabadi & Gilbert 2002), which leads to a decrease in food uptake and a decline in colony health (Folgarait & Gilbert 1999). Four Pseudacteon species were released in the U.S. from 1995 to 2009: P. curvatus Borgmeier, P. litoralis Borgmeier, P. obtusus Borgmeier, and P. tricuspis Borgmeier. Each species fills a different niche, in terms of diurnal activity (Pesquero et al. 1996), seasonal occurrence (Fowler et al. 1995; Folgarait et al. 2003) and preferred size of host (Campiolo et al. 1994); all complementing traits for control of S. invicta and S. richteri (Morrison et al. 1997; Porter 2000; Folgarait et al. 2002, 2005).

Pseudacteon flies use semiochemicals to locate their ant hosts (Orr et al. 1997; Vander Meer & Porter 2002; Morrison & King 2004; Chen & Fadamiro 2007) and then hover over the ants before a rapid aerial attack (Morrison & Porter 2005). Within a period of an hour a female fly can make up to 120 oviposition attempts (Morrison et al. 1997), before either tiring or being captured and killed by the ants (Porter 1998b). A single egg laid in the thorax develops through 3 instars before decapitating the ant's head, which is then used as a pupal case (Pesquero et al. 1995; Porter et al. 1995a).

The first release of P. tricuspis occurred in Texas in 1995 (Gilbert 1996), and was unsuccessful due to unfavorable conditions (Vazquez et al. 2006). The first successful release of P. tricuspis in northern Florida was in 1997 (Porter et al. 1999). Pseudacteon spp. have been released in 11 southern states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas (Porter et al. 1999; Graham et al. 2003; Williams & deShazo 2004; Parkman et al. 2005; Thead et al. 2005; Henne et al. 2007; Weeks & Callcott 2008). Pseudacteon curvatus, P. obtusus, and P. tricuspis have been released in Arkansas and in adjacent states except Missouri (Clemons et al. 2003; Weeks & Callcott 2008).

Dispersal rates for Pseudacteon spp. are variable and the majority of flies disperse only a few hundred meters (Morrison et al. 1999). However, some flies in each generation are known to travel 2 to 4 km or more (Porter et al. 2004) and populations of flies expanding on average 74 km over a period of 3.5 years (Porter 2010).

Monitoring of Pseudacteon spp. is achieved with a variety of methods: actively through direct collections of flies at disturbed ant colonies with either manual or electrical stimulation (Barr & Calixto 2005; Morrison & Porter 2005), or passively by trapping with a sticky trap (Puckett et al. 2007). Until the current study, monitoring of these species in Arkansas had been concentrated at and near release sites to determine Pseudacteon establishment. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of Pseudacteon spp. in Arkansas through wider-scale monitoring.


Trap Design

To determine presence or absence, passive trapping was used based on a modified version of a PTS (pizza tri-stand) sticky trap (Puckett et al. 2007). The modified Puckett trap (Fig. 1) consisted of a pizza tri-stand (Polyking® No. 20431) covered in Tanglefoot®, glued to the flat side of an inverted portion cup (Dart® No. 100PC), which was hot glued to the underside of a plastic cup lid (Dart® No. 8JL). This device was placed in the center of the bottom half of a plastic Petri dish (150 by 15 mm). The surfaces of the portion cup and the inner lip of the Petri dish were coated with Fluon®, to prevent ants from climbing up the trap or out of the Petri dish.

Fig. 1.

A modified Puckett trap.


One trap was placed per location by first locating a mound of substantial size and activity. The mound was then disturbed, by kicking it over creating a flat surface on which the Petri dish was placed. As ants climbed into the Petri dish, a few ants were crushed by hand to induce alarm pheromone release and the trap was placed in the center of the Petri dish. A brightly colored pin flag (91 cm long) was positioned alongside the trap. Global positioning system (GPS) coordinates were recorded for each location, and a corresponding number written on the lid of the trap.

Traps were retrieved 20 to 24 h after placement. At time of retrieval, an 8 oz expanded polystyrene foam cup (Dart® No. 8J8) was placed over the trap, and the lid was snapped in place. The cup prevented damage and contamination to the sticky portion of the trap.

Sampling at Release Locations

Fourteen releases of Pseudacteon spp. were made in Arkansas from 1998 to 2009 (Table 1). Sampling along transects in the cardinal directions from the release sites began in 2002 (Pike Co.) and 2004 (Miller Co.). In 2009, the Miller, Perry, Pike, and Sevier County release sites were revaluated for this study to confirm establishment of Pseudacteon spp. A 1.6-km interval was used between traps along each transect placed in Pike, Miller, and Sevier Counties, and at 0.8-km intervals in Perry County. Transects were determined by locating roads and highways on aerial maps that radiated out from the release site in north, south, east, and west directions. One modified Puckett trap was placed at each sampling location.

Sampling Bordering Counties

Sampling was intended to monitor spread of established populations of Pseudacteon spp. in bordering counties/parishes of neighboring states of Louisiana (Henne et al. 2007), Mississippi (Thead et al. 2005), and Tennessee (Graham et al. 2003; Parkman et al. 2005; Weeks & Callcott 2008), and sampling packages were sent to University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service County Agents in imported fire ant infested counties in eastern and southern Arkansas in the early summer of 2009. Each package contained four modified Puckett traps, latex gloves, and an information sheet. Instructions were to place the traps during the summer months, as previously described, at 4 locations within the county. Deployed traps were returned from 4 bordering counties: Columbia, Lafayette, Phillips, and St. Francis. Geographic coordinates were recorded on the instruction sheet with the number of the corresponding trap.




Sampling Along Regional Transects

Due to possible expansion of Pseudacteon spp. from neighboring states, sampling transects were identified and mapped in 3 regions: western, southeastern, and southwestern Arkansas (Fig. 2). Transects began at the state line of the adjacent state and traveled inward, with modified Puckett traps placed at 3-mile intervals and GPS coordinates recorded for each trap. Sampling was conducted for 36 h along transects from each region between 19 Sep and 3 Oct 2009.

Fig. 2.

Regional transects in Arkansas (SE1, SE2, SE3, SW1, SW2, SW3, SW4, W1, W2, W3, W4) (ESRI Inc. 2009).


Phorid Fly Identifications

Upon retrieval, modified Puckett traps were taken to the University of Arkansas laboratory (Fayetteville, AR) and GPS coordinates logged into Google Earth™. Traps were examined under a dissecting microscope for presence of Pseudacteon spp. The sticky portion of the trap was sprayed with liquid degreaser (Goo Gone™) if fly removal was necessary. Species were identified based on the morphology of the female ovipositor (Porter & Pesquero 2001). Voucher specimens of P. curvatus, P. tricuspis, and P. obtusus were obtained from laboratory specimens and the phorid fly rearing facility in Gainesville, FL for identification of male and female flies. Male Pseudacteon spp. are currently difficult to identify through use of keys (Morrison et al. 1997; Porter & Pesquero 2001).


Release Locations

Traps placed along transects radiating from the phorid fly release sites yielded surprising results. Of the 20 traps retrieved from Sevier County, no Pseudacteon spp. were caught. Traps from Miller, Perry, and Pike Counties captured Pseudacteon spp. Along the Miller County release site transects, P. curvatus was captured at 3 locations north of Texarkana, in the southeastern part of Little River County (Fig. 3). However, this was unexpected because the phorid fly species released in Miller County in 2004 was P. tricuspis (Fig. 3, I on map). While possible, it is unlikely that these captures resulted from cross contamination of the 2 species at the rearing facility. Several factors are in place to prevent cross contamination including parasitization of the ants in separate rooms and lack of available ants of preferred host size. Furthermore, voucher sampling is conducted to insure parasitization by the correct species (Amy Croft, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, personal communication). A plausible explanation could be the expansion of P. curvatus from released and established populations in the bordering states of Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas (Weeks & Callcott 2008; Anne-Marie Callcott, USDA-APHIS, personal communication). Similar results were observed along the northeast transect of the Pike County release site; capture of a Pseudacteon fly (P. curvatus) different from the species originally released (P. tricuspis). Due to the proximity (5 km) with the Clark County release site (Fig. 3A), it is possible that this capture was from movement of P. curvatus from Clark County, although revaluation of Clark County was not conducted in 2009. In Perry County, capture of P. curvatus was recovered at the initial release site and at locations to the south (0.5 km) and east (2.2 km).

Fig. 3.

Pseudacteon curvatus release sites in (A) Clark Co., (B) Grant Co., (C) Perry Co., and 2009 capture locations including (D) Phillips Co., Arkansas. Pseudacteon tricuspis release sites in (E) Bradley Co., (F) Drew Co., (G) Garland Co., (H) Jefferson Co., (I) Miller Co., (J) Perry Co., (K) Pike Co., (L) Sevier Co., Arkansas and 2009 capture locations (ESRI Inc. 2009).


Bordering Counties

Puckett traps from Columbia, Lafayette, and St. Francis Counties were devoid of Pseudacteon flies, although all traps returned from Phillips County on the Mississippi border captured P. curvatus. Phillips County is the one of 2 counties in Arkansas (Crittenden Co. the other) currently known to have only S. richteri and no record of S. invicta (Robert Vander Meer, USDA-ARS, personal communication). Sampling locations in Phillips Co. were located on the western levee of the Mississippi River, northwest of Friars Point, MS (Fig. 3D), adjacent to counties in Mississippi and Tennessee with known S. richteri populations (Streett et al. 2006; Oliver et al. 2009). The high number of P. curvatus found on 1 trap (∼172) implies sufficient colonies of S. richteri to support P. curvatus populations.

Regional Transects

A total of 176 modified Puckett traps were placed along transects in western, southeastern, and southwestern Arkansas (Fig. 2). In the western region of transects, 28 traps contained P. curvatus, and 2 contained P. tricuspis (Fig. 3). Of the traps that captured P. tricuspis, one was located 29.5 km west of the P. tricuspis release in Pike County, and the other was 46 km northwest of the release site. All 4 transects in this region included captures of P. curvatus. On the 2 northerly routes (W1 and W2), traps with P. curvatus were found at regular intervals with the most easterly capture 54 km from the Arkansas/Oklahoma state line. The remaining 2 transects (W3 and W4) also had captures. Transect (W3) picked up P. curvatus 13 km from the Arkansas/Oklahoma border. The 3 traps from the most southerly transect (W4) that contained P. curvatus were located near the northern section of the Miller County release site transect. This directional pattern of recoveries supports the hypothesis of immigration from confirmed P. curvatus populations in Le Flore County, Oklahoma (Weeks & Callcott 2008) approximately 24 km northwest of Mena, Arkansas. Prevailing winds generally do not correlate with dispersion patterns (Morrison et al. 2000), as flies move close to the ground where wind is reduced.

Pseudacteon curvatus but not P. tricuspis was trapped along the southeastern region transects. P. curvatus was found at 1 location in Union County, north of E1 Dorado, and on 12 traps along each of the other transects (SE2 and SE3) to the east (Fig. 3). From the 2 easterly transects (SE2, SE3), traps with P. curvatus were found 91 km north of the Arkansas/Louisiana border and 65 km west of the Arkansas/Mississippi border. This distribution in Arkansas is expected based on collections of P. curvatus in bordering counties along the western side of Mississippi (Adams, Bolivar, Claiborne, Coahoma, Desoto, Jefferson, Tunica, Warren, Washington, Wilkinson), and along Louisiana's northern side (Claiborne, East Carroll, Morehouse, Union, West Carroll) (Anne-Marie Callcott, USDA-APHIS, personal communication).

Pseudacteon tricuspis was captured at 2 locations along a transect (SW3) of the southwestern region of Arkansas (Fig. 3). One of the traps was located in the northern part of Nevada County, in the city of Prescott, and the other was 18 km to the southeast. Their proximity to the Pike County release site (Fig. 3K), 20 km northwest, may suggest their origin, although P. curvatus appeared in no samples taken from the Pike County release site transect. Weather conditions may have played a role in the lack of Pseudacteon spp. present on the remaining 55 traps in this region. Temperatures for the region on 3 Oct 2009 ranged from a low of 8°C to a high of 26°C. Temperatures below 20°C inhibit activity of Pseudacteon flies (Morrison et al. 1999; Wuellner et al. 2002). On 3 Oct 2009 temperatures were above 20°C for a 7-h period midday (11:00 AM to 6:00 PM CST) and below 20°C for the entire day of 4 Oct 2009, when the traps were retrieved. However, 2 traps located on the transect southeast of Prescott, AR collected P. tricuspis. Weather data suggests similar conditions for the Prescott, AR area, although slightly warmer temperatures (17°C) were recorded for an additional 3.5 h on the morning of 4 Oct 2009.

Of the traps that collected Pseudacteon spp., no traps contained both species. Perhaps because P. tricuspis is reliant on larger ants, P. curvatus is able to establish more readily where P. curvatus and P. tricuspis overlap, and thus were not detected if present in low densities (Gilbert et al. 2008). Another factor for the lack of both species in the trap may be due to the modification of the Puckett trap. The 2 differences in the traps design were the attractant used and the placement of the trap. Traps were placed on a disturbed mound with live ants whereas Puckett traps were placed in an open area with midden (Puckett et al. 2007). The Puckett trap as originally designed captured more P. tricuspis than P. curvatus, although seasonal fluctuations could be a variable (Puckett et al. 2007).


Passive Pseudacteon trapping with the modified Puckett trap provided advantages over direct collection from disturbed mounds. Because it is deployed quickly, multiple traps can be placed over a large area which allows continuous and simultaneous sampling (Puckett et al. 2007). The manpower needed to achieve similar coverage using observational sampling is cost prohibitive. The addition of the protective cup to the original design allowed longer storage time between collection and examination of the trap, protection of the sticky portion, and reduced contamination. The modification based on disturbed mounds and fluon-coated petri dishes rather than fire ant midden was advantageous in that maintenance of a fire ant colony for collection of midden is no longer necessary. With this modification, trapped fire ants rather than fire ant midden serve as the Pseudacteon fly attractant.

The results suggest establishment and expansion of P. curvatus from the release site in Perry County, and P. tricuspis from the release site in Pike County While limited, the current range of P. tricuspis in Arkansas appeared to be along a narrow 86-km band stretching from northwest Pike County to south central Nevada County, and 25 km west of the release site. The current distribution of P. curvatus in Arkansas suggested natural movement from surrounding states. Despite extensive sampling across southern Arkansas, many areas remained unsampled. Additional trapping would provide a better understanding of the distribution of Pseudacteon spp. in Arkansas.


We thank Anne-Marie Callcott of the USDA APHIS lab in Gulfport, MS for approving Pseudacteon spp. for release, Amy Bass, Amy Croft, and Deborah Roberts of the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for assistance in supplying phorid flies, Ed Brown, Jerry Clemons, Randy Forst, Rex Herring, Mike McCarter, Shawn Payne, Doug Petty, Amy Simpson, Rebecca Thomas, Shaun Rhodes, Carla Vaught, Joe Vestal, and Danny Walker of the University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service for assistance placing phorid fly traps, Michael Hamilton and Robert Goodson for collecting imported fire ants for identification, and Ricky Corder of the University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service for assistance.



C. L. Barr , and A. Calixto 2005. Electrical stimulation of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to enhance phorid fly, Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera: Phoridae), detection. Southwest. Entomol. 3: 165–168. Google Scholar


S. Campiolo , M. A. Pesquero , and H. G. Fowler 1994. Size selective oviposition by phorid (Diptera: Phoridae) parasitoids on workers of the fire ant, Solenopsis saevissima (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Etiologia. 4: 85–86. Google Scholar


L. Chen , and H. Y. Fadamiro 2007. Behavioral and electroantennogram responses of phorid fly Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera: Phoridae) to red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta odor and trail pheromone. J. Insect Behav. 20: 267–287. Google Scholar


J. Clemons , M. McCarter , J. Gavin , D. Petty , K. Loftin , D. Shanklin , and J. Hopkins 2003. Phorid fly releases in Arkansas: county agents perspective, pp. 40–41 In L. Greenberg , and C. Lerner [eds.], Proc. Imported Fire Ant Conference, Palm Springs, CA. Google Scholar


F. L. Consoli , C. T. Wuellner , S. B. Vinson , and L. E. Gilbert 2001. Immature development of Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera: Phoridae), an endoparasitoid of the red Imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 94: 97–109. Google Scholar


Esri, Inc. 2009. ArcGIS 9.3.1. ESRI, Inc., Redlands, CA. Google Scholar


D. H. Feener , and B. V. Brown 1992. Reduced foraging of Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the presence of parasitic Pseudacteon spp. (Diptera: Phoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 85: 80–84. Google Scholar


P. J. Folgarait , and L. E. Gilbert 1999. Phorid parasitoids affect foraging under different availability of food in Argentina. Ecol. Entomol. 24: 1–11. Google Scholar


P. J. Folgarait , O. A. Bruzzone , R. J. W. Patrock , and L. E. Gilbert 2002. Developmental rates and host specificity for Pseudacteon parasitoids (Diptera: Phoridae) of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Argentina. J. Econ. Entomol. 95: 1151–1158. Google Scholar


P. J. Folgarait , O. A. Bruzzone , and L. E. Gilbert 2003. Seasonal patterns of activity among species of black fire ant parasitoid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in Argentina explained by analysis of climatic variables. Biol. Control. 28: 368–378. Google Scholar


P. J. Folgarait , M. G. Chirno , R. J. W. Patrock , and L. E. Gilbert 2005. Development of Pseudacteon obtusus (Diptera: Phoridae) on Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ. Entomol. 34: 308–316. Google Scholar


H. G. Fowler , M. A. Pesquero , S. Campiolo , and S. D. Porter 1995. Seasonal activity of species of fire ants in Brazil. Cientifica. 23: 367–371. Google Scholar


L. E. Gilbert 1996. Prospects of controlling fire ants with parasitoid flies the perspective from research based at Brackenridge Field Laboratory, pp. 77–92 In W. E. Cohen [ed.], Texas Quail Short Course II, Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A&M University, Kingsville, TX. Google Scholar


L. E. Gilbert , and L. W. Morrison 1997. Patterns of host specificity in Pseudacteon parasitoid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) that attack Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ. Entomol 26: 1149–1154. Google Scholar


L. E. Gilbert , C. L. Barr , A. A. Calixto , J. L. Cook , B. M. Drees , E. G. Lebrun , R. J. W. Patrock , R. M. Plowes , S. D. Porter , and R. T. Puckett 2008. Introducing phorid fly parasitoids of red imported fire ant workers from South America to Texas: outcomes vary by region and by Pseudacteon species released. Southwest. Entomol. 33: 15–29. Google Scholar


L. C. Graham , S. D. Porter , R. M. Pereira , H. D. Dorough , and A. T. Kelley 2003. Field releases of the decapitating phorid fly Pseudacteon curvatus (Diptera: Phoridae) for control of imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Alabama, Florida, and Tennessee. Florida Entomol. 86: 334–339. Google Scholar


D. C. Henne , S. J. Johnson , and S. D. Porter 2007. Status of the fire ant decapitating fly Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera: Phoridae) in Louisiana. Florida Entomol. 90: 565–569. Google Scholar


N. J. Mehdiabadi , and L. E. Gilbert 2002. Colony level impacts of parasitoid flies on fire ants. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269: 1695–1699. Google Scholar


L. W. Morrison , and L. E. Gilbert 1999. Host specificity in two additional Pseudacteon spp. (Diptera: Phoridae), parasitoids of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomol. 82: 404–409. Google Scholar


L. W. Morrison , and J. R. King 2004. Host location behavior in a parasitoid of imported fire ants. J. Insect Behav. 17: 367–383. Google Scholar


L. W. Morrison , and S. D. Porter 2005. Phenology and parasitism rates in introduced populations of Pseudacteon tricuspis, a parasitoid of Solenopsis invicta. Biocontrol. 50: 127–141. Google Scholar


L. W. Morrison , C. G. Dallaglio-Holvorcem , and L. E. Gilbert 1997. Oviposition behavior and development of Pseudacteon flies (Diptera: Phoridae), parasitoids of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ. Entomol. 26: 716–724. Google Scholar


L. W. Morrison , E. A. Kawazoe , R. Guerra , and L. E. Gilbert 1999. Phenology and dispersal in Pseudacteon flies (Diptera: Phoridae), parasitoids of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 92: 198–207. Google Scholar


L. W. Morrison , E. A. Kawazoe , R. Guerra and L. E. Gilbert 2000. Ecological interactions of Pseudacteon parasitoids and Solenopsis ant hosts: environmental correlates of activity and effects on competitive hierarchies. Ecol. Entomol. 25: 433–444. Google Scholar


J. B. Oliver , R. K. Vander Meer , S. A. Ochieng , N. N. Youssef , E. Pantaleoni , F. A. Mrema , K. M. Vail , J. P. Parkman , S. M. Valles , W. G. Haun , and S. Powell 2009. Statewide survey of imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) populations in Tennessee. J. Entomol. Sci. 44: 149–157. Google Scholar


M. R. Orr , S. H. Seike , W. W. Benson , and L. E. Gilbert 1995. Flies suppress fire ants. Nature. 373: 292–293. Google Scholar


M. R. Orr , S. H. Seike , and L. E. Gilbert 1997. Foraging ecology and patterns of diversification in dipteran parasitoids of fire ants in South Brazil, genus Pseudacteon (Phoridae). Ecol. Entomol. 22: 305–314. Google Scholar


P. Parkman , K. Vail , T. Rashid , J. Oliver , R. Pereira , S. D. Porter , M. Shires , G. Haun , S. Powell , L. Thead , and J. T. Vogt 2005. Establishment and spread of Pseudacteon curvatus in Tennessee, pp. 111–112 In D. J. Meloche [ed.], Proc. Imported Fire Ant Conference, Gulfport, MS. Google Scholar


M. A. Pesquero , S. D. Porter , H. G. Fowler , and S. Campiolo 1995. Rearing of Pseudacteon spp. (Diptera: Phoridae), parasitoids of fire ants (Solenopsis spp.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 119: 677–678. Google Scholar


M. A. Pesquero , S. Campiolo , H. G. Fowler , and S. D. Porter 1996. Diurnal patterns of ovipositional activity in two Pseudacteon fly parasitoids of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomol. 79: 455–456. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter 1998a. Host specific attraction of Pseudacteon flies (Diptera: Phoridae) to fire ant colonies in Brazil. Florida Entomol. 81: 423–429. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter 1998b. Biology and behavior of Pseudacteon decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae) that parasitize Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomol. 81: 292–309. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter 2000. Host specificity and risk assessment of releasing the decapitating phorid fly Pseudacteon curvatus as a classical biocontrol agent for imported fire ants. Biol. Control. 19: 35–47. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter 2010. Distribution of the Formosa strain of the fire ant decapitating fly Pseudacteon curvatus (Diptera: Phoridae) three and a half years after releases in North Florida. Florida Entomol. 93: 107–112. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter , and L. E. Alonso 1999. Host specificity of fire ant decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in laboratory oviposition tests. J. Econ. Entomol. 92: 110–114. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter , and L. E. Gilbert 2004. Assessing host specificity and field release potential of fire ant decapitating flies (Phoridae: Pseudacteon), pp. 152–176 In R. G. Van Driesche and R. Reardon [eds.], Assessing Host Ranges for Parasitoids and Predators Used for Classical Biological Control: A Guide to Best Practice. FHTET-2004-03, USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, WV. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter , and M. A. Pesquero 2001. Illustrated key to Pseudacteon decapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae) that attack Solenopsis saevissima complex fire ants in South America. Florida Entomol. 84: 691–699. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter , M. A. Pesquero , S. Campiolo , and H. G. Fowler 1995a. Growth and development of Pseudacteon phorid fly maggots (Diptera: Phoridae) in the heads of Solenopsis fire ant workers (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ. Entomol. 24: 475–479. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter , R. K. Vander Meer , M. A. Pesquero , S. Campiolo , and H. G. Fowler 1995b. Solenopsis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) fire ant reactions to attacks of Pseudacteon flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in southeastern Brazil. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 88: 570–575. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter , L. A. Nogueira De Sá , K. Flanders , and L. Thompson 1999. Field releases of the decapitating fly, Pseudacteon tricuspis , p. 102 In L. Reeves [ed.], Proc. Imported Fire Ant Conference, Charleston, SC. Google Scholar


S. D. Porter , L. A. Nogueira De Sá , and L. W. Morrison 2004. Establishment and dispersal of the fire ant decapitating fly Pseudacteon tricuspis in North Florida. Biol. Control. 29: 179–188. Google Scholar


R. T. Puckett , A. Calixto , C. L. Barr , and M. Harris 2007. Sticky traps for monitoring Pseudacteon parasitoids of Solenopsis fire ants. Environ. Entomol. 36: 584–588. Google Scholar


D. A. Streett , T. B. Freeland , and R. K. Vander Meer 2006. Survey of imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) populations in Mississippi. Florida Entomol. 89: 91–92. Google Scholar


L. G. Thead , J. T. Vogt , and D. A. Streett 2005. Dispersal of the fire ant decapitating fly, Pseudacteon curvatus (Diptera: Phoridae) in Northeast Mississippi. Florida Entomol. 88: 214–216. Google Scholar


R. K. Vander Meer and S. D. Porter 2002. Fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, worker alarm pheromones attract Pseudacteon phorid flies, pp. 77–80 In Proc. Imported Fire Ant Conference, Athens, GA. Google Scholar


R. J. Vazquez , S. D Porter , and J. A. Briano 2004. Host specificity of a biotype of the fire ant decapitating fly Pseudacteon curvatus (Diptera: Phoridae) from northern Argentina. Environ. Entomol. 33: 1436–1441. Google Scholar


R. J. Vazquez , S. D. Porter , and J. A. Briano 2006. Field release and establishment of the decapitating fly Pseudacteon curvatus on red imported fire ants in Florida. Biocontrol. 51: 207–216. Google Scholar


R. D. Weeks , and A.-M. A. Callcott 2008. USDA-APHIS and consortium efforts to establish phorid flies (Pseudacteon spp.) in imported fire ant (Solenopsis spp.) populations in the U.S. and Puerto Rico, pp. 87–89 In Proc. Imported Fire Ant Conference, Charleston, SC. Google Scholar


D. F. Williams , and R. D. Deshazo 2004. Biological control of fire ants: an update on new techniques. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 93: 15–22. Google Scholar


C. T. Wuellner , C. G. Dall'Aglio-Holverocem , W. W. Benson , and L. E. Gilbert 2002. Phorid fly (Diptera: Phoridae) oviposition behavior and fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) reaction to attack differs according to phorid species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 93: 257–266. Google Scholar
Jake M. Farnum and Kelly M. Loftin "Distribution of Pseudacteon curvatus and Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera: Phoridae) in Arkansas," Florida Entomologist 94(1), 15-21, (1 March 2011).
Published: 1 March 2011
biological control
phorid fly
Solenopsis invicta
Back to Top