Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2011 Morphometric Variability of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis (Diptera: Culicidae) from Different Ecoregions of Argentina and Bolivia
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Anopheles pseudopunctipennis is a New World species extending from about 30°S in central Argentina to about 40°N in the USA. It is considered one of the most important malaria vectors in South America and its implication in malaria transmission varies along its distribution. We evaluated the effect of ecoregion and geographical distances on the traits or morphological characters of An. pseudopunctipennis females from 15 localities in Argentina and Bolivia using cladistic and morphometric analyses. The cladistic analysis (Maximum Parsimony) demonstrated that the effect of ecoregion characterization in distinguishing between Bolivian and Argentinean populations was stronger than the effect of geographical distances. Morphometric analysis (Discriminant analysis) did not reveal a pattern between Bolivian and Argentinean populations based on geographical distances. Ecoregional characterization of An. pseudopunctipennis populations throughout is range, caused us to conclude that studies of morphological traits characteristics are necessary in differentiating between populations. Moreover, molecular studies are required to determine whether geographical distances influence population differentiation in An. pseudopunctipennis from Argentina and Bolivia, in the extreme south of South America.

Anopheline mosquitoes transmit the malaria parasites Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum, P. ovale, P. malariae and P. knowlesi, which affect the health of more than 40% people in 90 countries. The World Health Organization estimates malaria incidence at 300–500 million clinical cases, with 1.5–2.7 million deaths per year (Collins & Paskewitz 1995; Sallum et al. 2000).

Species of Anopheles Meigen reported to be important malaria vectors include An. (Nyssorhynchus) albimanus Wiedeman, An. (Nyssorhynchus) aquasalis Curry, An. (Nyssorhynchus) darlingi Root and An. (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis Theobald (Forattini 1962). Some species of the Nyssorhynchus subgenus involved in malaria transmission share the same geographical distribution and posses a high degree of morphological similarity (Faran 1980). For example, An. (Nyssorhynchus) evansae Brèthes was misidentified as An. (Nyssorhynchus) benarrochi Gabaldón, Cova Garcia and Lopez and, furthermore, An. benarrochi females were misidentified as An. (Nyssorhynchus) oswaldoi Peryassu, confirmed later as An. benarrochi species (Quiñones et al. 2001; Calle et al. 2002).

The present study was focused on An. pseudopunctipennis, a species with a wide distribution that has distinctive populations defined by allozymes and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) (Estrada-Franco et al. 1993). A more extensive study revealed the existence of three clusters within An. pseudopunctipennis: one comprising specimens from the United States, Mexico and Guatemala, a second cluster including samples from Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile and Argentina, and a third cluster comprising Grenada specimens (Manguin et al. 1995). Rueda et al. (2004), describing the neotype of An. pseudopunctipennis, suggested the need for morphological, molecular and biochemical studies for a better definition of the species limit.

Within the morphological context, morphometry (Rohlf & Marcus 1993; Adams et al. 2004) appears as an important taxonomic tool for species discrimination and species variations (Dujardin et al. 1997, 1998; Calle et al. 2002; Jaramillo et al. 2002; Monroy et al. 2003; Belen et al. 2004; Lehmann et al. 2005; Yurtas et al. 2005; Feliciangeli et al. 2007). Delgado & Rubio-Palis (1993) examined the morphometric variation of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) nuneztovari Gabaldón and detected variability within Venezuelan populations. Later, Rubio-Palis (1998, 2000), using measurements of larval and adult characters of An. darlingi populations from Venezuela, confirmed the separation of this species from Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) marajoara Galvão and Damasceno, Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) braziliensis (Chagas) and Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) argyritarsis Robineau-Desvoidy, and found biological and morphological variations of this species, suggesting it may represent a species complex. Most of these studies were focused on the molecular or morphological characterization of Anopheles species to probe similarity or variability between them or within each, sharing the same geographical areas, and trying to differentiate these populations and their implications as malaria vectors.

In the present paper we used cladistics and morphometric analysis to test whether either ecoregional characterization or geographical distance has a greater effect in differentiating An. pseudopunctipennis populations found in the Transitional and Yungas ecoregions of Argentina and Convergence ecoregion of Bolivia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample Area Characterization

Adult mosquitoes were collected in 15 localities, 13 in Argentina and two in Bolivia. In Argentina, Jujuy and Salta localities were from the Yungas ecoregion, while the Tucumán localities were from the transitional area between Yungas and Chaco ecoregiones (Cabrera & Willink 1973; Dinerstein et al. 1995). Parque Nacional Carrasco (Cochabamba, Bolivia) is in the convergence of three ecoregions: Cloud Forests (Yungas), Dry Forests (Dry Chaco) and Tropical Amazon Rainforest (The Nature Conservancy 2008). In Taruma (Santa Cruz, Bolivia), the ecoregion is called Transitional Amazon Forest of Chiquitana (IBIF 2006) (Fig. 1).

The Yungas has a large geographical distribution in South America, from Venezuela through northwestern Argentina. It is frequently fragmented by either natural events (flooding rivers) or human activities (agriculture, pastures and wood production). The typical piedmont vegetation consists of two types of vegetation with a north-south orientation in response to temperature gradient: one is the forest of “palo blanco” (Calycophyllum multiflorum Griseb. (Castelo)) and “palo amarillo” (Phyllostylon rhamnoides (J. Poiss ) Taub), and the second is the forest of “tipa” (Tipuana tipu (Benth.) Kuntze) and “pacará” (Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Veil.) Morong.). Both vegetation types are under anthropic pressure, that in the impoverished south is nearly completely destroyed, and that in the north is more diverse (Prado 1995; Brown et al. 2001).

The Chaco ecoregion extends from southern Bolivia through western Paraguay, southern Brazil and north-central Argentina. It is composed of deciduous xeric forests with grasses, cacti and terrestrial bromeliads, and, also, the savannas and the halophytic steppes (Cabrera & Willink 1973; Cabrera 1976; Dinerstein et al. 1995). In western Chaco province, there is a transitional area (with the Yungas) (Ayarde 1995). The Chaco province is threatened by cattle grazing, seasonal fires and the conversion of natural habitats for agriculture (Dinerstein et al. 1995).

Fig. 1.

Localities of An. pseudopunctipennis collection in the Argentinean provinces of Salta (fi01_428.gif), Tucumán (fi02_428.gif) and Jujuy (fi03_428.gif) and in the Bolivian provinces of Cochabamba (+) and Santa Cruz (fi04_428.gif), within three ecoregions (after Dinerstein et al. 1996).

f01_428.jpg

Parque Nacional Carrasco near Cochabamba, Bolivia lies in the Sub-Andean range. This park has vegetation typical of the semihumid Puna, the perennial wet to semi-wet forest, the Amazonic Sub-Andean forest, the pre-Andean forest, the inter-Andean dry forest and the Tucumanian-Bolivian subtropical mountainous forest, also known as Yungas. The main problems in this area are deforestation to allow cultivation, commercialization of tree species of economic value, and highway construction (boliviaenlared.com 2005– 2006).

At Tarumá (Santa Cruz Department in eastern Bolivia), the climate in the region largely determines the predominant vegetation known as the Transitional Amazon Forest of Chiquitana (IBIF 2006). This is a characteristic forest with Amazonian humid weather alternating with Chaco dry weather. Thus two well-marked seasons exist, a dry and a wet one. During the wet season (Apr–Nov) most of the rainfall occurs, and during the dry season (May–Jul) rainfall decreases considerably. In recent years the environment has changed and the weather has become drier. The forest is mostly dry tropical, with some interspersed savanna. To the north is the humid part of the forest and the savannas. The pastures present the most important problem because of soil degradation, but recently sustainable agriculture has started to be used in an effort to try to conserve the environment (IBIF 2006).

Specimen sources

In Argentina, the adult specimens were collected as described by Dantur et al. (2003, 2005, 2009). In Bolivia, specimens were collected individually as larvae and reared to adults. They were subsequently sacrificed and identified using the taxonomic key of Wilkerson & Strickman (1990). To carry out the morphometric measurements (in mm), the specimens were mounted on entomological pins, labeled, and examined with a stereoscopic microscope.

One hundred and seventy-three An. pseudopunctipennis female specimens were analyzed: 24 from Salta (localities: Parque Nacional El Rey, El Oculto and Aguas Blancas), 41 from Jujuy (INTA Yuto and Lagunita Yuto), 51 from Tucumán (Iltico, Dique El Molino, Quebrada de Lules, Potrero Las Tablas, El Cadillal, Arroyo Molle Yaco, Arroyo Hornillo and La Sala) and 57 from Bolivia (Parque Nacional Carrasco and Taruma) (Table 1). The following characters were measured: length of proboscis and length of palpomeres 1–5, pale and dark scale spots on the costal vein. For wing spots, we adopted the nomenclature proposed by Wilkerson & Peyton (1990): length of the basal pale (BP), sectoral dark (SD), subcostal pale (SCP), preapical dark (PD), preapical pale (PP).

TABLE 1.

ANOPHELES PSEUDOPUNCTIPENNIS COLLECTION LOCALITIES IN ARGENTINA AND BOLIVIA.

t01_428.gif

Data analysis

Cladistics. Parsimony analysis was conducted with the software TNT 1.0 (Goloboff et al. 2005), which allows the use of continuous characters to obtain a phylogenetic hypothesis. Once the confidence intervals were calculated (CI = Mean ± Zα/2 .S/√N) with α = 0.05 (Norman & Streiner 1996) for each locality of An. pseudopunctipennis (Table 2), the algorithm proposed by Goloboff et al. (2006) was used, where the morphometric characters were treated as additive, and the ranges were optimized directly on the most parsimonious cladograms. The neotype redescription of An. pseudopunctipennis was used (Rueda et al. 2004) as the outgroup and for rooting cladograms. Finally, the exact algorithm of implicit enumeration for the search of the most parsimonious solution was followed.

Morphometries: The logarithmic transformation (Log10 (X + 1)) was carried out on the complete data set to minimize intrapopulation variation due to static allometry. Subsequently, the size effects were corrected following Klingenberg (1996) based on the common model of linear growth (Common Principal Components Analysis or CPCA). The CPC scores were considered as an estimate of within-group variation and were used as variables in a canonical discriminate analysis (CDA) except for CPC1, which is an estimate of the common allometric pattern (Klingenberg 1996; Dujardin 2000). The variables were introduced in the PAD 0.81 program (Dujardin 2006) to carry out a Discriminant Analysis (DA). The results were graphically represented in a scatter plot using the first two canonical discriminant functions as axes. To examine the morphological similarity between the populations, the Mahalanobis distances obtained in CDA and the Cluster Analysis with Unweighted Pair Group Method Analysis (UPGMA) NEIGHBOR 3.6 (Felsenstein 2004) were used, and the resulting dendrogam was visualized in TREEVIEW 1.6.6 (Page 2001). To test for significant differences among populations, size variables were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05).

TABLE 2.

MORPHOMETRICS CONFIDENCE INTERVALS (95% CI) FOR MEASUREMENTS OF PALPOMERES AND BASAL PALE OF AN. PSEUDOPUCTIPENNIS COLLECTED FROM LOCALITIES IN ARGENTINA AND BOLLVIA.

t02a_428.gif

TABLE 2.

MORPHOMETRICS CONFIDENCE INTERVALS (95% CI) FOR MEASUREMENTS OF PALPOMERES AND BASAL PALE OF AN. PSEUDOPUCTIPENNIS COLLECTED FROM LOCALITIES IN ARGENTINA AND BOLLVIA.

t02b_428.gif

RESULTS

In the cladistic analysis six equally parsimonious trees were obtained of 4,608 steps in length, with consistency and retention indices of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. The strict consensus of these trees (Fig. 2) depicts the Bolivian populations (Tarumá and Parque Nacional Carrasco) as more basal (ancestral), sister of the node that includes all the Argentinean populations (Salta, Jujuy and Tucumán) consisting of a polytomy that includes 7/8 of the Tucumán localities (Arroyo Mole Yaco, El Cadillal, Quebrada de Lules, El Molino, Iltico, Arroyo Hornillo and La Sala), a clade that includes a mixture of Jujuy (INTA Yuto and Lagunita Yuto) and Tucumán (Potrero Las Tablas) localities and finally a clade that contains the Salta localities (El Oculto, Parque Nacional El Rey and Aguas Blancas).

Fig. 2.

Strict consensus tree of An. pseudopunctipennis from localities in Argentina (Salta, Jujuy and Tucumán) and Bolivia.

f02_428.jpg

The node that separates Argentinean and Bolivian populations is supported by the following synapomorphies: length of palpomere 1 (character 0: 0.109–0.116 → 0.127), length of palpomere 5 (character 4: 0.208–0.222 → 0.237–0.253), length of the basal pale (character 5: 0.092–0.093 → 0.018–0.033) and proboscis length (character 10: 1.905–1.958 → 1.990– The Salta clade (El Oculto+Parque Nacional El Rey+Aguas Blancas) is characterized by the length of palpomere 1 (character 0: 0.127 → 0.245– and Parque Nacional El Rey and Aguas Blancas clustered together by the length of the basal pale spot (character 5:0.033 → 0.063). The clade comprising Potrero Las Tablas, INTA Yuto and Lagunita Yuto populations is supported by the length of the basal pale spot (character 5: 0.022–0.033 → 0.090–0.091). Populations of An. pseudopunctipennis in some localities can be defined by autapomorphies: Aguas Blancas by the length of the basal pale spot (character 5: 0.063 → 0.106), Potrero Las Tablas by the length of palpomere 1 (character 0: 0.127 → 0.0148–0.206), Iltico by the length of palpomere 1 (character 0: 0.127 → 0.129–0.159), Quebrada de Lules by the length of sector dark spot (character 7: 0,388–0,443 → 0.506) and Lagunita Yuto by proboscis length (character 10: 2.303–0.2305 → 2.181–2.277).

In contrast, the DA factorial map, starting from the first nine conformation components (representing 98% of the variation of the conformation), showed partial separation of the Salta population and overlap between Tucumán and Jujuy, Cochabamba and Santa Cruz populations (Fig. 3A). The reclassification of the five populations was as follows: Salta 23/24 (95%) and Jujuy 35/41 (85%) and Cochabamba 27/31 (87%), and it was reduced in Tucumán 38/51 (74%) and Santa Cruz 17/26 (65%).

The cluster analysis UPGMA (Fig. 3B) shows the differentiation of Salta from the other four. Tucumán population differs from the cluster formed by Cochabamba, Santa Cruz and Jujuy The size variable (Fig. 3C) showed significant differences (p < 0.05), from the smallest to the largest, for three groups of populations: Cochabamba, < Salta, Tucumán and Santa Cruz < Jujuy.

DISCUSSION

The geographical distribution of An. pseudopunctipennis is a sympatric with other species, such as An. abimanus and An. argyritarsis; but each of these species occupies a somewhat different typical environment.

As reported by Patz et al. (2000) and Alencar et al. (2009), it is known that environmental changes will modify vector-borne disease transmission patterns. Accordingly in Argentina, Burgos et al. (1994) reported that malaria and An. pseudopunctipennis distributions acquire different patterns when moving from the foothills to the central region of the country where climatic conditions are more favorable for the development of both. Curto et al. (2003) disagreed with these authors, and asserted that An. pseudopunctipennis and malaria distribution would change in relation to modifications in the climatic conditions and eventually would be restricted to the extreme northwest of the country.

Fig. 3.

A) Factorial map generated by Discriminant Analysis for the conformational variables of An. pseudopunctipennis in populations of Salta (1: n = 24), Tucumán (2: n = 51), Jujuy (3: n = 41), Cochabamba (4: n = 31) and Santa Cruz (5: n = 26). B) Dendrogram of the UPGMA from Mahalanobis distance in populations of An. pseudopunctipennis from Bolivia (Cochabamba and Santa Cruz) and Argentina (Jujuy, Tucuman and Salta). C) Isometric size derived from the PCA.

f03_428.jpg

Environmental changes will directly affect vector populations by causing modification within each population of traits including morphological characters that evolve under ecological pressure (Rundle & Nosil 2005; Alencar et al. 2009). Different studies have concluded that morphometry is useful because it is focused on morphological traits and modifications in them, and is a good tool for the discrimination of vector species as well as for studies of intraspecific population variability (Dujardin et al. 1997, 1998; Rubio-Palis 1998; Calle et al. 2002: Yurtas et al. 2005). Just as in Haemagogus capricornii Lutz and Haemagogus janthinomys Dyar populations in Brazil, the molecular and morphological diversity of An. pseudopunctipennis populations can be expected to evolve under different types of ecological pressure (ecoregional characteristics) (McKinnon et al. 2004; Alencar et al. 2009).

There are several works dealing with An. pseudopunctipennis populations in America. By analyses of specimens from various localities, Estrada-Franco et al. (1993) and Manguin et al. (1995) recognized the existence of three An. pseudopunctipennis population groups: one from the southern USA, Mexico and Guatemala, another from South America through Central America including Belize, and a third on Grenada Island. Previous to the present study, there had been no examination of external morphological characters of An. pseudopunctipennis populations in relation to ecoregional characteristics. This is the first report that deals with the morphological traits of specimens that have been affected by the ecological conditions that characterize each ecoregion.

In view of the risk of malaria re-emergence in the extreme northwest of Argentina, where until now only a few cases were reported, the behavior of this species becomes very important. Because there is active transmission of the disease in certain areas of Bolivia near Argentina, the need to differentiate between the various An. pseudopunctipennis populations in relation to transmission patterns is critical. The cladistic analyses described here accurately differentiated between Argentinean and Bolivian populations by proboscis and palpomere lengths. Similarly, Manguin et al. (1999) found that proboscis length and the forefemur differentiated populations of An. darlingi.

Morphometric analyses did not reveal any population differentiation of An. pseudopunctipennis based on geographical distances. Bolivian and Tucumán populations should be the most differentiated, but the results of the Discriminant Analysis showed that Salta populations have the least overlap. The UPGMA separated the Salta group of specimens from the remaining four population groups, and PCA detected the greatest difference between Jujuy and Cochabamba.

We conclude that the methods used were useful for the analysis of An. Pseudopunctipennis populations, allowing us (1) to differentiate between two An. pseudopunctipennis populations (Bolivian and Argentinean), and (2) to discover that the characteristics of the ecoregion, i.e., the local environment, cause such differentiation between populations to occur. Finally, it is necessary to consider the effect of the changing global weather and in particular, the consequent increase in average global temperatures and accumulated rainfall (Magnuson 2001; Moreno 2006; Alencar et al. 2009) that will affect not only malaria transmission patterns, but also cause the vector populations involved to evolve further (McMichael 2001; Alencar et al. 2009). For this reason it is necessary to acquire further knowledge about the possible existence of An. pseudopunctipennis populations in the extreme south of South America.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Nery Vianconi and Enrique Laci, Technicians of the National Coordination of Vectors Control, Ministry of Health of the Argentina, for their field assistance. This work was supported by Grants (PICT 01-04347; PICT 02- 12605) from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (FONCyT), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas Técnicas (CONICET), Consejo de Investigaciones de la Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (CIUNT) and Coordinatión Nacional de Control de Vectores (Ministerio de Salud de la Nación). The samples from Bolivia were collected by G. N. Fritz and R. Rodriguez, supported in part by the United States National Institutes of Health, Grant RO1 AI 31034.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

D. C. Adams , F. J. Rolhf , and D. E. Slice 2004. Geometric morphometries: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital. J. Zool. 71: 5–16. Google Scholar

2.

J. Alencar , J. Rodríguez-Fernández , N. Dégallier , C. Brisola Marcondes , J. Martins Costa , and A. E. Guimarães 2009. Multivariate Discrimination between two cryptic Haemagogus species associated with the transmission of Yellow Fever Virus in the Americas. J. Am. Mosquito Control Assoc. 25: 18–24. Google Scholar

3.

H. Ayarde 1995. Estructura de un sector de selva pedemontana, Réserva Fiscal Parque La Florida, Tucumán, Argentina, pp. 69–78 In A. D. Brown and H. R. Grau [eds.], Investigatión, Conservación y Desarrollo en las selvas subtropicales de montaña, Laboratorio de Investigaciones Ecológicas de las Yungas, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina. Google Scholar

4.

A. Belen , B. Alten , and A. M. Aytekin 2004. Altitudinal variation in morphometric and molecular characteristics of Phlebotomus papatasi populations. Med. Vet. Entomol. 18: 343–350. Google Scholar

5.

Boliviaenlared.com. 2005–2006. Biología: Ecología: Areas protegidas: Parque Carrasco.  http://www.boliviaenlared.com/html/parque-carrasco.html [Accessed 20 May 2008] Google Scholar

6.

A. D. Brown , H. R. Grau , L. Malizia , and A. Grau 2001. Los Bosques Nublados de la Argentina, pp. 623–659 In M. Kappelle and A. D. Brown [eds.], Bosques Nublados de Latinoamérica, Editorial IN-Bio, Costa Rica. Google Scholar

7.

J. J. Burgos , S. I. Curto De Casas , R. U. Carcavallo , and G. I. Galíndez-Girón 1994. Global climate change influence in the distribution of some pathogenic complexes (malaria and chagas disease) in Argentina. Entomología y Vectores 1: 69–78. Google Scholar

8.

A. L. Cabrera 1976. Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería, Vol. II, ACME, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 85 pp. Google Scholar

9.

A. L. Cabrera , and A. Willink 1973. Biogeografía de América Latina. Monografía 13, Serie de Biología, OEA, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar

10.

D. A. Calle , M. Quiñónez , H. Erazo , and N. Jaramillo 2002. Morphometric discrimination of females of five species of Anopheles of the Subgenus Nyssorhynchus from Southern and Northwest Colombia. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 97: 1191–1195. Google Scholar

11.

F. H. Collins , and S. M. Paskewitz 1995. Malaria: Current and future prospects for control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40: 195–219. Google Scholar

12.

S. I. Curto , A. E. Carbajo , and R. Boffi 2003. Aplicación de Sistemas de Information Geográfica en Epidemiología. Caso de estudio: Malaria en la Argentina (1902–2000). GAEA, Sociedad Argentina de Estudios Geográficos, 2003: 239–248. Google Scholar

13.

M. J. Dantur Juri , M. Zaidenberg , and W. R. Almirón 2003. Fluctuation estacional de Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis (Diptera: Culicidae) en un área palúdica de Salta, Argentina. Entomología y Vectores 10: 457–468. Google Scholar

14.

M. J. Dantur Juri , M. Zaidenberg , and W. R. Almirón 2005. Distribution espacial de Anopheles pseudopunctipennis en las Yungas de Salta, Argentina. Revista de Saúde Pública 39: 565–70. Google Scholar

15.

M. J. Dantur Juri , M. Zaidenberg , G. L. Claps , M. Santana , and W. R. Almirón 2009. Malaria transmission in two localities in north-western Argentina. Malaria J. 8: 18. Google Scholar

16.

N. Delgado , and Y. Rubio-Palis 1993. Identification of Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) (Diptera: Culicidae) occurring in Western Venezuela. Mosquito Systematics 25: 222–230. Google Scholar

17.

E. Dinerstein , D. M. Olson , D. J. Graham , A. L. Webster , S. A. Primm , M. P. Bookinber , and G. Ledec 1995. Una evaluation del estado de conservation de las ecoregiones terrestres de América Latina y el Caribe. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar

18.

J. P. Dujardin 2000. Introductión a la Morfometría, con Énfasis en Triatominae y Phlebotominae. Institut de Recherches pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier - France,  http://www.mpl.ird.fr/morphometrics/ [Accessed 15 March 2008] Google Scholar

19.

J. P. Dujardin 2006. PAD (Análisis Discriminante y Permutaciones) versión 0.81. Institut de Recherches pour le Développement (IRD), Montpellier - France.  http://www.mpl.ird.fr/morphometrics/ [Accessed 15 March 2008] Google Scholar

20.

J. P. Dujardin , H. Bermudez , C. Casini , C. J. Schofield , and M. Tibayrenc 1997. Metric differences between sylvatic and domestic Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Bolivia. J. Med. Entomol. 34: 544–551. Google Scholar

21.

J. P. Dujardin , G. Forgues , M. Torrez , E. Martinez , C. Cordoba , and A. Gianella 1998. Morphometrics of domestic Panstrongylus rufotuberculatus in Bolivia. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 92: 219–228. Google Scholar

22.

J. G. Estrada-Franco , G. C. Lanzaro , M. C. Ma , A. Walker-Abbey , P. Romans , C Galvan-Sanchez, J. L. Céspedes , R. Vargas-Sagarnaga , A. Laughinghouse , I. Columbus , and R. W. Gwadz 1993. Characterization of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis sensu lato from three countries of Neotropical America from variation in allozymes and ribosomal DNA. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 49: 735–745. Google Scholar

23.

M. Faran 1980. Mosquito Studies (Diptera: Culicidae) XXXIV A revision of the Albimanus Section of the subgenus Nyssorhynchus of Anopheles. Contributions of the American Entomol. Institute 15: 1–214. Google Scholar

24.

M. D. Feliciangeli , M. Sanchez-Martin , R. Marrero , C. Davies , and J. P. Dujardin 2007. Morphometric evidence for a possible role of Rhodnius prolixus from palm trees in house re-infestation in the State of Barinas (Venezuela). Acta Tropica 101: 169–177. Google Scholar

25.

J. Felsenstein 2004. NEIGHBOR-Neighbor-Joining and UPGMA methods.  http://evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip/ [Accessed 15 March 2008] Google Scholar

26.

O. P. Forattini 1962. Entomologia Médica. Vol. 1. Parte general, Diptera Anophelini. Facultade de Higiene y Saude Pública, São Paulo. 662 pp. Google Scholar

27.

P. A. Goloboff , J. S. Farris , and K. Nixon 2005. Tree Analysis Using New Technology (TNT). Versión 1.0.  http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/tnt [Accessed 15 March 2008] Google Scholar

28.

P. A. Goloboff , C. I. Mattoni , and A. S. Quinteros 2006. Continuous characters analyzed as such. Cladistics 22: 1–13. Google Scholar

29.

Instituto Bolpviano De Investigaciones Forestales (IBIF). 2006. Estaciones de campo: La Chonta.  http://www.ibifbolivia.org.bo/ESP/estaciones_de_campo/la_chonta.htm [Accessed 20 May 2008] Google Scholar

30.

N. Jaramillo , D. Castillo , and M. Wolff 2002. Geometric morphometric differences between Panstrongylus geniculatus from field and laboratory. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 97: 667–673. Google Scholar

31.

C. P. Klingenberg 1996. Multivariate allometry, pp. 23–49 In L. F. Marcus , M. Corti , A. Loy , G. J. Naylor and D. E. Slice [eds.], Advances in Morphometrics. Proc. NATO-ASI on Morphometrics. Plenum Pres, New York. Google Scholar

32.

P. Lehmann , R. Ordoñez , R. Ojeda-Baranda , J. Mendez De Lira , L. Hidalgo-Sosa , C. Monroy , and J. M. Ransey 2005. Morphometric analysis of Triatoma dimidiata populations (Reduviidae: Triatominae) from Mexico and Northern Guatemala. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 100: 477–482. Google Scholar

33.

J. Magnuson 2001. 150-year global ice record reveals major warming trend. Inter-Am. Inst. Glob. Change Res. 24: 22–25. Google Scholar

34.

S. Manguin , D. Roberts , E. L. Peyton , I. Fernándezsalas , M. Barreto , R. Fernández-Loayza , R. E. Spinola , R. Martinez-Granaou , and M. H. Rodriguez 1995. Biochemical systematic and population genetic structure of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis, vector of malaria in Central and South America. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 53: 362– 377. Google Scholar

35.

S. Manguin , R. C. Wilkerson , J. E. Conn Y. Rubio-Palis , J. Danoff-Burg , and D. Roberts 1999. Population structure of the primary malaria vector in South America, Anopheles darlingi, using isoenzyme, random amplified polymorphic DNA, internal transcribed spacer 2, and morphologic markers. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 60: 364–376. Google Scholar

36.

J. S. McKinnon , S. Mori , B. K. Blackman , L. David , D. M. Kingsley , L. Jamieson , J. Chou , and D. Schluter 2004. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429: 294–298. Google Scholar

37.

A. J. McMichael 2001. Global environmental change as “risk factor”: can epidemiology cope? Am. J. Public Health 91: 1172–1174. Google Scholar

38.

C. Bustamante Monroy , D. M. Rodas , A. Rosales, M. Mejía , and Y. Tabaru 2003. Geographic distribution and morphometric differentiation of Triatoma nitida Usinger 1939 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) in Guatemala. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 98: 37–43. Google Scholar

39.

A. R. Moreno 2006. Climate change and human health in Latin America: drivers, effects, and policies. Region. Environ. Change 6: 157–164. Google Scholar

40.

G. R. Norman , and D. L. Striner 1996. Bioestadística. Rubes Editorial Harcourt SL, ed. Madrid: Harcourt Brace de España, S.A., pp. 150–162. Google Scholar

41.

R. Page 2001. TreeView—Tree drawing software for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows.  http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.avc.uk/rod/rod.html [Accessed 20 March 2008]. Google Scholar

42.

J. A. Patz , T. K. Graczyk , N. Geller , and A. Y. Vittor 2000. Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. Int. J. Parasitol. 30: 1395– 1405. Google Scholar

43.

D. E. Prado 1995. Selva pedemontana: contexto regional y lista florística de un ecosistema en peligro, pp. 19–52 In A. D. Brown and H. R. Grau [eds.], Investigation, Conservatión y Desarrollo en las selvas subtropicales de montaña, Laboratorio de Investigaciones Ecológicas de las Yungas, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina. Google Scholar

44.

M. L. Quiñones , R. E. Harbach , D. A. Calle , F. Ruiz , H. F. Erazo , and Y. M. Linton 2001. Variante morfológica de hembras de Anopheles benarrochi (Diptera: Culicidae) en Putumayo, Colombia. Biomédica 21: 351–359. Google Scholar

45.

F. J. Rolhf , and L. F. Marcus 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 129–132. Google Scholar

46.

Y. Rubio-Palis 1998. Caracterización morfométrica de poblaciones de Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) darlingi del sur de Venezuela. Boletín Entomología Venezolana 13: 141–172. Google Scholar

47.

Y. Rubio-Palis 2000. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) de Venezuela: Taxonomía, bionomía, ecología e importancia médica. Escuela de Malariología y Saneamiento Ambiental “Dr. Arnoldo Gabaldon” y el Proyecto Control de Enfermedades Endémicas. Maracay, Venezuela. 120pp. Google Scholar

48.

L. M. Rueda , E. L. Peyton , and S. Manguin 2004. Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae): Neotype designation and description. J. Med. Entomol. 41: 12–22. Google Scholar

49.

H. D. Rundle , and P. Nosil 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Letters 8: 336–352. Google Scholar

50.

M. A. M. Sallum , T. R. Shultz , and R. C. Wilkerson 2000. Phylogeny of Anophelinae (Diptera: Culicidae) based on morphological characters. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 745–775. Google Scholar

51.

The Nature Conservancy. 2008. Bolivia: Places we protect: Amboro and Carrasco National Park.  http://www.nature.org/wherewework/southamerica/bolivia/work/art10696.html [Accessed 20 May 2008] Google Scholar

52.

R. C. Wilkerson , and E. L. Peyton 1990. Standardized nomenclature for costal wing spots of the genus Anopheles and other spotted-wing mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 27: 207–224. Google Scholar

53.

R. C. Wilkerson , and D. Strickman 1990. Illustrated key to the female anopheline mosquitoes of Central America and Mexico. J. Amer. Mosquito Control Assoc. 6: 7–34. Google Scholar

54.

H. Yurtas , B. Alten , and A. M. Aytekin 2005. Variability in natural populations of Anopheles sacharovi (Diptera: Culicidae) from southeast Anatolia, revealed by morphometric and allozymic analysis. J. Vector Ecol. 30: 206–212. Google Scholar
María J. Dantur Juri, Jonathan Liria, Juan C. Navarro, Roberto Rodriguez, and Gary N. Fritz "Morphometric Variability of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis (Diptera: Culicidae) from Different Ecoregions of Argentina and Bolivia," Florida Entomologist 94(3), 428-438, (1 September 2011). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0307
Published: 1 September 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top