Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2011 Susceptibility of Blissus insularis (Heteroptera: Hemiptera: Blissidae) Populations in Florida to Bifenthrin and Permethrin
Cara Vázquez, Reed N. Royalty, Eileen A. Buss
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis Barber, is a serious insect pest of St. Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze). Control for B. insularis is mainly achieved through insecticides. This pest has developed resistance to several insecticide classes because of near-constant exposure. The goals of this study were to sample select B. insularis populations in Florida to describe their susceptibility to bifenthrin, document new locations of bifenthrin resistance, and evaluate another pyrethroid, permethrin. Lethal concentration ratios (at the LC50) from B. insularis populations collected in 2006 and 2008 showed a 45-4,099-fold resistance to bifenthrin in Citrus, Escambia, Flagler, Hillsborough, Lake, Orange, Osceola, and Volusia counties. One population in Orange County demonstrated a 212-fold resistance to permethrin. There was a positive relationship between the number of insecticide applications made in 2006 and increasing insecticide resistance. This study documents the first case of insecticide resistance in the Florida Panhandle and the first report of B. insularis resistance to permethrin. Observations made during this study and possible causes for the development of insecticide resistance in B. insularis in Florida are discussed.

St. Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze) is the most widely used lawn grass in tropical and subtropical climatic regions (Sauer 1972). It is the primary turfgrass in residential lawns and comprises ∼70% or 1.2 million ha in Florida (Hodges et al. 1994; Busey 2003). The southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis Barber, is considered the most damaging insect pest of this grass (Kerr 1966; Reinert & Kerr 1973; Reinert & Portier 1983; Crocker 1993). Damage is caused by nymphs and adults feeding in phloem sieve elements (Rangasamy et al. 2009), causing wilting, chlorosis, stunting, and death (Beyer 1924; Painter 1928; Negron & Riley 1990; Spike et al. 1991; Vázquez & Buss 2006).

Blissus insularis can be difficult to control in Florida lawns. The tropical climate, particularly in the central and southern part of the state, is favorable for B. insularis feeding and reproduction (Reinert 1982a). Adults can live up to 70 d and a single female can deposit a few eggs per d over several wk for a total of 100–300 eggs (Burton & Hutchins 1958; Leonard 1966; Sweet 2000). Development time from egg to adult takes 5–8 wk (Vázquez et al. 2010) depending on temperature. Blissus insularis has overlapping generations, is highly mobile, and readily disperses to neighboring lawns. They are able to survive on other grass sources until new St. Augustinegrass is located (Kerr & Kuitert 1955; Kelsheimer & Kerr 1957; Kerr 1966; Reinert & Kerr 1973). In addition, St. Augustinegrass is often prone to thatch buildup, which provides an ideal habitat for B. insularis adults and nymphs (Reinert & Kerr 1973; Tashiro 1987).

In 1980, more than $25 million was spent to control B. insularis, with some lawn-care companies making as many as twelve insecticide applications per year to a single lawn (Kerr 1966; Stringfellow 1967, 1968, 1969; Strobel 1971; McGregor 1976; Reinert 1978, Reinert & Niemczyk 1982; Tashiro 1987). By the 1980s, B. insularis had developed resistance to organochlorines, organophosphates, and the carbamate, propoxur (Wolfenbarger 1953; Kerr & Robinson 1958; Kerr 1958, 1961; Reinert 1982a, b; Reinert & Niemczyk 1982; Reinert and Portier 1983).

The pyrethroid, bifenthrin, was the most used insecticide by lawn and ornamental professionals in Florida as determined by a 2003 University of Florida survey (Buss & Hodges 2006). Cherry & Nagata (2005) reported bifenthrin resistance in 14 B. insularis populations in central and south Florida. In 2006, we received multiple complaints of bifenthrin field failures and other pyrethroids as far north as Pensacola, Florida. In developing a resistance management program, it is important to determine where bifenthrin-resistant populations occur in the state and the severity of the problem. Thus, we tested 16 B. insularis populations in 2006 and 6 populations in 2008 in northern and central Florida. Tests included documentation and descriptions of bifenthrin and permethrin susceptibilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

St. Augustinegrass Maintenance

Commercially-obtained plugs of ‘Palmetto’ St. Augustinegrass were planted in 15.2 cm plastic pots filled with Farfard #2 potting soil (Conrad Farfard Inc., Agawam, Massachusetts). Plants were maintained in a University of Florida greenhouse in Gainesville, Florida, and held under a 14L:10D photoperiod with day and night temperatures of 27 and 24°C, respectively. Plants were fertilized weekly with a 20-20-20 complete nitrogen source (NH4NO3) at 0.11 kg N/0.02 m2, watered as needed, and cut to a height of ∼7.6 cm.

2006 Collection Sites

Blissus insularis populations were collected between May and Aug 2006. Two populations were collected from areas where insecticides had not been used, 3 were randomly collected (treatment history unknown), and 11 were from lawns where bifenthrin failures had been reported (Table 1). The number of times lawns were treated before collection and the active ingredients used during 2006 were documented for each site, where possible, and GPS coordinates were recorded. Several populations were collected from the same neighborhood or street, but were considered distinct because their treatment history varied. Populations were named based on location within a neighborhood.

2008 Collection Sites

Blissus insularis populations were collected in Jul 2008. Six populations were from lawns where bifenthrin field failures were reported (Table 2). The active ingredients used during 2008 were documented for each site; however, we were unable to obtain the number of times lawns were treated. GPS coordinates were recorded. Populations were named as previously described.

Insects

Blissus insularis were collected using a modified Weed Eater Barracuda blower/vacuum (Electrolux Home Products, Augusta, Georgia) (Crocker 1993; Nagata & Cherry 1999; Vázquez 2009), transported to the laboratory, sifted from debris, and fifth instars and adults were placed into a colony as outlined by Vázquez et al. (2010). Insects were tested within 1 wk of collection.

2006 Bioassays

Tests were conducted using a sprig-dip bioassay similar to that of Reinert & Portier (1983) and Cherry & Nagata (2005). Serial dilutions were made with formulated bifenthrin (TalstarOne®, FMC Corporation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and prepared fresh on each test date. Eight concentrations were tested and mortality ranged from 5 to 95%. Fresh ‘Palmetto’ St. Augustinegrass stolon sections (5.0–6.4 cm long, with 3 leaflets and 1 node) were dipped in 1 solution and air dried on wax paper (∼2 h). Ten unsexed adult B. insularis of unknown age were placed into plastic petri dishes (100 × 15 mm) containing 1 treated stolon and one 70-mm Whatman filter paper moistened with 0.5 mL of distilled water to prevent desiccation. There were 3 replicates. All tests were conducted between 1330–1500 h at room temperature (25 ± 2°C) and a 14L:10D photoperiod. The number of dead B. insularis was assessed at 72 h using a 10× dissecting microscope. Insects were scored as dead if they were on their backs or unable to walk. The JC population had reports of TalstarOne® and Permethrin-G Pro (permethrin, Gro-Pro LLC, Inverness, Florida) failures; therefore, both products were tested. Permethrin-G Pro solutions and testing were conducted as described with TalstarOne®. B. insularis population HF was used as the susceptible standard for all 2006 tests.

TABLE 1.

COLLECTION SITES, ACTIVE INGREDIENTS USED, AND THE NUMBER OF INSECTICIDE APPLICATIONS MADE TO LAWNS CONTAINING B. INSULARIS POPULATIONS IN FLORIDA IN 2006 THAT WERE TESTED FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BIFENTHRIN.

t01a_571.gif

CONTINUED

t01b_571.gif

TABLE 2.

COLLECTION SITES AND THE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS USED IN LAWNS CONTAINING B. INSULARIS POPULATIONS IN FLORIDA IN 2008 THAT WERE TESTED FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BIFENTHRIN.

t02_571.gif

2008 Bioassays

Tests were conducted using an airbrush bioassay (Vázquez 2009). A bifenthrin-susceptible laboratory population, LO (unpublished data), was used as a standard in this test. Serial dilutions were made with formulated bifenthrin (TalstarOne®); prepared fresh on each test date. Eight or 9 concentrations were tested for each population and mortality ranged from 5 to 95%. Tests were held for 24 h and insects were scored as previously described.

Statistical Analysis

The LC50 and LC90 values, 95% confidence limits (CL), slopes of the regression lines, and the likelihood ratio test to test the hypothesis of parallelism and equality of the regression lines were estimated by logit analysis using Polo Plus (LeOra Software 2002). Differences in susceptibility between populations were tested by the 95% confidence limits (CL) of lethal concentration ratios (LCRs) at LC50 and LC90 (Robertson & Priesler 1992; Robertson et al. 2007). Populations were compared to the most susceptible population (GE18) and LCR confidence intervals (95%) that did not include 1.0 were considered significant (P < 0.05) (Robertson & Priesler 1992; Robertson et al. 2007). The relationship between the number of insecticide applications made in 2006 and the respective LCRs (at LC50) was analyzed using regression analysis (Systat Software 2006).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Bifenthrin resistance in B. insularis has been confirmed in 5 Florida counties (Citrus, Escambia, Hillsborough, Orange, and Osceola), in addition to the 7 previously documented (Flagler, Hernando, Lake, Manatee, Monroe, Sarasota, and Volusia) (Cherry & Nagata 2005). Anecdotal reports of bifenthrin field failures also occurred in Alachua, Duval (E. Buss, personal communication) and Marion (E. Buss, unpublished data) counties in 2010. Reduced susceptibility to bifenthrin ranged from 4.6-736-fold in B. insularis collected in 2003 (Cherry & Nagata 2005) and increased to 45-4,099-fold (Tables 3 and 5) in B. insularis collected in 2006 and 2008.

Based on location treatment histories that reported bifenthrin field failures in 2006, the number of insecticide applications made to lawns (regardless of product) was positively correlated to their respective bifenthrin lethal concentration ratio (at LC50) values (Fig. 1). Highest bifenthrin LC50 values (3,835, 3,748 and 2,737 µg/ml) were recorded from populations P, BH, and JC, respectively (Table 3), which had been treated 8 to 11 times. Orange County population, JC, also showed resistance to permethrin at a 212.4-fold difference to the susceptible population, HF (Table 4). This is the first documented case of permethrin resistance in B. insularis. Populations treated 2 to 5 times (V, GE12, LF, FS, BP, and CT) had LC50 values ranging from 93-1,127 µg/mL for bifenthrin. Populations with 1 or no applications (DAL, DAR, HF, and GE18) had the lowest LC50 values, ranging from 0.9–42 µg/mL. LCR50 values for all populations (with the exception of DAR and HF) were significantly different from the most susceptible population, GE18, and increased with insecticide application frequency (Table 3). Thus, insecticide application frequency can, conservatively, be associated with the expression of insecticide resistance in B. insularis populations, as it is in other systems (Georghiou 1986; Rosenheim & Hoy 1986; Croft et al. 1989; He et al. 2007; Magana et al. 2007). In addition to our findings, Cherry & Nagata (2007) found select B. insularis populations to be resistant to the pyrethroids deltamethrin and λ-cyhalothrin, clearly indicating the occurrence of cross resistance in Florida. A few isolated B. insularis populations were also resistant to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid (Cherry & Nagata 2007).

LCR90 values for all populations treated with bifenthrin in our study (except DAL and DAR) significantly differed from the most susceptible population tested, GE18 (Table 3). The highest bifenthrin LCR90 values were recorded from populations BH, JC, GE12, LF, L, FS, and BP. Values indicated that these populations were 1,077–13,000 µg/mL more resistant to bifenthrin than population GE18 (Table 3). LC90 values for these same B. insularis populations ranged from 53,120 to 642,522 µg/mL, with the lowest values from populations GE18, DAR, and DAL (Table 3). Of the 11 populations collected where bifenthrin failures were reported, 9 were actual control failures (highest label rate of TalstarOne® = 209 µg/mL). Populations DAL and DAR demonstrated LC90 values that were below the recommended label rate, but control failure in these 2 sites may have been due to application error.

Fig. 1.

Bifenthrin resistance in B. insularis populations from central and northern Florida in 2006: relationship between the number of insecticide applications made (regardless of active ingredient used) and respective lethal concentration ratios (at LC50). See Table 1 for locations sampled.

f01_571.jpg

Bifenthrin LC50 values from the 6 B. insularis populations collected in central Florida in 2008 ranged from 99-366 µg/mL compared to the LC50 of 3.0 µg/mL from the susceptible laboratory population, LO (Table 5). Slopes of the regression lines from the populations tested were steep, indicating a uniform response to bifenthrin, with the exception of population PA (Georghiou & Metcalf 1961; ffrench-Constant & Roush 1990; Prabhaker et al. 1996, 2006). All B. insularis populations collected in 2008, with the exception of LO, were actual control failures, based on respective LC(50 and 90) values (Table 5).

The mechanism that has enabled B. insularis populations to repeatedly become resistant to different insecticide chemistries has not yet been determined. We speculate that the B. insularis populations collected in 2006 and 2008 consisted of a range of genetically heterogeneous (susceptible and resistant) individuals (e.g., population BH had an LC50 of 3,748 and LC90 of 642,522 µg/mL). The hypothesis tests of parallelism and equality showed that the regression lines of 13 populations were parallel (slopes did not significantly differ), but not equal (their intercepts differed significantly), to the most susceptible population, GE18 (Table 6). Alternately, the different B. insularis populations may have had qualitatively identical but quantitatively different levels of detoxification enzymes (Robertson et al. 2007). Population DAL, with a steep slope of 4.3, had significantly different intercepts and slopes from the GE18 population, possibly indicating that DAL was more uniform in structure, the insects' detoxification enzymes differed qualitatively, or that this population had entirely different detoxification enzymes (Robertson et al. 2007). Intercepts and slopes for populations DAR and GE18 were similar, demonstrating a similar response to bifenthrin.

The regression lines of the 6 populations tested in 2008 had significantly different intercepts from that of the most susceptible population LO (Table 7). The hypothesis test for parallelism was not rejected for populations JP, JH, and TG (χ2 = 0.5; df = 1; P = 0.46, χ2 = 1.5; df = 1; P = 0.21, and χ2 = 0.2; df = 1; P = 0.66, respectively). For these populations, the slopes were similar to that of population LO. Populations LU, PA, and OR had significantly different intercepts and slopes from the LO population (Table 7). Preliminary laboratory tests using one B. insularis population from Marion County have also indicated that cytochrome P450, glutathione-S-transferase, and esterase activity are all likely to be involved in B. insularis insecticide resistance development (M. Scharf, unpublished data).

TABLE 3.

RESPONSE OF FLORIDA B. INSULARIS POPULATIONS COLLECTED IN 2006 TO BIFENTHRIN AFTER 72 H USING A SPRIG-DIP BIOASSAY AT 25.5°C.

t03_571.gif

TABLE 4.

RESPONSES OF TWO FLORIDA B. INSULARIS POPULATIONS COLLECTED IN 2006 TO PERMETHRIN AFTER 72 H USING A SPRIG-DIP BIOASSAY AT 25.5°C.

t04_571.gif

TABLE 5.

RESPONSES OF FLORIDA B. INSULARIS POPULATIONS COLLECTED IN 2008 TO BIFENTHRIN AFTER 24 H USING AN AIRBRUSH BIOASSAY AT 25.5°C.

t05_571.gif

TABLE 6.

HYPOTHESIS TESTS COMPARING THE SLOPES AND INTERCEPTS OF LOGIT REGRESSION LINES FOR 15 B. INSULARIS POPULATIONS IN COMPARISON TO THE MOST SUSCEPTIBLE POPULATION, GE18, AFTER EXPOSURE TO BIFENTHRIN FOR 72 H USING A SPRIG-DIP BIOASSAY AT 25.5°C.

t06_571.gif

TABLE 7.

HYPOTHESIS TESTS COMPARING THE SLOPES AND INTERCEPTS OF LOGIT REGRESSION LINES FOR 6 B. INSULARIS POPULATIONS IN COMPARISON TO A SUSCEPTIBLE LABORATORY COLONY, LO, AFTER EXPOSURE TO BIFENTHRIN FOR 72 H USING AN AIRBRUSH BIOASSAY AT 25.5°C.

t07_571.gif

To further complicate resistance management efforts, our data support that each distinctlyowned property should be considered a separate B. insularis population. Palm Coast sites, GE12 and GE18, were located a few houses from each other, on the same side of the street, and were maintained by the same company at the time of this study GE12 received 4 insecticide applications between Jan and Jul 2006 and resulted in a bifenthrin LC50 of 1,048 µg/mL and an LC90 of 186,000 µg/mL. Lawn GE18 first had B. insularis damage in 2006 and thus had not been previously treated. GE18 showed a bifenthrin LC50 of 0.9 µg/mL and an LC90 of 49 µg/mL. Population V was located 1 street from GE12 and GE18, in the same neighborhood. Palm Coast populations V and GE12 were managed similarly, but population V had a bifenthrin LC50 of 1,127 µg/mL and an LC90 of 28,641 µg/mL. Populations FS and L were directly across the street from each other, but were maintained by different companies. The FS population was treated 3 times between Jan and Jul 2006 and its bifenthrin LC50 was 652 µg/mL and LC90 was 53,120 µg/mL. The L population, with unknown treatment history, had a bifenthrin LC50 of 521 µg/mL and an LC90 of 62,612 µg/mL.

Treatment effects on individual lawns, the effect of insect dispersal among lawns, and population dynamics of B. insularis within larger neighborhoods warrants further study Encroachment from neighboring lawns was observed in nearly all sites collected in 2006 and 2008. Other studies have suggested that insecticide resistance may develop more rapidly in small, subdivided populations rather than large ones (Wright 1931; Crow & Kimura 1970; Roush & Daly 1990). Although the immigration of susceptible individuals into treated areas can slow resistance development by increasing the frequency of susceptible alleles in a treated population (Comins 1977; Georghiou & Taylor 1977; Curtis et al. 1978; Taylor & Georghiou 1979; Tabashnik & Croft 1982; Roush & Daly 1990; Tabashnik 1990), emigration of resistant individuals from treated areas can also speed the resistance development in the untreated area (Comins 1977; Sutherst and Comins 1979). Because of the damaging nature of B. insularis in St. Augustinegrass lawns, the deliberate introduction of susceptible individuals to dilute the gene pool is not a viable resistance management option.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to R. Sheahan, P. Ruppert, and J. Cash for their assistance with collecting and sorting insects. Funding was provided by Bayer Environmental Science and FMC Corporation. M. A. Hoy and M. E. Scharf are thanked for their advice and review of earlier versions of this manuscript.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

A. H. Beyer 1924. Chinch bug control on St. Augustinegrass. Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 37: 216–219. Google Scholar

2.

M. Burton , and R. E. Hutchins 1958. Insect damage of lawns checked. Mississippi Farm Res. 21: 1–7. Google Scholar

3.

P. Busey 2003. St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze, pp. 309–330 In M. D. Casier and R. R. Duncan [eds.], Biology, breeding, and genetics of turfgrasses. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Google Scholar

4.

Buss, E. A., and Hodges, A. C. 2006. Pest management attitudes and practices of Florida superintendents and lawn care professionals. Florida Turf Digest Sept/Oct: 22–27. Google Scholar

5.

R. Cherry , and R. Nagata 2005. Development of resistance in southern chinch bugs (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) to the insecticide bifenthrin. Florida Entomol. 88: 219–221. Google Scholar

6.

R. Cherry , and R. Nagata 2007. Resistance to two classes of insecticides in southern chinch bugs (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Florida Entomol. 90: 431–434. Google Scholar

7.

H. N. Comins 1977. The development of insecticide resistance in the presence of immigration. J. Theor. Biol. 64: 177–197. Google Scholar

8.

R. L. Crocker 1993. Chemical control of southern chinch bug in St. Augustinegrass. Int. Turf. Soc. Res. J. 7: 358–365. Google Scholar

9.

B. A. Croft , E. C. Burts , H. E. van de Baan , P. H. Westigard , and H. W. Riedl 1989. Local and regional resistance to fenvalerate in Psylla pyricola Foerster (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in western North America. Can. Entomol. 121: 121–129. Google Scholar

10.

J. F. Crow , and M. Kimura 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York, New York. Google Scholar

11.

C. F. Curtis , L. M. Cook , and R. J. Wood 1978. Selection for and against insecticide resistance and possible methods of inhibiting the evolution of resistance in mosquitoes. Ecol. Entomol. 3: 273–287. Google Scholar

12.

R. H. Ffrench-Constant and R. T. Roush 1990. Resistance detection and documentation: The relative roles of pesticidal and biochemical assays, pp. 4–57 In R. T. Roush and B. E. Tabashnik [eds.], Pesticide resistance in arthropods. Chapman and Hall, New York. Google Scholar

13.

G. P. Georghiou 1986. The magnitude of the resistance problem, pp. 14–43 In E. H. Glass [ed.], Pesticide resistance: strategies and tactics for management. Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

14.

G. P. Georghiou , and R. L. Metcalf 1961. A bioassay method and results of laboratory evaluation of insecticides against adult mosquitoes. Mosq. News 21: 328–337. Google Scholar

15.

G. P. Georghiou , and C. E. Taylor 1977. Genetic and biological influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance. J. Econ. Entomol. 70: 319–323. Google Scholar

16.

Y. P. He , C. F. Gao , M. Z. Cao , W. M. Chen , L. Q. Huang , W. J. Zhou , X. G. Liu , J. L. Shen , and Y. C. Zhu 2007. Survey of susceptibilities to monosultap, triazophos, fipronil, and abamectin in Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 1854–1861. Google Scholar

17.

A. W. Hodges , J. J. Haydu , P. J. van Blokland , and A. P. Bell 1994. Contribution of the turfgrass industry to Florida's economy, 1991–92: A value-added approach. Economics Report ER 94-1, Food and Res. Econ. Dept., IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville. Google Scholar

18.

E. G. Kelsheimer and S. H. Kerr 1957. Insects and other pests of lawns and turf. Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Cir. 5–96: 2–5. Google Scholar

19.

S. H. Kerr 1958. Tests on chinch bugs and the current status of controls. Proc. Florida Hortic. Soc. 71: 400–403. Google Scholar

20.

S. H. Kerr 1961. Lawn chinch bug research. Proc. Univ. Florida Turf. Manag. Conf. 9: 211–221. Google Scholar

21.

S. H. Kerr 1966. Biology of the lawn chinch bug, Blissus insularis. Florida Entomol. 49: 9–18. Google Scholar

22.

S. H. Kerr , and L. C. Kuitert 1955. Biology and control of insect and arachnid pests of turf grasses. Florida Agric. Exp. Stn. Ann. Rep. 101–102. Google Scholar

23.

S. H. Kerr , and F. Robinson 1958. Chinch bug control tests, 1956-57. Florida Entomol. 41: 97–101. Google Scholar

24.

D. E. Leonard 1966. Biosystematics of the Leucopterus complex of the genus Blissus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 677. Google Scholar

25.

LEORA SOFTWARE. 2002. PoloPlus: Probit and Logit Analysis. LeOra Software, Berkeley, California. Google Scholar

26.

P. Magana , P. Hernandez-Crespo , F. Ortego , and P. Castanera 2007. Resistance to malathion in field populations of Ceratitis capitata. J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 1836–1843. Google Scholar

27.

R. A. McGregor 1976. Florida turfgrass survey, 1974. Florida Crop Livestock Rep. Serv. 33 pp. Google Scholar

28.

R. T. Nagata , and R. H. Cherry 1999. Survival of different life stages of the southern chinch bug (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) following insecticidal applications. J. Entomol. Sci. 34: 126–131. Google Scholar

29.

J. F. Negron , and T. J. Riley 1990. Long-term effects of chinch bug (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) feeding on corn. J. Econ. Entomol. 83: 618–620. Google Scholar

30.

R. H. Painter 1928. Notes on the injury to plant cells in chinch bug feeding. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 21: 232–241. Google Scholar

31.

N. Prabhaker , N. C. Toscano , T. J. Henneberry , S. J. Castle , and D. Weddle 1996. Assessment of two bioassay techniques for resistance monitoring of silverleaf whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in California. J. Econ. Entomol. 89: 805–815. Google Scholar

32.

N. Prabhaker , S. Castle , F. Byrne , T. J. Henneberry , and N. C. Toscano 2006. Establishment of baseline susceptibility to various insecticides for Homalodisca coagulata (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) by comparative bioassay techniques. J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 141–154. Google Scholar

33.

M. Rangasamy , B. Rathinasabapathi , H. J. McAuslane , R. H. Cherry , and R. T. Nagata 2009. Role of leaf sheath lignifications and anatomy in resistance against southern chinch bug (Hemiptera: Blissidae) in St. Augustinegrass. J. Econ. Entomol. 102: 432–439. Google Scholar

34.

J. A. Reinert 1978. Antibiosis to the southern chinch bug by St. Augustine grass accessions. J. Econ. Entomol. 71: 21–24. Google Scholar

35.

J. A. Reinert 1982a. Insecticide resistance in epigeal insect pests of turfgrass. I. A review, pp. 71–76 In H. D. Niemczyk and B. G. Joyner [eds.], Advances in turfgrass entomology. Hammer Graphics, Piqua, Ohio. Google Scholar

36.

J. A. Reinert 1982b. Carbamate and synthetic pyrethroid insecticides for control of organophosphate-resistant southern chinch bugs (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 75: 716–718. Google Scholar

37.

J. A. Reinert , and S. H. Kerr 1973. Bionomics and control of lawn chinch bug. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 19: 91–92. Google Scholar

38.

J. A. Reinert , and H. D. Niemczyk 1982. Insecticide resistance in epigeal insect pests of turfgrass. II. Southern chinch bug resistance to organophosphates in Florida, pp. 77–80 In H. D. Niemczyk and B. G. Joyner [eds.], Advances in turfgrass entomology. Hammer Graphics, Piqua, Ohio. Google Scholar

39.

J. A. Reinert , and K. Portier 1983. Distribution and characterization of organophosphate-resistant southern chinch bugs (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) in Florida. J. Econ. Entomol. 76: 1187–1190. Google Scholar

40.

J. R. Robertson , and H. K. Preisler 1992. Pesticide Bioassays with Arthropods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. Google Scholar

41.

J. R. Robertson , R. M. Russell , H. K. Preisler , and N. W. Savin 2007. Bioassays with Arthropods, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. Google Scholar

42.

J. A. Rosenheim , and M. A. Hoy 1986. Intraspecific variation in levels of pesticide resistance in field populations of a parasitoid, Aphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): The role of past selection pressures. J. Econ. Entomol. 79: 1161–1173. Google Scholar

43.

R. T. Roush , and J. C. Daly 1990. The role of population genetics in resistance research and management, pp. 97–152 In R. T. Roush and B. E. Tabashnik [eds.], Pesticide resistance in arthropods. Chapman and Hall, New York. Google Scholar

44.

J. D. Sauer 1972. Revision of Stenotaphrum (Gramineae: Paniceae) with attention to its historical geography. Brittonia 24: 202–222. Google Scholar

45.

B. P. Spike , R. J. Wright , S. Danielson , and D. W. Stanley-Samuelson 1991. The fatty acid compositions of phospholipids and triacylglycerols from two chinch bug species Blissus leucopterus leucopterus and Blissus iowensis (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) are similar in the characteristic dipteran pattern. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. 99: 799–802. Google Scholar

46.

T. L. Stringfellow 1967. Studies on turfgrass insect control in south Florida. Proc. Florida State Hortic. Soc. 80: 486–491. Google Scholar

47.

T. L. Stringfellow 1968. Studies on turfgrass insect control in south Florida. Proc. Florida State Hortic. Soc. 81: 447–454. Google Scholar

48.

T. L. Stringfellow 1969. Turfgrass insect research in Florida, pp. 19–33 In H. T. Streu and R. T. Bangs [eds.], Proc. Scott's Turfgrass Research Conference. O. M. Scott and Sons, Marysville, Ohio. Google Scholar

49.

J. Strobel 1971. Turfgrass: A prospectus developed by the Ornamental Horticulture Department. Proc. Florida Turfgrass Manage. Conf. 19: 19–28. Google Scholar

50.

R.W. Sutherst , and H. N. Comins 1979. The management of acaricide resistance in the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acari: Ixodidae), in Australia. Bull. Entomol. Res. 69: 519–537. Google Scholar

51.

M. H. Sweet 2000. Seed and chinch bug (Lygaeoidea), pp. 143–264 In C. W. Schaefer and A. R. Paninzzi [eds.], Heteroptera of economic importance. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida. Google Scholar

52.

SYSTAT SOFTWARE, INC. 2006. SigmaPlot 10 User's Manual. Systat Software, Inc., Port Richmond, California. Google Scholar

53.

B. E. Tabashnik 1990. Modeling and evaluation of resistance management tactics, pp. 153–182 In R. T. Roush and B. E. Tabashnik [eds.], Pesticide resistance in arthropods. Chapman and Hall, New York. Google Scholar

54.

B. E. Tabashnik , and B. A. Croft 1982. Managing pesticide resistance in crop-arthropod complexes: interactions between biological and operational factors. Environ. Entomol. 11: 1137–1144. Google Scholar

55.

H. Tashiro 1987. Turfgrass Insects of the United States and Canada. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar

56.

C. E. Taylor , and G. P. Georghiou 1979. Suppression of insecticide resistance by alteration of gene dominance and migration. J. Econ. Entomol. 72: 105–109. Google Scholar

57.

J. C. Vázquez 2009. Initial steps for developing a resistance management program for the southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis Barber. Ph.D. dissertation University of Florida, Florida. Google Scholar

58.

J. C. Vázquez , and E. A. Buss 2006. Southern chinch bug feeding impact on St. Augustinegrass growth under different irrigation regimes. Appl. Turgrass Sci.  http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/sub/ats/research/2006/chinch/. pp. 1–5. Google Scholar

59.

J. C. Vázquez , M. A. HOY , R. N. Royalty , and E. A. Buss 2010. A synchronous rearing method for Blissus insularis (Hemiptera: Blissidae). J. Econ. Entomol 103(3): 726–734. Google Scholar

60.

S. Wright 1931. Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159. Google Scholar

61.

D. O. Wolfenbarger 1953. Insect and mite control problems on lawn and golf grasses. Florida Entomol. 36: 9–12. Google Scholar
Cara Vázquez, Reed N. Royalty, and Eileen A. Buss "Susceptibility of Blissus insularis (Heteroptera: Hemiptera: Blissidae) Populations in Florida to Bifenthrin and Permethrin," Florida Entomologist 94(3), 571-581, (1 September 2011). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0322
Published: 1 September 2011
KEYWORDS
Blissus insularis
insecticide resistance
pyrethroids
Back to Top