Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2012 An Experimental Test of the Seismic Behaviors of Antispila Nysaefoliella (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae) to Vibrational Stimuli
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study tested the sensitivity of the tupelo leafminer, Antispila nysaefoliella, to vibrational cues and whether their unique behaviors, first reported by Low (2008), may be elicited by the frequencies matching those of parasitic wasps. In the tick behavior, a larva ticks its abdomen back and forth rhythmically, and in the rattle behavior, the larva rattles its abdomen in short rapid pulses. To test the specificity of these behaviors to vibrational cues, computer-generated signals of pure tone frequencies ranging from 1–6 kHz were played to the entire leaf of solitary larvae through airborne signal transmission. The experiment demonstrated that the larvae of A. nysaefoliella responded to all frequencies with wriggling movements, but ticked only in response to the frequencies that matched those generated by parasitoid probing activity. Rattling behavior was rarely elicited.

Vibrational cueing may be critical in mediating the interactions between leaf-mining insects and their parasitoids (Meyhöfer et al. 1997). Some leaf-mining species detect the vibrations that are released by parasitoids searching at the leaf surface, then wriggle within their mines to evade attack (Meyhöfer et al. 1994; Bacher et al. 1996; Meyhöfer & Casas 1999). Vibrations produced by wriggling can reduce the time that a parasitoid spends at a leaf before terminating its search; and thus, reduces parasitism risk. Low (2008) reported that in the tupelo leafminer, Antispila nysaefoliella (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae), vibrations are not produced incidentally, but directly through the actions of unique behaviors in association with specialized morphology (sclerotized ridges and bumps).

The reported “seismic” behaviors of A. nysaefoliella may be an evolutionary elaboration of the wriggling observed in other species for producing defensive vibrations. Based on known interactions between hosts and parasitoids, substrate vibrations that are emitted by the host can interfere with parasitoid search cues or signal unprofitability (high search and handling costs) to parasitoids (Djemai et al. 2004). Conversely, the parasitoids that hunt for concealed prey also release vibrations that provide information for the leafminer that is hiding inside its mine (Meyhöfer et al. 1994; Bacher et al. 1996; Meyhöfer & Casas 1999). Therefore, if the ticking and rattling behaviors of A. nysaefoliella have evolved for a defensive function and in response to parasitic wasps, then these should be tuned to the vibrations that characterize potential danger, such as the activity of a parasitoid searching at the leaf surface.

To test if A. nysaefoliella larvae are indeed tuned to the vibrations of their parasitoids, I conducted a playback experiment using digitally produced puretone signals of 1–6 kHz, which spanned the range of dominant frequencies reported for the probing activity of Sympiesis sericeicornis Nees (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on leaves for the spotted tentiform leafminer, Phyllonorycter malella (Gerasimov) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) (Bacher et al. 1996). The parasitoids that attack A. nysaefoliella are likely to produce similar cues to Sympiesis sericeicornis because they are congener species that are also similar in body size and behavior (e.g., Pnigalio sp. and Closterocerus sp.). Bacher et al. (1996) concluded that the dominant frequencies from probing (insertion of ovipositor into mine) were the most consistent at 2–3kHz, and thus would provide the most reliable information for a leafminer to detect an attacking parasitoid. In this study I ask: do these specific frequencies elicit the ticking or rattling behaviors in A. nysaefoliella?

MATERIALS and METHODS

Study System

The tupelo leafminer, A. nysaefoliella, is a specialist of blackgum, Nyssa sylvatica Marsh (Cornales: Nyssaceae), and the population used for this study was located within a mixed deciduous forest in Clarke County, Virginia, USA. In a previous study by Low (2008), 2 seismic behaviors were described and named “tick” and “rattle” for the audible sounds that they produce. The tick behavior is characterized by a rhythmic movement of the abdomen back and forth like a pendulum, and the rattle is a rapid pulse of the caudal segment. The rattle behavior is similar to the rattle of a rattlesnake (Crotalus sp.; Squamata: Viperidae) in both movement and auditory cues. Ticks are rhythmic and can last for several minutes, whereas rattles are quick rapid bursts that last only fractions of a second. Videos of the behavior can be viewed at the Infolink for supplementary files for Low (2008),  http://www.fcla.edu/FlaEnt/fe91p604i.htm.

Playback Experiment

Each playback trial sequence was composed of 18 stimuli (6 frequencies at 3 amplitudes) generated using MatLab (v. 6.5 Mathworks), which were played through a stereo speaker (Pignose Model 7-100R) from a laptop computer in random order to individual larvae (N = 89). The speaker was set 20 cm away from the front of a leaf that was held in place and upright by inserting the petiole into a floral “oasis” cube, which was partially submerged in a dish of water. Each trial began when the larva stayed motionless for at least 10 min. Each stimulus recording was preceded by a 30-s silent period, and then played for 30 s. I recorded all larval activity during the experimental trials using a digital video camera (set on a tripod) and scored all behavioral responses using the video recordings after the experiment was completed. The entire experiment occurred over 6 d inside a laboratory room (∼25 ° C), and leaves were collected fresh from the field each d during 15–21 Aug 2002. Each experimental leaf contained only a single larva (and mine). Mines were approximately 0.8 ± 0.4 cm in diam (mean ± 1 SD).

The proportion of individuals that did not change their behavior when the signal was played (either started or stopped moving) was tested against the null proportion of 0.62 in a 2-tailed binomial test. This null value was calculated from the pooled number of “no change” responses (972 out of 1579), which is also equivalent to the average proportion across tests. Statistical significance was set at a P-value of 0.0194 by calculation of the false discovery rate for multiple comparisons (Benjamini & Hochberg 1995).

Fig. 1.

The responses of larvae to playback stimuli. Behavioral transitions are defined as going from stillness during the control period to movement during the signal stimulus (“0 to 1”), and the opposite if the larva was moving during the signal, but then stopped its behavior.

f01_16.jpg

TABLE 1.

BEHAVIORAL TRANSITIONS DURING THE SOUND PLAYBACK EXPERIMENT OF 6 PURE-TONE FREQUENCIES AT 3 RELATIVE AMPLITUDES.

t01_16.gif

RESULTS

In the experimental trials, all individuals wriggled at least once, 45% ticked, 17% ticked and rattled, and 6% rattled. The transitions in behavior from the control state were predominately from stillness to movement (by wriggling, ticking, or rattling) (Fig. 1). In general, larvae responded to all frequencies at various amplitudes by wriggling, suggesting that they sensed the vibrations (Table 1). However, they responded by ticking most often to frequencies at 2–3 kHz (Fig. 2), which corresponds with the dominant signal frequencies of probing behavior by the parasitoid Sympiesis sericeicornis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae, see Djemai et al. 2001). The number of observations of ticking (y) against frequency (x) can be predicted by the model: y = 8.27x2 - 4.19x + 1.72 (R2 = 0.34, df = 15, F = 3.89, P = 0.044; Fig. 2, bottom panel). In general, observations of the rattle behavior were too infrequent to draw any conclusions about its context or function.

DISCUSSION

The experimental results suggest that A. nysaefoliella can sense vibrations in general, but respond with specialized ticking behavior to the vibrational cues that fall within the frequency range of parasitoids. Larvae responded with slight movements (wriggling) to all frequencies tested (1–6 kHz), which suggests that they sensed all signals but ticked most often in response to the dominant frequencies of parasitoid probing behavior (2–3 kHz) (Djemai et al. 2001). Because many of the parasitoids of blotch miners (e.g., A. nysaefoliella and P. malella) tend to be species generalists (but blotch specialists), this frequency range is most likely to be biologically relevant for interpreting the results of this experiment (Krombein et al. 1979; Gates et al. 2002).

The use of pure-tone signals may be adequate for isolating the frequency component of natural signals for playback, because airborne pure-tone (insect) sounds tend to propagate more accurately, and the characteristics of insect sounds and vibrations tend to be low frequency, pure-tone signals (Bennet-Clark 1998; Cocroft & Rodriguez 2005). Moreover, the thin mine epidermis is the only barrier between the larva and the external environment, and therefore, the signal received by the leafminer (via sensory hairs, Low 2008) would be minimally filtered or distorted. In contrast, signal attenuation and distortion is more likely across a leaf surface because of the differences in density (Cocroft et al. 2006).

The seismic behaviors observed for A. nysaefoliella provides the first hint at active signaling by a leafminer and extends the findings of many other studies that point to importance of vibrational communication in animal systems - that go beyond mate recogntion and conspecific communication (Hill 2009 and references therein). In signaling behavior, there is an intent to send information to the receiver, which then alters the receiver's behavior and increases the signaler's fitness (Bradbury & Vehrencamp 1998; Maynard-Smith & Harper 2004). Previous studies on leafminer cues (not signals) have found that parasitoids do indeed change their behavior because of the vibrational cues emitted by leafmining larvae (Djemai et al. 2004). As a consequence, the reduction in risk associated with vibration production may set the stage for intentional signals that communicate information to the parasitoid about the host's condition, such as difficulty of capture.

Fig. 2.

Results of the playback experiment where each individual (N = 89) was tested for responses to 18 different stimuli (6 frequencies, 3 amplitudes). Each bar represents the total number of vibration-generating responses: wriggles, ticks, and rattles. In the top panel, each bar represents the total number of individuals that wriggled, divided into wriggling without (Wr) and wriggling with (Wr+) displacement. In the bottom panel, each bar represents the total number of individuals that responded by ticking only (T), rattling only (R), and both ticking and rattling (T + R). These data represent the positive responses (change in behavior) from Table 1 pooled across all amplitudes. These data represent only the “0 to 1” behavioral transitions from Fig. 1.

f02_16.jpg

This study was only the first step towards understanding the adaptive significance of vibration production in A. nysaefoliella. Some alternative hypotheses for the function of the seismic behaviors are: individual defense against parasitoids, social (territorial or agonistic) communication, or warning conspecifics about the presence of parasitoids (via kin selection). Future work should test multiple hypotheses and determine the importance of vibrational signaling, in general, for mediating host-parasitoid interactions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank John Endler and Gregg Tully for advice on this project. The Professor Hering Memorial Research Fund (British Entomological and Natural History Society) and Blandy Experimental Farm (University of Virginia) provided funds and logistical support. Stonebridge Farm permitted use of their property for collecting larvae.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

S. Bacher , J. Casas , and S. Dorn . 1996. Parasitoid vibrations as potential releasing stimulus of evasive behaviour in a leafminer. Physiol. Entomol. 21: 33–43. Google Scholar

2.

S. Bacher , J. Casas , and S. Dorn . 1996. Parasitoid vibrations as potential releasing stimulus of evasive behaviour in a leafminer. Physiol. Entomol. 21: 33–43. Google Scholar

3.

Y. Benjamini , and Y. Hochberg . 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Royal Statistical Soc. B 57: 289–300. Google Scholar

4.

H. C. Bennet-Clark 1998. Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London Ser. B-Biological Sciences 353: 407–419. Google Scholar

5.

J. W. Bradbury, and S. L. Vehrenkamp . 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 822 pp. Google Scholar

6.

R. B. Cocroft, H. J. Shugart , K. T. Konrad , and K. Tibbs . 2006. Variation in plant substrates and its consequences for insect vibrational communication. Ethology 112: 779–789. Google Scholar

7.

R. B. Cocroft, and R. L. Rodriguez . 2005. The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. Bioscience 55: 323–334. Google Scholar

8.

I. Djemai , J. Casas , and C. Magal . 2001. Matching host reactions to parasitoid wasp vibrations. Proc. Royal Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 268: 2403–2408. Google Scholar

9.

I. Djemai , J. Casas , and C. Magal . 2004. Parasitoid foraging decisions mediated by artificial vibrations. Anim. Behav. 67: 567–571. Google Scholar

10.

M. W. Gates , J. M. Heraty, M. E. Schauff , D. L. Wagner , J. B. Whitfield , and D. B. Wahl . 2002. Survey of the parasitic hymenoptera on leafminers in California. J. Hymenoptera Res. 11: 213–270. Google Scholar

11.

P. S. M. Hill 2009. How do animals use substrateborne vibrations as an information source? Naturwissenschaften 96: 1355–1371. Google Scholar

12.

H. Hoch , J. Deckert , and A. Wessel . 2006. Vibrational signalling in a Gondwanan relict insect (Hemiptera: Coleorrhyncha : Peloridiidae). Biol. Letters 2: 222–224. Google Scholar

13.

K. V. Krombein , J. P. D. Hurd , and D. R. Smith . 1979. Catalog of Hymnoptera in America North of Mexico. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

14.

C. Low 2008. Seismic behaviors of a leafminer, Antispila nysaefoliella (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae). Florida Entomol. 91: 604–609. Google Scholar

15.

J. Maynard-Smith , and D. Harper . 2004. Animal Signals. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

16.

R. Meyhöfer , and J. Casas . 1999. Vibratory stimuli in host location by parasitic wasps. J. Insect Physiol. 45: 967–971. Google Scholar

17.

R. Meyhöfer , J. Casas , and S. Dorn . 1994. Host location by a parasitoid using leafminer vibrations: Characterizing the vibrational signals produced by the leaf-mining host. Physiol. Entomol. 19: 349–359. Google Scholar

18.

R. Meyhöfer , J. Casas , and S. Dorn . 1997. Vibrationmediated interactions in a host-parasitoid system. Proc. Royal Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sciences 264: 261–266. Google Scholar

19.

R. L. Rodriguez , L. E. Sullivan , and R. B. Cocroft . 2004. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera : Membracidae). Evolution 58:571–578. Google Scholar
Candace Low "An Experimental Test of the Seismic Behaviors of Antispila Nysaefoliella (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae) to Vibrational Stimuli," Florida Entomologist 95(1), 16-20, (1 March 2012). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0103
Published: 1 March 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top