Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2012 Mitochondrial DNA Genetic Diversity of the Drywood Termites Incisitermes minor and I. snyderi (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The western drywood termite, Incisitermes minor (Hagen) and the light southern drywood termite I. snyderi (Light) are common drywood termites in southwestern and the southern United States, respectively. Despite the economic importance of these 2 species, no information exists on the mitochondrial genetic diversity of I. minor and I. snyderi. A molecular genetics study involving DNA sequencing of a portion of the mitochondrial DNA 16S rRNA gene was undertaken to determine the extent of genetic variation in I. minor and I. snyderi. A total of 12 haplotypes were observed for I. minor collected from Florida, Oregon, Arizona, Texas, Utah, and California. For I. snyderi, a total of 10 haplotypes were observed from the Bahamas, Florida, Georgia, and Texas. Genetic variation among I. minor haplotypes ranged from 0.7 to 3.7% and variation for I. snyderi ranged from 0.7 to 2.4%. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood analysis revealed 3 distinct clades for I. snyderi, whereas, I. minor had 2 distinct clades. This is the first study on mitochondrial genetic variation of the drywood termites I. minor and I. snyderi. There appears to be enough genetic variation within these 2 species for a molecular phylogeographic study, which may provide insight into dispersal and introductions of these species.

The 2 most widespread species of drywood termites (Kalotermitidae) in the United States are the southeastern drywood termite, Incisitermes snyderi (Light) and the western drywood termite, I. minor (Hagen). Both species are endemic to the southern Nearctic region. Incisitermes snyderi is the only endemic drywood termite in southeastern United States that commonly infests structures (Scheffrahn et al. 1988). The natural range of I. snyderi extends from Monterrey, Mexico (RHS, unpublished) north and east to coastal North Carolina (Ebeling 1978) and southeast into the Bahamas archipelago (Scheffrahn et al. 2006). Incisitermes minor is the most common structure-infesting drywood termite in the western United States (Su & Scheffrahn 1990). The natural range of I. minor extends along the California coast from Mendocino County inland to the Sierra Nevada foothills and south into Baja California and Guaymas, Sonora, Mexico (Light 1934). The natural latitudinal distribution of I. minor roughly follows the U.S.-Mexico border from its epicenter in southern California east to Brewster County, Texas (new easternmost record). Riparian communities in the canyons formed by the Colorado and Virgin Rivers and their tributaries allow I. minor's, natural range to reach into northern Arizona and southern Utah, an observation noted by others (Jones 2004). The many records outside this range, including some localities studied herein, should be considered anthropogenic introductions.

Introductions of I. minor from movement of infested wooden timbers and other wooden products have been documented in Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Ohio, Texas, and Washington State (Krishna & Weesner 1969; Snyder 1954); a heavily infested structure was reported in Toronto, Canada (Grace et al. 1991). Incisitermes minor has been found in Georgia (Scheffrahn et al. 2001), South Carolina (Hathorne et al. 2000) and Louisiana (Messenger et al. 2000). The latter is significant because I. minor was taken from a park tree in New Orleans indicating that it can survive outdoors in non-arid, subtropical climates. In southern California yachts, sailboats, and small pleasure craft harboring mature colonies may serve as floating sources of introduction outside I. minor's native range as they set sail for ports of call around the world. Twelve shipborne infestations of I. minor were recorded in Florida and Australia onboard yachts, some of which were known to have spent time in California (Scheffrahn & Crowe 2011). This has been the theme for many termite species over the past few years, including Heterotermes (Szalanski et al. 2004), Coptotermes (Austin et al. 2006, Scheffrahn et al. 2004), Reticulitermes (Austin et al. 2005), Nasutitermes (Scheffrahan et al. 2005a, 2005b), Cryptotermes (Scheffrahn et al. 2008), and others (Scheffrahn & Crowe 2011).

There is more restricted information existing on Incisitermes species occupation outside its known range, because in most instances, it appears that infestations did not lead to successful colonization flights with the exception of I. minor populations in Japan (Yoshimura et al. 2004). This fact may be associated with the difficulties in general for establishment from social insects such as termites, and because of the time required to establish colony maturity (Harvey 1942). Many infestations are more quickly identified and often eliminated due to the fact that some termites such as I. minor frequently try to establish colonies from easily accessed cracks, taking advantage of the shelter to establish copulariums and possessing relatively slow egg-laying rates (Harvey 1934). These access points may likewise be located and inspected by Pest Management Professionals (PMPs) that may attempt control measures or simply destroy the infested materials.

Introductions of I. snyderi are less well documented, indicating that this species is not as subject to transport and survival in new localities as is I. minor (Krishna & Weesner 1970, Scheffrahn & 12010). These subtle differences in establishment capability might infer that somehow I. minor could possibly possess greater reproductive and/or physiologically distinct capabilities to afford broader geographic distributions when compared to I. synderi (e.g. improved desiccation protection or water relations, etc.). As behavioral and physiological distinctiveness can be associated with unique phenotypes for each species, a genetic perspective might be useful to understand if the variability would be greater among I. minor populations than I. snyderi populations. One would generally anticipate greater genetic plasticity among populations that can occupy more variable geographic locations beyond their respective indigenous zones of habitation (Matsuura et al. 2009).

Genetic diversity studies can provide information on the dispersal of a species, enhance molecular diagnostics, and may help with identifying locally adapted populations. Previous studies on genetic diversity of these 2 species are limited to a microsatellite study by Booth et al. (2008) on six populations of I. minor from California and another study by Indrayani et al. (2006) on I. minor microsatellite diversity in Japan. No studies have even been conducted on genetic diversity of I. snyderi, and I. minor evaluations are limited to only California and Japan. The objective of this study was to determine the extent of genetic diversity of a mitochondrial DNA(mtDNA) 16S rRNA marker for populations of I. minor and I. snyderi in the US and the Bahamas.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Collected termites were preserved in 100% ethanol. Collected Incisitermes samples were identified using morphological characters described in the keys of Scheffrahn & Su (1994). Voucher specimens preserved in 100% ethanol are maintained at the Arthropod Museum, Department of Entomology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.

Alcohol-preserved specimens were allowed to dry on filter paper, and DNA was extracted according to Liu & Beckenbach (1992) on individual worker termites with the Puregene DNA isolation kit D-5000A (Gentra, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Extracted DNA was resuspended in 50 mL of Tris:EDTA and stored at -20 °C. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of a 428bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was conducted using the primers LR-J-13007 forward: 5′-TTA CGC TGT TAT CCC TAA-3′ (Kambhampati & Smith 1995) and LR-N-13398 reverse: 5′-CGC CTG TTT ATC AAA AAC AT-3′ (Simon et al. 1994).

The PCR reactions were conducted with 1 mL of the extracted DNA (Szalanski et al. 2000), having a profile consisting of 35 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 46 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 60 s. Amplified DNA from individual termites was purified and concentrated with Microcon PCR centrifugal filter devices (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were sent to the DNA core sequencing facility at The University of Arkansas Medical, Little Rock for direct sequencing in both directions. GenBank accession numbers are HM542448 to HM542468 for the new haplotypes found in this study. DNA sequences were aligned using BioEdit v5.89 (Hall 1999) and adjusted manually. Mitochondrial DNA haplotypes were aligned using MacClade v4 (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts). Genealogical relationships among haplotypes were constructed using TCS (Clement et al. 2000).

The distance matrix option of PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2001) was used to calculate genetic distances according to the Kimura 2-parameter model of sequence evolution (Kimura 1980). Additional mitochondrial 16S GenBank sequences from I. schwarzi Banks, and I. banksi (Snyder) were added to the dataset along with DNA sequences from Glyptotermes nakajimai Morimoto (GenBank AB036689), Calcaritermes temnocephalus (Silvestri) (GenBank EU253743), and Kalotermes flavicollis (Fabr.) (GenBank AY486437) which were added to act as outgroup taxa. DNA sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al. 1994). Maximum parsimony analysis on the alignments was conducted using PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2001). Gaps were treated as missing characters for all analysis. The reliability of trees was tested with a bootstrap test (Felsenstein 1985). Parsimony bootstrap analysis included 1,000 resamplings using the Branch and Bound algorithm of PAUP*.

TABLE 1.

COLLECTION DATA, HAPLOTYPES AND NUMBER OF SAMPLES FOR INCISITERMES MINOR AND INCISITERMES SNYDERI.

t01_75.gif

For Bayesian analysis, the best-fitting nucleotide substitution model was chosen according to the general time reversible + gamma (GTR+G) model among 64 different models using the ModelTest v 3.7 (Posada & Crandall 1998) and PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2001) programs. Phylogenetic trees were obtained using Bayesian inference with the GTR+G model using Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis Sampling Trees (BEAST) v1.4.2 software (Drummond & Rambaut 2003). For Bayesian inference, 4 Markov chains run for 106 generations with a burn-in of 2 × 104 were used to reconstruct the consensus tree.

RESULTS and DISCUSSION

A total of 12 haplotypes were observed for I. minor and 10 for I. snyderi (Tables 1 and 2). For I. minor, haplotype IM1 was the most common haplotype and also had the widest distribution (California, Georgia, Hawaii, Oregon and Utah); Haplotypes IM2, IM3 and IM4 occurred 2 times each and the remainder of the I. minor haplotypes were singletons. With I. snyderi, haplotype IS4 was the most common (n = 3), followed by IS7 (n = 2), and the remaining 8 haplotypes were singletons. Of the 3 I. snyderi haplotypes observed in the Bahamas, 2 haplotypes were not found in the United States (haplotypes IS1 and IS9), while haplotype IS7 was also observed in Florida. Genetic variation for I. minor ranged from 0.7 to 3.7% and from 0.7 to 2.4% for I. snyderi. Because of the limited number of locations to consider for genetic evaluation, it is difficult to ascertain if there is any statistical difference in the degree of genetic variation observed for respective species in the present study. How do these differences account for geographical dissemination potential of respective species? As hypothesized, I. minor possessed slightly greater genetic variability than I. snyderi, but additional sampling from more disparate locations may afford greater clarification of this point. An equally plausible explanation for the dispersal capability of I. minor vs. I. snyderi, which doesn't constitute a need or rationale for greater genetic variability, lies in the endemic origin of the species. Examples from other termite species mentioned earlier in this paper present ample evidence to this point. Future genetic studies which include broader sampling will likely assist with this question. The greatest number of I. minor structural infestations occur in Southern California (RHS unpubl. obs.), with occasional surprises such as populations recently recovered in Southern New Mexico (JWA unpubl.). Therefore, the southern California haplotype, IM1, may posit the greatest capability to undergo anthropogenic dispersal, from the populations evaluated in the present study.

TABLE 2.

INCISITERMES MINOR AND INCISITERMES SNYDERI HAPLOTYPES.

t02_75.gif

Fig. 1.

Bayesian phylogenetic relationships of Incisitermes mtDNA 16S sequences. Posterior bootstrap values are provided at each node, and maximum parsimony (MP) bootstrap values (> 75) are provided in parenthesis.

f01_75.jpg

Fig. 2.

Genealogical relationships among Incisitermes minor 16S haplotypes estimated by TCS (Clement et al. 2000). State or country (Bahamas) locations are provided for each haplotype. A unit branch represents one mutation and small ovals indicate genotypes that were not observed.

f02_75.jpg

Of the 477 characters used for the phylogenetic analysis, a total of 99 characters (21%) were parsimony informative. The maximum parsimony analysis resulted in a tree of a length of 293 and a confidence index value of 0.741. Incisitermes minor and I. snyderi were both monophyletic (Fig. 1). Both phylogenetic and TCS analysis revealed several distinct clades within I. minor: haplotypes IM1 and IM2 from California and Texas; I. minor AB036685 from Japan with IM3 from Utah and IM5, IM7-9 from Arizona and Texas (Figs. 2 and 3). For I. snyderi haplotype IS5 (Texas) was the most distal and formed a distinct clade. Haplotypes IS4 (Texas, Florida), IS6 (Georgia) and IS7 (Florida, Bahamas) formed a distinct clade relative to the other I. snyderi haplotypes. If you divide the I. minor samples into those collected within their endemic range (defined earlier) with those collected outside this range, you will see that many outside the range fall within the IM1 haplotype. The clade (from Fig. 1) in our phylogenetic tree containing IM1 also contains most of the samples collected outside the natural endemic range including Georgia Hawaii, Louisiana, Oregon, and Florida. The relative ease of intra-continental travel and commerce, coupled with the fact that infested wood can be easily transported, has resulted in isolated occurrences of I. minor infestations throughout the United States (Cabrera & Scheffrahn 2005), and the occurrences of specimens evaluated in the current study are no exception. The second clade (also Fig. 1) which includes I. minor from Arizona and Texas specimens, implies native geographical affinities. There is no clear explanation for the position of the Japan and Tulare haplotype except to say that Tulare County, California has native I. minor, and a large forest products industry from which Japan imports large quantities of products. It is speculation at best to assume infested materials were brought to Japan, but at least this is 1 plausible explanation for this occurrence in the present study.

Fig. 3.

Genealogical relationships among Incisitermes snyderi 16S haplotypes estimated by TCS (Clement et al. 2000). State or country (Bahamas) locations are provided for each haplotype. A unit branch represents one mutation and small ovals indicate genotypes that were not observed.

f03_75.jpg

Incisitermes snyderi haplotypes show no apparent geographic patterns. Most specimens of I. snyderi samples taken from collections used in the present study were obtained in dead tree branches; in some instances, specimens (particularly those from Texas) were taken from infested fences and in 2 instances structures adjacent to infested fencing (JWA, pers. comm.). All I. snyderi samples in this study came from coastal localities suggesting that haplotypes could represent populations that established between locations via overwater dispersal during and after the last Pleistocene low sea levels (Scheffrahn et al. 2006).

This is the first study on mitochondrial genetic variation of the drywood termites I. minor and I. snyderi. There appears to be enough genetic variation within these 2 species for a molecular phylogeographic study which may provide insight into the evolution, dispersal and introduction history and establishment of these species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Research was supported in part by the University of Arkansas, Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

J. W. Austin , A. L. Szalanski , R. H. Scheffrahn , M. T. Messenger , S. Dronnet , and A.-G. Bagneres 2005. Genetic evidence for the synonymy of two Reticulitermes species: Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) and Reticulitermes santonensis (Feytaud). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 98: 395–401. Google Scholar

2.

J. W. Austin , A. L. Szalanski , R. H. Scheffrahn , M. T. Messenger , and R. E. Gold 2006. Genetic evidence for two introductions of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), to the United States. Florida Entomol. 89: 183–193. Google Scholar

3.

W. Booth , V. R. Lewis , R. L. Taylor , C. Schal , and E. L. Vargo 2008. Identification and characterization of 15 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the western drywood termite, Incisitermes minor (Hagen). Molec. Ecol. Resources 8: 1102–1104. Google Scholar

4.

B. J. Cabrera , and R. H. Scheffrahn 2005. Western Drywood Termite, Incisitermes minor (Hagen) (Insecta: Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). Entomol. and Nematol. Dept., Florida Coop. Ext. Serv., IFAS, Univ. Florida Publ. EENY-248. Google Scholar

5.

M. Clement , D. Posada , and K. A. Crandall 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molec. Ecol. 9: 1657–1659. Google Scholar

6.

W. Ebeling 1978. Urban Entomology. Univ. California, Berkeley, CA. 695 pp. Google Scholar

7.

J. Felsenstein 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. Google Scholar

8.

J. K. Grace , G. M. Cutten , R. H. Scheffrahn , and D. K. McEkevan 1991. First infestation by Incisitermes minor of a Canadian building (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae). Sociobiol. 18:299–304. Google Scholar

9.

T. A. Hall 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95–98. Google Scholar

10.

P. A. Harvey 1934. Life history of Kalotermes minor , pp. 217–233 In C. A. Kofoid [ed.], Termites and Termite Control 2nd edition. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, California. Google Scholar

11.

P. A. Harvey 1942. The common dry-wood termite. Univ. California Coll. Agric, Agric. Expt. Sta., Berkeley Unnumbered, 4 pp. Google Scholar

12.

K. T. Hathorne , P. A. Zungoli , E. P. Benson , and W. C. Bridges 2000. The termite (Isoptera) fauna of South Carolina. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 17: 219–229. Google Scholar

13.

Y. Indrayani , T. Yoshimura , Y. Fujii , Y. Yanase , Y. Okahisa , and Y. Imamura 2004. Survey on the infestation of houses by Incisitermes minor (Hagen) in Kansai and Hokuriku areas. Japan. J. Environ. Entomol. Zool. 15: 261–268. Google Scholar

14.

Y. Indrayani , K. Matsumura , T. Yoshimura , Y. Imamura , and S. Itakura 2006. Development of microsatellite markers for the drywood termite Incisitermes minor (Hagen). Molec. Ecol. Notes 6: 1249–1251. Google Scholar

15.

S. C. Jones 2004. New inland records of Incisitermes minor (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae) along the Colorado River. Sociobiol. 43: 565–572. Google Scholar

16.

S. Kambhampati , and P. T. Smith 1995. PCR primers for the amplification of four insect mitochondrial gene fragments. Insect Molec. Biol. 4: 233–236. Google Scholar

17.

K. Krishna 1970. Taxonomy, phylogeny and distribution of termites, pp. 127–152 In K. Krishna and F. M. Weesner [eds.], Biology of Termites, Academic Press, London, UK. Vol. 2. Google Scholar

18.

K Krishna , and F. M. Weesner 1969. Biology of Termites. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, NY Google Scholar

19.

K Krishna , and F. M. Weesner 1970. Biology of Termites. Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, New York. 598 pp. Google Scholar

20.

S. F. Light 1934. The distribution and biology of the common drywood termite, Kalotermes minor. pp. 210–216 In C. A. Kofoid [ed.], Termites and Termite Control. 2nd Edition. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, California. Google Scholar

21.

K. Matsuura , E. L. Vargo , K. Kawatsu , P. E. Labadie , H. Nakano , T. Yashiro , and K. Tsuji 2009. Queen succession through asexual reproduction in termites. Science 323: 1687. Google Scholar

22.

M. T. Messenger 2002. National termite survey. New Orleans Mosquito and Termite Control Board.  http://web.archive.org/web/20071116043730/http://www.termitesurvey.com/ Google Scholar

23.

M. T. Messenger , R. H. Scheffrahn , and N.-Y. Su 2000. First report of Incisitermes minor (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae) in Louisiana. Florida Entomol. 83: 92–93. Google Scholar

24.

R. H. Scheffrahn , and W. Crowe 2011. Ship-borne termite (Isoptera) border interceptions in Australia and onboard infestations in Florida, 1986–2009. Florida Entomol. 94: 57–63. Google Scholar

25.

R. H. Scheffrahn , and N.-Y. Su 1994. Keys to soldier and winged adult termites (Isoptera) of Florida. Florida Entomol. 77: 460–474. Google Scholar

26.

R. H. Scheffrahn , N.-Y. Su , J. A. Chase , and B. T. Forschler 2001. New termite (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae) records from Georgia. J. Entomol. Sci. 36: 109–113. Google Scholar

27.

R. H. Scheffrahn , J. Krecek , B. Maharajh , N.-Y. Su , J. A. Chase , J. R. Mangold , A. L. Szalanski , J. W. Austin , and J. Nixon 2004. Establishment of the African termite, Coptotermes sjostedti (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on the island of Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 872–876. Google Scholar

28.

R. H. Scheffrahn , J. Krecek , A. L. Szalanski , and J. W. Austin 2005. Synonymy of the neotropical arboreal termites, Nasutitermes corniger and N. costalis (Isoptera: Termitidae), with evidence from morphology, genetics, and biogeography. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 98: 273–281. Google Scholar

29.

R. H. Scheffrahn , J. Krecek , A. L. Szalanski , J. W. Austin , and Y. Roisin 2005. Synonymy of two arboreal termites (Isoptera: Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae): Nasutitermes corniger from the Neotropics and N. polygynus from New Guinea. Florida Entomol. 88: 28–33. Google Scholar

30.

R. H. Scheffrahn , J. Krecek , J. A. Chase , B. Maharajh , and J. R. Mangold 2006. Taxonomy, biogeography, and notes on termites (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae, Termitidae) of the Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 99: 463–486. Google Scholar

31.

R. H. Scheffrahn , J. Krecek , R. Ripa , and P. Luppichini 2008. Endemic origin and vast anthropogenic dispersal of the West Indian drywood termite. Biol. Invasions 11: 787–799. Google Scholar

32.

C. Simon , F. Frati , A. Beckenbach , B. Crespi , H. Liu , and P. Flook 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 651–701. Google Scholar

33.

T. E. Snyder 1952. Non-subterranean termites at home and abroad. Pest Control 20: 9, 23 and 26. Google Scholar

34.

T. E. Snyder 1954. Order Isoptera. The termites of the United States and Canada. National Pest Control Association. New York. 64 pp. Google Scholar

35.

N.-Y. Su , and R. H. Scheffrahn 1990. Economically important termites in the United States and their control. Sociobiol. 17: 77–94. Google Scholar

36.

A. L. Szalanski , D. S. Sikes , R. Bischof , and M. Fritz 2000. Population genetics and phylogenetics of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 589–594. Google Scholar

37.

A. L. Szalanski , R. H. Scheffrahn , J. W. Austin , J. Krecek , and N.-Y. Su 2004. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Heterotermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in the West Indies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 556–566. Google Scholar
James W. Austin, L. Szalanski Allen, Cesar Solorzano, Roxane Magnus, and Rudolf H. Scheffrahn "Mitochondrial DNA Genetic Diversity of the Drywood Termites Incisitermes minor and I. snyderi (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae)," Florida Entomologist 95(1), 75-81, (1 March 2012). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0112
Published: 1 March 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top