An infestation of Homoeocerus variabilis Dallas (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on khejri, Prosopis cineraria, was first noticed in 2010 at the Experimental Farm of Central Institute for Arid Horticulture and other fields of Bikaner district, Rajasthan, India. The maximum incidence was observed in December (66.7%) and minimum in June (16.7%). The number of this bug ranged between 27.3 and 222.9 adults per plant. This species is characterized by an ochraceous body with a broad red basal fascia on the pronotum between the humeral angles, small pale scutellum, antennae 4-segmented, the basal part of second and third segment is pale yellow, third segment flattened at the tip and fourth segment is the shortest. The mean body lengths of the male and female adult vary and were recorded as 12.2 mm and 15.5 mm, respectively.
Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce (Fabales, Fabaceae), commonly called khejri (synonyms: jambi, jambu, shumi, jandi) is a leguminous, multipurpose tree species distributed in hot arid and semiarid regions of India, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and Arabia (Pareek & Purohit 2002; Hanelt & IPK, 2001). It is the most revered indigenous plant of hot arid and semi-arid regions of western India and mostly found in north-western parts of Rajasthan, Gujarat and Haryana. Khejri is also known as “Queen of the Desert”, and it is predominant constituent of the vegetation complex in the hot arid region of Rajasthan. It is an integral part of the life support systems of rural communities. Leaves of this tree are used as animal fodder and its young pods used as vegetable. Apart from these uses, it is extremely drought tolerant, promotes soil fertility by increasing organic carbon, N, P and K under its canopy (Srivastava & Hetherington 1991).
In the recent years, khejri tree decline has been noticed in the Thar Desert of India. The tree decline has been suspected to be caused by the lowering of the water table, mechanization of farm lands and incidence of pests. Some 153 insect and non-insect pests have been reported to damage P. cineraria in the world (Beeson 1941; Mathur & Singh 1960; Singh & Bhandari 1986; Parihar 1993; Parihar & Singh 1993), of which 26 are known to be potential threats in arid and semi-arid regions (Ahmed et al. 2004). The coreid bug infestation on khejri has not yet been reported. Here, we report the new information on the incidence of H. variabilis on khejri, its morphological characters and taxonomic identification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Incidence and Symptoms
Twenty 4-yr old khejri trees were randomly selected in each of 3 replicates at the Experimental Farm of the Central Institute for Arid Horticulture (CIAH) (N 28° 06′E 73° 21′). Each replicate was made at a different site. Incidence of infested trees, number of bugs observed on each tree and symptoms of damage and decline (in comparison with un-infested plants) were recorded from Aug 2010 to Jul 2011. The sampling was done by visual observation and manual counting. Average incidence was calculated as the percent of whole trees infested with H. variabilis. Average number of bugs per tree was calculated on the basis of observations recorded of ten randomly selected whole khejri trees with 3 replications (different places).
TABLE 1.
MEAN PERCENT OF PROSOPIS CINERARIA TREES INFESTED THE COREID, HOMOEOCERUS VARIABILIS AND THEIR MEAN NUMBER PER PROSOPIS CINERARIA TREE IN 2010 AT THE EXPERIMENTAL FARM OF THE CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR ARID HORTICULTURE, BIKANER DISTRICT, RAJASTHAN, INDIA.
TABLE 2.
MEAN LINEAR MORPHOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF VARIOUS BODY PARTS OF DIFFERENT LIFE STAGES OF THE COREID, HOMOEOCERUS VARIABILIS. EACH BODY PART WAS MEASURED ON 20 INDIVIDUALS, AND ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE EXPRESSED IN MILLIMETERS.
Morphometric Measurements
Twenty bugs (20 males & 20 females) were used for observation and measurements. The bugs were reared under laboratory condition for measurement of different stages. The average linear measurements of various body parts of male and female bugs were obtained under a stereo binoculars microscope (Radical Instruments, Ambala, Haryana, India) using Jenoptic Pro 2.8.0 software. The terminology used to denote different parts of the body of the coreid bug followed Albrecht (1955). The bug samples collected from the CIAH farm and other fields were preserved in 70 per cent alcohol and deposited at the Insect Biosystematic Section, Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi for taxonomic identification.
Statistical Analysis
Transformations were used as necessary to achieve normality in the data before analysis. The data on incidence and population of bugs were analyzed through one-way ANOVA using SPSS software (O'Connor 2000). The means of significant parameters, among tested month wise incidence and population were compared using Turkey's honestly significant difference (HSD) tests for paired comparisons at probability level of 5%. The standard error of the mean was calculated by this formula where, ‘s’ is the sample standard deviation and ‘n’ is the size (number of observations) of the sample.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
For the first time, bugs were observed on khejri tree in the hot arid region of northwestern India, (i.e., Thar Desert) and identified as Homoeocerus variabilis Dallas. During the present study, the average incidence of bugs on trees ranged between 16.7 and 66.7 per cent (Table 1). The incidence and the numbers were higher in winter months (Nov to Feb) than during other seasons and the maximum incidence of 66.7 per cent was recorded in Dec and the minimum in Jul. Thus the highest mean number of this bug species per tree was recorded in Dec (222.9/plant) followed by Jan (198.5/ plant) and the lowest was in Jul (27.3/ plant) (Table 1). The bugs were found to be aggregated on the middle stems and branches with dense foliage during the winter season. During a survey of the natural vegetation, the population of this pest was found to be higher on young trees (less than 5 yr old) than the old trees. The bugs sucked the sap from newly emerging leaves, young branches and flowers, which led to the suppression of growth of the khejri tree through drying of branches, leaves and flowers (Fig. 1). The affected trees produced defective pods unsuitable for human consumption. Other Homoeocerus species like H. signatus on Acacia nilotica and Prosopis juliflora saplings (Yousuf & Gaur 1993), H. prominulus on Prosopis cineraria (Ward et al. 1977), Homoeocerus sp. on Prosopis cineraria (Parihar 1993) and H. pallens on guava (Agunloye 1986) have been reported to damage these tree species. These latter pests were also found to occur in all seasons of the year. The females laid eggs in soil at depths of 4 to 7 mm. Eggs were light green in color, elongated and oval shaped.
TABLE 3.
MEAN LINEAR MORPHOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF VARIOUS TRAITS OF ADULT MALES AND FEMALES OF HOMOEOCERUS VARIABILIS, WHICH WAS FOUND INFESTING PROSOPIS CINERARIA TREES IN 2010. EACH BODY PART WAS MEASURED ON 20 INDIVIDUALS, AND ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE EXPRESSED IN MILLIMETERS.
Data on linear measurements of H. variabilis have been presented in Tables 2 and 3 and Fig. 2. The female was distinctly larger than the male in respect to all body parts. This bug was typically characterized as having an ochraceous body with a broad red basal fascia on the pronotum between the humeral angles, small pale scutellum, antennae 4-segmented, the basal part of second and third segment was pale yellow, third segment flattened at the tip and 4th segment was the shortest. In published literature no morphometric details given on H. variabilis could be found; and the first morphometric study of H. variabilis is described herein. The mean body lengths of males and females were 12.2 mm and 15.5 mm, respectively (Table 3.) In comparison, second and third antennal segment H. signatus are black and of body length is 19 mm (Yousuf & Gaur 1993).
To our knowledge this is the first report of H. variabilis on khejri. This bug is damaging economically important parts of tree, such as leaves, flowers and pods. Therefore, management practices needs to be developed and implemented to minimize the losses caused by this pest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Dr. V. V. Ramamurthy, National Coordinator, ICAR Network Project on Insect Biosystematics, Division of Entomology, IARI, New Delhi for the identification of this pest and Dr. R. Swaminathan, Associate Professor, Department of Entomology, MPUAT, Udaipur for critical discussion and suggestions.