Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2013 Atlantic Rainforest Remnant Harbors Greater Biotic Diversity but Reduced Lepidopteran Populations Compared to a Eucalyptus Plantation
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Study of the dynamics and distribution of lepidopteran defoliators is important because some of them are major pests of eucalyptus. More than 3,000,000 ha of eucalyptus are now planted in Brazil even though the genus is not native there. The goal of this study was to document the frequency and constancy indexes of lepidopteran pests of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden (Myrtaceae) collected with 5 light traps (replicates) in different habitats. The first and second traps were installed in a eucalyptus plantation at 400 and 200 m, respectively, from the interface with a native vegetation area (Atlantic Rainforest); the third in the interface and the fourth and the fifth in native vegetation at 200 and 400 m, respectively, from the interface zone. The most frequent primary pest species were Stenalcidia grosica Schaus, 1901 (Geometridae) and Thyrinteina leucoceraea Rindge, 1961 (Geometridae) with greater frequencies in the eucalyptus plantation at 400 and 200 m from the interface with the native vegetation. In the native vegetation at 200 m from the interface Oxydia vesulia Cramer, 1779 (Geometridae) (33.33%) was the most frequently collected primary pest species, and in the interface zone, Eupseudosoma involuta Sepp, 1855 (16.27%), and Eupseudosoma aberrans Schaus, 1905 (Arctiidae) (15.22%) were the most frequently collected primary pest species. Native vegetation areas of Atlantic Rainforest are more spatially heterogeneous and abundant in host plant species than eucalypt plantations and the high level of species diversity within native vegetation helps to provide natural biological control of herbivorous insects in nearby areas reforested with eucalyptus species.

Plantations of eucalyptus (Myrtaceae)–an exotic in Brazil–represent one of the fastest growing sectors of the Brazilian economy with over 3,000,000 ha planted (Stape et al. 2001; Costa et al. 2009; Assis & Resende 2011). Species of this genus can thrive in a wide variety of habitats including those with low water availability and fertility (Stape et al. 2004; Ryan et al. 2010). Eucalyptus is used for reforestation in many countries (Loch & Floyd 2001; Erskine et al. 2005). The abundance of food and low populations of natural enemies can increase the occurrence of insect pests in these plantations (Withers 2001; Cunningham et al. 2005). The importance of these insects can increase because more native species are continuously adapting to Eucalyptus spp. plantations (Freitas et al. 2005).

The level of herbivory in a plantation depends on size of insect populations (Stone & Bacon 1994; Vranjic & Ash 1997). These insect populations, in turn, are affected by factors such as migration and dispersal as well as by other variables including the structure of the forest itself, biochemistry, physical and internal plant defenses, and interactions between herbivores and their natural enemies (Jäkel & Roth 2004; Boege & Marquis 2005; Moir et al. 2005). Other factors such as a low number of density dependent factors can lead to population outbreaks of herbivores in monocultures; for example when Mnesampela privata Guenée, 1857 (Geometridae) colonizes a eucalyptus plantation in 1 year, its population often erupts to highly damaging levels in the next year during spring/summer (Steinbauer et al. 2001, 2004). Species diversity and population stability are positively correlated with more diverse environments (Steinbauer et al. 2006). Lepidopteran species in these areas can be bioindicators of microclimatic alterations, resource availability and habitat conservation as changes occur in these human-driven processes over time (Wood & Gillman 1998; Kitching et al. 2000; Barlow et al. 2007).

Outbreaks of defoliator lepidopteran pests such as Apatelodes sericea Schaus, 1896 (Eupterotidae), Eupseudosoma involuta Sepp, 1855 (Arctiidae), Euselasia apisaon Dahman, 1823 (Riodinidae), Psorocampa denticulata Schaus, 1901 (Notodontidae), Sarsina violascens Herrich-Schaeffer, 1856 (Lymantriidae), Oxydia vesulia Cramer, 1779, Sabulodes caberata cabera- ta Gueneé, 1857 and Thyrinteina arnobia Stoll, 1782 (Geometridae) have been documented in eucalyptus plantations in Brazil (Zanuncio et al. 2000; Freitas et al. 2005). Other groups such as those of the superfamily Saturnioidea also have species which damage eucalyptus plants (Zanuncio et al. 2001; Hawes et al. 2009). Light traps are the major sampling method for lepidopteran defoliators of eucalypt plants in Brazil because the majority of the lepidopteran defoliator species are active during the night (Zanuncio et al. 2006).

Native insects migrate from native plants, which present a more diversified fauna than plantations (Rao et al. 2000). Exotic plants, often are associated with reduced numbers of natural enemies (Murta et al. 2008), can be used as favorable ecological niches by insects with high population growth rates. Integrated management of insect pests in eucalyptus plantations in Brazil includes the use of native vegetation remnants intentionally intermingled within plantations in an effort to decrease populations of pests species and to increase populations of their natural enemies (Barlow et al. 2008; Silva et al. 2010). Maintaining or planting areas with native vegetation can favor the multiplication and distribution of natural enemies of lepidopteran defoliators, which can then reduce defoliator populations in forest plantations (Zanuncio et al. 1998a; Gamez-Virues et al. 2008).

Frequency and constancy indexes of primary and secondary lepidopteran pests were studied in 3 habitats, viz: (i) a Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden plantation, (ii) in the interface of this eucalyptus plantation with an area of native vegetation (edge) (Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest biome), and (iii) in areas of native vegetation. The overall objective was to test the hypothesis that the heterogeneity of native vegetation affects population densities of lepidopteran defoliators in eucalypt plantations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study Area

The research was conducted in an E. grandis and Eucalyptus torelliana F. Muell. plantation with 2,909.65 ha in the Vale do Rio Doce in Ipaba, Minas Gerais State, Brazil at S 19° 20′ W 45° 25′ and 213 m asl, and in fragments of secondary forest with high anthropic impact (Atlantic Rainforest) with 1,363.83 ha. The climate of this region has 2 well defined seasons: one hot and humid (Oct to May) and the other cold and dry (Apr to Sep) with a minimum temperature of 13.5 °C and maximum temperature of 34.6 °C and monthly rainfall ranging from 0 to 112 mm. Lepidopteran individuals were sampled in a eucalyptus stand with an area of 20.09 ha with 3 × 2 m tree spacing. This timber stand was 7 years old at the beginning of the study. Cultural treatments were not made during the study except for the control of leaf cutting ants with sulfluramid baits (Zanetti et al. 2008). Vegetation under eucalyptus trees was not removed.

Sampling Procedures

Lepidopterans were sampled in each locale with 5 light traps using 12 volt batteries and a fluorescent black light (INTRAL AL 012-model, 12 volts) with 1 collection every 15 days from Apr 1997 to Mar 1998. Sampling points were marked every 200 m along a transect through the eucalyptus stand and across the fragment of native vegetation with the help of a global positioning system (GPS).

Five sampling points were established in each locale. The first and second traps were situated in the eucalyptus stand at 400 and 200 m, respectively, from the interface zone (border between plantation and native vegetation) (Eg400 and Eg200); the third trap was set at the interface between eucalypt and native vegetation (Bor), and the fourth and fifth were placed inside the fragment of the native vegetation at 200 and 400 m, respectively, from the interface of this area with the eucalyptus (Vn200 and Vn400). Light traps were placed 2 m high on eucalyptus plants (plantation) or on native Myrtaceae plants (native vegetation area).

The traps were turned on every 15 days during 1 night starting at 6:00 PM and turned off the following morning (7:00 AM) when the insects were removed (13 hours of operation). Collections were postponed 1 or 2 days in case of rain. The insects were collected in a plastic bag (20 L) with fragments of journal pages (15 cm) treated with ethyl acetate fixed at the funnel at the base of the light traps to reduce damage to the collected insects (Zanuncio et al. 1998a). Insects were sorted by habitat and date of collection and sent to Federal University of Viçosa, Animal Biology Department in Viçosa, Minas Gerais State, Brazil where they were counted and classified and those in good conditions sent to Federal University of Paraná, Zoology Department, Curitiba, Paraná State, Brazil and Uiraçu Institute, Camacan, Bahia, Brazil for identification.

Statistical Analysis

The annual totals and averages of insects and species captured per light trap in the 5 sampling sites were determined. The main lepidopteran species from the eucalyptus plantations were divided into primary and secondary pests (Zanuncio et al. 1998b, 2006). Species with no importance defined for eucalyptus plantations and those unidentified were not evaluated. The first group represents species reported in outbreaks in Brazil and that caused economic and environmental damage. The second group includes species with potential to become pests by feeding on eucalyptus, but with reduced numbers or low frequencies.

Frequency and constancy faunal indices were calculated for each pest species (Pereira et al. 2001; Zanuncio et al. 2003). The frequency was calculated with the formula F = (n ÷ t) × 100, where F is the frequency index, n the total number of individuals collected per species and t the total number of individuals collected. The constancy index (C) was calculated with the formula C = (p ÷ n) × 100, where p is the number of samples with the species and n the total number of individuals collected. The species collected were grouped as constants, incidental or accidental when present in more than 50%, between 25 and 50% or less than 25% of the samples, respectively. The diversity was obtained by the Shannon index (H’). The data of the number of species were submitted to the χ2 test and the diversity indices to variance analysis (ANOVA) and the means compared by Tukey's multiple range test.

RESULTS

Number of Individuals of Primary and Secondary Lepidopteran Pest Species

The proportions of pest species from within the plantation of eucalyptus to within the native vegetation were presented. A total of 2,039 individuals of 22 pest species of 13 primary (group I) and 9 secondary (group II) pests was collected with 44.00% and 34.38% in the eucalyptus at 200 and 400 m from the interface; 18.68% at the interface and 1.47% and 1.47% inside the native vegetation at 200 and 400 m from this interface. The proportion of pests was greater in the plantation of eucalyptus than in the native vegetation along the transect (Table 1).

The number of individuals of eucalyptus pest species was greater at sampling points Eg200, Eg400 and Bor with 897 (44.0%), 701 (34.38%) and 381 (18.68%) individuals, respectively (Table 1). Primary pests showed a greater number of species at point Eg400 and of individuals at Eg200 with values of 12 and 796, respectively, while the numbers of species and individuals of secondary pests were greater at point Eg200 with values of 8 and 101, respectively (Fig. 1).

TABLE 1.

NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY LEPIDOPTERAN PEST SPECIES IN THE EUCALYPT MONOCULTURE AND THE NATIVE VEGETATION AT EACH SAMPLING POINT IN IPABA, MINAS GERAIS STATE, BRAZIL FROM APR 1997 TO MAR 1998.

t03_887.gif

Frequency of Individuals of Primary and Secondary Lepidopteran Pest Species

The most frequent primary pest species were Stenalcidia grosica Schaus, 1901, Thyrinteina leucoceraea Rindge, 1961 (Geometridae) and O. vesulia, while other important eucalyptus pests such as S. caberata caberata, S. violascens and T. arnobia had reduced frequencies. The frequencies of S. grosica and T. leucoceraea were greater in the eucalyptus at 400 and 200 m from the interface with 44.94% and 41.48% and 25.11% and 12.82% of the individuals collected, respectively. Oxydia vesulia in the native vegetation at 200 m from the interface had 33.33% of the individuals and E. involuta and Eupseudosoma aberrans Schaus, 1905 (Arctiidae) in the interface had 16.27% and 15.22%, respectively. Automeris illustris Walker, 1855 (Saturniidae) was the most frequent species of group II especially at the points inside the native vegetation at 400 and 200 m from the interface with 30.00% and 16.67% of the individuals collected for this group, respectively (Table 2).

Constancy of Primary and Secondary Lepidopteran Pest Species

Lepidopteran species were mainly constant at the interface, accessory at Eg200 and accidental at Eg400 and Bor (Table 3). No primary pest was constant at all points, but S. grosica was constant in the eucalyptus stand and at the interface and accidental in the native vegetation; T. leucoceraea was constant in the eucalyptus, accessory at the interface and accidental inside the native vegetation; Oxydia vesulia was constant at the interface, accessory in the eucalyptus and accidental in the native vegetation; Eupseudosoma aberrans was constant at the interface, accidental in the eucalyptus and it was trapped in the native vegetation. Of the secondary pest species, Idalus admirabilis Cramer, 1777 (Arctiidae) was accessory in the eucalyptus and at the interface, while other species were accidental in the eucalyptus plantation and in the native vegetation (Table 3).

Fig. 1.

Number of individuals and of species of lepidopteran primary and secondary pests of eucalyptus in Ipaba, Minas Gerais State, Brazil from Apr 1997 to Mar 1998. These points were designated as follows: eucalyptus at 400 m from the interface (Eg400), eucalyptus at 200 m from the interface (Eg200), interface of eucalyptus and native vegetation (Bor), native vegetation at 200 m from the interface (Vn200) and native vegetation at 400 m from the interface (Vn400).

f01_887.jpg

DISCUSSION

The distribution of frequencies of lepidopteran pests of E. grandis was not uniform with a few species making up the majority of individuals collected. This shows the adaptability of lepidopterans pests in the eucalyptus plantation in Ipaba. Stenalcidia grosica represented 39.82% of the individuals of primary and secondary pests from Jun 1989 to Jun 1994 in Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake (Myrtaceae) plantations in São José dos Campos, São Paulo State, Brazil (Pereira et al. 2001). This defoliator was also a primary and abundant pest from Aug 1991 to 1996 in E. grandis in Nova Era, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Freitas et al. 2005) and from Jun 1993 to Jul 1998 in older (6 and 7 years) E. grandis plants in drier periods in Santa Bárbara, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Guedes et al. 2000). This could been seen in the constant population size of this insect with the largest number of individuals during dry and cold periods from Jul 1992 to Jun 1993 on E. urophylla in Três Marias, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Zanuncio et al. 2003). The increase of food in these plantations may favor adapted herbivores in detriment of their natural enemies, which can increase the damage (Zanuncio et al. 2006). Moreover, herbivores collected have more difficulties to find and colonize host plants in heterogeneous environments, where the food can be scarcer and the survival and the persistence of natural enemies greater (Zanuncio et al. 1998a).

The larger number of individuals collected in E. grandis compared to the native vegetation of the Atlantic Rainforest can be explained by the fact most organisms have greater number of species with lower populations in environments with low heterogeneity (Zanuncio et al. 1998a). The population of O. vesulia was greater from Jun 1993 to Jul 1998 in a E. grandis than in native plants of the Cerrado (Brazilian Savanna-type vegetation) biome in Paraopeba, Minas Gerais State, Brazil; also, the number of individuals of this species decreased between Feb and Aug during a period of lower rainfall and temperatures (Guedes et al. 2000). Trichogramma acacioi Brun, Moraes and Soares, 1984 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) parasitized more than 93% of the eggs of this defoliator in the laboratory (Oliveira et al. 2011) and the predatory wasps Champs sp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) preyed its larvae in São Paulo State, Brazil (Fernandes et al. 2010).

Thyrinteina leucoceraea was the second most collected species with 16.18% of the individuals of primary pests. This species causes economic damage as the main defoliator of eucalyptus in Brazil (Oliveira et al. 2005; Bernadino et al. 2007), even though its pupae were parasitized by Palmistichus elaeisis Delvare and LaSalle, 1993 (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on E. urophylla plants (Pereira et al. 2008). Outbreaks of lepidopteran defoliators can occur in eucalypt plantations but the presence of essential oils and secondary metabolites of these plants can help reduce their populations. This is why it is important to study the occurrence of these defoliators by eucalypt species and region (Henery 2011).

Thyrinteina arnobia and Glena sp. (Geometridae) were captured in low numbers, with 13 and 16 individuals, respectively during the entire period. Also, Glena unipennaria unipennaria Guenée, 1857 (Geometridae) was abundant from Aug 1991 to Jul 1996 and from Jun 1993 to Jul 1998 on E. grandis in Nova Era and Santa Bárbara, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, respectively. The number of individuals of this lepidopteran was greater on older plants (6 to 7 years old). This demonstrates the necessity of sampling pests during the entire life cycle of the eucalyptus plantation (Guedes et al. 2000; Freitas et al. 2005). Thyrinteina arnobia and Stenalcidia spp. (Geometridae) showed greater numbers of individuals of the primary pests during periods of lower rainfall and temperature. Psorocampa denticulata Schaus, 1901 (Notodontidae) was more frequent in months with greater rainfall between Mar 1987 and Feb 1992 in E. grandis plantations in Bom Despacho, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Zanuncio et al. 2006). This indicates the necessity of monitoring lepidopteran pests during these periods. Podisus distinctus Stäl, 1860, Podisus nigrispinus Dallas, 1851 (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) (predators) and P. elaeisis (parasitoid) are natural enemies of T. arnobia on Myrtaceae (Soares et al. 2009; Oliveira et al. 2011; Pereira et al. 2011), especially on native plants, such as Psidium guajava L., 1753 and Myrciaria cauliflora (Mart.) O. Berg., 1854 when compared to exotic species such as Eucalyptus spp. (Grosman et al. 2005). Lepidopteran pests should be monitored during the entire growing cycle of the eucalypt culture to inform efforts to reduce damage by these insects (Wingfield et al. 2008). Thyrinteina arnobia had the highest number of individuals for all lepidopteran pests from Mar 1987 to Feb 1992 during an outbreak on E. grandis in Bom Despacho, Minas Gerais State, Brazil and preferred older plants (Zanuncio et al. 2006).

TABLE 2.

FREQUENCY (%) OF INDIVIDUALS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY LEPIDOPTERAN PEST SPECIES IN THE EUCALYPT MONOCULTURE AND THE NATIVE VEGETATION AT EACH SAMPLING POINT IN IPABA, MlNAS GERAIS STATE, BRAZIL FROM APR 1997 TO MAR 1998.

t02_887.gif

Eupseudosoma aberrans and S. grosica were not collected in this region but in Três Marias, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, they were consistently present in all collections and with high possibilities of outbreaks during Jul 1992 to Jun 1993 on E. urophylla (Zanuncio et al. 2003). Monitoring of lepidopteran defoliators in forest plantations and native vegetation has shown that species with longer wing spans are more frequent in areas of native vegetation, but the reasons for this are not known (Uehara-Prado et al. 2005).

The high number of individuals of primary and secondary pest species inside the E. grandis stand may have been caused by the greater food availability, and by the lower populations of natural enemies in the plantations in this area (Jäkel & Roth 2004; Sousa et al. 2010). This suggests greater possibilities of outbreaks of these species in Ipaba, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. The numbers of individuals of species of groups I and II were greater as shown by the temporal distribution in periods of lower temperature and relative humidity when plants may show stress mainly caused by water deficit. This stress may reduce defense mechanisms and facilitate the survival of pests in eucalypt plantations. In addition under these conditions, processes of plant defense, such as the levels of compounds that reduce the digestibility of toxins by herbivores and release of allelochemicals to attract natural enemies are reduced (Zanuncio et al. 2006).

TABLE 3.

CONSTANCY OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY LEPIDOPTERAN PEST SPECIES IN THE EUCALYPT MONOCULTURE AND THE NATIVE VEGETATION AT EACH SAMPLING POINT IN IPABA, MINAS GERAIS STATE, BRAZIL FROM APR 1997 TO MAR 1998.

t03_887.gif

The high number of these pest species in eucalyptus plantations may be caused by the exotic Myrtaceae, which may not have developed defensive mechanisms to resist lepidopteran defoliators unlike the native plants of this family (Marinho et al. 2008). This is also caused by the greater species richness of areas with native vegetation (Rao et al. 2000; Barbosa et al. 2005). Homogeneous eucalyptus plantations have a larger food supply for pests and support fewer natural enemies of some pest species, which can result in increased populations of these pests (Steinbauer et al. 2006; Berndt & Allen 2010). Also, increased vegetation heterogeneity and ecological succession in plantations after they become 3 years old may be caused by lower levels of silvicultural activities in older stands. These activities may favor reproduction of many lepidopteran species and result in an increase in the diversity of insects present including natural enemies of pest species (Zanuncio et al. 1998b). The presence of immature individuals of lepidopteran primary or secondary pests in areas of native and cultivated forests is correlated to the numbers of adults of these insects captured with light traps (Hawes et al. 2009). The apparent species richness in the native forest and in its edge is probably caused by the confluence of these 2 habitats and the capture of insects from both habitats in the edge environment. Also, the light traps in these areas are in more open areas, and can attract insects from longer distances (Axmacher et al. 2004; Cunningham et al. 2005). Diversity of lepidopteran species of groups III (unimportant species with respect to eucalyptus) and IV (unidentified species) increased with the age of E. grandis plants from Mar 1987 to Feb 1992 in Bom Despacho, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Zanuncio et al. 2006). The high occurrence of lepidopteran species in the E. grandis plantation may be explained by their dependence on food provided by eucalypt plants (Uehara-Prado et al. 2007). These factors can explain the greater number of individuals of insect pests in the eucalypt area and also indicates the diversity of lepidopterans may be used as indicator of ecosystems modification (Myers et al. 2000).

The primary pests, E. involuta and O. vesulia, were accidental in the E. grandis plantation, and the first was accessory in eucalyptus, suggesting it reaches peak population levels, which are short-lived. This variation can be caused by climate, natural enemies and by plant or insects factors. None of the species collected was constant or accessory in the native vegetation which may be caused by the larger plant heterogeneity and more stable insect populations (Rao et al. 2000; Jäkel & Roth 2004). The greatest number of species with fluctuating populations probably occurred because some of them were present in excessive numbers, which reduces the dominance of other potentially dominant species. The dominance index takes the number of insects collected into consideration (Bernardi et al. 2011). Species with populations that do not fluctuate can cause the appearance or disappearance of other organisms. This can occur during eucalyptus cultivation, where dominant insect species can increase their populations because of the available food supply, which explains outbreaks of lepidopteran pests in eucalypt plantations (Bernardi et al. 2008).

Of group II species, I. admirabilis showed greater abundance at point Eg200 and with 38 and 24 individuals at Eg400 and Bor, respectively, although it was accessory in these areas. Species of group II are important because they affect the diversity of ecosystems because of their high species diversity in ecological systems during succession (Bernardi et al. 2011). A high percentage of accidental species in forest communities indicates a more stable environment, while species listed as accessory are better adapted to the communities (Bernardi et al. 2011).

The number of individuals of lepidopteran pest species was low in the native vegetation fragment, which is more spatially heterogeneous and abundant in host plants than eucalypt plantations. The maintenance of these native vegetation areas inserted within the monoculture of eucalyptus and the vegetation under these trees can improve spatial heterogeneity and contribute to larger species diversity and natural biological control of herbivorous insects in reforestation with eucalyptus species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Dr. Olaf Hermann Hendrik Mielke (Federal University of Paraná, Zoology Department, Curitiba, Paraná State, Brazil) and Dr. Vitor Osmar Becker (Uiraçu Institute, Camacan, Bahia, Brazil) for identifying the lepidopterans. To “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)”, “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)” and “Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)” for financial support. To Asia Science Editing of the Republic of Ireland for editing and correcting the English of this manuscript.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

T. F. Assis , and M. D. V. Resende 2011. Genetic improvement of forest tree species. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. S1: 44–49. Google Scholar

2.

J. C. Axmacher , G. Holtmann , L. Scheuermann , G. Brehem , K. Muller-Hohenstein , and K. Fiedler 2004. Diversity of geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) along an Afrotropical elevational rainforest transect. Divers. Distrib. 10(4): 293–302. Google Scholar

3.

V. S. Barbosa , I. R. Leal , L. Iannuzzi , and J. Almeida-Cortez 2005. Distribution pattern of herbivorous insects in a remnant of Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Neotrop. Entomol. 34(5): 701–711. Google Scholar

4.

J. Barlow , W. L. Overal , I. S. Araujo , T. A. Gardner , and C. A. Peres 2007. The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Appl. Ecol. 44(1): 1001–1012. Google Scholar

5.

J. Barlow , I. S. Araujo , W. L. Overal , T. A. Gardner , F. D. Mendes , I. R. Lake , and C. A. Peres 2008. Diversity and composition of fruit-feeding butterflies in tropical Eucalyptus plantations. Biodivers. Conserv. 17(5): 1089–1104. Google Scholar

6.

O. Bernardi , M. S. Garcia , E. J. E. Silva , L. C. F. Zazycki , D. Bernardi , and E. Finkenauer 2011. Survey population and fauna analysis of Lepidoptera in Eucalyptus spp. in the Municipality of Pinheiro Machado, RS. Cienc. Florest. 21(4): 735–744. Google Scholar

7.

A. S. Bernardino , T. V. Zanuncio , J. C. Zanuncio , E. R. Lima , and J. E. Serrão 2007. Note on gynandromorphism in the eucalyptus defoliator Thyrinteina arnobia (Stoll, 1782) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 79(2): 235–237. Google Scholar

8.

L. A. Berndt , and G. R. Allen 2010. Biology and pest status of Uraba lugens Walker (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) in Australia and New Zealand. Australian J. Entomol. 49(3): 268–277. Google Scholar

9.

K. Boege , and R. J. Marquis 2005. Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20(10): 441–448. Google Scholar

10.

A. M. Costa , N. Curi , E. F. Araújo , J. J. Marques , and M. D. Menezes 2009. Management units for Eucalyptus cultivation in four physiographical regions of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazilian Sci. For. 37(84): 465–473. Google Scholar

11.

S. A. Cunningham , R. B. Floyd , and T. A. Weir 2005. Do Eucalyptus plantations host an insect community similar to remnant Eucalyptus forest? Austral Ecol. 30(1): 103–117. Google Scholar

12.

P. D. Erskine , D. Lamb , and G. Borschmann 2005. Growth performance and management of a mixed rainforest tree plantation. New Forest. 29(2): 117– 134. Google Scholar

13.

L. B. D. Fernandes , M. M. Dias , M. A. Fernandes , and A. M. Penteado-Dias 2010. Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) parasitoids of Lepidoptera caterpillars feeding on Croton floribundus Spreng (Euphorbiaceae). Rev. Brasileira Entomol. 54(2): 263–269. Google Scholar

14.

F. A. Freitas , T. V. Zanuncio , J. C. Zanuncio , P. M. Conceição , M. D. Q. Fialho , and A. S. Bernardino 2005. Effect of plant age, temperature and rain-fall on Lepidoptera insect pests collected with light traps in a Eucalyptus grandis plantation in Brazil. Ann. Forest Sci. 62(1): 85–90. Google Scholar

15.

S. Gamez-Virues , G. M. Gurr , A. Raman , J. La Salle , and H. Nicol 2008. Effects of flowering groundcover vegetation on diversity and activity of wasps in a farm shelterbelt in temperate Australia. BioControl 54(2): 211–218. Google Scholar

16.

A. H. Grosman , M. Van Breemen , A. Holtz , A. Pallini , A. M. Rugama , H. Pengel , M. Venzon , J. C. Zanuncio , M. W. Sabelis , and A. Janssen 2005. Searching behaviour of an omnivorous predator for novel and native host plants of its herbivores: a study on arthropod colonization of eucalyptus in Brazil. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 116(2): 135–142. Google Scholar

17.

R. N. C. Guedes , T. V. Zanuncio , J. C. Zanuncio , and A. G. B. Medeiros 2000. Species richness and fluctuation of defoliator Lepidoptera populations in Brazilian plantations of Eucalyptus grandis as affected by plant age and weather factors. Forest Ecol. Mgt. 137(1–3): 179–184. Google Scholar

18.

J. Hawes , C. D. Motta , W. L. Overal , J. Barlow , T. A. Gardner , and C. A. Peres 2009. Diversity and composition of Amazonian moths in primary, secondary and plantation forests. J. Trop. Ecol. 25(3): 281–300. Google Scholar

19.

M. L. Henery 2011. The constraints of selecting for insect resistance in plantation trees. Agr. Forest Entomol. 13(2): 111–120. Google Scholar

20.

A. Jäkel , and M. Roth 2004. Conversion of singlelayered Scots pine monocultures into close to-nature mixed hardwood forests: effects on parasitoid wasps as pest antagonists. European J. Forest Res. 123(3): 203–212. Google Scholar

21.

R. L. Kitching , A. G. Orr , L. Thalib , H. Mitchell , M. S. Hopkins , and A. W. Graham 2000. Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 37(1): 284–297. Google Scholar

22.

A. D. Loch , and R. B. Floyd 2001. Insect pests of Tasmanian blue gum, Eucalyptus globulus globulus, in south-western Australia: History, current perspectives and future prospects. Austral Ecol. 26(5): 458–466. Google Scholar

23.

J. S. Marinho , M. G. A. Oliveira , R. N. C. Guedes , A. Pallini , and C. L. Oliveira 2008. Proteinase inhibitors of novel and native host plants and their action in midgut of Thyrinteina leucoceraea caterpillars. Rev. Arvore 32(6): 1125–1132. Google Scholar

24.

M. L. Moir , K. E. C. Brennan , J. M. Koch , J. D. Majer , and M. J. Fletcher 2005. Restoration of a forest ecosystem: The effects of vegetation and dispersal capabilities on the reassembly of plant-dwelling arthropods. Forest Ecol. Mgt. 217(2–3): 294–306. Google Scholar

25.

A. F. Murta , F. T. O. Ker , D. B. Costa , M. M. Espírito-Santo , and M. L. Faria 2008. Influence of Atlantic Rain Forest remnants on the biological control of Euselasia apisaon (Dahman) (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) by Trichogramma maxacalii (Voegele e Pointel) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 37(2): 229–232. Google Scholar

26.

N. Myers , R. A. Mittermeier , C. G. Mittermeier , G. A. B. Fonseca , and J. Kent 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(1): 853–858. Google Scholar

27.

H. N. Oliveira , J. C. Zanuncio , E. P. Pedruzzi , and M. C. Espindula 2005. Rearing of Thyrinteina arnobia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) on guava and eucalyptus in laboratory. Brazilian Arch. Biol. Technol. 48(5): 801–806. Google Scholar

28.

H. N. Oliveira , J. C. Zanuncio , F. F. Pereira , and D. Pratissoli 2011. Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) species as an agents of biological control of Oxydia versulia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Rev. Colombiana Entomol. 37(2): 238–239. Google Scholar

29.

H. N. Oliveira , M. C. Espindula , M. M. Duarte , F. F. Pereira , and J. C. Zanuncio 2011. Development and reproduction of Podisus nigrispinus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) fed with Thyrinteina arnobia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) reared on guava leaves. Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn. 54(3): 429–434. Google Scholar

30.

J. M. M. Pereira , T. V. Zanuncio , J. C. Zanuncio , and A. Pallini 2001. Lepidoptera pests collected in Eucalyptus urophylla (Myrtaceae) plantations during five years in Très Marias, State of Minas Gerais, Brazilian Rev. Biol. Trop. 49(3–4): 1073–1082. Google Scholar

31.

F. F. Pereira , T. V. Zanuncio , J. C. Zanuncio , D. PraTissoli , and M. T. Tavares 2008. Species of Lepidoptera defoliators of Eucalyptus as new host for the parasitoid Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Brazilian Arch. Biol. Technol. 51(2): 259–262. Google Scholar

32.

F. F. Pereira , J. C. Zanuncio , H. N. Oliveira , E. L. V. Grance , P. L. Pastori , and M. D. Gava-OliveiRa 2011. Thermal requirements and estimate number of generations of Palmistichus elaeisis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in different Eucalyptus plantations regions. Brazilian J. Biol. 71(2): 431–436. Google Scholar

33.

M. R. Rao , M. P. Singh , and R. Day 2000. Insect pest problems in tropical agroforestry systems: Contributory factors and strategies for management. Agroforestry Syst. 50(3): 243–277. Google Scholar

34.

M. G. Ryan , J. L. Stape , D. Binkley , S. Fonseca , R. A. Loos , E. N. Takahashi , C. R. Silva , S. R. Silva , R. E. Hakamada , J. M. Ferreira , A. M. N. Lima , J. L. Gava , F. P. Leite , and H. B. Rade , J. M. Alves , and G. G. C. Silva 2010. Factors controlling Eucalyptus productivity: How water availability and stand structure alter production and carbon allocation. Forest Ecol. Mgt. 259(1): 1695–1703. Google Scholar

35.

J. O. Silva , K. N. Oliveira , K. J. Santos , M. M. Espírito-Santo , F. S. Neves , and M. L. Faria 2010. Effects of landscape structure and Eucalyptus genotype on the abundance and biological control of Glycaspis brimblecombei Moore (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 39(1): 91–96. Google Scholar

36.

M. A. Soares , J. C. Zanuncio , G. L. D. Leite , E. D. Wer-Melinger , and J. E. Serrão 2009. Does Thyrinteina arnobia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) use different defense behaviours against predators? J. Plant Dis. Protect. 116(1): 30–33. Google Scholar

37.

S. M. Sousa , M. L. Faria , and A. O. Latini 2010. Differential survival of Euselasia apisaon Dahman (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae) pupae at understorey plants in the Eucalyptus plantations of Belo Oriente, MG, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol. 39(5): 681–685. Google Scholar

38.

J. L. Stape , J. L. M. Gonçalves , and A. N. Gonçalves 2001. Relationships between nursery practices and field performance for Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil: A historical overview and its increasing importance. New Forest. 22(1–2): 19–41. Google Scholar

39.

J. L. Stape , D. Binkley , and M. G. Ryan 2004. Eucalyptus production and the supply, use and efficiency of use of water, light and nitrogen across a geographic gradient in Brazililian Forest Ecol. Mgt. 193(1–2): 17–31. Google Scholar

40.

M. J. Steinbauer , P. B. Mc Quillan , and C. J. Young 2001. Life history and behavioural traits of Mnesampela privata that exacerbate population responses to eucalypt plantations: comparisons with Australian and outbreak species of forest geometrid from the Northern Hemisphere. Austral Ecol. 26(5): 525–534. Google Scholar

41.

M. J. Steinbauer , M. W. Short , and S. Schmidt 2006. The influence of architectural and vegetational complexity in eucalypt plantations on communities of native wasp parasitoids: Towards silviculture for sustainable pest management. Forest Ecol. Mgt. 233(1): 153–164. Google Scholar

42.

M. J. Steinbauer , D. J. Kriticos , Z. Lukacs , and A. R. Clarke 2004. Modelling a forest lepidopteran: phenological plasticity determines voltinism which influences population dynamics. Forest Ecol. Mgt. 198(1–3): 117–131. Google Scholar

43.

C. Stone , and P. E. Bacon 1994. Relationships among moisture stress, insect herbivory, foliar cineole content and the growth of river red gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis. J. Appl. Ecol. 31(4): 604–612. Google Scholar

44.

M. Uehara-Prado , K. S. Brown Junior , and A. V. L. Freitas 2005. Biological traits of frugivorous butterflies in a fragmented and a continuous landscape in the south Brazilian Atlantic forest. J. Lepid. Soc. 59(2): 96–106. Google Scholar

45.

M. Uehara-Prado , K. S. Brown Junior , and A. V. L. Freitas 2007. Species richness, composition and abundance of fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: comparison between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16(1): 43–54. Google Scholar

46.

J. A. Vranjic , and J. E. Ash 1997. Scale insects consistently affect roots more than shoots: The impact of infestation size on growth of eucalypt seedlings. J. Ecol. 85(2): 143–149. Google Scholar

47.

M. J. Wingfield , B. Slippers , B. P. Hurley , T. A. Coutinho , B. D. Wingfield , and J. Roux 2008. Eucalypt pests and diseases: growing threats to plantation productivity. Southern Forests 70(2): 139–144. Google Scholar

48.

T. M. Withers 2001. Colonization of eucalypts in New Zealand by Australian insects. Austral Ecol. 26(5): 467–476. Google Scholar

49.

B. Wood , and M. P. Gillman 1998. The effects of disturbance on forest butterflies using two methods of sampling in Trinidad. Biodivers. Conserv. 7(5): 597–616. Google Scholar

50.

R. Zanetti , J. C. Zanuncio , A. Souza-Silva , L. A. MenDonça , J. O. S. Mattos , and M. S. Rizental 2008. Efficiency of products for thermonebulization on the control of Atta laevigata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in eucalypus plantations. Cienc. Agrotec. 32(4): 1313–1316. Google Scholar

51.

J. C. Zanuncio , J. A. Mezzomo , R. N. C. Guedes , and A. C. Oliveira 1998a. Influence of strips of native vegetation on Lepidoptera associated with Eucalyptus cloeziana in Brazil. Forest Ecol. Mgt. 108(1–2): 85–90. Google Scholar

52.

T. V. Zanuncio , J. C. Zanuncio , M. M. M. Miranda , and A. G. D. Medeiros 1998b. Effect of plantation age on diversity and population fluctuation of Lepidoptera collected in Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil. Forest Ecol. Mgt. 108(1–2): 91–98. Google Scholar

53.

J. C. Zanuncio , T. V. Zanuncio , E. T. Lopes , and F. S. Ramalho 2000. Temporal variations of Lepidoptera collected in an Eucalyptus plantation in the State of Goiás, Brazil. Netherlands J. Zool. 50(4): 435–443. Google Scholar

54.

J. C. Zanuncio , R. N. C. Guedes , T. V. Zanuncio , and A. S. Fabres 2001. Species richness and abundance of defoliating Lepidoptera associated with Eucalyptus grandis in Brazil and their response to plant age. Austral Ecol. 26(6): 582–589. Google Scholar

55.

J. C. Zanuncio , T. V. Zanuncio , F. A. Freitas , and D. Pratissoli 2003. Population density of Lepidoptera in a plantation of Eucalyptus urophylla in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Anim. Biol. 53(1): 17–26. Google Scholar

56.

T. V. Zanuncio , J. C. Zanuncio , F. A. Freitas , D. Pratissoli , C. A. Z. Sediyama , and V. P. Maffia 2006. Main lepidopteran pest species from an eucalyptus plantation in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev. Biol. Trop. 54(2): 553–560. Google Scholar
Onice Teresinha Dall'Oglio, Teresinha Vinha Zanuncio, Wagner De Souza Tavares, José Eduardo Serrão, Carlos Frederico Wilcken, and José Cola Zanuncio "Atlantic Rainforest Remnant Harbors Greater Biotic Diversity but Reduced Lepidopteran Populations Compared to a Eucalyptus Plantation," Florida Entomologist 96(3), 887-896, (1 September 2013). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0324
Published: 1 September 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top