Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2014 Wahlgreniella nervata (Hemiptera: Aphididae), a New Pest of Rose in India
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

First occurrence of the invasive aphid species, Wahlgreniella nervata (Gillette) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) is reported from material collected in Bengaluru, India. Apterous and alate viviparous females were found feeding on tender shoots, young leaves and flower buds of rose (Rosaceae). The identity of this aphid species is supported by morphometrics (aptera and alata) corroborated with molecular analysis based on a fragment of the mitochondrial DNA containing the 5′ region of the cytochrome c oxidase 1 (mtCOI). Diagnostic characters to differentiate W. nervata from other major aphid species viz., Macrosiphum rosae (Linnaeus) and Sitobion rosaeiformis (Das), on Rosa spp., its host plants, distribution and natural enemies are provided. This is a new distributional record of W. nervata. The invasive species compendium developed by CAB International, 2013 has listed W. nervata as invasive in nature.

Rose (Rosa spp. L; Rosales: Rosaceae), is infested by 55 aphid species (Blackman & Eastop 2000;  http://www.aphidsonworldsplants.info/C_HOSTS_Ros_Ryt.htm#Rosa) of which 39 are previously recognized from India (Raychaudhuri 1983; Chakrabarti & Sarkar 2001). Wahlgreniella nervata (Gillette 1908) is a spindle-shaped, pale green aphid characterized by elongate swollen siphunculi, apterae without sensoria on third antennal segment, cauda bearing five hairs and well developed lateral frontal tubercles (Heie 1986). It is associated with Rosa spp. and other plants, e.g., Ericales: Ericaceae. It can be considered a monotypic species, or divided into 2 subspecies, which present very similar morphological features: Wahlgreniella nervata nervata and W. nervata arbuti (Davidson, 1910). The nominotypical subspecies is heteroecious holocyclic between Rosa spp. and species of Ericaceae (Stroyan 1979); or paramonoecious anholocyclic on Rosa spp. (Blackman & Eastop 2006) and it is primarily North American. Wahlgreniella n. arbuti is monoecious anholocyclic on Ericaceae (Arbutus, Arctostaphylos and Pieris) as well as Empetraceae (Empetrum) species and it is primarily European.

It has been recorded from several countries (or territories) of Europe: under W. nervata: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Britain Is., Canary Is., Sicily and mainland Spain ( http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=56351); under W. n. arbuti (a subspecies of W. nervata): Greece (Tsitsipis et al. 2007), Balearic Is., Corsica, mainland France, mainland Italy, Madeira, Portugal and Sardinia ( http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=56349); the Americas: Canada (Heie 1994), Colorado, USA (Gillette 1908), Mexico (Heie 1994), Argentina (Nieto Nafria et al. 1994), Brazil (Smith & Cermeli 1979), Chile (Eastop et al. 1997) and Peru (Mallqui & Cobian 2011); and other continents: Turkey (Barjadze et al. 2011), Iran (Rezwani 2001), Israel (Halperin et al. 1988), Burundi, Africa (Blackman & Eastop 2000), including Quetta-Pakistan (Naumann-Etienne & Remaudière 1995). Hitherto this aphid species has not been reported from India.

During a regular survey, apterous and alate viviparous females of an unknown aphid colony were observed infesting rose at Bengaluru, India, i.e., at the homestead garden of Sanjay Nagar, Dec 2011 by Sunil Joshi, and in an experimental field of the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Mar 2012 by D. Lokeshwari (Fig. 1). Aphids were found on the leaves, tender shoots and young flower buds of cultivated Rosa sp. The aphids excreted honeydew and left their exuviae on the leaves and flower buds. Natural enemies of common occurrence on other species of aphids on rose, viz., Betasyrphus linga Ghorpade (Diptera: Syrphidae), Ischiodon scutellaris F. (Diptera: Syrphidae) and Cheilomenes sexmaculata F. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) were observed to feed on these aphids. No serious damage was observed as the infestation level was kept low by the natural enemies.

Fig. 1.

Late instar nymph (left) and apterous viviparous female (right) of Wahlgreniella nervata (Gillette) on rose

f01_162.jpg

Live aphids along with the plant material were transferred to the laboratory. Specimens were collected and preserved in 70% ethanol at -20 °C. Morphological identifications were carried out prior to molecular studies (Blackman & Eastop 2000); examinations showed that the aphid characteristics matched those of W. nervata. The viviparous apterous females were deposited as microscopic slide-mounted specimens at National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, Bengaluru. Literature searches indicated that this is the first report of the occurrence of W. nervata in India and this species is a new inclusion for Indian aphid fauna.

Diagnostic characters for identifying W. nervata (Gillette), Macrosiphum rosae (Linnaeus) and Sitobion rosaeiformis (Das) are given in Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 respectively. The pictured specimen was stained during the slide mounting process to facilitate illustration of important characters.

Over the centuries, identification of insect pests has remained a challenging task (Joshi & Lokeshwari 2013). Accurate and rapid identification of invasive aphid species like W. nervata is important in order to evolve effective management practices, develop biological control programs and detect invasive quarantine pest species introduced into countries along with agricultural products at the port of entry. Molecular identification comes in handy at this juncture and aids in quick identification of insect pests. Hence, in this study morphological identification corroborated with molecular methods to identify W. nervata from other major aphid species on rose are provided along with its host plants, distribution and natural enemies.

Fig. 2.

Diagnostic characters for identification of W. nervata (Gillette) collected on rose.

f02_162.jpg

For molecular identification, total genomic DNA was extracted from single individuals using CTAB method (Stewart et al. 1993) and PCR was carried out in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf, New York, USA) with the following cycling parameters; 94 °C for 3 min as initial denaturation followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 47 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 20 min as final extension using primers specific to mtCOI, viz., LCO-1490F; 5′-GGT CAA CAA ATC ATA AAG ATA TTG G-3′and HCO-2198R; 5′-TAA ACT TCA GGG TGA CCA AAA AAT CA-3′(Hebert et al. 2004). PCR was performed in 25 µL total reaction volume containing 10 picomoles of each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo scientific, USA). The amplified products were resolved in 1.0% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (10 µg/mL) and visualized in a gel documentation system (Syngene, USA).

The PCR amplified fragments were eluted using Nucleospin® Extract II according to the manufacturer's protocol (Machery-Nagel, Germany) and ligated into the general purpose-cloning vector, InsT/Aclone; transformation was carried out according to manufacture's protocol (Fermentas, Germany) and blue/white selection was done. All the white colonies (with insert) were maintained on LBA containing ampicillin (100 mg/mL), incubated at 37 °C overnight and stored at 4 °C. Plasmids were isolated from the overnight culture of 5 randomly selected positive colonies cultured in LB broth using GeneJET™ Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Fermentas, Germany) according to manufacturer's protocol. Sequencing was carried out in an automated sequencer (ABI Prism® 3730 XL DNA Analyzer; Applied Biosystems, USA) using M13 universal primers both in forward and reverse directions.

The gene mtCOI was successfully sequenced from an individual of W. nervata. Comparison of the triplicate sequences showed no evidence of mismatch, indicated there were no sequencing errors. Homology search was carried out using BLAST ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Both the sequence and collection data of W. nervata were entered in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), GenBank under the accession number KF285590. Sequence generated in the present study along with other major aphid species on rose, viz., Ericaphis wakibae (Hottes), Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker), Macrosiphum impatientis (Williams), Sitobion rosivorum (Zhang), Macrosiphum rosae (Linnaeus) and Pentalonia nigronervosa (Coquerel) (as outgroup) (Retrieved from NCBI) were aligned using Clustal W program in BioEdit V7. 0. Phylogenetic analysis of aligned sequences was done using MEGA. V5. 0. (Tamura et al. 2011). The method of neighbor-joining (NJ) with the Kimura two-parameter model (Kimura 1980) was utilized to build the phylogenetic tree. To assess the robustness of the tree, 1000 bootstrap replicates were selected.

Fig. 3.

Diagnostic characters for identification of Macrosiphum rosae (Linnaeus) collected on rose.

f03_162.jpg

The phylogenetic tree demonstrated genetic distinction of the species with bootstrap values greater than 70% (Fig. 5). Rose aphids formed 2 major groups; W. nervata and E. wakibae clustered to form Group I, while M. dirhodum, M. impatientis, S. rosivorum and M. rosae clustered to form Group II. Pairwise alignment of mtCOI sequence of W. nervata collected from India showed 1.37–1.98% variation (mean divergence of 1.68%, SE 0.043%) corresponding to an average of 11 base changes with those collected from USA and Canada (available at NCBI database) indicating it is not a single cosmopolitan species (Davidson 1910) and requires further investigation to ensure the same. The sequence divergence between the genus Wahlgreniella and others, viz., Ericaphis, Metopolophium, Macrosiphum and Sitobion ranged 3.49–5.77% (mean divergence of 4.63%, SE 0.163%) indicating W. nervata is more closely related to E. wakibae (96.5% homology) than to M. dirhodum (95%), M. impatientis (94.7%), S. rosivorum (94.4%) and M. rosae (94.2%). In addition, the study showed that mtCOI sequences are consistent among species and is able to differentiate the species well; thus it proves to be a useful tool for identification of aphids.

It was also observed that B. linga, I. scutellaris and C. sexmaculata as predators of W. nervata manage this aphid in field sites at Bengaluru, India. Although this species has been considered to be of invasive nature (CAB Intl. 2013), it has not assumed serious proportions at the locations involved in the present study. Also the aphid is not known to transmit any viral diseases, and thus it is of less economic significance. However, our study will aid in proper quarantine measures from the view point of biosecurity.

Fig. 4.

Diagnostic characters for identification of Sitobion rosaeiformis (Das) collected on rose.

f04_162.jpg

Fig 5.

Neighbor joining tree of W. nervata with other major rose aphids for partial sequences of CO-I with bootstrap support (1000 replicates). Bootstrap values greater than 60% are indicated above the branches. Pentolonia nigronervosa was used as outgroup.

f05_162.jpg

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Director, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru for encouragement and providing facilities to carry out the research. Thanks to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi for financial support through the National Agricultural Innovative Project on the National Agricultural Bioinformatics Grid. Our sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions and comments helped in improving this article. This paper is a part of doctoral degree work of the second author.

References Cited

  1. S. Barjadze , I. Karaca , B. Yasar , and N. Gratiashvili 2011. Note on Wahlgreniella nervata (Gillette, 1908) (Hemiptera: Aphididae): a new pest of Damask rose in Turkey. Phytoparasitica 39: 239–241. Google Scholar

  2. R. L. Blackman, and V. F. Eastop 2000. Aphids on the world's crops. An identification guide. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar

  3. R. L. Blackman , and V. F. Eastop 2006. Aphid's on The World's Herbaceous Plants and Shrubs: An Identification and Information Guide. Wiley, Chichester, UK. 1460pp. Google Scholar

  4. Cab International. 2013. Crop Protection Compendium. Wallingford, UK; CAB International. Google Scholar

  5. S. Chakrabarti , and A. Sarkar 2001. A supplement to the food plant catalogue of Indian Aphididae (Homoptera). J. Aphidol. 15: 9–62. Google Scholar

  6. W. M. Davidson 1910. Further notes on the Aphididae collected in the vicinity of Stanford University. J. Econ. Entomol. 3: 372–381. Google Scholar

  7. V. F. Eastop , O. E. Heie , E. Fuentes Contreras , J. Pettersson , and H. M. Niemeyer 1997. Notes on two new aphid species (Hemiptera: Aphididae) detected in Chile. Rev. Chilena Entomol. 24: 81–84. Google Scholar

  8. C. P. Gillette 1908. New species of Colorado Aphididae, with notes upon their life-habits. Canadian Entomol. 40: 61–68. Google Scholar

  9. J. Halperin , A. Binazzi , and E. Swirski 1988. Additional species of Aphidoidea in Israel Phytoparasitica, 16(3): 231–237. Google Scholar

  10. P. D. N. Hebert , E. H. Penton , J. M. Burns , D. H. Janzen , and W. Hallwachs 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 14812–14817. Google Scholar

  11. O. E. Heie 1994. The Aphidoidea (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. V (Family Aphididae: Part 2 of tribe Macrosiphini of subfamily Aphidinae). Fauna Entomol. Scand. 28: 1–242. Google Scholar

  12. O. E. Heie 1986. The Aphidoidea (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. III. Family Aphididae: subfamily Pterocommatinae and tribe Aphidini of subfamily Aphidinae. Fauna Entomol. Scand, vol. 17. E.J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press, Leiden. 314 pp. Google Scholar

  13. S. Joshi , D. Lokeshwari , N.K. Krishna Kumar and A. Verghese 2013. A pictorial guide for the identification of some major aphid species. Technical folder No. 1, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, Bangalore—560024. Google Scholar

  14. M. Kimura 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:11–120. Google Scholar

  15. K. V. Mallqui , and C. V. Cobian 2011. Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) at the Callejón de Huaylas-Ancash, Perú. Ecol. Api. 10: 93–98. Google Scholar

  16. K Naumann-Etienne , and G. Remaudière 1995. A commented preliminary checklist of the aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) of Pakistan and their host plants. Parasitica 51(1): 1–61. Google Scholar

  17. J. M. Nieto Nafria , M. A. Delfini , and M. P. Mier Durante 1994. La afidofauna de la Argentina, su conocimiento en 1992. Secretariado de Publicaciones Universidad de Leon, Leon. 235 pp. Google Scholar

  18. D. N. Raychaudhuri 1983. Food Plant Catalogue of Indian Aphididae. Aphidol. Soc. India. 202 pp. Google Scholar

  19. A. Rezwani 2001. Key to the aphids (Homoptera: Aphidinea) in Iran. Tehran, Iran: Agric. Res., Educ. Ext. Org. Tehran, Iran. 305 pp. Google Scholar

  20. C. F. Smith and M. M. Cermeli 1979. An annotated list of Aphididae (Homoptera) of the Caribbean Islands and South and Central America. North Carolina Agric. Res. Serv., Tech. Bull. 259: 1–131. Google Scholar

  21. C. N. Stewart Jr , and L. E. Via 1993. BioTechniques, 14: 748–758. Google Scholar

  22. H. L. G. Stroyan 1979. Additions to the British aphid fauna. Zool. J. Linn Soc. 65: 1–54. Google Scholar

  23. K. Tamura , D. Peterson , N. Peterson , G. Stecher , M. Nei , and S. Kumar 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2731–2739. Google Scholar

  24. J. A. Tsitsipis , N. I. Katis , J. T. Margaritopoulos , D. P. Lykouressis , A. D. Avgelis , I. Gargalianou , et al. 2007. A contribution to the aphid fauna of Greece. Bull. Insectol. 60: 31–38. Google Scholar

Sunil Joshi, D. Lokeshwari, N. K. Krishna Kumar, H. Manjunatha, Abraham Verghese, and S. K. Jalali "Wahlgreniella nervata (Hemiptera: Aphididae), a New Pest of Rose in India," Florida Entomologist 97(1), 162-167, (1 March 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0122
Published: 1 March 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top