Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2014 Effect of Soil Moisture on the Persistence and Efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) Against Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) Larvae
Author Affiliations +

The efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar) infective juveniles (IJs) was evaluated against third instar Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae) under laboratory conditions in a sandy clay soil at various levels of soil moisture. Three experiments were performed in which the efficacy of the IJs against A. ludens was estimated, i.e., (a) at 6 different levels of soil moisture, (b) in soil that was allowed to lose moisture over a 15 day period, and (c) in soil with an initial moisture content of 16% and in which moisture loss was partially mitigated by adding water at 5-day intervals. In the first experiment, the greatest A. ludens mortality (80%) was observed in soil with 18% moisture (-63.1 bars), although this was not significantly greater than A. ludens mortality at 21% moisture (-20.4 bars). At 24% soil moisture (-7.70 bars), percentage of mortality of A. ludens declined to about 50%. Likewise insect mortality was substantially lower at soil moisture levels of 15% (-240.1 bars) and 12% (-1,232 bars) and very much lower (about 16%) at 9% soil moisture (-10,147 bars). In the second experiment, as soil moisture declined from 16% to less than 10% over a 15 day period, the infectivity of IJs, as indicated by A. ludens larval mortality, progressively declined from more than 55% to less than 10%. In the third experiment, in which moisture loss was partially mitigated by adding water at 5-day intervals, the decline in infectivity of IJs was gradual up to 21 days, but decreased thereafter. We conclude that soil moisture levels must be carefully considered when applying H. bacteriophora IJs to control A. ludens under field conditions, because soil moisture has a marked effect on the efficacy of IJs for the biological control of this pest.

Entomopathogenic nematodes have great potential for the control of different types of agricultural insect pests (Klein 1990; Georgis 1992). Variations in the infectivity and specificity of infective juveniles (IJs) of these nematodes are influenced by diverse factors, including behavior, physiology, geographic origin and physical factors of the habitat (Doucet et al. 1996; Ehlers & Gerwien 1993; Kaya 1990). In the case of host density, the efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora IJs applied against A. ludens under field conditions was affected by larval host density in a sandyclay soil (Toledo et al. 2006a).

Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Nematode: Heterorhabditidae) is currently used to control a variety of agricultural insect pests (Klein 1990; Georgis 1992), and previous studies have indicated that certain strains have the potential to infect tephritid fruit fly larvae including Anastrepha ludens (Loew), A. obliqua (MacQuart), A. serpentina (Wiedemann) and A. fraterculus (Loew) (Toledo et al. 2005a, 2005b, 2006a, 2006b; Barbosa-Negrisoli et al. 2009).

In Mexico, A. ludens is the most severe pest of citrus fruits and mango, and it is responsible for direct damage and indirect losses resulting from the severe quarantine restrictions that many countries impose against the importation of fruit from A. ludens infested areas (Aluja 1994). The management of pestiferous tephritid populations tends to focus on an integrated approach involving chemical, biological and cultural control practices (Reyes et al. 2000), rather than depending entirely on chemical pesticide-based control measures.

Lezama-Gutiérrez et al. (1996) evaluated different species of nematodes against A. ludens in soil with 15% moisture content under laboratory conditions. Fly larvae were moderately to highly susceptible to infection whereas pupae were mostly resistant to infection. However, when adults emerged from pupae and passed through IJ-treated soil, an increased prevalence of infection was observed, indicating that infection could occur during adult emergence (Toledo et al. 2005b). Similarly, A. suspensa larvae and adults were also susceptible to several species of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) in sterile petri dishes lined with filter paper under laboratory conditions (Beavers & Calkins 1984).

Soil moisture is of key importance for the survival, displacement and infectivi ty of IJs targeted at soil dwelling pests (Kung et al. 1991; Molyneux & Bedding 1984). As tephritid fruit flies pupate in soil they could be controlled by application of IJs if soil conditions, particularly moisture, favored the action of these organisms. The main objective of this study was to determine the influence of soil moisture content on the efficacy and persistence of H. bacteriophora IJs against A. ludens third instars in a sandy-clay soil.

Material and Methods

Biological Material

Anastrepha ludens larvae were obtained from the mass-rearing facility at the Moscafrut Plant (SAGARPA-IICA) at Metapa de Domínguez, Chiapas, Mexico, where the colony was maintained as described by Domínguez et al. (2010).

The H. bacteriophora strain used in this study originated from soil samples taken in Costa Rica (Castillo & Marbán-Mendoza 1996). The nematode was reared in larvae of Galleria mellonella L. (Pyralidae) and IJs were collected using White traps (Woodring & Kaya 1998). IJs were counted with a binocular dissecting microscope (10 counts per suspension) and adjusted to a density of 800 IJs/mL sterile distilled water. IJs suspensions were maintained at 10 ± 2 °C for a maximum of 4 wk until required for experiments (Woodring & Kaya 1998). During this period the mortality of the IJs was minimal (< 3.0%). These suspensions were adjusted to the densities required in each of following experiments.

Soil was obtained from the ‘Viva México’ mango orchard (N 14° 54′ 42″ -W 92° 20′ 05″) at 78 m asl between the towns of Tapachula and Huixtla, Chiapas State, Mexico. No insecticide had been applied to this soil during the previous 5 yr. This soil comprised 74% sand, 14% silt, 12% clay, and 2% organic material with a pH of 6.4 (Toledo et al. 2006a). Soil was sieved (mesh 18), placed in bags and heated to 121 °C for 15 min. After this, it was dried in trays at room temperature, placed in an oven at 100 °C for 24 h, allowed to cool, and sealed in plastic containers until required for experiments.

The Effect of Soil Moisture in Relation to the Nematode Activity

Soil moisture content was adjusted to 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24% (wt/wt). The matrix potential of the soil was determined using the pressure membrane technique. Soil-water retention curves were used to calculate the matrix potential at each percentage of soil moisture (range, 9–24%) (Brady & Weil 2003). The matrix potentials of the experimental soil were -10,147, -1,232, -240.1, -63.1, -20.4 and -7.70 bars, respectively. Experimental units consisted of a 5-cm-diam PVC cylinder (19.6 cm2 exposed surface area) containing 120 g (dry wt) of soil. To avoid moisture loss each tube was covered with a Petri dish lid (6 cm diam). Twenty five A. ludens third instar larvae were placed on the surface of each tube and allowed to burrow into the soil for 10 min. By a pipette 2,350 IJs were then applied in 1 mL of sterile distilled water at a concentration of 120 IJs/cm2 of soil surface and uniformly distributed over the soil surface. Tubes were incubated at 26 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 5% RH, and 12:12 h L:D photoperiod. Seven days after inoculation, the soil from each tube was sieved gently (mesh 18) to separate larvae and pupae. Infection was determined by observation with a binocular dissecting microscope. The experiment was replicated 6 times.

Persistence of Infectivity over Time

Bioassays were performed using a single concentration of 120 IJs/cm2 of soil surface as described above. This rate was estimated to result in 50% mortality of A. ludens third instars larvae in a previous study (Toledo et al. 2006a). Two hundred and fifty PVC tubes were each prepared with 120 g soil adjusted to 16% moisture content (estimated matrix potential -185.0 bar). The soil surface of each tube was then inoculated with IJ's in 1 mL water. Tubes were then placed in a bioclimatic chamber and kept in darkness at 26 ± 1 °C and 70 ± 5% RH.

Each day for 15 days, 5 experimental units were taken at random and 25 A. ludens third instar larvae were placed on the soil surface of each tube and allowed to burrow into the soil. These tubes were then returned to the bioclimatic chamber and incubated for a further 7 days, after which soil was sieved and insects were examined for infection. Control experimental units were treated identically but not inoculated with IJs. Simultaneously, each day, a subsample was taken and weighed before being heated. The soil was heated in an oven at 100 °C until constant weight was achieved and the amount of water that was lost by weight was calculated to estimate moisture content.

Persistence of IJ Efficacy When Soil Moisture Loss Was Partially Mitigated by Adding Water at 5-Day Intervals

To examine the influence of periodic application of water to experimental soil units on the persistence of IJs infectivity, a total of 330 tubes were prepared as described in the previous experiment. Tubes were incubated at 26 ± 1 °C and 70 ± 5% RH and 5 mL of water was applied to each tube at 5 day intervals. As before, IJs were inoculated onto the soil surface of each tube at the beginning of the study and A. ludens larvae were applied to randomly selected tubes at daily intervals and incubated for 7 days. As in the previous experiment, moisture content was determined at daily intervals. The experiment lasted 21 days.

Data Analysis

The results of the first experiment were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by means separation using the Tukey test (P > 0.05) (SAS Institute 2003). To describe the relation between the larval mortality (dependent variable) and the loss of soil moisture (independent variable), the results of the second and third experiments were subjected to a semi-logarithmic regression considering the relation between the larval mortality with 2 variables that were soil moisture (in a range of 9 to 16%) and exposure time (in a range of 1 to 15 days for the first experiment and 1 to 21 days for the second experiment). The analysis was performed using JMP Statistical Discovery Software (SAS Institute 2003).


The Effect of Soil Moisture on IJ Efficacy

Soil moisture had a significant effect on IJ infectivity (F = 19.48; df = 5, 29; P < 0.001). Soil moistures between 12% (-1,232 bars) and 21% (-20.4 bars) resulted in over 50% of mortality of A. ludens when IJs were applied at a concentration of 120 IJs/cm2, with the highest mortality observed in the 18% moisture (-63.1 bars) treatment (Fig. 1). More extreme values of soil moisture, both dryness (9%; -10,147 bars) or wetness (24%; -7.70 bars), resulted in less than 50% mortality of A. ludens; an effect that was particularly evident in the 9% moisture treatment.

Fig. 1.

The effect of the different soil moisture levels on the efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora against Anastrepha ludens larvae in a sandy clay soil, (n = 150 larvae/ treatment). The error bars represent the standard error. The matrix potentials of the experimental soil with moisture levels of 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24% were -10,147, -1,232, -240.1, -63.1, -20.4 and -7.70 bars, respectively,


IJ Infectivity in Soil over Time

Mortality of A. ludens larvae was highest (56.8–56.0%) in larvae exposed to inoculated soil at 2 and 3 days post-inoculation (Fig. 2). Larval mortality decreased significantly over time (r2 = 0.785; F = 45.59; df = 1, 13; P < 0.001). After 3 days post-inoculation, mortality values began to decline and remained below 10% in larvae exposed to contaminated soil. By the end of the experiment, soil moisture had fallen from 16% to a final value of 9.9%.

Fig. 2.

Mortality of Anastrepha ludens larvae caused by Heterorhabditis bacteriophora IJs in a sandy clay soil undergoing the loss of moisture. The bars represent the standard error of mean mortality. (—) Represents larval mortality and (----) represents the soil moisture level.


Persistence of IJ Efficacy When Soil Moisture Loss Was Partially Mitigated by Adding Water at 5-Day Intervals

The mortality value was highest (70.4%) in A. ludens larvae exposed to inoculated soil at 1 day post-inoculation (Fig. 3). The prevalence of mortality in the insects declined significantly over the 21 days of the study (r2 = 0.866; F = 122.60; df = 1, 19; P < 0.001). Despite not greatly affecting overall soil moisture levels, periodic addition of 5 ml water to the soil surface increased of IJ-induced mortality in A. ludens by 10–20% at most time points, compared to mortality values observed in the previous experiment. Soil moisture levels over the course of the experiment varied from 16% at day 1 to 7.9% moisture at day 20 post-inoculation.


The efficacy of H. bacteriophora IJs against A. ludens third instar larvae in a sandy-clay soil was dependent on soil moisture. Soil moisture levels of 18–21% (-63.1 to -20.4 bars) resulted in the greatest efficacy, in terms of prevalence of infection; significantly fewer infections occurred at higher or lower moisture values.

Several isolates of H. bacteriophora have been shown to produce high mortalities in fruit fly larvae (Barbosa-Negrisoli et al. 2009; Malan & Manrakhan 2009; Toledo et al. 2005a; 2005b; 2006b). For this to occur, IJs have to move through the soil to locate potential hosts (Kung et al. 1991). Such movement can be hindered by soil physicochemical characteristics including texture, soil pore size relative to nematode length, pH, and moisture. These same factors are therefore likely to influence the success of the nematode as a biological control agent in field conditions (Portillo-Aguilar et al. 1999). Soils that differ in moisture content, above all the free water that remains available on the external surface of soil particles, significantly influence the survival and infective capacity of IJs (Barbercheck & Kaya 1991; Molyneux & Bedding 1984; Koppenhöfer et al. 1995; Fujiie et al. 1996). For example, in green june beetle larvae (Cotinis nitida L.; Scarabaeidae), mortality caused by H. bacteriophora and S. carpocapsae IJs was greater in soils with high moisture levels (30%) compared with soils with 10% moisture content (Townsend et al. 1998).

Fig. 3.

Mortality of Anastrepha ludens larvae caused by Heterorhabditis bacteriophora IJs in a sandy clay soil with an initial moisture content of 16% and in which water loss was partially mitigated by adding water at 5-day intervals. The bars represent the standard error of mean mortality. (—) Represents larval mortality and (----) represents the soil moisture level.


IJ infection of the A. ludens host larvae was verified in pupae in which IJs were observed through the puparium or via dissection. Insects from the control treatment were never observed to contain IJs, natural mortality was low (3%) and 88% of adults emerged from pupae.

Larvae of A. ludens are susceptible to infection by entomopathogenic nematodes such as S. riobravis and S. carpocapse IJs that can cause up to 90% mortality. The NC strain of H. bacteriophora caused up to 83% mortality whereas treatment with S. feltiae and S. carpocapse (Tecomán strain) resulted in up to 81% and 76.0% of mortality of A. ludens. Similarly, H. bacteriophora and S. glaseri caused 53% mortality in A. ludens third instar larvae at 25 fi01_528.gifC in a sandy-textured soil with 15% moisture content (Lezama-Gutiérrez et al. 1996).

The duration over which IJs retained their infectivity in the present study was similar to that observed in a study on H. bacteriophora against A. obliqua larvae that were applied to a sandyclay soil with 16% moisture content, although the infectivity of IJs diminished markedly in the A. obliqua study when soil moisture content was 10% or less (Toledo et al. 2005b). Therefore, soil moisture content appears to be critical for IJ survival and movement through the soil matrix in search of hosts (Kung et al. 1991; Womersley 1990; 1993; Smith 1999; Klein 1990).

Additionally, soil compression can directly influence the biology of insects that pass at least one stage of their lives in the soil. In the case of tephritid fruit flies, the depth to which final instar larvae burrow into the soil will have a clear influence on related variables such as temperature, moisture and also their exposure to biotic variables such as predation, parasitism, pathogens and survival during adult emergence (Jackson et al. 1998).

In our study, IJ dispersal was not differentially limited by the soil texture because we used the same soil for all experiments, a soil type that favored infection by IJs (Toledo et al. 2005b). However, additional factors such as host behavior and activity could also limit the capacity of IJs to localize and infect host larvae (Doucet et al. 1996).

Interestingly, H. bacteriophora IJs remained efficacious for longer and infected more A. ludens larvae when the soil was rehydrated at intervals of 5 days. This occurred despite the fact that periodic applications of 5 mL of water did not greatly influence the mean moisture content of the soil in each experimental container. This may reflect the importance of soil moisture in the upper part of the experimental containers through which A. ludens larvae had to burrow, and the ability of IJs to move efficiently through soil with high moisture content. Movement of IJs is known to be influenced by moisture (Koppenhöfer et al. 1995; Fujiie et al. 1996), temperature (Kung et al. 1991), texture and soil density (Barbercheck & Kaya 1991; Portillo-Aguilar et al. 1999).

In this study we confirmed that infection by IJs was favored at intermediate moisture levels in a sandy-clay texture soil. Periodic dampening of soil, such as occurs during rainfall, resulted in increased infection and extended the duration of IJ infectivity. The results of these laboratory experiments require validation in field tests in areas in which A. ludens is a serious pest of fruit crops, such as the mango and citrus growing regions of Mexico.


We thank Milton A. Rasgado, Azucena Oropeza, and Gustavo Rodas for technical support, and Javier Valle for statistical advice (El Colegio de la Frontera Sur). The Moscafrut Program (SAGARPA-IICA) supplied biological material.

References Cited

  1. M. Aluja 1994. Bionomics and management of Anastrepha. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 155–178. Google Scholar

  2. M. E. Barbercheck , and H. K. Kaya 1991. Effect of host condition and soil texture on host finding by the entomopathogenic nematodes Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) and Steinernema carpocapsae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae). Environ. Entomol. 20: 582–589. Google Scholar

  3. C. R. C. Barbosa-Negrisoli , M. S. Garcia , C. Dolinski, A. S. Negrisoli Jr. , D. Bernardi , and D. E. Nava 2009. Efficacy of indigenous entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Heteorhabditidae, Steinenematidae), from Rio Grande do Sul Brazil, against Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in peach orchards. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 102: 6–13. Google Scholar

  4. J. B. Beavers and C. O. Calkins 1984. Susceptibility of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to steinernematid and heterorhabditid nematodes in laboratory studies. Environ. Entomol. 13: 137–139. Google Scholar

  5. N. C. Brady , and R. R. Weil 2003. The nature and properties of soils. 14th ed. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. Google Scholar

  6. A. Castillo , and N. Marbán-Mendoza 1996. Evaluación en laboratorio de nemátodos steinernematidos y heterorhabditidos para el control biológico de la broca del café, Hypothenemus hampei Ferr. Nematropica. 26: 100–109. Google Scholar

  7. J. Domínguez , T. Artiaga-López , E. Solís , and E. Hernández 2010. Métodos de colonización y cría masiva, pp. 259–276. In : P. Montoya , J. Toledo and E. Hernández . [Eds.]. Moscas de la Fruta: Fundamentos y Procedimientos para su Manejo . S y G Editores. Mexico City, Mexico. Google Scholar

  8. M. M. Doucet , A. De. Miranda , M. A. Bertolotti , and K. A. Caro 1996. Efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (strain OLD in relation to temperature, concentration and origin of the infective juveniles. Nematropica. 26: 129–133. Google Scholar

  9. R. V. Ehlers , and A. Gerwien 1993. Selection of entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae, Nematoda) for the biological control of crane fly larvae Tipula paludosa (Tipulidae, Díptera). J. Plant Dis. Prot. 100: 343–353. Google Scholar

  10. A. Fujiie , Y. Takata , M. Tachibana , and T. Yokoyama 1996. Insecticidal activity of an entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema kushidai (Nematoda: Steinernematidae), against Anomala cuprea (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larvae under different soil moisture conditions. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 31: 453–454. Google Scholar

  11. R. Georgis 1992. Present and future prospects for entomopathogenic nematode products. Biocontr. Sci. Tecnol. 2: 83–99. Google Scholar

  12. C. G. Jackson , J. P. Long , and L. M. Klungness 1998. Depth of pupation in four species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in sand with and without moisture. J. Econ. Entomol. 91: 138–142. Google Scholar

  13. H. K. Kaya 1990. Soil ecology, pp. 93–115. In : R. Gaugler and H. K. Kaya [eds.]. Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida. Google Scholar

  14. M. G. Klein 1990. Efficacy against soil-inhabiting insect pests, pp. 195–214. In : R. Gaugler and H. K. Kaya . [eds.]. Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, Florida. Google Scholar

  15. A. M. Koppenhöfer , H. K. Kaya , and S. P. Taormino 1995. Infectivity of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) at different soil depths and moisture. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 65: 193–199. Google Scholar

  16. S. P. Kung , R. Gaugler , and H. K. Kaya 1991. Effects of soil temperature, moisture, and relative humidity on entomopathogenic nematode persistence. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 57: 242–249. Google Scholar

  17. R. Lezama-Gutiérrez , J. Molina , O. Contrerasochoa , and L. OSCAR 1996. Susceptibilidad de larvas de Anastrepha ludens (Díptera: Tephritidae) a diversos nemátodos entomopatógenos (Steinernematidae y Heterorhabditidae). Vedalia 3: 31–34. Google Scholar

  18. P. M. Malan , and A. Manrakhan 2009. Susceptibility of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) and the Natal fruit fly (Ceratitis rosa) to entomopathogenic nematodes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 100: 447–49. Google Scholar

  19. A. S. Molyneux , and R. A. Bedding 1984. Influence of soil texture and moisture on the infectivity of Heterorhabditis sp. Dl and Steinernema glas er i for larvae of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Nematologica 30: 358–365. Google Scholar

  20. G. Portillo-Aguilar , M. G. Villani , M. J. Tauber , G. A. Tauber , and J. P. Nyrop 1999. Entomopathogenic nematode (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae) response to soil texture and bulk density. Environ. Entomol. 28: 1021–1035. Google Scholar

  21. J. Reyes , G. Santiago , and P. Hernandez 2000. Mexican fruit fly eradication programme, pp. 377–380. In : K. H. Tan [ed.]. Area-wide Control of Fruit Flies and others Insect Pests. Penerbit University Saints. Malaysia, Penang. Google Scholar

  22. SAS Institute. 2003. JMP 5.0.1 The Statistical Discovery Software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA. Google Scholar

  23. K. Smith 1999. Factors affecting efficacy, pp. 37–43. In S. Polavarapu [ed.], Optimal use of insecticidad nematodes in pest management. Brunswich, New Jersey, Rutgers University. Google Scholar

  24. J. Toledo , J. E. Ibarra , P. Liedo , A. Gómez , M. A. Rasgado , and T. Williams 2005a. Infection of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae by Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) under laboratory and field conditions. Biocontol Sci. Technol. 15: 627–634. Google Scholar

  25. J. Toledo , G. Martínez , P. Liedo , and J. E. Ibarra 2005b. Susceptibilidad de larvas de Anastrepha obliqua Macquart (Díptera: Tephritidae) a Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Poinar) (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) en condiciones de laboratorio. Vedalia 12: 11–22. Google Scholar

  26. J. Toledo , M. A. Rasgado , J. E. Ibarra , A. Gómez , P. Liedo , and T. Williams 2006a. Infection of Anastrepha ludens following soil applications of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora in a mango orchard. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 119: 155–162. Google Scholar

  27. J. Toledo , R. Rojas , and J. E. Ibarra 2006b. Efficiency of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Nematoda: Heterorhabditidae) on Anastrepha serpentina (Diptera: Tephritidae) larvae under laboratory conditions. Florida Entomol. 89: 524–526. Google Scholar

  28. M. L. Townsend , D. T. Johnson , and D. C. Steinkraus 1998. Laboratory studies of the interactions of environmental conditions on the susceptibility of green June beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to entomopathogenic nematodes. J. Entomol. Sci. 33: 40–48. Google Scholar

  29. G. Z. Womersley 1990. Dehydration and anhydrobiotic potential, pp. 117–137. In : R. Gaugler and H. K. Kaya [eds.]. Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRS Press. Google Scholar

  30. G. Z. Womersley 1993. Factors affecting physiological fitness and modes of survival employed by dauer juveniles and their relationship to pathogenicity, pp. 79–88. In : R. Bedding , R. Akhurst and H. Kaya [eds.]. Nematodes and the biological control of insect pest. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO. Google Scholar

  31. J. L. Woodring , and H. K. Kaya 1998. Steinernematid and Heterorhabditid Nematodes: A Handbook of Biology and Techniques. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Southern Cooperative Series, Bulletin 331 . Google Scholar

Jorge Toledo, José E. Sánchez, Trevor Williams, Anaximandro Gómez, Pablo Montoya, and Jorge E. Ibarra "Effect of Soil Moisture on the Persistence and Efficacy of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) Against Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) Larvae," Florida Entomologist 97(2), (1 June 2014).
Published: 1 June 2014

Back to Top