Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2014 A Taxonomic Review of Stachyotis (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea: Plutellidae) with Description of a New Species from China
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The genus Stachyotis (Lepidoptera, Yponomeutoidea, Plutellidae) is reviewed by re-description of the type species, Stachyotis epichrysa Meyrick from Sri Lanka and description of a new species, S. chunshengwui sp. nov. from China. These 2 congeners are distinguished from each other in their forewing patterns and male genitalia. The diagnostic features of Stachyotis are proposed from the forewing venation, structures of the second sternite and the tergites, and the male genitalia. A possible association of Stachyotis and Orthenchesgroup is discussed.

The genus Stachyotis was originally described in Plutellidae by Meyrick (1905). Since then, the systematic position of the genus has not been revised. Kyrki (1984) characterized Plutellidae (Plutella-group auct) by the presence of the curved teguminal processes surrounding the anal tube in the male genitalia. This character is not found in Stachyotis. Meyrick (1905) suggested that the genus may be related to Orthenches that he believed also belonged to Plutellidae. In accordance with his opinion, Stachyotis is treated as a plutellid genus in this study, although the plutellid association of Orthenches needs further attention (Dugdale 1996).

Meyrick (1905) defined Stachyotis, based on the head, hindleg, and wing venation characteristics. These superficial features are apparently insufficient to differentiate the genus from other similar yponomeutoids. Stachyotis includes only the type species, S. epichrysa Meyrick, 1905, from Sri Lanka. This species has never been illustrated or described with genital features, which are often crucial in defining taxonomic relationships. Nothing is known about the biology of Stachyotis. Because the yponomeutoid fauna of the Oriental Region is poorly known (Lewis & Sohn, in preparation), there may exist other congeners in the region, especially on the Indochina Peninsula.

The aims of this paper are to re-describe Stachyotis and its type species, Stachyotis epichrysa Meyrick, to describe a new congener from southern China, and to discuss the morphological similarities between Stachyotis and the Orthenches-group sensu Dugdale (1996). The abbreviations in the specimen data are as follows:

BMNH (Natural History Museum, London, UK); GSN (genitalia slide number); and USNM (National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA).

Systematic Account

  • Stachyotis Meyrick

    Stachyotis Meyrick, 1905: 612.

    Type species: Stachyotis epichrysa Meyrick, 1905, by monotypy.

  • Diagnosis

    The yponomeutoid association of this genus is substantiated by having 2 autapomorphies for the superfamily: the presence of the posteriorly expanded male pleuron VIII, also known as pleural lobes, and the transverse ridge near the posterior margin of sternite II. Stachyotis is similar to Rhabdocosma Meyrick, 1935 (Ypsolophidae) in the shape of the pleural lobes but differs from the latter in the male genitalia: processes on uncus in addition to socii present in Stachyotis, absent in Rhabdocosma; gnathos acuminate medially, upcurved in Stachyotis, with linguiform medial plate in Rhabdocosma; and saccus longer in Stachyotis than in Rhabdocosma. The diagnostic features of Stachyotis include the forewing veins CuA1 and CuA2 stalked (Fig. 4); the sternite II with a Vshaped transverse ridge on the posterior margin (Fig. 5); tergites with scattered short setae (Fig. 5); lateral arms of gnathos convergent to medial process (Figs. 10 and 11); and valva divided into 2 portions distally (Figs. 10 and 11).

  • Redescription

    Head (Figs. 1 and 2) with vestiture of vertex appressed with piliform scales; frons with elongate scales; ocelli absent [Meyrick (1905) erroneously stated that Stachyotis possessed ocelli on the head]; antenna filiform in both sexes; flagellomere with 2 whorls of elongate scales; labial palpus slightly upcurved, 1st segment 2 × as long as 2nd, 2nd segment as long as 3rd; maxillary palpus 4-segmented; proboscis naked. Hind tibia (Fig. 3) with piliform scales denser dorsally. Forewing with pterostigma spanning one half of costa and Rs3; costa slightly curved; apex narrowly round; termen slightly concave medially; tornus subtruncate; dorsal margin arched at distal ⅓. Hindwings with costa slightly emarginated near midlength. Forewing venation (Fig. 4) with Sc reaching margin slightly before middle of costa; R arising from near basal ⅖ of radius; Rs1–3 reaching margin above apex; Rs1 arising from anterior margin of accessory cell near midlength, parallel to R; Rs1 parallel to Rs2; Rs2 and Rs3 connate basally, then divergent; Rs4 reaching margin below apex at the anterior ¼ of termen; M with 3 branches; M1 parallel to M2; M3 and M2 close basally, then divergent; CuA1 and CuA2 stalked, reaching dorsal margin; CuA2 slightly curved after stalk; CuP vestigial as fold in basal ¾; basal fork of 1A+2A near ⅓ of length. Hindwing venation (Fig. 4) with Sc+R1 reaching margin at distal 1/4 of costa; Rs reaching margin above apex, slightly arched; M stem vestigial; M1 divergent from Rs; M2 nearly parallel to M3; M3 connate with CuA1; CuA1 parallel to CuA2; CuP present; 1A + 2A slightly divergent from CuP in distal ⅓, with basal fork ⅕ of length. Abdominal tergites (Fig. 5) with minute setae uniformly scattered on entire area. Sternum II (Fig. 5) with apodeme and venula ⅓ as long as pleura II; anterior margin notched and sclerotized medially. Tergum VIII (Fig. 6) fused with pleuron VIII, broadly rounded posteriolaterally, broadly emarginated posteriomedially. Male genitalia with socii and teguminal processes; subscaphium present; gnathos upcurved; valva elongate; saccus as an elongate arm; vesica with cornutal zone comprised of spinules. Female genitalia unknown.

  • Included species

  • Stachyotis chunshengwui Sohn, sp. nov.
    Stachyotis epichrysa Meyrick, 1905
    Stachyotis epichrysa Meyrick
    (Figs. 1, 38, 10)

  • Stachyotis epichrysa Meyrick, 1905: 612.

  • Diagnosis

    This species is similar to Prays peregrina Agassiz, 2007, from England in superficial appearance, but the latter belongs to Praydidae, which can be characterized by the presence of the broadly enlarged male sternum VIII.

  • Redescription

    Head (Fig. 1): Scales on vertex white, with dark brown band subterminally; frons white, tinged with dark brown laterally. Antenna 4/₅ as long as forewing; scape brownish white, scales with dark brown band subterminally; flagellomere pale gray on basal half, dark brownish gray on distal half. Labial palpus 1st segment white, dark brown terminally, with elongate scales ventrally; 2nd segment dark brown, speckled with white laterally, white, sparsely peppered with dark brown mesally; 3rd segment white, tinged with dark brown on basal and apical areas and at middle.

    Thorax: Patagium pale brownish gray; tegula dark brown; mesonotum white, sparsely peppered with dark brown spots on anterior half, dark brownish gray on posterior half. Fore- and midlegs with coxa and femur white, sparsely peppered with dark brown; tibia dark brown, white terminally; tarsomere dark brown, with broad white band at basal ⅓. Hindleg with coxa to tibia pale brownish gray; tibia with long hairs dorsally, spiniform scales ventrally; tarsomere white, densely speckled with dark brownish gray, with dark brownish gray band distally. Forewing length 7.4–8.8 mm (n = 7) slightly dilated distally, white, suffused with pale brownish gray on basal area and anterior ⅘ of costal area, speckled with dark brown; sparse dark brown strigulae near to costa on basal ⅓; subbasal, antemedial and postmedian lines brownish gray, with golden luster, dark brown on dorsum; subbasal line rhomboid; postmedian line slender, sinuous on costal area; fringe dark brown with golden luster. Hindwing pale brownish gray; fringe pale yellowish gray.

    Abdomen: Tergites pale brown; sternites pale orange. Male genitalia (Fig. 10) with uncus trapezoidal, posterior margin emarginated medially, with a digitate process and an elongate, distallycurved, apically-obtuse process posteriolaterally; socius elongate, slender, as long as valva, setose dorsally; V-shaped ridge at junction between uncus and tegumen. Tegumen subtrapezoidal in posterior half, subrectangular in anterior half. Gnathos V-shaped, upcurved medially. Valva elongate, rectangular, divided into 2 setose portions apically, upper portion semicircular, lower portion digitate; sacculus slightly convex. Vinculum subquadrate; saccus slender, 2x longer than valva, dilated terminally. Phallus (Fig. 10a) elongate, slightly curved medially; cornutal zone ⅓ as long as phallus.

  • Type

    HOLOTYPE (Fig. 7) - male, “Holo-type” [circular label with red border], “Maskeliya, Ceylon. Pole. 12.03”, “Meyrick Coll. B.M. 1938-290.”, “Stachyotis epichrysa 2/11 Meyr. E. Meyrick det. in Meyrick Coll.”, “Abdomen missing” [pale blue label], deposited in the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.

  • Material Examined

    [Sri Lanka] 1♂ Maskeliya, “04” (Pole), BMNH, GSN: BM-32855; 1♂, ditto, “10.04” (Pole), USNM. 7♂, North East Prov., Kanda-ela Reservoir, 5.6 mi SW Nuwara Eliya, 6200 ft., 9–21 Feb. 1970 (Davis & Rowe), USNM, GSN: USNM-96420.

  • Distribution

    Sri Lanka (Central, North East).

  • Figs. 1–6.

    Generic characteristics of Stachyotis. 1. head of S. epichrysa; 2. head of S. chunshengwui sp. nov.; 3. hind leg of S. epichrysa; 4. wing venation of S. epichrysa; 5. abdominal segment I-II of S. epichrysa (inset: enlarged tergal setae); 6. abdominal segment VIII of S. epichrysa.

    f01_1588.jpg

    Figs. 7–9.

    Adults of Stachyotis. 7–8. S. epichrysa (7: holotype; 7a: type labels); 9. S. chunshengwui sp. nov., holotype (9a: type labels).

    f07_1588.jpg

    Stachyotis chunshengwui sp. nov.
    (Figs. 2, 9, 11)

  • Diagnosis

    This species closely resembles Stachyotis epichrysa but can be distinguished from the latter in having the forewings with narrower subbasal, antemedian, and postmedian lines and a dark yellowish brown, semicircular patch along the terminal area; the male genitalia with shorter posterior processes on the uncus and upper apical portion of the valva tapering.

  • Description

    Head (Fig. 2): Scales on vertex white, with dark brown tip; frons white. Antenna 2/3 as long as forewing; scape white, intermixed with dark brown scales dorsally; flagellomeres white, annulated with dark brown dorsally. Labial palpus 1st segment dark brown, intermixed with pale brown scales; 2nd and 3rd segments brownish white, mottled with dark brown at middle; scale tuft on 2nd segment, white with dark brown tip.

    Thorax: Patagium and mesonotum dark brown with purplish luster; tegulae white, suffused with dark brown basally and distally. Fore- and midlegs with coxa, femur, and tibia dark brown, intermixed with white scales dorsally, white ventrally; tarsomeres dark brown, with a white ring basally. Hindleg with coxa, femur, and tibia brownish gray dorsally, white ventrally; tibia with gray hairs dorsally, white hairs ventrally; tarsomeres entirely dark brown, except 1st segment white ventrally. Forewing length 6.9 mm (n = 1), white, with dark brown, irregular strigulae along costa and posterior margin; subbasal and antemedian lines dark brown, almost perpendicular to dorsum; postmedian line ½ as wide as medial line, constricted around anterior ⅓, blurred posteriorly; subterminal line dark brown, narrower than and almost parallel to postmedian line; terminal area with semicircular, dark yellowish brown patch; fringe mostly dark brown, white with dark brown tip on tornus Hindwing dark brownish gray, with dark brown streaks along veins; fringe dark yellowish gray.

    Abdomen: Tergites dark gray; sternites pale orange. Male genitalia (Fig. 11) with uncus broad, subhexagonal, with bifid projection posteriorly; each process digitate, sparsely setose; socii 3x longer than posterior uncal processes, slender straight, slightly enlarged terminally, with 2 short spines apically, setose. Tegumen 2 × as long as uncus, relatively narrow, slightly angulated on distal ⅓; medial process of gnathos robust, strongly sclerotized. Valva elongate, relatively narrow, shallowly convex at distal ¼ of costal margin, with a short, digitate process protruding from costal side of apex; a robust, digitate saccular process rising from ½ of valva. Vinculum rectangular; saccus with a narrow basal plate and a slender process 1.5x longer than valva; anellus relatively narrow, with minute setae. Phallus relatively slender, slightly bent medially, 1.5x longer than saccus; cornutal zone ½ as long as phallus.

  • Type

    HOLOTYPE (Fig. 9)—male, “HOLOTYPE Stachyotis chunshengwui Sohn, 2009” [red label], “Guangxi Miaoershan Chinese Academy of Sciences” [in Chinese], “1985.7.14 Collector: Shi Mei Song” [in Chinese], “Genitalia slide IOZ-09047  J. C. Sohn” [green label], deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

  • Distribution

    China (Guangxi).

  • Etymology

    This species is named after Dr. Chun-Sheng Wu who assisted me with my research.

  • Figs. 10–11.

    Male genitalia of Stachyotis. 10. S. epichrysa (10a: phallus), 11. S. chunshengwui sp. nov., holotype (11a: phallus).

    f10_1588.jpg

    Discussion

    Stachyotis has been associated with Plutellidae, since Meyrick (1905, 1914). The evidence justifying this relationship are, however, tenuous. In fact, the genus lacks an autapomorphy of Plutellidae proposed by Kyrki (1984). Kyrki (1990) stated 2 other diagnostic characteristics for Plutellidae from the female genitalia and the shape of cocoon. These cannot be evaluated for Stachyotis because no females and immature stages are known for the genus. Kyrki (1990) characterized Plutellidae based on the Holarctic species (Sohn et al. 2013). Future efforts toward better characterization of Plutellidae need to consider the world species and may find useful characters in evaluating the plutellid association of Stachyotis.

    Meyrick (1905) noted superficial similarities between Stachyotis and Orthenches. Orthenches once included 4 species groups. Dugdale (1996) found that these differ from one another in host plant, cocoon structures, adult external and genital structures. Regarding these differences, he assigned one group including 10 species to a separate genus, Chrysorthenches, and established the Orthenches group including about 25 species from New Zealand, Australia, eastern Pacific and South America. The Orthenches group is similar to Plutellidae in larval and pupal characteristics but differs from the latter in having the male gnathos narrowly fused with the tegumen laterally, and the larval setal group SV unisetose, not bisetose, on the abdominal segment IX (Dugdale 1996). The latter characteristic was suggested as an autapomorphy of the Orthenches group by Dugdale (1996). This feature, however, cannot be evaluated for Stachyotis whose larvae remain unknown. Therefore, an association of Stachyotis with the Orthenches group remains tenuous. Interestingly, Stachyotis shares at least two characteristics with some species of Orthenches from Neotropics (e.g. O. osteacma Meyrick, 1931) in the male genitalia: 2 pairs of processes on uncus, each possibly corresponding to socii and teguminal processes, and an upcurved gnathos. There, however, are several differences between Stachyotis and the Orthenches group (John S. Dugdale 2014, personal communication): i) elongate scale covering on the antennal scape present in several species of the Orthenches group but absent in Stachyotis and Chrysorthenches; ii) the forewing veins CuA1 and CuA2 stalked in Stachyotis, but separate in Orthenches and Chrysorthenches; and iii) the male gnathos absent (Chrysorthenches) or without medial process in Australian and New Zealand species of the Orthenches group, but with an elongate medial process in Stachyotis.

    Acknowledgments

    I would like to thank John S. Dugdale (Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd, Nelson, New Zealand) for his advice and proof-reading my early draft and also Kevin Tuck (Natural History Museum, London) for allowing me to check the museum specimens under his responsibility. I am also very grateful to Chun-Sheng Wu and Dayoung Xue (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing) for allowing me to borrow the specimens from their institution and Mujie Qi (Incheon University, Incheon, Korea) for translating the Chinese label data.

    References Cited

    1.

    D. Agassiz 2007. Prays peregrina sp. n. (Yponomeutidae) a presumed adventive species in Greater London. Nota lepid. 30: 407–410. Google Scholar

    2.

    J. S. Dugdale 1996. Chrysorthenches new genus, conifer-associated plutellid moths (Yponomeutoidea, Lepidoptera) in New Zealand and Australia. New Zealand J. Zool. 23: 33–59. Google Scholar

    3.

    J. Kyrki 1984. The Yponomeutoidea: a reassessment of the superfamily and its suprageneric groups (Lepidoptera). Entomol. Scandinavica 15: 71–84. Google Scholar

    4.

    J. Kyrki 1990. Tentative reclassification of holarctic Yponomeutoidea (Lepidoptera). Nota lepid. 13: 28-42. Google Scholar

    5.

    E. Meyrick 1905. Description of Indian Micro-Lepidoptera. J. Bombay Natl. Hist. Soc. 16: 580–619. Google Scholar

    6.

    E. Meyrick 1914. Lepidopterorum Catalogus. Vol. 19. Hyponomeutidae, Plutellidae and Amphitheridae. Berlin: W. Junk. Google Scholar

    7.

    E. Meyrick 1931. Microlepidoptera from South Chile and Argentina. An. Mus. Hist. Nat. B. Aires 36: 377-415. Google Scholar

    8.

    E. Meyrick 1935. Hyponomeutidae, pp 601–604. In E. Meyrick [ed.], Exotic Microlepidoptera, Vol. 4–5 (1930–36). Middlesex: E. W. Classey Limited. Google Scholar

    9.

    J.-C. Sohn , J. C. Regier , C. Mitter , D. Davis , J.-F. Landry , A. Zwick , and M. P. Cummings 2013. A molecular phylogeny for Yponomeutoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Ditrysia) and its implications for classification, biogeography and the evolution of host plant use. PLoS One 8: e55066. Google Scholar
    Jae-Cheon Sohn "A Taxonomic Review of Stachyotis (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea: Plutellidae) with Description of a New Species from China," Florida Entomologist 97(4), 1588-1593, (1 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0431
    Published: 1 December 2014
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    6 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top