Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2015 First record of Sesbania punicea (Fabales: Fabaceae) as a Host Plant for Chinavia hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)
P. Glynn Tillman
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Sesbania punicea (Cav.) Benth. (Fabales: Fabaceae) plants in a field border surrounding a cotton field were sampled for Chinavia hilaris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) to determine if this leguminous shrub served as a host for this stink bug. Chinavia hilaris adults and nymphs fed on fruit of this plant, and nymphs developed on the plant. This is the first record of S. punicea as a host for this stink bug.

The green stink bug, Chinavia hilaris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), is an economic pest of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. (Malvales: Malvaceae) (Barbour et al. 1990). In the coastal plain of the southeastern USA, cotton is a mid-to-late-season host of C. hilaris (Bundy & McPherson 2000). Feeding on bolls by C. hilaris results in injury to bolls, which can be assessed by examining bolls for internal injury (i.e., warts and stained lint) (Bundy et al. 2000).

Sesbania punicea (Cav.) Benth. (Fabales: Fabaceae) is a deciduous, leguminous shrub that grows up to 4 m tall (Hoffmann & Moran 1998). A native plant of South America, it has been distributed widely as an attractive ornamental to other parts of the world. Escapes from cultivation have led to naturalization in some areas of the USA, such as coastal southern states (including Georgia) and California (USDA NRCS 2015). This plant thrives in riparian and wetland areas and can exclude native species and alter water flow (Hunter & Platenkamp 2003). The bright red flowers are 2 to 3 cm long (University of Florida IFAS 2015). The fruit (i.e., pods) are longitudinally 4-winged and oblong in shape. Pods are 6 to 8 cm long, and each pod contains 3 to 9 seeds, located in the center of the pod.

In southeastern USA farmscapes, numerous non-crop hosts of C. hilaris, including black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.; Rosales: Rosaceae), elderberry (Sambucus nigra subsp. canadensis [L.] R. Bolli; Dipsacales: Adoxaceae), and mimosa (Albizia julibrissin Durazz.; Fabales: Fabaceae), exist in field edges bordering cotton (Jones & Sullivan 1982; Cottrell & Tillman 2015). In Florida, Drake (1920) found a C. hilaris parasitized by Trichopoda pennipes (F.) (Hymenoptera: Tachinidae) on Crotalaria sp., a plant in the Fabaceae family. Because S. punicea is naturalized in Georgia, the goal of this paper was to determine if this leguminous shrub served as a host for C. hilaris.

In the summer of 2014, all S. punicea plants (n = 6) in the field border (plants approx. 3 to 15 m from the cotton field edge) surrounding a cotton field (31°31′21″N, 83°20′'8″W) near Ocilla, Georgia, USA, were sampled for C. hilaris. Each plant was visually examined for all developmental stages of C. hilaris. Sampling was done 2 to 3 times per week from 11 Jun through 15 Aug. Direct observations of feeding by adults and nymphs were recorded. Visibly parasitized (i.e., darkened) egg masses detected during sampling were collected and held in the laboratory for emergence of egg parasitoids. Unparasitized egg masses were checked 3 to 5 d later for parasitism or emergence of 1st instars.

To determine if C. hilaris adults disperse from S. punicea to other host plants, adults detected on this leguminous shrub during sampling were marked. A medium-line, opaque, oil-based paint marker was used to paint a mark on the insect's prothorax. This mark can remain on a N. viridula adult for at least 54 d in the field, and thus it is an effective method for marking stink bugs (Tillman 2006).

A graph of the C. hilaris population, grouped by egg masses, young nymphs (2nd and 3rd instars), old nymphs (4th and 5th instars), and adults was constructed for 3 time periods in 2014, from 11 through 27 Jun, from 30 Jun through 25 Jul, and from 28 Jul through 15 Aug. These 3 time periods were chosen because they tended to reveal the overall development of the population over the period of the study.

Fruit were present on S. punicea plants from 11 Jun through mid-Aug 2014. Eggs masses of C. hilaris were found only on fruit of S. punicea, and subsequently nymphs and adults fed only on fruit. Each of the 3 egg masses detected on plants were parasitized by Trissolcus edessae Fouts (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and 2 were parasitized by Ooencyrtus sp. (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) and Anastatus sp. males (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae). In general, around 50% of the C. hilaris (50.5% for young nymphs, 65.1% for old nymphs, and 62.5% for adults) detected on S. punicea plants were observed feeding on fruit.

Initially, egg masses and young nymphs occurred on S. punicea plants (Fig. 1). Some old nymphs also were present during this early sampling period, indicating that they were likely developing on this plant prior to initiation of sampling. These older nymphs did not disperse from another host plant onto S. punicea, because nymphs were not present on any other host plant at this location during this time period. In the 2nd sampling period, only old nymphs and adults were present on S. punicea plants suggesting that C. hilaris was developing on this plant. Near the end of this time period, a female dispersed from S. punicea to nearby fruiting elderberry; a female marked in S. punicea on 18 Jul 2014 was found on elderberry on 24 Jul 2104. By the last sampling period, some egg masses and young nymphs were present again on the plant indicating that adults that had developed on the plant laid some eggs on plants. After 15 Aug, fruit dried out, and C. hilaris was not observed on plants again.

The buildup of C. hilaris on S. punicea in the field border next to cotton in early summer potentially could have a negative impact on fruiting cotton by either dispersing to other nearby host plants or moving directly into cotton. For example, preliminary mark-recapture studies have shown that C. hilaris disperses from elderberry into cotton in late Jul to early Aug (Tillman, unpublished). Management of this invasive plant could reduce its potential to exclude native species and alter water flow, as well as eliminate a possible source of C. hilaris into cotton.

Thanks to Kristie Graham, Jacob Barrett, and Chance Myers (United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Protection & Management Laboratory, Tifton, Georgia, USA) for technical assistance.

Fig. 1.

Mean (± SE) number of Chinavia hilaris per Sesbania punicea plant over 3 time periods in 2014; time period 1 was from 11 through 27 Jun, time period 2 was from 30 Jun through 25 Jul, and time period 3 was from 28 Jul through 15 Aug. Young nymphs were 2nd and 3rd instars; old nymphs were 4th and 5th instars.

f01_989.jpg

References Cited

1.

KS Barbour , Jr Bradley JR , JS. Bachelor 1990. Reduction in yield and quality of cotton damaged by green stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 842–845. Google Scholar

2.

CS Bundy , RM. McPherson 2000. Dynamics and seasonal abundance of stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in a cotton-soybean ecosystem. Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 697–706. Google Scholar

3.

CS Bundy , RM McPherson , GA. Herzog 2000. An examination of the external and internal signs of cotton boll damage by stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Journal of Entomological Science 35: 402–410. Google Scholar

4.

TE Cottrell , PG. Tillman 2015. Spatiotemporal distribution of Chinavia hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in corn farmscapes. Journal of Insect Science 15, doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iev017. Google Scholar

5.

CJ. Drake 1920. The southern green stink-bug in Florida. Florida State Plant Board Quarterly Bulletin 4: 41–94. Google Scholar

6.

JH Hoffmann , VC. Moran 1998. The population dynamics of an introduced tree, Sesbania punicea, in South Africa, in response to long-term damage caused by different combinations of three species of biological control agents. Oecologia 114: 343–348. Google Scholar

7.

JC Hunter , GAC. Platenkamp 2003. The hunt for red sesbania: biology, spread, and prospects for control In California Exotic Pest Plant Council (Cal-EPPC) News, Protecting California's Natural Areas from Wildland Weeds 11: 4–6. Google Scholar

8.

WA Jones , MJ. Sullivan 1982. Role of host plants in population dynamics of stink bug pests of soybean in South Carolina. Environmental Entomology 11: 867– 875. Google Scholar

9.

PG. Tillman 2006. Sorghum as a trap crop for Nezara viridula (L.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in cotton. Environmental Entomology 35: 771–783. Google Scholar

10.

University of Florida IFAS (Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences). 2015. Sesbania punicea.  http://plants.ifas.ufl.edu/node/418 (last accessed 2 Jan 2015). Google Scholar

11.

USDA NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2015. Plants profile for Sesbania punicea (rattlebox).  http://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=SEPU7 (last accessed 2 Jan 2015). Google Scholar
P. Glynn Tillman "First record of Sesbania punicea (Fabales: Fabaceae) as a Host Plant for Chinavia hilaris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)," Florida Entomologist 98(3), 989-990, (1 September 2015). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0333
Published: 1 September 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
2 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
alimentación
chinche verde
egg parasitoid
feeding
green stink bug
parasitoide de huevos
rattlebox
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top