Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2016 Brazilian Collections and Laboratory Biology of the Thrips Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae): A Potential Biological Control Agent of the Invasive Weed Brazilian Peppertree (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae), is one of the most invasive weeds in Florida and Hawaii. In the invaded range, this fast-growing weed from South America poses a threat to agriculture and cattle production and decreases the biodiveristy of natural areas. The thrips Pseudophilothrips ichini (Hood) (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) is being studied as a potential agent for the biological control of this weed. The laboratory life history and native range of P. ichini in Brazil were examined over 10 yr. The thrips life history includes 2 feeding larval stages that occur on the plant and 3 non-feeding pupal stages that occur in the soil. Development time, body length, and distinct features of each life stage are described. The larva-to-adult development required 20 d, and adults lived for an average of 50 d. Pseudophilothrips ichini had a wide latitudinal range in Brazil along the eastern coast from Bahia (11.4°S) south to Santa Catarina State (27.1°S). It was collected from sea level to 1,329 m elevation. Observations in Brazil indicated that this thrips occurs year round and may occasionally reach high densities (>20 thrips/leaf). Despite searches in its native range of related plants, the thrips was found only on Brazilian peppertree. Considering the short generation time, broad environmental tolerance, host specificity, and damage caused to the host if this thrips is released for biological control, it will contribute significantly to the management of Brazilian peppertree.

Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae), native to South America, is one of the most aggressive and widespread invasive species in Florida and Hawaii impacting agriculture, cattle production, and natural areas (Ewel 1986; Rodgers et al. 2014). Brazilian peppertree is an opportunistic invader forming dense stands in disturbed and natural ecosystems of hardwood hammocks, pine flatwoods, pine rocklands, sawgrass marshes, and coastal mangrove forests (Ewel et al. 1982; Gordon & Thomas 1997; Spector & Putz 2006; Donnelly et al. 2008). Many of these habitats (e.g., coastal mangrove forests) are critically important ecosystems in Florida because of their high productivity, their value as habitat to vertebrate and invertebrate species, and their function in shoreline protection and stabilization. These vital ecosystems are constantly being threatened by urbanization and invasive species such as Brazilian peppertree (Armentano et al. 1995; Doren & Jones 1997). Brazilian peppertree infests more natural areas in Florida than any other invasive species (Gann et al. 2008). In Hawaii, Brazilian peppertree is widespread in mesic to dry areas (Motooka et al. 2003). There are few management options available against Brazilian peppertree in these natural habitats. Previous attempts to control Brazilian peppertree have included fire, mowing, disking, rolling, chopping, and bulldozing (Doren & Whiteaker 1990; LaRosa et al. 1992). None of these techniques proved effective at slowing the spread of this invasive species (T. Pernas, Everglades National Park, Florida, personal communication). Currently, the main approach for controlling Brazilian peppertree in the U.S. is herbicidal (glyphosate or triclopyr), which is only a temporary measure (Bossard et al. 2000).

Biological control research for Brazilian peppertree began in Hawaii in 1954, continued between 1960 and 1961 (Yoshioka & Markin 1991), and has been conducted in Florida more recently (Hight et al. 2002; Wheeler et al. 2016). Three biological control agents were released in Hawaii, the seed feeder Lithraeus atronotatus (Pic) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae), the leaf folder Episimus unguiculus Clarke (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and the stem borer Crasimorpha infuscata Hodges (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) (Davis & Krauss 1962; Krauss 1962, 1963; Yoshioka & Markin 1991). Despite the establishment of the first 2 species in Hawaii, their feeding has not sufficiently reduced the weed problem prompting the need for additional species (Yoshioka & Markin 1991; Julien & Griffiths 1998; Hight et al. 2002). No biological control releases have occurred on the U.S. mainland (Wheeler et al. 2016).

The thrips Pseudophilothrips ichini (Hood) (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) is being proposed as a biological control agent of the invasive weed Brazilian peppertree for Florida and Hawaii (Wheeler et al. 2016). This thrips species was first recorded on leaves of S. terebinthifolia near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and assigned to the genus Liothrips (Hood 1949). Several members of this genus have since been assigned to Pseudophilothrips (Johansen 1979). Previously published literature incorrectly applied the name P. ichini to a different species, Pseudophilothrips gandolfoi Mound, Wheeler, & Williams (Garcia 1977; Hight et al. 2002; Cuda et al. 2008, 2009). The identity of these 2 species was recently clarified through molecular and morphological techniques (Mound et al. 2010), and the name P. ichini is applied herein. Little is known about the biology or distribution of P. ichini in its native range. The goal of this study was to describe the life history of this thrips species and its native geographic range in Brazil in order to assess its suitability as a biological control agent of S. terebinthifolia in the U.S. mainland. Additional details about these field collections are provided here. Documentation about the quarantine host range of this thrips species and its value for biological control of Brazilian peppertree will be covered elsewhere.

Materials and Methods

FIELD COLLECTIONS

Field surveys in Brazil for potential biological control agents of Brazilian peppertree began in 2005 and continued through 2015. Brazilian peppertree was also intensively surveyed in the northeastern provinces of Argentina, and details regarding the results there were provided by Mc Kay et al. (2009). In Brazil, 20 surveys were conducted during this period documenting the distribution of the thrips as part of a broader project to describe the native range of Brazilian peppertree and associated herbivores. Surveys established over 900 sites (Fig. 1) typically lasted 15 d and included 2 to 3 collectors. Searches for and collections of thrips were conducted by visual inspection and by shaking tree branches and capturing fallen individuals below with a beating sheet. A subsample of individuals was quickly transferred to 95% ethanol for later morphological examination. Thrips field collections were most commonly characterized as either present or absent, and, occasionally, large populations were noted.

To examine the ecological host range of the thrips in their native range, adjacent plants, especially members of the Anacardiaceae, were also searched at each site. Members of the Anacardiaceae sympatric with Brazilian peppertree included several South American endemic Schinus and Lithraea species, Anacardium occidentale L. (cashew), and the introduced Mangifera indica L. (mango). The Schinus species that overlap with Brazilian peppertree include S. molle L., S. lentiscifolia Marchand, S. longifolia (Lindl.) Speg., S. polygama (Cav.) Cabrera, and S. weinmannifolia Engl. (Muñoz 2000; JBRJ 2015). Other species of sympatric Anacardiaceae include Lithraea molleoides (Vell.) Engl, and L. brasiliensis Marchand. Other species, such as Anacardium humile St.-Hil., Astronium glaziovii Mattick, Astronium gracile Engl., Astronium graveolens Jacq., Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemo, Schinopsis brasiliensis Engl., and Tapirira guianenses Aubl., occur in the native range of Brazilian peppertree in Brazil (JBRJ 2015) but were never found sympatric with the host.

THRIPS REARING CONDITIONS

Colony thrips were routinely reared on live Brazilian peppertree plants inside vented acrylic cylindrical cages (45 cm length × 15 cm diameter). The vent at the top of the cylinder was sealed with expanding foam to prevent thrips escape (Jones et al. 2010). Experimental thrips were reared in Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) under ambient conditions of temperature (27 ± 2 °C) and photoperiod (12:12 h L:D). To observe the thrips life stages, each Petri dish was lined with black filter paper (Rundfilter 551; Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). The filter paper was moistened and the thrips were recorded daily to determine numbers and duration of each life stage. The thrips were fed a freshly collected leaf tip of Brazilian peppertree. Leaves were replaced as needed, generally every 2 to 3 d. As with other thrips (Lewis 1973), members of this species have 2 larval and 3 pupal stages, the latter defined as the pre-pupal, 1st pupal, and 2nd pupal stages.

THRIPS SLIDE MOUNTS

For detailed observations and measurements of thrips life stages, laboratory specimens were mounted on microscope slides and viewed at 7 to 100× magnification under a Leica MZ-16 stereomicroscope (ThripsWiki 2014). Briefly, specimens were soaked in a NaOH (2%) solution for 12 to 15 h at room temperature. Specimens were then transferred to clean water, where they were soaked for 1 h, and then to ethanol (60%) for 12 to 24 h. The thrips were dehydrated in a series of increased ethanol concentrations, 70% (1 h), 80% (20 min), 95% (10 min), 100% (5 min) and then transferred to clove oil for 30 min. To make microscope mounts, specimens were transferred to a drop of Canada balsam placed on a cover slip with the thrips' ventral side up. A microscope slide was firmly lowered onto each specimen in the Canada balsam on the cover slip. The slide was inverted and placed onto a hotplate (45 °C) for 3 wk.

Results

BRAZILIAN PEPPERTREE AND THRIPS GEOGRAPHIC RANGE

The geographic range of the host Brazilian peppertree and the thrips P. ichini were determined by frequent surveys in Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina. The host plant naturally occurred along the eastern coast of Brazil from Natal in Rio Grande do Norte State, south to Entre Rios Province in northeastern Argentina and adjacent Paraguay (Fig. 1). In Bahia State, Brazilian peppertree extended west to near Feira de Santana, and in Minas Gerais State, populations extended west to Belo Horizonte then south to western Rio Grande do Sul, northeastern Argentina, and eastern Paraguay (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Map showing the distribution of the host Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolia, in its native range (black dots) and the thrips Pseudophilothrips ichini (red dots). Thrips introduced to quarantine for life history studies were collected from a population near Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

f01_06.jpg

Despite systematic searches, the thrips distribution did not entirely overlap that of the host. The thrips species was found in the Brazilian states Sergipe, Bahia, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Minas Gerais (Fig. 1). Sites ranged from sea level to 1,329 m elevation and from 11.42864 to 27.04962 south latitude. However, P. ichini was never found north of Sergipe or south of Santa Catarina states of Brazil. Furthermore, it was never found west of Paraná, Santa Catarina, or Rio Grande do Sul states of Brazil or in adjacent Argentina or Paraguay. The thrips population introduced under quarantine for subsequent life history studies was field collected from Brazilian peppertree leaves in Nov 2007. This collection occurred at a site (20.36911°S, 43.56029°W; 1,329 m elevation) near Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Fig. 1).

Thrips seasonal observations from Brazilian field surveys indicated that P. ichini was present year round, and its presence was influenced more by the availability of host flushing tips than by seasons. Thrips were present during every Brazilian survey conducted between 2005 and 2015, and these surveys occurred during every month of the year, except May. Thrips were not found at every site during every visit, but within the thrips' distribution, populations were found at 40% of the sites surveyed. Although generally only the presence or absence of thrips was recorded, high densities of thrips (>20 thrips/leaf) were occasionally observed during the austral spring, summer, and fall.

THRIPS LIFE HISTORY

The life history stages of P. ichini include egg, 2 larval stages, 3 pupal stages, and the adult (Fig. 2). The pupal stages include the prepupal, 1st pupal, and 2nd pupal stages. Only the larval and adult stages feed on the tips and leaves of Brazilian peppertree. The pupal stages are non-feeding resting stages that normally occur in the soil, whereas all other stages occur on the plant. A freshly laid egg measured 0.4 mm in length and required on average (± SE) 4.75 (± 0.2) d until larval hatch (n = 24 eggs from 10 females). The body length of the 1st and 2nd larval stages measured 0.7 and 1.0 mm, respectively, and their development required 5.0 (± 0.2) and 7.6 (± 0.4) d, respectively. The prepupal stage measured 1.6 mm in body length and required 1.3 (± 0.1) d for development. The 1st and 2nd pupal stages measured 1.9 and 2.1 mm, respectively, in body length and required 1.6 (± 0.1) and 3.6 (± 0.1) d, respectively, for development. Total development time from larval hatch to adult emergence was 20.0 (± 1.4) d. To avoid damaging the live adults, their gender was not determined. Adults measured 2.5 mm in body length and, when fed leaves, lived 50.0 (± 3.8) d. The larval stages were distinguished by the 2nd larval stage having a line (lacking in the 1st) on the last segment extending almost completely around the abdomen. Each pupal stage was distinguished in the following ways. The pre-pupa lacked wing buds and had greatly reduced antennae; the 1st pupal stage had wing buds, the antennae barely reached the abdomen, and the head was square shaped; and the 2nd pupal stage had longer wings extending to the abdomen, the antennae reached beyond the thorax, and the head was trapezoidal, wider at the distal end than the base.

Fig. 2.

Life history stages of the thrips Pseudophilothrips ichini reared on leaves of Schinus terebinthifolia in quarantine at the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory (horizontal bars = 0.5 mm).

f02_06.jpg

THRIPS HOST RANGE IN SOUTH AMERICA

The only known published report of the host range of this thrips was from the original collection on leaves of Brazilian peppertree near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Hood 1949; Silva et al. 1968). Similarly, the results of our field host range assessment indicated a high degree of specificity; this thrips was found only on Brazilian peppertree. However, in the thrips' native range, few other natural populations of Anacardiaceae species co-occur. For example, the congener, S. molle was never found naturally at the same site with the thrips. However, ornamental plants of this non-target species were found and searched at 4 locations within the thrips range. These included 4 sites, 1 each in Paraná, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo states. The plants were visually inspected and shaken to collect insects as described in the methods, but thrips were never found on S. molle. Similar searches resulted in finding thrips on Lithraea species, but these were a different species of thrips as revealed by both morphology and DNA analysis (Wheeler et al., unpublished data).

THRIPS NATURAL ENEMIES IN SOUTH AMERICA

Although many insect predators, including ants and spiders, were seen abundantly on the host in Brazil, we never witnessed predation of any thrips life stage during these surveys. Collection of thrips larvae and rearing in quarantine indicated that very few parasitoids attack this stage. Collections of thrips larvae in Nov 2007 indicated that less than 5% of field-collected individuals (approximate n = 100 larvae) were attacked by the parasitoid Thripastichus sp. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Additional collections made in Jun 2015 indicated that no thrips larvae (approximate n = 100 larvae) were parasitized. These parasitoids were excluded during quarantine colonization and have not been seen since this initial collection from Brazil.

Discussion

The species P. ichini was chosen as a potential biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree because 1) it appears to have a high level of specificity for the target weed (Wheeler et al., unpublished data); 2) it has wide environmental tolerance indicated by a broad climatic range as reported here and by Manrique et al. (2014); and 3) field observations and greenhouse studies indicate thrips feeding damage dramatically reduces survival, growth, and reproduction of the host (Manrique et al. 2014; Wheeler et al., unpublished data). Despite this apparent broad climatic tolerance, the thrips was not found in South America throughout the entire range occupied by the host Brazilian peppertree. Possibly the thrips' native range is limited by climate or host haplotype, and the tests of these hypotheses have yet to be published.

Thermal requirements and plant genotypes can be important factors in the establishment of newly introduced biological control agents (Ireson et al. 2008). Temperature-based physiological models indicated that P. ichini will establish throughout the invaded range in the U.S. (Manrique et al. 2014). Moreover, P. ichini is well adapted to the 2 Brazilian peppertree haplotypes and their hybrid that are invasive in Florida and Hawaii (Manrique et al. 2008).

Despite the thrips occasionally reaching high densities (>20 adults/ leaf), they may be protected from predators by defensive allomones as is known from other thrips species (Blum et al. 1992; Suzuki et al. 2004). These defenses are characteristically produced in thrips when disturbed and can be recognized by the raised abdomen tip that secretes a droplet of repellent liquid (Lewis 1973). This same tip raising behavior was seen when we disturbed individuals of P. ichini. The only observed natural enemy of these thrips, namely, Thripastichus sp., was discovered during the initial field collection of larvae of P. ichini. The vulnerability of these thrips to natural enemies in the U.S. has yet to be determined.

Field observations indicated that this thrips was typically found feeding on the Brazilian peppertree's expanded flush leaves produced periodically at branch tips. Adults colonized first by feeding on the flush leaves, followed by egg deposition on the leaves, and 2 larval stages. Typically these attacked stems and tips produced leaves that are distorted and wrinkled eventually leading to death of the plant tip. Branches that had these dead tips were never seen flowering and thus did not produce fruit. If released in the Brazilian peppertree's invaded range, the thrips should have abundant food supply. Surveys conducted in south Florida indicated Brazilian peppertrees flush new leaves year round except late Oct and early Nov (Ewel et al. 1982). With abundant food supply and the short generation time (20 d), we expect the thrips biological control agent will contribute significantly to the control of this invasive weed.

Acknowledgments

We thank Megan Chawner and Jessica Rendon (SCA/AmeriCorps, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida) for technical assistance and M. Vitorino (Univ. Blumenau, Brazil) for field assistance. Insect identifications were generously provided for P. ichini by L. A. Mound and for Thripastichus sp. by J. La Salle (CSIRO, Canberra, Australia). Thrips voucher specimens are deposited in the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Thrips identity was confirmed by DNA barcode analysis conducted by D. Williams, TCU (GenBank accessions GU942810– GU942817). Insect collections and exportations were authorized by Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente (Permits N° 09BR003939/DF, 14BR004731/DF). The importation permit to the USA was issued by the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to G. Wheeler (Permit N° P526P-07-06609). This project was partially funded by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (#08250, TA:088), the South Florida Water Management District (#4600001427), and the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.

References Cited

  1. Armentano TV , Doren RF , Platt WJ , Mullins T. 1995. Effect of hurricane Andrew on coastal and interior forests of southern Florida: overview and synthesis. Journal of Coastal Research 21: 111–144. Google Scholar

  2. Blum MS , Footit R , Fales HM. 1992. Defensive chemistry and function of the anal exudate of the thrips Haplothrips leucanthemi. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C 102: 209–211. Google Scholar

  3. Bossard CC , Randall JM , Hoshovsky MC. 2000. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. Google Scholar

  4. Cuda JP , Gillmore JL , Medal JC , Pedrosa-Macedo JH. 2008. Mass rearing of Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae), an approved biological control agent for Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolius (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae). Florida Entomologist 91: 338–340. Google Scholar

  5. Cuda JP , Medal JC , Gillmore JL , Habeck DH , Pedrosa-Macedo JH. 2009. Fundamental host range of Pseudophilothnps ichini s.l. (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae): a candidate biological control agent of Schinus terebinthifolius (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae) in the United States. Environmental Entomology 38: 1642–1652. Google Scholar

  6. Davis CJ , Krauss NL. 1962. Recent introductions for biological control in Hawaii— VII. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 18: 125–129. Google Scholar

  7. Donnelly MJ , Green DM , Walters LJ. 2008. Allelopathic effects of fruits of the Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius on growth, leaf production and biomass of seedlings of the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle and the black mangrove Avicennia germinans. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 357: 149–156. Google Scholar

  8. Doren RF , Jones DT. 1997. Plant management in Everglades National Park, pp. 275–286 In Simberloff D , Schmitz DC , Brown TC [eds.], Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia. Google Scholar

  9. Doren RF , Whiteaker LD. 1990. Effects of fire on different size individuals of Schinus terebinthifolius. Natural Areas Journal 10: 106–113. Google Scholar

  10. Ewel J. 1986. Invasibility: lessons from south Florida, pp. 214–230 In Mooney HA , Drake JA [eds.], Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York. Google Scholar

  11. Ewel J , Ojima DS , Karl DA , DeBusk WF . 1982. Schinus in successional ecosystems of Everglades National Park. T-676: 1–141. National Park Service, South Florida Research Center, Everglades National Park, Homestead, Florida. Google Scholar

  12. Gann GD , Bradley K , Woodmansee SW. 2008. Institute for Regional Conservation,  www.regionalconservation.org (last accessed 15 Jun 2015). Google Scholar

  13. Garcia CA. 1977. Biology and aspects of the ecology and compared defensive behavior of Liothrips ichini Hood 1949 (Thysanoptera Tubulifera). Master's thesis. Federal University of Paraná, Brazil. Google Scholar

  14. Gordon DR , Thomas KP. 1997. Florida's invasion by nonindigenous plants: history, screening, and regulation, pp. 21–37 In Simberloff D , Schmitz DC , Brown TC [eds.], Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia. Google Scholar

  15. Hight SD , Cuda JP , Medal JC. 2002. Brazilian peppertree, pp. 311–321 In Van Driesche RG , Lyon S , Blossey B , Hoddle MS , Reardon R [eds.], Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States. USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia. Google Scholar

  16. Hood JD. 1949. Brasilian Thysanoptera. I. Revista de Entomologia, Rio de Janeiro 20: 3–88. Google Scholar

  17. Ireson JE , Holloway RJ , Chatterton WS. 2008. The influence of host plant genotype on variation in population densities of the gorse thrips, Sericothrips staphylinus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and its consideration in relation to release strategies. Biocontrol Science and Technology 18: 949–955. Google Scholar

  18. JBRJ. 2015. JBRJ —Institute for Botanical Garden Research of Rio de Janeiro. Jabot—Database of the Brazilian Flora,  http://www.jbrj.gov.br/jabot (last accessed 15 Jun 2015). Google Scholar

  19. Johansen RM. 1979. Nuevos trips tubuliferos (Insecta: Thysanoptera) de México V. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional de México 48: 77–92. Google Scholar

  20. Jones AK , McLeod P , Steinkraus D. 2010. Use of expanding foam for confining thrips in cages on cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp, flowers. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 83: 97–99. Google Scholar

  21. Julien MH , Griffiths MW. 1998. Biological Control of Weeds, a World Catalogue of Agents and their Target Weeds, 4th ed. CAB International, Oxon, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

  22. Krauss NL. 1962. Biological control investigations on insect, snail and weed pests in tropical America, 1961. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 18: 131–133. Google Scholar

  23. Krauss NL. 1963. Biological control investigations on Christmas berry (Schinus terebinthifolius) and emex (Emex spp.). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 18: 281–287. Google Scholar

  24. LaRosa LM , Doren RF , Gunderson LH. 1992. Alien plant management in Everglades National Park: an historical perspective, pp. 47–63 In Stone CP , Smith CW , Tunison JT [eds.], Alien Plant Invasions in Native Ecosystems of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, Hawaii. Google Scholar

  25. Lewis T. 1973. Thrips. Their Biology, Ecology and Economic Importance. Academic Press Inc., New York, New York. Google Scholar

  26. Manrique V , Cuda JP , Overholt WA , Williams DA , Wheeler GS. 2008. Effect of host-plant genotypes on the performance of three candidate biological control agents of Schinus terebinthifolius in Florida. Biological Control 47: 167–171. Google Scholar

  27. Manrique V , Diaz R , Erazo L , Reddi N , Wheeler GS , Williams D , Overholt WA. 2014. Comparison of two populations of Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) as candidates for biological control of the invasive weed Schinus terebinthifolia (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 24: 518–535. Google Scholar

  28. Mc Kay F , Oleiro M , Cabrera Walsh G , Gandolfo D , Cuda JP , Wheeler GS. 2009. Natural enemies of Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius: Anacardiaceae) from Argentina: their possible use for biological control in the USA. Florida Entomologist 92: 292–303. Google Scholar

  29. Motooka P , Castro L , Nelson D , Nagai G , Ching L. 2003. Weeds of Hawaii's Pastures and Natural Areas: An Identification and Managment Guide. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (University of Hawaii-Manoa), Honolulu, Hawaii. Google Scholar

  30. Mound LA , Wheeler GS , Williams DA. 2010. Resolving cryptic species with morphology and DNA; thrips as a potential biocontrol agent of Brazilian peppertree, with a new species and overview of Pseudophilothrips (Thysanoptera). Zootaxa 2432: 59–68. Google Scholar

  31. Muñoz JD. 2000. Anacardiaceae, pp. 1–28 In Hunziker AT [ed.], Flora Fanerogámica Argentina 54, Conicet Córdoba, Argentina. Google Scholar

  32. Rodgers L , Pernas T , Hill SD. 2014. Mapping invasive plant distributions in the Florida Everglades using the digital aerial sketch mapping technique. Invasive Plant Science and Management 7: 360–374. Google Scholar

  33. Silva AGA , Gonçalves CR , Galvão DM , Gonçalves AJL , Gomes J , Silva MN , de Simoni L. 1968. Quarto Catálogo dos Insetos que Vivem nas Plantas do Brasil, seus Parasitos e Predadores. Ministry of Agriculture, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Google Scholar

  34. Spector T , Putz F. 2006. Biomechanical plasticity facilitates invasion of maritime forests in the southern USA by Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Biological Invasions 8: 255–260. Google Scholar

  35. Suzuki T , Haga K , Tsutsumi T , Matsuyama S. 2004. Analysis of anal secretions from phlaeothripine thrips. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 409–423. Google Scholar

  36. ThripsWiki. 2014.  http://thrips.info/wiki/main_page (last accessed 15 Jun 2015). Google Scholar

  37. Wheeler GS , Mc Kay F , Vitorino MD , Manrique V , Diaz R , Overholt WA. 2016. Biological control of the invasive weed, Brazilian peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolia. A review of the project with an update on the proposed agents. Southeastern Naturalist (in press). Google Scholar

  38. Yoshioka ER , Markin GP. 1991. Efforts of biological control of Christmas berry Schinus terebinthifolius in Hawaii, pp. 377–385 In Center TD , Doren RF , Hofstetter RL , Myers RL , Whiteaker LD [eds.], Proceedings of the Symposium on Exotic Pest Plants, Miami, Florida. Google Scholar

G. S. Wheeler, N. Silverson, K. Dyer, and F. Mc Kay "Brazilian Collections and Laboratory Biology of the Thrips Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae): A Potential Biological Control Agent of the Invasive Weed Brazilian Peppertree (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae)," Florida Entomologist 99(1), (1 March 2016). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0103
Published: 1 March 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top