Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2016 Three New Host Plants of Edessa loxdalii (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) and Notes on Its Rearing in the Laboratory
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The poorly known stink bug, Edessa loxdalii Westwood (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) was intercepted in Francisco Beltrão, Paraná State, Brazil (26.0808333°S, 53.0547222°W) feeding and reproducing on soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill (Fabales: Fabaceae), on oriental raisin tree, Hovenia dulcis Thunb. (Rosales: Rhamnaceae), and on the wild solanaceous plant Solanum corymbiflorum (Sendtn.) Bohs. (Solanales: Solanaceae). Preliminary data obtained in the laboratory on a mixture of natural foods indicated a delayed development time and high nymphal mortality.

The subfamily Edessinae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), which is supported by several characteristics (Barcellos & Grazia 2003; Fernandes 2010), contains various groups of species (Fernandes & van Doesburg 2000; Fernandes & Campos 2011; Silva & Fernandes 2012). Among these groups, the highly speciose genus Edessa comprises an enormous number of described (291) ( www.insectoid.info/taxo.php) and undescribed (>300) species (J.A.M. Fernandes, personal communication to A.R.P.). Among them, there are well studied species, such as the so-called (in Brazil) brown-winged stink bug Edessa meditabunda (F.), mostly reported as a pest of soybean, sunflower, and potato (Rizzo 1971; Galileo & Heinrichs 1979; Panizzi & Machado-Neto 1992), but also feeding on vegetables (Krinski et al. 2012). However, most of the species of Edessa are poorly studied, and their host plants are unknown.

During Sep—Dec 2014, and on 22 Mar 2015, on 4 occasions, nymphs and adults of a species of Edessa were observed and collected on 3 plant species in Francisco Beltrão, Paraná State, Brazil (26.0808333°S, 53.0547222°W). Insects captured in 2014 were taken to the laboratory at the Embrapa Unit at Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil (28.2500000°S, 52.4000000°W). They were placed in clear plastic rearing boxes (25 ×20 × 20 cm) lined with filter paper and provided with pods of green bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabales: Fabaceae), raw shelled peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. (Fabales: Fabaceae), mature seeds of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill (Fabales: Fabaceae), and fruits (berries) of privet, Ligustrum lucidum Aiton (Lamiales: Oleaceae). This mixture of foods is routinely used to keep colonies of stink bugs in our laboratory. Boxes were kept in a walk-in chamber at 25 ± 1°C temperature, 65 ± 5% RH, and a photoperiod of 14:10h L:D.

The insects were sent for examination and were identified as Edessa loxdalii Westwood. Nymphs and adults (Fig. 1) were captured colonizing plants of soybean, oriental raisin tree, Hovenia dulcis Thunb. (Rosales: Rhamnaceae), and plants of a wild solanaceous shrub Solanum corymbiflorum (Sendtn.) Bohs. (Solanales: Solanaceae), these last plants located in the border of an area covered with natural vegetation. On all 3 species of host plants, nymphs and adults were observed to feed on stems and leaves. Species of Edessa are known to feed on stems or on leaf veins of their host plants. This behavior is documented for E. meditabunda on soybean (Galileo & Heinrichs 1979; Panizzi & Machado-Neto 1992; Silva et al. 2012). From the colony established in the laboratory, nymphs and adults were observed to feed mostly on the green bean pods and on the stems of privet branches holding the berries that were used in the rearing boxes. It was interesting that on privet, whereas most pentatomids that we normally rear in the laboratory feed on the berries, E. loxdalii preferred the stems.

Data on reproduction, nymph development time, and survivorship to the 2nd instar of the insects collected in 2014 on soybean and on the wild solanaceous plant are presented in Table 1. Adults were fed in the laboratory on the mixture of foods previously described. Females laid eggs, and nymphs obtained survived to the adult stage, taking approximately 60 d to complete development; however, mortality was high, and over 30% of the nymphs were dead before reaching the 3rd instar. Because we did not keep records on individual nymphs, we are unable to provide data on survivorship and development time for each instar and from 2nd instar to adult.

Nymph mortality is usually high for species of Edessa reared in the laboratory. For example, nymphs of E. meditabunda reared in the laboratory on soybean and sunflower leaf/stem showed mortality >80% (Panizzi & Machado-Neto 1992); mortality on green bean pod was 81% (Sánchez et al. 1999); for Edessa aff. aulacosterna Stål feeding on branches and buds of the Amazonian camu camu, Myrciaria dubia (Kunth) McVaugh (Myrtales: Myrtaceae), mortality was 98% (lannacone et al. 2007). The relatively long development time of nymphs might be attributed to the fact that they fed on stems, most likely on xylem vessels, which are low in nutrients. Another species, E. meditabunda is also known to feed on xylem (Lucini & Panizzi 2016), and its development time is usually longer (48–73 d [Rizzo 1971]; 50–96 d [Gonçalves et al. 2008]) compared with that of other phytophagous stink bugs that feed on seeds (<40 d) (see references in Panizzi 1997). For E. aff. aulacosterna feeding on branches and buds of the Amazonian camu camu, nymph development (egg to adult) required 119 d (lannacone et al. 2007).

Little information was found in the literature regarding E. loxdalii. The species is reported to occur in Guyana (as British Guiana) (Kirkaldy 1909), Suriname (Kastelein 1985), and Costa Rica ( http://boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=478529). It is reported to transmit Phytomonas sp. (Trypanosomatida: Trypanosomatidae) to the palm tree known as embauba, Cecropia palmata Willd. (Rosales: Urticaceae), native to Central and South America and the West Indies, and possibly to coconut, Cocos nucifera L. (Arecales: Arecaceae) in Suriname (Kastelein 1985). These 2 palm species are the only records on associated plants that we found in the literature for E. loxdalii. However, despite its transmission of trypanosomatid parasites to the plants, it is not clear if the insect is able to reproduce on them or not.

Fig. 1.

Edessa loxdalii nymph on soybean stem (a) and copulating adults on leaf of oriental raisin tree (b).

f01_139.jpg

In Brazil, the only record we found in the literature is by Grazia & Schwertner (2011), who mentioned that E. loxdalii occurs in São Paulo State, but they gave no host plants. Apparently, because of its limited economic importance, this species has not been investigated much, and its host plants are unknown, despite its possible general distribution in the country.

In conclusion, E. loxdalii apparently feeds and reproduces on the 3 host plants on which they were intercepted, because nymphs and adults were found on the plants. The wild S. corymbiflorum is not common, but as Edessa species are known to prefer solanaceous plants, it might be one of E. loxdalii's preferred host plants. Soybean covers huge areas nearby the site where the insects were observed, and therefore this plant is located easily by them; Edessa species also are known to prefer plants of the family Fabaceae. The oriental raisin tree might have attracted E. loxdalii to feed on the abundant buds, where most nymphs were found. In the laboratory, nymphs completed development and adults reproduced on the food mixture provided (described above), which is routinely used to rear several species of stink bugs. Thus, E. loxdalii likely is polyphagous and therefore has flexibility to adapt to alternate food sources.

Table 1.

Host plants of Edessa loxdalii field-collected in Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil, in 2014 and 2015, and biology data obtained in the laboratory.

t01_139.gif

We thank José A. M. Fernandes for the identification of the insect species, and 2 anonymous reviewers for critically reading this note. We also thank CAPES (Ministry of Education, Federal Government of Brazil) for a scholarship to T.L., and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil) for financial support to A.R.P. through the research project MCT/CNPq 14/2012, process NS 471517/2012-7.

References Cited

  1. Barcellos A , Grazia J. 2003. Cladistics analysis and biogeography of Brachystethus Laporte (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae, Edessinae). Zootaxa 256: 1–14. Google Scholar

  2. Fernandes JAM. 2010. A new genus and species of Edessinae from Amazon Region (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Zootaxa 2662: 53–65. Google Scholar

  3. Fernandes JAM , Campos LD. 2011. A new group of species of Edessa Fabricius, 1803 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Zootaxa 3019: 63–68. Google Scholar

  4. Fernandes JAM , van Doesburg PH. 2000. The E. cervus-group of Edessa Fabricius, 1903 (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Edessinae). Zoolögische Mededeelingen 74: 151–165. Google Scholar

  5. Galileo MHM , Heinrichs EA. 1979. Danos causados à soja em diferentes níveis e épocas de infestação durante o crescimento. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 14: 279–282. Google Scholar

  6. Gonçalves L , Almeida FS , Mota F de M. 2008. Efeitos da temperatura no desenvolvimento e reprodução de Edessa meditabunda (Fabricius, 1794) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Acta Entomológica Paranaensis 37: 111–121. Google Scholar

  7. Grazia, J , Schweriner CF . 2011. Checklist of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea) from São Paulo state, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 11(1a):  http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v11n1a/en/abstract?inventory+bn0371101a2011 (last accessed 14 Dec 2015). Google Scholar

  8. Iannacone J , Perez D , Tueros A. 2007. Life cycle and population aspects of camu camu fruit stink bug Edessa aff. aulacosterna Stål, 1872 (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in Restinga Zone, Ucayali, Peru. Acta Amazonica 37: 635–642. Google Scholar

  9. Kastelein P. 1985. Transmission of Phytomonas sp. (Trypanosomatidae) by the bug Edessa loxdalii Westwood (Pentatomidae). De Surinaamse Landbouw 33: 62–64. Google Scholar

  10. Kirkaldy GW. 1909. Catalogue of the Hemiptera (Heteroptera) Volume I: Cimicidae. Felix L. Dames, Berlin, Germany. Google Scholar

  11. Krinski D , Favetti BM , Butnariu AR. 2012. First report of Edessa meditabunda (F.) on lettuce in Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 41: 79–80. Google Scholar

  12. Lucini T , Panizzi AR. 2016. Waveform characterization of the soybean stem feeder Edessa meditabunda (F.) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): overcoming the challenge of wiring pentatomids for EPG. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata (in press). https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12389 Google Scholar

  13. Panizzi AR. 1997. Wild hosts of pentatomids: ecological significance and role in their pest status on crops. Annual Review of Entomology 42: 99–122. Google Scholar

  14. Panizzi AR , Machado-Neto E. 1992. Development of nymphs and feeding habits of nymphal and adult Edessa meditabunda (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on soybean and sunflower. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 85: 477–481. Google Scholar

  15. Rizzo HF. 1971. Aspectos morfológicos y biológicos de Edessa meditabunda (F) (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Revista Peruana de Entomologia 14: 272–281. Google Scholar

  16. Sánchez MDC , Díaz D , Maselli ME. 1999. Comportamiento y tiempo de desarrollo de la chinche Edessa meditabunda (F.) (Hemiptera; Pentatomidae). Revista Facultad de Agronomía (Maracay) 25: 149–158. Google Scholar

  17. Silva VJ da , Fernandes JAM. 2012. A new species group in Edessa Fabricius, 1803 (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Edessinae). Zootaxa 3313: 12–22. Google Scholar

  18. Silva FAC , Silva JJ da , Depieri RA , Panizzi AR. 2012. Feeding activity, salivary amylase activity and superficial damage to soybean seed by adult Edessa meditabunda (F.) and Euschistus heros (F.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Neotropical Entomology 41: 386–390. Google Scholar

Tiago Lucini and Antônio R. Panizzi "Three New Host Plants of Edessa loxdalii (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) and Notes on Its Rearing in the Laboratory," Florida Entomologist 99(1), 139-141, (1 March 2016). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0131
Published: 1 March 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top