Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2016 Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillaceae) Strains Pathogenic to Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Forty strains of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Baciliales: Bacillaceae) that were isolated from corpses of Hemiptera were assessed against Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), an aphid that is considered one of the most destructive pests affecting the agricultural economy. Seventeen strains were significantly different from the control according to the LSD test (α = 0.05). They caused mortality rates ranging from 64.4 to 88.9% at 10 ng/μL total protein concentration, and from 71.1 to 91.1% at 100 ng/μL total protein concentration. The virulence (LC50) of these 17 strains was calculated, and 5 strains showed the highest virulence (GP777 = 10.63 ng/μL, HD1 = 9.10 ng/μL, GP528 = 7.86 ng/μL, GP402 = 7.12 ng/μL, and GP300 = 6.88 ng/μL). These strains have the potential to be used as an alternative to control M. persicae under field and covered conditions.

Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) belong to the phytophagous group, and several species constitute worldwide major pests because they are polyphagous and negatively impact several economically important crops. Therefore, these insects are considered the most destructive pests affecting the agricultural economy (Pascal et al. 2010). Myzus persicae (Sulcer) is one polyphagous species of major economic importance because this aphid can transmit more than 100 viruses, causing a number of diseases including yellow leaf curl, beet mosaic virus, cucurbit aphid-borne yellow virus, plum pox virus, and tobacco mosaic virus (Blackman & Eastop 1984; Manachini et al. 2007). Current management of this pest unfortunately relies exclusively on the application of chemical insecticides, which leads to the development of resistance (Chougule & Bonning 2012), subsequent increase in the number of requisite applications, and the use of active ingredients that cause harmful effects to non-target insects, humans, and the environment (Foster et al. 2000; Lacey et al. 2001). Therefore, alternative techniques for control should be implemented.

One of these techniques could be the use of the entomopathogenic bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Baciliales: Bacillaceae). This bacterium produces one or various crystalline inclusions that are composed of insecticidal crystal proteins (ICPs) or δ-endotoxins. These ICPs have highly specific activity against several orders of insects, increasing their attractiveness for their use as a biological control agent (Aronson 1993, 2000). The ICPs are toxic to the Lepidoptera, Diptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Homoptera, Orthoptera, and Mallophaga species, as well as other organisms, such as nematodes, mites, and protozoa (Van Frankenhuyzen 2009). The use of these proteins has shown great efficacy against lepidopteran, coleopteran and dipteran pests; however, ICPs have not been successful in controlling Hemiptera (Schnepf et al. 1998).

Several reports have demonstrated low levels of toxicity to aphids at high concentrations of toxins from B. thuringiensis. Porcar et al. (2009) found low to moderate toxicity of Cry3A, Cry4Aa, and Cry11Aa to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris. Walters & English (1995) used feeding bioassays that indicated some toxicity of the B. thuringiensis toxins Cry2, Cry3A, and Cry4 against the potato aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas. Huarong et al. (2011) obtained low toxicity with Cry1Ac and Cry3A against A. pisum. However, Sattar & Maiti (2011) obtained high toxicity with the toxin Vip2Ae (homologue protein of Vip2A). Analyses with transgenic plants expressing Cry toxins on aphids showed minor effects on aphid survival and fecundity, as well as significant beneficial effects on aphid populations (Burgio et al. 2007, 2011; Schuler et al. 2005).

In previous research, we showed that B. thuringiensis strains induced physical changes and mortality in M. persicae (Torres-Quintero et al. 2015). In this work, we characterized 40 B. thuringiensis strains isolated from corpses of Hemiptera, and we identified the strains that were pathogenic and highly virulent to M. persicae.

Materials and Methods

SOURCE OF M. PERSICAE FOR LABORATORY BIOASSAYS

Native populations of M. persicae were collected from lettuce crops in the state of Morelos, Mexico, and kept in a greenhouse. All stages of the insects were maintained on chili plants (Capsicum annuum var. aviculare; Solanaceae). The plants were put into cages (90 × 90 × 90 cm) covered with a mesh to exclude predators or parasitoids. The insects used in the bioassays were from the 4th generation.

ORIGIN OF B. THURINGIENSIS STRAINS ASSESSED

The B. thuringiensis strains were obtained from the collection at the Laboratory of Plant Parasitology of the Center of Biological Research of the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Mexico (CIB-UAEM). Forty strains from this collection were selected because they had been isolated from corpses of hemipteran insects (Table 1). The commercial strain HD1 (active against Lepidoptera) was used as a negative control, and the strain GP139 was used as a positive control because it is pathogenic to Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) (Salazar-Magallon et al. 2015).

PRODUCTION OF SPORE—CRYSTAL SUSPENSION

The B. thuringiensis strains were grown in solid nutrient HCT (Bacto Tryptone (Difco) 5; Casamino acids (Difco) 2; pH adjusted to 7.5). After sterilization, KH2PO4, 3.4 g/L; MgSO4.7H2O, 0.012 g/L; MnSO4.4H2O, 0.003 g/L; ZnSO4.7H2O, 0.0028 g/L; Fe(SO4)3.7H2O, 0.02 g/L; CaCl2.2H2O, 0.147 g/L; and glucose, 3 g/L were added, and strains were incubated at 30 °C for 72 h. After complete sporulation, the spores and crystals were collected in sterile water with 1 mM of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and the total protein concentration was determined by the protein dye method of Bradford (1976) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Table 1.

Host origins of the Bacillus thuringiensis strains evaluated in this study.

t01_639.gif

PATHOGENICITY BIOASSAYS

The in vitro feeding bioassays were performed with the spore—crystal complex produced by the B. thuringiensis strains using 4th instar nymphs of M. persicae. The bioassays for aphid feeding were prepared as described by Torres-Quintero et al. (2013). The basic liquid diet consisted of 5% yeast extract and 30% sucrose in distilled water at pH 7.0 (Jancovich et al. 1997). For each strain, 2 concentrations of total protein were used: 10 ng/μL and 100 ng/μL. A plain liquid diet was used as untreated control. A completely randomized design was used, and each experimental unit consisted of a feeding chamber with 20 aphids. All bioassays were carried out in triplicates. The mortality of aphids was determined at 72 h.

VIRULENCE BIOASSAYS (LC50 AND LC90) AND PROTEIN PROFILES OF THE STRAINS

Virulence was determined with 7 concentrations of total protein (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 ng/μL) and a control without protein. Each treatment was applied in the same way as in the pathogenicity bioassays. The mortality was determined at 72 h (Torres-Quintero et al. 2015). The protein profiles of all the strains evaluated in bioassays of virulence were analyzed by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

The percentage of mortality was analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparisons of means (least significant difference “LSD”); both analyses were carried out with the SAS system for Windows 9.0 (SAS Institute 2002). Probit analysis of mortality data was performed to estimate the lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC90) with the program PoloPlus (Robertson et al. 2003).

Results

PATHOGENICITY BIOASSAYS

Of the 40 B. thuringiensis strains evaluated for their pathogenicity to M. persicae, 17 strains were significantly different from the sporecrystal-free control according to the LSD test (α = 0.05), with mortality rates between 64.4 and 88.9% at 10 ng/μL and between 71.1 and 91.1% at 100 ng/μL, with the exception of strains GP865 and GP399, which only were significant at 100 ng/μL (Table 2). Among the strains that were significantly different from the spore-crystal-free control, there were 6 strains that produced a mortality rate above 80% (GP209, GP338, GP762, GP780, GP528, and GP322), 6 strains that were above 70% mortality (GP402, GP778, GP300, GP382, GP782, and GP640), and 3 strains were above 60% mortality (GP238, GP777, and GP60). The strain GP139 that was used as a positive control caused mortality rates above 80%. The strain HD1 used as a negative control was surprisingly toxic against M. persicae, with mortality rates above 70%. Of the 17 strains that caused high mortality, 12 were isolated from dead insects belonging to Aphididae, 2 from Psyllidae, 2 from Coccidae, and 1 from Cercopidae.

Table 2.

Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains to Myzus persicae.

t02_639.gif

VIRULENCE OF 17 BT STRAINS TO M. PERSICAE AND PROTEIN PROFILES OF THE STRAINS

To determine the virulence (LC50) of the B. thuringiensis strains against M. persicae, bioassays were carried out with the spore—crystal suspensions using 7 concentrations. Three strains were highly virulent and had LC50 values from 4 to 5 ng/μL (GP640, GP399, and GP238), 9 strains had values from 6 to 7 ng/μL (GP322, GP139, GP762, GP338, GP300, GP402, GP382, GP528, and GP782), and 6 strains had values above 9 ng/μL (HD1, GP209, GP777, GP778, GP60, and GP780) (Table 3). However, comparing the LC90 values, we observed that some of the strains required 13- to 42-fold higher concentrations, e.g., GP60 (257.3 ng/μL), GP780 (370.7 ng/μL), and GP782 (478.7 ng/μL), compared with strains in which low concentrations were effective, e.g., GP528 (11.48 ng/μL), HD1 (11.79 ng/μL), GP402 (13.9 ng/μL), GP300 (14.20 ng/μL), and GP777 (19.2 ng/μL) (Table 3). The protein profiles of the strains showed major bands with the following molecular weights: 30, 65, 70, 75, 100, 110, 120, 130, 200, and 250 kDa (Fig. 1).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to characterize 40 strains of B. thuringiensis isolates from corpses of hemipteran insects for the purpose of finding strains pathogenic to M. persicae, one of the most important agricultural pests worldwide. There is little information about the toxicity of B. thuringiensis proteins to aphids. Previous studies reported the activity of some toxins against several species; however, none are commercially available. Pathogenicity is the ability of an organism to infect a host and cause a disease. Furthermore, it is a requirement for virulence. However, in some cases, the organism can infect the host but not cause its death (Stephen & Elkinton 2004). The bioassays performed in this study with the spore—crystal suspensions of B. thuringiensis showed that 17 strains were pathogenic to M. persicae at both tested concentrations of 10 ng/μL and 100 ng/μL. They caused mortality rates of ≥⃒60% statistically different from the spore-crystal-free control, with the exception of strains GP865 and GP399, which caused significant mortality only at 100 ng/μL. For this reason, these strains were not tested in the bioassays for the determination of virulence (LC50). The strains that were used as a positive control (GP139) and a negative control (HD1) were also toxic, with mortality rates above 70%. It is known that the commercial strain HD1 is specific for lepidopteran insects (Dulmage 1970); however, when HD1 was field tested on whitefly nymphs (Sternorrhyncha), the results indicated a decrease in the population (Radman et al. 1984). This strain also showed activity against Tagosodes orizicolus (Auchenorrhyncha), with mortality rates above 80% (Mora et al. 2007).

These results suggest that this strain can express toxins with activity against some hemipterans. The insecticidal protein genes that it has are: cry1Aa, cry1Ab, cry1Ac, cry2A, and cry2B. Few previous studies evaluated the efficacy of B. thuringiensis against sucking insects. For example, the spore—crystal complex LFB-039 of B. thuringiensis subsp. morrisoni was evaluated in Triatoma vitticeps Stål (Hemiptera: Reduviidae); however, this strain did not show activity (Lima et al. 1994). Another work evaluated the toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab against Lygus hesperus Knight (Hemiptera: Miridae) without finding mortality (Brandt et al. 2004). Wellman-Desbiens & Coté (2005) also did not find Bt-induced mortality in L. hesperus. Conversely, a δ-endotoxin from B. thuringiensis subsp. neoleonensis (Cyt) was evaluated against L. hesperus and caused 68% mortality at 45 μg/mL (Stockhoff & Conlan 1998). Another study showed that 1 mg/mL of strain HD137 and 4 isolates of Bacillus sp. (23-O-to, 40-X-m, 43-S-d, and 26-O-to) were toxic to T. orizicolus with mortality rates of 19, 74, 96, 44, and 95%, respectively (Mora et al. 2007).

Table 3.

Virulence of Bacillus thuringiensis strains to Myzus persicae.

t03_639.gif

The majority of the 17 strains identified as pathogenic in this study were effective at low protein concentration (10 ng/μL) causing mortality rates above 70%. However, the toxicity to M. persicae was not the same for all strains, which is most likely related to the expression of different proteins or other pathogenicity factors. Of the 17 effective strains, 12 were isolated from dead insects belonging to Aphididae, 2 were from Psyllidae, 2 were from Coccidae, and 1 was from Cercopidae. These results agree with the proposed idea that the insecticidal proteins from B. thuringiensis are specific for a certain insect group, and that the strains isolated from the insect corpse belonging to a particular order may be pathogenic to insects of the same order (Angus & Norris 1968; Dulmage 1970; Pinto et al. 2003).

There are other works that support our results: De Barjac & Thompson (1969) isolated a strain from a dead larva of Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) that was identified as B. thuringiensis subsp. thompsoni, and when they conducted bioassays for pathogenicity with the same species and 2 other species of Lepidoptera, this strain was toxic. Konecka et al. (2007) analyzed 12 strains of B. thuringiensis that were isolated during an epizootic in the larvae of Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and when they tested the isolates against larvae from the same species, they were toxic. Krieg et al. (1983) isolated a strain from Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) that showed activity against several species of Coleoptera.

When we determined the virulence (LC50) of the 17 strains plus HD1 that were pathogenic to M. persicae, we found strains with values that were effective at rates from 4 to 5 ng/μL (GP238, GP399, and GP640), from 6 to 7 ng/μL (GP322, GP139, GP762, GP338, GP300, GP402, GP382, GP528, and GP782), from 8 to 9 ng/μL (GP865 and HD1), and others with values higher than 10 ng/μL (GP209, GP777, GP778, GP60, and GP780). These results suggest that the best strains for controlling M. persicae are those strains with an LC50 ranging from 4 to 5 ng/μL; however, the LC90 values of these 3 strains were 10 times greater, ranging from 42 to 66 ng/μL.

Conversely, there were 4 strains with LC90 values that did not change much with respect to their LC50 values, such as strain HD1 (LC50 = 9.10 ng/μL; LC90 = 11.79 ng/μL), GP777 (LC50 = 10 ng/μL; LC90 = 19.2 ng/μL), GP300 (LC50 = 6.88 ng/μL; LC90 = 14.20 ng/μL), and GP528 (LC50 = 7.86 ng/μL; LC90 = 11.48 ng/μL). The LC50 values of Cry2, Cry3, Cry11, and Cry4 toxins on M. euphorbiae were 200, 300, 350, and 400 ng/μL, respectively (Walters & English 1995). Porcar et al. (2009) tested the toxins Cry3A, Cry4A, Cry11A, and Cyt1A against A. pisum and obtained LC50 values of 70 ng/μL for Cry3A and 100 ng/μL for the rest of the toxins; similarly, Huarong et al. (2011) showed that LC50 of Cry3A and Cry1A toxins against A. pisum where 500 ng/μL for both toxins. Palma et al. (2014) found a new B. thuringiensis protein that was toxic to M. persicae with an LC50 value of 32.7 ng/μL. Sattar & Maitti (2011) identified a homologous protein to Vip2A toxic to Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) with an LC50 value of 0.356 ng/μL.

Fig. 1.

Protein profiles of the strains virulent to Myzus persicae. Lane 1: GP640, Lane 2: GP399, Lane 3: GP238, Lane 4: GP322, Lane 5: GP139, Lane 6: GP762, Lane 7: GP339, Lane 8: GP300, Lane 9: HD1, Lane 10: GP402, Lane 11: GP382, Lane 12: GP528, Lane 13: GP782, Lane 14: GP209, Lane 15: GP777, Lane 16: GP778, Lane 17: GP60, Lane 18: GP780.

f01_639.jpg

Comparing our results with these, with the exception of the values reported by Sattar & Maitti (2011), the LC50 values of the strains evaluated in this study were up to 50 times lower. Da Costa et al. (2010) suggested that the best strains of B. thuringiensis to control Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) were those with the lowest values of both LC50 and LC90. Accordingly, we suggest that the best strains to control M. persicae are those with the smallest values of both LC50 and LC90. The strains that meet these requirements are GP777, GP300, GP528, and HD1. These strains may have the potential to be used to suppress populations of the green peach aphid.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge CONACYT (National Council of Science and Technology). This work was part of the Master of Science thesis by Mary Carmen Torres Quintero, which was supported by CONACYT (grant 4192164/258757). We are grateful to M. en C. Adriana G. Trejo Loyo for technical assistance in identifying the aphids.

References Cited

1.

Angus TA, Norris JA. 1968. A comparison of the toxicity of some varieties of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner for silkworm larvae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 11: 289–295. Google Scholar

2.

Aronson AI. 1993. The two faces of Bacillus thuringiensis: insecticidal proteins and post-exponential survival. Molecular Microbiology 7: 489–496. Google Scholar

3.

Aronson AI. 2002. Sporulation and δ-endotoxin synthesis by Bacillus thuringiensis. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 59: 417–425. Google Scholar

4.

Blackman RL, Eastop VF. 1984. Aphids on the World's Crops. An Identification Guide. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

5.

Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein—dye binding. Analytical Biochemestry 72: 248–254. Google Scholar

6.

Brandt SL, Coudron TA, Habibi J, Brown GR, Llagan OM, Wagner RM, Wright MK, Backus EA, Huesing JE. 2004. Interaction of two Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins with the digestive system of Lygus hesperus. Current Microbiology 48: 1–9. Google Scholar

7.

Burgio G, Lanzoni A, Accinelli G, Dinelli G, Bonetti A, Marotti I, Ramble F. 2007. Evaluation of Bt-toxin uptake by the non-target herbivore, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), feeding on transgenic oilseed rape. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97: 211–215. Google Scholar

8.

Burgio G, Dinelli G, Marotti I, Zurla M, Bosi S, Lanzoni A. 2011. Bt-toxin uptake by the non-target herbivore, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), feeding on transgenic oilseed rape in laboratory conditions. Bulletin of Entomological Research 101: 241–247. Google Scholar

9.

Chougule NP, Bonning BC. 2012. Toxins for transgenic resistance to hemipteran pests. Toxins 4: 405–429. Google Scholar

10.

Da Costa JRV, Rossi JR, Marucci SC, Da Calvez EC, Volpe HXL, Ferraudo AS, Lemos MVF, Desidério JA. 2010. Atividade tóxica de Bacillus thuringiensis a larvas de Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Neotropical Entomology 39: 757–766. Google Scholar

11.

De Barjac H, Thompson JV. 1969. A new serotype of Bacillus thuringiensis: B. thuringiensis var. thompsoni (serotype II). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 15: 141–144. Google Scholar

12.

Dulmage HT. 1970. Insecticidal activity of HD1, a new isolate of Bacillus thuringiensis var. alesti. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 15: 232–239. Google Scholar

13.

Foster SP, Denholm I, Devonshire AL. 2000. The ups and downs of insecticide resistance in peach—potato aphids (Myzus persicae) in the UK. Crop Protection 19: 873–879. Google Scholar

14.

Huarong L, Nanasaheb P, Chougule P, Bonning BC. 2011. Interaction of Bacillus thuringiensis delta endotoxin Cry1Ac and Cry3Aa with the gut of pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 107: 69–78. Google Scholar

15.

Jancovich JK, Davidson EW, Lavine M, Hendrix DL. 1997. Feeding chamber and diet for culture of nymphal Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 90: 628–633. Google Scholar

16.

Konecka E, Kaznowski A, Ziemnicka J, Ziemnicki K, Paetz H. 2007. Analysis of cry gene profile in Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated during epizootics in Cydia pomonella L. Current Microbiology 55: 217–222. Google Scholar

17.

Krieg VA, Huger AM, Langenbruch GA, Schnetter M. 1983. Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis: ein neuer gegenüber Larven von Coleopteren wirksamer Pathotyp. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 96: 500–508. Google Scholar

18.

Lacey LA, Frutos R, Kaya HK, Vail P. 2001. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Do they have a future? Biological Control 21: 230–248. Google Scholar

19.

Lima MM, Matos LM, Luz MH, Rabinovitch L. 1994. Effects of the spore—endotoxin complex of a strain of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar morrisoni upon Triatoma vitticeps (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) under laboratory conditions. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 89: 403–405. Google Scholar

20.

Manachini B, Casati P, Cinanni L, Bianco P. 2007. Role of Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and its secondary host in plum pox virus propagation. Journal of Economic Entomology 100: 1047–1052. Google Scholar

21.

Mora R, Ibarra JE, Espinoza AM. 2007. A reliable bioassay procedure to evaluate per os toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains against the rice delphacid, Tagosodes orizicolus (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Revista de Biología Tropical 55: 373–383. Google Scholar

22.

Palma L, Muñoz D, Berry C, Murillo J, Ruiz de Escudero I, Caballero P. 2014. Molecular and insecticidal characterization of a novel Cry-related protein from Bacillus thuringiensis toxic against Myzus persicae. Toxins 6: 3144–3156. Google Scholar

23.

Pascal DL, Sabri A, Heuskin S, Thonart P, Lognay G, Verheggen FJ, Francis F, Brostaux Y, Felton GW, Haubruge E. 2010. Microorganisms from aphid honeydew attract and enhance the efficacy of natural enemies. Nature Review Microbiology 9: 1–7. Google Scholar

24.

Pinto LMN, Azambuja AO, Diehl E, Fiuza LM. 2003. Pathogenicity of Bacillus thuringiensis isolated from two species of Acromyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Brazilian Journal of Biology 63: 301–306. Google Scholar

25.

Porcar M, Grenier AM, Federici B, Rhahbé Y. 2009. Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins on the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 4897–4900. Google Scholar

26.

Radman HSA, Ammar IMA, Eisa AA, Omar HIH, Moftah EAM. 1984. Latent effects of certain Bacillus preparations on the biology of the cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 417–429. Google Scholar

27.

Robertson JL, Preisler HK, Russell RM. 2003. Polo Plus Probit and Logit Analysis, User's Guide. LeOra Software. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California. Google Scholar

28.

Salazar-Magallon JA, Hernández-Velázquez VM, Alvear-García A, Arenas-Sosa I, Peña-Chora G. 2015. Evaluation of industrial by-products for the production of Bacillus thuringiensis strain GP139 and the pathogenicity when applied to Bemisia tabaci nymphs. Bulletin of Insectology 68: 103–109. Google Scholar

29.

SAS Institute. 2002. SAS Statistics User's Manual. Version 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. Google Scholar

30.

Sattar S, Maiti MK. 2011. Molecular characterization of a novel vegetative insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis against sap-sucking insect pest. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 21: 937–946. Google Scholar

31.

Schnepf E, Crickmore N, van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR, Dean DH. 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 62: 775–806. Google Scholar

32.

Schuler TH, Clark AJ, Clark SJ, Poppy GM, Stewart CN, Denholm I. 2005. Laboratory studies of the effects of reduced prey choice caused by Bt plants on a predatory insect. Bulletin of Entomological Research 95: 243–247. Google Scholar

33.

Stephen RT, Elkinton JS. 2004. Pathogenicity and virulence. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 85: 146–151. Google Scholar

34.

Stockhoff B, Conlan C. 1998. Controlling hemipteran insect pests with Bacillus thuringiensis. U.S. Patent 5,723, 440. Google Scholar

35.

Torres-Quintero MC, Arenas-Sosa I, Peña-Chora G, Hernández-Velázquez VM. 2013. Feeding chamber for Myzus persicae culture (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Florida Entomologist 96: 1600–1602. Google Scholar

36.

Torres-Quintero M, Peña-Chora G, Hernández-Velázquez VM, Arenas-Sosa I. 2015. Signs of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) infection in Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae): Koch´s postulates. Florida Entomologist 98: 799–802. Google Scholar

37.

Van Frankenhuyzen K. 2009. Insecticidal activity of B. thuringiensis crystal proteins. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 101: 1–16. Google Scholar

38.

Walters FS, English LH. 1995. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins toward the potato aphid in an artificial diet bioassay. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 77: 211–216. Google Scholar

39.

Wellman-Desbiens E, Cote JC. 2005. Development of Bacillus thuringiensis—based assay on Lygus hesperus. Journal of Economic Entomology 98: 1469–1479. Google Scholar
Mary Carmen Torres-Quintero, Iván Arenas-Sosa, Víctor Manuel Hernández-Velázquez, Ramón Suárez-Rodríguez, and Guadalupe Peña-Chora "Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillaceae) Strains Pathogenic to Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae)," Florida Entomologist 99(4), 639-643, (1 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0409
Published: 1 December 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top