Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2016 Difference in the Abundance of Scale Insect Parasitoids Among Four Cardinal Directions
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We conducted a study to assess the potential differences in the abundances of hymenopteran parasitoids among cardinal directions. Experiments were conducted on scale insect-infested willow oak trees in the urban landscapes of South Carolina and Virginia. The parasitoids captured on yellow sticky cards deployed at the cardinal directions of the trees were identified and counted. We found that there were no significant differences in scale insect and parasitoid abundances among cardinal directions, and parasitoid abundances were weakly correlated with scale insect densities. The results suggest that 1 yellow sticky card could be deployed per tree, regardless of tree quadrant, to sufficiently sample for parasitoid abundance.

Assessment of the impact of biological control requires a reliable method of estimating the densities and spatial distribution patterns of natural enemies and their prey or hosts. There is no consistent pattern in the distribution and abundance of insect pests among tree canopy quadrants. The proportions of 3 thrips species captured on yellow, white, and blue sticky cards were not significantly different among the 4 cardinal directions (Hoddle et al. 2002). The densities of California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), and citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), were not significantly different among the cardinal directions (Meyerdirk et al. 1981; Orphanides et al. 1984), whereas those of mango mealybug, Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), on the southern quadrant (Boavida et al. 1992) and of black scale, Saissetia oleae (Olivier) (Hemiptera: Coccidae), on the northern quadrant were higher than on other quadrants (Podoler et al. 1979). To the best of our knowledge, there is no published information on the distribution pattern of scale insect parasitoids within a tree canopy.

We conducted this experiment to assess differences in the abundance of scale insect parasitoids among the 4 cardinal directions. Groups of in-ground, mature willow oak trees, Quercus phellos L. (Fagaceae), were sampled in Florence, South Carolina (SC; 6 trees at 1 site), and Virginia Beach, Virginia (VA; 2 sites, 1 tree per site). The trees were 7 to 9 m tall, 10 to 30 cm in trunk diameter at 1.4 m from the ground (at breast height, or DBH), 5 to 6 m in canopy width, and were growing in narrow islands (covered with turfgrass and surrounded by pavement) in parking lots. All trees were infested by mixed populations of oak lecanium, Parthenolecanium quercifex (Fitch), and European fruit lecanium, Parthenolecanium corni (Bouché) (Hemiptera: Coccidae). These species are commonly found on shade trees in the urban landscapes of the eastern United States. The oak trees were not treated with insecticides during the study.

Yellow sticky cards (7.5 × 12.5 cm) were deployed, 1 at each of the 4 cardinal directions, 1.5 to 1.8 m from the ground, and close to the edge of the canopy. All cards were collected and replaced weekly at each site from Apr to Sep 2011 in VA, and Mar to Aug 2012 in SC. Each yellow sticky card was divided into fifteen 6.25 cm2 squares per side. Five squares were selected for determining parasitoid morphospecies and density on 1 side of the card. The 5 squares and the side of the card examined were chosen randomly (Urbaniak & Plous 2014). The parasitoid densities obtained from the 5 selected squares were extrapolated to estimate the total abundance on 1 side of each card. Parasitoid species composition in each state was determined. Differences in parasitoid abundance among cardinal directions and sampling times were assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (PROC GLM; SAS Institute 2011) in each state for 1) all parasitoid species combined, and 2) the 3 most abundant parasitoid species (at least 10% of the total parasitoid population).

Scale densities were determined for each cardinal direction of each oak tree in SC. One 10- to 15-cm-long twig was collected from each cardinal direction on the same day the sticky cards were collected. The scale insects on each twig were counted in the laboratory, and the densities were calculated as the total numbers of scale insects (adults and nymphs) per cm. Differences in scale insect densities among cardinal directions and sampling dates were assessed by repeated measures ANOVA (PROC GLM; SAS Institute 2011). Spearman correlation was conducted to assess correlation between parasitoid abundance and scale insect density in each cardinal direction (PROC CORR; SAS Institute 2011).

Twenty-one parasitoid species were collected, of which 19 species were found in SC and 16 species in VA (Table 1). Seven encyrtid (Blastothrix sp. 1 and 2, Encyrtus sp. 1, 2 and 3, Metaphycus sp. 2, and Plagiomerus sp.), 4 aphelinid (Ablerus sp., Coccophagus lycimnia (Walker), Coccophagus sp. 1, Coccophagoides sp.), 2 pteromalid (Eunotus sp., Pachyneuron sp.), and 1 eulophid (Aprostocetus sp.) species occurred in both states. Four encyrtid (Leptomastix sp., Metaphycus sp. 1, and Microterys sp. 1 and 2) and 1 aphelinid (Marietta sp.) species were found exclusively in SC, whereas 1 aphelinid (Coccophagus sp. 2) and 1 encyrtid (Ceraptocerus sp.) species were found only in VA. Coccophagus lycimnia and Eunotus sp. were the most abundant species in both states, followed by Blastothrix sp. 1 in SC and Metaphycus sp. 2 in VA (Table 1).

Analyses of variance for all parasitoid species did not detect differences in parasitoid abundances among the 4 cardinal directions in SC (F = 0.59; df = 3, 24; P = 0.6304) or VA (F = 2.85; df = 3, 4; P = 0.1689). However, abundances varied through time (week) in SC (F = 81.26; df = 26, 624; P < 0.0001) and VA (F = 14.47; df = 22, 88; P < 0.0001). An interaction between abundance and time was detected (SC: F = 1.46; df = 78, 624; P < 0.0089; VA: F = 1.46; df = 66, 88; P < 0.0486).

The abundances of dominant species found were similar among the 4 cardinal directions: C. lycimnia (SC: F = 1.15; df = 3, 24; P = 0.3474; VA: F = 1.46; df = 3, 4; P = 0.3524) (Fig. 1), Eunotus sp. (SC: F = 0.22; df = 3, 24; P = 0.8810; VA: F = 3.88; df = 3, 4; P = 0.1117), Blastothrix sp. 1 (SC: F = 2.06; df = 3, 24; P = 0.1327), and Metaphycus sp. 2 (VA: F = 0.17; df = 3, 4; P = 0.9144). Abundances varied from week to week in all cases: C. lycimnia (SC: F = 83.20; df = 26, 622; P < 0.0001; VA: F = 13.66; df = 22, 81; P < 0.0001), Eunotus sp. (SC: F = 98.44; df = 26, 622; P < 0.0010; VA: F = 22.16; df = 22, 87; P < 0.0001), Blastothrix sp. 1 (SC: F = 142.85; df = 26, 622; P < 0.0001), and Metaphycus sp. 2 (VA: F = 9.99; df = 22, 87; P < 0.0001). Interactions between cardinal directions and time were not significant in most cases: C. lycimnia (SC: F = 1.05; df = 28, 622; P = 0.3597; VA: F = 1.28; df = 66, 87; P = 0.1412), Eunotus sp. (SC: F = 0.74; df = 28, 622; P = 0.9484), Blastothrix sp. 1 (SC: F = 0.67; df = 28, 622; P = 0.9869), and Metaphycus sp. 2 (VA: F = 0.66; df = 66, 87; P = 0.9597). Eunotus sp. densities in VA exhibited a higher abundance in the eastern quadrant from mid- to late Apr, and a higher abundance in the southern quadrant from mid-May to early Jun (F = 5.14, df = 66, 87, P < 0.0001).

Table 1.

Parasitoid morphospecies trapped on sticky cards deployed on willow oaks infested with Parthenolecanium spp. in South Carolina and Virginia.

t01_813.gif

In SC, scale insect densities did not differ among cardinal directions (F = 0.84; df = 3, 644; P = 0.4744). Scale insect densities were greatest in the earlier part of the year (F = 10.77; df = 3, 598; P < 0.0001). As adults completed reproduction and died, the densities of scale insects declined over time. Parasitoid densities were significantly, but weakly, correlated to scale insect densities in all cardinal directions (east: P = 0.0013, ρ = 0.2524; north: P < 0.0001, ρ = 0.3576; south: P = 0.0034, ρ = 0.2290; west: P = 0.0015, ρ = 0.2495). The result suggests that the parasitoid abundance was weakly dependent upon the scale insect densities at each cardinal direction.

Yellow sticky traps are frequently used to monitor insect diversity and seasonal activity, particularly of small insects (Hoelmer et al. 1998; Hoddle et al. 2002). Yellow sticky traps are known to attract many species of parasitoids, including aphelinids, encyrtids, and pteromalids (Neuenschwander 1982; Moreno et al. 1984; Schultz 1984, 1985, 1990; Samways 1986; McClain et al. 1990; Hoelmer et al. 1998). Schultz (1984, 1985, 1990) reported on abundances of natural enemies of P. quercifex (especially hymenopteran parasitoids) with yellow sticky cards. However, Schultz (1984, 1985, 1990) did not assess distributions of the parasitoids among tree quadrants. In our study, there were no differences in the abundances of parasitoids and scale insects among the cardinal directions, but the parasitoid abundance was weakly correlated to scale insect density in each cardinal direction. The small sample size of this study (i.e., 8 trees in SC and 2 trees in VA) may not be sufficient to detect statistical differences in parasitoid and scale insect densities among the cardinal directions. Future studies with larger sample size and number of sites would be needed to confirm the observations of this study. Despite this shortcoming, the results of this study suggest that a single sticky card per tree could be used for assessing parasitoid abundance, independently of the quadrant where the trap is deployed. The use of only 1 sticky card per tree can reduce the time, labor, and material costs of sampling.

Fig. 1.

Abundance of Coccophagus lycimnia captured with yellow sticky cards at the cardinal directions on willow oaks in (A) South Carolina and (B) Virginia. E = East, N = north, S = south, W = west.

f01_813.jpg

This manuscript is Technical Contribution No. 6436 of the Clemson University Experiment Station, and is based upon work supported by the United States Department of Agriculture's National Institute of Food and Agriculture under project numbers 2010-34103-21144, SC-1700351, and SC-1700473, and the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station. Shawn Chandler, Shannon Cook, and Weber Mimms (Clemson University) assisted in sample collection, Andrew Ernst (North Carolina State University) assisted in the identification of parasitoids to the genus level, and Ian Stocks and Greg Hodges (Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry) assisted with the identification of scale insects.

References Cited

1.

Boavida C, Neuenschwander P, Schulthess F. 1992. Spatial distribution of Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hom, Pseudococcidae) in mango trees. Journal of Applied Entomology-Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 114: 381–391. Google Scholar

2.

Hoddle MS, Robinson L, Morgan D. 2002. Attraction of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae and Aeolothripidae) to colored sticky cards in a California avocado orchard. Crop Protection 21: 383–388. Google Scholar

3.

Hoelmer KA, Roltsch WJ, Chu CC, Henneberry TJ. 1998. Selectivity of whitefly traps in cotton for Eretmocerus eremicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a native parasitoid of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Environmental Entomology 27: 1039–1044. Google Scholar

4.

McClain DC, Rock GC, Woolley JB. 1990. Influence of trap color and San Jose scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) pheromone on sticky trap catches of 10 aphelinid parasitoids (Hymenoptera). Environmental Entomology 19: 926–931. Google Scholar

5.

Meyerdirk DE, Chandler LD, Summy KR, Hart WG. 1981. Spatial distribution of citrus mealybug (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) on grapefruit trees. Journal of Economic Entomology 74: 662–664. Google Scholar

6.

Moreno DS, Gregory WA, Tanigoshi LK. 1984. Flight response of Aphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) and Scirtothrips citri (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) to trap color, size, and shape. Environmental Entomology 13: 935–940. Google Scholar

7.

Neuenschwander P. 1982. Beneficial insects caught by yellow traps used in mass-trapping of the olive fly, Dacus soleae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 32: 286–296. Google Scholar

8.

Orphanides G. 1984. Population dynamics of the California red scale Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) (Homoptera: Diaspididae) on citrus in Cyprus. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Entomologia Agraria Filippo Silvestri 41: 195–210. Google Scholar

9.

Podoler H, Barzacay I, Rosen D. 1979. Population-dynamics of the Mediterranean black scale Saissetia oleae (Olivier), on citrus in Israel. 2. Distribution within the citrus tree. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa 42: 267–273. Google Scholar

10.

Samways MJ. 1986. Spatial and temporal population patterns of Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae and Encyrtidae) caught on yellow sticky traps in citrus. Bulletin of Entomological Research 76: 265–274. Google Scholar

11.

SAS Institute. 2011. SAS/STAT® 9.3. User's Guide. The GLM procedure. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. Google Scholar

12.

Schultz PB. 1984. Natural enemies of oak lecanium (Homoptera: Coccidae) in eastern Virginia. Environmental Entomology 13: 1515–1518. Google Scholar

13.

Schultz PB. 1985. Monitoring parasites of the oak lecanium scale with yellow sticky traps. Journal of Arboriculture 11: 182–184. Google Scholar

14.

Schultz PB. 1990. Forecasting flight activity of native parasitoids of oak lecanium (Homoptera: Coccidae). Journal of Entomological Science 25: 622–627. Google Scholar

15.

Urbaniak GC, Plous S. 2014. Research Randomizer, Version 4.0. Computer software. Available online:  http://www.randomizer.org/ (last accessed 20 Sep 2016). Google Scholar
Ernesto Robayo Camacho, Juang-Horng Chong, and Peter B. Schultz "Difference in the Abundance of Scale Insect Parasitoids Among Four Cardinal Directions," Florida Entomologist 99(4), 813-815, (1 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0445
Published: 1 December 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top