Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2013 Contact zones and ranges of chromosomal races of the common Shrew, Sorex araneus, in north-eastern European Russia
Nikolay A. Shchipanov, Svetlana V. Pa vlova
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The common shrew is a major evolutionary model for understanding the factors that lead to chromosomal subdivision; it is one of the most chromosomally variable species. We karyotyped 106 common shrews (Sorex araneus) from 24 localities in north-eastern European Russia which we showed to belong to five chromosomal races: Kirillov, Manturovo, Petchora, Serov and Sok. These new data were combined with published results on 146 individuals from 55 localities (with three additional races: Kanin, Yagry and Yuryuzan) to provide a substantive analysis of chromosomal variation in this region. The ranges of the eight races were mapped, the areas of contacts between neighbouring races were determined and new interracial hybrid zones were localised. In total, F1 hybrid karyotypes were found in 22 individuals from 11 localities; including our demonstration of Manturovo-Petchora, Manturovo-Sok, Petchora-Serov, Petchora-Sok and Serov-Sok F1 hybrid karyotypes for the first time. These hybrids would be expected to produce ring-of-four, ring-of-six or ring-of-eight meiotic configurations. The distribution of the races could not readily be related to environmental or geographic features, and in particular major rivers did not appear important in separation of races. This represents one of the most detailed studies of chromosomal variation in the common shrews at a regional geographic scale and is of especial significance because north-eastern European Russia has been little affected by human activity, and therefore the results are likely to represent fully natural processes.

Introduction

Due to its extremely high karyotypic variability, the common shrew Sorex araneus is an extraordinary model for evolutionary studies ( Searle & Wójcik 1998). It is a small insectivorous mammal ( order Eulipotyphla, family Soricidae) subdivided into at least 72 parapatric chromosomal races, each characterised by a unique set of metacentric chromosomes formed by Robertsonian fusions and/or whole-arm reciprocal translocations (WARTs; Hausser et al. 1994, Wójcik et al. 2003, White et al. 2010). Among mammals this degree of within-species chromosomal subdivision is only matched by the house mouse Mus musculus (Piálek et al. 2005), a species whose chromosomal variation is tied to a colonisation history linked to humans ( Gabriel et al. 2010). There is a need to understand why the common shrew should be chromosomally variable in such a dramatic way.

The common shrew is distributed over an area ranging from the British Isles and the Pyrenees in the west to Central Siberia in the east. The northern part of the European range is of especial interest in terms of the origin of new karyotypic forms (Halkka et al. 1987, 1994, Fredga 1996, 2007, Pavlova 2010), and the pattern of postglacial recolonisation (Hewitt 2000, Polyakov et al. 2001, Orlov et al. 2007), due to both diversity of chromosomal races and complex glacial history of the region. The chromosomal races in this area can be attributed to an origin in glacial refugia in southern parts of Europe (Hewitt 1999, Polyakov et al. 2001), and subsequent long-distance spread northwards; in situ or nearby origin in northern glacial refugia (Bilton et al. 1998, Orlov & Kozlovsky 2002, Orlov et al. 2007); or postglacial origin in situ or nearby (Wójcik 1993). Anthropogenic alterations to the natural landscape may also contribute to the current distribution of the races and their interactions. For example, the narrow hybrid zone between the Białowieża and Drnholec races in Poland is located at a railway embankment (Szałaj et al. 1996) and anthropogenic changes to landscape structure might promote genetic differentiation among hybridizing shrew populations in the Ļęgucki Młyn-Guzowy Młyn hybrid zone (Ratkiewicz et al. 2003).

Table 1.

New karyotypic data on common shrews from north-eastern European Russia. Only the race-specific chromosomes are listed and karyotypic categories include: a) individuals with a homozygous Kirillov (Kr), Petchora (Pt), Sok (So), Manturovo (Ma) and Serov (Se) karyotype; b) simple heterozygotes (denoted as Kr j/l, etc.); and c) complex heterozygotes (e.g. Kr-Pt hybrid, i.e. F1 hybrid between Kirillov and Petchora races). Expected meiotic configurations for simple and complex heterozygotes are indicated as CIII (chain-of-three), RIV (ring-of-four), RVI (ring-of-six) and RVIII (ring-ofeight). The interracial karyotypes described for the first time are marked in bold. For some localities there were previous data; karyotypes of individuals published in Pavlova & Bulatova (2010) are indicated by one asterisk, and those published in Shchipanov et al. (2008) by two asterisks.

t01a_24.gif

Continued

t01b_24.gif

Part of the northern European range of the common shrew that has received particular attention in recent years for study of chromosomal races and their contact areas/hybrid zones is north-eastern European Russia (Orlov & Kozlovsky 2002, Shchipanov et al. 2005a, 2008, 2009a, Bystrakova et al. 2007, Orlov et al. 2007). Here we extend that analysis to generate a coverage that is one of the most detailed for a geographic area of this size in the common shrew and incorporating a substantial number of races. This region is of particular interest because it is still covered by virgin forests, unique for Europe (Taskaev 2006), and consequently, the species distribution should have been impacted barely at all by humans. This makes north-eastern Russia ideal for an understanding of the natural processes involved in creating the current distribution of chromosomal races of common shrews.

Material and Methods

Study area

The focus of the study was the region of European Russia on the left bank of the River Volga; in particular, the south-eastern part of Arkhangelsk Region, and the central and south-western part of Komi Republic (N 56°°38′-64°45′ and E 47°16′-56°39′) (Table 1). The eastern part of this area (from the southern slope of the Timan Ridge to the Ural Mountains) is covered by forests with a large component of Siberian vegetation. The area is divided into two taiga subzones: mid taiga and northern taiga. The northern taiga biome occupies an area northward from the lower reaches of the River North Dvina, middle parts of the Mezen and Pechora rivers and the upper catchment of the River Ilych. The northern forest limit extends between the estuary of the River Mezen, the lower reaches of the River Pechora and the upper catchment of the River Usa before descending several hundred kilometres southward following the hills of the northern Ural Mountains (Taskaev 2006).

Specimens and chromosome analysis

A total of 106 common shrews were collected at 24 new localities in July 2007 and in September–October 2008–2009 (Table 1) using home-made live traps (Shchipanov 1986) and a specific protocol for sampling red-toothed shrews (Shchipanov et al. 2005b), which greatly facilitated the sampling over such a vast area.

Standard mitotic chromosome preparations of each animal were made in the field from the bone marrow and/or spleen after colchicine treatment in vivo following Ford & Hamerton (1956) with some modifications (Bulatova et al. 2009). The trypsin - Giemsa staining technique of Král & Radjabli (1974) was used for identification of each chromosome arm by G-bands. The racial status of each individual was determined according to the standard nomenclature for the karyotype of the common shrew (Searle et al. 1991) and described in terms of the metacentrics and free acrocentrics comprising the autosomal arms g-r (Searle & Wójcik 1998). The metacentrics are described by two letters (e.g. gi) and acrocentrics by a single letter (e.g. j). Heterozygotes are indicated as simple heterozygotes (e.g. j/l for an individual with metacentric jl and two acrocentrics j and l) and complex heterozygotes (e.g. km/mr/qr/kq for an individual with metacentrics kq, km, mr and qr) following the definition in Searle (1993).

Table 2.

Previously published karyotype data for common shrews from north-eastern European Russia (only race-specific chromosomes indicated) with karyotypic categories as in Table 1 (with the Kanin /Kn/, Yagry /Ya/ and Yuryuzan /Yu/ races in addition). The type locality of each race is marked by an asterisk.

References: 1 - Polyakov et al. 1997; 2 - Bulatova et al. 2000; 3 - Kozlovsky et al. 2000; 4 - Polyakov et al. 2000; 5 - Polyakov et al. 2001; 6 - Orlov & Kozlovsky 2002; 7 - Shchipanov et al. 2002; 8 - Bystrakova et al. 2003; 9 - Orlov et al. 2004; 10 - Wójcik et al. 2003; 11 - Shchipanov et al. 2005a; 12 - Pavlova et al. 2006; 13 - Bystrakova et al. 2007; 14 - Orlov et al. 2007; 15 - Shchipanov et al. 2008; 16 - Shchipanov et al. 2009a; 17 - Shchipanov et al. 2009b; 18 - Pavlova & Bulatova 2010; 19 - Fredga 1996.

t02a_24.gif

Continued

t02b_24.gif

Continued

t02c_24.gif

Capture locations were determined using a GPS (Garmin) personal navigation system and then imported to ArcView. The samples of karyotyped shrews in localities previously surveyed within the study area and published elsewhere are summarised in Table 2.

Results

Twenty four new localities, adding to the list of 55 previously known, provided new details on the distribution of the Kirillov, Manturovo, Petchora, Serov, and Sok chromosomal races (Fig. 1). We localised areas of hybridisation between the Kirillov and Manturovo, Manturovo and Petchora, Manturovo and Sok, Petchora and Serov, Petchora and Sok, and Serov and Sok races. The details are described below and in Table 1.

Kirillov race (Kr)

We found this race on the left bank of the River Mezen (site 5), and on both banks near the villages of Kyssa (nos. 7–10) and Vozhgora (sites 11–12) (Fig. 2). Locality 13 near the village of Malaya Pyssa, where the Kirillov race meets and hybridises with both the Manturovo and Petchora races, is the most easterly record for this race. Kirillov-Petchora F1 hybrids were found on both banks of the River Mezen (sites 8–9, 12) and on a river island (site 10). The karyotype of the Kirillov race differs by two pairs of metacentrics from the Manturovo race and by three pairs of metacentrics from the Petchora race such that their F1 hybrids would be expected to form ring-of-four (RIV: gm/go/no/mn) and ring-of-six (RVI: gm/gi/hi/hn/no/ mo) configurations at meiosis I, respectively.

Petchora race (Pt)

We found that the Petchora race crosses the River Mezen, and meets and hybridises with the Manturovo race on the left bank near Verkhnemezensk (site 17). An F1 hybrid between these races would be expected to produce an RVI configuration at meiosis I, but with a different chromosomal combination (go/gi/ hi/hn/mn/mo) from the Kirillov-Petchora F1 hybrid. Locality 18, where the Petchora race hybridises with the Serov race, indicates the southern limit of the Petchora race range (Fig. 3). The karyotype of the Petchora-Serov F1 hybrid is shown in Fig. 4A and includes chromosomes gi, hn, kq, mo, pr of the Petchora race and go, hn, km, ip, rq of the Serov race. Individuals with such a karyotype would form a RVIII configuration at meiosis I - gi/go/mo/ km/kq/qr/pr/ip - which is the longest ring meiotic configuration anticipated from any hybrid karyotype of the common shrew.

Fig. 1.

Map of the chromosomal races in north-eastern European Russia: Kanin (Kn), Yagry (Ya), Kirillov (Kr), Petchora (Pt), Sok (So), Manturovo (Ma), Serov (Se), Yuryuzan (Yu). Ranges were constructed around the outermost localities where each racial karyotype has been recorded. Numbers refer to the listing of sampling localities in Table 1 and 2.

f01_24.jpg

Fig. 2.

Distribution of common shrews of different chromosomal races and interracial hybrids around the middle part of the River Mezen. The area of each circle is proportional to sample size. See Table 1 and 2 for further details.

f02_24.jpg

Fig. 3.

Distribution of individual chromosomal races and interracial hybrids in the upper catchment area of the Mezen, Vychegda, and Pechora rivers. The area of each circle is proportional to sample size. See Table 1 and 2 for further details.

f03_24.jpg

Individuals with a pure Petchora race karyotype were found to the north and east of the Petchora-Serov hybrid locality (in localities 19 and 20). The Petchora race meets the Sok race close to the towns of Ukhta (site 21) and Sosnogorsk (site 22); both pure race and Petchora-Sok F1 hybrid individuals were found in the nearby localities 23 and 24. A Petchora-Sok F1 hybrid karyotypes would be expected to produce a meiotic RIV (go/gi/im/mo) and RVI (gi/go/mo/mr/pr/ ip) configurations, respectively (Table 1).

Serov race (Se)

We did not found pure Serov race individuals but did collect an F1 Serov-Sok hybrid together with pure Sok race individuals in locality 27, within homogeneous plain forest habitat (Figs. 1, 3). The Serov-Sok hybrid karyotype should be associated with a RIV meiotic configuration - km/mr/rq/kq (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4.

G-banded karyotypes of F1 hybrids: A - between the Petchora and Serov races, B - between the Serov and Sok races. The top row of each karyotype displays the autosomes found in all common shrews (bc, af, jl, tu) and the male sex chromosomes (XY2Y1). The bottom row shows the remaining autosomes which define the hybrid karyotypes.

f04_24.jpg

Sok race (So)

In the north-east of the region sampled we found three new Sok race localities along the road to Troitsko-Pechorsk (sites 54–56) and one more locality (27) where the Sok race meets and hybridises with the Serov race (see above). We also found an F1 hybrid between the Sok and Manturovo races, expected to form a RVI meiotic configuration (hn/hi/ip/pr/mr/mn).

Manturovo race (Ma)

Pure Manturovo race individuals were recorded at the town of Mikun' (site 63). Further north, in middle parts of the River Mezen, the Manturovo race makes contact with the Kirillov and Petchora races. At this location, the River Mezen forms a big loop and we found the Manturovo race inside the loop at localities 68–73 (Fig. 3, Table 1). Moreover, at the start of the loop (site 17), we recorded both the Manturovo and Petchora pure races, as well as their hybrids, and at the end of the loop (site 13) we found both Manturovo-Kirillov and Kirillov-Petchora hybrids (Fig. 3, Table 1).

Discussion

In total, we found five of the eight chromosomal races previously reported to occur in north-eastern European Russia. We did not collect individuals of the Kanin and Yagry races, which have been described from single localities (Fig. 1) from the Kanin peninsula (Fredga 1996) and Yagry Island in the North Dvina river delta (Orlov et al. 2007), respectively. The nearest locality to these type sites that we surveyed was locality 5, situated 420 km south of Kanin and 270 km east of Yagry (Fig. 1). Thus, the areas between the estuary of North Dvina, the lower reaches of the River Mezen and the lower reaches of the River Pechora, together with the southern part of the Kanin peninsula, still remain unsurveyed. Among the shrews that we karyotyped we also did not find the Yuryuzan race.

Among hybrid zones, previously only the Kirillov-Petchora zone was known within the region under study (Shchipanov et al. 2008), and only 17 hybrid zones have been described in the common shrew overall (Searle & Wójcik 1998, Orlov et al. 2007, Bulatova et al. 2007, 2011, Polyakov et al. 2011, Orlov et al. 2012).

Here we provide a much more detailed appreciation of the ranges of the five races that we find, and describe further six hybrid zones, based on the discovery and description of F1 hybrids. These F1 hybrids are expected to produce three types of meiotic configuration: RIV configurations in Kirillov-Manturovo and Serov-Sok hybrids, RVI configurations in Kirillov-Petchora, Manturovo-Petchora, Manturovo-Sok and Petchora-Sok hybrids and RVIII configurations in Petchora-Serov hybrids. Previous studies have shown hybrids that are expected to form RIV and RVI configurations (Narain & Fredga 1997, Searle & Wójcik 1998, Banaszek et al. 2000, Orlov et al. 2012). Here for the first time we show hybrids that are expected to form RVIII configurations. Hybrids with small to medium ring configurations would not be expected to be as unfit as those that form long chain configurations (e.g. CIX-forming and CXI-forming hybrids recently described by Polyakov et al. 2011 and Bulatova et al. 2011), but nevertheless would be expected to suffer reduced hybrid fitness (Searle 1993). However, no substantial barriers to the gene flow were recorded in hybrid zones between certain chromosomal races of the common shrew (Horn et al. 2012).

The occurrence of the hybrids clearly represents some of the boundaries of the five races under consideration. We describe our total appreciation of the distributions of each of these races below.

Locality 1 is the type locality of the Kirillov race (Orlov & Kozlovsky 2002), which has also been reported from localities 2–4 (Orlov et al. 2004, Fig. 1 and Table 2).

The type locality of the Petchora race (Fig. 1) is situated near the village of Ulyashevo (site 14) on the left bank of the River Pechora (Kozlovsky et al. 2000). This race is further known from localities 8, 12, and 15 on the right bank of the River Mezen, where it hybridises with the Kirillov race, and from localities 6 and 16 in the middle of the Timan Ridge (Shchipanov et al. 2008) (Fig. 2).

The Serov race was first described from locality 25, to the east of the Ural Mountains, and was considered Asian in distribution (Polyakov et al. 1997). But later the Serov race was recorded on the European side of the mountains, from the valleys of the River Berezovka of the Kama basin (site 28) and the River Nem of the Vychegda basin (site 29), on both banks of the River Pechora (site 30), on the European slope of the Ural Mountains (sites 31 and 32) and alongside the River Ilych from localities 33–35 (Shchipanov et al. 2008) (Figs. 1, 3 and Table 2). Locality 26 indicates the western limit of known distribution of the race at present (Shchipanov et al. 2005a, Bystrakova et al. 2007). The eastern border of the Serov race range is situated in Siberia, in Tyumen Region (Polyakov et al. 2000). This race and Serov-Novosibirsk F1 hybrids are also known from other localities in the Ural Mountains (sites 36, 37 and 37a) (Polyakov et al. 1997, 2000) and from locality 38 in the Orenburg region (Pavlova et al. 2006), which is the southern limit of the known range. A Serov-Yuryuzan F1 hybrid has been described from locality 39 in a city park of Yekaterinburg (Shchipanov et al. 2009b) (Fig. 1, Table 2).

Locality 40 on the left bank of the River Volga is the type locality of the Sok race (Polyakov et al. 2000). The most southern localities for the race (41 and 42) are known from the Saratov and Orenburg regions (Shchipanov et al. 2002, Bystrakova et al. 2003). The range of the race follows the left bank of the River Volga and crosses the River Kama (sites 43–48). The eastern locality for the Sok race (site 49) is known from the Bashkiria Republic (Polyakov et al. 2000). Localities of the neighbouring Yuryuzan race (sites 50–53) mark the possible south-eastern border of the Sok race. A large gap in chromosomal studies remains between the southern and the northern segments of the area of the Sok race (Fig. 1, Table 2). In the northern part of the range of the Sok race (Fig. 3), the most western record is from near the village of Ropcha (site 57) and near the village of Malaya Sluda (site 58) on the right bank of the River Vychegda. From here the race follows upstream along the right bank of the River Vychegda to the place where the River Nem flows into the River Vychegda (sites 59–61) (Shchipanov et al. 2008) (Table 2), except for the town of Ezhva where we found a Manturovo-Sok F1 hybrid on the left bank (site 62) (Figs. 1, 3 and Table 1).

The type site of the Manturovo race is at locality 64 in the south-western part of its subsequently described range (Bulatova et al. 2000). The distribution of the race in the south is known to be bounded by the left bank of the River Volga (site 65) (Fig. 1; Bystrakova et al. 2003). Locality 4, where individuals of both pure races, as well as Kirillov-Manturovo hybrids, occur together, marks the south-western limit of distribution of the Manturovo race (Orlov et al. 2007). The pure race is found in a north-eastern direction in localities 76 (Orlov et al. 2007), 66 and 67 (Bulatova et al. 2000, Bystrakova et al. 2003). The eastern border of the range of the race reaches the town of Syktyvkar (site 74) (Bulatova et al. 2000) and the village of Dan' (site 75) (Shchipanov et al. 2008) (Fig. 1, Table 2).

Barriers such as rivers (Mercer & Searle 1991), wet riverine meadow habitats (Fedyk et al. 1993), lakes (Bulatova et al. 2011), highlands (Jones & Searle 2003) or transitions between different habitats (Polyakov et al. 2000, 2003, 2011) have previously been described as the boundaries between chromosomal races of the common shrew, including hybrid zones. However, in north-eastern Russia, wetlands are patchily distributed and, therefore, can hardly form a continual barrier to the distribution of common shrews. Almost all the area under the study constitutes the mid-taiga biome, and only the Ural Mountains represent a significant elevation within the area, and then as the eastern border to the area under study. Rivers could potentially limit the distribution of the races. However, water may not be an absolute barrier to common shrews given that Hanski and colleagues demonstrated that immatures can migrate to small islets across a lake swimming 40–820 m (Hanski 1986, Hanski & Peltonen 1988, Peltonen & Hanski 1991, Hanski et al. 1991 and others). We did not find evidence that even the biggest rivers in north-eastern European Russia (over 500 m in width) limit the dispersal of populations. In particular, the Kirillov race crosses the River North Dvina (width 500–1300 m), the Manturovo race must have crossed either the North Dvina (900 m) or the Vychegda rivers (600 m) to achieve the northern parts of its range, and the Sok race crossed the River Kama, which is over 1000 m wide in its lower reaches (Fig. 1).

Moreover, in our study most contacts between the races in north-eastern Russia, either observed or expected, occur when races move alongside the rivers to meet each other. Thus, the majority of our localisations of hybrid individuals cannot be attributed to the barrier effect of riverine systems per se, though we usually found them next to rivers due to the local transport facilities. For example, at locality 17 the races meet each other moving along the same left bank of the River Mezen up (the Manturovo race) and down (the Petchora race) (Fig. 3). In fact, a riverine barrier obviously contributes to the occurrence of hybrids between the Kirillov and Petchora races, i.e. in all the three localities where hybrids were found, the pure races inhabited the opposite banks of the river (Fig. 2). Apparently, the record of the Manturovo-Sok hybrid (site 62) may represent an additional case of this kind, considering the fact that in this part of the River Vychegda, the Sok race was found only on the right bank and the Manturovo race on the left (Fig. 3). Only those four sites out of the 11 localities with the hybrid individuals could be attributed to the riverine barrier effect.

Contacts between the Kirillov and Manturovo, Manturovo and Sok, Sok and Yuryuzan, and Serov and Yuryuzan races may be expected in areas lacking distinct environmental barriers (Fig. 1). The Manturovo and Petchora races should meet each other somewhere within a loop of the River Mezen in its upper parts. This area is covered by homogeneous taiga free of significant altitudinal changes; there are no rivers and the terrain is featureless without any potential barriers for migration. The area between the southern localities of the Petchora race and the northern localities of the Sok race is also homogeneous (Fig. 3).

North-eastern Russia is a natural area of colonisation of the common shrew. The chromosomal races there may represent expansions from populations in glacial refugia, or populations of postglacial origin (Wójcik 1993, Polyakov et al. 2001, Orlov et al. 2007). These races are found in the area despite an absence of high elevations to act as geographic barriers. Major rivers may have been expected to separate the races, but our results indicate that they do not have a major role. Nor, given the homogeneity of habitat are there habitat transitions that may explain the boundaries of chromosomal races. It is clear that it is not possible to have a simplistic explanation of major environmental barriers to explain the manner in which chromosomal races form their natural limits. We plan to carry out further fine-scale studies to understand more fully the determinants of race distribution in north-eastern European Russia, which we believe to be a particularly fruitful area for such studies.

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. A.V. Bobretsov, I.F. Kuprianova, A.A. Kalinin, A.V. Kouptsov, T.B. Demidova, and O.N. Batova for their assistance in collecting shrews. We are thankful to Dr. Nina Bulatova for her valuable consultations in karyology. We appreciate the assistance of Prof. Joseph Merritt in preparing the first English version of manuscript. We thank Dr. Andrey Tchabovsky for his comprehensive and fruitful discussion on the structure of the manuscript and the English. We would like to thank also Prof. Jan Zima for his helpful advices on the manuscript. We are especially grateful to Prof. Jeremy Searle for valuable comments on this manuscript and the English. This work was supported by RFBR (08-04-00553, 12-04-00937, 12-04-31200) and President Grant for Russian Distinguished Young Scientists MK-2500.2011.4 (to S. Pavlova).

Literature

1.

Banaszek A., Fedyk S., Szałaj K.A. & Chętnicki W. 2000: A comparison of spermatogenesis in homozygotes, simple Robertsonian heterozygotes and complex heterozygotes of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.). Heredity 84: 570–577. Google Scholar

2.

Bilton D.T., Mirol P.M., Mascheretti S., Fredga K., Zima J. & Searle J.B. 1998: Mediterranean Europe as an area of endemism for small mammals rather than a source for northwards postglacial colonization. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1219–1226. Google Scholar

3.

Bulatova N., Jones R.M., White T.A., Shchipanov N.A., Pavlova S.V. & Searle J.B. 2011: Natural hybridization between extremely divergent chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Soricidae, Soricomorpha): hybrid zone in European Russia. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 573–586. Google Scholar

4.

Bulatova N., Searle J.B., Bystrakova N.V., Nadjafova R.S., Shchipanov N.A. & Orlov V.N. 2000: The diversity of chromosome races in Sorex araneus from European Russia. Acta Theriol. 45: 33–46. Google Scholar

5.

Bulatova N., Searle J.B., Nadjafova R.S., Pavlova S.V. & Bystrakova N.V. 2009: Field protocols for the genomic era. Comp. Cytogenet. 3: 57–62. Google Scholar

6.

Bulatova N., Shchipanov N.A. & Searle J.B. 2007: The Seliger - Moscow hybrid zone between chromosome races of common shrews - an initial description. Russ. J. Theriol. 6: 111–116. Google Scholar

7.

Bystrakova N.V., Bulatova N., Kovalskaya Y., Shchipanov N.A., Kalinin A.A., Nadjafova R.S. & Searle J.B. 2003: Geographical limits of chromosomal races of common shrew Sorex araneus L. in the Middle Volga (East European Russia). Mammalia 67: 187–191. Google Scholar

8.

Bystrakova N.V., Shchipanov N.A., Bulatova N., Sheftel B., Nadjafova R., Pavlova S.V., Demidova T., Bobretsov A., Aleksandrov D., Kalinin A., Kouptsov A., Volkova A., Oleinichenko V. & Searle J.B. 2007: New data on the geographic distribution of chromosome races of Sorex araneus (Soricidae, Eulipotyphla) in European Russia. Russ. J. Theriol. 6: 105–109. Google Scholar

9.

Fedyk S., Zajkowska M. & Chętnicki W. 1993: Study of a contact zone between two chromosomally monomorphic races of Sorex araneus L. (common shrew). Heredity 71: 221–226. Google Scholar

10.

Ford C.E. & Hamerton J.L. 1956: A colchicine, hypotonic citrate, squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technol. 31: 247–251. Google Scholar

11.

Fredga K. 1996: A new chromosome race of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in the Kanin peninsula, NW Russia. Hereditas 125: 247–248. Google Scholar

12.

Fredga K. 2007: Reconstruction of the postglacial colonization of Sorex araneus into northern Scandinavia based on karyotype studies, and the subdivision of the Abisko race into three. Russ. J. Theriol. 6: 85–96. Google Scholar

13.

Gabriel S.I., Jóhannesdóttir F., Jones E.P. & Searle J.B. 2010: Colonization, mouse-style. BMC Biology 8: 131. Google Scholar

14.

Halkka L., Kaikusalo A. & Vakula N. 1994: Revision of Sorex araneus L. chromosome nomenclature, and race N new to Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31: 283–288. Google Scholar

15.

Halkka L., Söderlund V., Skaren U. & Heikkila J. 1987: Chromosomal polymorphism and racial evolution of Sorex araneus L. in Finland. Hereditas 106: 257–275. Google Scholar

16.

Hanski I. 1986: Population dynamics of shrews on small islands accord with the equilibrium model. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 28: 23–36. Google Scholar

17.

Hanski I. & Peltonen A. 1988: Island colonization and peninsulas. Oikos 51: 105–106. Google Scholar

18.

Hanski I., Peltonen A. & Kaski L. 1991: Natal dispersal and social dominance in the common shrew Sorex araneus. Oikos 62: 48–58. Google Scholar

19.

Hausser J., Fedyk S., Fredga K., Searle J.B., Volobouev V., Wójcik J. & Zima J. 1994: Definition and nomenclature of chromosome races of Sorex araneus. Folia Zool. 43: 1–9. Google Scholar

20.

Hewitt G.M. 1999: Post-glacial colonization of European biota. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68: 87–112. Google Scholar

21.

Hewitt G.M. 2000: The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907–913. Google Scholar

22.

Horn A., Basset P., Yannic G., Banaszek A., Borodin P.M., Bulatova N.S., Jadwiszczak K., Jones R.M., Polyakov A.V., Ratkiewicz M., Searle J.B., Shchipanov N.A., Zima J. & Hausser J. 2012: Chromosomal rearrangements do not seem to affect the gene flow in hybrid zones between karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Evolution 66: 882–889. Google Scholar

23.

Jones R.M. & Searle J.B. 2003: Mapping the course of the Oxford-Hermitage chromosomal hybrid zone in the common shrew Sorex araneus - a GIS approach. Mammalia 67: 193–200. Google Scholar

24.

Kozlovsky A., Orlov V., Okulova N., Kovalskaya Y. & Searle J.B. 2000: Chromosome studies on common shrew from northern and central parts of European Russia. Acta Theriol. 45: 27–31. Google Scholar

25.

Král B. & Radjabli S. 1974: Banding patterns and Robertsonian fusion in the western Siberian population of Sorex araneus (Insectivora, Soricidae). Zool. listy 23: 217–227. Google Scholar

26.

Mercer S.J. & Searle J.B. 1991: Preliminary analysis of a contact zone between karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in Scotland. Mém. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 19: 73–78. Google Scholar

27.

Narain Y. & Fredga K. 1997: Meiosis and fertility in common shrews, Sorex araneus, from a chromosomal hybrid zone in central Sweden. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 78: 253–259. Google Scholar

28.

Orlov V.N., Borisov Yu.M., Cherepanova E.V., Grigor'eva O.O., Shestak A.G. & Sycheva V.B. 2012: Narrow hybrid zone between Moscow and West Dvina chromosomal races and specific features of population isolation in common shrew Sorex araneus (Mammalia). Russ. J. Genet. 48: 70–78. Google Scholar

29.

Orlov V.N., Bulatova N., Kozlovsky A.I. & Balakirev A.E. 2004: Hierarchy in intraspecies taxa in the common shrew, Sorex araneus (Insectivora), and taxonomic structure of species in mammals. Zool. Zh. 83:199–212. (in Russian with English summary)  Google Scholar

30.

Orlov V.N. & Kozlovsky A.I. 2002: The role of glacial epochs in the formation of chromosomal polymorphism in the common shrew Sorex araneus L. (Insectivora, Mammalia). Doklady Biological Sciences 386: 462–465. Google Scholar

31.

Orlov V.N., Kozlovsky A.I., Okulova N.M. & Balakirev A.E. 2007: Postglacial recolonisation of European Russia by the common shrew Sorex araneus. Russ. J. Theriol. 6: 97–104. Google Scholar

32.

Pavlova S.V. 2010: A distinct chromosome race of the common shrew (Sorex araneus Linnaeus, 1758) within the Arctic Circle in European Russia. Comp. Cytogenet. 4: 73–78. Google Scholar

33.

Pavlova S.V. & Bulatova N. 2010: Identification of a novel WART-like rearrangement in complex heterozygotes in an interracial hybrid zone of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. Russ. J. Genet. 46: 1125–1126. Google Scholar

34.

Pavlova S.V., Bystrakova N.V., Bulatova N., Nadjafova R.S. & Polyakov A.V. 2006: The cadastre of chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. (in Russia). Biogeography 13: 42–59. (in Russian with English summary)  Google Scholar

35.

Peltonen A. & Hanski I. 1991: Patterns of islands occupancy explained by colonization and extinction rates in three species of shrews. Ecology 72: 1698–1708. Google Scholar

36.

Piálek J., Hauffe H. & Searle J.B. 2005: Chromosomal variation in the house mouse. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84: 535–563. Google Scholar

37.

Polyakov A.V., Borodin P.M., Lukáčová L., Searle J.B. & Zima J. 1997: The hypothetical Old-Northern chromosome race of Sorex araneus found in the Ural Mts. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 34: 139–142. Google Scholar

38.

Polyakov A.V., Panov V.V., Ladygina T.Yu., Bochkarev M.N., Rodionova M.I. & Borodin P.M. 2001: Chromosome evolution of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. in postglacial time in the South Ural and Siberia. Russ. J. Genet. 37: 448–455. Google Scholar

39.

Polyakov A.V., Volobouev V.T., Aniskin V.M., Zima J., Searle J.B. & Borodin P.M. 2003: Altitudinal partitioning of two chromosome races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) from western Siberia. Mammalia 67: 201–207. Google Scholar

40.

Polyakov A.V., White T.A., Jones R.M., Borodin P.M. & Searle J.B. 2011: Natural hybridisation between extremely divergent chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Soricidae, Soricomorpha): hybrid zone in Siberia. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 1393–1402. Google Scholar

41.

Polyakov A.V., Zima J., Searle J.B., Borodin P.M. & Ladygina T.Yu. 2000: Chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus in the Ural Mts: a link between Siberia and Scandinavia? Acta Theriol. 45: 19–26. Google Scholar

42.

Ratkiewicz M., Banaszek A., Jadwiszczak K.A., Chętnicki W. & Fedyk S. 2003: Genetic diversity, stability of population structure and barriers to gene flow in a hybrid zone between two Sorex araneus chromosome races. Mammalia 67: 275–284. Google Scholar

43.

Searle J.B. 1993: Chromosomal hybrid zones in eutherian mammals. In: Harrison R.G. (ed.), Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press , New York, Oxford : 309–353. Google Scholar

44.

Searle J.B., Fedyk S., Fredga K., Hausser J. & Volobouev V.T. 1991: Nomenclature for the chromosomes of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Mém. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 19: 13–22. Google Scholar

45.

Searle J.B. & Wójcik J.M. 1998: Chromosomal evolution: the case of Sorex araneus. Survey of hybrid zones. In: Wójcik J.M. & Wolsan M. (eds.), Evolution of shrews. Mammal Research Institute Polish Acad. Sci., Białowieża : 243–253. Google Scholar

46.

Shchipanov N.A. 1986: Ecological aspects of lesser white-toothed shrew (Crocidura suaveolens). Zool. Zh. 66: 1051-1060. (in Russian)  Google Scholar

47.

Shchipanov N.A., Bobretsov A.V., Pavlova S.V. & Demidova T.B. 2009a: Inhabited areas and new hybrid zones of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.) at the European north-eastern part of Russia. In: Proceedings of International Conference “Problems of animal study and protection in the North”. Komi Science Centre UrB RAS , Syktyvkar : 142–144. (in Russian)  Google Scholar

48.

Shchipanov N.A., Bulatova N. & Kalinin A.A. 2005a: Ural chromosomal Serov race of common shrew Sorex araneus L. (Insectivora, Mammalia) that inhabits polydominant deep coniferous taiga in the north of European Russia. Doklady Biological Sciences 404: 360–363. Google Scholar

49.

Shchipanov N.A., Bulatova N. & Oparin M. 2002: A population of the common shrew Sorex araneus L. (Insectivora, Mammalia) of the Sok race inhabiting a patch of forest at the southern boundary of the species range. Doklady Biological Sciences 386: 466–468. Google Scholar

50.

Shchipanov N.A., Bulatova N., Demidova T.B. & Bobretsov A.V. 2008: Chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.) inhabiting Northeastern European Russia: do physical obstacles restrict their distribution? Doklady Biological Sciences 422: 348–351. Google Scholar

51.

Shchipanov N.A., Bulatova N., Pavlova S.V. & Shchipanov A.N. 2009b: The common shrew (Sorex araneus) as a model for ecological and evolutionary studies. Zool. Zh. 88: 975–989. (in Russian with English summary)  Google Scholar

52.

Shchipanov N.A., Kalinin A.A., Oleinichenko V.Y., Aleksandrov D.Yu. & Kuptsov A.V. 2005b: Population ecology of red-toothed shrews Sorex araneus, S. caecutiens, S. minutus and S. isodon, in Central Russia. In: Merritt J., Churchfield S., Hutterer R. & Sheftel B.I. (eds.), Advances in the biology of shrews II. Special publication of the International Society of Shrew Biology , New York : 201–216. Google Scholar

53.

Szałaj K.A., Fedyk S., Banaszek A., Chętnicki W. & Ratkiewicz M. 1996: A hybrid zone between two chromosome races of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in eastern Poland: preliminary results. Hereditas 125: 169–176. Google Scholar

54.

Taskaev A.I. 2006: Virgin forests of Komi: the UNESCO world cultural and natural heritage site. Publication Centre “Design, information, cartography” , MoscowGoogle Scholar

55.

White T.A., Bordewich M. & Searle J.B. 2010: A network approach to study karyotypic evolution: the chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) as model systems. Syst. Biol. 59: 262–276. Google Scholar

56.

Wójcik J.M. 1993: Chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus in Poland: a model of karyotype evolution. Acta Theriol. 38: 315–338. Google Scholar

57.

Wójcik J.M., Borodin P.M., Fedyk S., Fredga K., Hausser J., Mishta A., Orlov V.N., Searle J.B., Volobouev V.T. & Zima J. 2003: The list of chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus (updated 2002). Mammalia 67: 169–179. Google Scholar
Nikolay A. Shchipanov and Svetlana V. Pa vlova "Contact zones and ranges of chromosomal races of the common Shrew, Sorex araneus, in north-eastern European Russia," Folia Zoologica 62(1), 24-35, (1 March 2013). https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v62.i1.a4.2013
Received: 24 May 2012; Accepted: 1 June 2012; Published: 1 March 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top