Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2013 Genetic evidence of unisexual reproduction in the Moroccan hexaploid barbel Labeobarbus fritschi
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The hexaploid barbel population of the species Labeobarbus fritschi which lives in the Allal El Fassi dam reservoir in the north of Morocco showed an absence of males among a sample of 597 individuals analyzed in a first survey and among the 39 fish analyzed in this study. A possible explanation is that this population may be composed of females only and that they reproduce either by gynogenesis or hybridogenesis, two processes triggered by hybridization with a sexually incompatible species (possibly the sympatric barbel Luciobarbus setivimensis in this case). We used molecular markers to collect any information that could explain the phenomenon. To do this, numerous nuclear loci were screened (more than 50) in search of polymorphism. Genetic diversity was low as a possible consequence of clonal reproduction: only three allozymic and two intronic loci presented a sufficient level of polymorphism to be exploited. The existence of several copies of the same multilocus genotypes (1/3 of the fish) — with some showing a significant probability of not being derived from sexual reproduction — provided evidence of unisexual reproduction. Deviations from panmixia as well as linkage equilibrium were also observed. Although preliminary, the data supports the hypothesis of the unisexual reproduction of females by way of gynogenesis rather than hybridogenesis.

Introduction

The genus Barbus sensu lato (Cuvier & Cloquet, 1816) belongs to the family Cyprinidae, composed of more than 800 species (Howes 1987). This genus, in its sensu lato (s.l.) acceptation, gathers taxa from Asia, Europe and Africa; it is only diagnosed as possessing two pairs of barbels, with several exceptions (one pair or no barbels).

In this enormous aggregation (Myers 1960), recent taxonomic improvements based on molecular/ cytogenetic data made it possible to identify large ploidy lineages already considered as distinct genera (Berrebi 1995, Berrebi et al. 1996, Skelton 2002, Berrebi & Tsigenopoulos 2002, 2003, Berrebi et al. 2013).

Labeobarbus fritschi (Günther, 1874) is a hexaploid barbel (El Gharbi 1994, Machordom & Doadrio 2001). Since 1996, the subgenus Labeobarbus has become a genus. It is widespread in Africa (Golubtsov & Krysanov 1993, Berrebi et al. 1996, Skelton 2002), particularly in Morocco (Machordom & Doadrio 2001) and in the Middle East (Durand et al. 2002, Tsigenopoulos et al. 2002). L. fritschi lives, among others, in the Allal El Fassi dam lake (Morocco), in the River Zerouka, a tributary of the River Sebu, north of Rabat (Bouhbouh 2002) where it accounts for most of the ichthyofauna with another tetraploid barbel, Luciobarbus setivimensis (Valencia, 1842).

Bouhbouh (2002) reported that samples of L. fritschi caught in this dam lake included only females (597 females from 597 fish sampled). The absence of males may be explained by two assumptions: (i) the males of this species were absent from the fishing sites since the barbel has a tendency to migrate, (ii) it is a monosex population consisting only of females and the reproductive process behind this phenomenon must be elucidated.

Teleost fish can develop different modes of reproduction including various forms of unisexual reproductions. Several mechanisms were described as selffecundation in some hermaphrodites, or gynogenesis and hybridogenesis in unisexual females of some populations (Chevassus 1998, Baroiller & Guiguen 2001, Gui & Zhou 2010, Collares-Pereira et al. 2013). Based on the genetic analysis of barbel using nuclear molecular markers, the objective of this study is to understand the relevance of each one of the two hypotheses: differential migrations between the sexes, or a unisexual population reproducing either by gynogenesis or hybridogenesis.

Material and Methods

Thirty-nine individuals of the species L. fritschi were collected in February 2002 using gillnets in the Allal El Fassi reservoir. The fish were frozen at -20 °C immediately after capture and transported to the laboratory in Montpellier, France. The sex of each of the 39 fish was verified by observation of gonads with a microscope after dissection. The molecular markers analyzed were of two types: allozymes and introns (EPIC — Exon Primed Intron-Crossing).

Allozymes

The enzyme extraction was performed on muscle and liver tissue of each fish according to the protocols described by Pasteur et al. (1987). The desired enzyme loci were highlighted by colour-adapted protocols by Berrebi et al. (1993, 1995) and Tsigenopoulos et al. (1999). Ten enzyme systems (IDH, LDH, PGI, MDH, 6PGD, AAT, GDA, AK and PGM) and the soluble muscle proteins (PT), corresponding to 25 presumptive loci, were tested. Table 1a presents details of the retained loci and buffers used (nomenclature according to Shaklee et al. 1990).

Introns

DNA was extracted according to the classical phenol/ chloroform protocol (Sambrook et al. 1989). EPICPCR used primers complementary to exon sequences flanking introns. Exon sequences are mostly conserved among the species, providing universal priming zones which hold a practical interest (Atarhouch et al. 2003). A total of 27 primer pairs were tested in this study. Table 1 lists the characteristics of the retained loci for the analysis. PCR reactions were performed using an Eppendorf Mastercycler in a volume of 10 µL for each individual, containing 1 µL of 10X buffer (Promega), 2.5 mM MgCl 2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP (Invitrogen), 0.5 µM of each of the two primers, one of which is labeled with a fluorochrome (Cy3, Cy5 or Fuorescein, MWG-Biotech), 0.3 U of Taq polymerase (Sigma) and 1 µL of DNA template at about 150 µg/mL.

Table 1.

Marker descriptions.

a) Allozymic loci: tissue of extraction, electrophoretic buffers and staining solution compositions.

t01_257.gif

The PCR program included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, then 35 cycles consisting of denaturation for 1 min, binding of the primers (annealing) at the temperature specific to each locus (see Table 1b) for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min 20 sec; the program ended with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

The PCR products were then subjected to electrophoresis on acrylamide denaturing (urea) 8 % gel. This gel was read by a Hitachi FMBIO II scanner. The FMBIO Analysis 8.0 software can accurately measure allele sizes in number of base pairs (bp).

Statistical analyses

The data matrix was statistically processed involving three steps:

1) Calculation of the parameters commonly used in population genetics (allele frequencies, heterozygosity).

2) Calculation of Wright's fixation indices such as Fis (checking panmixia) by the estimator f of Weir & Cockerham (1984) and linkage disequilibrium (Black & Krafsur 1985). The statistical significance of these parameters was estimated by resampling permutations tests (5000 permutations). The Genetix software (Belkhir et al. 1998) was used for these first two steps. 3) The clonality of genotypes was tested using the Geneclone software (Arnaud-Haond & Belkhir 2007). This software established the probability of existence for each multilocus genotype taking into account the Fis of the population analyzed, i.e. a deviation from panmixia as described by Young et al. (2002). Next, the probability that n repetitions of the same genotype can occur in the population by n independent events of sexual reproduction was estimated (psex; Tibayrenc et al. 1990, Parks & Werth 1993, Arnaud-Haond et al. 2005). If psex < 0.05, repeated genotypes have a significant probability of being propagated by unisexual reproduction.

Table 2.

Allelic frequencies and heterozygosities of the five loci analyzed. Ho = observed heterozygosity, He = expected heterozygosity.

t02_257.gif

Results

Dissection and observation under a binocular microscope of a gonad for each of the 39 fish revealed that they were all females, the gonads containing oocytes that were easily recognizable, at different stages of maturity between individuals.

Among the 10 enzymatic systems tested, 5 showed interpretable zymograms: AK, PGI, MDH, PGM and PT despite hexaploidy, for a total of 8 loci. The loci AK*, MDH-1* and MDH-2* were monomorphic in the sample and uninformative. The loci PT* and PGM* showed a presence/absence polymorphism not used for our demonstration.

Only three loci of the PGI system (Phospho-Glucoisomerase) were polymorphic and usable for our purpose: the loci PGI-2* and PGI-3* migrated to the cathode while PGI-4* migrated to the anode.

Among the twenty-seven intronic systems tested, only two gave usable results with a measurable length polymorphism: the PR and Mlc2a systems. Each had only a single polymorphic locus, in both cases with two alleles. Other systems tested were either unreadable due to overlapping bands (12) or monomorphic (13). Enzymes and introns data were gathered in a single matrix which was subjected to the statistical analyzes described above.

1) Table 2 gives the allelic frequencies of enzyme loci and introns, as well as the partial estimated (considering only the polymorphic loci) and observed heterozygosities.

2) The estimate of Fis produces a negative value (-0.328) that is highly significant (p < 0.001). This negative value indicates an excess of heterozygotes (see Table 2) and thus a deviation from Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the barbel population. Similarly, the test of linkage disequilibrium between the four loci shows that the pairs of loci PGI-2*/ Mlc2a and PGI-4*/RP were significantly correlated (p < 0.001).

3) The test of clonality was applied to the data set. A group of multi-locus genotypes (those of individuals h4, h14, h25 and h36, see Appendix) showed a significant probability (psex < 0.03) of not having been generated by sexual reproduction and therefore generated by clonal reproduction.

Discussion

Polyploidy compensates low polymorphism

Polyploidy is considered to confer more tolerance to ecological variations because the duplication of their genes provides metabolic flexibility similar to a permanent high genomic heterozygosity (Uyeno & Smith 1972, Otto & Whitton 2000, Jiang et al. 2013). The Labeobarbus fritschi Moroccan populations showed low polymorphism and thus low heterozygosity; however their hexaploidy may compensate this lack. Technically speaking, hexaploidy provoked a very low level of usable markers in our study due to complex multiple bands patterns at all nuclear markers.

El Gharbi (1994) analyzed a population of L. fritschi from the River Zerouka in her work on the phylogeny of the genus Barbus s.l. complex in North Africa. Her sample came from a scientific station located downstream of the Allal El Fassi dam lake analyzed in this study. It showed that the downstream population was in HWE. This author does not seem to have estimated the sex ratio of this river population.

In this 1994 study, only two allozyme loci were polymorphic (AK-2* and PGI-4*) out of the 15 analyzed in total. In this study, five loci were evidenced as polymorphic among 8 allozymic and 15 intronic interpretable markers. The polymorphic loci analyzed in the two studies were similarly scarce (respectively 2/15 and 5/23).

Sex migration dimorphism hypothesis

In agreement with the observations of Bouhbouh (2002), examination of the gonads of 39 barbel fish of 2002 from the dam lake revealed that they were all females. How can this population reproduce with only females in the lake? The two relevant hypotheses that may explain this phenomenon are: migration of male fish with seasonal meetings with females, or unisexual reproduction.

The absence of males as remarked by Bouhbouh (2002) was observed after many gillnet fishing expeditions and during all seasons between 2000 and 2001. Our own observations on a sample of 2002 are consistent with this result. If the meeting of the two sexes was seasonal, multiple fishing opportunities should have revealed some males. It is therefore very likely that no male is living in the lake. This simple observation leads us to consider unisexual reproduction as the best hypothesis.

Unisexual reproduction hypothesis

The data analysis resulted in some important features pointing in favour of the unisexual reproduction hypothesis. Deviations from HWE are important population features. Firstly, the Fis estimate showed that there was a very significant excess of heterozygotes while most panmictic deviations described in natural populations showed a deficit in heterozygotes, often due to a Walhund effect (Aurelle et al. 2002). Secondly, we found two pairs of loci (PGI-2*/Mlc2a and PGI- 4*/RP) that were statistically associated (p < 0.001). Analysis of genotypes showed that two thirds of the specimens possessed the same genotype at the five loci studied. Given the low polymorphism at our disposal, it is questionable whether such sets of identical genotypes can be observed in fish populations that reproduce sexually. The test of clonality (Geneclone) showed that at least one multilocus genotype, repeated four times (four individuals, n°4, 14, 25 and 36, bearing the letter h in the Appendix), had a significant probability of not being propagated by sexual reproduction processes. All these results lead us to the unisexual reproduction hypothesis.

Gynogenesis

Unisexual female populations are known in fish, often after episodes of hybridization between species of the same genus (see review in Chevassus 1998). The cases of the genera Poecilia and Poeciliopsis illustrate two classical patterns of female monosex populations. Poecilia formosa lives in unisexual female populations, reproducing by gynogenesis (premeiotic endomitosis) with the production of diploid eggs. The sperm of another species is only used to trigger the embryonic development without participating in the genome of the future embryo as evidenced in several studies (Hubbs & Hubbs 1932, Turner et al. 1980, Castelli 1994, Ryan et al. 1996, Yang et al. 2001).

Reproduction by gynogenesis at the most maintains the initial heterozygosity (Schultz 1977, Bulger & Schultz 1979) but its reduction is expected. This mode of unisexual reproduction does not meet the Mendelian laws and causes major deviations from HWE and statistical linkages among loci.

In the hybridogenesis case of the Poeciliopsis complex (Moore & McKay 1971, Chevassus 1998), unisexual female populations of P. monacha coexist with bisexual sympatric populations (P. lucida and P. occidentalis). Thus, two forms of unisexual diploid female populations result from the hybridization between females of P. monacha and males of each of the two sympatric bisexual species. In these diploid females, meiosis is not recombinant but reductional and hemiclonal (hybridogenesis), allowing the genome of the mother to be transmitted without recombination: the eggs contain only the maternal genome (P. monacha), the paternal genome brought by the males of P. lucida or P. occidentalis participating in the somatic line only (Schultz 1980). Hemiclonal hybridogenesis maintains their hybrid status (Schultz 1977, Bulger & Schultz 1979), leading to highly polymorphic populations.

In this Labeobarbus monosex population, the trigging role of sympatric and even syntopic males of Luciobarbus setivimensis can be expected since favorable spawning areas in the dam lake are probably limited, leading to accidental gametes contacts and since Luciobarbus genus is a distant lineage (Labeobarbus is an African hexaploid lineage while Luciobarbus is a North African and European tetraploid one). According to the limited information produced here for the Labeobarbus case, gynogenesis is more probable than hybridogenesis which should follow fecondation between very different lineages (tetraploid and hexaploid of a distinct origin, Tsigenopoulos et al. 2002).

Limited nuclear genetic data is mainly due to the hexaploid nature of the Labeobarbus genus (Tsigenopoulos et al. 2002). Demonstrating the mechanism of unisexual reproduction occurring in the lake requires much more information than that produced for this preliminary study. Microsatellites and introns are traditionally the main markers used in this kind of research. Despite the high number of intron system runs (15), only two proved to be interpretable for this study. It is probable that microsatellites would add a more few markers, but genome scan methods will clearly be necessary (genome scan techniques as AFLP) to disentangle the process.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jean-François Baroiller for his help in elucidating the reproductive process, Sophie Arnaud- Haond for her contribution to statistical questions and Edwige Quillet for a time-consuming critical reading of a preliminary version of this manuscript.

Literature

1.

Arnaud-Haond S. & Belkhir K. 2007: GenClone: a computer program to analyse genotypic data, test for clonality and describe spatial clonal organization. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7: 15–17. Google Scholar

2.

Arnaud-Haond S., Alberto F., Procaccini G., Serrao E.A. & Duarte C.M. 2005: Assessing genetic diversity in clonal organisms: low diversity or low resolution? Combining power and cost-efficiency in selecting markers. J. Hered. 96: 1–8. Google Scholar

3.

Atarhouch T., Rami M., Cattaneo-Berrebi G., Ibanez C., Augros S., Boissin E., Dakkak A. & Berrebi P. 2003: New primers for EPIC amplification of intron sequences for fish and other vertebrate population genetic studies. BioTechniques 35: 676–682. Google Scholar

4.

Aurelle D., Cattaneo-Berrebi G. & Berrebi P. 2002: Natural and artificial secondary contact in brown trout (Salmo trutta, L.) in the French western Pyrenees assessed by allozymes and microsatellites. Heredity 89: 171–183. Google Scholar

5.

Baroiller J.-F. & Guiguen Y. 2001: Endocrine and environmental aspects of sex differentiation in gonochoristic fish. In: Scherer G. & Schmid M. (eds.), Genes and mechanisms in vertebrate sex determination. Birkhäuser Verlag , Basel-Switzerland : 177–201. Google Scholar

6.

Belkhir K., Borsa P., Goudet J., Chikhi L. & Bonhomme F. 1998: Genetix, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome et Populations, CNRS UPR 9060, Université Montpellier II , Montpellier, France .  http://www.univ-montp2.fr/~genetix/genetix.htm  Google Scholar

7.

Berrebi P. 1995: Speciation of the genus Barbus in the north Mediterranean basin: recent advances from biochemical genetics. Biol. Conserv. 72: 237–249. Google Scholar

8.

Berrebi P. & Tsigenopoulos C. 2002: Contribution des séquences mitochondriales à l'éclatement phylogénétique du genre polyploide Barbus (Téléostéens Cyprinidés). Implications biogéographiques. Biosystema 20: 49–56. Google Scholar

9.

Berrebi P. & Tsigenopoulos C. 2003: Phylogenetic organisation of the genus Barbus sensu stricto - a synthesis on the molecular markers data. In: Banarescu P. (ed.), Freshwater fishes of Europe - Cyprinidae. Aula-Verlag , Wiebelsheim : 11–22. Google Scholar

10.

Berrebi P., Cattaneo-Berrebi G. & Le Brun N. 1993: Natural hybridization of two species of tetraploid barbels: Barbus meridionalis and B. barbus (Osteichtyes, Cyprinidae) in southern France. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48: 319–333. Google Scholar

11.

Berrebi P., Chenuil A., Kotlík P., Machordom A. & Tsigenopoulos C.S. 2013: Disentangling the evolutionary history of the genus Barbus sensu lato, a twenty years adventure. In: Alves J. (ed.), Professor Carlos Almaça (1934–2010) - Estado da Arte em Áreas Cientificas que Desenvolveu. Museu Nacional de Historia Natural e da Ciencia , LisboaGoogle Scholar

12.

Berrebi P., Kottelat M., Skelton P. & Ráb P. 1996: Systematics of Barbus: state of the art and heuristic comments. Folia Zool. 45: 5–12. Google Scholar

13.

Berrebi P., Kraiem M.M., Doadrio I., El Gharbi S. & Cattaneo-Berrebi G. 1995: Ecological and genetic differenciation of Barbus callensis populations in Tunisia. J. Fish Biol. 47: 850–864. Google Scholar

14.

Black W.C. & Krafsur E.S. 1985: A FORTRAN program for the calculation and analysis of two-locus linkage disequilibrium coefficients. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70: 491–496. Google Scholar

15.

Bouhbouh S. 2002: Bio-écologie de Barbus callensis (Valencienne 1842) et Barbus fritschi (Günther 1874) au niveau du réservoir Allal El Fassi (Maroc). Thèse de la Faculté des Sciences Dhar El Mehraz , Fez, MarocGoogle Scholar

16.

Bulger A.J. & Schultz R.J. 1979: Heterosis and interclonal variation in thermal tolerance in unisexual fishes. Evolution 33: 848–859. Google Scholar

17.

Castelli M. 1994: Study on sex determination in the common barbel (Barbus barbus L.) (Pisces, Cyprinidae) using gynogenesis. In: Beaumont A.R. (ed.), Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms. Chapman & Hall , London : 509–519. Google Scholar

18.

Chevassus B. 1998: Modification du phénotype sexuel et du mode de reproduction chez les poissons Salmonidés: inversion sexuelle hormonale, gynogenèse, hybridation interspécifique et polyploïdisation. Thèse de l'Université Paris XI-Orsay : 162. Google Scholar

19.

Chow S. & Takeyama H. 1998: Intron length variation observed in the creatine kinase and ribosomal protein genes of the swordfish Xiphias gladius. Fish. Sci. 64: 397–402. Google Scholar

20.

Collares-Pereira M.J., Matos I., Morgado-Santos M. & Coelho M.M. 2013: Natural pathways towards polyploidy in animals: the Squalius alburnoides fish complex as a model system to study genome size and genome reorganization in polyploids. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 140: 97–116. Google Scholar

21.

Durand J.-D., Tsigenopoulos C.S., Unlu E. & Berrebi P. 2002: Phylogeny and biogeography of the family Cyprinidae in the Middle East inferred from Cytochrome b DNA evolutionary significance of this region. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22: 91–100. Google Scholar

22.

El Gharbi S. 1994: Biosystématique, évolution et biogéographie dans les interactions hote-parasite le modèle Barbus (Cyprinidés) Dactylogyrus (Monogenea). Thèse d'Etat, Faculté des sciences de Rabat (Maroc)Google Scholar

23.

Golubtsov A.S. & Krysanov E.Y. 1993: Karyological study of some cyprinid species from Ethiopia. The ploidy differences between large and small Barbus of Africa. J. Fish Biol. 42: 445–455. Google Scholar

24.

Gui J.F. & Zhou L. 2010: Genetic basis and breeding application of clonal diversity and dual reproduction modes in polyploid Carassius auratus gibelio (review). Sci. China Life Sci. 53: 409–415. Google Scholar

25.

Howes G.J. 1987: The phylogenetic position of the Yugoslavian cyprinid fish genus Aulopyge Heckel, 1841, with an appraisal of the genus Barbus Cuvier & Cloquet, 1816, and the subfamily Cyprininae. B. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 52: 165–196. Google Scholar

26.

Hubbs C.L. & Hubbs L.C. 1932: Apparent parthenogenesis in nature, in a form of fish of hybrid origin. Science 76: 628–630. Google Scholar

27.

Jiang F.F., Wang Z.W., Zhou L., Jiang L., Zhang X.J., Apalikova O.V., Brykov V.A. & Gui J.F. 2013: High male incidence and evolutionary implications of triploid form in northeast Asia Carassius auratus complex. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 66: 350–359. Google Scholar

28.

Machordom A. & Doadrio I. 2001: Evidence of a Cenozoic Betic-Kabilian connection based on freshwater fish phylogeny (Luciobarbus, Cyprinidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18: 252–263. Google Scholar

29.

Moore W.S. & McKay F.E. 1971: Coexistence in unisexual-bisexual species complexes of Poeciliopsis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Ecology 52: 791–799. Google Scholar

30.

Myers G.S. 1960: Preface to any future classification of the cyprinid fishes of the genus Barbus. Stanford Ichthyol. Bull. 7: 212–215. Google Scholar

31.

Otto S.P. & Whitton J. 2000: Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34: 401–437. Google Scholar

32.

Parks J.C. & Werth C.R. 1993: A study of spatial features of clones in a population of bracken fern, Pteridium-Aquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 537–544. Google Scholar

33.

Pasteur N., Pasteur G., Bonhomme F., Catalan J. & Britton-Davidian J. 1987: Manuel de génétique par électrophorèse des protéines. Lavoisier , Paris : 217. Google Scholar

34.

Ryan M.J., Dries L.A., Batra P. & Hillis D.M. 1996: Male mate preferences in a gynogenetic species complex of Amazon mollies. Anim. Behav. 52: 1225–1236. Google Scholar

35.

Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F. & Maniatis T. 1989: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor , New YorkGoogle Scholar

36.

Schultz R.J. 1977: Evolution and ecology of unisexual fishes. Evol. Biol. 10: 277–331. Google Scholar

37.

Schultz R.J. 1980: Role of polyploidy in the evolution of fishes. In: Lewis W.H. (ed.), Polyploidy: biological relevance. Plenum Press , New York : 313–340. Google Scholar

38.

Shaklee J.B., Allendorf F.W., Morizot D.C. & Whitt G.S. 1990: Gene nomenclature for protein-coding loci in fish. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 119: 2–15. Google Scholar

39.

Skelton P. 2002: Changes to the scientific and common names of southern African freshwater fishes. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 27: 171–174. Google Scholar

40.

Tibayrenc M., Kjellberg F. & Ayala F. 1990: A clonal theory of parasitic protozoa: the population structures of Entamoeba, Giardia, Leishmania, Naegleria, Plasmodium, Trichomonas and Trypanosoma and their medical and taxonomical consequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 2414–2418. Google Scholar

41.

Tsigenopoulos C., Karakousis Y. & Berrebi P. 1999: The North Mediterranean Barbus lineage: phylogenetic hypotheses and taxonomic implications based on allozyme data. J. Fish Biol. 54: 267–286. Google Scholar

42.

Tsigenopoulos C.S., Ráb P., Naran D. & Berrebi P. 2002: Multiple origins of polyploidy in the phylogeny of southern Africans barbs (Cyprinidae) as inferred from mtDNA marks. Heredity 88: 466–473. Google Scholar

43.

Turner B.J., Brett B.-L.H., Rasch E.M. & Balsano J.S. 1980: Evolutionary genetics of a gynogenetic fish, Poecilia formosa, the Amazon molly. Evolution 34: 246–258. Google Scholar

44.

Uyeno T. & Smith G.R. 1972: Tetraploid origin of the karyotype of catostomid fishes. Science 175: 644–646. Google Scholar

45.

Weir B.S. & Cockerham C.C. 1984: Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370. Google Scholar

46.

Yang L., Yang S.T., Wei X.H. & Gui J.F. 2001: Genetic diversity among different clones of the gynogenetic silver crucian carp, Carassius auratus gibelio, revealed by transferrin and isozyme markers. Biochem. Genet. 39: 213–225. Google Scholar

47.

Young A.G., Hill J.H., Murray B.G. & Peakall R. 2002: Breeding system, genetic diversity and clonal structure in the sub-alpine forb Rutidosis leiolepis F. Muell. (Asteraceae). Biol. Conserv. 106: 71–78. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix

Appendix.

Genotypes of the 39 barbels analyzed at five polymorphic loci. Individuals sharing the same multiloci genotypes are indicated by the same letter in the first column.

tA01a_257.gif

tA01b_257.gif
Patrick Berrebi, Xavier Retif, and Saadia Bouhbouh "Genetic evidence of unisexual reproduction in the Moroccan hexaploid barbel Labeobarbus fritschi," Folia Zoologica 62(4), 257-263, (1 December 2013). https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v62.i4.a2.2013
Received: 7 September 2013; Accepted: 1 November 2013; Published: 1 December 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top