Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2011 Gestation Length, Mode of Delivery, and Neonatal Line-Thickness Variation
Author Affiliations +

The transition from an intra- to extra-uterine environment leaves its mark in deciduous teeth (and first permanent molars) as an accentuated enamel incremental ring called the neonatal line (NL). This prominent microfeature separates the enamel formed during intrauterine life from that formed after leaving the womb. However, while the physical structure of this scar is well known, the bases of its formation are still a matter of investigation. In particular, besides the influence of the birth-related abrupt environmental and dietary changes and the role played by physiological factors such as hypocalcaemia, a direct relationship between NL thickness variation and the physical was trauma implied by the birth dynamics, the Caesarean, and the operative modes are apparently associated with the thinnest and the thickest lines, respectively.

By using the histological record from a deciduous dental sample (exfoliated crowns) of 100 modern healthy school-aged children (47 males and 53 females) of reported birth histories (normal delivery mode: 55 cases; Caesarean: 40; operative: 5), we investigated the relationships between birth dynamics and NL thickness variation. The Tukey Honest Significant Difference method was used to test the differences between the means of the grouping levels.

The results of our histo-morphological investigation do not support the suggestion that Caesarean-born children display, on average, a thinner enamel scar compared to children associated to a normal delivery mode. Rather, our study points to the influence exerted by factors intimately related to gestational length variation on the degree of expression of the line.

© 2011 Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309
Clément Zanolli, Luca Bondioli, Franz Manni, Paola Rossi, and Roberto Macchiarelli "Gestation Length, Mode of Delivery, and Neonatal Line-Thickness Variation," Human Biology 83(6), 695-713, (1 December 2011).
Received: 15 September 2011; Accepted: 1 October 2011; Published: 1 December 2011

Get copyright permission
Back to Top