Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2006 Supplemental material to Babut el al.
Marc P. Babut, Hélène Delmas, Marc Bray, Claude Durrieu, Yves Perrodin, Jeanne Garric
Author Affiliations +

The development of relevant frameworks for assessing ecological risks posed by dredged material management does not only involve an appropriate selection of assessment and measurement endpoints but also requires a sound approach to both risk characterization and the associated uncertainty. A formal methodology addressing both aspects has been developed in France for freshwater sediment deposits in water. Both exposure and effects measurements are 1st transformed into scores or classes. As far as possible, class boundaries are based on existing knowledge or expertise. Benthic organism exposure is based on a ratio of the deposit area to the burrow pit area, whereas pelagic species exposure is based on the ratio of porewater volume to water column volume. The combination of exposure and effect scores yields risk scores, or classes, which are linked to management decisions. Uncertainty is assessed with respect to a set of 4 predetermined criteria for exposure (the strength of association with the assessment endpoint, spatial and temporal representativeness, and the use of standard methods) and 4 criteria for effects (strength of association, the distinction between effect and no effect, sensitivity, and the use of standard methods). This approach was applied to 8 sediments from French canals contaminated to varying degrees.

Marc P. Babut, Hélène Delmas, Marc Bray, Claude Durrieu, Yves Perrodin, and Jeanne Garric "Supplemental material to Babut el al.," Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2(4), (1 October 2006).[e47:CTRTAE]2.0.CO;2
Received: 11 April 2005; Accepted: 10 December 2005; Published: 1 October 2006

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top