Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2007 Field Studies in Pesticide Registration: Questioning the Answers
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The principal conclusion of a workshop in October 2005 at RIVM (Bilthoven, The Netherlands) on the assessment of field studies with pesticides for authorization is that the lack of a definition of acceptability of effects is recognized as a problem by all stakeholders: Industry, risk assessors, and regulators. Because of this lack of definition in the legislation, it is unclear what critical effect values should be assessed in field studies. Despite the extensive documentation on field study performance, the decision making is not based on justifiable scientific opinions or publicly shared values but on technical limitations of the test design instead. In the workshop, research was identified that should result in a scientific basis for value judgments applied in decision making.

Mark H. M. M. Montforts and Frank M. W. de Jong "Field Studies in Pesticide Registration: Questioning the Answers," Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 3(1), 150-153, (1 January 2007). https://doi.org/10.1897/1551-3793(2007)3[150:FSIPRQ]2.0.CO;2
Received: 1 February 2006; Accepted: 1 April 2006; Published: 1 January 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top