Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2018 Combination of morphological characters and DNA-barcoding confirms Problepsis cinerea (Butler, 1886) (Geometridae: Sterrhinae: Scopulini) as a new genus and species for the fauna of Iran
Shamsi Feizpour, Lida Fekrat, Hussein Sadeghi Namaghi, Dirk Stadie, Hossein Rajaei
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Problepsis cinerea is reported as a new genus and species for the fauna of Iran. The species is recorded based on two females, collected in South Iran. Identification was confirmed by morphological characters and barcoding data. Information on the morphology and diagnostic characters are given, in comparison with the similar species. Remarks on the habitat and biology are added. Distribution pattern of both P. ocellata and P. cinerea in the Middle East is mapped. Details of the scent scales (located on the male hind tibia) are studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and illustrated.

1 Introduction

The genus Problepsis Lederer, 1853 belongs to the tribe Scopulini and the subfamily Sterrhinae. Scoble (1999) and Scoble & Hausmann (2007) listed 50 species to the genus Problepsis. Stadie & Stadie (2016) increased this to 53 (regarding P. cinerea as a bona species and describing two new species: P. fiebigi and P. sihvoneni).

Most Problepsis species have been recorded from the old world, mainly from Ethiopian and Oriental regions (distributed from western Africa to India and towards Australia) (Sihvonen & Siljander 2005; Stadie & Stadie 2016). The members of this genus are oligophagous, feeding exclusively on species of the family Oleaceae (e.g. Olea and Ligustrum) (Reisser 1957, Hausmann 2004, Stadie & Stadie 2016).

The genus Problepsis is characterized by several synapomorphies, namely: discal spot ocellate round on forewing, and hind wing with polished shiny scales on the wings and single areole venation in most species (Sihvonen 2005); Male hind-tibia laterally flattened, longitudinally spoon-shaped, toward 1st tarsomer curved internally, covered with hair pencil (see Figs. 14, 15, 16) serving as scent organ (Holloway 1997); Male hind-tibia with shortened tarsomers, hairy pulvillus present, claws and arolium mostly absent (Sihvonen & Kaila 2003); sternum A8 characteristically modified (posterior part known as mappa, anterior margin is trilobed, see Figs. 9-c, 10-c). As other species of the tribe Scopulini (also some other species of the subfamilies Sterrhinae and Ennominae), the male hind tibia of Problepsis species, are characterized by the presence of a hair pencil (Sihvonen 2005). This hair pencil is associated with scent cells (androconia), regarded as scent scales, and plays a major role in courtship behavior (Birch & Poppy 1990, Kristensen 1999, Kristensen & Simonsen 2003, Sihvonen 2005, Skou et al. 2017, Hernández-Roldán et al. 2014). This hair pencil is considered as a replacement of tibial spurs on the hind leg (Sihvonen 2005). A close-up view of this structure is depicted in this paper (see results).

Male genitalia of Problepsis are characteristic by: uncus absent; socii setose, dors ally fused and looks like uncus (see Fig. 10a-2); ventral margin of tegumen dentate; valve deeply cleft into two dagger-form processes; juxta apically fused to the sacculus valva (Sihvonen 2005). Female genitalia with oval shaped corpus bursa; signum consists of separated tiny sclerotized spots, forming an ovoid patch (Figs. 11-13).

Problepsis cinerea was described by Butler (1886) (original combination Argyria cinerea) from Campbellpur (Pakistan). Prout (1938) downgraded this taxon to a local race of ocellata (Frivaldszky, 1845). Hausmann (1998) regarded this name as subspecies of ocellata. A combination of morphological comparative studies, morphometric analyses and DNA barcoding data, along with distribution pattern and habitat information convinced Stadie & Stadie (2016) to confirm this taxon as bona species.

Figs. 1-5.

Wing pattern and habitat. 1–3. Problepsis cinerea, 1. ♀ (Geno protected area, South Iran), 2. ♂ (North Pakistan), 3. ♀ (North Pakistan). 4–5. P. ocellata, 4. ♂ (Turkey), 5. ♀ (Turkey), a, upperside, b, under side, Scale-bar: 1 cm.

f01_47.jpg

The present paper reports Problepsis cinerea as a new genus and species for the fauna of Iran.

Abbreviations

BC

Barcoding Code;

g. prep.

genital preparation

Acronyms

Coll. Stadie

Private Collection Dirk Stadie

Coll. Fiebig

Private Collection Ralf Fiebig; NHMUK: Natural History Museum of London, U. K.

SMNK

State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe, Germany

SMNS

State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Germany

ZFMK

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany

ZSM

Bavarian State Museum of Zoology, Munich, Germany

Figs. 6–8.

Habitat of Problepsis cinerea in Geno protected area. 6-7. Olea europaea cuspidata, potentially natural host of P. cinerea in South Iran, 8. A view of Geno protected area, Bandar Abbas (Courtesy: Abdol-Reza Dehghani, Iran).

f06_47.jpg

2 Materials and Methods

Portable light traps (powered by 12-Volt batteries and 8-Watt black-light UVB tubes) were used to attract the specimens. Two females were captured at around 2 am. Adult moths were identified based on the most recent publication (Stadie & Stadie, 2016) and confirmed by the fourth author. Prior to the dissection, the adults were photographed using Olympus Digital Camera (E-3). For precise identifications, the genitalia of the specimens were dissected using a standard method (Robinson 1976). The genitalia were stained by Chlorazol-Black and mounted in Euparal. Genitalia slides were photographed using a Leica Microsystem (DFC-490). The morphology of hind tibia and its hair pencil were studied using Scanning Electron Microscopy (Zeiss SEM, Evo LS 15). For comparison of morphological characters, following specimens were used:

Problepsis cinerea: 2 ♀, Iran, Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Geno, 2128 m, 27°25‘02“N 56°10‘160“E, 30.04.2016, leg. S. Feizpour; g. prep. 371/2017, S. Feizpour; Barcode: SMNS_ Lep_000976, in SMNS. 1 ♂, Pakistan, Campbellpor, 40 miles from Rawal Pindee (Type), 84.162(9), 6.6.1986, g. prep. 10952; in BMNH; 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Pakistan, [NWFP], Drazinda tribal agency, N Suleiman Mts., 1700, 17.-21.8.2008, leg. V. Gurko; in RFPC; 1 ♂, W Pakistan, Swat, Kalam, 2000 m, 9.7.1969, leg. G. Ebert; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Afghanistan, Asmar, Kunartal, 900 m, 3.4.1953, leg. J. Klapperich, ex coll. Josef Froitzheim & Johann(es) Klapperich, DS 48, 77 & 80/2012; 1 ♂, 2 ♂, Afghanistan, Nuristan, 25 km N v. Barikot, 1800, 12.-17.7.1963, leg. Kasy & Vartian, ex coll. Hans Reisser, g. prep. DS 45/2012; 1 ♀, Afghanistan, Nuristan, Bashgultal, 1200 m 3.5.1953 g. prep. DS 46/2012 Dirk Stadie; [1 ♀] same data, 1150 m, 1.5.1953, ex coll. Johann(es) Klapperich, g. prep. DS 47/2012; 1 ♂, same data, 1100 m, 6.4.1953, g. preps. DS 79 & 78/2012; all in SMNK; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, NO-Pakistan, Murree, 1700 m, 18.-19.7.1975, leg. W. Thomas; 2 ♂, 1 ♀, Pakistan, SW Himalaya, Indus_Kuhistan, Kaghan-Tal, Shinu, 17-2200 m, 7.8.-8.8.1977, leg. de Freina, g. preps. 374 & 375/2017, S. Feizpour; all in SMNS; 1 ♂, Pakistan, Kohistan, Swat prov., Madyan, 1350 m, 35°14′N, 72°28′E, 30.6.1992, leg. Z. Weldenhoffer, museum A. Koeing, Eing. Nr. ex coll. 93/381; 1 ♂, same data, Miandam, 1800 m, 35°10′N, 72°32′E, 25.6,-5.7.1992; all in ZFMK; 2 ♂, 4 ♀, Pakistan, Kohistan, Industal, Pattan, 1050 m, 35°08′N, 72°56′E, 30.9.-7.10.1988, leg. Weigert, g. preps. DS 61, 63, 64, 84 & 85/2012; 2 ♀, Pakistan, Hazara, Balakot, 900-1100 m, 3.-7.6.1983, leg. Eckweiler, g. prep. DS 62/2012; 1 ♂, West Pakistan, Salt Range, Chingi, 4.3.1956, leg. Ch. Lindemann, g. prep. DS 83/2012; 1 ♀, Pakistan, N.W.F. prov. Salt Range, 17 km N Quaidabad, 32°24′N, 72°00′E, 350 m, 12.10.1988, leg. Weigert, g. prep. DS 82/2012; all in ZSM; 1 ♂, 2 ♀, Oman, Sultant Oman Jebel Akhdar, Birkat Al Sharaf, 1930, 23°09′59.5″, 57°25′36″, 30.7.2010 LF/6.-7.10.2011 LF, Lehmann, Stadie & Bittner/ D. Stadie & Löbel, g.preps. DS 39, 40, 86 & 87/2012; all in DSPC.

Problepsis ocellata; 1 ♂, Asia minor mer. or. Tarsus, Namrun, 1000 m, 20.9.1969, leg. D.K. Bernhauer; 1 ♂, Asia minor, Taurus vand, Tarsus, 18.6.1994, leg. W. Thomas; 3 ♂, 1 ♀, Asia minor occ. Izmir, S Darutsav Hotel Ietis, 5 m, 28.8.-2.9.1984, leg. St. Reiss, g. prep. 372/2017, S. Feizpour; 1 ♀, Kleinasien, prov. Antalya, vic. Kemer, 1 m, 25.-28.5.1982, leg. de Freina; 1 ♂, Kleinasien. Prov. Içel, 40 km NNW Silifke, vic. Kargicak, 200 m, 19.4.1985, leg. de Freina; 2 ♀, Turkey, prov. Mersin, Erdemli, 14.6.1974, leg. W. Thomas; 3 ♀, Turkey, prov. Mersin, Umg. Mut., 18.6.1974, leg. W. Thomas, g. prep. 373/2017, S. Feizpour; 6 ♂, 5 ♂, Turkey, Anatolia, Silifke-Boğsah, 20-25.10.1974, leg. H. Krusz; 1 ♂, Karatepe, TR. 4.1973, leg. Czipka L. g. prep. 376/2017, S. Feizpour; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Turkey, prov. Mersin, Umg. Tarsus, 18.6.1974, leg. W. Thomas; 1 ♂, Grecia, Umg. Kamena-Vourla, 400 m, 10.6.1979, leg. G. König; 1 ♂, Grecia, Fokida, W Delfi, 38°28′N, 22°28″E, 14.8.1996, leg. Ch. Reiger; all in SMNS.

DNA Barcoding

For comparison of Cytochrome c Oxidase, subunit-I (DNA Barcode), the barcode data of Problepsis species (Stadie & Stadie 2016) were obtained from Barcode Of Life Database (BOLD). Subsequently, DNA of freshly collected specimens from Iran was extracted, their DNA barcode region amplified and sequenced according to standard protocols (Ivanova et al. 2006, Hebert et al. 2003) in the molecular laboratory of State Museum of Natural History, Stuttgart. In total 658 bp of DNA Barcode were aligned using BioEdit (ver. 7.2.5.) (Hall 1999). A list of all specimens used for DNA analysis along with their GenBank accession numbers are presented in Table 1 (appendix). Neighbor-joining tree and genetic distances were calculated by MEGA6 (Tamura et al. 2013).

3 Results

Problepsis cinerea (Butler, 1886)

  • Argyria cinerea Butler, 1886, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 3: 387. Type locality: [Pakistan], Campbellpore [near Rawal Pindee], Syntype (s), coll. NHMUK, London.

  • 3.1 Morphology

    Wing pattern. (Figs. 1-3) Wingspan 39-41 mm (length of forewing: 20 mm). Background of forewing creamy light-brown mixed with ochreous, weakly glossy scales, costal area slightly darker. A large rounded eyespot in median area is characteristic, bordered with a thin black outer line, encircled an olive-brown thicker inner band, toward center a second thick black line shadowed with silvery scales, central area separated into two part, the upper two third light brown and the lower third black. Hind wing lighter than forewing. Eye-spot elliptical, without triangle black shapes internally; a small black patch near the dorsum, sometimes splitted. Underside creamy light, with a dull print of all patterns of upper-side (for more details see Stadie & Stadie 2016).

    Male genitalia (Fig. 9). (based on specimens from Pakistan). Socii thin, weakly sclerotized connected from both sides except apical part. Tegumen ventrally more sclerotized with nine prominent spines, usually angled near socii. Aedeagus slender, tubular, more sclerotized, forming a long two-head cleft, one more bent, shorter with two teeth. Vesica as two diverticuli; without any cornuti.

    Figs. 9-13.

    Genitalia structure. 9-10., 9. Problepsis cinerea, 10. P. ocellata; 9. P. cinerea ♂; 10. P. ocellata ♂ (10a-2 lateral view); 11-13. ♀; 11-12. P. cinerea (Iran, Pakistan respectively); 13, P. ocellata (Turkey), a, armature, b, aedeagus and vesica, c, sternite 8, de. sclerotized dentation, ma. Mappa, so. Socii; Scale-bar: 1 mm.

    f09_47.jpg

    Figs. 14-19.

    Structure of hind leg and hair pencil. 14. Problepsis cinerea, 15-19. Problepsis ocellata, 15-16. general view of spoonshaped hind tibia with long hair pencil; 17. close-up view of tubular hollow scent scale; 18. Flattened scales in comparison with normal body scales, 19. Mixture of both tubular and flattened scales of hair pencil.

    f14_47.jpg

    Female genitalia. (Fig. 11). Papillae anales in moderate size, broad, with sparse hairs. Anterior apophyses slightly shorter (80%) than posterior apophyses. Antrum strongly sclerotized, tubular, medially narrower. Ductus bursae very short, heavily sclerotized. Corpus bursae membranous, apple-shaped; signum as a sclerotized spotted patch covering more than half of the length of corpus bursae.

    Fig. 20.

    Un-rooted neighbor-joining tree of four species Problepsis ocellata, P. cinerea, P. sihvoneni, P. asira (with Kimura 2-Parameter model). Iranian specimen clustered with P. cinerea.

    f20_47.jpg

    Diagnosis. The most similar species to P. cinerea is P. ocellata (Frivaldszky, 1845) (Figs. 4-5). The distribution pattern and the habitats of these two species are well separated and different (P. ocellata is distributed in Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, eastern Syria and south eastern Turkey towards Greece and Cyprus, whereas P. cinerea is known from northern Oman and southern Iran in the west towards eastern Afghanistan and Pakistan (see below). Vertical distribution of these two species is also different: P. ocellata is distributed in altitudes from sea level up to 1000 m, P. cinerea occurs much higher between 1000-2200 m a. s. 1. (mostly above 1800 m) (Stadie & Stadie 2016). Additionally, P. ocellata has paler, greyish wings, with a light-yellow spot on the upper half of the eye pots, and has more yellowish inner band in both wings. In male of P. ocellata, 8th sternite anteriorly wider (narrower in P. cinerea) (Fig. 9c, 10c). Tegumen more sclerotized, round-shaped ventrally (thinner in P. cinerea). Apical part of aedeagus and subapical dentation less sclerotized and not clearly visible (strongly sclerotized dentation in P. cinerea) (Figs. 9-10). In female genitalia of P. ocellata, anterior apophyses much shorter than posterior apophyses (50%), (whilst being 80% in P. cinerea). Ductus bursae wider, corpus bursae smaller than those in P. cinerea (Figs. 11-13).

    Map.

    Distribution map of Problepsis cinerea and P. ocellata in the Middle East. The European part of distribution of P. ocellata is not shown.

    m01_47.jpg

    Remark. Stadie & Stadie (2016) regarded two subspecies for Problepsis ocellata (ssp. ocellata distributed in east Mediterranean Sea, i.e. Greek islands, Crete and coasts of west Turkey and ssp. cypria in Cyprus). These two subspecies were based on geographic separation of slightly different in wing pattern (e.g. darker ground colour with wider median shade and presence of a small blackish horizontal line in basal part of forewing near dorsum in ssp. cypria (lighter ground colour and missing the horizontal line in nominate ssp.). These two subspecies show no genetic distance in DNA-barcodes, which confirms that they belong to the same species. For evaluation of these two subspecies further larval studies, biological and ecological investigations are recommended.

    Morphological note. A close-up view of the structure of the genus Problepsis is shown (Fig. 14-19). At least two different modified scales in this hair pencil are recognizable: most of them are apically flattened, while some tubular hollow scales are scattered in between (Figs. 17-19). Spoon-shaped hind tibia created a chamber, which conceal the tubular scent scales with the help of flattened ones (Figs. 14, 15). Hypothetically, during courtship those flattened scales uncover the tubular ones.

    3.2 DNA-Barcoding

    The unrooted neighbor-joining tree (Fig. 20) shows the clustering of the Iranian specimen with P. cinerea among the specimens from Pakistan and Oman. Genetic mean distances between Problepsis species in the Middle East are shown in table 1.

    Table 1.

    Genetic mean distances (COI) between Problepsis species in the Middle East resulted from neighbor-joining analyses with Kimura 2-Parameter model (see NJ tree in Fig. 20).

    t01_47.gif

    3.3 Distribution and habitat

    Problepsis cinerea is confined to evergreen and sclerophyllous woodlands mostly with Olea species in North Oman, South Iran, eastern Afghanistan and Pakistan. Vertically it is distributed between 1000-2200 m (in N Oman and S Iran in altitudes over 1800 m).

    The newly recorded species in Iran was found in the Khalijo-Omanian ecological zone, consisting of both dry southern coastal plains and mountainous parts with higher humidity. The community harbors both plants of tropical and palaearctic-eremic origin. Habitats of this zone are mostly covered with Artemisia, Acacia, Prosopis, Ziziphus, Avicennia, Rhizophora, Populus, Astragalus, Amygdalus, Dodonaea, Pistacia and Olea (Zohary 1973, Heshmati 2007).

    Its habitat in southern Iran is located in the Geno protected area (30 km northwest of Bandar Abbas) (Figs. 6–8), with a relatively warm climate (the annual mean temperature 26.8 degree Celsius) ( http://taziyaniha.blogfa.com/post-76.aspx). Variable climate conditions, geological characters and altitudes in the Geno area generate ideal habitat for a vast range of plants. Generally, three different vegetation communities may be recognized in this area: 1) Acacia community in slopes (e.g. Acacia ehrenbergiana, A. nilotica, Andrachne aspera, A. maxima); 2) Amygdalus community in the middle elevations (e.g. Amygdalus scopario, A. wendelboi, A. eburnea): 3) Juniperus community in higher altitudes and peaks (e.g. Juniperus excelsia, J. polycarpos, Olea europaea cuspidata) ( http://www.ettelaat.com/etiran/?p=163643; Mojdeh Raam, personal comm.).

    Most Problepsis species feed on Oleaceae species (Stadie & Stadie 2016). Asadpoor (2005) claimed that there is no Oleaceae species in southern Iran, therefore the presence of Problepsis species in Iran questioned by Stadie & Stadie (2016). However there are several cultivate but also wild Oleaceae species in southern Iran. As Olea europaea cuspidata is the only wild olive species in Geno protected area, therefore we suggest this tree as potential natural host plant of P. cinerea in the south of Iran (Figs. 6, 7, 8).

    Acknowledgements

    The authors thank Alireza Teimouri, Amir Hossein Dadashi, Alireza Naderi (Department of Environment, Tehran) for issuing the permission letter for sampling in Iran. Additionally, the first author is grateful to the staff of the Geno protected area, namely Majid Vafadar and Abdolreza Dehghani (Department of Environmental Protection, Hormozgan) for accompanying and kind supports during the fieldworks. Our special thanks go to Axel Hausmann and Paul Hebert (CCDB, University of Guelph, Canada) and their teams for kindly and professionally performing the sequencing of Problepsis material and giving access and permission for publishing these data. Finally yet importantly, thanks to Cristina Gascó Martin for her patiently helps during SEM photography. This publication was partially supported by the Research Incentive Grant of State Museum of Natural History, Stuttgart, Germany.

    4 References

    1.

    Asadpoor, R. ( 2005): Ecological regions of Iran-Vegetation types of Bashagard-Taheroei Area. – Ministry of Jahad-e-Agriculture, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. 202 pp, Tehran. Google Scholar

    2.

    Birch, M. C., Poppy, G. M., & Baker, T. C. ( 1990): Scents and eversible scent structures of male moths. – Annual Review of Entomology 35: 25–58. Google Scholar

    3.

    Butler, A. G. ( 1886): On Lepidoptera collected by Major Yerbury in Western India. – Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 3: 355–395, pl. XXXV. Google Scholar

    4.

    Hall, T. A. ( 1999): BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. – Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. Google Scholar

    5.

    Hausmann, A. ( 1998): New and interesting Geometrid moths from the Oman (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). – Mitteilungen der Münchner entomologischen Gesellschaft 88: 85–98. Google Scholar

    6.

    Hausmann, A. ( 2004): Sterrhinae. – In: Hausmann, A. (ed.): The Geometrid Moths of Europe 2: 1–600; Apollo Books, Dinamarca. Google Scholar

    7.

    Holloway, J. D. ( 1997): The Moths of Borneo, pt. 10, Geometridae: Sterrhinae, Larentiinae. – Malayan Nature Journal 51: 1–242. Google Scholar

    8.

    Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & de Waard, J. R. ( 2003): Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. – Proceedings the Royal Society of London 270: 313–321. Google Scholar

    9.

    Hernández-Roldán, J. L., Bofill, R., Dapporto, L., Munguira, M. L. & Vila, R. ( 2014): Morphological and chemical analysis of male scent organs in the butterfly genus Pyrgus (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). – Organism Diversity & Evolution. DOI 10.1007/S13127-014-0170-x. Google Scholar

    10.

    Heshmati, G. A. ( 2007): Vegetation characteristics of four ecological zones of Iran. – International journal of plant protection 2: 215–224. Google Scholar

    11.

    Kristensen, N. P. ( 1999): Homoneurous Glossata, In N. P. Kristensen (Ed.) Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Vol. 1: Evolution, Systematics & Biogeography (Handbuch der Zoologie, Band 4, Teilband 35) (pp. 51–63). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar

    12.

    Kristensen, N. P. & Simonsen, Th. J. ( 2003): Hair and Scales, In N. P. Kristensen (Ed.) Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Vol. 2: Morphology, Physiology, and Development (Handbuch der Zoologie, Band 4, Teilband 36) (pp. 9–22). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar

    13.

    Reisser, H. ( 1957): Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Sterrhinae (Lep. Geom.) III über Problepsis ocellata Friv. und ihre ersten stände. – Zeitschrift der Wiener Entomologische Gesellschaft 42 (11): 161–172. Google Scholar

    14.

    Robinson, G. S. ( 1976): The preparation of slides of Lepidoptera genitalia with special reference to the Microlepidoptera. – Entomologist's Gazette 27: 127–132. Google Scholar

    15.

    Scoble, M. J. ( 1999): Geometrid Moths of the World, a Catalogue. CSIRO Publishing, Apollo Books Collingwood, Stenstrup, Australia/Denmark, 400 pp. Google Scholar

    16.

    Scoble, M. J. & Hausmann, A. [updated 2007]: Online list of valid and available names of the Geometridae of the World [ http://www.herbulot.de/globalspecieslist.htm]. Google Scholar

    17.

    Sihvonen, P. & Kaila, L. ( 2004): Phylogeny and tribal classification of Sterrhinae with emphasis on delimiting Scopulini (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). – Systematic Entomology 29: 324–358. Google Scholar

    18.

    Sihvonen, P. ( 2005): Phylogeny and classification of Scopulini moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Sterrhinae). – Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 143: 473–530. Google Scholar

    19.

    Sihvonen, P. & Siljander, M. ( 2005): Species diversity and geographical distribution of Scopulini moths (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Sterrhinae) on a world-wide scale. – Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 703–721. Google Scholar

    20.

    Skou, P., Stüning, D. & Sihvonen, P. ( 2017): Revision of the West-Mediterranean geometrid genus Ekboarmia, with description of a new species from Portugal (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae). – Nota Lepidopterologica 40 (1) 2017: 39–63. Google Scholar

    21.

    Stadie, D. & Stadie, Ph. ( 2016): The problepsis ocellata Frivaldszky, 1845 species lineage-an integrative survey of their morphology, species radiation, distribution and ecology (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Sterrhinae). – Esperiana 20 (2): 381–429. Google Scholar

    22.

    Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. ( 2013): MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution – 30 (12): 2725–2729. Google Scholar

    23.

    Knölke, S., Erlacher, S., Hausmann, A., Miller, M. A. & Segerer, A. H. ( 2005): A procedure for combined genitalia dissection and DNA extraction in Lepidoptera. – Insect systematics & evolution 35 (4): 401–409. Google Scholar

    Appendices

    APPENDIX TABLE 2.

    List of sequenced specimens, with identification, sampling sites, accession numbers and process ID in BOLD database. Data taken from BOLD and Stadie & Stadie, 2016. Data generated by: (1) by present study; (2) Axel Hausmann; (3) Knolke et al., 2005.

    tA01a_47.gif

    tA01b_47.gif
    Shamsi Feizpour, Lida Fekrat, Hussein Sadeghi Namaghi, Dirk Stadie, and Hossein Rajaei "Combination of morphological characters and DNA-barcoding confirms Problepsis cinerea (Butler, 1886) (Geometridae: Sterrhinae: Scopulini) as a new genus and species for the fauna of Iran," Integrative Systematics: Stuttgart Contributions to Natural History 1(1), 47-57, (1 December 2018). https://doi.org/10.18476/insy.v01.a6
    Received: 31 July 2017; Accepted: 1 November 2017; Published: 1 December 2018
    KEYWORDS
    DNA-barcoding
    Geno protected area
    hair pencil
    Olea spp.
    Problepsis ocellata
    Scopulini
    Back to Top