Changes in national forest areas during 1990–2000 are contrasted with other variables to illustrate correlations and provoke discussion about possible causes. Twenty-five statistically-significant correlations (including rural population, life expectancy, GDP, literacy, commerce, agriculture, poverty and inflation) are illustrated and a statistical model suggests that good governance, alternative employment opportunities, and payments for environmental services may be effective in combating deforestation. The data suggest that a global forest convention may need to be supported by substantial and carefully-targeted development assistance to foster good governance.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2005
Deforestation: Correlations, Possible Causes and Some Implications
Jerome K. Vanclay
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
International Forestry Review
Vol. 7 • No. 4
December 2005
Vol. 7 • No. 4
December 2005
deforestation
global forest convention
governance
payments for environmental services