Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2015 The Biological Flora of Coastal Dunes and Wetlands: Solidago sempervirens L. and Solidago sempervirens L. subsp. mexicana (L.) Semple
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Lonard, R.I.; Judd, F.W., and Stalter, R., 2015. The biological flora of coastal dunes and wetlands: Solidago sempervirens L. and Solidago sempervirens L. subsp. mexicana (L.) Semple.

Solidago sempervirens L. and Solidago sempervirens L. subsp. mexicana (L.) Semple are New World humid continental, temperate, subtropical, and tropical maritime taxa. Both taxa are long-lived perennials that occur in wet mineral sands and clay soils. Reproduction is primarily vegetative in stable sites. However, achene/seed production is prolific, and seed viability is high in either stable or disturbed sites. Also known as seaside goldenrod, both taxa occur in conditions ranging from freshwater to salinity conditions of 40 parts per thousand. Seeds and seedlings do not tolerate excessive burial, but high levels of sand deposition are associated with plant vigor in mature clones. Optimal growth for both taxa occurs in habitats with increasing distance from the water table.

INTRODUCTION

The perennial genus Solidago (Asteraceae) includes about 80 species in North America and several additional species in South America, the Azores, and Eurasia (Mabberley, 1997; Semple et al., 1984). The genus is represented in a wide variety of habitats including grasslands and disturbed sites. Some species have been introduced into Europe as ornamentals. Solidago sempervirens (seaside goldenrod) is a long-lived perennial that occurs on dunes, in brackish marshes, in grasslands, and in disturbed sites in the coastal landscape. Seaside goldenrod is occasionally a codominant species associated with a perennial grass Ammophila breviligulata in dunes in the coastal landscape of the northeastern Atlantic coast of North America. Herein, we review the biology of this important coastal species.

TAXONOMY AND VARIATION

Solidago sempervirens L. is a member of the family Asteraceae (Compositae), and is included in the tribe Astereae. A synonym and rejected name for S. sempervirens subsp. sempervirens is Aster sempervirens (L.) Kuntze. Common names include seaside goldenrod and verge d'or toujours verte. Synonyms for S. sempervirens L. subsp. mexicana (L.) Semple are A. mexicanus (L.) Kuntze, S. sempervirens var. mexicana (L.) Fern., S. limonifolia Pers., S. laevigata Ait., and S. mexicana L. Seaside goldenrod, saltmarsh goldenrod, and small-headed seaside goldenrod are common names for the taxon.

Taxonomic Description

The following taxonomic description has been derived from Correll and Correll (1972), Fernald (1950), Flora of North America Editorial Committee (2006), Gandhi and Thomas, (1989), Gleason and Cronquist (1963), Lehman, O'Brien, and White (2005), and Radford, Ahles, and Bell (1968).

Seeds

A single seed lacking endosperm is borne in an indehiscent cypsela (achene). Many authors use the term “seed” to designate the seed and the enveloping mature ovary wall.

Seedling Morphology

Seaside goldenrod seeds often germinate in late fall and winter (Orava and Drake, 1997). Seedling recruitment is rare and is limited to open spaces or blowout gaps (Lee, 1993). Leaves, 55 days after germination, are simple, alternately arranged, and gradually tapered and winged to the petiole (Goodwin, 1937). Blades are linear, mostly glabrous, and have a net venation pattern with inconspicuous venation (Goodwin, 1937).

Shoot Morphology

Plants are perennial, 0.4 to 2.5 m tall with short, persistent woody bases (caudices). Stems are 1 to 20, unbranched, erect or ascending, and are usually glabrous. Leaves are simple, alternate, somewhat succulent and glabrous, and the margins are entire. Blades are narrowly ovate to oblanceolate, 10 to 40 cm long and 1 to 7 cm wide, tapered to elongate, and with winged petioles. Blades near the stem apex are numerous and sessile. A basal rosette of leaves is conspicuous.

Inflorescence

The inflorescence consists of a series of heads (capitula). Heads are arranged in paniculate, corymbiform, or recurved-secund branching patterns. Peduncles are glabrous or slightly pubescent and 2 to 3 mm long. Involucres are 3 to 7 mm long, the phyllaries are imbricate, acute, or acuminate, and ciliate on the margins. The heads are radiate. Ray florets are pistillate, yellow, 8 to 17 in number, 5 to 6.5 mm long, and about 0.5 mm wide. Disc florets are bisexual, yellow, 10 to 22 in number, and are 3 to 5.5 mm long, and the lobes are 0.5 to 1.0 mm long. The receptacle is naked.

Fruits

The achenes are obconic, 1 to 3.5 mm long, and strigose pubescent. The pappus is about 3.5 to 5.5 mm long and club shaped.

Variability

Two closely related subspecies of S. sempervirens are recognized in North America, subsp. sempervirens and subsp. mexicana (Semple, 2003). Subspecies sempervirens is a robust plant with lower leaves 2 to 7 cm wide. The involucre is 4 to 7 mm long. The receptacle has 12 to 17 ray florets and 17 to 22 disc florets. Subspecies mexicana is a more slender plant with lower leaves 1 to 3 cm wide. The involucre is 3 to 4.5 mm long. The receptacle contains 7 to 11 ray florets and 10 to 16 disc florets (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Solidago sempervirens subsp. mexicana in cultivation with monarch butterflies in Brownsville, Texas. Solidago sempervirens subsp. sempervirens (not shown) is morphologically similar at maturity. It has larger heads and broader lower leaves.

i1551-5036-31-6-1512-f01.tif

Semple et al. (1984) recognized S. sempervirens var. azorica (Hochstetter ex Seubert) H. St. John, which is naturalized or adventive in the Azores. A cultivated variety has been identified as S. sempervirens var. viminea (Ait.) Gray.

Solidago sempervirens is known to hybridize in North America as follows: S. sempervirens × S. rugosa Mill. = Solidago × asperula Desf.), and S. sempervirens × S. canadensis L. = Solidago × erskinei Boivín (Goodwin, 1937; NYFA, 2014). A rare pale yellow color form was described by Harris (1958).

Chromosome Number

Solidago sempervirens has a chromosome number of 2n = 18 with no variation in chromosome numbers across the range of the species and its varieties or subspecies (Goodwin, 1944; Innes and Hermanutz, 1988; Radford, Ahles, and Bell, 1968; Semple et al., 1984).

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Solidago sempervirens has a broad distributional range from Newfoundland and Labrador in Canada, through the Atlantic coastal states of the United States, to the West Indies and Central America (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2006).The species has been introduced inland adjacent to saline sites in the last 60 years along the shorelines of the Great Lakes including Ontario, Canada, Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana (Flora North America Editorial Committee, 2006; Wieczorek and Geber, 2002).

Subspecies sempervirens has a northern distributional range from the Canadian provinces southward to New York, southeastern Massachusetts, and locally to northern Virginia (Lamont, 1994). Subspecies mexicana has a southern distributional pattern that ranges from Central America, southern Mexico, the northern West Indies, and from Texas to Florida. It also occurs in Delaware and locally from southern New York and southeastern Massachusetts (Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2006; Lamont, 1994). Therefore, the distributional range of the two subspecies overlaps in coastal sites of Virginia to New York and southeastern Massachusetts. Subspecies mexicana has been reported inland in south-central Texas (Fleenor and Taber, 2009). Table 1 includes a summary of the geographical distribution patterns and morphological variability of the closely related subspecies sempervirens and subspecies mexicana.

Table 1.

Comparison of Solidago sempervirens subsp. sempervirens and Solidago sempervirens subsp. mexicana (adapted from Flora of North America, 2006 and Lamont, 1994).

i1551-5036-31-6-1512-t01.eps

RANGE OF HABITATS

Solidago sempervirens subsp. sempervirens and S. sempervirens subsp. mexicana occur in similar habitats in the broad geographical distribution of the species. Oosting and Billings (1942) reported that this species is found with greater cover values with increasing distance from the water table.

Subspecies sempervirens is reported on embryo dunes, foredunes, dune ridges, in slightly accreting sites close to the beach, in swales, in coastal grasslands, on margins of estuaries, on upper margins of salt marshes, in brackish marshes, and in freshwater wetlands (Buchsbaum et al., 2006; Clampitt, 1991; Crain, Albertson, and Bertness, 2008; Crain et al., 2004; Disraeli, 1984; Dunlop and Crow, 1985; Godfrey and Wooten, 1981; Innes and Hermanutz, 1988; Klotz, 1986; Lamont and Stalter, 1991; Lee, 1993, 1995; McAvoy and Bennett, 2001; Stalter, 1974; Wunderlin and Hansen, 2001). It also occurs in disturbed sites including drift lines, overwashes, blowouts, roadside margins that have been treated with deicing agents, sites adjacent to inland brine wells, and even on an abandoned elevated rail line in New York City (Hill, 1986; Innes and Hermanutz, 1988; Rhoads and Block, 2007; Stalter, 2004; Swink and Wilhelm, 1994).

Habitats and topographic facets where subspecies mexicana occurs in more temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions include upper beaches; dunes; swales; upper, rarely flooded salt marshes; brackish marshes; freshwater marshes; and disturbed sites (Anderson and Alexander, 1985; Eleuterius, 1972; Eleuterius and McDaniel, 1978; Fleenor and Taber, 2009; Lehman, O'Brien, and White, 2005; Lonard et al., 1991, 1999; McAvoy and Bennett, 2001; Oosting and Billings, 1942; Radford, Ahles, and Bell, 1968; Stalter, 1974, 1993; Stalter and Lamont, 1993, 1997; Stutzenbaker, 1999).

Substrate Characteristics

Subspecies mexicana typically occurs in low-mineral wet sands and clay soils, and salinity values usually range from 0 to 10 parts per thousand (ppt) in the Upper Gulf of Mexico coastal zone (Stutzenbaker, 1999). In South Carolina, Stalter (1968) reported that this subspecies usually occurs about 1.7 m above mean sea level, and salinity values range from 10 to 40 ppt. He noted that pH values range from 6.0 to 7.5. In southern Florida, Stalter et al. (1999) indicated that soil salinities ranged from 25.4 to 39.9 ppt. On South Padre Island, Texas, Judd, Lonard, and Sides (1977) noted that the depth to the water table in dune depressions where subspecies mexicana occurs is 14 to 56 cm, and 85.9% of sand particles range from 0.18 to 0.25 mm.

Climatic Requirements

Solidago sempervirens, including its two subspecies, occurs over climatic conditions ranging from a tropical to a humid continental (temperate oceanic) climate in Newfoundland where winter-extreme low temperatures may range from −19°C to −32°C (Brown and Cooprider, 2010; Stalter and Lamont, 2006). The species extends from about 18°N latitude in southern Tabasco, Mexico, to about 47°N latitude in southern Newfoundland. In the broad spectrum of climatic zones where this species occurs, plants survive unfavorable conditions through a compact rhizome system and by the production of freeze-resistant achenes. In more temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions plants overwinter as basal rosettes (Cartica and Quinn, 1982; Lee, 1995).

PLANT COMMUNITIES

Plant communities on sandy coastlines where this species occurs are referred to by inconsistently used terminology. Most workers identify plant communities according to the topographic facets in which S. sempervirens occurs. For example, Judd, Lonard, and Sides (1977) associated plant communities on South Padre Island, Texas with topographic facets. They noted that subspecies mexicana typically occurs in swales in the secondary dunes and vegetated flats zone. Lee (1995) indicated that subspecies sempervirens is an important taxon in the primary dunes in New Jersey where the perennial grass Ammophila breviligulata is the dominant species.

Stalter (1993) and Sutton, Meyer, and Stalter (1990) placed seaside goldenrod in dune plant communities in New Hampshire and New Jersey, and Lamont and Stalter (1991) and Stalter and Lamont (2000, 2002) stated that S. sempervirens occurs in maritime beach and swale communities in New York and Virginia.

A few workers have named plant communities according to the dominant species in the community. A marram (A. breviligulata)–forb grassland community has been described in Nova Scotia (Catling, Freedman, and Lucas, 1984), and Martin (1959) described a dune grass (A. breviligulata)–beach heather (Hudsonia tomentosa)–low thicket mixture in New Jersey where S. sempervirens is a conspicuous species. Table 2 includes species associated with S. sempervirens in selected sites without designations of topographic zones, habitats, or plant communities.

Table 2.

Representative species associated with Solidago sempervirens in the New World.

i1551-5036-31-6-1512-t02.eps

PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY

Limited physiological data are available for S. sempervirens. It is a somewhat succulent C3 plant in its manner of carbon fixation in the light-independent reactions of photosynthesis (Wozniak et al., 2006). Plants are salt tolerant in the harsh coastal environment where salt spray is usually deposited within 500 m of the high-tide mark (Ehrenfeld, 1990). Martin (1959) found no foliar damage of mature plants after 15 consecutive days of watering with undiluted seawater. Brauer and Geber (2002) indicated that this species does not have a physiological dependence on salt. Cartica and Quinn (1980) found that leaf thickness of dune colonies is significantly greater than in populations protected in the lee of the dune complex. No significant differences were noted in stomatal and foliar pubescence in either population. Salts are apparently sequestered in vacuoles (Cartica and Quinn, 1980). Leaves and stems have a low silica content ranging from 0.06% to 0.22%, and ash contents range from about 6.8% to 9.6% in leaves and stems (Lanning and Eleuterius, 1983).

Phenology

Flowering phenophases for both subspecies vary along a N-S geographical gradient (Goodwin, 1944). In New Jersey, Cartica and Quinn (1982) noted that aerial shoots of subspecies sempervirens die in the fall and survive winter conditions in a basal rosette. Fernald (1950), Hill (1986), Lee (1995), and Rhoads and Block (2007) stated that flowering occurs from late July to November. Achenes are mature in late November, and the aerodynamic achenes are dispersed through late April. Peak flowering phenophases correspond to short-day photoperiods (Brauer and Geber, 2002).

Flowering phenophases for subspecies mexicana in warm temperate and subtropical regions are usually later in season. Anderson and Alexander (1985) and Eleuterius and Caldwell (1984) reported flowering in October and November in Florida and Mississippi, respectively, and Lonard and Judd (1989) noted that this subspecies is in flower and fruit throughout the calendar year on South Padre Island, Texas.

POPULATION BIOLOGY

Solidago sempervirens is a long-lived perennial with short clustered rhizomes. It survives harsh winter conditions as a basal rosette throughout most of its range. Older clones usually produce 5 to 20 densely arranged rosettes, but up to 100 rosettes have been recorded for long-lived clones (Lee, 1995).

Population Dynamics

Natural disturbance is an important factor affecting population dynamics in coastal ecosystems. Seaside goldenrod is referred to as a gap species in blowouts in the dune complex of New Jersey, but it also occurs in immature grasslands and as well as in well-established grassland zones (Lee, 1993). Blowouts and transition zones are sites where seed (achene) rain produces an extensive achene shadow in exposed gaps in the plant cover. Lee (1993) noted that achenes fall to the ground within 10 m outside blowouts. Lower cover values of plants were found in undisturbed sites due to lack of achene dispersal from blowouts.

REPRODUCTION

Solidago sempervirens reproduces sexually, is self-incompatible, and depends on insects for pollination (Brauer and Geber, 2002; Cartica and Quinn, 1980). Cartica and Quinn (1982) reported that 3.9% to 28.3% of aboveground biomass is directed toward sexual reproduction. Pollinators include honeybees and butterflies (Richardson and King, 2011; Stutzenbaker, 1999).

Achene (Seed) Production and Viability

Achene production, equated with seed production, is extraordinary. Lee (1993) reported a seed rain in blowouts on dunes in New Jersey as 30,700 ±1000 seeds/m2. Lee (1995) found that 76% to 98% of subspecies sempervirens seeds germinated from populations sampled in New Jersey. Stalter (1968) and Stalter and Batson (1973) estimated that 67% are viable in populations of subspecies mexicana in South Carolina.

Dispersal

Solidago sempervirens is a widely distributed New World humid continental, temperate, subtropical, and tropical maritime species. Ridley (1930) estimated that the plumed pappus of the achenes allows aerodynamic propagules to travel an estimated 2200 km to oceanic islands. Orava and Drake (1997) also indicated that this species is adapted to oceanic dispersal with subsequent establishment in saline sites.

Minchinton, Simpson, and Bertness (2006) reported that achenes float. Ehrenfeld (1990) stated that subspecies mexicana achenes may be dispersed by ghost crabs (Ocypode albicans) and buried in their burrows. Dispersal by birds is also possible (Lonard and Judd, 1980).

Achene Size and Seed Bank

Achene lengths of subspecies mexicana range from 2.2 to 3.5 mm (Orava and Drake, 1997), and achenes weigh 0.79 mg for subspecies sempervirens (Goodwin, 1937). Lee (1993) reported that the seed bank for subspecies sempervirens is negligible and 0 to 57 seeds/m2 were found in sample plots. Most achenes fell from inflorescences between late November and late April on New Jersey coastal dunes (Lee, 1993). Crain, Albertson, and Bertness (2008) found 26 to 38 achenes/m2 but found no germinating seeds in the substrate from 0.25-m2 plots in Rhode Island brackish marshes.

Germination Ecology and Establishment of Seedlings

Optimal germination of subspecies sempervirens seeds is promoted by freshwater and sunlight and is inhibited by high salinities and shading (Shumway and Bertness, 1992). Complex dormancy mechanisms promote germination in subspecies mexicana after cold stratification and exposure to light (van der Valk, 1974). van der Valk (1974) noted that few seedlings of subspecies mexicana were found on the foredunes of the North Carolina shoreline.

Seeds of subspecies sempervirens exposed to seawater at 30 ppt for 1 to 10 days, washed, and placed in freshwater had 45% to 60% germination success, but seeds exposed to seawater 6 to 10 days germinated more rapidly than seeds exposed for shorter periods and subsequently placed in freshwater (Orava and Drake, 1997). Seeds exposed only to a freshwater treatment germinated at a rate eight times higher than those exposed to seawater (Orava and Drake, 1997).

Vegetative Reproduction

Reproduction in subspecies mexicana in relatively stable sites on North Carolina foredunes is primarily vegetative (van der Valk, 1974). However, Lee (1995) stated that perennial clones of subspecies sempervirens produce numerous compact rosettes on dunes in New Jersey, but vegetative reproduction by compact rhizomes is limited.

GEOMORPHOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS

Solidago sempervirens plays a minor role in coastal geomorphology. Sheahan (2012) suggested that this species could play a role in erosion control and dune stabilization. Courtmanche, Hester, and Mendelssohn (1999) found that subspecies mexicana was eliminated by overwash of a hurricane. Plants were absent 1 year after the storm but were found in low frequency the following year.

Response to Burial

Solidago sempervirens seeds and seedlings do not tolerate excessive burial (Baptista and Shumway, 1998). van der Valk (1974) indicated that seedlings are unable to survive under more than 5 cm of sand. However, high levels of sand deposition are associated with plant vigor in mature clones (Lee, 1995). van der Valk (1974) reported that mature plants survived 56 cm of sand deposition.

INTERACTION WITH OTHER SPECIES

A symbiotic relationship exists between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and S. sempervirens. AMF promote absorption of water and minerals from the substrate. At least six species of AMF are found in the rhizosphere of seaside goldenrod on the coastal dune complex of Rhode Island (Koske and Halvorson, 1981). AMF were noted only on small lateral roots and ranged from 10% to 80% for individual plants (Koske and Halvorson, 1981).

Predation

Rabbits and white-tailed deer occasionally browse on juvenile S. sempervirens plants (Sheahan, 2012). Insect predators may cause extensive defoliation and include beetles (Trirhabda borealis) and seed moths (Coleophora triplicus) (Ancheta, Heard, and Lyons, 2010). Ho and Pennings (2013) and Salgado and Pennings (2005) studied the food habits of grasshoppers (Paroxya clavuliger) and aphids (Uroleucon pielou) that feed on S. sempervirens populations in northern and southern latitudes. High-latitude populations of seaside goldenrod have a higher nitrogen content and are more palatable to grasshoppers than plants native to southern latitudes (Salgado and Pennings, 2005). Ho and Pennings (2013) reached a similar conclusion in a feeding study of aphids. High-latitude plants have higher food quality than lower-latitude plants, and insect predators are larger at high altitudes.

Competition and Facilitation

Solidago sempervirens is often regarded as a gap specialist because it occurs in blowouts in dune systems dominated by the perennial grass A. breviligulata (Lee, 1995). Blowouts may bury A. breviligulata clones and this enhances cover and aboveground biomass of S. sempervirens (Lee, 1995). Lee (1995) stated that S. sempervirens, an inferior competitor with A. breviligulata, can coexist in an environment dominated by the superior competitor.

Brauer and Geber (2002) found that seaside goldenrod has low competitive ability in a nonsaline landscape. Physical factors including human-induced changes in soil salinity are correlated with an increase in abundance of seaside goldenrod (Frankowski et al., 1977).

In Massachusetts, Minchinton, Simpson, and Bertness (2006) found that the aggressive dominant, Phragmites australis, excluded S. sempervirens and other species by competitive interactions at the highest elevations of brackish marshes. They noted that the presence of P. australis litter has a negative impact on the colonization of seaside goldenrod and other species.

In a pioneer zone of blowouts and other disturbed sites, the perennial S. sempervirens has negative impacts on smaller annuals (Cheplick and Aliotta, 2009). Weedy grasses including Cenchrus tribuloides, Digitaria sanguinalis, Triplasis purpurea, and the mat-forming forb Mollugo verticillata show significant reductions in vegetative cover in sites adjacent to established populations of S. sempervirens. A taller species, C. tribuloides, is significantly reduced when it occurs in proximity to seaside goldenrod (Cheplick and Aliotta, 2009).

Facilitation or positive interactions occur between the nitrogen-fixing shrub Morella pensylvanica and S. sempervirens and A. breviligulata on the Massachusetts coastline (Shumway, 2000). Solidago sempervirens plants growing under the canopy of M. pensylvanica are more robust, are more likely to flower, have a higher photosynthetic efficiency, and have a higher concentration of nitrates than plants outside the canopy (Shumway, 2000). The environment below the canopy has lower soil temperatures and higher soil nitrogen levels. Therefore, growth, reproduction, and recruitment of S. sempervirens are facilitated.

In a study of the interactions of competition and physical environmental factors, Hacker and Bertness (1999) found that physical conditions in the lower middle salt marshes of Rhode Island are so harsh as to eliminate interactions of S. sempervirens with other species. All S. sempervirens clones transplanted into this habitat died with or without the co-occurrence of the dominant species Juncus gerardii. In the upper middle marsh J. gerardii facilitates the growth and reproduction of S. sempervirens. Therefore, S. sempervirens is capable of competitive tolerance in the higher elevations of a salt marsh (Hacker and Bertness, 1999).

RESPONSE TO WATER LEVELS

Oosting and Billings (1942) indicated that optimal growth of S. sempervirens occurs in habitats with increasing distance from the water table. Solidago sempervirens is a dune species in Massachusetts and grows poorly in inundated conditions (Shumway and Banks, 2001). Plants are abundant in dunes and are rare in J. gerardii depressions and in cranberry swales (Shumway and Banks, 2001).

ECOMONIC IMPORTANCE

Solidago sempervirens has limited value in coastal protection. It is common in protective foredunes in New Jersey, but cover values only range from 1.4% to 2.3% of total foliar cover (Nordstrom et al., 2007). Seaside goldenrod is subject to moderate damage due to pedestrian traffic in coastal dune habitats in Massachusetts (McDonnell, 1981).

Wildlife Values

Seaside goldenrod has several wildlife values. It serves as a source of nectar for bees and migrating butterflies (Stutzenbaker, 1999), and has been recommended for cultivation in butterfly gardens (Richardson and King, 2011).

Plant communities where S. sempervirens occurs are important concealment and nesting sites for birds. Craik and Titman (2009) found that red-breasted mergansers (Mergus serrator) and the common tern (Sterna hirundo) nest in this habitat in New Brunswick, Canada. In New York, Safina and Burger (1983) found that Solidago sempervirens and other species provide nesting habitat for willets (Catoptrophorus semipalmatus), killdeer (Chradrus vociferous), piping plovers (C. melodus), black skimmers (Rynchops niger), common terns, and roseate terns (Sterna dougalli).

Medicinal Uses

Folk literature has some reports of medicinal uses for various species of Solidago, but none is listed for S. sempervirens and its subspecies. All species of Solidago are insect pollinated. Pollen of the genus Solidago does not cause respiratory allergies.

Potential Biological Control Agents

Cheplick and Aliota (2009) found that densities and plant heights of weedy, annual pioneer grasses shaded by S. sempervirens were significantly reduced. Triplasis purpurea, Cenchrus tribuloides, and D. sanguinalis were affected, but the annual, prostrate, broad-leaved dicot, Mollugo verticillata, was not. A diterpene, sempervirenic acid, has been isolated from S. sempervirens (Purushothaman et al., 1983). Terpenes are unsaturated hydrocarbons in most oleoresins and essential oils in plants. Exudates of sempervirenic acid from shoots, roots, and rhizomes of S. sempervirens clones may be involved in allelopathic effects on low-growing annual grasses. However, this hypothesis has not been tested.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Glennis and David Lonard for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript. Dr. Alfred Richardson and Ken King provided digital images of Solidago sempervirens subsp. mexicanus. Dr. Eric Lamont kindly verified our identification of S. semperivirens. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers who helped improve the manuscript.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. J. Ancheta S.B. Heardand J.W. Lyons 2010. Impacts of salinity and simulated herbivory on survival and reproduction of the threatened Gulf of St. Lawrence aster Symphyotrichum laurentianum. Botany, 88(8), 737–744. Google Scholar

  2. L.C. Andersonand L.L. Alexander 1985. The vegetation of Dog Island, Florida. Florida Scientist, 48(4), 232–251. Google Scholar

  3. J.M. Arnold I.C.T. Nisbetand R. Veit 2011. Assessing aural and visual cueing as tools for seabird management. Journal of Wildlife Management, 75(3), 495–500. Google Scholar

  4. T.L. Baptistaand S.W. Shumway 1998. A comparison of the seed banks of sand dunes with different disturbance histories on Cape Cod National Seashore. Rhodora, 100(903), 298–313. Google Scholar

  5. J. Brauerand M.A. Geber 2002. Population differentiation in the range expansion of a native maritime plant, Solidago sempervirens L. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 163(1), 141–150. Google Scholar

  6. S.H. Brownand K. Cooprider 2010. Solidago sempervirens. Seaside Goldenrod; Salt-Marsh Goldenrod. Lee County, Florida: University of Florida IFAS Extension, 4p.  http://lee.ifas.ufl.edu/Hort/GardenPubsAZ/Seaside_goldenrod.pdfGoogle Scholar

  7. R.N. Buchsbaum J. Catena E. Hutchinsand M.J. James-Pirri 2006. Changes in salt marsh vegetation, Phragmites australis, and nekton in response to increased tidal flushing in a New England salt marsh. Wetlands, 26(2), 544–557. Google Scholar

  8. R.J. Carticaand J.A. Quinn 1980. Responses of populations of Solidago sempervirens (Compositae) to salt spray across a barrier beach. American Journal of Botany, 67(8), 1236–1242. Google Scholar

  9. R.J. Carticaand J.A. Quinn 1982. Resource allocation and fecundity of populations of Solidago sempervirens along a coastal dune gradient. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 109(3), 299–305. Google Scholar

  10. P.M. Catling B. Freedmanand Z. Lucas 1984. The vegetation and phytogeography of Sable Island, Nova Scotia. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science, 34(3,4), 182–249. Google Scholar

  11. G.P. Cheplickand M. Aliotta 2009. The abundance and size of annual herbs in a coastal beach community is related to their distance from seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens). Journal of the Torrey Botancial Society, 136(1), 102–109. Google Scholar

  12. C.A. Clampitt 1991. The upland plant communities of Seashore State Park, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science, 42(4), 419–435. Google Scholar

  13. D.S. Correlland H.B. Correll 1972. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southwestern United States. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, p. Google Scholar

  14. R.P. Courtemanche Jr H.W. Hesterand I.A. Mendelssohn 1999. Recovery of a Louisiana barrier island marsh plant community following extensive hurricane-induced overwash. Journal of Coastal Research, 15(4), 872–883. Google Scholar

  15. S.R. Craikand R.D. Titman 2009. Nesting ecology of Red-breasted Mergansers in a common tern colony in eastern New Brunswick. Waterbirds, 32(2), 282–292. Google Scholar

  16. C.M. Crain L.K. Albertsonand M.D. Bertness 2008. Secondary succession dynamics in estuarine marshes across landscape-scale salinity gradients. Ecology, 89(10), 2889–2899. Google Scholar

  17. C.M. Crain B.R. Silliman S.L. Bertnessand M.D. Bertness 2004. Physical and biotic drivers of plant distribution across estuarine salinity gradients. Ecology, 85(9), 2539–2549. Google Scholar

  18. D.J. Disraeli 1984. The effect of sand deposits on the growth and morphology of Ammophila breviligulata. Journal of Ecology, 92(1), 145–154. Google Scholar

  19. D.A. Dunlopand G.E. Crow 1985. The vegetation and flora of the Seabrook Dunes with special reference to rare plants. Rhodora, 87(852), 471–476. Google Scholar

  20. J.G. Ehrenfeld 1990. Dynamics and processes of barrier island vegetation. Reviews in Aquatic Sciences, 2(3,4), 437–480. Google Scholar

  21. L.N. Eleuterius 1972. The marshes of Mississippi. Castanea, 37(3), 153–168. Google Scholar

  22. L.N. Eleuteriusand J.D. Caldwell 1984. The flowering phenology of tidal marsh plants in Mississippi. Castanea, 49(4), 172–179. Google Scholar

  23. L.N. Eleuteriusand S. McDaniel 1978. The salt marsh flora of Mississippi. Castanea, 43(2), 86–95. Google Scholar

  24. M.L. Fernald 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th edition. New York: American Book Company, p. Google Scholar

  25. S.B. Fleenorand S.W. Taber 2009. Plants of Central Texas Wetlands. Lubbock, Texas: Texas Tech University Press, p. Google Scholar

  26. Flora of North America Editorial Committee, 2006. Magnoliophyta: Asteridae (In Part): Asteraceae (Part 2), Volume 20. New York: Oxford University Press, p. Google Scholar

  27. B. Frankowski F. Hernandez T. Okonand S. Bongiorno 1977. Increase in abundance of Solidago sempervirens on a diked salt marsh in southwestern Connecticut. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 104(4), 383–385. Google Scholar

  28. K.N. Gandhiand R.D. Thomas 1989. Asteraceae of Louisiana. Sida, Botanical Miscellany series. Volume 4. Dallas, Texas: SMU Herbarium/BRIT, p. Google Scholar

  29. K.B. Gedan C.M. Crainand M.D. Bertness 2009. Small mammal herbivore control of secondary succession in New England tidal marshes. Ecology, 90(2), 430–440. Google Scholar

  30. H.A. Gleasonand A. Cronquist 1963. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., p. Google Scholar

  31. R.K. Godfreyand J.W. Wooten 1981. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of the Southeastern United States: Dicotyledons. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, p. Google Scholar

  32. R.H. Goodwin 1937. Studies on the seedling development of Solidago rugosa Mill., S. sempervirens L. and the reciprocal hybrids between them. American Journal of Botany, 24(9), 627–640. Google Scholar

  33. R.H. Goodwin 1944. The inheritance of flowering time in a short-day species, Solidago sempervirens L. Genetics, 29(6), 503–519. Google Scholar

  34. S.D. Hackerand M.D. Bertness 1999. Experimental evidence for factors maintaining plant species diversity in a New England salt marsh. Ecology, 80(6), 2064–2073. Google Scholar

  35. S.K. Harris 1958. A new color form of Solidago sempervirens. Rhodora, 60(717), 261–262. Google Scholar

  36. S.R. Hill 1986. An annotated checklist of the vascular flora of Assateague Island (Maryland and Virginia). Castanea, 51(4), 265–305. Google Scholar

  37. C.-K. Hoand S.C. Pennings 2013. Preference and performance in plant–herbivore interactions across latitude—A study in U.S. Atlantic salt marshes. Plos One, 8(3), 1–11. Google Scholar

  38. D.J. Innesand L.A. Hermanutz 1988. The mating system and genetic structure in a disjunct population of the seaside goldenrod Solidago sempervirens L. (Asteraceae). Heredity, 61(3), 447–454. Google Scholar

  39. F.W Judd R.I. Lonardand S.L. Sides 1977. The vegetation of South Padre Island, Texas in relation to topography. Southwestern Naturalist, 22(1), 31–48. Google Scholar

  40. L.H. Klotz 1986. The vascular flora of Wallops Island and Wallops Mainland, Virginia. Castanea, 51(4), 306–326. Google Scholar

  41. R.E. Koskeand W.L. Halvorson 1981. Ecological studies of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in a barrier sand dune. Canadian Journal of Botany, 59(8), 1413–1422. Google Scholar

  42. E.E. Lamont 1994. Rediscovery of Solidago sempervirens var. mexicana (Asteraceae) in New York, with notes on its taxonomic history. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 121(3), 292–294. Google Scholar

  43. E.E. Lamontand R. Stalter 1991. The vascular flora of Orient Beach State Park, Long Island, New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 118(4), 459–468. Google Scholar

  44. F.C. Lanningand L.N. Eleuterius 1983. Silica and ash in tissues of some coastal plants. Annals of Botany, 51(6), 835–850. Google Scholar

  45. P.C. Lee 1993. The effect of seed dispersal limitations on the spatial distribution of a gap species, seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens). Canadian Journal of Botany, 71(7), 978–984. Google Scholar

  46. P.C. Lee 1995. The effect of gap dynamics on the size and spatial structure of Solidago sempervirens on primary coastal dunes. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6(6), 837–846. Google Scholar

  47. R.L. Lehman R. O'Brienand T. White 2005. Plants of the Texas Coastal Bend. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press, p. Google Scholar

  48. R.I. Lonardand F.W. Judd 1980. Phytogeography of South Padre Island, Texas. Southwestern Naturalist, 25(3), 313–322. Google Scholar

  49. R.I. Lonardand F.W. Judd 1989. Phenology of native angiosperms of South Padre Island, Texas. In: T. Braggand J. Stubbendieck (eds.), Proceedings of the North American Prairie Conference. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Printing, pp. 217–222. Google Scholar

  50. R.I. Lonard F.W. Judd J.H. Everitt D.E. Escobar M.A. Alaniz I. Cavazos IIIand M.R. Davis 1999. Vegetative change on South Padre Island, Texas, over twenty years and evaluation of multispectral videography in determining vegetative cover and species identity. Southwestern Naturalist, 44(3), 261–271. Google Scholar

  51. R.I. Lonard F.W. Judd J.H. Everitt D.E. Escobarand M.R. Davis 1991. Roadside associated disturbance on coastal dunes. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Coastal & Ocean Management (Long Beach, California, ASCE), pp. 2823–2836. Google Scholar

  52. D.J. Mabberley 1997. The Plant Book, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. Google Scholar

  53. W.E. Martin 1959. The vegetation of Island Beach State Park, New Jersey. Ecological Monographs, 29(1), 1–46. Google Scholar

  54. W.A. McAvoyand K.A. Bennett 2001. The Flora of Delaware. An Annotated Checklist. Delaware Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Document No. 40-05/01/01/01, p. Google Scholar

  55. M.J. McDonnell 1981. Trampling effects on coastal dune vegetation in the Parker River National Wildlife Refuge, Masachusetts, USA. Biological Conservation, 2(4), 289–301. Google Scholar

  56. T.E. Minchinton J.C. Simpsonand M.D. Bertness 2006. Mechanisms of exclusion of native coastal marsh plants by an invasive grass. Journal of Ecology, 94(2), 342–354. Google Scholar

  57. NYFA (New York Flora Association), 2014. New York Flora Atlas: Solidago × erskinei.  http://newyork.plantatlas.usf.edu/Plant.aspx?id=230Google Scholar

  58. K.F. Nordstrom J.M. Hartman A.L. Freestone M. Wongand N.L. Jackson 2007. Changes in topography and vegetation near gaps in a protective foredune. Ocean & Coastal Management, 50(11,12), 945–959. Google Scholar

  59. H.J. Oostingand W.D. Billings 1942. Factors effecting vegetational zonation on coastal dunes. Ecology, 23(2), 131–142. Google Scholar

  60. C. Oravaand D.R. Drake 1997. Effects of salinity on germination and growth of Solidago sempervirens var. mexicana (L.) Fern. Castanea, 62(4), 272–277. Google Scholar

  61. K.K. Purushothaman A. Sarada A. Sarawathyand J.D. Connolly 1983. Sempervirenic acid, a diterpene acid from Solidago sempervirens. Phytochemistry, 22(4), 1042–1043. Google Scholar

  62. A.E. Radford H.E. Ahlesand C.R. Bell 1968. Manual of the Vascular Plants of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, p. Google Scholar

  63. A.M. Rhoadsand T.A. Block 2007. The Plants of Pennsylvania: An Illustrated Manual. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, p. Google Scholar

  64. A. Richardsonand K. King 2011. Plants of Deep South Texas: A Field Guide to the Woody & Flowering Species. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press, p. Google Scholar

  65. H.N. Ridley 1930. The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World. Kent, United Kingdom: L. Reeve and Co., p. Google Scholar

  66. C. Safinaand J. Burger 1983. Effects of human disturbance on reproductive success in the black skimmer. Condor, 85(2), 164–171. Google Scholar

  67. C.S. Salgadoand S.C. Pennings 2005. Latitudinal variation in palatability of salt-marsh plants: Are differences constitutive? Ecology, 86(6), 1571–1579. Google Scholar

  68. J.C. Semple 2003. New names and combinations in goldenrods, Solidago (Asteraceae): Astereae. Sida, 29(4), 1605–1616. Google Scholar

  69. J.C. Semple G.S. Ringuis C. Leederand G. Morton 1984. Chromosome numbers of goldenrods, Euthamia and Solidago (Compositae: Astereae). II. Additional counts with comments on cytogeography. Brittonia, 36(3), 280–292. Google Scholar

  70. C.M. Sheahan 2012. Release brochure for seaside goldenrod Monarch germplasm (Solidago sempervirens). Cape May, New Jersey: USDA-NRCS, Cape May Plant Materials Center, p. Google Scholar

  71. S.W. Shumway 2000. Facilitative effects of a sand dune shrub on species growing beneath the shrub canopy. Oecologia, 124(1), 138–148. Google Scholar

  72. S.W. Shumwayand C.R. Banks 2001. Species distribution in interdunal swale communities: The effects of soil waterlogging. American Midland Naturalist, 145(1), 137–146. Google Scholar

  73. S.W. Shumwayand M.D. Bertness 1992. Salt stress limitation of seedling recruitment in a salt marsh plant community. Oecologia, 92(4), 490–497. Google Scholar

  74. R. Stalter 1968. An Ecological Study of a South Carolina Salt Marsh. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina, Ph.D. thesis, p. Google Scholar

  75. R. Stalter 1974. Vegetation in coastal dunes of South Carolina. Castanea, 39(1), 95–103. Google Scholar

  76. R. Stalter 1993. Barrier Island Botany. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Publishers, p. Google Scholar

  77. R. Stalter 2004. The flora of the High Line, New York City, New York. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 131(4), 387–393. Google Scholar

  78. R. Stalterand W.T. Batson 1973. Seed viability in salt marsh taxa, Georgetown County, South Carolina. Castanea, 38(1), 109–110. Google Scholar

  79. R. Stalterand E.E. Lamont 1993. The vascular flora of Fort Sumter and Fort Moultrie, South Carolina, one year after Hurricane Hugo. Castanea, 36(3), 167–174. Google Scholar

  80. R. Stalterand E.E. Lamont 1997. Flora of North Carolina's Outer Banks, Ocracoke Island to Virginia. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 124(1), 71–88. Google Scholar

  81. R. Stalterand E.E. Lamont 2000. Vascular flora of Fisherman Island, Virginia. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 127(4), 324–332. Google Scholar

  82. R. Stalterand E.E. Lamont 2002. Vascular flora of Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, Long Island, New York. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 129(4), 346–358. Google Scholar

  83. R. Stalterand E.E. Lamont 2006. The historical and extant flora of Sable Island, Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 133(2), 362–374. Google Scholar

  84. R. Stalter J. Tamory P. Lynchand B. Lockwood 1999. The vascular flora of Biscayne National Park, Florida. Sida, 18(4), 1207–1226. Google Scholar

  85. C.D. Stutzenbaker 1999. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of the Western Gulf Coast. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, p. Google Scholar

  86. P. Sutton R. Meyerand R. Stalter 1990. The vascular plants of Cape May Point State Park, Cape May County, New Jersey. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 117(3), 294–300. Google Scholar

  87. F. Swinkand G. Wilhelm 1994. Plants of the Chicago Region, 4th edition. Indianapolis, Indiana: Indiana Academy of Science, p. Google Scholar

  88. D. Thannheiser 1984. The Coastal Vegetation of Eastern Canada. Occasional Papers in Biology, No. 8. St. John's, Newfoundland: Memorial Museum of Newfoundland, 212p. Google Scholar

  89. A.G. van der Valk 1974. Environmental factors controlling the distribution of forbs on coastal foredunes in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Canadian Journal of Botany, 52(5), 1057–1073. Google Scholar

  90. A.M. Wieczorekand M.A. Geber 2002. Microsatellite loci for studies of population differentiation and range expansion in Solidago sempervirens L. (Asteraceae). Molecular Ecology Notes, 2(4), 554–556. Google Scholar

  91. A.S. Wozniak C.T. Roman S.M. Wainright R.A. McKinneyand M-J. James-Pirri 2006. Monitoring food web changes in tide-restored salt marshes: A carbon stable isotope approach. Estuaries and Coasts, 29(4), 568–579. Google Scholar

  92. R.P. Wunderlinand B.F. Hansen 2001. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida, 3rd edition. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida, p. Google Scholar

Robert I. Lonard, Frank W. Judd, and Richard Stalter "The Biological Flora of Coastal Dunes and Wetlands: Solidago sempervirens L. and Solidago sempervirens L. subsp. mexicana (L.) Semple," Journal of Coastal Research 31(6), (1 November 2015). https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00261.1
Received: 24 December 2014; Accepted: 19 January 2015; Published: 1 November 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top