Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2002 Is The Zanzibar Leopard (Panthera pardus adersi) Extinct
Helle V. Goldman, Martin T. Walsh
Author Affiliations +

The Zanzibar leopard, Panthera pardus adersi (Pocock, 1932), is a little-known island endemic assumed by some authorities to be extinct. In 1996 a survey of local practices, beliefs and knowledge about the leopard was conducted on Unguja Island. Data were collected through interviews with Zanzibaris in villages across the island and from official documents (records of the National Hunters). In total 52 villagers, over half of whom were former or current part-time hunters, were interviewed. The interviews yielded compelling indications for an extant population of leopards: interviews included reports of leopard sightings for every year between 1990 to 1996. Combining this with National Hunters' records, which documented killed leopards in each year from 1985 to 1995, we conclude that the species was probably still to be found on the island as of 1996. However, a subsequent effort undertaken by other researchers and involving camera traps, audio playbacks and searches for leopard sign failed to yield physical evidence of leopards.

IS THE ZANZIBAR LEOPARD (PANTHERA PARDUS ADERSI) EXTINCT?Helle V. Goldman⟨sup⟩1⟨/sup⟩Jozani-Chwaka Bay Conservation ProjectCommission for Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 3526, Zanzibar, Tanzaniagoldman@npolar.noMartin T. WalshNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich,Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4TB, U.K.kisutu@hotmail.comABSTRACTThe Zanzibar leopard, Panthera pardus adersi (Pocock, 1932), is a little-known island endemic assumed by some authorities to be extinct. In 1996 a survey of local practices, beliefs and knowledge about the leopard was conducted on Unguja Island. Data were collected through interviews with Zanzibaris in villages across the island and from official documents (records of the National Hunters). In total 52 villagers, over half of whom were former or current part-time hunters, were interviewed. The interviews yielded compelling indications for an extant population of leopards: interviews included reports of leopard sightings for every year between 1990 to 1996. Combining this with National Hunters' records, which documented killed leopards in each year from 1985 to 1995, we conclude that the species was probably still to be found on the island as of 1996. However, a subsequent effort undertaken by other researchers and involving camera traps, audio playbacks and searches for leopard sign failed to yield physical evidence of leopards.INTRODUCTIONWith recognition of the decisive role local people often play in the success of conservation initiatives, studies of local attitudes toward wildlife, protected areas, and conservation programmes have come to constitute an important part of the literature (e.g., Infield, 1988; Hackel, 1990; Newmark et al., 1993; Reading & Kellert, 1993; Akama et al., 1995; Nepal & Weber, 1995; Badola, 1998; Bjerke et al., 1998; Hill, 1998; Mehta & Kellert, 1998). Local perceptions of species, such as large felids, that pose direct threats to people and livestock are often particularly charged (Oli et al., 1994; Saberwal et al., 1994; Kellert et al., 1996; Mishra 1997).⟨sup⟩1⟨/sup⟩ Current address: Norwegian Polar Institute, Polar Environmental Centre, N-9296 Tromsø, Norway.In 1996, the Jozani-Chwaka Bay Conservation Project engaged the authors (both anthropologists) to survey beliefs and practices concerning leopards on Unguja Island. The managers of this integrated conservation and development project were considering whether to include a leopard conservation initiative in their efforts to protect several endemic wildlife species and subspecies. Due to morphological differences (its small size and distinctive coat pattern), the Zanzibar leopard is recognised as a distinct subspecies, Panthera pardus adersi (Pocock, 1932; also Swynnerton & Hayman, 1951; Kingdon, 1977, 1989; Pakenham, 1984), but little is known about this felid.At the time of the study, some sources in the literature had assumed the Zanzibar leopard was extinct (e.g., Miththapala et al., 1996; Nowell & Jackson, 1996). However, recent unpublished reports (Archer, 1994; Marshall, 1994; Selkow, 1995) indicated that Zanzibaris believed leopards were still to be found. Non-native residents and researchers had not been able to confirm the presence of the Zanzibar leopard, although pugmarks thought to be leopard were encountered in 1996 (A. Archer, R. Wild, pers. comm.). The last outside researcher to claim an actual sighting of the leopard was Swai (1983 and pers. comm.).The aim of this study was to investigate people's knowledge of leopards, their attitudes toward the species, and whether there were indications that leopards were still extant on the island. This paper reports the findings which relate most directly to the question of whether leopards survived on Unguja at the time of the survey in 1996.BackgroundIn 1919 British authorities in the Zanzibar Protectorate prohibited the hunting of leopards by listing them in the Wild Animals Protection Decree. However, as the human population grew, attacks upon people and livestock increased. In 1950, the government lifted the total ban on leopard hunting by issuing the Zanzibar Leopard Exception Order.After the Zanzibar revolution of 1964, the newly independent government sponsored a joint leopard-eradication and witch-purging campaign. Since at least colonial times, it has been believed that witches exercise their magical control over leopards to harass other people. Leopards thought to be controlled in this way are described as being "kept". Harming, or even just catching sight of, a witch's leopard was, and is, believed to result in a range of grave afflictions. The post-revolution leopard/witch eradication programme, known as the Kitanzi Campaign, gradually petered out, but widespread animosity towards leopards and their alleged "keepers" survives to the present day.Today, the government supports leopard hunting by subsidising the National Hunters. This is a diverse group of men, mainly townsmen engaged in various occupations, who organise hunts in rural Unguja on the officially-sanctioned pretext of eliminating agricultural pests. The Zanzibar leopard is counted among these "vermin". The government pays for their transport and supplies, but National Hunters are not directly paid for their participation. They are, however, permitted to sell the products of what they succeed in killing.Zanzibar enjoys a semi-autonomous status within Tanzania. Tanzania is party to CITES- endorsed hunting quotas for leopards and other endangered or vulnerable species. Although the conditions of international agreements made by Tanzania theoretically apply equally to Zanzibar, they are not enforced, and the mainland wildlife authorities do not monitor or interfere in Zanzibari affairs.Study AreaThe main island of Zanzibar, Unguja (1,600 km⟨sup⟩2⟨/sup⟩) (figure 1), lies approximately 6° south of the equator and 40 km from mainland Tanzania. The deeper soil zone of the western part of the island formerly supported moist lowland forest, while a mosaic of thicket and dry lowland forest covered the coral rag zone of the east and much of the south. With an estimated population of 524,000 people, Unguja then had a mean rural population density of approximately 171 persons per km⟨sup⟩2⟨/sup⟩ (range 0-300) (figures based on 1988 census results and 1991 estimates; United Republic of Tanzania, 1991; Zanzibar Revolutionary Government, 1992). Rural Zanzibaris subsist from various combinations of cultivation, small-scale livestock husbandry, fishing, and charcoal and lime production. Hunting also contributes to some livelihoods.Much of the island's wildlife inhabits the patches of intact or degraded thicket in the eastern part of the island, as well as the Jozani Reserve (25 km⟨sup⟩2⟨/sup⟩), which encompasses Unguja's only remaining older-growth forest (Robins, 1976; Williams et al., 1998). The larger species of mammals in Zanzibar include Aders' duiker Cephalophus adersi, Zanzibar blue duiker Cephalophus monticola sundevalli, suni Neotragus moschatus moschatus, bushpig Potamochoerus porcus, Zanzibar red colobus Procolobus kirkii, Sykes' monkey Cercopithecus mitis, African civet Viverra civetta schwarzi, and a newly identified servaline genet, Genetta servalina archeri (Van Rompaey & Colyn, 1998).METHODSUndertaken in July 1996, the research consisted primarily of semi-structured interviews in Swahili with villagers and a review of National Hunt records. Nineteen villages located in the southern and eastern three-quarters of the island were visited. These areas contain the largest tracts of remaining forest and thicket. Recent reports and interviews with Forestry officials and National Hunters suggested that leopards were concentrated here.In some cases, the Zanzibari members of the research team knew someone in the village who might be willing to talk about leopards. Other interviewees were encountered by chance. Most interviewees were men over 30 years old (table 1). This bias was not considered a disadvantage as men partake in hunting and have more direct knowledge of wildlife. Twenty- eight of the 52 villagers interviewed were current or former part-time hunters. Most preferred to hunt alone, but some participated in group hunts organised at the village level.Table 1. Age and sex characteristics of villagers interviewed in a survey of beliefs and knowledge of the leopard (Panthera pardus), Unguja Island, Tanzania, 1996.Age (years)⟨sup⟩1⟨/sup⟩⟨1818-3031 -50⟩50TotalMale12⟨sup⟩2⟨/sup⟩15⟨sup⟩3⟨/sup⟩26⟨sup⟩4⟨/sup⟩44Female3148⟨sup⟩1⟨/sup⟩ Some ages are estimates.⟨sup⟩2⟨/sup⟩ One was a part-time hunter.⟨sup⟩3⟨/sup⟩ Ten were current or former part-time hunters.⟨sup⟩4⟨/sup⟩ Seventeen were current or former part-time hunters.Conducting semi-structured and open-ended interviews, we sought answers to the questions listed in table 2. Although all interviews were voluntary, many villagers were uneasy discussing leopards, fearing that a willingness to do so might result in them becoming targets of "leopard keepers" or would be construed as evidence that they themselves were "leopard keepers". Probably increasing their reserve was the fact that the researchers were affiliated with the government (the Commission for Natural Resources).The second source of information was the records of the National Hunters. Although National Hunters are not closely monitored by the government, they keep records of their activities in the form of individual hunt reports and annual summaries. These are also supposed to include the results of village hunts. The records are stored in Zanzibar's Department of Regional Administration.Table 2. Questions guiding semi-structured interviews in a survey of beliefs and knowledge of the leopard (Panthera pardus,), Unguja Island, Tanzania, 1996.1) Did the interviewee engage in hunting, currently or formerly2) Did the interviewee believe there were leopards in the area he/she lived?3) Did the interviewee believe there were more or fewer leopards now compared to the past?4) What did the interviewee believe was the cause of any perceived increase or decrease?5) Had other wildlife increased, decreased, or remained stable in number? Why?6) Had the interviewee ever encountered signs of leopards, such as faeces or pugmarks, or ever heard leopard calls?7) Had the interviewee ever seen a leopard? If so, when, where, and under what circumstances?8) If the interviewee was or had been a hunter, had he ever killed a leopard? When, where, and under what circumstances?9) What could the interviewee tell us about the appearance and behaviour of leopards?10) Did the interviewee look positively or negatively on leopards?11) Did the interviewee believe that leopards should be protected?RESULTSInterviewsInterviewees varied widely in their level of contact with, and knowledge about, leopards and other wildlife. Informants' descriptions of the physical appearance of leopards-their size and body shape, the form of their paws, colouration and coat patterning, and facial features-all matched what we know of leopard morphology. This accuracy is partly accounted for by the sizeable proportion (54 %) of informants who reported having seen leopards at close quarters, including dead leopards that the informants themselves had directly participated in killing or which had been hunted by Kitanzi agents or National Hunters, and live leopards trapped during the Protectorate period or the Kitanzi era. Predictably, it was with respect to less directly observable aspects of leopard natural history, e.g. gestation length and longevity, that the accuracy of the information became more variable. Some informants offered good descriptions of behaviours which probably few Zanzibaris have directly observed (or seen on television), e.g. males' scent-marking behaviour and the habit of hauling kills into trees where these are available, suggesting that the accurate observations of some individuals have entered into the body of general Zanzibari knowledge. The scientific acuracy of some of the interviewees' information about leopards-such as crabs forming part of the diet of leopards whose ranges include mangrove forests-seems plausible but requires further work to confirm or discount.All interviewees believed that there were still leopards on Unguja, but that they had decreased in numbers over the years, as had other wildlife. Interviewees attributed the reduction in leopards to the Kitanzi campaign and subsequent hunting pressure, combined with a slow reproduction rate and high cub mortality. Only one informant (2 %) offered habitat reduction and degradation as reasons for the decline in leopards.Though interviewees were preponderantly negative in their attitudes toward leopards and a possible leopard conservation programme, 14 informants (27 %) did not support the complete extermination of leopards. These were mostly younger interviewees. Ten of them were of the opinion that if leopards could be securely contained, as in a zoo or fenced park, and thus kept from harming people and livestock, then the conservation of a small number leopards might generate much-needed tourism income in rural areas. It is widely known that thousands of tourists visit Jozani Forest annually to see Zanzibar red colobus monkeys. Generally, however, witchcraft levels and leopard numbers were perceived to have dropped in tandem during the last three to four decades and informants had no wish for these to rise to former levels.Thirteen part-time hunters (25 % of informants) disclosed having killed leopards at some time in their lives. Most of these leopard kills reportedly occurred before 1990; some were in connection with pre-Independence British hunting parties or with Kitanzi campaign or National Hunter activities. One man reported having shot a leopard in 1990 and then another in 1994 (table 3).The interviewees related numerous leopard sightings (table 3). Leopards were reported to have been seen during each of the years spanning 1990 and 1996. There were seven reported sightings for 1996. Five (10 %) interviewees reported indirect evidence of leopards (table 3). This included pugmarks and scat thought to belong to leopards, as well as attacks on domestic animals attributed by the interviewees to leopards.National Hunt recordsAccording to records of the National Hunters, leopards were reportedly killed in every year from 1985 through 1995. The records for this last year on file, which showed only one leopard killed, were recognised to be incomplete when we reviewed them in 1996 (table 4). As recently as 1994, 12 or 13 leopards had reportedly been taken. The figures in the annual summaries were sometimes higher than the totals in the individual hunt reports, suggesting that individual hunt reports were produced or filed somewhat sporadically.DISCUSSIONTaken at face value, these findings support the conclusion that leopards were probably still present on Unguja at the time of the study. Leopards are probably the most versatile of the big cats, able to adjust their behaviour and diet to local conditions and known to survive in settled areas, including the suburbs of Nairobi (Seidensticker, 1991). Hamilton (1986) reported leopards in an area of western Kenya with a human population density of 150/km⟨sup⟩2⟨/sup⟩ (about the same as Unguja), large livestock numbers, and little undisturbed habitat or natural prey.Table 3. Summary of interviewees' reports of leopards (Panthera pardus) on Unguja Island, Tanzania (1990 to 1996).VillageThis studySelkow (1995)Marshall (1994)Archer (1994)Nungwi1990 I⟨sup⟩1⟨/sup⟩1991 S⟨sup⟩2⟨/sup⟩Upenja1993 I1994 IKiwengwa1993 S1996 SPongwe1995 SNdudu1995 S1996 SUroa1996 S1996 SChwaka1996 IDimani1996 S⟨sup⟩3⟨/sup⟩1996 SUnguja Ukuu1996 S1994 S1996 IPete1991 S1992 I1993 S1996 SKitogani1991 S⟨sup⟩4⟨/sup⟩1991 S1996 I1994 S1994 IMuungoni1992 S1993 S1996 ICharawe1992 S1992 S1993 I1994 I1994 SUkongoroni1993 S1994 IDongwe1990 S1994 S1991 S1992 S1993 S1994 SBwejuu1991 S1994 S1994 IPaje1990 S⟨sup⟩5⟨/sup⟩1990 S1992 S1993 S1994 S1994 IMuyuni C1992 SKizimkazi1996 SMakunduchi1990 S1994 I1990 S⟨sup⟩6⟨/sup⟩1994 S⟨sup⟩7⟨/sup⟩⟨sup⟩1⟨/sup⟩ I = report of indirect indication of leopard. The latter includes observations of pugmarks and scat interpreted as belonging to leopards. It also includes hearing calls thought to come from leopards. Finally, it includes domestic animals (cattle, donkeys, goats, chickens, and dogs) thought to have been injured or killed by leopards. Some years are approximate.⟨sup⟩2⟨/sup⟩ S = reported sighting of leopard. Some years are approximate.⟨sup⟩3⟨/sup⟩ Part-time hunter reported that a groups of youths had found three leopard cubs; these were fed to their dogs.⟨sup⟩4⟨/sup⟩ A youth reportedly attacked.⟨sup⟩5⟨/sup⟩ A man reportedly attacked.⟨sup⟩6⟨/sup⟩ Part-time hunter reported killing a leopard.⟨sup⟩7⟨/sup⟩ Same interviewee as above reported killing another leopard.Table 4. Summary of leopards (Panthera pardus) killed, 1985 through 1995, as given in National Hunters documents. See Goldman & Walsh (1997), for details. Copies of this report are available from the authors.YearNumber from annual summariesNumber tallied up from individual hunt reports1995⟨sup⟩1⟨/sup⟩11199413121993131119921291991181719901210198915111988112198755198644198577Total11189⟨sup⟩1⟨/sup⟩ Records for this year (the year before our study) were not complete.Judging the reliability of these results presents a challenge. Some reported leopard sightings may have been sightings of other animals, such as civets or servaline genets. Villagers' reports of pawprints, faeces, and leopard calls may also have been mistaken. Indigenous people's knowledge of their natural environment has achieved recognition as extremely intimate and is now prized by Western scientists as valuable (see e.g., Alvard, 1993; Poizat & Baran, 1997; Stander et al., 1997; Ferguson et al., 1998). Yet indigenous knowledge is not infallible, and the accuracy of information about wildlife and other aspects of the natural environment varies among people depending on their degree of dependence on it and a range of other factors (Walsh & Harvey, 1997).Hunters' reports of having killed (vs. merely seen) leopards are not easily dismissed. Misidentification of a carcass that a hunter actually handles seems highly improbable. Several studies have relied at least in part on interviews to determine the quantities and types of game hunted and consumed (e.g., Ayres et al., 1991; Silva & Strahl, 1991; Alvard, 1993; Alvard et al., 1997). The possibility cannot be ruled out that hunters (and other informants) deliberately misinformed us, perhaps to hold our attention and thereby to gain prestige in their communities or to foster reputations as brave hunters. However, in light of what we know about people's deep-seated fear of "leopard-keeping witches", it is equally likely that villagers under-reported leopard kills (and sightings).The internal contradictions of the National Hunt records called into question their accuracy. Nonetheless, these records do strongly support the thesis that in the mid-1990s there was still an extant leopard population.The results of this study are intriguing because, to our knowledge, no foreign researcher has come upon direct, irrefutable evidence of Zanzibar leopards in recent years. During the course of the study, we were shown pieces of leopard skin purportedly of local provenance, and received reliable reports from two foreign residents and a Zanzibari museum advisor who were offered the purchase of leopard skins on the island. However, the local provenance of these partial and whole skins could not be confirmed.For about 3 weeks in 1997, two wildlife researchers sought firm evidence for the leopards' continued existence, but failed despite deploying two automatic "camera traps", playing audio-taped leopard calls, and searching for pugmarks and other sign (Stuart & Stuart, 1997). It is difficult to reconcile these results with our own. That the only wildlife represented in the 80 photographs produced by the camera trapping effort were African civet and crested guinea fowl (Guttera pucherani) may be attributed to its relatively short duration, the small number of camera kits deployed and their locations in the same area of forest, and the quality of the equipment.In the years following the study reported here, reports of leopard sightings continued to come in from rural Unguja, particularly the Jozani area. Further fieldwork is required to determine whether there are still leopards on Unguja. Two fruitful avenues are more extensive camera trapping and direct observations of National Hunts. If a leopard population is confirmed, every effort should be made to protect these unique felids in their natural habitat (not in captivity). The outlines of a conservation programme, focussing on education, legislation and enforcement, are on file with the conservation authorities in what is now the Department of Commercial Crops, Fruits and Forestry.Because of the complexity of this case and the difficult questions it raises, we believe the results of this study may prove interesting and useful to conservation biologists, and to scientists interested in species which play roles in complex indigenous belief systems.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe 1996 study was commissioned by the Jozani-Chwaka Bay Conservation Project (JCBCP), then a partnership between the Zanzibar government and CARE Tanzania. We would like to thank everyone who supported the study and provided assistance to us, in particular all those who agreed to be interviewed and/or who provided us with access to records. Special thanks are due to Thabit S. Masoud, then Head of Conservation in the Commission for Natural Resources; Rob Wild, former Conservation Advisor for the JCBCP; and Tony Archer for sharing his experience and ideas with us. We are particularly grateful to our principal partners in fieldwork: Ali Ali Mwinyi, then Wildlife Officer in the Commission for Natural Resources, and Suleiman Iddi Hamadi, then Assistant Secretary of the National Hunters. Without their help we could not have completed the field survey in the short time allocated. The manuscript was improved by the critiques of two anonymous reviewers.REFERENCESAkama, J.S., C.L. Land & G.W. Burnett (1995). Conflicting attitudes toward state wildlife conservation programs in Kenya. Society and Natural Resources 8: 133-144.Alvard, M.S. (1993). Testing the "ecologically noble savage" hypothesis: interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology 21: 355-387.Alvard, M.S., J.G. Robinson, K.H. Redford & H. Kaplan (1997). The sustainability of subsistence hunting in the neotropics. Conservation Biology 11: 977-982.Archer, A.L. (1994). A Survey of Hunting Techniques and the Results Thereof on Two Species of Duiker and the Suni Antelopes in Zanzibar. FINNIDA / Forestry Sector, Commission for Natural Resources, Zanzibar, Tanzania.Ayres, J.M., D. de M. Lima, E. de S. Martins & J.L.K. Barreiros (1991). On the track of the road: changes in subsistence hunting in a Brazilian Amazonian village. In J.G. Robinson and K.H. Redford (eds), Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Pp. 82-92.Badola, R. (1998). Attitudes of local people towards conservation and alternatives to forest resources: a case study from the lower Himalayas. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1245-1259.Bjerke, T., O. Reitan & S.R. Kellert (1998). Attitudes toward wolves in southeastern Norway. Society and Natural Resources 11: 169-178.Ferguson, M.A.D., R.G. Williamson & F. Messier (1998). Inuit knowledge of long-term changes in a population of Arctic tundra caribou. Arctic 51: 201-219.Goldman, H.V. & M. T. Walsh (1997). A Leopard in Jeopardy: An Anthropological Survey of Practices and Beliefs Which Threaten the Survival of the Zanzibar Leopard (Panthera pardus adersi). Jozani-Chwaka Bay Conservation Project / Commission for Natural Resources, Zanzibar, Tanzania. [An electronic version can be obtained from the authors on request.]Hackel, J.D. (1990). Conservation attitudes in southern Africa - a comparison between Kwazulu and Swaziland. Human Ecology 18: 203-209.Hamilton, P.H. (1986). Status of the leopard in Kenya, with reference to sub-Saharan Africa. In S.D. Miller and D.D. Everett (eds), Cats of the World: Biology, Conservation, and Management. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C. Pp. 447-457.Hill, CM. (1998). Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. Environmental Conservation 25: 244-250.Infield, M. (1988). Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 45: 21-46.Kellert, S.R., M. Black, C. Reid Rush & A.J. Bath (1996). Human culture and large carnivore conservation in North America. Conservation Biology 10: 977-990.Kingdon, J. (1977). East African Mammals: An Atlas of Evolution in Africa. Vol. IIIA, Carnivores. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Kingdon, J. (1989). Island Africa: The Evolution of Africa's Rare Animals and Plants. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Marshall, S. (1994). The Status of the Zanzibar Leopard. Forestry Sector, Commission for Natural Resources, Zanzibar, Tanzania.Mehta, J.N. & S.R. Kellert (1998). Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Environmental Conservation 25: 320-333.Mishra, C. (1997). Livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Indian trans-Himalaya: conflict perceptions and conservation prospects. Environmental Conservation 24: 338-343.Miththapala, S., J. Seidensticker & S.J. O'Brien (1996). Phylogeographic subspecies recognition in leopards (Panthera pardus): molecular genetic variation. Conservation Biology 10: 1115-1132.Nepal, S.K. & K.E. Weber (1995). Prospects for coexistence - wildlife and local people. Ambio 24: 238-245.Newmark, W.D., N.L. Leonard, H.I. Sariko & D.-G.M. Gamassa (1993). Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biological Conservation 63: 177-183.Nowell, K. & P. Jackson (eds) (1996). Wild Cats. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Oli, M.K., I.R. Taylor & M.E. Rogers (1994). Snow leopard Panthera uncia predation of livestock: an assessment of local perceptions in the Annapurna conservation area, Nepal. Biological Conservation 68: 63-68.Pakenham, R.H.W. (1984). The Mammals of Zanzibar and Pemba Islands. Printed privately, Harpenden. UKPocock, R.I. (1932). The leopards of Africa. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1932: 543-591.Poizat, G. & E. Baran (1997). Fishermen's knowledge as background information in tropical fish ecology: a quantitative comparison with fish sampling results. Environmental Biology of Fishes 50: 435-449.Reading, R.P. & S.R. Kellert (1993). Attitudes toward a proposed reintroduction of black- footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes). Conservation Biology 7: 569-580.Robins, R.J. (1976). The composition of the Jozani Forest, Zanzibar. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 72: 233-234.Saberwal, V.K., J.P. Gibbs, R. Chellam & A.J.T. Johnsingh (1994). Lion-human conflict in the Gir Forest, India. Conservation Biology 8: 501-507.Seidensticker, J.D. (1991). Leopards. In J.D. Seidensticker & S. Lumpin (eds), Great Cats: Majestic Creatures of the Wild. Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pennsylvania. Pp. 106-114.Selkow, B. (1995). A Survey of Villager Perceptions of the Zanzibar Leopard. Forestry Sector, Commission for Natural Resources, Zanzibar, Tanzania.Silva, J.L. & S.D. Strahl (1991). Human impact on populations of chachalacas, guans, and curassows (Galliformes: Cracidae) in Venezuela. In J.G. Robinson and K.H. Redford (eds), Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation. University of Chicago Press, London. Pp. 37-52.Stander, P.E., //. Ghau, D. Tsisaba, //. oma & ||. Ui (1997). Tracking and the interpretation of spoor: a scientifically sound method in ecology. Journal of Zoology 242: 329-341.Stuart, C. & T. Stuart (1997). A Preliminary Faunal Survey of South-eastern Unguja (Zanzibar) with Special Emphasis on the Leopard Panthera pardus adersi. African-Arabian Wildlife Research Centre, Loxton, South Africa.Swai, I.S. (1983). Wildlife Conservation Status in Zanzibar. M.Sc. thesis, University of Dar es Salaam.Swynnerton, G.H. & R.W. Hayman (1951). A checklist of the land mammals of the Tanganyika Territory and the Zanzibar Protectorate. Journal of the East Africa Natural History Society 20: 274-392.United Republic of Tanzania (1991). 1988 Population Census: Unguja Regional Profile. Dar es Salaam: President's Office - Planning Commission, Bureau of Statistics.Van Rompaey, H. & M. Colyn (1998). A new servaline genet (Carnivora, Viverridae) from Zanzibar Island. South African Journal of Zoology 33: 42-46.Walsh, M.T. & S.P. Harvey (1997). Understanding and Engaging Local Knowledge and Practice: Practical Approaches to Natural Resources Research and Development Illustrated by Project Experiences in Zanzibar. Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich. [An electronic version can be obtained from the authors on request].Williams, A., T.S. Masoud & W. Othman (1998). Community-based conservation: experiences from Zanzibar. Gatekeeper Series No. 80, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.Zanzibar Revolutionary Government (1992). Household Budget Survey 1991. Volume III: Basic Social Demographic and Housing Characteristics. Zanzibar: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Planning.

Helle V. Goldman and Martin T. Walsh "Is The Zanzibar Leopard (Panthera pardus adersi) Extinct," Journal of East African Natural History 91(1), 15-25, (1 January 2002).[15:ITZLPP]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 January 2002

Get copyright permission
Back to Top