How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2013 International Field Trials of Pyrethroid-Treated Wood Exposed toCoptotermes acinaciformis in Australia and Coptotermes formosanus(Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in China and the United States
J. W. Creffield, M. Lenz, D. K. Scown, T. A. Evans, J.-H. Zhong, B. M. Kard, J.R.B. Hague, K. S. Brown, E. D. Freytag, J. P. Curole, W. R. Smith, T. F. Shupe
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Coptotermes Wasmann is one of the most important genera of wood-destroying insect pests, both in its native and introduced countries. Pyrethroids are among the most widely used insecticides in wood preservation around the world. Consequently, they have often been evaluated against different species of Coptotermes. However, because various test methods have been used between countries, comparing results is problematic. These field trials, using a single aboveground method of exposure, assessed a range of retentions of two pyrethroids (bifenthrin and permethrin) in Pinus radiata D. Don sapwood against two species of Coptotermes in three countries to provide directly comparable results. Coptotermes acinaciformis (Froggatt) in Australia consumed the most nontreated wood, followed by Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki in China, then C formosanus in the United States, although these data were not significantly different. Both termite species demonstrated a dose-response to wood treated with the two pyrethroids; less wood was consumed as retention increased. Overall, C. acinaciformis consumed relatively little of the treated wood. In comparison, C. formosanus consumed 20–90% of the wood treated at the lowest retentions of the pyrethroids evaluated. Results indicated that C. acinaciformis was more sensitive to pyrethroid toxicity/ repellency compared with C. formosanus. Factors that may have influenced the results are discussed. However, using a single aboveground method of exposure across three countries, that suited both species of Coptotermes, made it possible to determine unambiguously the actual differences between the species in their tolerances to the two pyrethroid insecticides.

© 2013 Entomological Society of America
J. W. Creffield, M. Lenz, D. K. Scown, T. A. Evans, J.-H. Zhong, B. M. Kard, J.R.B. Hague, K. S. Brown, E. D. Freytag, J. P. Curole, W. R. Smith, and T. F. Shupe "International Field Trials of Pyrethroid-Treated Wood Exposed toCoptotermes acinaciformis in Australia and Coptotermes formosanus(Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in China and the United States," Journal of Economic Entomology 106(1), 329-337, (1 February 2013). https://doi.org/10.1603/EC12058
Received: 6 February 2012; Accepted: 1 November 2012; Published: 1 February 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
bifenthrin
Coptotermes acinaciformis
Coptotermes formosanus
permethrin
pyrethroid
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top