Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2014 Efficacy of Enthomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae Against Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)
Author Affiliations +

The tomato borer Tuta absoluta Meyrick is a serious tomato pest that has lately undergone a rapid expansion, causing severe crop losses. An integrated management is required to control this insect, within which biological control is now beginning to play a key role. In this regard, the effectiveness of a liquid formulation based on strains of the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae variety anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin (4.46 × 10 viable conidia per milliliter), applied together with irrigation water, has been evaluated by laboratory tests on different populations of T. absoluta. A bioassay method has been developed to test the efficacy of the product. The technique chosen has been validated and the different studied populations have been typified according to their susceptibility, determining the baseline susceptibility of the pest to the fungus. The results revealed a complete efficacy of M. anisopliae against pupae of T. absoluta at the recommended label rate (5.58 × 109 viable conidia per liter) for the populations assayed. Moreover, a notably lower dose was also sufficiently effective to control the tomato borer populations because values of LC90 lower than 3 × 109 viable conidia per liter were obtained unfailingly. The most sensitive populations were those collected in Almeria and Nijar, Spain, with LC50 values of 0.21 and 0.22 × 109 viable conidia per liter-1, respectively. The average value obtained for LC50 was 0.34 × 10 viable conidia per liter-1 and 2 × 10 for LC90. These results show the potential of M. anisopliae to control pupae of the tomato borer in integrated pest management programs.

© 2014 Entomological Society of America
J. Contreras, J. E. Mendoza, M. R. Martínez-Aguirre, L. García-Vidal, J. Izquierdo, and P. Bielza "Efficacy of Enthomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae Against Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)," Journal of Economic Entomology 107(1), 121-124, (1 February 2014).
Received: 17 September 2013; Accepted: 1 December 2013; Published: 1 February 2014

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top