Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2002 Genetics of Resistance to Phosphine in Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The inheritance of resistance to phosphine was studied in two strains of the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), labeled ‘Weak-R’ and ‘Strong-R’. These strains were purified versions of field-selected populations collected in Queensland, Australia. Weak-R and Strong-R were, respectively, 23.4 times (20-h exposure) and 600 times (48-h exposure) resistant to phosphine compared with a reference susceptible strain (S-strain). Each -R strain was crossed with the S-strain and the response to phosphine was measured in their respective F1, F2, and F1-backcross (F1-BC) progenies. Data from testing of reciprocal F1 progeny indicated that resistance in Weak-R was autosomal and incompletely recessive with a degree of dominance -0.96. Modified chi-square analysis and contingency analysis of the observed response to phosphine of F1-BC and F2 progenies rejected the hypothesis of single gene inheritance of resistance. Analysis of the response of the F1, F2, and F1-BC progeny from the Strong-R x S-strain cross also rejected the null hypothesis for single gene resistance. Resistance in the Strong-R strain was autosomal and incompletely recessive with a degree of dominance of -0.64. The Weak-R and Strong-R strains were then crossed. Analysis of the F1and F2 progenies of this reciprocal cross revealed that the strong resistance phenotype was coded by a combination of the genes already present in the Weak-R genotype plus an extra major, incompletely recessive gene. There was also evidence of a minor dominant gene present in ≈5% of Strong-R individuals.

Patrick J. Collins, Gregory J. Daglish, Mervyn Bengston, Tina M. Lambkin, and Hervoika Pavic "Genetics of Resistance to Phosphine in Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae)," Journal of Economic Entomology 95(4), 862-869, (1 August 2002). https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.4.862
Received: 13 September 2001; Accepted: 1 February 2002; Published: 1 August 2002
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top