BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2000 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEST SUCCESS AND CONCEALMENT IN TWO GROUND-NESTING PASSERINES
David J. Flaspohler, Stanley A. Temple, Robert N. Rosenfield
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We examined vegetation characteristics around nest sites of the Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) and Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus) for three summers in the northern-and mixed-hardwood forests of northern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan to test the hypothesis that nests with greater concealment are less vulnerable to depredation. Because these two ground-nesting passerines differ in terms of nest structure and behavior near the nest, they present an opportunity to examine how these two factors influence reproductive success in sympatric species. Depredation was the most common source of nest failure for both species, with Ovenbirds having higher nest success for data pooled across years. Side (but not overhead) concealment was correlated positively with nest success for the Hermit Thrush but not for the Ovenbird. Side and overhead concealment did not differ between the Hermit Thrush and Ovenbird. We found a substantial proportion of nests in ground pine (Lycopodium obscurum). Hermit Thrush, but not Ovenbird nests in ground pine were significantly more concealed than nests in other sites both from the side and overhead. Vegetative concealment at the nest microsite may be more important to the open-cup nest of the Hermit Thrush than to the domed nest of the Ovenbird. Because flushed Ovenbirds perform a distraction display and Hermit Thrushes do not, Ovenbirds may have an incentive to choose nest sites that offer less than maximum concealment.

David J. Flaspohler, Stanley A. Temple, and Robert N. Rosenfield "RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEST SUCCESS AND CONCEALMENT IN TWO GROUND-NESTING PASSERINES," Journal of Field Ornithology 71(4), 736-747, (1 October 2000). https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-71.4.736
Received: 29 September 1999; Accepted: 1 February 2000; Published: 1 October 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top