BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2001 NEST SUCCESS IS NOT AN ADEQUATE COMPARATIVE ESTIMATE OF AVIAN REPRODUCTION
Bruce C. Thompson, Gregory E. Knadle, Donald L. Brubaker, Kathleen S. Brubaker
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Quantifying productivity of bird populations often involves calculating nest success from samples of nests found during a breeding season. Female reproductive output (annual or lifetime) is important to demographic modeling of birds, but nest success is a poor metric to compare productivity among areas or populations. Based on preliminary review, we hypothesized that avian literature poorly distinguishes annual reproductive success from nest success regardless of species' breeding strategies, and that the influence of renesting and multiple brooding on avian productivity is infrequently recognized. We investigated the reporting of nest success, annual reproductive success, renesting, and multiple brooding in 356 articles across 81 journal-years for nine journals that frequently publish ornithological literature. We found 54% of 356 articles reporting productivity estimators used variations of nest success. However, only 10% of articles reported estimates of annual reproductive output. We found that 28% of articles reported the breeding strategy of the species studied, and 47% acknowledged renesting or multi-brooded species. There was no temporal increase in acknowledgment of species' breeding strategy, renesting, or multi-brooding. Our review indicated little distinction between nest success and annual reproductive success. To accurately support conservation evaluations, we believe use of nest success in assessing avian productivity must be critically examined.

Bruce C. Thompson, Gregory E. Knadle, Donald L. Brubaker, and Kathleen S. Brubaker "NEST SUCCESS IS NOT AN ADEQUATE COMPARATIVE ESTIMATE OF AVIAN REPRODUCTION," Journal of Field Ornithology 72(4), 527-536, (1 October 2001). https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-72.4.527
Received: 7 December 1999; Accepted: 1 January 2001; Published: 1 October 2001
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top