How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2014 Phenotypic Plasticity in the Relative Hind-Limb Growth of Lab-Reared Anolis sagrei: Replication of Experimental Results and a Test of Perch Diameter Preference
Gabriel J. Langford, Joseph M. Macedonia, Christopher W. Bessette, Jennifer L. Matey, Brittany A. Raboin, Ashley E. Schiffmacher, Brett J. Reynolds
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Several observational and experimental studies have shown that perch diameter has an impact on the development of hind-limb length (HL) in Anolis species. This “phenotypic plasticity” in relative hind-limb growth (RHG) has implications for short-term and long-term adaptation to different structural habitats. Our study is the first to replicate research in which hatchling/juvenile Anolis sagrei were reared on narrow-diameter or broad-diameter dowels in a laboratory setting. Although subjects reared on different dowel diameters did not differ significantly in RHG at 5 weeks into the experiment, results at 15 weeks revealed a significant effect of treatment but not of sex: subjects in the broad (N = 69) treatment group exhibited significantly greater RHG than did subjects in the narrow (N = 61) treatment group. We extended this research with a novel follow-up study: we placed our lab-reared subjects into outdoor enclosures where they had a choice of narrow- or broad-diameter dowels on which to perch. Results showed that subjects in both treatment groups chose broad-diameter dowels as perches more often than narrow-diameter dowels. We offer several potential explanations for the strong preference of our subjects for broad-diameter dowels irrespective of the dowel diameter on which they were reared.

Gabriel J. Langford, Joseph M. Macedonia, Christopher W. Bessette, Jennifer L. Matey, Brittany A. Raboin, Ashley E. Schiffmacher, and Brett J. Reynolds "Phenotypic Plasticity in the Relative Hind-Limb Growth of Lab-Reared Anolis sagrei: Replication of Experimental Results and a Test of Perch Diameter Preference," Journal of Herpetology 48(2), 228-232, (1 June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1670/12-198
Accepted: 1 July 2013; Published: 1 June 2014
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top