Translator Disclaimer
15 May 2019 The Earliest Fossil of the African Clawed Frog (Genus Xenopus) from Sub-Saharan Africa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Although the fossil record of pipoid frogs is more extensive than for other anuran clades, crown-group genera are poorly documented throughout the Cenozoic. We report an isolated neurocranium from the Nsungwe Formation (∼25 million years ago; Oligocene) in southwestern Tanzania, providing the earliest evidence for the genus Xenopus in sub-Saharan Africa. The specimen is well preserved, allowing us to use three-dimensional geometric morphometrics to compare the shape of this neurocranium to those of all extant species of Xenopus based on microcomputed tomography scans. Analyses revealed that this small fossil resembles diminutive extant species of Xenopus such as X. longipes. The fossil neurocranium preserves well-ossified tectum nasi and septum nasi, the latter separating large ovoid olfactory foramina, contributing to a more-ossified region surrounding the prootic foramen than observed in extant species of similar size. The Nsungwe Formation pipoid fossil contributes new information to the early biogeography and body-size diversification within the genus Xenopus.

African clawed frogs in the genus Xenopus are found today throughout sub-Saharan Africa and, because of their widespread use as model organisms in biological research, as introduced populations around the world (Measey et al., 2012; Evans et al., 2015). Because all members of the family Pipidae, including Xenopus, are predominantly aquatic frogs with a preference for slow-moving bodies of water, they likely have a high potential for fossilization. Indeed, the fossil record for the Pipidae, and more generally the Pipoidea, is extensive and extends into the Mesozoic of both Africa and South America (e.g., Báez and Rage, 1998; Báez et al., 2000; Rage and Dutheil, 2008; Rage et al., 2013; Gómez, 2016). As most of these fossils are not referable to extant genera, many have been described as representing extinct pipoid taxa. When complete body fossils are preserved, the morphology of these extinct taxa is similar enough to living species to suggest a long evolutionary history for the aquatic ecology observed in extant species (Cannatella, 2015). Two extinct taxa (Singidella from the Eocene of Tanzania, and Pachycentrata from the Upper Cretaceous of Niger) are attributed to the crown-group subfamily Pipinae (Báez and Harrison, 2005; Cannatella, 2015). The fossil record for the other and more species-rich subfamily Xenopodinae remains poorly documented, though several extinct taxa (Saltenia from the Late Cretaceous and Llankibatrachus and Shelania from the Eocene; all from Argentina) have been referred to the larger clade Xenopodinomorpha (Trueb and Báez, 2006; Cannatella, 2015). To date, no fossils that can be confidently referred to the extant genus Xenopus have been described from the Palaeogene of sub-Saharan Africa, when this genus is thought to have originated (Cannatella, 2015).

Here we report the earliest fossil material from sub-Saharan Africa referable to the extant pipid genus Xenopus based on a specimen from the upper Oligocene Nsungwe Formation in the Rukwa Rift Basin of southwestern Tanzania (Fig. 1). Localities from this formation preserve a diverse vertebrate and invertebrate fauna (Stevens et al., 2008, 2009, 2013; Roberts et al., 2010, 2012) from ∼25 million years ago (mya) (Roberts et al., 2010, 2012), including amphibians and reptiles (McCartney et al., 2014; Blackburn et al., 2015; Müller et al., 2018). Isolated vertebrae from the Nsungwe Formation represent the earliest fossil evidence of the family Ptychadenidae (Blackburn et al., 2015), though additional post-cranial and cranial elements of anurans await description. Among the most distinctive of anuran fossils found so far is a small, isolated neurocranium (Fig. 2), described herein as referable to xenopodinomorph pipids based on the presence of an exposed canal for the Eustachian tube on the ventral surface of the otic capsule and frontoparietals that narrow rostrally and lack anterolateral flanges (Cannatella, 1985).

Fig. 1.

Location of the Rukwa Rift Basin containing the Nsungwe Formation fossil-bearing localities. Star notes collection locality of RRBP 13274B.

f01_125.jpg

Fig. 2.

High-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan of RRBP 13274B showing the neurocranium in dorsal (A), ventral (B), rostral (C), right lateral (D), and caudal (E) views; inset shows color photograph of specimen in same view. Also shown is the left stapes in left lateral view (F), which was isolated from the left otic region in the CT scan. Abbreviations: Ec, Eustachian canal; fp, frontoparietal; mc, attachment site for m. cucullaris; oc, occipital condyle; of, olfactory foramen; pk, palatine knob; pof, prootic foramen; sn, septum nasi; sph, sphenethmoid. Scale bars equal 1 mm.

f02_125.jpg

Comparisons to extant species of the genus Xenopus reveal xenopodinomorph affinities of the neurocranium. We compare this specimen to neurocrania isolated from microcomputed tomographic (microCT) scans of fluid-preserved specimens representing all extant species in the genus. We use three-dimensional geometric morphometrics to compare the fossil from the Nsungwe Formation with variation seen across the two extant subgenera (Silurana and Xenopus) in the clade. Our findings are relevant both to understanding the antiquity of crown-group Xenopus as well as the historical biogeography of this biologically important taxon.

Materials and Methods

Sampling.—For morphological comparisons and statistical analyses, we sampled all 29 currently recognized extant species of Xenopus, including primary types of 15 of these species and representatives of species that today occur in the region such as X. borealis, X. laevis, X. muelleri, and X. victorianus. We follow the taxonomy for Xenopus by Evans et al. (2015) in recognizing two subgenera, Silurana and Xenopus, as well as three species groups within subgenus Xenopus (amieti, laevis, and muelleri species groups). We obtained morphological data for 50 specimens in addition to the isolated neurocranium from the Nsungwe Formation. Institutional abbreviations for the specimens studied are as follows: AMNH, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA; BMNH, Natural History Museum, London, UK; CAS, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, USA; MCZ, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA; MHNG, Museum d'histoire naturelle de Genève, Switzerland; NCSM, North Carolina State Museum, Raleigh, USA; RRBP, Rukwe Rift Basin Project, Tanzanian Antiquities Unit, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; UF, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

Computed Tomography (CT) Scanning.—We performed high-resolution computed tomography (microCT) scanning at the GE Sensing and Inspection Technologies facility (San Carlos, California, USA), and at the University of Florida's Nanoscale Research Facility, using a Phoenix v∣tome∣x S and Phoenix v∣tome∣x M (GE Measurement & Control Solutions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA), respectively. All scans were run using a 180-kv X-ray tube containing a diamond-tungsten target, with the voltage, current, and detector capture time adjusted for each scan to maximize absorption range for each specimen. Raw X-ray data were processed using GE's proprietary datos∣x software v.2.3 to produce a series of tomogram images and volumes, with final voxel resolutions ranging from 4.5 to 72 lm. The resulting microCT volume files were imported into VG StudioMax v.3.0 (Volume Graphics, Heidelberg, Germany), the neurocrania isolated using VG StudioMax's suite of segmentation tools, and then exported as high-fidelity shapefiles (.ply format). We deposited image stacks (TIFF) and 3D mesh files (STL) in MorphoSource (Supplementary Table S1).

Shape Analyses.—We quantified interspecific shape variation of the neurocranium using three-dimensional geometric morphometric analyses in the R package ‘geomorph’ v.3.0.3 (Adams and Otarola-Castillo, 2013). Sixteen fixed landmarks were digitized on each shape file corresponding to homologous and repeatable points on the frontoparietal, otic region, and basicranium ( Supplementary Fig. S1 (Figure S1_landmarks.pdf)). We performed a generalized Procrustes analysis to align, rotate, and scale specimen landmark data to a common coordinate system and unit-centroid size to remove variation in position, orientation, and size (Rohlf and Slice, 1990), resulting in a set of shape variables, or Procrustes tangent coordinates, for all specimens. We examined the trends of allometry by assessing the multivariate regression between neurocranium shape and centroid size (CS, the square root of summed squared distances of landmarks from the configuration centroid, Bookstein, 1991; method RegScore, Drake and Klingenberg, 2008) using Procrustes distances, and we generated a regression plot to visualize this relationship.

We performed a Procrustes multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to test if mean shape differed between the subgenera Xenopus and Silurana to identify the presence or absence of morphological divergence. A principal component analysis of neurocranium shape variation was performed and the Procrustes-aligned specimens were plotted in two dimensions of tangent space (PC1 and PC2) and grouped by subgenus and species group membership. To aid in the visualization of shape variation in a phylogenetic context, we mapped PC2 scores of each species on the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) phylogeny of (Evans et al. 2015). Scores for PC2 were extracted for the largest individual of each species and then mapped onto the phylogeny using the continuous ancestral state reconstruction function (contMap) in the R package ‘phytools’ (Revell, 2012).

Results

Shape Analyses.—A multivariate regression of neurocranium shape on log centroid size exhibited significant positive allometry (SS = 0.0443, MS = 0.0443, R2 = 0.14, F1,49 = 6.963, P < 0.0001; 10,000 iterations), indicating a neurocranium size-to-shape relationship within Xenopus that is similar within the subgenera and species groups ( Fig. S2 (Figure S2_regression.pdf)). A MANOVA revealed that mean neurocranium shape differed between the subgenera Xenopus and Silurana (SS = 0.0520, MS = 0.026, R2 = 0.16, F2,48 = 4.635, P < 0.0001; 10,000 iterations). A PCA plot of shape variation demonstrated distinct clustering of Silurana and Xenopus in tangent space (PC1 = 29%, PC2 = 13% variance explained; Fig. 3B,  Fig. S3 (Figure S3_warped surfaces of minXmax.pdf)). In contrast, patterns of shape variation among the species groups in subgenus Xenopus are largely overlapping in tangent space (Fig. 3B). The PC1 axis describes the shape differences driven by the size of the otic region relative to the length of the frontoparietal. Specimens that have a negative PC1 value possess a large otic capsule and a truncated frontoparietal while specimens that have a positive PC1 value possess a small otic capsule and an elongate frontoparietal. The PC2 axis describes the shape differences driven by the relative length, width, and height of the frontoparietal (independent of the otic region) as well as the relative size of the foramen magnum. Xenopus and Silurana occupy distinct regions of neurocranium morphospace because of nonoverlapping PC2 values.

Fig. 3.

Relationship of RRBP 13274B to patterns of neurocranium shape observed among extant species in the genus Xenopus. (A) Values of PC2 scores for each species are mapped onto the mtDNA phylogeny of (Evans et al. 2015), revealing both differences between subgenus Silurana and multiple trends towards negative PC2 scores within subgenus Xenopus. (B) Morphospace of neurocrania of the genus Xenopus defined by PC1 and PC2 scores showing high overlap among species groups within subgenus Xenopus and similarities of RRBP 13274B to small species such as X. longipes.

f03_125.jpg

Species of Xenopus possess a frontoparietal that is elongate, narrow, and dorsoventrally deep as well as a relatively small foramen magnum (negative PC2 values). Species of Silurana possess a frontoparietal that is truncated, broad, and dorsoventrally compressed, and have a relatively large foramen magnum (positive PC2 values; see Fig. S4 for warped surfaces of PC1 and PC2 minima and maxima generated using warpRefMesh geomorph function). The continuous ancestral state reconstruction of PC2 on the mtDNA phylogeny of Xenopus (Evans et al., 2015) illustrates the morphological divergence in neurocranium shape between the two subgenera (Fig. 3A). It also illustrates a tendency for different species groups within Xenopus to independently achieve similar negative PC2 values; note that X. largeni as well as both the amieti and laevis species groups all attain similar negative PC2 values. The neurocranium from the Nsungwe Formation occupies the same region of morphospace as the species in the subgenus Xenopus (Fig. 3B) because of the relative proportions of its frontoparietal and small foramen magnum.

Systematic Paleontology

AMPHIBIA Linnaeus, 1758
ANURA Fischer von Waldheim, 1813
PIPIDAE Gray, 1825
Xenopus Wagler, 1827
subgenus Xenopus sp. indet.

  • Referred Specimen.—One isolated neurocranium: RRBP 13274B. All of the skeletal elements that are typically synostotically fused to form the pipid neurocranium are present, though the surfaces are weathered and either crushed or, in some places, missing.

  • Locality and Age.—RRBP 13274B was collected from locality Nsungwe 2B in the late Oligocene Nsungwe Formation of the Rukwa Rift Basin of southwestern Tanzania (Fig. 1). The Nsungwe 2B locality (∼1,200 m above sea level) represents an ash-rich depositional interval, precisely dated to 25.2 mya, within a fluviolacustrine succession interpreted as a semiarid wetlands system that developed in the rift system between 26–24 mya. Age constraint for the fluvial to shallow lacustrine deposits within the sequence are provided by U-Pb and Ar-Ar dating of intercalated volcanic tuffs bracketing fossil localities along with supporting magnetostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and detrital zircon age constraints (Roberts et al., 2012; Stevens et al., 2013).

  • Description.—RRBP 13274B is an isolated neurocranium (Fig. 2), 9.0 mm long (from the occipital condyle to the anterior extent of the sphenethmoid) and 8.2 mm wide (from otic capsule to otic capsule) that is triangular in dorsal view with prominent otic regions and a narrow and anteriorly tapering braincase. As in other pipids, the sphenethmoid comprises the anterolateral walls of the braincase and preserves the posterior margins of the orbitonasal foramen and the anterior margins of the optic foramen. The sphenethmoid incorporates well-ossified tectum nasi and septum nasi, the latter separating large ovoid olfactory foramina, and is weakly constricted anterior to the optic foramen. There may be a weak embayment at the anterior margin of the dorsal sphenethmoid indicating the presence of the nasals. The neurocranium is crushed anterior to the otic capsules in the region of the prepalatine connection. The right prootic foramen appears to be present and indicates that this foramen is located posterodorsal to the optic foramen on the anterior surface of the otic capsule. The surfaces of the otic region are worn and the posterior regions crushed and, in some places, incomplete. The foramen magnum is bordered by a pair of thin and weakly curved occipital condyles. The otic capsule bears a well-defined and exposed canal on the ventral surface that is oriented obliquely to the long-axis of the neurocranium. In life, the Eustachian tube passed through this canal, the anterior margins of which are formed by the palatine knob and the posterior margin by the ventral region of the otic capsule. The damage to the posterior otic capsules leads to it being difficult to assess the features of the condyloid fossa, jugular and perilymphatic foramina, and the process posteroventral to the condyloid fossa.

  • The CT-scan revealed a stapes lodged within the left otic capsule, which we digitally isolated (Fig. 2F). This left stapes is complete, preserving the rod-like bony pars media plectri that in life would have been embedded within the tympanic disc distally (Mason et al., 2009). The proximal stapes is slightly expanded at the articulation with the pars interna plectri. Ventrally, the stapes bears a small bony projection corresponding to one insertion point of the m. cucullaris (Mason et al., 2009). Few pipoid stapes have been figured and described in any detail, precluding further comparisons.

  • Remarks.—Because the elements of the neurocranium appear to be synostotically fused and the optic foramen is enclosed within bone, we interpret RRBP 13274B as representing an individual that is well past metamorphosis (Trueb and Hanken, 1992).

  • Comparisons.—The combination of a canal for the Eustachian tubes, a sphenethmoid that encloses the optic foramen, and a palatine knob all support RRBP 13274B being referred to the Pipoidea (Cannatella, 1985; Báez and Pugener, 2003; Rage and Dutheil, 2008). The rounded lateral profile and the exposed condition of the Eustachian canal supports an affinity with the genus Xenopus (Cannatella and Trueb, 1988). Quantitative assessments of overall shape reveal strong similarities to subgenus Xenopus (Fig. 2). Specimen RRBP 13274B is small in comparison to most extant species but similar in both size and shape to the smallest species within subgenus Xenopus. In comparison to small species such as X. longipes, the lateral walls of the neurocranium, especially in the region of the prootic foramen, appear to be more fully ossified in RRBP 13274B. In subgenus Silurana, the otic region is typically displaced anteriorly relative to the occiput, and there is a pronounced constriction of the braincase at the posterior sphenethmoid such that the anterior neurocranium appears widely expanded (Estes, 1975). Further, there is no evidence for a prominent epiotic eminence as found in Silurana. Other authors have reported that the septum nasi is poorly ossified in extant species (Báez and Pugener, 1998; Gómez, 2016) and some extinct species (Henrici and Báez, 2001), but our survey of extant diversity shows that this feature is highly variable and sometimes present and well defined as in RRBP 13274B. Similarly, the lateral reduction of the sphenethmoid in Xenopus has been reported as leading to an orbitonasal foramen that is incompletely surrounded by bone (Cannatella and Trueb 1988), though we observed a completely enclosed foramen in some species (X. boumbaensis, X. itombwensis). We refrain from erecting a new taxon to accommodate this fossil because of the lack of clearly diagnostic features to differentiate it from other species of Xenopus.

  • Discussion

    Our analyses based on a synoptic collection of extant species demonstrate the value of sampling all species within the extant clades. If we relied on a small set of exemplars, such as X. laevis, X. muelleri, and X. tropicalis to identify this isolated neurocranium, the combination of characters identified in this fossil could lead to an interpretation that the morphology of the fossil rests outside of the variation observed among living species (Fig. 3B). Instead, by sampling all extant species, we found that the Nsungwe Formation fossil bears clear similarities to smaller extant species within the subgenus Xenopus, which occupies a large region of morphospace. As the two subgenera of extant Xenopus occupy distinct regions of morphospace, this general approach may facilitate further refinements in the identification of isolated pipoid neurocrania from the Cenozoic.

    Our morphometric analysis demonstrates a relationship between size and shape in extant species of Xenopus. Small species (e.g., X. longipes) are generally characterized by a large otic capsule relative to the frontoparietal (negative PC1 values) whereas large species (e.g., X. laevis) possess relatively small otic capsules (positive PC1 values). The trend of large braincases and sensory organs (including the otic capsule and inner ear) in small-bodied taxa has been broadly documented in both frogs and salamanders (Hanken, 1984; Yeh, 2002), but this is the first report of cranial allometry in the genus Xenopus. The two subgenera of Xenopus possess divergent neurocranium shapes, but the neurocranium shape of taxa in the X. amieti, X. laevis, and X. muelleri species groups appear influenced by size more than by clade membership.

    Most recent analyses of divergence times within the Pipidae suggest that the divergence of the two subgenera Silurana and Xenopus occurred in the early Cenozoic (reviewed in Cannatella, 2015; Feng et al., 2017). Recent phylogenetic analyses using mtDNA suggest that crown-group Silurana originated 7–10 mya and crown-group Xenopus originated 20–23 mya (Evans et al., 2015), though these dates are half those of other previous estimates (Evans et al., 2004). Historical biogeographic analyses suggest that the origin and early diversification of the subgenus Xenopus occurred in eastern Africa (Evans et al., 2004) and likely before the end of the Paleogene.

    Historically, fossil pipids recovered from the Mesozoic and Cenozoic of both Africa and South America were often attributed to the genus Xenopus. Today, however, none of those Cretaceous or Paleogene records are thought to represent crown-group members of Xenopus. Báez (1996) pointed out that the skull of the “Xenopus-like pipid” reported from the Upper Cretaceous of Niger by de Broin et al. (1974) lacks features to clearly ally this fossil with Xenopus. Similarly, recent phylogenetic analyses suggest that Xenopus romeri described from the Paleocene of Brazil by Estes (1975, 1977) is more closely related to other extinct xenopodine taxa (Báez and Pugener, 1998). Báez (1996) further noted that fossils from the lower Oligocene of Libya described by Špinar (1980) as X. (subgenus Libycus) hasaunus are not referable to Xenopus; Špinar (1980) also suggested affinities of this extinct taxon to another extant pipid genus, Hymenochirus.

    Cenozoic records of Xenopus from the Neogene of Africa include two from the Miocene. Ahl (1926) described Xenopus stromeri based on an isolated neurocranium from the lower Miocene of Namibia which resembled the long, thin neurocrania of large-bodied Xenopus (see also Rage, 2008). Later, Vergnaud-Grazzini (1966) described many associated fossils that she referred to Xenopus from the Miocene of Beni-Mellal in Morocco and for which both she and Estes (1975) noted similarities to species in the subgenus Silurana. Fossils referred to the genus Xenopus are also documented from more recent deposits including the early Pleistocene deposits from Olduvai Gorge (Leakey, 1965, 1971) and the Pliocene and Pleistocene of South Africa (Stromer, 1931; Hendey, 1970). The only previous record of Xenopus from the Paleogene (or earlier) of the Afro-Arabian plate is X. arabiensis from the late Oligocene of Yemen, described by Henrici and Baéz (2001) as resembling species in the muelleri group. Previous to this discovery from the Nsungwe Formation, the earliest occurrence of Xenopus in sub-Saharan Africa was from the Miocene of Namibia (Ahl, 1926), although Rage (2008) argued that this material is not referable to Xenopus. Taken together with information from molecular phylogenies, the Nsungwe neurocranium and X. arabiensis from Yemen suggest that the crown-group of subgenus Xenopus attained both a wide geographic distribution and perhaps a wide range of body sizes relatively early in its diversification.

    Acknowledgments.

    K. Whitman discovered and prepared the fossil specimen. This paper is a contribution to the REACHE (Research on East African Catarrhine and Hominoid Evolution) collaborative network and to the project BR/121/A3/ PalEurAfrica of the Belgian Science Policy Office. Funding for the project was provided by the National Geographic Society–CRE (Committee for Research and Exploration), L. S. B. Leakey Foundation, Ohio University African Studies Program, Ohio University Research Council, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, California Academy of Sciences, James Cook University, and the US National Science Foundation (EAR/IF 0933619, BCS 1127164, and BCS 1313679). We thank J. A. Henderson for initial work on this project, which was supported by the Careers in Science mentorship program at the California Academy of Sciences. IK was supported through Summer Systematics Internship program at California Academy of Sciences. DP was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship (GMO2432). We thank D. Kizirian (American Museum of Natural History), C. Sheehy (Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida), J. Streicher (Natural History Museum, London), J. Vindum and L. Scheinberg (California Academy of Sciences), J. Rosado (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University), A. Schmitz (Museum d'histoire naturelle de Genève), and B. Stuart (North Carolina State Museum).

    Literature Cited

    1. Adams, D. C., and E. Otarola-Castillo. 2013. geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data.Methods in Ecology and Evolution4: 393–399. Google Scholar

    2. Ahl, E. 1926. Xenopus stromeri Ahl, n. sp. Pp. 141–142in E. Kaiser (ed.), Die Diamantenwüste Südwest-Afrikas. Volume 2.Verlag von Dietrich Reimer (Ernst Vohsen), Germany. Google Scholar

    3. Báez, A. M. 1996. The fossil record of the Pipidae. Pp. 329–347in R. C. Tinsley and H. R. Kobel (eds.), The Biology of Xenopus.Oxford University Press, UK. Google Scholar

    4. Báez, A. M., and T. Harrison. 2005. A new pipine frog from an Eocene crater lake in north-central Tanzania.Palaeontology48: 723–737. Google Scholar

    5. Báez, A. M., and L. A. Pugener. 1998. A new Palaeogene pipid frog from northwestern Patagonia.Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology18: 511–524. Google Scholar

    6. Báez, A. M., and L. A. Pugener. 2003. Ontogeny of a new Palaeogene pipid frog from southern South America and xenopodinomorph evolution.Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society139: 439–476. Google Scholar

    7. Báez, A. M., and J.-C. Rage. 1998. Pipid frogs from the Upper Cretaceous of In Beceten, Niger.Palaeontology41: 669–691 Google Scholar

    8. Báez, A. M., L. Trueb, and J. Calvo. 2000. The earliest known pipoid frog from South America: a new genus from the middle Cretaceous of Argentina.Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology20: 490–500. Google Scholar

    9. Blackburn, D. C., E. M. Roberts, and N. J. Stevens. 2015. The earliest record of the endemic African frog family Ptychadenidae from the Oligocene Nsungwe Formation of Tanzania.Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology35: e907174. Google Scholar

    10. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology.Cambridge University Press, UK. Google Scholar

    11. Cannatella, D. C. 1985. A Phylogeny of Primitive Frogs (Archaeobatrachians).Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Kansas, Kansas, USA. Google Scholar

    12. Cannatella, D. C. 2015. Xenopus in space and time: fossils, node calibrations, tip-dating, and paleobiogeography.Cytogenetic and Genome Research145: 283–301. Google Scholar

    13. Cannatella, D. C., and L. Trueb. 1988. Evolution of pipoid frogs: intergeneric relationships of the aquatic frog family Pipidae (Anura).Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society94: 1–38. Google Scholar

    14. De Broin, F., E. Buffetaut, J.-C. Koeniguer, J.-C. Rage, D. Russell, P. Taquet, C. Vergnaud-Grazzini, and S. Wenz. 1974. La faune de Vertébrés continentaux du gisement d'In Beceten (Sénonien du Niger).Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris279: 469–472. Google Scholar

    15. Drake, A. G., and C. P. Klingenberg. 2008. The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St. Bernard dogs.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B275: 71–76. Google Scholar

    16. Estes, R. 1975. Xenopus from the Palaeocene of Brazil and its zoogeographic importance.Nature254: 48–50. Google Scholar

    17. Estes, R. 1977. Relationships of the South African fossil frog Eoxenopoides reuningi (Anura, Pipidae).Annals of the South African Museum73: 49–80. Google Scholar

    18. Evans, B. J., T. F. Carter, E. Greenbaum, V. Gvoždík, D. B. Kelley, P. J. Mclaughlin, O. S. G. Pauwels, D. M. Portik, E. L. Stanley, R. C. Tinsley, Et Al. 2015. Genetics, morphology, advertisement calls, and historical records distinguish six new polyploid species of African clawed frog (Xenopus, Pipidae) from West and Central Africa.PLoS One10: e0142823. Google Scholar

    19. Evans, B. J., D. B. Kelley, R. C. Tinsley, D. J. Melnick, and D. C. Cannatella. 2004. A mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of African clawed frogs: phylogeography and implication for polyploid evolution.Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution33: 197–213. Google Scholar

    20. Feng, Y.-J., D. C. Blackburn, D. Liang, D. M. Hillis, D. B. Wake, D. C. Cannatella, and P. Zhang. 2017. Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA114: E5864–E5870. Google Scholar

    21. Gómez, R. O. 2016. A new pipid frog from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia and early evolution of crown-group Pipidae.Cretaceous Research62: 52–64. Google Scholar

    22. Hanken, J. 1984. Miniaturization and its effects on cranial morphology in plethodontid salamanders, genus Thorius (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). I. Osteological variation.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society23: 55–75. Google Scholar

    23. Hendey, Q. B. 1970. A review of the geology and palaeontology of the Plio/Pleistocene deposits at Langebaanweg, Cape Province.Annals of the South Africa Museum56: 75–117. Google Scholar

    24. Henrici, A. C., and A. M. Báez. 2001. First occurrence of Xenopus (Anura: Pipidae) on the Arabian Peninsula: a new species from the Upper Oligocene of Yemen.Journal of Paleontology75: 870–882. Google Scholar

    25. Leakey, L. 1965. Olduvai Gorge 1951–61. Volume 1: A Preliminary Report on the Geology and Fauna.Cambridge University Press, London. Google Scholar

    26. Leakey, L. 1971. Olduvai Gorge. Volume 3: Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960–1963.Cambridge University Press, UK Google Scholar

    27. Mason, M. J., M. Wang, and P. M. Narins. 2009. Structure and function of the middle ear apparatus of the aquatic frog, Xenopus laevis.Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics31: 13–21. Google Scholar

    28. Mccartney, J. A., N. J. Stevens, and P. M. O'connor. 2014. The earliest colubroid-dominated snake fauna from Africa: perspectives from the Late Oligocene Nsungwe Formation of southwestern Tanzania.PLoS One9: e90415. Google Scholar

    29. Measey, G. J., D. Rödder, S. L. Green, R. Kobayashi, F. Lillo, G. Lobos, R. Rebelo, and J. M. Thirion. 2012. Ongoing invasions of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis: a global review.Biological Invasions14: 2255–2270. Google Scholar

    30. Müller, J., E. Roberts, E. Naylor, and N. Stevens. 2018. A fossil gekkotan (Squamata) from the Late Oligocene Nsungwe Formation, Rukwa Rift Basin, Tanzania.Journal of Herpetology52: 223–227. Google Scholar

    31. Rage, J.-C. 2008. Amphibia (Anura) from the Lower Miocene of the Sperrgebiet, Namibia.Memoir of the Geological Survey of Namibia20: 75–92. Google Scholar

    32. Rage, J.-C., and D. B. Dutheil. 2008. Amphibians and squamates from the Cretaceous (Cenomanian) of Morocco—a preliminary study, with description of a new genus of pipid frog.Palaeontographica Abteilung A285: 1–22. Google Scholar

    33. Rage, J.-C., M. Pickford, and B. Senut. 2013. Amphibians and squamates from the middle Eocene of Namibia, with comments on pre-Miocene anurans from Africa.Annales de Paléontologie99: 217–242. Google Scholar

    34. Revell, L. J. 2012. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things).Methods in Ecology and Evolution3: 217–223. Google Scholar

    35. Roberts, E. M., P. M. O'connor, N. J. Stevens, M. D. Gottfried, Z. A. Jinnah, S. Ngasala, A. M. Choh, and R. A. Armstrong. 2010. Sedimentology and depositional environments of the Red Sandstone Group, Rukwa Rift Basin, southwestern Tanzania: new insight into Cretaceous and Paleogene terrestrial ecosystems and tectonics in sub-equatorial Africa.Journal of African Earth Sciences57: 179–212. Google Scholar

    36. Roberts, E. M., N. J. Stevens, P. M. O'connor, P. H. G. M. Dirks, M. D. Gottfried, W. C. Clyde, R. A. Armstrong, A. I. S. Kemp, and S. Hemming. 2012. Initiation of the western branch of the East African Rift coeval with the eastern branch.Nature Geoscience5: 285–294. Google Scholar

    37. Rohlf, F. J., and D. E. Slice. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks.Systematic Zoology39: 40–59. Google Scholar

    38. Špinar, Z. V. 1980. The discovery of a new species of pipid frog (Anura, Pipidae) in the Oligocene of central Libya. Pp. 327–348in M. J. Salem and M. T. Busrewil (eds.), Geology of Libya. Volume I.Academic Press, UK. Google Scholar

    39. Stevens, N. J., M. D. Gottfried, E. M. Roberts, S. Ngasala, S. Kapilima, and P. M. O'connor. 2008. Paleontological exploration of Africa: a view from the Rukwa Rift Basin of Tanzania. Pp. 159–180in J. G. Fleagle and C. C. Gilbert (eds.), Elwyn Simons, A Search for Origins, Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects.Springer Publishing, USA. Google Scholar

    40. Stevens, N. J., E. M. Roberts, P. M. O'connor, and M. D. Gottfried. 2009. Rukwalorax jinokitana (n. gen., n. sp.) (Mammalia: Hyracoidea) from the late Oligocene Rukwa Rift Basin, Tanzania.Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology29: 972–975. Google Scholar

    41. Stevens, N. J., E. R. Seiffert, P. M. O'connor, E. M. Roberts, M. D. Schmitz, C. Krause, E. Gorscak, S. Ngasala, T. L. Hieronymus, and J. Temu. 2013. Palaeontological evidence for an Oligocene divergence between Old World monkeys and apes.Nature497: 611–614. Google Scholar

    42. Stromer, E. 1931. Reste Süsswasser und Land bewohnender Wirbeltiere aus den Diamantfeldern Klein-Namaqualandes (Südwestafrika).Sitzungsberichte der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Abteilung der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München1931: 17–47. Google Scholar

    43. Trueb, L., and A. Báez. 2006. Revision of the Early Cretaceous Cordicephalus from Israel and an assessment of its relationships among pipoid frogs.Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology26: 44–59. Google Scholar

    44. Trueb, L., and J. Hanken. 1992. Skeletal development in Xenopus laevis (Anura: Pipidae).Journal of Morphology214: 1–41. Google Scholar

    45. Vergnaud-Grazzini, C. 1966. Les amphibiens du Miocéne de Beni-Mellal.Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique du Maroc27: 43–74. Google Scholar

    46. Yeh, J. 2002. The effect of miniaturized body size on skeletal morphology in frogs.Evolution56: 628–641. Google Scholar

    Appendices

    Supplementary Data

    Supplementary data associated with this article can be found online at  http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/18-139.s1.

    Copyright 2019 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
    David C. Blackburn, Daniel J. Paluh, Isaac Krone, Eric M. Roberts, Edward L. Stanley, and Nancy J. Stevens "The Earliest Fossil of the African Clawed Frog (Genus Xenopus) from Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Herpetology 53(2), 125-130, (15 May 2019). https://doi.org/10.1670/18-139
    Accepted: 24 February 2019; Published: 15 May 2019
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    6 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top