Translator Disclaimer
18 February 2012 Mygalomorph Spider Community of a Natural Reserve in a Hilly System in Central Argentina
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The diversity, abundance, spatial distribution, and phenology of the mygalomorph spider community in the “Ernesto Tornquist” Strict Nature Reserve were analyzed in this study. Located in southwestern Buenos Aires, Argentina, the Reserve is representative of the Ventania system, which is a sigmoidal mountain belt 180 km in length. This exceptional hilly ecosystem is home for many endemic species and rich native fauna and flora. Spider abundance was sampled monthly from October 2009 to October 2010 by hand capture and pitfall traps on grassland slopes. The species recorded in the study area were: Actinopus sp.1 (Actinopodidae); Grammostola vachoni and Plesiopelma longisternale (Theraphosidae); Acanthogonatus centralis (Nemesiidae); and Mecicobothrium thorelli (Mecicobothriidae). Grammostola vachoni and Acanthogonatus centralis were the dominant species in hand capture and pitfall traps, respectively. The seasonal variation, diversity, and abundance of the mygalomorph community are analyzed and discussed here. The Mygalomorphae of the Ventania system comprises an important group of sedentary and cryptozoic spiders that seem to be highly dependent on habitat type and environmental factors.

Introduction

There have been many spider community studies in the neotropics (Candiani et al. 2005; Dias et al. 2005; Indicatti et al. 2005; Raizer et al. 2005; Sandoval 2005; Pinkus-Rendón et al. 2006; Podgaiski et al. 2007). As a typical megadiverse group, spiders have gained wide acceptance in ecological studies as indicators of environmental quality (Clausen 1986; Maelfait et al. 1990; Churchill 1997). In Argentina, research on ecological aspects of communities of spiders associated with natural (Corronca and Abdala 1994; Ávalos et al. 2005; Grismado 2007; Rubio et al. 2008; Ferretti et al. 2010a) and altered areas (Beltramo et al. 2006; Ávalos et al. 2007; Armendano and Gonzalez 2010) has been conducted, but knowledge gaps still exist for most of the natural areas. Moreover, there is no data on ecological aspects of the spider community in the Ventania system. Mygalomorph spiders are distributed worldwide and are well represented in the Neotropical region, although their ecology and natural history have mainly been studied in the Neartic (Baerg 1958; Minch 1979; Coyle and O'Shear 1981) and Australian regions (Main 1987; Jackson and Pollard 1990; Kotzman 1990). Studies regarding ecological aspects of mygalomorphs in the Neotropical region were done by Pérez-Miles et al. (1993) and Ferretti et al. (2010a). Many species of Mygalomorphae have long life cycles, living for 15–30 years and requiring 5– 6 years to reach reproductive maturity (Main 1978). Moreover, they are habitat specialists and females are sedentary (Main 1987; Coyle and Icenogle 1994), promoting geographic fragmentation over space and time and small geographic distributions (Bond et al. 2006).

The “Ernesto Tornquist” Strict Nature Reserve is located in the Ventania system and was created in 1937 to preserve this unique upland ecosystem, which contains native fauna and flora including many endemic species. From an ecological point of view, the Natural Reserve in this hilly system is one of the last relicts of more or less well—conserved areas in the Pampas ecoregion where several endemic taxa and habitat types can be found (Zalba and Cozzani 2004). The Ventania system is at the limit of the two phytogeographic provinces of Pampa and Espinal, and is home to more than 400 native plant species (Kristensen and Frangi 1995a), many of which are endemic and face extinction risks (i.e., Polygala ventanensis and Senecio Leucopeplus) (Villamil et al. 1996; Delucchi 2006). Because it is a protected area, it is imperative to know the biological diversity being preserved. Although there have been many studies on faunal diversity and conservation in the Ventania system, most were conducted on vertebrates (Cozzani et al. 2004, 2007; Di Giácomo 2005; Doiny Cabré and Lejarraga 2007; Cozzani and Zalba 2009) and insects (Konopko et al. 2009).

The Ventania system is a hilly environment located in southwestern Buenos Aires, Argentina. It includes a 180 km long × 50 km wide mountain belt running northwest to southwest, and is composed of basement and sedimentary cover that can be divided into three groups: the Curamalal, Ventana, and Pillahuincó (Figure 1). Deformational episodes occurred during the Upper Devonian and Permian (Sellés-Martínez 2001; Gregory et al. 2005). Although the specifics of the development of this mountain range remain in controversy, the similarities between the surfaces and weathering products of the Buenos Aires ranges and the corresponding features of Cape Province in South Africa suggest a common Gondwanic origin for both landscapes (Keidel 1916; Du Toit 1927). The mountains that form the Ventania range culminate at varying altitudes and correspond to differentially uplifted blocks. Undulating between 800 and 900 m a.s.l. in midrange, it rises by 150 m in the southern part of the Sierra de la Ventana, where it is dominated by a few summits of up to 1240 m a.s.l., and descends to approximately 700 m in the north (Demoulin et al. 2005). The purpose of this paper is to assess the diversity, abundance, spatial distribution, and phenology of a mygalomorph spider community at the “Ernersto Tornquist” Strict Nature Reserve.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The study area is located in the Ventania system in southwestern Buenos Aires, Argentina, at an elevation of 650 m above sea level. The “Ernesto Tornquist” Strict Nature Reserve (38° 00'-38° 07' S and 61°52'-62° 03' W) is located inside this hilly system (Figure 1), and has an area of approximately 6700 ha. The topography ranges from steep slopes at high elevations of the mountain system to gentler slopes at lower levels (piedmont). The climate is humid and temperate with an average annual rainfall of 850 mm that decreases from NE to SW during fall and spring. Rainfall increases with altitude, from 745 mm at the lowest altitude to 828 mm at peaks (Pérez and Frangi 2000). The mean annual temperature is 14.5 °C and similarly decreases from northeast to south. An altitudinal gradient of temperature is evident inside this hilly system, showing a decrease of 6.9 °C per 1000 m (Kristensen and Frangi 1995b). The natural vegetation consists of more than 400 native species with high endemism. On grassland slopes, species such Briza subaristata, Stipa ambigua, S. caudata, and S. neesiana are common. Paspalum quadrifarium covers the humid slopes, and endemic gramineous species such as Festuca ventanicola, F. pampeana, and Stipa pampeana are present above 500 m a.s.l. (Frangi and Bottino 1995). The average monthly temperature and rainfall changes during the study period (Figures 2 and 3) were obtained from a station located at the base of the hill “Cerro Bahía Blanca” at 2 km from the study site. Temperature and precipitation measurements were recorded daily and compiled into monthly totals.

Spider sampling and identification

Samples were taken monthly from October 2009 to October 2010. Two techniques were used: hand capture and pitfall trapping. Traps were arranged in a line of 10 placed each 10 m along a transect of 100 m parallel to the longest axis of a grassland slope with native vegetation (Figure 4). Pitfall traps consisted of cylindrical plastic containers 23 cm in diameter and 15 cm in height buried and covered with a plastic roof supported by three metallic rods 15 cm above the soil. They were filled with 1500 mL of ethylene glycol, which prevented evaporation and acted as a preservative. All traps were examined every 30 days and were refilled.

Spiders were hand collected by searching in potential cryptozoic refuges such as under rocks, logs, and dung. Spiders were collected in successive and adjacent transects involving three strips measuring 250 m long and 3 m wide for each collector each month. These strips were 100 m away from the pitfall line and were displaced 100 m from each other. Hand collecting involved three collectors, and each spending approximately four hours in each plot. The sampling area included approximately 0.5 ha of native grassland slopes.

Spiders were separated from debris, washed, and stored in 70% ethanol. Specimens were identified at the species level following Holmberg (1882), Schiapelli and Gerschman (1960, 1970), Goloboff (1995), Raven (1985), Ferretti et al. (2010b). Actinopus sp.1 constituted the only morphospecies that could not be identified at the species level. Voucher specimens will be deposited in the Museo de La Plata, División Entomología in Argentina.

Statistical analyses

Normality and homogeneity of variances were evaluated with Levene and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were made to compare the abundances of spiders between sampling seasons. Pearson correlation was used to explore possible linear relationships of abundance with temperature and precipitation. All statistical analyses were performed using PAST version 1.89 (Hammer et al. 2001). To determine the effect of sample abundance on sample richness, the rarefaction was made using EstimateS v8.0 (Colwell 2006) based on the number of individuals (Gotelli and Colwell 2001).

Results

Taxonomic composition, species richness and demographic structure

In total, 426 individuals of Mygalomorphae were collected during the sampling period: 349 were collected by hand capture and 77 by pitfall traps (these values do not include juveniles found with mothers). The species recorded in the study area belong to four families: Actinopus sp.1 (Actinopodidae); Grammostola vachoni Schiapelli and Gerschman 1960 and Plesiopelma longisternale (Schiapelli and Gerschman 1942) (Theraphosidae); Acanthogonatus centralis Goloboff 1995 (Nemesiidae); and Mecicobothrium thorelli Holmberg 1882 (Mecicobothriidae). The absolute and relative frequencies of individuals collected by hand capture and with pitfall traps are shown in Table 1. Grammostola vachoni clearly was the dominant species in hand capture, constituting more than 50% of collected individuals. In pitfall traps, the dominant species was A. centralis, representing 75.32% of individuals recorded (Table 1).The number of species achieved by the sample techniques was five species and four species with hand capture and pitfall traps, respectively; M. thorelli was not found in any traps. Hand capture was more efficient for the theraphosids G. vachoni and P. longisternale, and was clearly effective for M. thorelli (Mecicobothriidae) (Figure 5). Both techniques were effective to capture A. centralis (Nemesiidae), and pitfall traps were more efficient for Actinopus sp.1 (Actinopodidae) (Figure 5).The rarefaction curve of hand captures and pitfall traps based on individual number (Figure 6) showed that more than 50% of species were recorded after collecting approximately 30 individuals. The total number of species was achieved after collecting approximately 200 individuals.

Table 1.

Absolute and relative frequencies of mygalomorph spiders collected by hand capture and pitfall traps in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve.

t01_01.gif

With hand capture, juveniles clearly prevailed over adults, with a 70.77% of the individuals collected. However, in pitfall traps, adults (83.1%) prevailed over juveniles. Males were most frequent in pitfall traps, representing 75.32% of the total, while females and juveniles were less frequent at 7.79% and 16.88%, respectively.

Seasonal variation

The seasonal analysis of hand captures and pitfall trap samples showed approximately the same abundances of spiders for spring (September, October, and November), fall (March, April, and May), and winter (June, July, and August), and a lower abundance during summer in the Southern Hemisphere (December, January, and February) (Figure 7). However, no significant differences of abundances were found between seasons (ANOVA, F = 3.44, p > 0.05). The efficiency of sampling techniques was similar in spring, fall, and winter, but in the summer the abundance of individuals recorded in pitfall traps was higher (Figure 8), although summer was the less abundant season.

The highest values of abundances of Mygalomorphae corresponded with lower values of temperatures in the study area during the sampling period, and conversely, the lower values of abundances were recorded in summer (December–February), corresponding with the highest values of temperature in the area (Figure 9) (r = —0.810, p < 0.01). Regarding the values of precipitation during the sampling period in the area, no correlation was found with abundance of mygalomorph spiders (r = —0.325, p = 0.302) (Figure 10). However, in the summer and fall, an increase in precipitation above 100 mm clearly diminished the abundance of Mygalomorphae in the study area.

Phenology

Males of A. centralis were recorded from April to November, corresponding to the end of fall, winter, and spring in the Southern Hemisphere (Figures 11 and 12). Although males of A. centralis seemed to be present during the entire sampling period, two activity periods were recorded in pitfall traps: one in April, May, and June (fall and beginning of winter), and the other in August, September, and October (end of winter and into spring). Males were recorded during months of medium and low temperatures (Figure 2) and low and high values of precipitation (Figure 3). Females and juveniles were abundant during the entire sampling period (Figures 11 and 12) excluding March. Juveniles showed higher abundance than males and females in pitfall traps during summer (January and February) (Figure 12). No males of G. vachoni were found by either hand capture or pitfall trap. Females were observed in summer (January and February) and also in May, July, and September (Figure 13). No females were captured in pitfall traps. One female of G. vachoni was found holding an egg sac during January. Juveniles were observed during the entire sampling period with a clearly active period in summer and the beginning of fall (Figures 13 and 14).The highest activity for males of P. longisternale was observed from April to June (fall and beginning of winter) (Figures 15 and 16), corresponding with the lower values of temperature (Figure 2) and precipitation (Figure 3) in the study area. Females were more abundant than males but were recorded in almost the entire sampling period. Two females of P. longisternale were found with egg sacs during January. Juveniles were more abundant than males and females, with the highest activity in November (end of spring) (Figure 15). Males of Actinopus sp.1 were clearly present during April and May (fall) (Figures 17 and 18). This activity corresponded to medium temperatures (Figure 2) and low precipitation (Figure 3) in the study area. Also, this species was captured in February, March, and April (Figure 17), but at a lower abundance. In this period, the values of both temperature (Figure 2) and precipitation were higher in the area during this sampling period (Figure 3). Females were less abundant and were observed in fall (Figure 17). In March, one female was found in a burrow with 12 juveniles that had recently emerged from the egg sac.

Mecicobothrium thorelli was collected from June to September (winter and beginning of spring) (Figure 19). Males showed one clear activity period in June corresponding with low temperature (Figure 2) and precipitation in the study area. Females were recorded in June and July. Juveniles were recorded from June to September (Figure 19) (September showed higher value of precipitation) (Figure 3).

Discussion

The species richness recorded in the study area was similar to that found in other areas from Argentina (Ávalos et al. 2005; Ferretti et al. 2010a), and also from other Neotropical areas such as Amazonia (Höfer 1990), Bolivia (Sandoval 2005), and Uruguay (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993), ranging from four to six mygalomorph species. The number of species recorded in the study area was underestimated due to the absence of the species Calathotarsus simoni (Migidae), cited on Sierra de la Ventana and Tandil. This species is a trap—door spider, with scarce records in Museum collections. The only contributions about C. simoni (Schiapelli and Gerschman 1973, 1975) explained that specimens were found on a hilly slope where they construct their trap—doors covered with moss and ferns, making them extremely difficult to be located by collectors. It is possible that C. simoni may be absent in the study area; however, one male and many females were previously collected approximately 3 km from this area (Schiapelli and Gerschman 1975).

Obtaining 50% of the species with a low number of samplings, and the achievement of the total number of species by adding a few sampling dates in both techniques, indicates a relatively good sampling for the studied area despite the absence of C. simoni. The high abundances of G. vachoni and P. longisternale found via hand collection are explained by the greater efficacy of this method for finding species that live under stones, fallen trees, and dung; these species do not fall into pitfall traps, requiring more active searching (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Ferretti et al. 2010a). The juveniles of these theraphosid species prevailed over the adults in hand capture. This proportion probably reflects the extended juvenile stage, or the longevity of females and the short lifespan of adult males (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Costa and PérezMiles 2002; Ferretti et al. 2010a), as well as their cryptic habitat during this stage and small expansion range around burrows (PérezMiles et al. 1993; Shillington and McEwen 2006). The low abundances of theraphosid species in pitfall traps also could be explained by the presence of adherent organs on tarsi (claw tufts and scopulate) and their “cautious” locomotion (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993).

In the nemesiid A. centralis, the similar captures by hand and traps is probably explained by high individual motility. A high motility of the nemesiid species, Stenoterommata platensis, was observed on Martin Garcia Island (Argentina) (Ferretti et al. 2010a). The trap—door spider Actinopus sp. 1 also showed high captures in pitfall traps, but involved only wandering males. This is typical for trap—door species that are difficult to collect by hand capture (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Indicatti et al. 2005; Ferretti et al. 2010a). Mecicobothrium thorelli, also a cryptic species, was collected only by hand capture and appears to be a species with low motility. Males and juveniles of M. thorelli were recorded in pitfall traps next to a stream in a typical hill of Uruguay (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993). This species occupies habitats with high values of humidity (Costa and PérezMiles 1998). Moreover, in Uruguay, M. thorelli was found under stones, roots, and trunks in hilly areas of a streamside forest, as these spiders are highly sensitive to humidity variations (Costa and Pérez-Miles 1998). Pitfall traps in our study were not placed next to a stream, thus explaining the possible absence of this species by this method. However, M. thorelli was found occupying large stones on a grassland slope, but not in proximity to streams, appearing to be more tolerant to drier habitats in this study area.

Although no significant differences were found in mygalomorph abundances between seasons, summer was the period with lower abundance. This could be due to high values of temperature and precipitation (above 100 mm) in the study area creating unstable conditions, alternating between dry and humid periods. Moreover, the high proportion of individuals captured in pitfall traps occurred in the summer (more than 30%), which could be due to greater transit of individuals in relation with more prey availability in the area (Uetz 1976; Riechert and Luczark 1982).

Phenology

The presence of walking males of mygalomorph spiders comprises an indicator of the mating period (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Ferretti et al. 2010a). The highest activity periods for males of A. centralis were recorded from the end of fall, winter, and spring, having two clear activity peaks. Other nemesiids, such Stenoterommata spp. in Uruguay and Brazil, also showed sexual activity peaks in the fall and spring (PérezMiles et al. 1993; Indicatti et al. 2008). However, S. platensis on Martin Garcia Island (Argentina) has their reproductive period in summer and fall (Ferretti et al. 2010a). Females were abundant in summer in pitfall traps, and via hand capture were abundant in fall, winter, and spring. The activity peak of females in the summer was also observed for S. platensis on Martin Garcia Island (Ferretti et al. 2010a). The presence of small juveniles in pitfall traps during summer (December and January) could indicate the emergence of juveniles and dispersion stages at this period (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Reichling 2000; Shillington and McEwen 2006).

Unfortunately, no males of G. vachoni were recorded on the study area. Females showed an even seasonal distribution with hand capture and were absent in pitfall traps. Juveniles were abundant in January (summer) and March (fall), indicating the emerging and dispersion stage as was found for other theraphosid species (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Ferretti et al. 2010a). Moreover, the presence of a female holding an egg sac in a warmer month (January) supported this hypothesis.

The other theraphosid species recorded in the study area, P. longisternale, showed one clear activity peak, with males being abundant in the fall and beginning of winter. This activity period could be the same for P. longisternale in Uruguay, where one male was recorded in May by hand capture (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993). These authors did not record males of P. longisternale in pitfall traps, perhaps because the traps they used were smaller than in our study (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993). Males of P. longisternale were recorded in pitfall traps using wider traps. The winter activity peak could be a mechanism to avoid potential predators that show low frequencies and activity during this period (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Ferretti et al. 2010a). Females and juveniles showed an even seasonal distribution and were absent in pitfall traps. The presence of females holding egg sacs during January suggested the same emergence and dispersion stage period as the other theraphosid recorded, G. vachoni; thus, a strong interspecific competition for resources such as burrows and prey are expected between juveniles of these species.

Males of Actinopus sp. showed two activity periods, with a period of higher abundance in the fall and lesser one in the summer. Sexual activity in the fall could be the same as that registered for other Actinopus spp. in Uruguay and on Martin Garcia Island (Argentina) (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Ferretti et al. 2010a). However, in our study area, two males were captured in summer (February). This may support the hypothesis of two different species, but a taxonomical review of the genus Actinopus in Argentina is needed. A female found with spiderlings in March and also other found with her offspring by Ferretti et al. (2010a) in spring (October) additionally supports the existence of two species of Actinopus in Buenos Aires province.

Mecicobothrium thorelli was the species with the more restricted activity period during the sampling, being abundant in winter but also found in early spring. Males were found exclusively in June (winter), one of the cooler months in the study area. Adult males were found from May to September, with a peak of activity in July (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993). These authors interpreted the winter activity as a means to avoid predation, and this could be operating in the same way for this species in the study area. Females were also abundant in June and July (winter), and juveniles showed an activity peak in September (beginning of spring), maybe the emergence period of spiderlings. Females of M. thorelli made egg sacs in August and September, and juveniles emerge after a month of the egg sac construction (Costa and Pérez-Miles 1998).

Overall, the Mygalomorphae of the Ventania system comprises an important group of sedentary and cryptozoic spiders that seem to be highly dependent on habitat type and environmental factors. The diversity and abundance of these spiders in the study area is higher in relation to other areas (Pérez-Miles et al. 1993; Ávalos et al. 2005; Ferretti et al. 2010a), and the microclimatic conditions (Kristensen and Frangi 1995a, 1995b) and vegetation (Lizzi et al. 2007) of the hilly system of Ventania could provide a suitable habitat for these cryptozoic species. The present study constitutes the first on the Mygalomorphae spider community in the Strict Nature Reserve “Ernesto Tornquist” in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Moreover, the knowledge of spider fauna on this Natural Reserve could help in the preservation of natural grassland habitats. This area is important, because to ensure the conservation of regional diversity, further studies on natural grassland habitats such as this one will prove necessary to inform management and conservation decisions.

Figure 1.

Geologic map of Ventania (modified from Suero 1972) showing the location of the “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve, where the study was carried out. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Figure 2.

Average monthly temperature of the “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.jpg

Figure 3.

Rainfall amounts at the “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve. High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.jpg

Figure 4.

Typical grassland slopes in the “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve where the array of pitfall traps was located. High quality figures are available online.

f04_01.jpg

Figure 5.

Relative abundances of mygalomorph spiders collected by hand capture and pitfall traps in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve. Ac, Acanthogonatus centralis; Gv, Grammostola vachoni; Pl, Plesiopelma longisternale; At, Actinopus sp.1; Mt, Mecicobothrium thorelli. High quality figures are available online.

f05_01.jpg

Figure 6.

Rarefaction curve of hand capture and pitfall traps in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve based on number of individual of mygalomorph spiders. High quality figures are available online.

f06_01.jpg

Figure 7.

Seasonal abundance of mygalomorph spiders collected. High quality figures are available online.

f07_01.jpg

Figure 8.

Seasonal abundance of mygalomorph spiders collected by hand capture and pitfall traps in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve. High quality figures are available online.

f08_01.jpg

Figure 9.

Monthly abundance of mygalomorph spiders with the monthly average temperature in the “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve. High quality figures are available online.

f09_01.jpg

Figure 10.

Monthly abundance of spiders with the rainfall amounts in the “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve during the sampling period. High quality figures are available online.

f10_01.jpg

Figure 11.

Acanthogonatus centralis. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve by hand capture. High quality figures are available online.

f11_01.jpg

Figure 12.

Acanthogonatus centralis. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve using pitfall traps. High quality figures are available online.

f12_01.jpg

Figure 13.

Grammostola vachoni. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve by hand capture. High quality figures are available online.

f13_01.jpg

Figure 14.

Grammostola vachoni. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve using pitfall traps. High quality figures are available online.

f14_01.jpg

Figure 15.

Plesiopelma longisternale. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve by hand capture. High quality figures are available online.

f15_01.jpg

Figure 16.

Plesiopelma longisternale. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve using pitfall traps. High quality figures are available online.

f16_01.jpg

Figure 17.

Actinopus sp.1. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve. Hand captured. High quality figures are available online.

f17_01.jpg

Figure 18.

Actinopus sp.1. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve captured in pitfall traps. High quality figures are available online.

f18_01.jpg

Figure 19.

Mecicobothrium thorelli. Phenology based on specimen activity (individuals/month) in “Ernesto Tornquist” Natural Reserve. High quality figures are available online.

f19_01.jpg

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Direction of Protected Natural Areas (La Plata) and OPDS (Organismo Provincial para el Desarrollo Sostenible) for the authorization to work in the Parque Provincial “Ernesto Tornquist” (Ventania). Thanks to the Park Rangers Maximiliano D'Onofrio, Facundo Cassalle-Pintos, and Anibal Areco for assistance in field work. The authors wish to thank Mercedes Gutierrez and Natalia Stefanazzi for their help with pitfall traps. N.F. was supported by a CONICET fellowship.

References

1.

A Armendano , A. González 2010. Comunidad de aranas (Arachnida, Araneae) del cultivo de alfalfa (Medicago sativa) en Buenos Aires, Argentina. Revista de Biología Tropical 58(2): 757–767. Google Scholar

2.

G Ávalos, GD Rubio, ME Bar, MP Damborsky, EB Oscherov . 2005. Composición y distribución de la araneofauna del Iberá. Resúmenes de las Comunicaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Univ. Nacional del Nordeste. Available online,  http://www.unne.edu.ar/Web/cyt/com2005/6Biologia/B-056.pdf  Google Scholar

3.

G Ávalos , GD Rubio , ME Bar , A. Gonzalez 2007. Aranas (Arachnida: Araneae) asociadas a dos bosques degradados del Chaco húmedo en Corrientes, Argentina. Revista de Biología Tropical 55: 899–909. Google Scholar

4.

WJ. Baerg 1958. The Tarantula. University of Kansas Press. Google Scholar

5.

J Beltramo , I Bertolaccini , A. González 2006. Spiders of soybean crops in Santa Féprovince, Argentina: Influence of surrounding spontaneous vegetation on lot colonization. Brazilian Journal of Biology 66(3): 891–898. Google Scholar

6.

JE Bond , DA Beamer , T Lamb , M. Hedin 2006. Combining genetic and geospatial analyses to infer population extinction in mygalomorph spiders endemic to the Los Angeles region. Animal Conservation 9: 145– 157. Google Scholar

7.

DF Candiani , RP Indicatti , AD. Brescovit 2005. Composição e diversidae da araneofauna (Araneae) de Serapilheira em tres florestas urbanas na cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 5(1): 1–13. Google Scholar

8.

TB. Churchill 1997. Effects of sampling method on composition of a Tasmanian coastal heathland spider assemblages. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 33: 475– 481. Google Scholar

9.

IH. Clausen 1986. The use of spiders (Araneae) as ecological indicators. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 7: 83–86. Google Scholar

10.

RK Colwell . 2006. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8. Available online,  purl.oclc.org/estimates  Google Scholar

11.

JA Corronca , CS. Abdala 1994. La fauna araneológica de la Reserva Ecológica “E1 Bagual”, Formosa, Argentina. Aracnología 9: 1–6. Google Scholar

12.

FG Costa , F. Pérez-Miles 1998. Behavior, life cycle, and webs of Mecicobothrium thorelli. Journal of Arachnology 26: 317–329. Google Scholar

13.

FG Costa , F. Pérez-Miles 2002. Reproductive biology of Uruguayan theraphosids (Araneae, Theraphosidae). Journal of Arachnology 30: 571–587. Google Scholar

14.

FA Coyle , WA. O'Shear 1981. Observations on the natural history of Sphodros abboti and Sphodros rufipes (Araneae, Atypidae), with evidence for a contact sex pheromone. Journal of Arachnology 9: 317–326. Google Scholar

15.

FA Coyle , WR. Icenogle 1994. Natural history of the California trapdoor spider genus Aliatypus (Araneae, Antrodiaetidae). Journal of Arachnology 22: 225–255. Google Scholar

16.

N Cozzani , S. Zalba 2009. Estructura de la vegetación y selección de hábitats reproductivos en aves del pastizal pampeano. Ecología Austral 19: 35–44. Google Scholar

17.

N Cozzani , R Sánchez , SM. Zalba 2004. Nidificación de la loica pampeana (Sturnella defilippii) en la provincia de Buenos Aires. Hornero 19: 47–52. Google Scholar

18.

N Cozzani , SM Zalba , E Mattos , R. Sarria 2007. Nidificación del Jilguero Austral (Sicalis lebruni) en Sierra de la Ventana, provincia de Buenos Aires. Nuestras Aves 53: 21–23. Google Scholar

19.

G. Delucchi 2006. Las especies vegetales amenazadas de la provincia de Buenos Aires: Una actualización. APRONA 39: 19–31. Google Scholar

20.

A Demoulin , M Zarate , J. Rabassa 2005. Long—term landscape development: a perspective from the southern Buenos Aires ranges of east central Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Science 19: 193–204. Google Scholar

21.

MF Dias , AD Brescovit , M. Menezes 2005. Aranhas de solo (Arachnida: Araneae) em diferentes fragmentos florestais no sul da Bahia, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 5(1): 141–150. Google Scholar

22.

Giacomo AS. Di 2005. Areas Importantes para la Conservación de las Aves en Argentina. Sitios prioritarios para la conservación de la biodiversidad. Temas de naturaleza y conservación. Aves argentinas 5: 1–514. Google Scholar

23.

Cabré PC Doiny , L. Lejarraga 2007. Aves de Sierra de la Ventana. Published by the author. Bahía Bianca, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Google Scholar

24.

AL. Du Toit 1927. A Geological Comparison of South America with South Africa. Carnegie Institution. Google Scholar

25.

N Ferretti , F Pérez-Miles , A. González 2010a. Mygalomorph spiders of the Natural and Historical Reserve of Martin Garcia Island, Rio de la Plata River, Argentina. Zoological Studies 49(4): 481–491. Google Scholar

26.

N Ferretti , G Pompozzi , S Copperi , A González , F. Pérez-Miles 2010b. Arañas Mygalomorphae de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: clave para la determinación de especies. Bioscriba 3(1): 15–34. Google Scholar

27.

JL Frangi , OJ. Bottino 1995. Comunidades vegetales de la Sierra de la Ventana, Provincia de Buenos Aires. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (La Plata) 71: 93–133. Google Scholar

28.

PA. Goloboff 1995. A revision of the South American spiders of the family Nemesiidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae). Part I: Species from Peru, Chile, Argentina and Uruguay. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 224: 1–189. Google Scholar

29.

NJ Gotelli , RK. Colwell 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379–391. Google Scholar

30.

DA Gregory , VL López , LE. Grecco 2005. A Late Proterozoic—Early Paleozoic magmatic cycle in Sierra de la Ventana, Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Science 19: 155–171. Google Scholar

31.

C. Grismado 2007. Comunidades de aranas de la Réserva Natural Otamendi, Provincia de Buenos Aires. Riqueza específica y Diversidad. Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad CAECE. Google Scholar

32.

O Hammer, DAT Harper, PD. Ryan 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontología Electrónica 4(1): 9. Google Scholar

33.

H. Höfer 1990. The spider community (Araneae) of a Central Amazonian blackwater inundation forest (Igapó). Acta Zoologica Fennica 190: 173–179. Google Scholar

34.

E. Holmberg 1882. Observations a propos de sous-ordre des araingnées territelaires (Territelaire). Boletín Académico Argentino 4: 153–174. Google Scholar

35.

RP Indicatti , DF Candiani , AD Brescovit , HF. Japyassú 2005. Diversidade de aranhas (Arachnida, Araneae) de solo na bacia do reservatório do Guarapiranga, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 5: 1–12. Google Scholar

36.

RP Indicatti , SM Lucas , R Ott , AD. Brescovit 2008. Litter dwelling mygalomorph spiders (Araneae: Microstigmatidae, Nemesiidae) from Araucaria Forests in southern Brazil, with the description of five new species. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 25: 529–546. Google Scholar

37.

RR Jackson , SD. Pollard 1990. Intraspecific interactions and the function of courtship in mygalomorph spiders: a study of Porrothele antipodiana (Araneae, Hexathelidae) and a literature review. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 17: 499–526. Google Scholar

38.

M. Kotzman 1990. Annual activity patterns of the Australian tarantula Selenoscomia stirlingi (Araneae, Theraphosidae) in an arid area. Journal of Arachnology 18: 123–130. Google Scholar

39.

J. Keidel 1916. La geología de las sierras de la Provincia de Buenos Aires y sus relaciones con las montañas de Sud-África y los Andes. Anales del Ministerio de Agricultura de la Nación. Geología, Mineralogía y Minería 9(3): 1–78. Google Scholar

40.

SA Konopko , SA Mazzuconni , Ruf ML López , AO. Bachman 2009. Los heterópteros acuáticos y semiacuáticos del Parque Provincial Ernesto Tornquist (Provincia de Buenos Aires, República Argentina). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 68(34): 271–282. Google Scholar

41.

MJ Kristensen , JL. Frangi 1995a. La Sierra de La Ventana: una isla de biodiversidad. Ciencia Hoy 5: 25–34. Google Scholar

42.

MJ Kristensen , JL. Frangi 1995b. Mesoclimas de pastizales de la Sierra de la Ventana. Ecología Austral 5: 55–64. Google Scholar

43.

JM Lizzi , MF Garbulsky , RA Golluscio , AV. Deregibus 2007. Mapeo indirecto de la vegetación de Sierra de la Ventana, provincia de Buenos Aires. Ecología Austral 17: 217– 230. Google Scholar

44.

J Maelfait , R Jocque , L Baert , K. Descender 1990. Heathland management and spiders. Acta Zoologica Fennica 190: 261–266. Google Scholar

45.

BY. Main 1978. Biology of the arid—adapted Australian trapdoor spider Anidiops villosus (rainbow). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 4: 161–175. Google Scholar

46.

BY. Main 1987. Ecological disturbance and conservation of spiders: implications for biogeographic relics in southwestern Australia. In: J Majer , Editor. The Role of Invertebrates in Conservation and Biological Surveys , pp. 89–98. Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management Report. Google Scholar

47.

EW. Minch 1979. Burrow entrance plugging behavior in the tarantula Aphonopelma chalcodes Chamberlin (Araneae: Theraphosidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 4: 414–415. Google Scholar

48.

MA Pinkus-Rendón , JL León-Cortés , G. IbarraNúñez 2006. Spider diversity in a tropical habitat gradient in Chiapas, Mexico. Diversity and Distributions 12: 61–69. Google Scholar

49.

CA Pérez , JL. Frangi 2000. Grassland biomass dynamics an altitudinal gradient in the Pampa. Journal of Range Management 53: 518–528. Google Scholar

50.

F Pérez-Miles, FG Costa, E. Gudynas 1993. Ecología de una comunidad de Mygalomorphae criptozoicas de Sierra de las Animas, Uruguay (Arachnida, Araneae). Aracnología 17–18: 1–22. Google Scholar

51.

LR Podgaiski , R Ott , EN Lopes-Rodriguez , EH Buckup , MA. Marques 2007. Araneofauna (Arachnida; Araneae) do Parque Estadual do Turvo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 7(2): 197–211 Google Scholar

52.

J Raizer , HF Japyassú , RP Indicatti , AD. Brescovit 2005. Comunidade de aranhas (Arachnida, Araneae) do pantanal norte (Mato Grosso, Brasil) e sua similaridade com a araneofauna amazónica. Biota Neotropica 5(1): 125–140. Google Scholar

53.

RJ. Raven 1985. The spider infraorder Mygalomorphae (Araneae): cladistics and systematics. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 182: 1–180. Google Scholar

54.

SB. Reichling 2000. Group dispersal in juvenile Brachypelma vagans (Araneae, Theraphosidae). Journal of Arachnology 28: 248–250. Google Scholar

55.

SE Riechert, J. Luczak 1982. Spider foraging: behavioral responses to prey. In: PN Witt, JS Rovner , Editors. Spider Communication. Mechanisms and Ecological Significance , pp. 353–385. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar

56.

GD Rubio , JA Corronca , MP. Damborsky 2008. Do spider diversity and assemblages change in different contiguous habitats? A case study in the protected habitats of the Humid Chaco ecoregion, north—east Argentina. Environmental Entomology 37: 419–430. Google Scholar

57.

LC. Sandoval 2005. Reporte sobre la riqueza de arañas (Araneae) en tres tipos de vegetación de la reserva municipal Valle de Tucavaca. Kempffiana 1: 79–85 Google Scholar

58.

RD Schiapelli , BS. Gerschman de Pikelin 1942. Arañas argentinas (1° parte). Anales del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Entomología 40(160): 317–332. Google Scholar

59.

RD Schiapelli , de Pikelin BS. Gerschman 1960. Las especies del género Grammostola Simon, 1892 en la Republica Argentina. Actas Trabajos Congreso Sudamericano de Zoología 1(3): 199–208. Google Scholar

60.

RD Schiapelli , BS. Gerschman de Pikelin 1970. El género Ceropelma Mello-Leitão 1923 (Araneae: Theraphosidae). Physis 30(80): 225–239. Google Scholar

61.

RD Schiapelli , BS. Gerschman de Pikelin 1973. La familia Migidae Simon 1892, en la Argentina (Araneae, Theraphosomorphae). Physis 32(55): 289–294. Google Scholar

62.

RD Schiapelli , BS. Gerschman de Pikelin 1975. Calathotarsus simoni sp. nov. (Araneae, Migidae). Physis 34(88): 17–21. Google Scholar

63.

J. Selléz-Martínez 2001. The geology of Ventania (Buenos Aires province, Argentina). Journal of Iberian Geology 27: 43–69. Google Scholar

64.

C Shillington , B. McEwen 2006. Activity of juvenile tarantulas in and around the maternal burrow. Journal of Arachnology 34: 261–265. Google Scholar

65.

T. Suero 1972. Compilación geológica de las Sierras Australes de la provincia de Buenos Aires. In: J Ulibarrena , Editor. Ministerio de Obras Publicas (La Plata), Laboratorio de Ensayo de Materiales, Serie II 216: 138–147. Google Scholar

66.

GW. Uetz 1976. Gradient analysis of spider communities in a streamside forest. Oecologia 22: 373–385. Google Scholar

67.

CB Villamil, G Delucchi, A. Long 1996. Cincuenta especies prioritarias para su conservación en la provincia de Buenos Aires. Resúmenes XXV Jornadas Argentinas de Botánica: 517, Mendoza, Argentina. Google Scholar

68.

SM Zalba , NC. Cozzani 2004. The impact of feral horses on grassland bird communities in Argentina. Animal Conservation 7: 35–44. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Nelson Ferretti, Gabriel Pompozzi, Sofia Copperi, Fernando Pérez-Miles, and Alda González "Mygalomorph Spider Community of a Natural Reserve in a Hilly System in Central Argentina," Journal of Insect Science 12(31), 1-16, (18 February 2012). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.012.3101
Received: 19 April 2011; Accepted: 1 July 2011; Published: 18 February 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
16 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top