Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2013 Similarity of Body Size in Queens of the Wood ant Formica aquilonia from Optimal and Sub-Optimal Habitats Indicates a Strong Heritable Component
Marja-Katariina Haatanen, Jouni Sorvari
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Body size in animals is affected by both genes and the environment (e.g., the amount of food resources). In ants, body size is related to several traits in an individual's physiology and life history. For example, a large queen may increase offspring production, thus increasing her overall fitness. In this study, whether sub-optimal environmental conditions affect the body size of queens of the red wood ant, Formica aquilonia Yarrow (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). The sizes (head width in mm) of virgin queens, i.e., gynes, originating from forest interiors (resource rich) and from commercial forest clear-cuts (resource poor) were measured. No differences in the body size of the queens from the two habitats were found. In addition, the within-nest variation in queen size was similar between habitat types. The results indicate that the body size variation of F. aquilonia queens is not sensitive to environmental variation, unlike F. aquilonia workers. The lack of environmental variation in queen size in F. aquilonia may be due to a strong selection in the past to monomorphic size in this obligately polygynous (multi-queened) species.

Introduction

The phenotype of an organism is a consequence of both the genes it inherits and the environment in which those genes are expressed. Although the genotype determines the developmental limits of an individual, an individual's phenotype is usually also the result of many environmental influences (Metcalfe and Monanghan 2001). For example, food availability is a very important environmental factor affecting the growth of an individual animal (Zanette et al. 2000; Hemmi and Jormalainen 2002).

Social insects provide a challenge and an opportunity to examine the effects of environmental and genetic factors on the phenotype of an individual. Social insects and their body size variation are particularly interesting because of their complex social organization, which includes at least 2 morphologically different female castes, i.e., workers and queens (Wilson 1971; Kovacs et al. 2009). It is very common, particularly in ants and termites, for workers to be sizepolymorphic, or their size distribution to be unimodal yet highly variable (Wilson 1971). In addition, several ant species have queens that are highly variable or dimorphic in size (e.g., Howard 2006; Rosset and Chapuisat 2007).

Large body size makes a difference in the life of a social insect. Among queens, large body size has been associated with better survival, better immune defense, and higher reproductive success (Beekman et al. 1998; Wiernasz and Cole 2003; Fjerdingstad and Keller 2004; Sorvari et al. 2008). In addition, large male ants may have better mating success than smaller ones (Abell et al. 1999; Wiernasz et al. 2001). Previous studies have shown that body size in ant workers is associated with survival in harsh conditions (Lighton et al. 1994; Fournier et al. 2007; Clémencet et al.2010).

While adult body size in ants is often strongly influenced by environmental factors, genes are also involved. The size of ant workers in Formica truncorum, F. podzolica, and Cataglyphis cursor appears to be largely environmentally determined (Deslippe and Savolainen 1995; Bargum et al. 2004; Fournier et al. 2007). Conversely, it has been found that body size in the workers of Leptothorax acervorum is to some extent genetically determined, although it may follow different reaction norms in different populations (Heinze et al. 2003). Similarly, there was a strong maternal effect on the body size of workers of the acorn ant, Temnothorax curvispinosus (Linksvayer 2006). In addition, whether workers develop into minor or major workers seems to be linked with genes in the Australian sugar ant, Camponotus consobrinus (Fraser et al. 2000), and likely also in other ants with polymorphic workers.

Body size in queens also seems to be strongly genetically determined in some ant species, but more environmental in some other species. For example, indicating stronger genetic determination, the size of Formica podzolica queens was similar between high and low quality habitats (Deslippe and Savolainen 1994), and there seemed to be a strong maternal effect in the size of queens in the queensize dimorphic species Temnothorax rugatulus (Rüppell et al. 2001a) and the monomorphic T. curvispinosus (Linksvayer 2006). Further, significant heritability for F. truncorum queen size was found in one study year, but not in another, indicating that under certain circumstances environmental factors may override the influence of genes (Bargum et al. 2004). Concurrent genetic and environ mental effects on queen size variation have also been found in the ant Lasius niger (Fjerdingstad 2005). Finally, it was found that a protein-rich diet increased the size of the queens, workers, and males produced in the ant Linepithema humile (Aron et al. 2001). Therefore, it seems that the relative roles of environment and genes on body size determination may depend on both the species and caste.

Although environment does not always seem to be the stronger determining factor in regulating the body size of queens, it is particularly interesting to investigate whether striking differences in habitat quality, e.g., forest versus forest clear-cut, might make a difference, because body size may be linked with better survival, reproductive success, and immune defense. Forest clear-cutting is the most common forest harvesting method in Finland. This deforestation radically decreases the habitat quality of wood ants. Clear-cutting seems to cause food resource limitation for wood ants, especially for the red wood ants of Formica rufa group (Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2009; Sorvari et al. 2011). In addition, both the micro-climate and uppermost soil layers may become drier in clear-cut areas (Keenan and Kimmins 1993), which may alter the temperature and humidity regulation of the mound nests of wood ants (Rosengren et al.1979; Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2009). Body size in the workers of the red wood ant Formica aquilonia Yarrow (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) is often smaller in clear-cut areas, and the small body size has been suggested to be caused by changed biotic and abiotic conditions (Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2009). In the same study, worker size was shown to increase with nest size in forests but not in clear-cut areas. Thus, clear-cutting provides an excellent opportunity to test the effects of the environment and genes on the body size of wood ant queens.

The objective of this study was to determine whether poor environmental conditions affect the body size of queens of the wood ant F.aquilonia. This was examined by comparing the sizes of young, unmated, winged queens (i.e., gynes) originating from forest interiors (food rich) and commercial forest clear-cuts (food limited). Environmental factors (i.e., lack of resources) can vary within the same habitat and thus may exert different kinds of effects upon the queens. Under food limitations, some queen larvae may become poorly fed, whereas others may receive a sufficient amount of food. This may cause the withinnest variation in queen sizes to increase. Therefore, the body size variation within nests in different environments also was studied.

Materials and Methods

Study species and study area

F. aquilonia is the most common wood ant in northern European boreal forests (e.g., Punttila and Kilpeläinen 2009). It is a typical species in sparse to medium density mature forest stands and forest edges from Scotland to Siberia (Collingwood 1979; Czechowski et al. 2002). It is a highly polygynous (multiple queens) and polydomous (multiple nests) species, with large nest mounds containing over a million workers and hundreds of queens (Pamilo 1982; Rosengren et al. 1987). F. aquilonia has ecological effects over several trophic levels and is threatened by commercial forest clear-cutting, which reduces the production of sexual offspring, nest survival, and food resources (Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2005, 2007a, 2009) and creates a bias upon the sex ratio of sexual offspring (Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2007b).

The study population was located in the boreal coniferous zone in central Finland, near the town of Jyväskylä (62° 14′ N, 25° 44′ E). Sixteen separate (between distances > 1 km) bilberry, Vaccinium myrtillus L. (Ericales: Ericaceae), growth forest stands dominated by over 70 years old Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) H. Karst (Pinales: Pinaceae), were used. Eight had been logged 2–3 years before the study, whereas the remaining 8 were uncut. Of the 27 study nests, 14 were located in 8 different forest patches (more than 50 m away from the forest edges), and 13 nests in 8 different clear-cut areas. Young, unmated, winged queens (gynes) were collected by hand from the nest mound interiors (mean number of queens/nest ± 95% CL, forests: 27.3 ± 8.3, clear-cuts: 24.5 ± 8.6; F1, 25 = 0.94, p = 0.34). The relatedness among nestmate queens is usually extremely low in F. aquilonia (r is typically close to zero; Sundström et al. 2005), thus it is very likely that the sampled queens were mostly not sisters.

Measurements

Body size instead of body weight was measured because gynes gain weight after hatching from pupa (Keller and Passera 1989), thus body size better describes the morphometric growth of an individual. The maximum head width above the eyes has been used as a standard measurement of body size in ants of the genus Formica (e.g. Deslippe and Savolainen 1994; Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2009). The maximum head width of a total of 700 queens was measured using an Olympus SZ40 microscope (40 × magnification) and an Olympus 24–10/100 ocular micrometer ( www.olympus-global.com), which allowed accurate measurements to the nearest 0.05 mm.

Counting all the ants in each colony would have been impractical to estimate colony sizes. The basal diameter and area of nest mounds have been shown to correlate positively with the worker population in moundbuilding Formica ants (Seifert 1991; Liautard et al. 2003) and other Formica species (Deslippe and Savolainen 1994). Thus, the basal area of nest mounds was used to estimate the colony size. However, it is not known how strongly nest size and worker population is correlated in poor environments such as clearcuts. The shape of the nest mound base of the study species varied from near-circular to ellipsoid, therefore the basal area of each nest mound was calculated (in m2) using the following area formula for an ellipse:

e01_01.gif
where a and b represent the maximum and minimum basal diameters measured. Since the nests were not excavated to see how deep they penetrated, the nest mound volume was not investigated.

Statistical procedures

General linear mixed models with a Kenward-Roger approximation of degrees of freedom were used to analyze queen size difference and size variation difference. Due to multiple individuals from the same nest and 1 –5 nests from the same study stand (F. aquilonia forms multi-nest coalitions), the nest of origin nested within the study stand was used as a random factor in the model of head width difference between forests and clear-cuts. The effect of the random factor was tested by comparing the model with the random factor and the same model without the random factor with the likelihood ratio test (see Littell et al. 2006). In the models of nest size effect and within nest variation difference (measured as the standard deviation of head widths) between forests and clear-cuts, only the study stand was used as a random factor because each nest got only 1 value of mean and standard deviation of queen size. In the model of nest size effect, the nest mean size of queens was used because each nest got only 1 nest size. The general linear mixed models were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS statistical software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute,  www.sas.com). In addition, the similarity of size distributions of queens between habitat types was analyzed using a Kolmogorov- Smirnov (1 independent samples) test with PASW Statistics software, version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM,  www.ibm.com).

Results

The queen size, measured as head width, variedfrom 1.71 to 2.18 mm and from 1.81 to 2.24 mm in clear-cut and forest interior populations, respectively (Figure 1). Interestingly, the minimum and maximum sizes were smaller in queens from clear-cuts than those from forest interiors. However, the overall size of queens did not differ between clear-cut and forest interior populations (mixed model based least squares mean ± 95% CL: clearcuts 2.001 ± 0.03, forest interiors 2.015 ± 0.03; F1, 24.1 = 0.42, p = 0.52). The nest of origin nested within the study stand had a significant effect in the model (χ2 = 271.3, df = 1, p < 0.0001). The nest mound size (as an estimate of colony size) did not affect the colony mean queen size, and the relationship between nest size and queen size was similar in both habitat types (nest size: F1, 20.6 < 0.01, p = 0.96; interaction term habitat type X nest size: F1, 18.4 < 0.01, p = 0.99).

The within-nest size variation (SD) of queens did not differ between clear-cut and forest interior populations (mixed model based least squares mean ± 95% CL: clear-cuts 0.062 ± 0.01, forest interiors 0.057 ± 0.01; F1, 24 = 1.99, p = 0.17). The number of queens examined per nest did not affect the within-nest size variation (F1, 24 = 1.31, p = 0.26). Furthermore, the size distribution of queens was similar between the habitat types (Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z = 0.86, p = 0.45; Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Histogram of the head widths of Formica aquilonia queens originating from forest, as well as clear-cut areas. The size distribution is similar. Number of gynes and nests (respectively) in clear-cuts is 318 and 13, and in forests 382 and 14. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Discussion

It was found in a previous study that while there is a strong heritable component in the size of queens of F. truncorum (a close relative to F. aquilonia), it may be overridden by environmental conditions (Bargum et al.2004). Although forest clear-cutting is a rather strong environmental change for forestdwelling wood ants like F. aquilonia and clearly affects the size of its workers (Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2009), for some reason it did not affect the size of queens. Thus, the size of queens seems to be less sensitive to environmental variation than the size of workers in F. aquilonia. In addition, the similarity between the size variations in the 2 different habitat types gives further support to the interpreta tion that queen body size is mainly determined by some heritable component in F. aquilonia.

Because F. aquilonia normally lives in polydomous colonies, the lack of size differences could be mediated due to food sharing between neighboring nests. However, an earlier study with the same colony populations showed that the neighboring nests become competitors (Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2004). In addition, the decrease in the size of workers in clear-cuts in the same study stands (Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2009) supports the suggestion that food sharing between clear-cut nests and forest nests is not working or does not support the clear-cut nests enough.

The queen size can vary between single- and multiple-queen colonies (monogyny vs. polygyny). In many cases of socially polymorphic ant species, the queens in monogynous colonies are generally larger than those in polygynous colonies (Herbers 1984; Keller and Ross 1993; McInnes and Tschinkel 1995; Hamaguchi and Kinomura 1996; Kikuchi et al. 1999; Buschinger and Schreiber 2002; Rosset and Chapuisat 2007; Meunier and Chapuisat 2009). This, however, is not a rule in all socially polymorphic ant species (see Murase et al. 2000; Rüppell et al. 2001b).

In queen size-dimorphic species, large queens (macrogynes) are capable of establishing new colonies independently, whereas small queens (microgynes) are specialized in dependent colony founding by returning to the natal colony (leading to polygyny; e.g. McInnes and Tschinkel 1995; Rüppell et al. 2001c). This may also be a general rule in most cases of ants with size-dimorphic queens. In support, it has been found that queen body size and colony founding strategy may both be influenced by the same gene (DeHeer et al. 1999).

Large body size may be advantageous in queens that establish their colonies solitarily. Although the phenomenon has yet not been studied in queens, large body size in ant workers seems to protect against both high and low temperatures (Heinze et al. 2003; Clémencet et al. 2010). Large body size may also protect queens against desiccation. In harvester ants, larger queens lose water at a significantly lower rate (Wiernasz and Cole 2003). Further, in F. aquilonia, larger queens normally have a better pathogen encapsulation rate than smaller individuals (Sorvari et al. 2008). However, this association was reversed in clear-cuts, suggesting that queens cannot invest concurrently in both large body size and effective immune functions in a resourcepoor environment. Production of good quality queens may be possible in clear-cuts by reducing the number of produced gynes.

F. aquilonia is an obligately polygynous species, i.e., it may have monogynous colonies only on very rare occasions. Queens of F. aquilonia, as well as the queens of the other species in a Formica rufa group, can establish new colonies via temporary parasitism by taking over a nest of Formica (Serviformica) sp. (Gösswald 1989; Buschinger 2009). In temporary parasitism, the parasitic species depends on a host species only during the founding phase of new colonies by young queens (Buschinger 2009). However, this is an extremely rare way to found a colony in F. aquilonia because a mated queen of F. aquilonia almost always returns to her natal or other conspecific nest and joins the existing queen pool of the colony (Rosengren et al. 1993). Therefore, the survival of a colony in different habitats is not so dependent upon the large size of the queen, which is contrary to species that found colonies independently (i.e., by a single queen).

When queens tend to join their natal colonies, and if the size is strongly mediated by heritable factors, the size of nestmate queens should be similar, and the possible variation should exist between colonies from different areas. In accordance, there was significant variation between colonies, i.e., a significant effect of the random variable nest within an area. This again may be a sign of the strong genetic component of queen size in F. aquilonia.

Environmental variation in worker size may not be selected against because it is beneficial for colonies to have workers of different sizes for different tasks (e.g., Billick and Carter 2007; Evison and Ratnieks 2007). By contrast, queens have less diverse tasks, therefore they may have a certain optimal size (or sizes in cases of species with di- or tri-morphic queens), which may, particularly in obligately polygynous species with a single colony founding strategy, be mostly free from environmental variation.

The results of our study did not show effects of forest clear-cutting on body size of queens, but clear-cutting has been shown to decrease production of sexual offspring (Sorvari and Hakkarainen 2005, 2007c) and change the relationship between body size and immunity in queens of F. aquilonia (Sorvari et al. 2008). While the body size is not affected, the number and quality of produced queens seem to be altered.

Acknowledgements

H. Hakkarainen helped in queen collection trips. L. M. Rantala measured the head width of the queens. K. O'Brien gave valuable comments on the manuscript. The study was funded by the Finnish Cultural Foundation and Niemi Foundation (M. K. Haatanen ), and by Emil Aaltonen's foundation (J. Sorvari).

References

1.

AJ Abell , BJ Cole , R Reyes , DC. Wiernasz 1999. Sexual selection on body size and shape in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis Cresson. Evolution 53: 535 –545. Google Scholar

2.

S Aron , L Keller , L. Passera 2001. Role of resource availability on sex, caste and reproductive allocation ratios in the Argentine ant Linepithema humile. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 831 –839. Google Scholar

3.

K Bargum , JJ Boomsma , L. Sundström 2004. A genetic component to size in queens of the ant, Formica truncorum. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57: 9 –16. Google Scholar

4.

M Beekman , P van Stratum , R. Lingeman 1998. Diapause survival and post-diapause performance in bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 89: 207 –214. Google Scholar

5.

I Billick , C. Carter 2007. Testing the importance of the distribution of worker sizes to colony performance in the ant species Formica obscuripes Forel. Insectes Sociaux 54: 113 –117. Google Scholar

6.

A. Buschinger 2009. Social parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 12: 219 –235. Google Scholar

7.

A Buschinger , M. Schreiber 2002. Queen polymorphism and queen-morph related facultative polygyny in the ant, Myrmecina graminicola (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 49: 344 –353. Google Scholar

8.

W Czechowski , A Radchenko , W. Chechowska 2002. The ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Poland. Museum and Institute of Zoology. Google Scholar

9.

J Clémencet , L Cournault , A Odent , C. Doums 2010. Worker thermal tolerance in the thermophilic ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 57: 11 –15. Google Scholar

10.

CA. Collingwood 1979. The Formicidae (Hymenoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 8: 9 –179. Google Scholar

11.

CJ DeHeer , MAD Goodisman , KG. Ross 1999. Queen dispersal strategies in the multiple-queen form of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. American Naturalist 153: 660 –675. Google Scholar

12.

RJ Deslippe , R. Savolainen 1994. Role of food supply in structuring a population of Formica ants. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:756 –764. Google Scholar

13.

RJ Deslippe , R. Savolainen 1995. Sex investment in a social insect: The proximate role of food. Ecology 76: 375 –382. Google Scholar

14.

SEF Evison , FLW. Ratnieks 2007. New role for majors in Atta leafcutter ants. Ecological Entomology 32: 451 –454. Google Scholar

15.

EJ. Fjerdingstad 2005. Control of body size of Lasius niger ant sexuals —worker interests, genes and environment. Molecular Ecology 14: 3123 –3132. Google Scholar

16.

EJ Fjerdingstad , L. Keller 2004. Relationships between phenotype, mating behavior, and fitness of queens in the ant Lasius niger. Evolution 58: 1056 –1063. Google Scholar

17.

D Fournier , G Battaille , I Timmermans , S. Aron 2007. Genetic diversity, worker size polymorphism and division of labour in the polyandrous ant Cataglyphis cursor. Animal Behaviour 75: 151 –158. Google Scholar

18.

VS Fraser , B Kaufmann , BP Oldroyd , RH. Crozier 2000. Genetic influence on caste in the ant Camponotus consobrinus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 47: 188 –194. Google Scholar

19.

K. Gösswald 1989. Die Waldameise. Band 1.AULA-Verlag. Google Scholar

20.

K Hamaguchi , K. Kinomura 1996. Queen-size dimorphism in the facultatively olygynous ant Leptothorax-spinosior (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 27: 241 –251. Google Scholar

21.

J Heinze , S Foitzik , B Fischer , T Wanke , VE. Kipyatkov 2003. The significance of latitudinal variation in body size in a holartic ant, Leptothorax acervorum. Ecography 26: 349 –355. Google Scholar

22.

A Hemmi , V. Jormalainen 2002. Nutrient enhancement increases performance of a marine herbivore via quality of its food alga. Ecology 83: 1052 –1064. Google Scholar

23.

JM. Herbers 1984. Queen-worker conflict and eusocial evolution in a polygynous ant species. Evolution 38: 631 –643. Google Scholar

24.

KJ. Howard 2006. Three queen morphs with alternative nest-founding behaviours in the ant Temnothorax longispinosus. Insectes Sociaux 53: 480 –488. Google Scholar

25.

B Hölldobler , EO. Wilson 1990. The Ants. The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

26.

RJ Keenan , JP. Kimmins 1993. The ecological effects of clear-cutting. Environmental Reviews 1(2): 121 –144. Google Scholar

27.

L Keller , L. Passera 1989. Size and fat content of gynes in relation to the mode of colony founding in ants (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Oecologia 80: 236 –240. Google Scholar

28.

L Keller , KG. Ross 1993. Phenotype plasticity and “cultural transmission” of alternative social organizations in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33: 121 –129. Google Scholar

29.

T Kikuchi , S Higashi , T. Murakami 1999. A morphological comparison of alates between monogynous and polygynous colonies of Myrmica kotokui in northernmost Japan. Insectes Sociaux 46: 250 –255. Google Scholar

30.

JL Kovacs , EA Hoffman , SM Marriner , JA Rekau , MAD. Goodisman 2009. Environmental and genetic influences on queen and worker body size in the social wasp Vespula maculifrons. Insectes Sociaux 57: 53 –65. Google Scholar

31.

C Liautard , WD Brown , KR Helms , L. Keller 2003. Temporal and spatial variations of gyne production in the ant Formica exsecta. Oecologia 136: 558 –564. Google Scholar

32.

JRB Lighton , MC Quinlan , DH. Feener 1994. Is bigger better — water-balance in the polymorphic desert harvester ant Messor pergandei. Physiological Entomology 19: 325 –334. Google Scholar

33.

TA. Linksvayer 2006. Direct, maternal, and sibsocial genetic effects on individual and colony traits in an ant. Evolution 60(12): 2552 –2561 Google Scholar

34.

RC Littell , GA Milliken , WW Stroup ,RD Wolfinger , O. Schabenberger 2006. SAS ® for Mixed Models , 2nd edition. SAS institute Inc. Google Scholar

35.

DA McInnes , WR. Tschinkel 1995. Queen dimorphism and reproductive strategies in the fire ant Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36: 367 –375. Google Scholar

36.

NB Metcalfe , P. Monanghan 2001. Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 254 –260. Google Scholar

37.

J Meunier , M. Chapuisat 2009. The determinants of queen size in a socially polymorphic ant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 1906 –1913. Google Scholar

38.

K Murase , K Kinomura , T. Itioka 2000. Difference in queen size distribution and monogyny/polygyny frequencies between two sibling ant species of Leptothorax (Hymenoptera : Formicidae). Sociobiology 36:53 –62. Google Scholar

39.

P. Pamilo 1982. Genetic population structurein polygynous Formica ants. Heredity 48: 95 –106. Google Scholar

40.

P Punttila , J. Kilpeläinen 2009. Distribution of mound-building ant species (Formica spp., Hymenoptera) in Finland: preliminary results of a national survey. Annales Zoologici Fennici 46: 1 –15. Google Scholar

41.

R Rosengren , K Vepsäläinen , H Wuorenrinne .1979. Distribution, nest densities and ecological significance of wood ants (the Formica rufa group) in Finland. Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique Contre les Animaux et les Plantes Nuisibles, Bulletin Section Regionale Ouest Palearctique II-3:181 –213. Google Scholar

42.

R Rosengren , W Fortelius , K Lindström , A. Luther 1987. Phenology and causation of nest heating and thermoregulation in red wood ants of the Formica rufa group studied in coniferous forest habitats in southern Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 24: 147 –155. Google Scholar

43.

R Rosengren , L Sundström , W Fortelius. 1993. Monogyny and polygyny in Formica ants: the result of alternative dispersal tactics. In: L Keller , Editor. Queen number and sociality in insects. pp. 308 –333. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

44.

H Rosset , M. Chapuisat 2007. Alternative lifehistories in socially polymorphic ant. Evolutionary Ecology 21: 577 –588. Google Scholar

45.

O Rüppell , J Heinze , B. Hölldobler 2001a. Complex determination of queen body size in the queen dimorphic ant Leptothorax rugatulus (Formicidae: Hymenoptera). Heredity 87: 33 –40. Google Scholar

46.

O Rüppell , J Heinze , B. Hölldobler 2001b. Genetic and social structure of the queen size dimorphic ant Leptothorax cf. andrei. Ecological Entomology 26: 76 –82. Google Scholar

47.

O Rüppell , J Heinze , B. Hölldobler 2001c. Alternative reproductive tactics in the queen size dimorphic ant Leptothorax rugatulus (Emery) and population genetic onsequences. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50:189 –197. Google Scholar

48.

T Schwander , H Rosset , M. Chapuisat 2005. Division in labour and worker size polymorphism in ant colonies: the impact of social and genetic factors. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59: 215 –221. Google Scholar

49.

B. Seifert 1991. The phenotypes of the Formica rufa complex in East Germany. Abhandlungen und Berichte Des Naturkundemuseums Görliz 65: 1 –27. Google Scholar

50.

J Sorvari , H. Hakkarainen 2004. Habitatrelated aggressive behaviour between neighbouring colonies of the polydomous wood ant Formica aquilonia. Animal Behaviour 67: 151 –153. Google Scholar

51.

J Sorvari , H. Hakkarainen 2005. Deforestation reduces nest mound size and decreases the production of sexual offspring in the wood ant Formica aquilonia. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42: 259 –267. Google Scholar

52.

J Sorvari , H. Hakkarainen 2007a. Wood ants are wood ants: deforestation causes population declines in the polydomous wood ant Formica aquilonia. Ecological Entomology 32: 707 –711. Google Scholar

53.

J Sorvari , H. Hakkarainen 2007b. Forest clearing and sex ratio in forest-dwelling wood ant Formica aquilonia. Naturwissenschaften 94: 392 –395. Google Scholar

54.

J Sorvari , H. Hakkarainen 2007c. The role of food and colony size in sexual offspring production in a social insect: an experiment. Ecological Entomology 32: 11 –14. Google Scholar

55.

J Sorvari , H. Hakkarainen 2009. Forest clearcutting causes small workers in the polydomous wood ant Formica aquilonia. Annales Zoologici Fennici 46: 431 –438. Google Scholar

56.

J Sorvari , H Hakkarainen , MJ. Rantala 2008. Immune defense of ants is associated with changes in habitat characteristics. Environmental Entomology 37: 51 –56. Google Scholar

57.

J Sorvari , M-K Haatanen , S-R Vesterlund. 2011. Combined effects of overwintering temperature and habitat degradation on the survival of boreal wood ant. Journal of Insect Conservation 15: 727 –731. Google Scholar

58.

L Sundström , P Seppä , P. Pamilo 2005. Genetic population structure and dispersal patterns in Formica ants — a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42: 163 –177. Google Scholar

59.

DC Wiernasz , BJ. Cole 2003. Queen size mediates queen survival and colony fitness in harvester ants. Evolution 57: 2179 –2183. Google Scholar

60.

DC Wiernasz , AK Sater , AJ Abell , BJ. Cole 2001. Male size, sperm transfer, and colony fitness in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Evolution 55:234 –329. Google Scholar

61.

EO. Wilson 1971. The insect societies , 1st edition. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

62.

L Zanette , P Doyle , SM. Trémont 2000. Food shortage in small fragments: evidence from an area sensitive passerine. Ecology 81: 1654 –1666. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Marja-Katariina Haatanen and Jouni Sorvari "Similarity of Body Size in Queens of the Wood ant Formica aquilonia from Optimal and Sub-Optimal Habitats Indicates a Strong Heritable Component," Journal of Insect Science 13(115), 1-11, (1 October 2013). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.013.11501
Received: 16 March 2012; Accepted: 10 October 2012; Published: 1 October 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
forest clear-cutting
habitat quality
phenotype
red wood ants
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top