Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 November 2013 Inhibition of the Responses to Sex Pheromone of the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda
Edi A. Malo, Julio C. Rojas, Rafael Gago, Ángel Guerrero
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Trifluoromethyl ketones reversibly inhibit pheromone-degrading esterases in insect olfactory tissues, affecting pheromone detection and behavior of moth males. In this work, (Z)-9-tetradecenyl trifluoromethyl ketone (Z9-14:TFMK), a closely-related analogue of the pheromone of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), was prepared and tested in electroantennogram and field tests as possible inhibitors of the pheromone action. The electroantennogram parameters, amplitude, and the repolarization time of the antennal responses of S. frugiperda males were affected by Z9-14:TFMK vapors. Exposure of male antennae to a stream of air passing through 100 ìg of the ketone produced a significant reduction of the amplitude and an increase of 2/3 repolarization time signals to the pheromone. The effect was reversible and dose-dependent. In the field, the analogue significantly decreased the number of males caught when mixed with the pheromone in 10:1 ratio. The results suggest that Z9-14:TFMK is a mating disruptant of S. frugiperda and may be a good candidate to consider in future strategies to control this pest.

Introduction

The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a polyphagous species, widely distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas (Andrews 1980), and feeds in more than 60 host plants, although it has a marked preference for gramineous plants (Mitchell 1979). There are two strains of S. frugiperda that occur sympatrically, one feeds predominantly on corn (the corn strain) and the other on rice and various pasture grasses (the rice strain) (Pashley 1996; Prowell et al. 2004).

The S. frugiperda sex pheromone has been studied by a number of authors (Mitchell et al. 1985; Tumlinson et al. 1986; Batista-Pereira et al. 2006; Groot et al. 2008). The sex pheromone composition for the North American population was reported as a mixture of (Z)-9- tetradecen-1-yl acetate (Z9-14:Ac), (Z)-7- dodecen-1-yl acetate (Z7-12:Ac), (Z)-9- dodecen-1-yl acetate (Z9-12:Ac), and (Z)-11- hexadecen-1-yl acetate (Z11-16:Ac) in an 81:0.5:0.5:18 ratio respectively (Tumlinson et al. 1986). The Brazilian population of this species contains an additional component, (E)-7-dodecen-1-yl acetate (E7-12: OAc), that has not been found in the other populations (Batista-Pereira et al. 2006). The pheromone composition also differs in the two host strains. Corn strain females produced significantly more of the second most abundant pheromone compound, (Z)-11-hexadecen-1-yl acetate, and significantly less of most other compounds than rice strain females (Groot et al. 2008).

Pheromone perception in moths and other insects is mediated by olfactory receptor neurons that are localized in long sensilla trichodea of the male antennae (Hansson 1995). After adsorption onto the cuticular surface of the antennae (Kanaujia and Kaissling 1985), pheromone molecules diffuse to the inner cuticular face of the sensory hairs through microscopic pores present in the cuticle of the hair shaft. To diffuse the pheromone into the sensillum lymph, the pheromone is bound to the pheromone-binding protein (Vogt and Riddiford 1981) and transported through the aqueous lymph to the receptor in the dendritic membrane of the olfactory receptor neurons (Vogt and Riddiford 1981; Blomquist and Vogt 2003; Xu et al. 2005). After pheromone stimulation, the sensory neuron returns to its original resting potential by different processes, particularly after the enzymatic degradation of the pheromone (Kaissling 2001). The antennal esterases are key enzymes for the rapid catabolism of pheromone esters (particularly acetates in Lepidoptera), maintaining a low stimulus noise level in sensory hairs (Vogt et al. 1985; Prestwich et al. 1986). The use of inhibitors of these enzymes has been proposed as a potential method for pest control (Prestwich et al. 1986; Renou and Guerrero 2000; Plettner 2002). Trifluoromethyl ketones (TFMKs) are known to inhibit a variety of serine esterases and proteases, particularly the antennal esterases present in male olfactory tissues (Vogt et al. 1985; Duran et al. 1993; Quero et al. 2003). The activity of these compounds arises from the unique features of the fluorine atom, which has a very similar atomic volume as hydrogen and a high electronegativity, which induce fluorinated ketones to form stable hydrates in aqueous solution that are able to produce tetrahedral adducts with the active site of the enzyme (Linderman et al. 1988; Rosell et al. 1996). The development of pheromone antagonists is important for understanding the insect olfactory system and also for practical applications (Plettner and Gries 2010). The aims of this study were: (a) to evaluate the effect of (Z)-1,1,1- trifluorohexadec-11-en-2-one (Z9-14:TFMK), a closely-related analogue of the S. frugiperda pheromone, on electroantennogram (EAG) parameters as amplitude and repolarization time; and (b) to test whether the analogue disrupts the chemical communication system of S. frugiperda.

Materials and Methods

Insects

Larvae of S. frugiperda were collected from maize, Zea mays L. (Poales: Poaceae) at El Manzano colony, municipality of Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico, and brought to the laboratory for rearing on an artificial diet (Rojas et al. 2003). Pupae were sexed, placed in groups of 20–25 in Petri dishes inside glass boxes (30 × 30 × 30 cm), and maintained in a climatic chamber on a 16:8 L:D photoperiod regime at 25 ± 2° C and 60–70% RH until emergence. Adults were collected daily, separated by sex, and fed with 10% sucrose solution until use.

Chemicals

Anhydrous tetrahydrofuran and ether were prepared by distillation from sodium/benzophenone under Ar. Anhydrous pentane was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich ( www.sigmaaldrich.com). Reactions with airor water-sensitive reagents were carried out in dried glassware under Ar. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR), carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR) and fluorine nuclear magnetic resonance (19F NMR) spectra were recorded at 400 or 500, 100, and 376.5 MHz, respectively, as CDCl3 solutions. Electron impact mass spectra were obtained on a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry system using helium as the carrier gas. Z9-14:Ac, Z7-12:Ac, and Z11- 16:Ac were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Z)-9-tetradecenol (Z9-14:OH) was purchased from Bedoukian ( www.bedoukian.com), and their purity, determined with a gas chromatography-flame ionization detector, was > 97%.

(Z)-1-Iodo-9-tetradecene

A mixture of Z9-14:OH (0.50 g, 2.35 mmol), triphenylphosphine (0.74 g, 2.83 mmol), and imidazole (0.19 g, 2.83 mmol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (16 mL) was stirred at 0° C for 20 min. The flask was protected from light, and then iodine (1.00 g, 2.83 mmol) was added in portions. The mixture was stirred at 0° C for 3.5 hr, quenched with a saturated solution of sodium thiosulfate (10 mL), and extracted with hexane (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried, and concentrated to leave a residue, which was purified by flash chromatography over silica gel, eluting with hexane to give the expected iodo-derivative (0.52 g, 69%). IR (film): õ 3004, 2957, 2925, 2853, 1463, 1179, 719 cm-1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.37–5.32 (m, 2H), 3.19 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.03-2.00 (m, 4H), 1.82 (qt, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.40-1.29 (m, 14H), 0.90 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 130.10, 129.93, 33.71, 32.11, 30.65, 29.85, 29.45, 29.32, 28.67, 27.31, 27.07, 22.51, 14.17, 7.50 ppm.

Z9-14:TFMK

A 0.7 M solution of t-BuLi in pentane (2.40 mL, 1.68 mmol) was added to a solution of (Z)-1-iodo-9-tetradecene (0.49 g, 1.51 mmol) in dry pentane/ether (3:2, 16 mL) at -78° C. The mixture was stirred for 5 min at -78° C, then ethyl trifluoroacetate (1.08 mL, 9.09 mmol) was added in one portion and stirred 10 min at -78° C and at room temperature for 10 min more. The mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by flash chromatography over silica gel, eluting with hexane to yield the desired trifluoromethyl ketone (0.25 g, 57%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.38-5.31 (m, 2H), 2.70 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.02-2.01 (m, 4H), 1.67 (qt, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.32-1.29 (m, 14H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 191.82 (q, J = 69.72 Hz, CO), 130.11, 129.90, 115.72 (q, J = 292.34 Hz, CF3), 36.51, 32.10, 29.83, 29.38 (2C), 29.30 (2C), 28.87, 27.29, 27.06, 22.50, 14.15 ppm. 19F NMR (376.5 MHz, CDCl3) δ -79.76 (CF3) ppm. MS (EI) m/z (%): 292 (M+, 29), 110 (30), 97 (67), 96 (53), 95 (54), 84 (47), 83 (80), 82 (71), 81 (71), 70 (78), 69 (91), 68 (64), 67 (72), 57 (59), 56 (78), 55 (100)..

Electroantennography

Antennal responses of S. frugiperda males to the sex pheromone mixture (Z9-14:Ac Z7- 12:Ac, and Z11-16:Ac in an 86:0.3:13.7 ratio, respectively) and to the inhibitor were determined in EAG. Briefly, a live male was inserted and restrained into a universal fit pipette tip (Corning,  www.corning.com). The reference electrode was inserted into the neck of 4-day-old males, and the recording electrode was connected to the tip of the antenna, from which the last subsegments had been previously excised. Both electrodes were filled with saline solution (Malo et al. 2004a). The signals generated by the antenna were passed through a high-impedance amplifier (NL 1200; Syntech,  www.syntech.nl) and displayed on a monitor equipped with signal processing software (NL 1200, version 2.6; Syntech). A stimulus flow controller (CS-05; Syntech) was used to generate stimuli at 1 min intervals. A flow of humidified pure air (0.7 L/min) was continuously passed over the antenna through the main branch of a 10 mm diameter glass tube. Test solutions (1 and 10 ìg/ìL) of pheromone blend and Z9-14:TFMK were prepared in HPLC-grade hexane. For the intrinsic activity of the inhibitor, the antennae were subjected to puffs of air (1 sec, 0.5 L/min) passing through a Pasteur pipette connected to a lateral branch and containing filter paper (0.5 × 3.0 cm, No. 1, Whatman,  www.whatman.com) loaded with 10 µg of the sex pheromone or Z9-14:TFMK. As a control, two puffs of hexane were insufflated at the start and the end of the assay. To each insect antenna, one puff of pheromone and inhibitor was made at 2 min intervals, and a minimum of eight male antennae were considered in each assay. For analysis, control depolarizations were subtracted from the test stimuli values.

For the inhibition test, vapors of Z9-14:TFMK were applied to the antennae by turning on a flux of air (0.1 L/min), which passed through a Pasteur pipette containing filter paper with 1, 10, and 100 µg of the inhibitor. Pheromone stimulations were performed as above. Three EAG responses to the pheromone were measured at 2 min intervals in pure air, and the average value was considered as the response before treatment. Then, the Z9-14:TFMK flux was turned on for 2 min, and a series of three depolarizations to the pheromone was recorded (response during treatment). The airflow containing Z9-14:TFMK was turned off, and after 5 min of antennal recovery, three new stimulations with pheromone were performed (response after treatment). Antennae of 11 males (only one antenna of each male) were used. The EAG recordings were stored on a computer, and their maximum amplitude and repolarization time at 2/3 of the baseline (2/3 RT) were determined, as described in Perez- Luis et al. (2010).

Field tests

The trials were performed in the sorghum field at El Manzano colony. In this area, two crop cycles are grown annually. Sorghum or maize, watered by sprinkler irrigation, are grown from January to May, and soybean is grown during the rainy season, from July to November (Malo et al. 2004b). In the first experiment, the activity of Z9-14:TFMK alone was tested with regard to the pheromone in a fully randomized block design. In each block, four traps per treatment were deployed and four blocks were considered. The numbers of males caught by the four traps within the block were combined on each observation date, and this constituted a replicate. The blocks were arranged in parallel lines about 50 m apart in a sorghum field (45 ha). Traps were placed at a height of 1.5 m above ground and separated by 50 m from one another. Lures consisted of rubber septa containing 100 µg of pheromone (mixture of Z9-14:Ac, Z7-12:Ac, and Z11-16:Ac in an 86: 0.3:13.7 ratio, respectively) (Malo et al. 2001) or 100 µg of Z9-14:TFMK. Scentry Heliothis traps (Ecogen, Inc., Billings, MT) were used for the experiments. The traps were placed on 21 March to 9 April 2010, rotated within blocks, and the lures were renewed every 10 days. Trap captures were recorded every three to four days for a total of six observation dates.

In the second experiment, the attractiveness of 1:0.1, 1:1, and 1:10 mixtures of the pheromone (100 µg) and the TFMK (10, 100, and 1000 µg) were tested in similar septa and traps. Traps were deployed in a fully randomized block design with six replicates for each treatment. The numbers of males caught by the six traps within the block were combined on each observation date, and this constituted a replicate. Trap catches were recorded every three days for a total of eight observation dates. The experiment lasted from 14 February to 9 March 2011. On each observation date, traps were emptied and the number of males caught was recorded. Voucher specimens were brought to the insect collection of El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico).

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the computer package Statistica (StatSoft 2003). When necessary, the results were transformed to √x to meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances. The EAG neat (recordings minus control) mean responses to Z9-14:TFMK in comparison to the pheromone blend were analyzed by the matched-pairs t-test. For the inhibition experiments, the differences in EAG amplitude and 2/3 RT before, during, and after treatment were also analyzed by the matched-pairs ttest. For the field experiments, the data were analyzed as number of moths captured/ trap/night. The results of the Z9- 14:TFMK activity in comparison to the pheromone were analyzed by the matched-pair ttest, whereas data of inhibition of captures were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a posthoc Tukey test for multiple comparisons of the means (p < 0.05). The level of probability considered significant in all analysis was p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Electroantennogram

Male antennae responded positively in EAG tests to puffs of the pheromone blend and the analogue. In average (± SE), the antennal responses to the pheromone (2.51 ± 0.37 mV) were higher than those to the TFMK (1.10 ± 0.24 mV) (t = 4.67; df = 7; p < 0.01) (Figure 3), which in turn were higher than the control (hexane) (data not shown).

Exposure of the antenna to air loaded with Z9- 14:TFMK (100 µg) resulted in a significant reduction of the EAG amplitude and an increase of the 2/3 RT to the pheromone responses, the effect being reversible (Figure 4). Thus, the amplitude before the treatment was 2.96 ± 0.16 mV vs. 2.03 ± 0.12 mV during exposure (t = 4.6; df = 10; p < 0.001) and 2.97 ± 0.19 mV after treatment (Table 1). Similarly, the 2/3 RT of the pheromone response was significantly increased from 704.9 ± 23.5 ms in pure air to 958.4 ± 42.4 ms in the presence of the inhibitor (t = 3.1; df = 10; p < 0.01) and returned to 725.2 ± 24.8 ms after the experiment.

Table 1.

Mean values of the EAG amplitude and 2/3 repolarization time (2/3 RT) of the responses of Spodoptera frugiperda male antennae before, during and after exposure to Z9-14:TFMK loaded air.

t01_01.gif

When the antenna was subjected to Z9- 14:TFMK (10 µg) loaded air, the amplitude to the pheromone response decreased, but the 2/3 RT value was not affected. Thus, whereas the mean amplitude before the treatment was 1.61 ± 0.14 mV, it was 1.06 ± 0.11 mV (t = 4.38; df = 10; p < 0.01) during exposure and 1.74 ± 0.17 mV after the treatment (Table 1). The 2/3 RT of the pheromone response decreased from 841.2 ± 44.6 ms in pure air to 688.8 ± 36.8 ms in the presence of the analogue (t = 3.1; df = 10; p > 0.05) and returned to 822.2 ± 42.3 ms after the treatment. The effects of both parameters were again fully reversible (Table 1).

No significant effect on the pheromone response was apparent when 1 µg of Z9- 14:TFMK was tested. Thus, the mean amplitude was 2.09 ± 0.16 mV before the treatment, 1.88 ± 0.17 mV (t = -1.99; df = 10; p > 0.05) during exposure, and 2.07 ± 0.17 mV after the treatment (Table 1). Similarly, the effect on the 2/3 RT was not significant (655.9 ± 25.02 ms in air vs. 598.9 ± 45.4 ms (t = -1.90; df = 10; p > 0.05) in the presence of the analogue, and 647.3 ± ms after the treatment).

Field Tests

In a previous trial to discover the intrinsic activity of the analogue, traps baited with Z9- 14:TFMK alone caught a significantly lower number of males (0.08 ± 0.1 males/trap/day) than traps baited with the pheromone blend (0.51 ± 0.04 males/trap/day) (t = 4.17; df = 23; p < 0.001) (data not shown).

In the antagonist assay, the number of males caught with mixtures of pheromone and inhibitor in a 1:10 ratio was significantly reduced when compared to that caught by traps baited with pheromone alone (F = 10.91, df = 3, 28; p < 0.001) (Figure 5). When traps were baited with the antagonist in a 1:1 ratio, the number of males captured was also lower than that caught by the pheromone alone, but the difference was not significant (Figure 5). In the same regard, no effect was observed when the pheromone was mixed with the antagonist in 1:0.1 ratio (Figure 5).

Discussion

The enzymatic systems present in male antennae are responsible for degradation of pheromones, thus the inhibition of these enzymes may disrupt the pheromone communication of moths. Previous results agree with this assessment (Bau et al. 1999; Riba et al. 2001, 2005; Solé et al. 2008a), so in this study, (Z)-9-tetradecenyl trifluoromethyl ketone (Z9-14:TFMK), a closely related analogue of the major sex pheromone component of S. frugiperda, was prepared and was tested in EAG and field tests as a possible inhibitor of the pheromone action. The results show that Z9-14:TFMK elicited a modest EAG response (56% relative to the pheromone), which is in line with the electrophysiological activity of other ketones that are structurally analogues of the pheromone of other lepidoptera. Liljefors et al. (1984) reported modest EAG activity of (Z)-10-pentadecen-2-one, the corresponding analogue of the pheromone of the turnip moth, Agrotis segetum. In the same way, (Z)-16- nonadecen-14-yn-2-one, the analogue resulting from the same replacement on the pheromone structure of the processionary moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa, displayed moderate electrophysiological activity (Parrilla and Guerrero 1994). Z11-14:TFMK, structurally similar to the pheromone of the Z strain of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, also showed limited electrophysiological activity in comparison to the pheromone (37.4 ± 10.6%) (Solé et al. 2008a).

In inhibition tests, Z9-14:TFMK evoked a dose-dependent effect on the EAG kinetics of S. frugiperda males. A 100 ìg dose of the chemical resulted in a decrease of the pheromone signal both in amplitude and 2/3RT, but at 10 ìg dose only the amplitude was affected. No effect was observed at the minimum dose of 1 ìg. The dose of the compound, therefore, appears to be critical to affect the EAG pheromone kinetics of S. frugiperda males. The effects were fully reversible, with the initial values of both parameters being completely recovered 5 min after treatment. The kinetics of the EAG signals are affected by several factors, such as temperature (Bestmann and Dippold 1989; Kodadova and Kaissling 1996), stimulus concentration (Alcorta, 1991), and type of compound (Rumbo et al. 1995). The results of our study agree with those of Renou et al. (1997), in which a potent esterase inhibitor, 3-octylthio-1,1,1-trifluoropropan-2- one (commonly known as OTFP), was found to decrease the EAG amplitude and increase the RT of the pheromone of Spodoptera littoralis. This analogue also modified the EAG responses of Mamestra brassicae and Helicoverpa zea to their pheromones (Renou et al. 1997). In addition, TFMKs elicited a significant reduction of the single sensillum responses to the pheromone of S. littoralis (Renou et al. 1997), A. polyphemus (Pophof et al. 2000), and Sesamia nonagrioides (Quero et al. 2004). The results of our study point to a possible esterase inhibition and/or competitive binding to the pheromone receptors. In this context, it was shown that some TFMKs bind a PBP present in the sensory hairs of the processionary moth to facilitate transportation of these analogues through the haemolymph, in competition with pheromone molecules, to inhibit catabolic enzymes (Feixas et al. 1995). Also, in binding experiments on antennal extracts of Mamestra brassicae, Z11-16:TFMK was able to displace the major component of the pheromone (Campanacci et al. 1999). Binding of the TFMKs to the PBPs may impair the pheromone scavenging role of these proteins, thus contributing to the EAG recovery delay.

Different mechanisms of action may explain the effects of TFMKs as inhibitors of the sex pheromone. First, they may act on olfactory receptor neurons tuned to the pheromone components. For instance, Z11-16:TFMK increased the firing activity of the alcohol and aldehyde neurons in S. nonagrioides male sensilla and decreased the responses of the pheromone (acetate) receptor neurons to the pheromone (Quero et al. 2004). Second, TFMKs can also be bound to the PBP in competition with pheromone molecules (Feixas et al. 1995; Pophof et al. 2000). These effects are consistent with the disruption of male upwind flights induced on S. nonagrioides, O. nubilalis, and S. littoralis males when attracted to virgin females or pheromone lures in a wind tunnel (Bau et al. 1999; Riba et al. 2001, 2005; Guerrero et al. 2003).

In the field, Z9-14:TFMK behaved as an effective antagonist of the pheromone action when mixed with the natural attractant in a 10:1 ratio, the effect being dose-dependent. Dissimilar results were obtained in 1:1 and 0.1:1 inhibitor:pheromone mixtures, because whereas the former formulation displayed an antagonist effect, the latter was apparently synergist, but in neither case were the results significant. Overall, these results agree with those previously reported on S. nonagrioides (Riba et al. 2001), O. nubilalis (Riba et al. 2005; Solé et al. 2008a), Cydia pomonella (Giner et al. 2009), and Zeuzera pyrina (Muñoz et al. 2011), emphasizing the potential utilization of these compounds in pest control. Moreover, the low toxicity displayed by TFMKs has been noticed on Swiss mice (Ashour and Hammock 1987; Riba et al. 2001) and in aquatic toxicity studies on algae growth and survival (Rosa et al. 2006). The low toxicity is probably associated to their reversible mechanism of action, in contrast to other chemicals that are much more toxic irreversible inhibitors of carboxylesterases.

In summary, Z9-14:TFMK elicited a significant reduction of the EAG pheromone responses in S. frugiperda, and behaved as a pheromone antagonist in the field. The results suggest that this pheromone analogue may be a good candidate to consider as a mating disruptant in future strategies to control S. frugifrugiperda. In this context, it is worth noting the notable reduction of damage induced by the maize pests S. nonagrioides and O. nubilalis upon treatment of infested fields with Z11- 16:TFMK in large scale experiments (Solé et al. 2008b).

Figure 1.

Structures of (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:OAc), (Z)-7-dodecenyl acetate (Z7-12:OAc), (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11-16:OAc), pheromone components of Spodoptera frugiperda, and (Z)-9-tetradecenyl trifluoromethyl ketone (Z9-14:TFMK), the antagonist considered in this work. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Figure 2.

Synthetic approach of Z9-14:TFMK. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.jpg

Figure 3.

Neat EAG mean responses of a male antenna of Spodoptera frugiperda to puffs of 10 µg of the sex pheromone blend and Z9-14:TFMK. * indicate significant differences at p < 0.01 (matched-pairs t-test). High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.jpg

Figure 4.

EAG traces of a Spodoptera frugiperda male antenna in response to puffs of pheromone (10 µg) before (upper), during (middle), and after (lower) exposure to air loaded with Z9-14:TFMK (100 mg). Vertical scale: bar = 0.2 mV; horizontal scale: bar = 1 s. High quality figures are available online.

f04_01.jpg

Figure 5.

Mean number of Spodoptera frugiperda males caught in traps baited with the sex pheromone alone and mixtures of the pheromone and Z9-14:TFMK in 1:0.1, 1:1 and 1:10 ratio. Bars followed by the same letter are not significantly different (One-way ANOVA followed by posthoc Tukey test for multiple comparisons of means (p < 0.05)). High quality figures are available online.

f05_01.jpg

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the technical assistance of Armando Virgen and Antonio Santiesteban Hernández and the statistical advice of Javier Valle-Mora (ECOSUR). We also thank MICINN for a FPI fellowship to R. Gago, and CONACYT (project 84072) and CICYT (project AGL 2009-13452-C02-01) for financial support.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

2/3 RT,

repolarization time at 2/3 of the baseline;

EAG,

electroantennogram;

NMR,

nuclear magnetic resonance;

TFMK,

Trifluoromethyl ketone;

Z7-12:Ac,

(Z)-7-dodecen-1-yl acetate;

Z9-12:Ac,

(Z)-9-dodecen-1-yl acetate;

Z9-14:Ac,

(Z)-9- tetradecen-1-yl acetate;

Z9-14:TFMK,

(Z)-1,1,1-trifluorohexadec-11-en-2-one;

Z11-16:Ac,

(Z)-11-hexadecen-1-yl acetate

References

1.

E. Alcorta 1991. Characterization of the electroantennogram in Drosophila melanogaster and its use for identifying olfactory capture and transduction mutants. Journal of Neurophysiology 65: 702–714. Google Scholar

2.

KI. Andrews 1980. The wholworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Central America and neighboring areas. Florida Entomologist 63: 456–467. Google Scholar

3.

M-BA Ashour , BD. Hammock 1987. Substituted trifluoroketones as potent selective inhibitors of mammalian carboxylesterases. Biochemical Pharmacology 36: 1869–1879. Google Scholar

4.

LG Batista-Pereira , K Stein , AF De Paula , JA Moreira , I Cruz , M de LC Figueiredo , J Perri Jr , AG. Correa 2006. Isolation, identification, synthesis and field evaluation of the sex pheromone of the Brazilian population of Spodoptera frugiperda. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32: 1085–1099. Google Scholar

5.

J Bau , D Martínez , M Renou , A. Guerrero 1999. Pheromone-triggered orientation flight of male moths can be disrupted by trifluoromethyl ketones. Chemical Senses 24: 473–480. Google Scholar

6.

HJ Bestmann , K. Dippold 1989. Temperature dependence of electrophysiological responses of Lepidoptera antennae. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 44c: 333–344. Google Scholar

7.

G Blomquist , RG. Vogt 2003. Insect pheromone biochemistry and molecular biology, the biosynthesis and detection of pheromone and plant volatiles. Elsevier. Google Scholar

8.

V Campanacci , S Longhi , P Nagnan-Le Meillour , C Cambillau , M. Tegoni 1999. Recombinant pheromone binding protein 1 from Mamestra brassicae (MbraPBP1). Functional and structural characterization. European Journal of Biochemistry 264: 707–716. Google Scholar

9.

I Durán , A Parrilla , J Feixas , A. Guerrero 1993. Inhibition of antennal esterases of the Egyptian armyworm Spodoptera littoralis by trifluoromethyl ketones. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters 3: 2593–2598. Google Scholar

10.

J Feixas , GD Prestwich , A. Guerrero 1995. Ligand specificity of pheromone-binding proteins of the processionary moth. European Journal of Biochemistry 234: 521–526. Google Scholar

11.

M Giner , A Sans , M Riba , D Bosch , R Gago , J Rayo , G Rosell , A. Guerrero 2009. Development and biological activity of a new antagonist of the pheromone of the codling moth Cydia pomonella. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57: 8514–8519. Google Scholar

12.

AT Groot , M Marr , G Schofl , S Lorenz , A Svatos , DG. Heckel 2008. Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in Spodoptera frugiperda. Frontiers in Zoology 5:20. Google Scholar

13.

A Guerrero , MP Bosch , G Rosell , M Riba , A. Sans 2003. New halomethyl ketones and use in traps for the biorational control of insect pests. Spain Pat. 200301667. Google Scholar

14.

BS. Hansson 1995. Olfaction in Lepidoptera. Experientia 51: 1003–1027. Google Scholar

15.

K-E. Kaissling 2001. Olfactory perireceptor and receptor events in moths: A kinetic model. Chemical Senses 26: 125–150. Google Scholar

16.

S Kanaujia , K-E. Kaissling 1985. Interactions of pheromone with moth antennae: Adsorption, desorption and transport. Journal of Insect Physiology 31: 71–81. Google Scholar

17.

B Kodadova , K-E. Kaissling 1996. Effects of temperature on responses of silkmoth olfactory receptor neurons to pheromone can be simulated by modulation of resting cell membrane resistance. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 179: 15–27. Google Scholar

18.

RJ Linderman , J Leazer , RM Roe , K Venkatesh , BS Selinsky , RE. London 1988. 19F NMR spectral evidence that 3-octylthio-1,1,1- trifluoropropan-2-one, as potent inhibitor of insect juvenile hormone esterase, functions as transition state analogue inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 31: 187–194. Google Scholar

19.

T Liljefors , B Thelin , JNC. Van Der Pers 1984. Structure-activity relationships between stimulus molecule and response of a pheromone receptor cell in turnip moth, Agrotis segetum. Modification of the acetate group. Journal of Chemical Ecology 10: 1661–1675. Google Scholar

20.

EA Malo , L Cruz-López , J Valle-Mora , A Virgen , JA Sánchez , JC. Rojas 2001. Evaluation of commercial pheromone lures and traps for monitoring male fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the coastal region of Chiapas, Mexico. Florida Entomologist 84: 659–664. Google Scholar

21.

EA Malo , L Cruz-López , VR Castrejón , JC. Rojas 2004a. Antennal sensilla and electrophysiological response of male and female Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to conspecific sex pheromone and plant odors. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 1273–1284. Google Scholar

22.

EA Malo , F Bahena , MA Miranda , J. Valle-Mora 2004b. Factors affecting the trapping of males of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with pheromones in Mexico. Florida Entomologist 87: 88–293. Google Scholar

23.

ER. Mitchell 1979. Migration by Spodoptera exigua and Spodoptera frugiperda, North America style. In: LR Rabb , GG Kennedy , Editors. Movement of Highly Mobile Insects: Concepts and Methodology Research. pp. 386–393. North Carolina State University. Google Scholar

24.

ER Mitchell , JH Tumlinson , JN. McNeil 1985. Field evaluation of commercial pheromone formulations and traps using a more effective sex pheromone blend for the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 78: 1364–1369. Google Scholar

25.

L Muñoz , MP Bosch , L Batllori , G Rosell , D Bosch , A Guerrero , J. Avilla 2011. Synthesis of allylic trifluoromethyl ketones and activity as inhibitors of the sex pheromone of the leopard moth, Zeuzera pyrina L. (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Pest Management Science 67: 956–964. Google Scholar

26.

A Parrilla , A. Guerrero 1994. Trifluoromethyl ketones as inhibitors of the processionary moth sex pheromone. Chemical Senses 19: 1–10. Google Scholar

27.

DP. Pashley 1996. Host-associated genetic differentiation in fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)- a sibling species complex. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 79: 898–904. Google Scholar

28.

CP Perez-Luis , A Guerrero , EA. Malo 2010. Inhibition of electrophysiological response to the pheromone of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Journal of Pesticide Science 35: 23–26. Google Scholar

29.

E. Plettner 2002. Insect pheromone olfaction: New targets for the design of species selective pest control agents. Current Medicinal Chemistry 9: 1075–1085. Google Scholar

30.

E Plettner , R. Gries 2010. Agonists and antagonists of antennal responses of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) to the pheromone (+)-disparlure and other odorants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58: 3708–3719. Google Scholar

31.

B Pophof , T Gebauer , A. Ziegelberger 2000. Decyl-thio-trifluoropropanone, a competitive inhibitor of moth pheromone receptors. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 186: 315–323. Google Scholar

32.

GD Prestwich , RG Vogt , LM. Riddiford 1986. Binding and hydrolysis of radio labeled pheromone and several analogues by malespecific antennal proteins of the moth Antheraea polyphemus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12: 323–333. Google Scholar

33.

DP Prowell , M McMichael , JF. Silvain 2004. Multilocus genetic analysis of host use, introgression, and speciation in host strains of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 1034–1044. Google Scholar

34.

C Quero , G Rosell , O Jiménez , S Rodriguez , MP Bosch , A. Guerrero 2003. New fluorinated derivatives as esterase inhibitors. Synthesis, hydration and crossed specificity studies. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 11: 1047–1055. Google Scholar

35.

C Quero , J Bau , A Guerrero , M. Renou 2004. Responses of the olfactory receptor neurons of the corn stalk borer Sesamia nonagrioides to components of the pheromone blend and their inhibition by a trifluoromethyl ketone analogue of the main component. Pest Management Science 60: 719–726. Google Scholar

36.

M Renou , P Lucas , EA Malo , C Quero , A. Guerrero 1997. Effects of trifluoromethyl ketones and related compounds on the EAG and behaviour responses to pheromones in male moths. Chemical Senses 22: 407–416. Google Scholar

37.

M Renou , A. Guerrero 2000. Insect parapheromones in olfaction research and semiochemical-based pest control strategies. Annual Review of Entomology 48: 605–630. Google Scholar

38.

M Riba , A Sans , P Bau , G Grolleau , M Renou , A. Guerrero 2001. Pheromone response inhibitors of the corn stalk borer Sesamia nonagrioides. Biological evaluation and toxicology. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 1879–1897. Google Scholar

39.

M Riba , A Sans , J Solé , L Muñoz , MP Bosch , G Rosell , A. Guerrero 2005. Antagonism of pheromone response of Ostrinia nubilalis males and implications on behavior in the laboratory and in the field. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 1158–1165. Google Scholar

40.

JC Rojas , A Virgen , L. Cruz-López 2003. Chemical and tactile cues influencing oviposition of a generalist moth, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 32: 1386–1392. Google Scholar

41.

E Rosa , C Barata , J Damásio , MP Bosch , A. Guerrero 2006. Aquatic ecotoxicity of a pheromonal antagonist in Daphnia magna and Desmodesmus subspicatus. Aquatic Toxicology 79: 296–303. Google Scholar

42.

G Rosell , S Herrero , A. Guerrero 1996. New trifluoromethyl ketones as potent inhibitors of esterases: 19F NMR spectroscopy of transition state analog complexes and structure-activity relationships. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 226: 287–292. Google Scholar

43.

ER Rumbo , DM Suckling , G. Karg 1995. Measurement of airborne pheromone concentrations using electroantennograms: interactions between environmental volatiles and pheromones. Journal of Insect Physiology 41: 465–471. Google Scholar

44.

J Solé , A Sans , M Riba , G Rosell , E Rosa , L Muñoz , MP Bosch , A. Guerrero 2008a. Differential activity of non-fluorinated and fluorinated analogues of the European corn borer pheromone. Chemoecology 18: 99–108. Google Scholar

45.

M Barrot , J Palència , J Castellà , A. Guerrero 2008b. Reduction of damage by the Mediterranean corn borer, Sesamia nonagrioides, and the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, in maize fields by a trifluoromethyl ketone pheromone analog. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 126: 28–39. Google Scholar

46.

Statsoft. 2003. Statistica, version 15.0. Statsoft, Inc. Available online.  http://www.statsoft.com  Google Scholar

47.

JH Tumlinson , ER Mitchell , PEA Teal , RR Heath , LJ. Mengelkoch 1986. Sex pheromone of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), identification of components critical to attraction in the field. Journal of Chemical Ecology 12: 1909–1926. Google Scholar

48.

RG Vogt , LM. Riddiford 1981. Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae. Nature 293: 161–163. Google Scholar

49.

RG Vogt , LM Riddiford , GD. Prestwich 1985. Kinetic properties of a pheromone-degrading enzyme: The sensillar esterase of Antheraea polyphemus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 82: 8827–8831. Google Scholar

50.

P-X Xu , R Atkinson , DNM Jones , DP. Smith 2005. Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pheromone-sensitive neurons. Neuron 45: 193–200. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Edi A. Malo, Julio C. Rojas, Rafael Gago, and Ángel Guerrero "Inhibition of the Responses to Sex Pheromone of the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda," Journal of Insect Science 13(134), 1-14, (1 November 2013). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.013.13401
Received: 28 March 2012; Accepted: 31 December 2012; Published: 1 November 2013
KEYWORDS
antagonism
mating disruptant
pheromone inhibition
trifluoromethyl ketones
Back to Top