Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2013 The Sublethal Effects of the Entomopathic Fungus Leptolegnia chapmanii on Some Biological Parameters of the Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti
S.A. Pelizza, A.C. Scorsetti, M.C. Tranchida
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) is the primary vector of dengue in the Americas. The use of chemical insecticides is recommended during outbreaks of dengue in order to reduce the number of adult mosquitoes; however, because Ae. aegypti is highly synanthropic, the use of insecticides in densely populated areas is a dangerous practice. Leptolegnia chapmanii Seymour (Straminipila: Peronosporomycetes) is an entomopathogenic microorganism that has demonstrated marked pathogenicity toward the larvae of a number of mosquito species, with little or no effect on non-target insects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the sublethal effects of L. chapmanii on fecundity, number of gonotrophic cycles, fertility, and relationship between wing length and fecundity in Ae. aegypti females. Ae. aegypti females that survived infection with L. chapmanii laid fewer eggs, had a smaller number of gonotrophic cycles, had shorter wings, and were less fertile than controls. This is the first study on the sublethal effects experienced by specimens of Ae. aegypti that survived infection with zoospores of L. chapmanii. Although field studies should be carried out, the results obtained in this study are encouraging because the high and rapid larval mortality caused by L. chapmanii coupled with the reduction of reproductive capacity in Ae. aegypti females seem to cause a significant reduction in the number of adults in the mid and long term, thereby reducing the health risks associated with Ae. aegypti.

Introduction

The mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae), widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, is highly adapted to urban environments. It is frequently found inside or near houses and plays an important role in the transmission of arboviruses such as dengue and urban yellow fever (Belinato et al. 2009).

Currently, control of Ae. aegypti is attained mainly with chemical larvicides that target the insect's central nervous system. However, the long history of insecticide use has led to the development of resistant populations all over the world. Because of this resistance, the study of novel tools to control Ae. aegypti and other insects of medical importance is a major area of interest (Zaim and Guillet 2002).

The use of natural enemies to control mosquitoes, based mainly on the use of products based on Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti), has a successful track record (Ochoa et al. 2009). Formulations of Bti are effective against larvae of Ae. aegypti, but its use is limited because of its high cost and low residual power, requiring regular applications of the product with the consequent increase in the cost of control programs.

Several chemical larvicides and mosquito control agents have been shown to manifest delayed effects at sublethal doses in surviving mosquitos (Simsek et al. 2009). In laboratory studies, Adugelo-Silva and Spielman (1984) have shown that inefficient larvicide reduces larval competition among survivors and increases the density and average body size of the resulting adult population. Hare and Nasci (1986) noted delayed mortality in surviving larvae of Ae. aegypti exposed to a median lethal concentration of Bti. Mulla and Singh (1991) examined some biological parameters and morphogenetic aberrations of Culex quinquefasciatus Say larvae, pupae, and adults after treating larvae with sublethal concentrations of Bti.

Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of entomopathogenic fungi to control mosquito vectors (Farenhorst et al. 2008; Mnyone et al. 2009). These fungi do not cause instant mortality, but cause sublethal and later-life lethal effects on different stages of the mosquito life cycle. Due to such properties, fungi can be potentially used as “evolutionproof agents and overcome mosquito resistance, unlike the currently deployed fastacting chemical insecticides (Mnyone et al. 2011).

Leptolegnia chapmanii Seymour (Straminipila: Peronosporomycetes) has demonstrated marked pathogenicity toward the larvae of a number of mosquito species, with little or no effect on non-target insects (López Lastra et al. 2004). It is important to note that until 2005, L. chapmanii was considered an aquatic fungi belonging to Phylum Oomycota.

In the past few years, the strain LPSC 1099ARSEF 5499 of L. chapmanii has shown encouraging results with regard to its pathogenicity on Ae. aegypti. In previous works, we studied biotic and abiotic factors affecting the infection with L. chapmanii (Pelizza et al. 2007a, b), and also deepened the understanding of longevity and infectivity of zoospores (Pelizza et al. 2008), the production of oogonia and oospores at different temperatures (Pelizza et al. 2010), and the combination of L. chapmanii zoospores with other larvicides such as Bti and temephos (Pelizza et al. 2010).

Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the sublethal effects of L. chapmanii on fecundity, the number of gonotrophic cycles, fertility, and the relationship between wing length and fecundity in Ae. aegypti females.

Materials and Methods

Mosquito larvae

The Ae. aegypti larvae used in this study were obtained from colonies maintained following standard mosquito-rearing techniques (Gerbergetal. 1994).

Pathogen culture

The L. chapmanii strain used in this study (LPSC 1099-ARSEF 5499) was obtained from a puddle with infected larvae of Ochlerotatus albifasciatus (Macquart) in the city of Melchor Romero, La Plata, Buenos Aires province, Argentina (López Lastra et al. 1999). The L. chapmanii strain LPSC 1099ARSEF 5499 was maintained on Emerson's YpSS agar medium (yeast extract 4 g, HK2PO4 1 g, MgSO4 0.5 g, starch 15 g, agar 20 g, distilled water 1000 mL) in 60 × 15 mm sterilized Petri dishes. The zoospore inoculum was obtained as previously by Pelizza et al. (2011).

Number of gonotrophic cycles

To study the possible sublethal effects of L. chapmanii on Ae. aegypti females that survived infection with zoospores of L. chapmanii, 200 healthy Ae. aegypti larvae in the third and fourth stages and a dose of 2.2 × 106 zoospores/mL of L. chapmanii were placed in five 1000-mL plastic containers with 800 mL of distilled water, as in a previous experiment by Pelizza et al. (2008). Additionally, 200 healthy larvae of Ae. aegypti in the third and fourth stages were placed in five plastic containers like to those described above and used as controls. Treated and control containers were placed in incubators at 25° C and with a 12:12 L:D photoperiod. At 24 hr, the containers were examined and pupae were placed individually in glass tubes (3.5 cm in diameter × 7.5 cm in height) with a top covered with wire mesh. Then, 4 mL of distilled water was placed in each tube and a raisin was placed on the mesh as a source of carbohydrates for adults. Treated and control pupae were maintained at 27 ± 1° C, 80% relative humidity, and 12:12 L:D. A total of 200 treated insect (100 females and 100 males) and 200 control insect (100 females and 100 males) were placed in different cages covered with a wire net (50 × 50 × 50 cm) for 72 hr, which allowed the male and female mosquitoes to mate. After this time, an immobilized hen was placed in each cage for 1 hr as a source of blood for mosquito females. After 73 hr, fed females were placed individually in glass tubes with wet paper placed in the inner perimeter to allow the females to lay eggs on the moist paper.

Treated and control females were then kept at 27 ± 1° C, 50% relative humidity, and 12:12 L:D. After oviposition, between 72 and 96 hr after ingestion of blood, eggs were counted and treated and control females that survived were returned to their respective cages. This procedure was repeated until all Ae. aegypti females (both treated and controls) died, and these data were used to evaluate the number of gonotrophic cycles, defined as the period between feeding the female, egg laying, and the next feeding. The experiments described above were replicated three times on different dates under similar laboratory conditions.

The numbers of eggs laid by treated and control females in each gonotrophic cycle were compared by one-way ANOVA test (raw data after checking for homogeneity of variances and normality).

Figure 1.

Wing of Aedes aegypti female. (Al) axillary incision; (A) apex; (L) maximum length. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Relationship between fecundity and wing length

Forewings were measured in dead females (treated and control), following the method of Packer and Corbet (1989). Both wings were measured, and the larger measurement was used for the analysis. The maximum length was determined from the axillary incision to the apex of the wing, excluding the marginal fringe (Figure 1). The experiments described above were replicated three times on different dates under similar laboratory conditions.

The wing length of treated and control females were compared by one-way ANOVA test (raw data after checking for homogeneity of variances and normality).

Fertility

To investigate possible sublethal effects on fertility (number of viable eggs), moist papers with eggs laid in each gonotrophic cycle by both treated and control females of Ae. aegypti were immersed in different plastic trays (38 × 28 cm) with 4000 mL of dechlorinated water and finely ground fish as food. Trays containing the eggs laid by treated and control females were maintained at 27 ± 1° C and 12:12 L:D. First-stage larvae were counted counted and removed daily for five days. The experiments described above were replicated three times on different dates under similar laboratory conditions.

The number of viable eggs laid by treated and control females was analyzed by one-way ANOVA test and transformed by log(x+1) function to achieve homogeneity and normality.

Results and Discussion

Significant differences were observed in the fecundity of females of Ae. aegypti exposed to zoospores of L. chapmanii compared to the controls (Table 1). Significant differences were also observed in the number of gonotrophic cycles of females of Ae. aegypti that survived L. chapmanii infection as compared to the controls (six cycles vs. eight cycles; Table 1). Significant differences (ANOVA, F = 110.90, df = 599, p < 0.0001) were also observed in the maximum length of the wing (1.96 mm ± 0.59 in Ae. aegypti females that had been in contact with L. chapmanii zoospores vs. 2.32 ± 0.18 mm in controls).

Significant differences were observed in fertility between females of Ae. aegypti exposed to zoospores of L. chapmanii and the controls (Table 2). The total percentage of viable eggs laid by treated Ae. aegypti females in their six gonotrophic cycles was 41.76 ± 5.95 %, whereas the percentage of viable eggs laid by control females was 70.23 ± 6.79 % in theireight gonotrophic cycles.

Table 1.

Results of the ANOVA and the average number of eggs laid by treated and control Aedes aegypti females for each gonotrophic cycle.

t01_01.gif

Table 2.

Results of the ANOVA and the percentage of hatched eggs laid by treated and control Aedes aegypti females in each gonotrophic cycle.

t02_01.gif

At the time of this study, the known world distribution of L. chapmanii is restricted to three states of the USA (California, Florida, and Ohio) and the city of Melchor Romero, La Plata, Buenos Aires province, Argentina (Mc Innis and Zattau 1982; Seymour 1984; Lord and Fukuda 1988; Fukuda et al. 1997; López Lastra et al. 1999).

This study is the first to examine the sublethal effects of L. chapmanii on females of Ae. aegypti that survived infection with L. chapmanii. Females that survived infection with L. chapmanii zoospores had smaller forewings in length and laid fewer eggs than the controls. The results are coincident with those observed by Packer and Corbet (1989) in Aedespunctor (Kirby) and Blakmore et al. (2000) in Aedes albopictus (Skuse). This study observed the correlation between body size, wing size, and the number of eggs laid, and found that females with smaller wings and smaller body size had lower fertility.

Similar results were observed by Flores et al. (2004), who applied a sublethal concentration of Bti on Ae. aegypti and found a significant reduction in fecundity in females of this mosquito. Also, it has been shown that three pyrethroids (d-phenothrin, d-allethrin, and tetramethrin) reduce the fecundity of Ae. aegypti when applied in sublethal doses (Shaalan et al. 2005). Scholte et al. (2006) observed a fecundity reduction in samples of Anopheles gambiae Giles treated with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae.

It is important to note that we observed reduced survival and therefore a reduced number of gonotrophic cycles in Ae. aegypti females exposed to zoospores of L. chapmanii. Similar results were obtained by Flores et al. (2004), who treated Ae. aegypti with a sublethal dose (CL70) of Bti. Mnyone et al. (2011) observed a significant reduction in survival of An. gambiae treated with the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and M. anisopliae. We observed a significant reduction in fertility (number of viable eggs) of females of Ae. aegypti that survived infection with zoospores of L. chapmanii when compared with control females. Using different sublethal doses of Bti (CL30, CL50, and CL70), Flores et al. (2004) obtained similar results, i.e., a greater reduction in survival, fecundity, and fertility in Ae. aegypti females when increasing the dose of this biocontrol agent. Belinato et al. (2009) evaluated Ae. aegypti larvae with a sublethal dose of triflumuron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor, and observed a reduction in fertility in surviving mosquito females when compared with control females.

This study marks the first time that the effects of L. chapmanii have been determined on Ae. aegypti larvae surviving L. chapmanii zoospore infection. This information is relevant because the decrease in survival of treated females leads to a smaller number of gonotrophic cycles. Reduced fecundity, body size (smaller length of forewings), and fertility (number of viable eggs) were also observed in treated females. Therefore, L. chapmanii not only causes a high and quick mortality in Ae. aegypti larvae, as shown in previous studies (Pelizza et al. 2008), but also reduces the reproductive capacity of larvae that survive the infection.

Although it is important to perform field studies to evaluate L. chapmanii as a control agent more fully, the characteristics of this control agent (high mortality and reduced reproductive capacity) seem to create a significant reduction in the population of Ae. aegypti in the mid and long term, and consequently reduce the health risks caused by Ae. aegypti as a vector of diseases.

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by CICPBA, CONICET, and Universidad National de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.

References

1.

F Adugelo-Silva , A Spielman. 1984. Paradoxical effects of simulated larviciding on production of adult mosquitoes. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 88: 1267–1269. Google Scholar

2.

TA Belinato , AJ Martins , JBP Lima , TN Camara , AA Peixoto , D Valle. 2009. Effect of the chitin synthesis inhibitor triflumuron on the development, viability and reproduction of Aedes aegypti. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 104: 43–47. Google Scholar

3.

MS Blackmore , CC Lord. 2000. The relationship between size and fecundity in Aedes albopictus. Journal of Vector Ecology 25: 212–217. Google Scholar

4.

M Farenhorst , D Farina , EJ Scholte , W Takken , RH Hunt , M Coetzee , BGJ Knols. 2008. African water storage pots for the delivery of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae to the malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anophele s funestus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 78: 910–916. Google Scholar

5.

AE Flores , GP Garcia , MH Badil , LR Tovar , IF Salas. 2004. Effects of sublethal concentrations of vectovac® on biological parameters of Aedes aegypti. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 20: 412–417. Google Scholar

6.

T Fukuda , OR Willis , DR Barnard. 1997. Parasites of the Asian Tiger mosquito and other container-inhabiting mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in northcentral Florida. Journal of Medical Entomology 84: 226–233. Google Scholar

7.

E Gerberg , D Barnard , R Ward. 1994. Manual for mosquito rearing and experimental techniques. American Mosquito Control Association Bulletin 5: 1–98. Google Scholar

8.

SGF Hare , RS Nasci. 1986. Effects of sublethal exposure to Bti on larval development and adult size in Aedes aegypti. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 2: 325–328. Google Scholar

9.

JC Koella , PA Lynch , MB Thomas , AF Read. 2009. Towards evolution-proof malaria control with insecticides. Evolutionary Applications 2: 469–480. Google Scholar

10.

Lastra CC López , MM Steciow , JJ García. 1999. Registro más austral del hongo Leptolegnia chapmanii (Oomycetes: Saprolegniales) como patógeno de larvas de mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae). Revista Iberoamericana de Micología 16:143–145. Google Scholar

11.

Lastra CC López , AC Scorsetti , GA Marti , JJ García. 2004. Host range and specifity of an Argentinean isolate of the aquatic fungus Leptolegnia chapmanii (Oomycetes: Saprolegniales), a pathogen of mosquito larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). Mycopathologia 158:311–315. Google Scholar

12.

JC Lord , T Fukuda. 1988. An ultrastructural study of Culex quinquefasciatus larvae by Leptolegnia chapmanii (Oomycetes: Saprolegniales). Mycopathologia 104: 67–74. Google Scholar

13.

LL Mnyone , MJ Kirby , DW Lwetoijera , MW Mpingwa , BGJ Knols , W Takken , TL Russell. 2009. Infection of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae with two species of entomopathogenic fungi: effects of concentration, co-formulation, exposure time and persistence. Malaria Journal 8: 309. Google Scholar

14.

LL Mnyone , MJ Kirby , MW Mpingwa , DW Lwetoijera , BGJ Knols , W Takken , CJM Koenraadt , TL Russell. 2011. Infection of Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes with entomopathogenic fungi: effect of host age and blood-feeding status. Parasitology Research 108: 317–322. Google Scholar

15.

T Mc Innis , WC Zattau. 1982. Experimental infection of mosquito larvae by a species of the aquatic fungus Leptolegnia. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 39: 98–104. Google Scholar

16.

MS Mulla, N Singh. 1991. Delayed mortality and morphogenetic anomalies induced by the microbial control agent Bacillus thuringiensis ser (H14) in Culex quinquefasciatus. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 7: 420–423. Google Scholar

17.

G Ochoa , J Arrivillaga. 2009. Bacillus thurigiensis: Avances y perspectivas en el control biológico de Aedes aegypti. Boletin de malariologiá y saludambiental 59: 181–191. Google Scholar

18.

MJ Packer , PS Corbet. 1989. Size variation and reproductive success of female Aedes punctor (Diptera: Culicidae). Ecological Entomology 14: 297–309. Google Scholar

19.

SA Pelizza , Lastra CC López , JJ Becnel , V Bisaro , JJ Garcia. 2007a. Biotic and abiotic factors affecting Leptolegnia chapmanii infection in Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 23: 177–181. Google Scholar

20.

SA Pelizza , Lastra CC López , JJ Becnel , V Bisaro , JJ Garcia. 2007b. Effects of temperature, ph and salinity on the infection of Leptolegnia chapmanii Seymour (Peronosporomycetes) in mosquito larvae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 96: 133–137. Google Scholar

21.

SA Pelizza , Lastra CC López , JJ Becnel , RA Humber , JJ García. 2008. Further research on the production, longevity and infectivity of the zoospores of Leptolegnia chapmanii Seymour (Oomycota: Peronosporomycetes). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 98: 314– 319. Google Scholar

22.

SA Pelizza , AC Scorsetti , Lastra CC López , JJ García. 2010. Production of oogonia and oospores of Leptolegnia chapmanii Seymour (Straminipila: Peronosporomycetes) in Aedes aegypti (L.) larvae at different temperatures. Mycopathologia 169: 71–74. Google Scholar

23.

SA Pelizza , AC Scorsetti , V Bisaro , Lastra CC López , JJ García. 2010. Individual and combined effects of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensi, Temephos and Leptolegnia chapmanii on the larval mortality of Aedes aegypti. Biocontrol 55: 647–656. Google Scholar

24.

SA Pelizza , MN Cabello , MC Tranchida , AC Scorsetti , V Bisaro. 2011. Screening for a culture medium yielding optimal colony growth, zoospore yield and infectivity of different isolates of Leptolegnia chapmanii (Straminipila: Peronosporomycetes). Annals of Microbiology 61: 991–997. Google Scholar

25.

EJ Scholte , BG Knols , W Takken. 2006. Infection of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae reduces blood feeding and fecundity. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 91: 43–49. Google Scholar

26.

RL Seymour. 1984. Leptolegnia chapmanii, an Oomycete pathogen of mosquito larvae. Mycologia 76: 113–120. Google Scholar

27.

EAS Shaalan , DV Canyon , MWF Younes , HA Wahab , AH Mansour. 2005. Effects of sublethal concentrations of synthetic insecticides and Callitris glaucophylla extracts on the development of Aedes aegypti. Journal of Vector Ecology 30: 295–298. Google Scholar

28.

FM Simsek , MM Akiner , SS Caglar. 2009. Effects of sublethal concentration of Vectobac 12 AS on some biological parameters of the malaria vector Anopheles superpictus. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8: 1326–1331. Google Scholar

29.

M Zaim , P Guillet. 2002. Alternative insecticides: an urgent need. Trends in Parasitology 18: 161–163. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
S.A. Pelizza, A.C. Scorsetti, and M.C. Tranchida "The Sublethal Effects of the Entomopathic Fungus Leptolegnia chapmanii on Some Biological Parameters of the Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti," Journal of Insect Science 13(22), 1-8, (1 March 2013). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.013.2201
Received: 23 November 2011; Accepted: 1 October 2012; Published: 1 March 2013
KEYWORDS
biocontrol
dengue
fecundity
fertility
gonotrophic cycles
mosquitoes
zoospores
Back to Top